Genetic risk factors for inhibitors to factors VIII and IX

Summary.  The formation of alloantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) is the most severe complication of replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia. In the last decade, genetic factors have been shown to constitute a decisive risk determinant for the development of inhibitors. In severe haemophilia A and B, mutations that result in an absent or truncated FVIII/FIX protein are associated with a 20–80% risk of inhibitor formation. In mild to moderate haemophilia, missense mutations represent the main mutation type, with an inhibitor prevalence of 5%. These patients synthesize some endogenous, although non-functional protein that is sufficient to induce immune tolerance. However, in patients with missense mutations clustered in the A2 and C2 domains (C1/C2 junction), the risk of inhibitor formation is fourfold greater than in patients with mutations outside this region, indicating that inhibitor prevalence in missense mutations is also dependent on localization of the mutation. Recently, a significant association between inhibitor formation and polymorphisms in genes coding for cytokines (IL-10) and other immunoregulatory factors (TNF- α ) has been shown. These genetic factors constitute the individual genetic risk profile of a haemophilic patient. This risk is imprinted and fixed; however, environmental factors such as treatment schedule may increase or decrease the inhibitor risk in an individual patient. Improved understanding of these complex interactions may lead to the development of preventive measures to minimize inhibitor formation.     

Pharmacokinetics of factor VIII and factor IX

Summary.  A survey of principal pharmacokinetic (PK) studies on factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) plasma- and rDNA-derived concentrates, analysed by means of the PKRD program, has been performed. Notwithstanding the accurate definition of the study design, released in 1991 by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SSC-ISTH), a large variability of PK parameters has been pointed out. In the majority of the PK studies, the size of the population is small. In this situation, a careful individualization of haemophilia therapy is strongly recommended. The tailored prediction of loading and maintenance dosages and the need for strict control of trough FVIII/IX levels are mandatory not only to decrease the risk of bleeds but also to spare financial resources. Recently, the old problem of FVIII assay standardization has again become a concern among physicians, especially after the introduction of B-domain deleted rFVIII concentrate. The discrepancies between the widely used one-stage clotting assay and the chromogenic substrate assay seem to be solved by the introduction of a product-specific laboratory standard.     

Role of enhanced half‐life factor VIII and IX in the treatment of haemophilia

Treatment of congenital haemophilia with factor VIII and IX concentrates often requires frequent infusions. This has obvious implications in establishing effective administration strategies and, in turn, adherence. To overcome these issues, three main technologies – polyethylene‐glycol, Fc‐neonatal IgG₁ and albumin fusion products – have emerged into various stages of clinical development. Published data indicates an approximately 1·5‐ and fivefold increase in half‐life of factor VIII and IX, respectively, compared to standard recombinant concentrates. Studies into efficacy and safety are starting to be published. Monitoring and optimal use of these new concentrates remains unknown. Weekly factor IX prophylaxis appears to be a feasible prophylactic regimen in haemophilia B patients. Weekly longer‐acting FVIII is unlikely to provide adequate prophylaxis in most patients with haemophilia A but may reduce the frequency of infusions. Ongoing clinical trials and real life experience will help shape how these products can be used in practice and their cost effectiveness. The drive for convenience however should not overshadow the ultimate goal of prophylaxis, namely, preventing bleeding and arthropathy.     

Combined prednisolone and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for acquired factor VIII inhibitors: a 2-year review

Acquired inhibitors to factor VIII (FVIII) are rare, but life-threatening in up to 22% of cases. The optimal therapy for suppression of these inhibitors remains unclear. Prednisolone is the mainstay of therapy, producing responses in approximately 30% of cases. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has a similar response rate, but a more rapid effect. We report the results of prednisolone 1 mg kg(-1) combined with IVIg 2 g kg(-1) in divided doses as first-line therapy in seven consecutive patients with acquired FVIII inhibitors. All patients were bleeding at the time of diagnosis with prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time. There were four complete responses, one partial response, one nonresponse and one with an inadequate follow-up for assessment of response, giving an overall response rate of 71%. In all complete responders the inhibitor declined rapidly and was undetectable by day 21 from start of treatment. Therapy was well tolerated and responses have been maintained off treatment for 2-8 months. This is a safe, well-tolerated rapidly acting regimen with good response rates.     

Cross-reactivity to porcine factor VIII of factor VIII inhibitors in patients with haemophilia in Australia and New Zealand

Abstract Background: Inhibitory antibodies which neutralise factor VIII develop in 10–20% of individuals with inherited haemophilia A and rarely as autoantibodies in normal individuals to cause acquired haemophilia. The antibodies are directed against human factor VIII but cross-react to varying degrees with porcine factor VIII. Porcine factor VIII can be used for treatment in individuals with low cross-reactivity.
Aims: To determine the cross-reactivity of factor VIII inhibitors between human factor VIII and porcine factor VIII, in a population of patients with inherited and acquired haemophilia A. Also, to determine whether patients with inherited haemophilia and inhibitors have a higher incidence of factor VIII gene inversion in intron 22.
Methods: Samples and data sheets from 43 patients with inherited and ten with acquired haemophilia were submitted from hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Inhibitor levels to human and porcine factor VIII were measured by the Bethesda method in 39 with inherited and nine with acquired haemophilia A.
Results: Of 39 patients with inherited haemophilia A, cross-reactivity was 0% in 17 patients,1–19% in six, 20–39% in 11 and 40–80% in five. In six of nine patients with acquired haemophilia cross-reactivity was 7%. In inherited severe haemophilia A, the frequency of the intron 22 inversion was not greater in 37 study patients than in 28 patients without an inhibitor.
Conclusions: Many patients in Australia and New Zealand with inhibitors to human factor VIII presently show a low or absent level of cross-reactivity to porcine factor VIII. These may respond to treatment with this concentrate at least in the short term. There remains a group of patients with high cross-reactivity who will respond only to recombinant factor Vila or prothrombin complex concentrates.     

Domiciliary desensitization therapy for young boys with haemophilia and factor VIII inhibitors

Summary Immune tolerance was induced in five consecutive young boys with haemophilia and factor VIII inhibitors using frequent conventional doses of human factor VIII.
All therapy was given at home by parents and the four youngest boys had surgically implanted central venous catheters (Port-a-Cath). Two catheters eventually became infected after 2 and 4 years respectively, otherwise the devices were trouble-free and liked by the families concerned.
Regular domiciliary factor VIII therapy in pre-school children is not difficult with an aid to venous access and immune tolerance can be achieved in those developing factor VIII inhibitors.     

Early factor VIII exposure and subsequent inhibitor development in children with severe haemophilia A

Recent reports have suggested that the incidence of inhibitors in haemophilia is the highest in those first exposed to factor VIII under 6 months of age. In this study, we investigated inhibitor development in children first exposed to FVIII as neonates and also examined the effect of other genetic and environmental variables. Three hundred and forty-eight children with severe haemophilia A were investigated. Inhibitors developed in 68 of 348 (20%), with 34 of 348 (10%) high titre inhibitors. The incidence in relation to initial FVIII exposure was: <1 month nine of 35 (26%), 1-6 months 13 of 51 (25%), 6-12 months 27 of 130 (21%), 12-18 months 13 of 66 (20%) and >18 months six of 66 (9%). While we observed a significant difference in inhibitor development and age at first exposure across all age groups (P = 0.018), no significant difference was observed in children treated at different time points during the first year of life (P = 0.44). Similar results were obtained for high titre inhibitors. There was also no difference in the incidence of inhibitors in relation to initial FVIII exposure in a subgroup of 144 children with the intron 22 mutation. Inhibitors developed more frequently in those initially treated with recombinant when compared with plasma-derived FVIII (P = 0.006) and in those with a major molecular defect (P = 0.009). In this study, exposure to FVIII during the neonatal period was not associated with a higher incidence of inhibitors than those treated later during the first year of life. Initial treatment with recombinant FVIII and the presence of a major molecular defect were the most important variables affecting inhibitor development.     

Inversions of the factor VIII gene in Swedish patients with severe haemophilia A

Abstract: The series comprised 49 Swedish patients with severe haemophilia A [belonging to 49 families (21 with known and 28 with sporadic haemophilia)], of whom 12 had developed F. VIII inhibitors. Using Southern blotting, 45% (22/49) were found to have inversions, i.e., intrachromosomal rearrangements of the tip of the X-chromosome. Twenty patients had one or the other of the two variants of inversions recently published, whereas 2 patients manifested novel band patterns. Inversions were found in 50% of the families with sporadic haemophilia, and in 38% of those with known haemophilia. Fourteen families with sporadic haemophilia A had inversions, the proband carrying the de novo mutation in 4 cases and the proband's mother in 10 cases. Six inversions derived from a male and five from a female X-chromosome meiosis, the origin of the remaining three was not established. Genetic counselling of patients with severe haemophilia A and their families will be considerably improved, as inversions occur in half the severe cases and can be detected by a simple Southern blotting procedure.     

Bleeding events in people with congenital haemophilia A without factor VIII inhibitors receiving prophylactic factor VIII treatment: A systematic literature review

Background

Evidence on bleeding rates in people with congenital haemophilia A (PwcHA) without inhibitors on factor VIII (FVIII) replacement products is inconsistent.

Aim

This systematic literature review assessed bleeding outcomes in PwcHA using FVIII-containing products as prophylactic treatment.

Methods

A search was conducted using the bibliographic databases Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on the Ovid platform. The search involved a bibliographic review of clinical trial studies, routine clinical care studies and registries and a search of ClinicalTrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register and conference abstracts.

Results

The search yielded 5548 citations. A total of 58 publications were included for analysis. In 48 interventional studies, the pooled estimated mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR) and proportion of participants with zero bleeding events were 3.4 (3.0–3.7), 2.0 (1.6–2.5), and 38.5% (33.1–43.9), respectively. In 10 observational studies, the pooled estimated mean (95% CI) ABR, AJBR and proportion of participants with zero bleeding events were 4.8 (4.0–5.5), 2.6 (2.1–3.2), and 21.8% (19.9–47.5), respectively. A large variation in mean effect size for ABR, AJBR and zero bleeding event data across cohorts and cohort types was observed. Funnel plots indicated potential reporting bias for publications incorporating ABR and AJBR data across both interventional and observational studies.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis shows that PwcHA without inhibitors still have bleeds despite FVIII prophylaxis. Improved standardization on capturing and reporting bleeding outcomes is needed so that effective comparisons between treatments can be made.     

The prevalence of factor VIII inhibitors and genetic aspects of inhibitor development in Chinese patients with haemophilia A

Summary. The prevalence of inhibitors in Chinese haemophiliacs has not yet been reported. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors among haemophiliacs who are treated only with plasma‐derived FVIII (pdFVIII), cryoprecipitate or fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and tried to explore the relationship between the generation of inhibitors and particular FVIII deficiency genotypes. Clinical information and blood samples of 1435 patients with haemophilia A (HA) were collected by six haemophilia centres in China. The Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay was used to detect inhibitors. Multiplex PCR, long‐range PCR and direct sequencing were performed for genotyping. The overall prevalence of inhibitors in Chinese HA patients was 3.9% and the prevalence of severe haemophiliacs was 4.3%; 18 of the 56 patients with inhibitors had high titres. A total of 38 different mutations were identified in the 55 patients with inhibitors, including 15 intron 22 and 3 intron 1 inversions, seven large deletions, 14 small deletion/insertions, seven nonsense mutations, one splice site mutations and eight missense mutations. Of 38 mutations, 28 were novel. Patients with large deletions and nonsense mutations were prone to have high titre inhibitors, with incidence rates of 57.1% (4/7) and 42.9% (3/7), respectively. In conclusion, the prevalence of inhibitors in Chinese HA patients is much lower than that reported for other ethnic groups and the large deletion and nonsense mutations are high risk factors for high titre inhibitor development.     

Breastfeeding does not influence the development of inhibitors in haemophilia

Our aim was to test the hypothesis that breastfeeding may reduce development of inhibitors in male infants with haemophilia by inducing an oral immune tolerance to factor VIII. To achieve that goal, we performed a structured epidemiological survey comprising all males born with severe haemophilia A (in all 100 patients, 19 with inhibitors) or haemophilia B (in all 16 patients, six with inhibitors) in Sweden in 1980-99. Our results show no protective effect of breastfeeding.     

Mechanisms of action of immune tolerance induction against factor VIII in patients with congenital haemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors

In its most severe form, haemophilia A is a life-threatening haemorrhagic bleeding disorder that is caused by mutations in the factor VIII (FVIII) gene. About 25% of patients who receive replacement therapy with intravenous FVIII products develop neutralising antibodies (FVIII inhibitors) that inhibit the function of substituted FVIII. Long-term application of high or low doses of FVIII has evolved as an effective strategy for eradicating antibodies and inducing long-lasting immune tolerance. Despite clinical experience with the therapy, little is known about the immunological mechanisms that cause the down modulation of FVIII-specific immune responses or the induction of long-lasting immune tolerance against FVIII. This review summarises current knowledge of the immunological mechanisms that might be involved in the induction of immune tolerance against FVIII in patients with haemophilia A who have FVIII inhibitors. In addition to data from patients with haemophilia A, data from patients who have had organ transplants or have immune-related disorders, such as autoimmune diseases, are considered as well as data from animal models.     

Prophylactic dosing of factor VIII and factor IX from a clinical pharmacokinetic perspective

Summary.  The high cost and limited availability of factor concentrates make dosing of factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) a crucial issue in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia. It has often been recommended that this treatment should aim to maintain a minimum plasma level of 1% of normal coagulation factor activity (FVIII:C or FIX:C). The dosage needed is commonly given as 25–40 U kg⁻¹ three times weekly for FVIII or twice weekly for FIX. However, these guidelines are valid only with several qualifications. First, the actual trough levels required may vary considerably between patients. The clinical severity of haemophilia may depend on more factors than the endogenous level of FVIII:C or FIX:C. Secondly, interindividual variations in dose requirements are also due to variance in the pharmacokinetics of the coagulation factors. Pharmacokinetic calculations are useful to design optimal dosing schedules to achieve required trough levels of FVIII:C or FIX:C. Moreover, tailoring of the dosing of FVIII or FIX according to their disposition in the individual patient can markedly improve the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic treatment. However, the usefulness of in vivo recovery as a guide for prophylactic dosing seems questionable. It should be clearly understood that maintaining a certain trough level of FVIII:C or FIX:C is not an end in itself. Clinical outcome, not the achieved trough level, determines whether a dosage is adequate. Chiefly for economic reasons, the minimum effective dosage of coagulation factor should be determined and used in every patient. The dose requirement should also be re-evaluated at appropriate times.     

Persistent factor VIII inhibitors and orthopaedic complications in children with severe haemophilia A

Summary. Persistence of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) may be a risk factor that increases physical disability in haemophilia A (HA) patients. This study aimed to evaluate prevalence of FVIII inhibitors in previously treated children with severe HA and the impact of persistent inhibitors on knee joint status and lumbar bone mineral density (BMD). Fifty children with severe HA, FVIII <1%; aged 5–16 years were enrolled in this study; they received plasma‐derived FVIII on‐demand treatment for 50–250 exposure days (EDs). Inhibitors were checked at basal visit and were followed up for 1 year, using Bethesda assay. Cross‐sectional clinical scoring and radiological evaluation of the knee joint (by Arnold‐Hilgartner staging and Pettersson score), along with lumbar BMD by Dual Energy X‐ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) were performed. Patients with persistent inhibitors for 1 to 5 years, median 2.5 years, were 10 (20%). Six had high titre and none of them had completely normal knees, seven had advanced knee arthropathy and six had low lumbar BMD in comparison to 2 and 8 of the 40 patients without inhibitors respectively (P < 0.05). Persistence of inhibitors for more than 2 years without immuno‐prophylaxis was a risk factor for joint damage. Low lumbar BMD was found in 88.9% of patients with stages four and five knee arthropathy and in 66.7% of patients with positive hepatitis C. Severe HA children in this Egyptian study had a relatively low prevalence of persistent FVIII inhibitors, which, if not treated, may increase the risk of knee arthropathy and lumbar osteopenia.     

In vivo recovery and early half-life of infused factor VIII in haemophilia A

Between 1980 and 1994, 169 in vivo recovery studies were performed in one haemophilia centre on casually-recruited outpatients with severe haemophilia A, and 149 early-phase half-life studies were performed on patients scheduled for elective surgery. Average recoveries improved from 80% to 97% of the expected values over the study period. No relationship of recovery to level of product purification was seen. In the disappearance studies, plasma factor VIII levels fell to half the peak levels by 3.25h after infusion, on average.     

How I manage patients with inherited haemophilia A and B and factor inhibitors

Development of inhibitors to coagulation factor VIII or IX is still the most challenging complication in haemophilia care. ‘Bypassing agents’ may be used to treat a bleed but the eradication of the inhibitor by immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the main objective in the treatment of a patient with haemophilia who has developed neutralizing antibodies. Several options exist for ITI and the patient may be at ‘good’ or ‘bad risk’ for successful outcome with different regimens. This paper offers a review of current regimens to be considered in the treatment of a bleed in a patient with an inhibitor but the main focus is the aspects of different choices in the management of the child or the adult with severe or mild forms of haemophilia A or B, who has developed an inhibitor. There are also some final outlooks on new and emerging treatment possibilities.