Efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® (human‐cl rhFVIII) in patients with severe haemophilia A undergoing surgical procedures

Introduction

Haemophilia A patients are at a high risk of excess bleeding during surgeries. The aim of haemostatic therapy during the perioperative period is to normalize FVIII level perioperatively and postoperatively to maintain normal haemostasis until wound healing is complete.

Aims/Methods

To examine the efficacy of Nuwiq^® (simoctocog alfa, human‐cl rhFVIII), a 4^th generation recombinant FVIII produced in a human cell line, for surgical prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A. This analysis assessed the efficacy of Nuwiq^® during surgical procedures and in the postoperative period in seven clinical studies of previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe haemophilia A.

Results

Thirty‐six patients, aged 3‐55 years, received surgical prophylaxis with Nuwiq^® for 60 surgeries (28 major and 32 minor). Efficacy was evaluated for 52 surgeries (25 major and 27 minor). The success rate of Nuwiq^® treatment was 98.1% (51 of 52 evaluated surgeries); haemostatic efficacy was assessed as “excellent” or “good” in all but one major surgery (assessed as “moderate”). The number of infusions ranged from 1 to 19 for minor surgeries and from 3 to 76 for major surgeries. The median (range) daily doses were 42.0 (28.2‐100.9) IU kg^?1 for minor surgeries and 69.3 (43.3‐135.6) IU kg^?1 for major surgeries. There were no serious treatment‐related adverse events, and none of the patients developed FVIII inhibitors.

Conclusions

The results of this pooled analysis show that Nuwiq^® was efficacious in maintaining haemostasis during and after major and minor surgical procedures in PTPs with severe haemophilia A.     

Real‐world experience with use of Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), PEGylated for prophylaxis in severe haemophilia A

Introduction

Prophylaxis with extended half‐life factor VIII (FVIII) is approved for haemophilia A, but data regarding routine clinical use are limited.

Aim

To assess real‐world experience of ADYNOVATE^® (Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), PEGylated prophylaxis in children and adults with haemophilia A.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted in three US haemophilia treatment centres. Records of all patients who began Adynovate prophylaxis in routine clinical practice were identified. Demographic, clinical and patient‐reported information beginning 6 months before initiation of Adynovate until the record review was analysed.

Results

Fifteen patients (aged 9 months to 28 years), with median 9 months’ use of Adynovate (range 1‐15 months), were identified. All had switched from another prophylactic regimen, 13 (87%) from standard half‐life recombinant FVIII. Nine (60%) patients had ≥1 bleed within 6 months preswitch. The most frequent reason for switching was to reduce infusion frequency (14 patients). After switching, infusion frequency reduced for 13 patients, and overall weekly factor consumption decreased by 19%. Eight (53%) patients had no bleeds postswitch, three (20%) had spontaneous joint bleeds (vs four pre‐switch), and three (20%) had only mild traumatic bleeds. Patient/parental satisfaction with Adynovate was documented as positive in 13 of 15 (87%) cases; 2 patients were not satisfied and discontinued Adynovate. No adverse events were considered related to Adynovate.

Conclusion

In patients who switched from a standard half‐life FVIII to Adynovate prophylaxis in routine clinical practice, bleeding control was generally improved or maintained, with a lower infusion frequency and factor consumption in most patients.     

Pattern of bleeding in a large prospective cohort of haemophilia A patients: A three‐year follow‐up of the AHEAD (Advate in HaEmophilia A outcome Database) study

Introduction

Outcome data on treatment of patients with haemophilia A spanning several years of real‐world evidence collection are currently very limited.

Aim and methods

The global prospective long‐term Advate^® Haemophilia A Outcome Database (AHEAD) cohort study collects real‐world data from patients with severe and moderate haemophilia. We report an interim data read‐out after three years of observation.

Results

A total of 522 patients were enrolled from 21 countries: 334 completed year 1 follow‐up, 238 completed year 2 and 136 completed year 3, with an overall follow‐up of 811 patient‐years. Median annual bleeding rates (ABR) were 1.7 in the prophylaxis group and 8.9 in the on‐demand group at year 1 visit, 1.6 and 13.0, respectively, at year 2 visit and 2.2 and 10.3, respectively, at year 3 visit. Moreover, about 42% of patients on prophylaxis vs 12% of patients on on‐demand had zero annual joint bleeding rates (AJBR). Effectiveness of prophylaxis and on‐demand treatment was deemed excellent/good in the majority of cases. Octocog alfa (Advate^®) was well tolerated. The inhibitors that developed in nine patients all disappeared spontaneously. Three patients had been previously exposed to FVIII for ≤50 exposure days (EDs), 3 for >50 EDs and 3 showed a borderline positive inhibitory activity (≤0.6 BU/mL).

Conclusions

These data confirm that the goal of zero bleeds is achievable, although not yet achieved in all patients. Understanding reasons behind the lower response to standard prophylaxis regimens in some patients and personalizing prophylactic treatment may further improve outcome in patients with haemophilia A.     

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of bleeding outcomes in severe haemophilia A: Comparing valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy,emicizumab prophylaxis,and FVIII replacement prophylaxis

Introduction

Head-to-head evaluation of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, the first gene therapy approved for haemophilia A, with emicizumab is not available. Therefore, phase 3 trial data were indirectly compared.

Aim

To compare bleeding rates in trials evaluating 6 × 10¹³ vg/kg valoctocogene roxaparvovec (GENEr8-1; NCT03370913), 1.5 mg/kg emicizumab dosed every week (HAVEN 3; NCT02847637), and FVIII prophylaxis (270–902) in participants with severe haemophilia A (FVIII ≤1 IU/dL).

Methods

Valoctocogene roxaparvovec versus emicizumab and FVIII prophylaxis as used in 270–902 versus emicizumab cross-trial comparisons were performed using matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). Individual participant data from GENEr8-1 and 270–902 were weighted to equalise aggregate participant baseline characteristics from HAVEN 3. After MAIC weighting, annualised bleeding rates (ABR) and proportions of participants without bleeds were compared for treated bleeds, all bleeds, treated joint bleeds, and treated spontaneous bleeds.

Results

After MAIC weighting, ABR for all bleeds was statistically significantly lower with valoctocogene roxaparvovec than emicizumab (rate ratio [95% CI], .55 [.33–.93]). Additionally, significantly higher proportions of participants had no treated joint bleeds (odds ratio [95% CI], 2.75 [1.20–6.31]) and no treated bleeds (3.25 [1.53–6.90]) with valoctocogene roxaparvovec versus emicizumab. When compared with the mainly standard half-life FVIII prophylaxis regimens in 270–902, mean ABRs (except for all bleeds) were significantly lower, and significantly higher proportions reported 0 bleeds for all outcomes with emicizumab.

Conclusion

Valoctocogene roxaparvovec provided generally lower bleeding rates and higher probability of no bleeds, including treated joint bleeds, than emicizumab. Emicizumab was more effective than FVIII prophylaxis regimens used in 270–902.     

Long-term immunogenicity,efficacy and tolerability of simoctocog alfa in patients with severe haemophilia A who had completed the NuProtect study in previously untreated patients

Background

The NuProtect study reported data on the immunogenicity, efficacy and tolerability of simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq^®) in 108 previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A planned to be treated for ≥100 exposure days or up to 5 years. The NuProtect-Extension study collected long-term prophylaxis data in children with severe haemophilia A.

Methods

Patients who completed the NuProtect study according to the protocol were eligible for the NuProtect-Extension study, a prospective, multinational, non-controlled, Phase 3b study.

Results

Of 48 patients who entered the extension study, 47 (median age 2.8 years) received prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa for a median of 24 months, with 82%–88% on a twice-weekly or less regimen. No patient developed FVIII inhibitors during the extension study. The median (IQR) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) during prophylaxis was 0 (0–0.5) for spontaneous bleeding episodes (BEs) and 1.00 (0–1.95) for all BEs. ABRs estimated using a negative binomial model were .28 (95% CI: .15, .53) for spontaneous and 1.62 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.42) for all BEs. During the median follow-up of 24 months, 34 (72%) patients had zero spontaneous BEs and 46 (98%) had zero spontaneous joint BEs. Efficacy in treating BEs was excellent or good for 78.2% of rated BEs, and efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was excellent for two rated surgeries. No treatment-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

No FVIII inhibitors developed during long-term prophylaxis in the NuProtect-Extension study. Prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa was efficacious and well-tolerated, and is therefore an attractive long-term option for children with severe haemophilia A.     

Recombinant factor IX (BAX326) in previously treated paediatric patients with haemophilia B: a prospective clinical trial

A newly developed recombinant factor IX (BAX326¹) was investigated for prophylactic use in paediatric patients aged <12 years with severe (FIX level <1%) or moderately severe (FIX level 1–2%) haemophilia B. The aim of this prospective clinical trial was to assess the safety, haemostatic efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile of BAX326 in previously treated paediatric patients. BAX326 was administered as prophylaxis twice a week for a period of 6 months, and on demand for treatment of bleeds. Safety was assessed by the occurrence of related AEs, thrombotic events and immunologic assessments. Efficacy was evaluated by annualized bleeding rate (ABR), and by treatment response rating (excellent, good, fair, none). PK was assessed over 72 h. None of the 23 treated paediatric subjects had treatment‐related SAEs or AEs. There were no thrombotic events, inhibitory or specific binding antibodies against FIX, rFurin or CHO protein. Twenty‐six bleeds (19 non‐joint vs. 7 joint bleeds) occurred (mean ABR 2.7 ± 3.14, median 2.0), of which 23 were injury‐related. Twenty subjects (87%) did not experience any bleeds of spontaneous aetiology. Haemostatic efficacy of BAX326 was excellent or good for >96% of bleeds (100% of minor, 88.9% of moderate and 100% of major bleeds); the majority (88.5%) resolved after 1–2 infusions. Longer T_1/2 and lower IR were observed in younger children (<6 years) compared to those aged 6 to 12 years. BAX326 administered as prophylactic treatment as well as for controlling bleeds is efficacious and safe in paediatric patients aged <12 years with haemophilia B.     

Patterns of tertiary prophylaxis in Canadian adults with severe and moderately severe haemophilia B

From a young age patients with severe and moderately severe FIX deficiency (haemophilia B) can experience spontaneous or traumatic bleeding and joint destruction may result. The use of coagulation factor IX concentrate to prevent anticipated bleeding, as primary or secondary prophylaxis, has become a common and recommended practice in children. The current practice of using tertiary prophylaxis, in the presence of established joint arthropathy, in adults with haemophilia B is not well characterized. This observational study was conducted to gain a better understanding of the recent Canadian experience with tertiary prophylaxis in adults with severe and moderately severe haemophilia B. Data were collected from all eligible adult (≥ 18 years of age) males with baseline FIX:C ≤ 2% from seven Canadian Hemophilia Treatment centres over a 2‐year observation period from 2009 to 2011. Thirty‐four per cent of the 67 subjects with moderately severe haemophilia B were exposed to prophylaxis with the majority as continuous prophylaxis (≥45 weeks year^‐1). The severe subgroup (FIX:C < 1%) demonstrated a 52% exposure rate. None had primary prophylaxis exposure in childhood. Eighty‐one per cent used once or twice weekly infusion regimens and reported a median annual bleeding rate of five bleeds per year versus four bleeds per year for those using on‐demand treatment. Annual median factor utilization for all subjects using prophylaxis was 196 283 U year^‐1 compared to 46 361 U year^‐1 for on demand. Approximately 50% of adults with severe haemophilia B are using continuous tertiary prophylaxis in Canada, a practice likely to increase which warrants further study.     

Clinical observation on safety and efficacy of a plasma‐ and albumin‐free recombinant factor VIII for on‐demand treatment of Chinese patients with haemophilia A

Summary. Recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) has become the best choice for treating bleeding of haemophilia A patients. A plasma‐ and albumin‐free recombinant FVIII (rAHF‐PFM, ADVATE^®), as the third generation rFVIII, virtually eliminates the risk of blood‐borne disease transmission by excluding all human blood derived additives throughout cell culture, purification and formulation. In this multicentre prospective clinical study we evaluated the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of ADVATE^® in Chinese patients with haemophilia A. Fifty‐eight patients enrolled and received ADVATE^® treatment. Of the patients enrolled, eight (13.79%) had severe haemophilia, 45 (77.59%) had moderate haemophilia and five (8.62%) had mild haemophilia. Fifty‐four patients completed 6 months of observation. A total of 781 bleeds occurred in these 58 subjects, all evaluable per‐protocol. A total of 984 infusions were administered with a mean of 17.0 ± 11.1 infusions per patient. On average, each patient received a mean of 15030.2 ± 7972.7 IU ADVATE^® (median 13 625 IU, range 9500–19 750 IU) during 6 months. The majority of bleeding episodes (95.9%) were successfully treated with one or two infusions of ADVATE^®. Overall, response to the first ADVATE^® treatment was rated as either ‘excellent’ (82.8%) or ‘improved’ (17.2%) in all subjects. All patients tolerated ADVATE^® infusions well. One patient (1/58, 1.7%) developed an inhibitor of 4 Betheseda units at day 180 visit. The results of this clinical observational study support that ADVATE^® is efficacious, safe and well tolerated in the treatment of Chinese patients with haemophilia A.     

Real‐world comparative analysis of bleeding complications and health‐related quality of life in patients with haemophilia A and haemophilia B

Introduction

Clinical severity and impact of haemophilia on quality of life have been generally considered to be lower for haemophilia B (HB) compared with haemophilia A (HA) patients.

Aims

To compare annual bleeding rate (ABR), target joint development and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) between adult (≥18 years) severe HA and HB patients using recent data from the Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey (CHESS) study.

Methods

Multivariate generalized linear models (GLM) were constructed to assess the relationship between haemophilia type, ABR, HRQoL (derived from EQ‐5D index scores) and the presence of target joints while controlling for covariates.

Results

Of the 1225 patients included, 77% (n = 949) had HA and 23% (n = 278) had HB. Of the 514 patients who completed the EQ‐5D, 78% (n = 405) had HA, and 22% (n = 110) had HB. Unadjusted mean ABR was 3.79 in HA and 4.60 in HB. The presence of ≥1 target joint was reported in 59% and 54% of patients with HA and HB, respectively. Unadjusted mean EQ‐5D index score was 0.78 in HA and 0.76 in HB. Haemophilia type was not a significant predictor of ABR, target joints or HRQoL when adjusted for confounding factors such as BMI, age and replacement therapy regimen.

Conclusion

Data suggest comparable ABR, incidence of target joints and HRQoL between patients with HB and HA indicating comparable clinical severity and disease impact on patient quality of life.     

Low incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A treated with octanate®: Final report from a prospective study

Introduction

Octanate^® is a human, plasma‐derived, von Willebrand factor‐stabilized coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate with demonstrated haemostatic efficacy in previously treated patients with haemophilia A.

Aim

This prospective, open‐label study aimed to assess the immunogenicity of octanate^® in previously untreated patients (PUPs).

Methods

The study monitored development of FVIII inhibitors in 51 PUPs. Tolerability, viral safety, FVIII recovery and efficacy of octanate^® for the prevention and treatment of bleeds and in surgical procedures were also assessed.

Results

Five (9.8%) of the 51 patients developed inhibitors during the study, 4 of which (7.8%) were high titre. Three inhibitor cases (5.9%) were considered clinically relevant; 2 were transient inhibitors that disappeared during regular octanate^® treatment without a change in dose or treatment frequency. Amongst 45 patients with FVIII:C <1% at baseline and who received ≥20 exposure days (EDs) or had <20 EDs but developed an inhibitor, inhibitor incidence was 11.1% (6.7% clinically relevant). All clinically relevant inhibitors developed within 20 EDs of on‐demand treatment. No inhibitors developed in PUPs receiving prophylaxis. All patients who developed inhibitors had either intron 22 inversions or large deletions. Irrespective of the reason for administration, haemostatic efficacy was rated as “excellent” in 99.6% of all infusions (4700 of 4717 infusions), and no complications were reported in 23 surgical procedures. Mean incremental in vivo recovery was 2.0%/IU/kg (±0.7) and 1.9%/IU/kg (±0.5) for the first and second assessments, respectively. Tolerability was rated “very good” in 99.9% of infusions.

Conclusion

In PUPs with severe haemophilia A, octanate^® demonstrated haemostatic efficacy with a low rate of inhibitor development.     

An open clinical study assessing the efficacy and safety of Factor IX Grifols®, a high‐purity Factor IX concentrate,in patients with severe haemophilia B

Summary. Factor IX Grifols^® is a new high‐purity plasma‐derived FIX concentrate with two specific pathogen elimination steps. Until this study was performed, there were no detailed reports with an adequate number of patients on the clinical evaluation of this product. To determine the efficacy and safety of Factor IX Grifols^® for replacement therapy in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia B, this open, multicentre and non‐randomized study included 25 male subjects over the age of 12 with severe haemophilia B. Patients underwent prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes with Factor IX Grifols^® for 1 year. The clinical efficacy and safety of this product were assessed. Forty percent of the patients were children and adolescents (12–17 years old). During the 12 months follow‐up, 1 446 000 IU of Factor IX Grifols^® were administered in 961 infusions (range 12–83 infusions per patient): 31% for prophylaxis and 69% for bleeding episodes. Only five major bleeding events were reported in two patients. These haemorrhages were successfully treated with a mean of 2900 IU per bleed (range 1500–4000 IU), and 1–3 infusions per bleed. The average time elapsed from the first infusion to resolution of bleeding was 43 h (median). Overall, haemostasis was rated as excellent or good by the investigator in 96% of the infusions. No product‐related adverse events were reported. Factor IX Grifols^® is an effective and safe Factor IX concentrate and can be considered as a first line option for replacement therapy in haemophilia B patients.     

Clinical experience with moroctocog alfa (AF‐CC) in younger paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A: Two open‐label studies

Introduction

The pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of moroctocog alfa (AF‐CC) have been demonstrated in haemophilia A patients aged ≥6 years.

Aim

These studies aimed to further describe moroctocog alfa (AF‐CC) experience in paediatric patients (<12 years) with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C < 1%).

Methods

Two prospective, open‐label studies enrolled patients aged <12 years: one study with 37 previously treated patients (PTPs) and another with 23 previously untreated patients (PUPs). All patients initially received 50 IU/kg of moroctocog alfa (AF‐CC) to evaluate either recovery alone, or with other PK parameters (6 to <12 years) before continuing treatment for 100 exposure days (EDs) or 24 months.

Results

At baseline, mean (±SD) recovery ranged between 1.32 ± 0.65 (PUPs aged <2 years) and 2.13 ± 0.82 (PTPs aged 6 to <12 years). The mean (±SD) half‐life was 9.12 ± 1.94 hours in PTPs aged 6 to <12 years. No new safety signals were detected in either study, 2 transient lower titre inhibitors occurred in PTPs while 8 inhibitors (3 low and 5 high titre) were detected in PUPs. Most bleeding episodes resolved with one infusion (94% [893/954]). The annualised bleeding rate (ABR) in the PTP study was 27.5 and 4.2 for patients reporting an on‐demand and routine prophylaxis regimen at baseline, respectively. In the PUP study, the overall ABR was 5.9.

Conclusion

Moroctocog alfa (AF‐CC) had expected PK findings (lower recovery in young children compared with older children) along with being safe and efficacious in a population of young severe haemophilia A patients.     

Clinical experience with Optivate®, high‐purity factor VIII (FVIII) product with von Willebrand factor (VWF) in young children with haemophilia A

Summary. Optivate^® is a high‐purity FVIII/VWF product. Its safety, tolerability and efficacy in subjects ≥12 years have been demonstrated. This study was undertaken to assess Optivate^® in children with haemophilia A. Twenty‐five children, including one PUP (previously untreated patient), aged 1–6 years (mean 4.67 years) were treated with Optivate^® for 26 weeks. Inhibitors were assessed every 3 months and viral status at the study start and end. Prophylaxis was used by five boys and on demand by twenty. The mean number of bleeds in the study was lower compared to the same period pre‐study (12.0/child vs. 16.2/child), with fewer bleeds (P < 0.05) in the prophylactic subgroup (8.0/child) compared with the on‐demand sub‐group (13.4/child). Fourteen major bleeds were reported, all by the on‐demand sub‐group. Children on prophylaxis were administered a mean of 59.4 infusions; on‐demand group 35.1 infusions. A total of 998 infusions were used with a mean dose of 29.1 IU kg^?1, and a mean of 38.6 exposure days (ED). Children <4 years used higher doses, and reported fewer bleeds than older children. Children’s Parents/Guardians rated Optivate^® as helpful or very helpful in controlling 97.5% of bleeds by the prophylactic group, and in 98.5% of the bleeds in the on‐demand group. Only 5 of 101 ADRs were treatment‐related events (5%), all were mild and non‐serious. There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs, viral transmissions or inhibitors. In young children Optivate^® was well tolerated, safe and efficacious.     

Clinical assessment of Optivate®, a high‐purity concentrate of factor VIII with von Willebrand factor,in the management of patients with haemophilia A

Summary. Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates have revolutionized the treatment of patients with haemophilia A. Concerns over the transmission of viral infections through these products have been addressed through stringent, donor‐screening procedures and robust antiviral manufacturing steps. Bio Products Laboratory has developed a high‐purity FVIII product with von Willebrand factor, Optivate^®. Its safety, tolerability and efficacy as prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds have been established in long‐term studies. Seventy previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A, with ≥20 exposure days, were recruited into two long‐term, multicentre, open‐label studies. The protocols were virtually identical. Patients received Optivate^® either prophylactically or on‐demand. A mean of 159.0 EDs were experienced over 11 320 infusions. Under both conditions, Optivate^® was well tolerated. Only 10% of patients experienced a treatment‐related adverse event; the most commonly reported were headache (4% of patients) and dizziness (3% of patients). The mean number of bleeds/patient over the 2 year treatment period was 23.5 during prophylactic use and 70.4 during on‐demand use. In patients treated prophylactically, clinical responses to breakthrough bleeds were rated by physicians as excellent or good and as very helpful or helpful by patients in 95% of bleeds. Clinical responses for on‐demand patients were rated as excellent or good by physicians and helpful or very helpful by the patients for 91% of bleeds. There were no viral transmissions or inhibitors. The studies confirm the clinical efficacy and safety of Optivate^® in both prophylactic and on‐demand management of patients with haemophilia A.     

Safe switching from a pdFIX (Immunine®) to a rFIX (Bax326)

The ability to switch between coagulation factors safely is of common interest to haemophilia patients and treating physicians. This is the first formal prospective comparative evaluation of safety, efficacy and incremental recovery of a plasma‐derived FIX (pdFIX) and a recombinant FIX (rFIX) in the same haemophilia B patients following a switch from pdFIX Immunine^® to a recently developed rFIX Bax326 product. Patients (aged <65 years) who completed a pretreatment study which prospectively documented the exposure to Immunine^® and monitored FIX inhibitors while receiving prophylactic treatment were transitioned into pivotal (patients aged 12–65 years) and paediatric (patients aged <12 years) clinical studies investigating prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes with Bax326. None of the 44 patients developed inhibitory or specific binding anti‐FIX antibodies during the course of the studies. A total of 38 unrelated adverse events (AEs) were occurred in 20/44 (45.5%) subjects during the Immunine^® study. Following a switch to Bax326, 51 AEs were reported in 25/44 (56.8%) subjects. The incidence of AEs related to Bax326 treatment (two episodes of dysgeusia in one patient) was low (2.3%); there were no serious adverse reactions. The comparison between Immunine^® and Bax326 demonstrated analogous haemostatic characteristics and annualized bleeding rates. Overall, there is direct evidence indicating a safe and clinically effective transition from a pdFIX (Immunine^®) to a newly developed rFIX (Bax326¹) for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in previously treated patients of all age cohorts with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B.     

The clinical efficacy and safety of the FVIII/VWF concentrate,BIOSTATE®, in children with von Willebrand disorder: a multi‐centre retrospective review

Summary. Factor replacement with BIOSTATE^®, a factor VIII (FVIII)/von Willebrand factor concentrate, forms the mainstay of treatment for children with von Willebrand disorder (VWD) in Australia and New Zealand. However, published data on the clinical efficacy and safety of BIOSTATE in the VWD paediatric population are limited. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of BIOSTATE in 43 children with VWD who received treatment for surgery, non‐surgical bleeds or continuous prophylaxis at eight paediatric haemophilia centres in Australia and New Zealand. Data were collected on patient demographics, disease history, treatment history, dosage, administration, adverse reactions, concomitant medications and excessive bleeding events. BIOSTATE provided excellent/good haemostatic efficacy in 90% of surgical procedures (n = 42) with a mean daily FVIII dose of 47 IU FVIII:C kg^?1 and a median treatment duration of 3 days. Excellent/good haemostatic efficacy was achieved in 94% of non‐surgical bleeding events (n = 72) with a mean FVIII dose of 45 IU FVIII:C kg^?1 day^?1 and a median treatment duration of 1 day. There were no bleeding events attributable to lack of efficacy. One case of nausea, possibly related to BIOSTATE administration, was reported. These results suggest that BIOSTATE is safe and effective for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding in children with VWD.     

Multicentre,randomized, open‐label study of on‐demand treatment with two prophylaxis regimens of recombinant coagulation factor IX in haemophilia B subjects

Few randomized studies have reported on the use of factor IX (FIX) for secondary prophylaxis in haemophilia B patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two secondary prophylaxis regimens of recombinant coagulation FIX, nonacog alfa, compared with on‐demand therapy. Male subjects aged 6–65 years with severe or moderately severe haemophilia B (FIX:C ≤ 2, n = 50) and ≥12 bleeding episodes (including ≥6 haemarthroses episodes) within 12 months of study participation were enrolled in this multicentre, randomized, open‐label, four‐period crossover trial. The primary measure was the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of two prophylactic regimens vs. on‐demand therapy. In the intent‐to‐treat group, mean ABR values were 35.1, 2.6 and 4.6 for the first on‐demand period, the 50 IU kg^?1 twice‐weekly period, and the 100 IU kg^?1 once‐weekly period respectively. Differences in ABR between the first on‐demand period and both prophylaxis regimens were significant (P < 0.0001); no significant differences were observed between prophylaxis regimens (P = 0.22). Seven serious adverse events occurred in five subjects, none related to study drug. Results demonstrated that secondary prophylaxis therapy with nonacog alfa 50 IU kg^?1 twice weekly or 100 IU kg^?1 once weekly reduced ABR by 89.4% relative to on‐demand treatment. Both prophylaxis regimens demonstrated favourable safety profiles in subjects with haemophilia B.     

Clotting factor activity levels and bleeding risk in people with haemophilia playing sports

Background

Improved treatment options for people with haemophilia (PWH) have increased the possibilities for sports participation, but the risk of sports-induced bleeding (SIB) is still considered considerable by many.

Aim

To assess sports associated injury- and bleeding risk in PWH and to assess clotting levels associated with safe sports participation.

Methods

Sports injuries and SIBs were prospectively collected for 12 months in PWH aged 6–49 without inhibitors playing sports at least once weekly. Injuries were compared according to factor levels, severity, joint health, sports risk category and sports intensity. Factor activity at the time of injury was estimated using a pharmacokinetic model.

Results

125 participants aged 6–49 (41 children, 90% haemophilia A; 48% severe, 95% severe on prophylaxis) were included. Sports injuries were reported by 51 participants (41%). Most participants (62%) reported no bleeds at all and only 16% reported SIBs. SIBs were associated with factor levels at time of injury (OR: 0.93/%factor level (CI 0.88–0.99); p = .02), but not with haemophilia severity (OR: 0.62 (CI 0.20–1.89); p = .40), joint health, sports risk category or sports intensity. PWH with factor levels <10% during sports injury had a bleeding risk of 41% versus 20% in those with higher (>10%) factor levels.

Conclusion

The results of this study emphasize the importance of clotting factor levels in prevention of bleeds. This information is vital for patient counselling and tailoring prophylactic treatment with clotting factors and non-replacement therapy.     

Patient characteristics that influence efficacy of prophylaxis with rFVIII‐FS three times per week: a subgroup analysis of the LIPLONG study

Prospective data on the efficacy of secondary prophylaxis in adults with haemophilia A are limited. To analyse bleeding outcomes in the sucrose‐formulated recombinant factor VIII [rFVIII‐FS (control)] arm of the LIPLONG study, a randomized, double‐blind, 52‐week trial was conducted in patients with severe haemophilia A receiving prophylaxis with the investigational product BAY 79‐4980 or rFVIII‐FS. The per‐protocol population of previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A without a history of inhibitors (n = 68 males; mean age, 34.4 years) received 25 IU kg^?1 rFVIII‐FS three times per week for a median of 50.7 weeks. Annualized bleeding rates were assessed and analysed according to predefined target joint status at study start, prestudy treatment type (prophylaxis vs. on demand), age (<30 or ≥30 years), geographical region, bleeding frequency during the previous 6 months and physical activity status during the study using the Student t‐test. The annualized median (range) number of bleeds was 2.2 (0.0–23) bleeds per year. The median (range) number of bleeds per year was significantly lower in patient subgroups without vs. with target joints [0.5 (0.0–17.1) vs. 4.2 (0.0–22.8); P = 0.02] and in those with ≤9 vs. >9 bleeds during the previous 6 months [1.1 (0.0–19.2) vs. 5.3 (0.0–22.8); P = 0.01]. Following randomization to prophylaxis with rFVIII‐FS, bleeding frequency was effectively reduced. Absence of target joints and prestudy bleeding frequency were predictors of a low bleeding frequency during prophylaxis treatment.     

Safety and efficacy of investigator‐prescribed BeneFIX® prophylaxis in children less than 6 years of age with severe haemophilia B

Summary. Prophylaxis is increasingly prescribed in treatment of haemophilia and its benefit is believed to be most significant for the youngest patients as haemophilic arthropathy may be prevented if prophylaxis is initiated prior to recurrent haemarthroses. While clinical prophylaxis data are readily available for haemophilia A, analogous data for haemophilia B are relatively limited. A prospective clinical study of recombinant factor IX (BeneFIX^®; rFIX), designed to allow investigator prescribed prophylaxis according to customary practices, was conducted in children <6 years old with severe haemophilia B. Nearly all children were prescribed prophylaxis (22/25; 88%) for all or part of their study participation. Favourable efficacy and safety profiles were reported. Routine prophylaxis with 1 or 2 rFIX infusions per week over an average of greater than 6 months of therapy resulted in near complete prevention of spontaneous breakthrough haemorrhages (<1 per year), with most children (77%) having none, including seven patients (32%) who had no bleeding episodes at all. Haemorrhages in joints were less common than those outside joints (27% vs. 73% of haemorrhages). In a patient population that included children with multiple prior haemarthroses, 68% of children had no joint bleeding. Breakthrough haemorrhages resolved with 1 or 2 infusions in 89% of episodes. The absence of changes in prophylaxis infusion schedules suggests that 1 or 2 rFIX infusion(s) per week were well‐tolerated by these young patients, including those with (41%) and without (59%) central venous access devices. Safety was established by the low incidence of treatment‐related adverse events.