Intracranial haemorrhage in children and adolescents with severe haemophilia A or B – the impact of prophylactic treatment

The discussion of prophylactic therapy in haemophilia is largely focused on joint outcomes. The impact of prophylactic therapy on intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) is less known. This study aimed to analyse ICH in children with haemophilia, with a focus on different prophylaxis regimens and sequelae of ICH. We conducted a multicentre retrospective and prospective study that included 33 haemophilia centres from 20 countries. Inclusion criteria were children and adolescents born between 1993 and 2014, with severe haemophilia A or B without inhibitors. Participants were categorized by prophylaxis regimen: full, partial or none, based on dose and dose frequency of regular infusions. The cohort study included 1515 children: 29 cases of ICH over 8038 patient years were reported. The incidence of ICH in the prophylaxis group, 0·00033 cases of ICH/patient year, was significantly lower compared to the no prophylaxis group, 0·017 cases of ICH/patient year (RR 50·06; P < 0·001) and the partial prophylaxis group, 0·0050 cases of ICH/patient year (RR 14·92; P = 0·007). In the on‐demand‐group, 8% (2/24) children with ICH died and 33% had long‐term sequelae, including intellectual and behavioural problems, paresis and epilepsy. Children on regular, frequent prophylaxis have a low risk of ICH compared to those using non‐frequent or no prophylaxis.     

Long‐term tolerability,immunogenicity and efficacy of Nuwiq® (human‐cl rhFVIII) in children with severe haemophilia A

Introduction

Nuwiq^® (human‐cl rhFVIII, simoctocog alfa) is a 4th generation recombinant human FVIII, without chemical modification or fusion with any other protein, produced in a human cell line.

Aim/Methods

This study (GENA‐13) was an extension of the GENA‐03 study in which previously treated children aged 2‐12 years with severe haemophilia A received Nuwiq^® prophylaxis for ≥6 months. GENA‐13 examined long‐term tolerability, immunogenicity and efficacy of Nuwiq^® prophylaxis in children.

Results

Of 59 patients enrolled in GENA‐03, 49 continued Nuwiq^® prophylaxis in GENA‐13 for a median (range) of 30.0 (9.5‐52.0) months. No patient withdrew due to drug‐related adverse events or developed inhibitors. Only 2 of 20 518 infusions were associated with possibly related adverse events (dyspnoea, fever). The estimated annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.44, 1.02) for spontaneous and 2.88 (95% CI: 1.86, 4.46) for all bleeds. Younger children (2‐5 years) had lower ABRs than children aged 6‐12 years. Annualized bleeding rates were reduced in GENA‐13 vs GENA‐03, especially for spontaneous bleeds in younger children (71% reduction; ABR ratio 0.29 [95% CI: 0.11, 0.74]). Nuwiq^® efficacy was rated as excellent/good in the treatment of 83.0% of 305 evaluated breakthrough bleeds. Surgical prophylaxis with Nuwiq^® was rated as excellent for all 17 assessed procedures.

Conclusion

Long‐term treatment with Nuwiq^® for the prevention of bleeds in children with severe haemophilia A was well tolerated, effective and reduced spontaneous bleeding by up to 70% compared with GENA‐03.     

Burden of illness and costs among paediatric haemophilia patients with and without central venous access devices treated in US hospitals

Introduction

Central venous access devices (CVADs) facilitate repeated or urgent treatments for paediatric haemophilia patients, but are associated with complications. This study examined the burden of illness, healthcare utilization and costs for CVADs in a real‐world hospital setting.

Materials and Methods

This study included haemophilia patients ages ≤18 years with discharges during 2006‐2014 in the US Premier Healthcare Database. Haemophilia was identified using ICD‐9 diagnosis codes and CVAD exposure using billing information. After matching haemophilia patients with and without CVADs on demographic and clinical characteristics, we compared infection, thrombosis, length of stay (LOS), inflation‐adjusted hospital cost (2014 $USD) and readmission outcomes using generalized estimating equation models adjusted for hospital teaching status.

Results

Among 4793 paediatric haemophilia patients treated at one of 548 hospitals, a total of 197 patients were identified with CVAD exposure. The matched sample included 310 haemophilia patients (155 CVAD and 155 non‐CVAD). CVAD cases had greater frequencies of all‐cause infections (29% vs 17%, P = .01) and thrombosis (6% vs 1%, P = .06), longer adjusted mean LOS (9.5 vs 4.7 days, P = .002), higher adjusted mean inpatient total hospitalization costs ($47200 vs $25389, P = .02) as well as more inpatient and outpatient visits at 30‐, 60‐ and 90‐days (P < .05 for all differences) compared with non‐CVAD patients.

Conclusion

Paediatric haemophilia patients with CVADs experienced greater infection rates, healthcare utilization and higher hospitalization costs compared with non‐CVAD patients. The results of this study may inform further research efforts to understand the costs and benefits of novel treatment alternatives for young haemophilia patients requiring CVADs.     

Real‐world experience with use of Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), PEGylated for prophylaxis in severe haemophilia A

Introduction

Prophylaxis with extended half‐life factor VIII (FVIII) is approved for haemophilia A, but data regarding routine clinical use are limited.

Aim

To assess real‐world experience of ADYNOVATE^® (Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant), PEGylated prophylaxis in children and adults with haemophilia A.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted in three US haemophilia treatment centres. Records of all patients who began Adynovate prophylaxis in routine clinical practice were identified. Demographic, clinical and patient‐reported information beginning 6 months before initiation of Adynovate until the record review was analysed.

Results

Fifteen patients (aged 9 months to 28 years), with median 9 months’ use of Adynovate (range 1‐15 months), were identified. All had switched from another prophylactic regimen, 13 (87%) from standard half‐life recombinant FVIII. Nine (60%) patients had ≥1 bleed within 6 months preswitch. The most frequent reason for switching was to reduce infusion frequency (14 patients). After switching, infusion frequency reduced for 13 patients, and overall weekly factor consumption decreased by 19%. Eight (53%) patients had no bleeds postswitch, three (20%) had spontaneous joint bleeds (vs four pre‐switch), and three (20%) had only mild traumatic bleeds. Patient/parental satisfaction with Adynovate was documented as positive in 13 of 15 (87%) cases; 2 patients were not satisfied and discontinued Adynovate. No adverse events were considered related to Adynovate.

Conclusion

In patients who switched from a standard half‐life FVIII to Adynovate prophylaxis in routine clinical practice, bleeding control was generally improved or maintained, with a lower infusion frequency and factor consumption in most patients.     

Improved joint health in subjects with severe haemophilia A treated prophylactically with recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein

Introduction

Joint arthropathy is the long‐term consequence of joint bleeding in people with severe haemophilia.

Aim

This study assessed change in joint health over time in subjects receiving recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) prophylaxis.

Methods

ALONG is the phase 3 pivotal study in which the benefit of rFVIIIFc as a prophylactic treatment for bleeding control was shown in previously treated severe haemophilia patients ≥12 years of age (arm 1: 25‐65 IU/kg every 3‐5 days, arm 2: 65 IU/kg weekly and arm 3: episodic). After completing ALONG, subjects had the option to enrol into the extension study (ASPIRE). This interim, post hoc analysis assessed changes in joint health over ~2.8 years in these patients.

Results

Forty‐seven subjects had modified Haemophilia Joint Health Score (mHJHS) data at A‐LONG baseline, ASPIRE baseline and ASPIRE Year 1 and Year 2. Compared with A‐LONG baseline (23.4), mean improvement at ASPIRE Year 2 was ?4.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], ?6.5, ?1.8; P = .001). Regardless of prestudy treatment regimen, subjects showed continuous improvement in mHJHS from A‐LONG baseline through ASPIRE Year 2 (prestudy prophylaxis: ?2.4, P = .09; prestudy episodic treatment: ?7.2, P = .003). Benefits were seen in subjects with target joints (?5.6, P = .005) as well as those with severe arthropathy (?8.8, P = .02). The mHJHS components with the greatest improvement at ASPIRE Year 2 were swelling (?1.4, P = .008), range of motion (?1.1, P = .03) and strength (?0.8, P = .04).

Conclusions

Prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc may improve joint health over time regardless of prestudy prophylaxis or episodic treatment regimens.     

Adherence to prophylaxis is associated with better outcomes in moderate and severe haemophilia: results of a patient survey

Severe haemophilia is associated with bleeding into joints and development of arthropathy. Prophylactic treatment with infusion of replacement clotting factor is known to prevent bleeding, preserve joint functioning and result in higher health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) than episodic treatment; however, adhering to standard prophylaxis schedules can be difficult, and little is known about the relationship between adherence to prophylactic treatment and outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between self‐reported adherence to prophylaxis and health outcomes, including HRQoL and bleeding episodes. Adults with haemophilia (n = 55) and caregivers of children with haemophilia (n = 55) in Australia, Canada, and the United States completed an online questionnaire which included measures of HRQoL (SF‐12v2 for adults and SF‐10 for caregivers of children), self‐reported bleeding episodes, and the VERITAS‐Pro measure of adherence to prophylaxis in haemophilia. Regression analysis was used to test the association between VERITAS‐Pro total score and outcomes. Poorer adherence (higher VERITAS‐Pro scores) was associated with a greater number of self‐reported bleeding episodes in the past year among adults (p < 0.01), more days of work/school missed among paediatric patients (p < 0.01), and lower physical health status scores among paediatric patients (p < 0.05). This study highlights the benefits of adherence to prophylaxis among those with severe haemophilia and provides evidence for the utility of the VERITAS‐Pro by demonstrating a relationship between adherence and outcomes.     

Impact of timing of prophylaxis commencement,F8 genotype and age on factor consumption and health-related quality of life in patients with severe haemophilia A

Introduction

The timing of prophylaxis and F8 genotype can impact treatment outcomes in adults with severe haemophilia A (HA).

Aim

To investigate how F8 genotype, timing, and type of prophylaxis influence arthropathy, bleeding rates, factor consumption and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods

Thirty-eight patients with severe HA were enrolled. Bleeding events were recorded retrospectively during median 12.5 months. F8 gene variants were classified as null or non-null. Joint health and HRQoL were assessed with HJHS and EQ-5D-5L, respectively.

Results

The median age at prophylaxis start was 1.25 years in the primary prophylaxis group (N = 15, median age 26 years) and 31.5 years in the secondary group (N = 22, 45 years), respectively. There were significant differences in the medians of HJHS (4 vs. 20, p < .001), EQ-5D-5L index (0.9647 vs. 0.904, p = .022), EQ VAS (87 vs. 75, p = .01) and FVIII consumption (3883 vs. 2737 IU/kg/year, p = .02), between the primary and secondary groups, respectively. Median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 0 for both groups. Twenty-five null and thirteen non-null F8 gene variants were identified. In the secondary prophylaxis group, lower median FVIII consumption (1926 vs. 3370 IU/kg/year) was shown for non-null compared to null variants, respectively, with similar ABR and HJHS.

Conclusion

Delayed prophylaxis start with intermediate dose intensity prevents bleeds but at a cost of more arthropathy and reduced HRQoL, compared to higher intensity primary prophylaxis. Non-null F8 genotype may allow lower factor consumption with similar HJHS and bleeding rates, compared to null genotype.     

Identifying biomechanical gait parameters in adolescent boys with haemophilia using principal component analysis

Introduction

Improvements in the medical management for those with haemophilia have resulted in improved clinical outcomes. However, current treatment regimens do not alleviate all joint haemarthroses with the potential for long‐term joint deterioration remaining. The evaluation of functional activities such as gait, using standardized tools to monitor children with haemophilia is emerging.

Aim

This study explored differences in sagittal plane biomechanics of walking in adolescent boys aged 11‐18 years with haemophilia and an age‐matched group of typically developing boys.

Methods

A motion capture system and 2 force platforms were used to collect sagittal plane kinematic, kinetic and temporal spatial data during level walking. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to kinematic and kinetic waveform variables. Group differences in temporal spatial and principal component scores for each kinematic and kinetic variable were evaluated using independent t tests.

Results

Significant alterations (P < .05) in temporal spatial and kinetic parameters were found in adolescent boys with haemophilia. Compared with typically developing adolescent boys, boys with haemophilia walked with reduced stance phase duration and altered pattern of external ankle joint moments during push off and the beginning of swing.

Conclusion

The use of PCA rather than predetermined discriminatory variables provided additional insight into biomechanical alterations in adolescent boys with haemophilia, with adaptations occurring during terminal double support and early swing, affecting the ankle joint. This finding might be a key biomechanical marker that could be used to evaluate the joint function and the progression of early haemophilic arthropathy.     

Clinical experience with moroctocog alfa (AF‐CC) in younger paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A: Two open‐label studies

Introduction

The pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy and safety of moroctocog alfa (AF‐CC) have been demonstrated in haemophilia A patients aged ≥6 years.

Aim

These studies aimed to further describe moroctocog alfa (AF‐CC) experience in paediatric patients (<12 years) with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C < 1%).

Methods

Two prospective, open‐label studies enrolled patients aged <12 years: one study with 37 previously treated patients (PTPs) and another with 23 previously untreated patients (PUPs). All patients initially received 50 IU/kg of moroctocog alfa (AF‐CC) to evaluate either recovery alone, or with other PK parameters (6 to <12 years) before continuing treatment for 100 exposure days (EDs) or 24 months.

Results

At baseline, mean (±SD) recovery ranged between 1.32 ± 0.65 (PUPs aged <2 years) and 2.13 ± 0.82 (PTPs aged 6 to <12 years). The mean (±SD) half‐life was 9.12 ± 1.94 hours in PTPs aged 6 to <12 years. No new safety signals were detected in either study, 2 transient lower titre inhibitors occurred in PTPs while 8 inhibitors (3 low and 5 high titre) were detected in PUPs. Most bleeding episodes resolved with one infusion (94% [893/954]). The annualised bleeding rate (ABR) in the PTP study was 27.5 and 4.2 for patients reporting an on‐demand and routine prophylaxis regimen at baseline, respectively. In the PUP study, the overall ABR was 5.9.

Conclusion

Moroctocog alfa (AF‐CC) had expected PK findings (lower recovery in young children compared with older children) along with being safe and efficacious in a population of young severe haemophilia A patients.     

Long-term immunogenicity,efficacy and tolerability of simoctocog alfa in patients with severe haemophilia A who had completed the NuProtect study in previously untreated patients

Background

The NuProtect study reported data on the immunogenicity, efficacy and tolerability of simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq^®) in 108 previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A planned to be treated for ≥100 exposure days or up to 5 years. The NuProtect-Extension study collected long-term prophylaxis data in children with severe haemophilia A.

Methods

Patients who completed the NuProtect study according to the protocol were eligible for the NuProtect-Extension study, a prospective, multinational, non-controlled, Phase 3b study.

Results

Of 48 patients who entered the extension study, 47 (median age 2.8 years) received prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa for a median of 24 months, with 82%–88% on a twice-weekly or less regimen. No patient developed FVIII inhibitors during the extension study. The median (IQR) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) during prophylaxis was 0 (0–0.5) for spontaneous bleeding episodes (BEs) and 1.00 (0–1.95) for all BEs. ABRs estimated using a negative binomial model were .28 (95% CI: .15, .53) for spontaneous and 1.62 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.42) for all BEs. During the median follow-up of 24 months, 34 (72%) patients had zero spontaneous BEs and 46 (98%) had zero spontaneous joint BEs. Efficacy in treating BEs was excellent or good for 78.2% of rated BEs, and efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was excellent for two rated surgeries. No treatment-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

No FVIII inhibitors developed during long-term prophylaxis in the NuProtect-Extension study. Prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa was efficacious and well-tolerated, and is therefore an attractive long-term option for children with severe haemophilia A.     

Break‐through bleeding in relation to pharmacokinetics of Factor VIII in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A

Introduction

As the pharmacokinetics (PK) of factor VIII (FVIII) is individualized in children with haemophilia A (HA), PK parameters may be indicators of patients' bleeding phenotype and instruction for their personalized replacement program.

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible relationship between PK/FVIII level and bleeding frequency in Chinese paediatric patients with severe (HA).

Methods

A total of 24 patients were enrolled in Beijing Children's Hospital from February to October 2015, all of whom were given 50 IU/kg of FVIII concentrates after a 72‐hours washout period. Samples' activities (FVIII:C) were tested at 5 time points, using WinNonlin software for PK testing, and then the individual half‐life(t_1/2) and the time (h) of FVIII concentrations <1 IU/dL within a week during prophylaxis were calculated. Baseline and the annual bleeding rate (ABR), annual joint bleeding rate (AJBR) were recorded and analyzed.

Results

The mean t_1/2 of FVIII was 10.20 ± 2.72 hours and the mean time of FVIII <1 IU/dL in 1 week was 44.7 hours (?38.56 to 102.33 hours). A significant relationship between t_1/2 of FVIII and ABR₀/AJBR₀ (baseline bleeding) was found (R² = 0.75 and 0.62, P < .001). Besides, baseline and the annual bleeding rate during prophylactic treatment of haemophilia had a positive correlation with the time (hours) of FVIII <1 IU/dL in 1 week (R² = 0.67 and 0.52, P < .001).

Conclusion

t_1/2 was an important indicator to prevent bleeding in severe HA; the frequency of bleeding will be reduced with the increased of t_1/2 of FVIII. The data also demonstrates that increasing the time with a FVIII<1 IU/dL is associated with an increased rate of bleeding during prophylaxis.     

Dilemmas on emicizumab in children with haemophilia A: A survey of strategies from PedNet centres

Introduction

Haemophilia A care has changed with the introduction of emicizumab. Experience on the youngest children is still scarce and clinical practice varies between haemophilia treatment centres.

Aim

We aimed to assess the current clinical practice on emicizumab prophylaxis within PedNet, a collaborative research platform for paediatricians treating children with haemophilia.

Methods

An electronic survey was sent to all PedNet members (n = 32) between October 2022 and February 2023. The survey included questions on the availability of emicizumab, on the practice of initiating prophylaxis in previously untreated or minimally treated patients (PUPs or MTPs) and emicizumab use in patients with or without inhibitors.

Results

All but four centres (28/32; 88%) responded. Emicizumab was available in clinical practice in 25/28 centres (89%), and in 3/28 for selected patients only (e.g. with inhibitors). Emicizumab was the preferred choice for prophylaxis in PUPs or MTPs in 20/25 centres; most (85%) started emicizumab prophylaxis before 1 year of age (30% before 6 months of age) and without concomitant FVIII (16/20; 80%). After the loading dose, 13/28 centres administered the recommended dosing, while the others adjusted the interval of injections to give whole vials. In inhibitor patients, the use of emicizumab during ITI was common, with low-dose ITI being the preferred protoco l .

Conclusion

Most centres choose to initiate prophylaxis with emicizumab before 12 months of age and without concomitant FVIII. In inhibitor patients, ITI is mostly given in addition to emicizumab, but there was no common practice on how to proceed after successful ITI.     

Pattern of bleeding in a large prospective cohort of haemophilia A patients: A three‐year follow‐up of the AHEAD (Advate in HaEmophilia A outcome Database) study

Introduction

Outcome data on treatment of patients with haemophilia A spanning several years of real‐world evidence collection are currently very limited.

Aim and methods

The global prospective long‐term Advate^® Haemophilia A Outcome Database (AHEAD) cohort study collects real‐world data from patients with severe and moderate haemophilia. We report an interim data read‐out after three years of observation.

Results

A total of 522 patients were enrolled from 21 countries: 334 completed year 1 follow‐up, 238 completed year 2 and 136 completed year 3, with an overall follow‐up of 811 patient‐years. Median annual bleeding rates (ABR) were 1.7 in the prophylaxis group and 8.9 in the on‐demand group at year 1 visit, 1.6 and 13.0, respectively, at year 2 visit and 2.2 and 10.3, respectively, at year 3 visit. Moreover, about 42% of patients on prophylaxis vs 12% of patients on on‐demand had zero annual joint bleeding rates (AJBR). Effectiveness of prophylaxis and on‐demand treatment was deemed excellent/good in the majority of cases. Octocog alfa (Advate^®) was well tolerated. The inhibitors that developed in nine patients all disappeared spontaneously. Three patients had been previously exposed to FVIII for ≤50 exposure days (EDs), 3 for >50 EDs and 3 showed a borderline positive inhibitory activity (≤0.6 BU/mL).

Conclusions

These data confirm that the goal of zero bleeds is achievable, although not yet achieved in all patients. Understanding reasons behind the lower response to standard prophylaxis regimens in some patients and personalizing prophylactic treatment may further improve outcome in patients with haemophilia A.     

Physical and mental quality of life in adult patients with haemophilia in Belgium: the impact of financial issues

In Belgium, where haemophilia affects approximately 1:7000 people (2011), data on patients' quality of life (QoL) is scarce. This project aims to assess physical and mental QoL (P‐QoL and M‐QoL) simultaneously, and to analyse the influence of different variables on these two aspects of QoL. After Ethics Committee approval, we contacted 84 adult haemophilia A (HA) and haemophilia B (HB) patients, without current inhibitors, on replacement therapy (on‐demand or secondary prophylaxis), regularly followed up at our comprehensive treatment centre. Seventy‐one (n = 59 HA, n = 12 HB) replied to our questionnaire, which included the SF36v2 QoL assessment forms. We analysed two groups of variables: one including variables previously associated with decreased QoL, and another including variables with unclear impact on QoL (e.g. patients' understanding of haemophilia‐related issues, economical concerns). In our population (mean ± SD age: 45.2 ± 14.7 years old), P‐QoL appeared more reduced than M‐QoL. P‐QoL was strongly influenced by the number of arthropathies while M‐QoL was primarily affected by patients' concern of personal costs due to haemophilia. Among this latter group, having knowledge of insurance coverage had a positive impact on M‐QoL. Scores did not depend on haemophilia type. QoL was impaired in our haemophilia patients. A simultaneous assessment of P‐QoL and M‐QoL confirmed the benefit of primary prophylaxis in P‐QoL, while originally pointing out the major burden of patients' concerns and poor understanding of haemophilia‐related economical issues on their M‐QoL. This might become a particularly challenging issue in times of financial crisis.     

Adherence to prophylaxis and bleeding outcome in haemophilia: a multicentre study

Prevention of bleeding and joint damage in severe haemophilia is dependent on adherence to prophylactic replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to prophylaxis, including associations with age, bleeding and clotting factor consumption (CFC). In three Dutch haemophilia centres, semi‐structured interviews about adherence to prophylaxis in the previous 2 weeks were conducted with patients or parents of a child with haemophilia. Patients were classified, according to pre‐specified definitions, as adherent, sub‐optimally adherent or non‐adherent based on missing, timing, and dose of infusions. Association of annual bleeding rates, mean CFC, person performing the infusion (parents verus patients) with adherence categories were analysed. Overall, 241 patients with haemophilia using prophylaxis were studied. Parents were more adherent (66%; n = 48/73) than patients (43%; n = 72/168). Sub‐optimal adherence occurred in 29% of parents and 37% of patients and was characterized by changes in timing of infusion (mostly from morning to evening), while missing <6% of infusions. Non‐adherence occurred less often: in 5% of parents and 20% of patients. Reduced adherence was associated with lower CFC, but not with joint bleeding. In conclusion, non‐adherence in haemophilia was relatively rare, yet 1/3 of patients struggled to administer prophylaxis at the appropriate time of day.     

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) reveals alterations in the three‐dimensional bone structure in children with haemophilia

Children with haemophilia are at risk of suboptimal bone mass accrual and low bone mineral density (BMD). We recently demonstrated that although BMD in Finnish children with haemophilia was within the normal range, their whole body BMD was significantly lower and hypercalciuria more prevalent than in controls. This study sought to determine the bone structure and strength in physically active children with haemophilia. To investigate the underlying mechanisms in this group, we conducted a case–control study to assess bone structure and strength by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) at the radius. The study group comprised 29 patients (mean age 12.2 years) and 46 age‐matched controls. Children with haemophilia had decreased total BMD Z‐score at the distal radius (P ≤ 0.001), but increased cortical bone density at the proximal radius (P ≤ 0.001). Total bone area at the proximal radius was significantly lower in children with haemophilia (P = 0.002), whereas there were no differences in cortical bone area or in polar Strength‐Strain Index, a parameter of bone strength, between the patients and controls. Patients with mild to moderate haemophilia and on‐demand treatment had inferior bone strength compared to those with moderate to severe haemophilia and prophylaxis. Our findings suggest altered skeletal development in patients with haemophilia in the radius, resulting in smaller bone size and higher cortical bone density. Importantly, bone strength at the radius appears equal to healthy children. Prophylactic treatment seems to have a beneficial effect on bone health.     

Clotting factor activity levels and bleeding risk in people with haemophilia playing sports

Background

Improved treatment options for people with haemophilia (PWH) have increased the possibilities for sports participation, but the risk of sports-induced bleeding (SIB) is still considered considerable by many.

Aim

To assess sports associated injury- and bleeding risk in PWH and to assess clotting levels associated with safe sports participation.

Methods

Sports injuries and SIBs were prospectively collected for 12 months in PWH aged 6–49 without inhibitors playing sports at least once weekly. Injuries were compared according to factor levels, severity, joint health, sports risk category and sports intensity. Factor activity at the time of injury was estimated using a pharmacokinetic model.

Results

125 participants aged 6–49 (41 children, 90% haemophilia A; 48% severe, 95% severe on prophylaxis) were included. Sports injuries were reported by 51 participants (41%). Most participants (62%) reported no bleeds at all and only 16% reported SIBs. SIBs were associated with factor levels at time of injury (OR: 0.93/%factor level (CI 0.88–0.99); p = .02), but not with haemophilia severity (OR: 0.62 (CI 0.20–1.89); p = .40), joint health, sports risk category or sports intensity. PWH with factor levels <10% during sports injury had a bleeding risk of 41% versus 20% in those with higher (>10%) factor levels.

Conclusion

The results of this study emphasize the importance of clotting factor levels in prevention of bleeds. This information is vital for patient counselling and tailoring prophylactic treatment with clotting factors and non-replacement therapy.     

Compliance with biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: Do patient out‐of‐pocket payments matter?

Objective

To assess the impact of patient out‐of‐pocket (OOP) expenditures on adherence and persistence with biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

An inception cohort of RA patients with pharmacy claims for etanercept or adalimumab during 2002–2004 was selected from an insurance claims database of self‐insured employer health plans (n = 2,285) in the US. Adherence was defined as medication possession ratio (MPR): the proportion of the 365 followup days covered by days supply. Persistence was determined using a survival analysis of therapy discontinuation during followup. Patient OOP cost was measured as the patient's coinsurance and copayments per week of therapy, and as the proportion of the total medication charges paid by the patient. Multivariate linear regression models of MPR and proportional hazards models of persistence were used to estimate the impact of cost, adjusting for insurance type and demographic and clinical variables.

Results

Mean ± SD OOP expenditures averaged $7.84 ± $14.15 per week. Most patients (92%) paid less than $20 OOP for therapy/week. The mean ± SD MPR was 0.52 ± 0.31. Adherence significantly decreased with increased weekly OOP (coeff = ?0.0035, P < 0.0001) and with a higher proportion of therapy costs paid by patients (coeff = ?0.8794, P < 0.0001), translating into ～1 week of therapy lost per $5.50 increase in weekly OOP. Patients whose weekly cost exceeded $50 were more likely to discontinue than patients with lower costs (hazard ratio 1.58, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Most patients pay less than $20/week for biologics, but a small number have high OOP expenses, associated with lower medication compliance. The adverse impact of high OOP costs on adherence, persistence, and outcomes must be considered when making decisions about increasing copayments.     

Development of a haemophilia A gene therapy shared decision-making tool for clinicians

Introduction

As gene therapies are incorporated into clinical practice, shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended for implementation.

Aim

To inform development of a clinician SDM tool for haemophilia A gene therapy.

Methods

Clinicians at US Hemophilia Treatment Centers completed semi-structured interviews about their experience with SDM and provided feedback on a clinician SDM tool prototype. Interviews were transcribed verbatim for coding and thematic content analysis.

Results

Ten participants enrolled, eight physicians and two haemophilia nurses. All participants care for adults with haemophilia (1-27 years of experience) and 7 have gene therapy trials open at their institution. Confidence in having a clinical discussion about gene therapy included none (N = 1), slight (N = 3), moderate (N = 5) and high (N = 1). All participants reported familiarity with SDM and agreed that the tool would be useful for their clinical practice. Key themes in participant feedback for the tool were (1) language and presentation; (2) content; and (3) implementation. Participants highlighted the importance of providing unbiased information and having companion tools with patient-centric language.

Conclusion

These data highlight the need for SDM tools for haemophilia A gene therapy. Key information to include in the tool are safety, efficacy, cost and detailed information on the gene therapy process. Data should be provided in an unbiased format and allow comparison to other treatments. The tool will be evaluated in clinical practice and refined as clinical trial data and real-world experience mature.     

Patterns of tertiary prophylaxis in Canadian adults with severe and moderately severe haemophilia B

From a young age patients with severe and moderately severe FIX deficiency (haemophilia B) can experience spontaneous or traumatic bleeding and joint destruction may result. The use of coagulation factor IX concentrate to prevent anticipated bleeding, as primary or secondary prophylaxis, has become a common and recommended practice in children. The current practice of using tertiary prophylaxis, in the presence of established joint arthropathy, in adults with haemophilia B is not well characterized. This observational study was conducted to gain a better understanding of the recent Canadian experience with tertiary prophylaxis in adults with severe and moderately severe haemophilia B. Data were collected from all eligible adult (≥ 18 years of age) males with baseline FIX:C ≤ 2% from seven Canadian Hemophilia Treatment centres over a 2‐year observation period from 2009 to 2011. Thirty‐four per cent of the 67 subjects with moderately severe haemophilia B were exposed to prophylaxis with the majority as continuous prophylaxis (≥45 weeks year^‐1). The severe subgroup (FIX:C < 1%) demonstrated a 52% exposure rate. None had primary prophylaxis exposure in childhood. Eighty‐one per cent used once or twice weekly infusion regimens and reported a median annual bleeding rate of five bleeds per year versus four bleeds per year for those using on‐demand treatment. Annual median factor utilization for all subjects using prophylaxis was 196 283 U year^‐1 compared to 46 361 U year^‐1 for on demand. Approximately 50% of adults with severe haemophilia B are using continuous tertiary prophylaxis in Canada, a practice likely to increase which warrants further study.