Induction of follicular growth and production of a normal hormonal milieu in spite of using a constant low dose of luteinizing hormone in women with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism

This study was designed to examine ovarian performance, i.e.follicular growth, normal steroidogenesis and luteal phase function,following the administration of multiple increasing doses ofhuman follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) with a constant lowdose of luteinizing hormone (LH) in women with isolated hypogonadotrophichypogonadism. Human meno–pausal gonadotrophin (HMG) wasused in the first treatment cycle, starting with 150 IU of LHand 150 IU of FSH per day, for 7 days. The dose was increaseddaily with 75 IU of LH and 75 IU of FSH for another 7 days ifno response was detected by serial ultrasound measurements andserumoestradiol determinations. In the second treatment cycle,a constant dose of 75 IU of LH (using HMG) was administeredper day and up to 150 IU of FSH (using urofollitrophin) wassupplemented. If no response was detected after 7 days of treatment,the dose of FSH was increased. For the final stage of ovulationinduction, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) was administeredin the presence of at least one follicle >17 mm in diameterbut with no more than three follicles >16mm in diameter.To verify the adequacy of the luteal phase, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamicstudy of -HCG, oestradiol and progesterone was performed followingthe second treatment cycle only. Ovarian stimulation using aconstant dose of 75 IU of LH and increasing doses of FSH upto 225 IU, resulted in normal follicular growth and hormonalmilieu. Both women showed normal luteal phase oestradiol andprogesterone production and both women conceived following thesecond treatment cycle     

Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone induced ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist multiple-dose protocol

BACKGROUND: Suppression of endogenous LH production by mid-follicular phase GnRH-antagonist administration in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocol using recombinant (rec) FSH preparations void of LH activity may potentially affect ovarian response and the outcome of IVF treatment. The present study prospectively assessed the effect of using a combination of recFSH and recLH on ovarian stimulation parameters and treatment outcome in a fixed GnRH-antagonist multiple dose protocol. METHODS: 127 infertile patients with an indication for IVF or ICSI were recruited and randomized (using sealed envelopes) to receive a starting dose of either 150 IU recFSH (follitropin alpha) or 150 IU recFSH plus 75 IU recLH (lutropin alpha) for ovarian hyperstimulation. GnRH-antagonist (Cetrorelix) 0.25 mg was administered daily from stimulation day 6 onwards up to and including the day of the administration of recombinant HCG (chorion gonadotropin alpha). Gonadotropin dose adjustments were allowed from stimulation day 6 onwards, HCG was administered as soon as three follicles > or =18 mm were present. The primary outcome parameter was treatment duration until administration of HCG. RESULTS: Exogenous LH did not shorten the time necessary to reach ovulation induction criteria. Serum estradiol (E(2)) and LH levels were significantly higher on the day of HCG administration in the recLH-supplemented group (1924.7 +/- 1256.4 vs 1488.3 +/- 824.0 pg/ml, P < 0.03), and 2.1 +/- 1.4 vs 1.4 +/- 1.5 IU/l, P < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Except for higher E(2) and LH levels on the day of HCG administration, no positive trend in favour of additional LH was found as defined by treatment outcome parameters.     

Rescue of IVF cycles by HMG in pituitary down-regulated normogonadotrophic young women characterized by a poor initial response to recombinant FSH

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of adding human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) during controlled ovarian stimulation in normoovulatory normogonadotrophic patients showing an initial suboptimal response to a standardized long protocol therapy with recombinant FSH (rFSH) (300 IU/day). METHODS: A total of 43 such patients were randomized in two groups. In Group A, 150 IU rFSH was substituted by 150 IU HMG after day 8 of stimulation. The stimulation protocol of Group B involved a simple increase of the daily rFSH dose to 375 IU after day 8. A total of 40 BMI and age matched patients with an optimal ovarian response formed the control group (Group C). RESULTS: The mean Group A serum concentration of oestradiol on the day of HCG administration and average number of oocytes retrieved were significantly higher than Group B (P < 0.001) and equivalent to Group C. A total of 10 pregnancies (50%) in Group A, 8 (34.8%) in Group B and 19 (47.5%) in the control group were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that LH supplementation improves the ovarian outcome in patients characterized by an inadequate initial response to rFSH therapy in a long protocol.     

The synergistic effects of clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin in the folliculogenesis of stimulated cycles as assessed by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Nal-Glu.

Clomiphene citrate (CC), alone or in combination with exogenous gonadotrophins, has been widely used in ovulation induction. CC promotes endogenous release of gonadotrophins, yet when used in combination with exogenous gonadotrophins, its contribution to folliculogenesis is difficult to assess. In order to determine the contribution of CC-induced endogenous gonadotrophin production to the overall ovarian stimulation in cycles treated with CC/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), Nal-Glu, a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist was administered. Fertile women (n = 10) undergoing ovarian stimulation and oocyte aspiration for the sole purpose of gamete donation were studied. Five women received CC (100 mg daily for 5 days) in conjunction with pure follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) 150 IU daily. Five women received HMG alone. Nal-Glu (50 micrograms/kg/day) was administered intramuscularly to both groups when the leading follicles reached a mean diameter of 16 mm. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) 10,000 IU was given when the largest follicles reached a mean diameter of 20-22 mm. A significant fall in serum oestradiol levels was observed in women given CC/FSH (37.9 +/- 7.3%) within the first 24 h of Nal-Glu administration. Serum luteinizing hormone (LH) decreased greater than 20% within 24 h of Nal-Glu administration and remained low throughout the rest of the treatment. No decrease in oestradiol levels was noted in cycles receiving HMG alone. With supplemental FSH, falling oestradiol levels in CC/FSH cycles rebounded and continued to rise until the day after HCG administration. Despite a drop in oestradiol in CC/FSH cycles, the aspirated oocytes exhibited no untoward effects. The fertilization and cleavage rates were similar, and pregnancies occurred in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Randomized controlled trial of follicle stimulating hormone versus human menopausal gonadotrophin in in-vitro fertilization*

The adverse effect of raised luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrationson reproductive outcome suggests that exogenous LH administrationfor ovarian stimulation may not be desirable. The aim of thisstudy was to compare the clinical pregnancy rates between folliclestimulating hormone (FSH) and human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) used in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. A total of232 infertile patients, with a mean duration of infertilityof 67.1 ± 32.9 months, were selected for IVF (femaleage <38 years, FSH <15 IU/1, and total motile sperm count>5x10⁶). A short (flare-up) protocol with daily leuprolideacetate was followed randomly from day 3 with FSH (n = 115)or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG; n = 117), at an initialdose of two ampoules per day. A maximum of three embryos wastransferred, and the luteal phase was supported with four dosesof HCG (2500 IU). No differences were observed between the twogroups in any of the cycle response variables except fertilizationrates per oocyte and per patient, both of which were significantlyhigher with FSH. Clinical pregnancy rates per cycle initiated,per oocyte retrieval and per embryo transfer were 19.1, 21.0and 22.7% respectively for FSH, and 12.0, 12.8 and 15.4% respectivelyfor HMG. Whilst these differences were not statistically significant,the results of this interim analysis suggest that HMG may beassociated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate than FSH.     

Revival of the natural cycles in in-vitro fertilization with the use of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix): a pilot study with minimal stimulation

Natural cycles were abandoned in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) embryo transfer, due to premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges--and subsequent high cancellation rates. In this study, we investigated the administration of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix) in the late follicular phase of natural cycles in patients undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 44 cycles from 33 healthy women [mean age 34.1 +/- 1.4 (range 26-36) years] were monitored, starting on day 8 by daily ultrasound and measurement of serum concentrations of oestradiol, LH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and progesterone. When plasma oestradiol concentrations reached 100-150 pg/ml, with a lead follicle between 12-14 mm diameter, a single injection (s.c.) of 0.5 mg (19 cycles) or 1 mg (25 cycles) Cetrorelix was administered. Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG; 150 IU) was administered daily at the time of the first injection of Cetrorelix, and repeated thereafter until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Four out of 44 cycles were cancelled (9.0%). No decline in follicular growth or oestradiol secretion was observed after Cetrorelix administration. A total of 40 oocyte retrievals leading to 22 transfers (55%) was performed. In 10 cycles (25%), no oocyte was obtained. Fertilization failure despite ICSI occurred in six cycles (15%). In two patients the embryo was arrested at the 2 pronuclear (PN) stage. The stimulation was minimal (4.7 +/- 1.4 HMG ampoules). A total of seven clinical pregnancies was obtained (32.0% per transfer, 17.5% per retrieval), of which five are ongoing. Thus, a spontaneous cycle and the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix in single dose administration could represent a first-choice IVF treatment with none of the complications and risks of current controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols, and an acceptable success rate.     

Endocrinology: Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone and ovarian response in gonadotrophin-deficient women

Seven women suffering from hypogonadism due to previous hypophysectomy,isolated gonadotrophin deficiency, or Kallman's syndrome [medianage 39 years (range 24–45)] volunteered to participatein a study to assess ovarian response following multiple-doseadministration of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone(rhFSH; Org 32489). Baseline serum FSH and luteinizing hormone(LH) concentrations were 0.25 (<0.05–1.15) IU/l and0.06 (<0.05–0.37) IU/l, respectively. Subjects receiveddaily i.m. injections of rhFSH for 3 weeks (week 1: 75 IU/day,week 2: 150 IU/day, week 3: 225 IU/day). Blood sampling andsonographic investigations were performed on alternate days.Steady-state FSH concentrations were reached 3–5 daysafter alterations of the doses administered. Maximum FSH concentrationswere between 7.1 and 11.8 IU/l, whereas serum LH concentrationsremained unchanged. Due to absent follicle development and lackof a rise in immunoreactive inhibin (INH) (response failurepossibly due to early ovarian failure or resistant ovary syndrome)in two subjects, analysis of ovarian response was restrictedto five volunteers. Serum androstenedione levels showed no significantchanges during rhFSH administration. Although serum immunoreactiveINH concentrations reached normal late follicular values [659(388–993) IU/l], serum oestradiol revealed only a minorincrease [77 (18–210) pmol/I]. Moreover, growth of (multiple)ovarian follicles was observed up to pre-ovulatory sizes (>15mm) in these patients. It may be concluded from the presentstudy that (i) rhFSH exhibits no intrinsic LH activity; (ii)rhFSH stimulation in hypogondotrophic women resulted in an immunoreactiveINH rise which was similar to that in normal women, whereasin contrast only a minor increase in oestradiol concentrationswas observed (suggesting normal granulosa cell function andlow availability of androgens as a substrate for aromatization);(iii) despite the minimal oestrogen increase, ovarian folliclesdeveloped normally to the pre-ovulatory stage.     

The prognostic value of basal luteinizing hormone:follicle-stimulating hormone ratio in the treatment of patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome by assisted reproduction techniques

One of the main endocrinological disturbances in patients withpolycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is the increased baselineconcentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) and consequentlya high LHrfollicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) ratio. The aimof this study was to assess the relationship between the baselineLH:FSH ratio with the stimulation response and the miscarriagerisk in PCOS women stimulated for assisted reproduction techniques(ART) with and without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue(GnRHa). Two groups of PCOS patients were analysed retrospectively.Group A (n = 20, 20 cycles) consisted of women stimulated withhuman menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), and group B (n = 128,162 cycles) comprised women stimulated with buserelin-long/HMG.LH and FSH concentrations were measured during the early follicularphase (days 4–6) in a preceding spontaneous or progestininducedcycle. The following parameters were assessed: number of folliclesdeveloped, number of oocytes obtained and percentage of matureoocytes, as well as number of abortions and live births. Ingroup A, the baseline LH:FSH ratio was correlated inverselywith the number of follicles developed (P < 0.05), the numberof oocytes obtained (P < 0.05) and the percentage of matureoocytes (P < 0.05). In group B, no correlation was foundbetween the LH:FSH ratio and the number of follicles and oocytes,because their numbers were relatively constant irrespectiveof the baseline LH:FSH ratio, but a significant inverse correlationwas noted with the percentage of mature oocytes (P < 0.001).However, a comparison of the slopes of the curve indicated abetter correlation between the LH:FSH ratio and the percentageof mature oocytes in group A than in group B (P < 0.05).These findings were also confirmed when patients were subdividedaccording to the LH:FSH ratio (<3 or 3=3). Furthermore, inwomen who miscarried, the mean LH:FSH ratio was significantlyhigher than in women having a live birth. In conclusion, inPCOS patients stimulated with HMG, a high basal LH:FSH ratioappears to have an adverse effect on the number of folliclesand oocytes, as well as on oocyte maturity. On the other hand,the administration of GnRHa in the long protocol seems to reversethis detrimental effect on follicle and oocyte development.Furthermore, a higher LH:FSH ratio seems to predict a greaterpossibility for miscarriage, despite the use of GnRHa.     

Profound LH suppression after GnRH antagonist administration is associated with a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rate in IVF

BACKGROUND: The significance of suppressed LH levels in GnRH antagonist cycles for IVF outcome is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the association between LH levels and ongoing pregnancy achievement after GnRH antagonist initiation in IVF cycles. METHODS: Ovarian stimulation with a fixed dose of 200 IU recombinant FSH and daily GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) 0.25 mg from day 6 of stimulation was initiated in 116 women. Patients were not pretreated with an oral contraceptive. Induction of final oocyte maturation was performed with HCG 10,000 IU as soon as three follicles of > or =17 mm were present in ultrasound, and was followed by oocyte pick-up, conventional IVF or ICSI, and embryo transfer. The luteal phase was supplemented with vaginal progesterone. RESULTS: A significant decrease of both ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate was present across groups of patients with increasing LH levels. The highest implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate was present in those patients with LH levels on day 8 of stimulation < or =0.5 IU/l. CONCLUSIONS: Profound suppression of LH on day 8 of stimulation is associated with a significantly higher chance of achieving an ongoing pregnancy. More studies are necessary to evaluate this phenomenon further.     

The effectiveness and safety of recombinant human LH to support follicular development induced by recombinant human FSH in WHO group I anovulation: evidence from a multicentre study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG), a urinary extract containing a fixed combination of LH and FSH, was the only source of exogenous LH for women with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism undergoing ovulation induction with gonadotrophins. Recombinant human LH (rLH) is now available for clinical use, providing a new treatment option but clinical data on its use are scanty. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of rLH combined with recombinant FSH (rFSH) to induce follicular development and ovulation in World Health Organization (WHO) group I anovulatory women. METHODS: We included in this multicentre study 38 hypogonadotrophic anovulatory (WHO group I) women. Patients received 150 IU/day rFSH and 75 IU/day rLH (with the possibility of dose adjustment) as a single s.c. injection for up to three cycles with a total of 84 treatment cycles. RESULTS: Sufficient follicular growth was observed in 79 (94%) out of 84 initiated cycles. The 75 IU rLH dose was found to be effective in most treatment cycles (94%) and only five cycles in three patients required daily dose increase. Overall, HCG was administered to trigger ovulation in 67 (80%) of the 84 cycles while it was withheld in 12 cycles (14%) due to ovarian hyper-response and five cycles (6%) were cancelled for insufficient follicular growth. The pregnancy rate per started treatment cycle and per cycle given HCG was 18 and 22.4% respectively. Pregnancy was achieved by 15 (39.5%) of the 38 patients. Mild to moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in three patients. Local tolerance was good. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that combined rFSH and rLH treatment induces follicular growth, ovulation and pregnancy in a good proportion of hypogonadotrophic anovulatory patients and is well tolerated. The doses of 150 IU rFSH and 75 IU rLH daily seem the most appropriate but in a small minority of patients doses >75 IU rLH/day may be necessary.     

Endocrinology: Follicle stimulating hormone alone supports follicle growth and oocyte development in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist-treated monkeys

Both follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone(LH) are proposed requirements for follicular growth and steroidogenesis;however, the role of LH in primate folliculogenesis is unclear.Follicular stimulation by recombinant human FSH (n = 5) withand without recombinant LH (1: 1; n = 6) following 90 days ofgonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (Antide) treatmentin macaques was evaluated. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG)was administered when six follicles >4 mm were observed.Oocytes were aspirated 27 h later and inseminated in vitro.Chronic Antide reduced serum oestradiol and bioactive LH toconcentrations observed in hypophysectomized rhesus monkeys.Multiple follicular growth required a longer interval followingrecombinant FSH (12 ± 1 days) than recombinant FSH +recombinant LH (9 ± 0.2 days), but the total number offollicles/animal did not differ between groups. The day priorto HCG, oestradiol concentrations were 4-fold less followingrecombinant FSH compared to recombinant FSH + recombinant LH.With recombinant FSH, more oocytes completed meiosis to metaphaseII(51%) and fertilized (89 ± 5%) relative to recombinantFSH + recombinant LH (12 and 52 ± 11% respectively).Follicular growth and maturation in LH-deficient macaques occurredwith FSH alone. Thus, LH is not required for folliculogenesisin primates. Higher fertilization rates following follicularstimulation with FSH alone suggest that the presence of LH withFSH (1: 1) during the pre-ovulatory interval impairs gametogenicevents in the periovulatory period.     

A double-blind cross-over controlled study to evaluate the effect of human biosynthetic growth hormone on ovarian stimulation in previous poor responders to in-vitro fertilization

The effect of exogenous human biosynthetic growth hormone (HGH;12 IU/day; Norditropin, Novo-Nordisk) on the response to ovarianstimulation using a buserelin/human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) regimen was assessed in women who had previously showna ‘poor response’ in spite of increasing doses ofHMG. Forty patients were recruited into a prospective double-blindplacebo-controlled study. The serum follicle stimulating hormone(FSH) on day 2–5 of a menstrual cycle (< 10 IU/I) wasused to exclude any peri-menopausal candidates. The urinary24 h GH secretion was normal in all patients. Thirty-three patientscompleted the study with 21 patients having human chorionicgonadotrophin (HCG) in both arms, thus providing a completeset of placebo control data. Of these 21 patients, the administrationof HGH compared to the placebo cycle resulted in increased serumconcentrations of fasting insulin on the 8th (median 3.9 versus5.8 mU/I; P < 0.0005) and13th (median 4.4 versus 5.8 mU/I;P < 0.05) day of HMG in those cycles receiving HGH. After8 days of co-treatment with HGH the number of cohort follicles(14–16.9 mm) was significantly increased, but this changewas not sustained on the day of HCG administration. No statisticaldifference in the serum oestradiol on the 8th day of HMG orday of HCG, length of the follicular phase, total dose of HMGused, or the number of oocytes collected was seen between theplacebo or HGH cycles. This study demonstrates that HGH doesnot improve the ovarian response to ovulation induction in previouspoor responders.     

GnRH antagonists and mild ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination: a randomized study comparing different gonadotrophin dosages

BACKGROUND: The precise role of GnRH antagonists in the armamentarium of drugs for stimulation of ovulation associated with intrauterine insemination remains to be clarified. In this study, we have compared two different protocols employing GnRH antagonists in order to determine the lower effective dose of gonadotrophins to use. METHODS: Sixty-six couples with unexplained infertility or moderate male subfertility were recruited. Starting on day 3 of the cycle, 32 patients were randomized to receive 50 IU of recombinant FSH per day, whereas 34 were treated with 50 IU of recombinant FSH on alternate days. Women received the GnRH antagonist Ganirelix at a dose of 0.25 mg per day starting on the day in which a leading follicle > or =14 mm in mean diameter was visualized, until HCG administration. Insemination was performed 34 h after HCG injection. RESULTS: The regimen with daily recombinant FSH was associated with a lower rate of mono-ovulation (53.3% versus 78.8%, P=0.06) but also with a higher clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle (34.4% versus 5.9%, P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: A protocol of recombinant FSH 50 IU daily and GnRH antagonist may represent an effective and safe regimen for ovulation induction associated with intrauterine insemination.     

Endocrinology: Luteal function following ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome patients using exogenous gonadotrophins in combination with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist

The luteal phase was studied in 12 polycystic ovary syndrome(PCOS) patients following ovulation induction using exogenousgonadotrophins combined with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormoneagonist (GnRH-a). Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) was precededby 3 weeks of treatment with GnRH-a (buserelin; 1200 µg/dayintra-nasally) and administered in a step-down dose regimenstarting with 225 IU/day i.m. GnRH-a was withheld the day beforeadministration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG; 10 000IU i.m.). Blood sampling and ultrasound monitoring was performedevery 2–3 days until menses. The luteal phase was significantlyshorter in PCOS patients as compared to eight regularly cyclingcontrols: 8.8 (3.3–11.4) days [median(range)] versus 12.8(8.9–15.9) days (P = 0.01). Median peak values for progesteronedid not show significant differences comparing both groups:52.3 (17.1–510.3) nmol/l versus 43.0 (31.2–71.1)nmol/l, respectively (P = 0.8). The interval between the dayof the progesterone peak and return to baseline was significantlyshorter in the PCOS patients than in controls: 2.5 (0.3–4.9)days versus 4.2 (3.9–10.5) days (P < 0.005). Luteinizinghormone (LH) concentrations during the luteal phase as reflectedby area under the curve were significantly lower in PCOS ascompared to controls: 4.4 (1.6–21.0) IU/l x days and 49.0(27.8–79.6) IU/l x days, respectively (P < 0.001).In conclusion, patients with PCOS may suffer from insufficientluteal phases after ovulation induction using HMG/HCG in combinationwith a GnRH-a. The corpus luteum apparently lacks the supportof endogenous LH and may be stimulated only by the pre-ovulatoryinjection of HCG. Potential involvement of adjuvant GnRH-a medicationor HCG itself in luteal suppression of endogenous gonadotrophinsecretion, and the importance of luteal function for pregnancyrates following treatment, warrant further studies.     

Spontaneous luteinizing hormone surges can be reliably prevented by the timely administration of a gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist (Nal-Glu) during the late follicular phase.

A new gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist (Nal-Glu) was used during the late follicular phase of the natural cycle in order to prevent spontaneous surges of luteinizing hormone (LH). Eight regularly ovulating women (group 1) received two injections of Nal-Glu (5 mg) administered 48 h apart when plasma oestradiol levels exceeded 125 pg/ml. Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG, 225 IU) was administered simultaneously with Nal-Glu and repeated every 12 h thereafter until either a spontaneous LH surge occurred or human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG, 5000 IU) was administered. HCG was arbitrarily administered 48 h after the second Nal-Glu injection. Six other women (group 2) receiving only HMG served as controls. In seven of the eight women in group 1, LH and progesterone remained low for 96 h following Nal-Glu, i.e. until HCG administration. In the remaining woman in this group, LH started to rise 12 h before HCG injection. In this group, Nal-Glu did not interfere with follicular development or the plasma profile of oestradiol. All women developed one single dominant follicle with the exception of one subject who had already spontaneously developed two dominant follicles prior to administration of Nal-Glu and HMG. In group 2, LH rose spontaneously in all women before the planned HCG injection. The luteal phase was apparently not altered by Nal-Glu. These results suggest that Nal-Glu administration during the late follicular phase of natural cycles supported by HMG, can prevent the spontaneous LH surge while not interfering with follicular growth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Endocrinology: Different follicle stimulating hormone/luteinizing hormone ratios for ovarian stimulation

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether reducingthe amount of luteinizing hormone (LH) in gonadotrophic preparationsimpairs follicular growth in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cyclesduring suppression of endogenous LH levels. A selected groupof 20 IVF patients was randomly divided into two groups. Onegroup was treated with Org 31338 [follicle stimulating hormone(FSH)/LH 3: 1], the other group with Metrodin® (purifiedFSH), both during pituitary down-regulation with buserelin.A fixed daily dose of 150 IU FSH i.m. was given. Serum concentrationsof FSH, LH, oestradiol and progesterone were determined frequentlyand serial ultrasound examinations were performed. Multiplefollicular growth with concomitant rise of oestradiol levelswas observed in all cycles. The duration of the stimulationphase was shorter in the group treated with Org 31338 than inthe group treated with Metrodin. The number of follicles andoocytes and the fertilization rate was larger and the mean embryoquality was higher in the Org 31338 group, but the differencesdid not reach statistical significance. No significant differenceswere found in hormonal values. In women with normal endocrineprofiles, lowering of the LH activity in gonadotrophic preparationsduring gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist treatment resultsin adequate ovarian stimulation. However, a preparation withsome LH needed a shorter stimulation than a purified FSH preparation.Whether the other beneficial effects of Org 31338 also occurin a larger population needs further investigation.     

A prospective,randomized, controlled trial comparing highly purified hMG with recombinant FSH in women undergoing ICSI: ovarian response and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND: To assess the clinical profile and efficacy in assisted reproductive treatment of a new human-derived highly purified (HP) menotropin, we compared HP hMG and recombinant (r) FSHalpha use in ICSI within a prospective, randomized, controlled study. METHODS: 100 infertile women were treated with HP hMG (50 patients) or rFSHalpha (50 patients). All patients received the same daily gonadotrophin dose (150 IU) following GnRH agonist suppression (long regimen) until more than three follicles >17 mm and estradiol (E(2)) levels >600 pg/ml were reached. Patients were monitored with daily LH, FSH, hCG, estradiol (E(2)), progesterone, and testosterone measurements; and alternate day pelvic ultrasound. RESULTS: Treatment duration (11.1 +/- 0.4 versus 12.9 +/- 0.5 days, P < 0.05) and gonadotrophin dose (22.4 +/- 1.0 versus 27.0 +/- 1.5 ampoules, P < 0.05) were lower in the HP hMG group. Conversely, peak pre-ovulatory E(2) (1342 +/- 127 versus 933 +/- 109 pg/ml, P < 0.005); and area under the curve of E(2) (3491 +/- 350 versus 2602 +/- 349 pg/ml.day, P < 0.05), immunoreactive serum FSH (65.9 +/- 2.1 versus 48.8 +/- 1.8 IU/l.day, P < 0.001). and hCG (1.7 +/- 0.3 versus 0.0 +/- 0.0 IU/l/day, P < 0.001) during treatment were higher in the HP hMG group. Cycle cancellation rates, transferred embryo number, pregnancy rates per started cycle (30 versus 28%) and per embryo transfer (35 versus 35%) and miscarriage rates (6 versus 6%) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: HP hMG treatment was associated with: (i) a more efficient patient response, as reflected by reduced treatment duration and gonadotrophin requirements; (ii) increased serum levels of hCG, E(2), and immunoreactive FSH during treatment; (iii) an ICSI outcome indistinguishable from rFSHalpha.     

Comparison of luteal phase profile in gonadotrophin stimulated cycles with or without a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to explore luteal phase hormone profiles in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles with or without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist therapy during intrauterine insemination (IUI). Forty-one infertile couples were recruited in this randomized clinical study. METHODS: The 19 patients included in group A were treated for 21 cycles with recombinant FSH 150 IU/day starting from day 3 of the cycle and with the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix at the dose of 0.25 mg/day starting from the day in which a follicle with a mean diameter of > or =14 mm was seen at ultrasound scan. Cetrorelix was administered until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. The 22 patients included in group B were administered recombinant FSH alone at the same dosage for 27 cycles. RESULTS: The two treatment groups showed a similar increase in progesterone concentration during the luteal phase. In the mid-luteal phase (day 6 after HCG), oestradiol concentrations in group B were significantly higher compared with group A (P < 0.05) but the oestradiol:progesterone ratio was similar in the two groups. Serum LH was completely suppressed during the follicular phase only in group A, concomitantly with GnRH antagonist administration. A total of six pregnancies, all ongoing, were achieved (14.3% per patient and 12.2% per cycle), equally distributed in group A and in group B. CONCLUSION: GnRH antagonists can be safely administered in gonadotrophin-stimulated IUI cycles without luteal phase supplementation because no deleterious effects of GnRH antagonist administration were noted on luteal progesterone concentration or on the duration of the luteal phase.     

Accumulation of human chorionic gonadotrophin in the serum of patients during in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles with Pergonal

We examined the possible contribution of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) in Pergonal to the serum luteinizing hormone (LH)-likebioactivity in 10 patients (median age32 years, range 28–38)with tubal infertility who were undergoing in-vitro fertilization(IVF), together with 19 controls (median age30 years, range21–43). IVF patients were treated with clomiphene (50mg twice daily) over days 2–6 and Pergonal (150 IU i.m.)daily from day 5 until at least day 10. Serum LH was measuredby fluoro-immunometric assay (I-LH) and in-vitro Leydig cellbioassay (B-LH). Serum HCG was measured by fluoro-immunometricassay. The data were analysed by paired two-tailed t-test, followinglogarithmic transformation. From days 1–5, there was anincrease in serum B-LH (mean, 95% confidence intervals givenin parentheses) from 8.3 (6.8, 10.2) IU/1 to 11.7 (9.8, 13.9)IU/1 [P= 0.004], and in serum I-LH from 4.5 (3.7, 5.4) IU/1to 5.4 (4.6, 6.3) IU/1 [P= 0.002]. From days 5–8, therewas a rise in B-LH to 16.6 (12.6, 21.9) IU/1 [P= 0.023]. Therise in I-LH to 6.3 (5.1, 7.8) IU/1 [P= 0.081] failed to reachsignificance. Furthermore, serum HCG was <<0.75 IU/1 untilafter Pergonal was administered on day 5, then rose to a plateauon day 8 at 1.2(0.8, 1.6) IU/1. Serum HCG in the controls remained<<0.75 IU/1 throughout. We conclude there is a disproportionateincrease in serum B-LH compared to I-LH from days 5–8,corresponding with a rise in serum HCG and the commencementof treatment with Pergonal. The HCG in Pergonal may be contributingto an undesirable rise in serum LH-like bioactivity, which mightreduce the success rate of IVF.     

Andrology: Failure of oestrogen induced luteinizing hormone surge in women treated with mifepristone (RU 486) every day for 30 days

It has been demonstrated previously that administration of theantiprogestin mifepristone (RU 486; 1–5 mg daily) inhibitsor delays both the pre-ovulatory luteinizing hormone (LH) surgeand ovulation. To investigate this mechanism, dynamic testsof pituitary ovarian function were performed in six healthywomen before and during the administration of mifepristone (2mg daily for 30 days). On day 9 of the control and treatmentcycles, samples of blood were collected every 15 min over 12h for measurement of LH concentration. After 10 h, the responsivenessof the pituitary was tested by the i.v. injection of 10 µgof gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH). On day 10 of thecontrol and treatment cycles, two patches releasing 200 µg/dayof oestradiol were applied to skin on the abdomen for 3 days.Blood was collected at 24, 48, 59, 72, 81 and 96 h after applicationof the oestrogen patches for the measurement of gonadotrophinand ovarian hormone concentrations. Follicular development continuedin all women during their treatment with mifepristone, and ovulationwas suppressed (four women) or delayed (two women). There wasno significant difference in the basal concentration of LH betweenthe control and treatment cycles (mean ± SE; 5.5 ±0.4 versus 7.7 ± 0.4 IU/l respectively), or in the frequency(interpulse interval, 101 ± 12 versus 105 ± 13min respectively) and the amplitude (2.1 ± 0.4 versus2.6 ± 0.4 IU/l respectively) of LH pulses. The responseto GnRH was similar. On day 10, the basal concentrations ofLH, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin, oestradioland progesterone and the diameter of the dominant follicle (15.7± 1.8 versus 13.3 ± 1.9 mm) were similar duringcontrol and treatment cycles. In control cycles, there weresignificant increases in the concentrations of LH and FSH within72 h of application of the oestrogen patches. During treatmentcycles, concentrations of FSH and LH remained low, and weresignificantly lower than the values observed during controlcycles (P < 0.006). We conclude that the antiprogestin mifepristonedisrupts ovulation by inhibiting the positive feedback effectof oestrogens and, hence, prevents or delays the generationof a pre-ovulatory LH surge.