Need for background suppression in contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography.

To determine if background suppression is beneficial for peripheral magnetic resonance angiography (pMRA), nonsubtracted, subtracted, and fat-saturated contrast-enhanced (CE) pMRA were compared in 10 patients with peripheral arterial disease. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), as well as venous enhancement and subjective interpretability, were determined in a station-by-station fashion for each technique. In three patients X-ray angiography was available as a standard of reference. SNRs and CNRs were significantly higher for fat-saturated vs. the other two techniques (P = 0.005). Subjective interpretability was best for subtracted data sets in the lower-leg station. In the iliac station, fat-saturated data sets were considered to have significantly lower interpretability than subtracted data sets. Venous enhancement occurred significantly more often in the lower-leg station with the fat-saturated technique. The value of subtraction depends on the hardware one has available and is a useful tool if dedicated surface coils are used. Background suppression by means of magnitude subtraction leads to the best lower-leg image interpretability. Care must be taken to avoid venous enhancement in the lower-leg station when using fat saturation.     

MR angiography of the carotid arteries: parameters affecting image quality

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to evaluate the relationship between dose levels of contrast medium and image quality in magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the carotid arteries with fluoroscopically monitored, manually triggered, elliptically ordered image acquisitions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with clinical indications for angiography of the carotid arteries were examined with MR at 1.5 T by using a fluoroscopically monitored, manually triggered, elliptically ordered pulse sequence with the administration of one of three different volumes of gadolinium-based contrast medium. The signal intensities of the vessel lumen and the surrounding tissues were measured in single partitions at the origin of the common carotid artery, the carotid bifurcation, and the intracranial internal carotid arteries. The contrast-to-noise ratio in these regions of interest also was measured. Maximum intensity projection image quality was appraised for blurring, artifacts, venous enhancement, background suppression, and contrast medium distribution. RESULTS: No artifacts or venous enhancement was observed. The position of the fluoroscopic section affected the distribution of contrast medium along the vessel, as evidenced by the difference between the contrast-to-noise ratio at the origin of the common carotid artery and the ratio at the carotid bifurcation and the intracranial internal carotid arteries (P < .01). The contrast medium dose administered was strongly correlated with image quality (r = 0.90). CONCLUSION: Contrast medium dose is related to image quality in MR angiography of the carotid arteries performed with elliptical ordering, fluoroscopic monitoring, and manual triggering.     

Scoutless stepping-table peripheral contrast-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a scoutless method, termed EZ-STEP, for stepping-table peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This scoutless method involves the use of a stepping-table, fast 3D MRA acquisition that incorporates spatially nonselective radiofrequency (RF) pulses for excitation to reduce the repetition time (TR). The sequence was tested in a phantom. The EZ-STEP protocol was optimized in four healthy volunteers and used in 15 subjects. The image quality was scored in a blinded fashion and compared with conventional MRA in eight patients. RESULTS: The acquisition speed of the EZ-STEP sequence was approximately 30% faster in the phantom study compared to the conventional MRA sequence. The total examination time for EZ-STEP was 6 minutes, compared to an average of 23 minutes for conventional MRA. The average image quality scores for EZ-STEP and conventional MRA for stations 1-3 were 3.50 vs. 3.06 (P = 0.087), 3.53 vs. 3.00 (P = 0.033), and 2.97 vs. 2.50 (P = 0.090), respectively. CONCLUSION: EZ-STEP is a more efficient method than the conventional approach for stepping-table peripheral CE-MRA, and provides comparable or better image quality. This method shortens the examination time substantially and eliminates the risk of failing to image a vessel because of improper positioning of the scan volume.     

Time-of-flight MR angiography of kidney transplants

The aim of the study was to apply time-of-flight MR angiography to renal transplant arteries with comparison of two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) sequences and to correlate the findings with colour flow sonography (CFS) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). A total of 102 MR studies were performed in 101 patients: 87 with the 2D-FLASH sequence (18 repeated after Gd-DOTA administration), 49 with the 3D-FISP (both in 34). All patients were also studied with CFS and 15 with intra-arterial DSA. The 3D sequence produced good-quality MR angiograms in 94% of cases (82% in 2D). Gd-DOTA infusion improved the quality of the 2D angiograms in 7 of 18 cases. Only these patients were included in the remainder of the evaluation (90 patients with 103 arteries). CFS showed 72 normal and 10 abnormal arteries. In this group, the 2D sequence led to 7 (12%) false positives of stenosis and the 3D sequence yielded 1 (3%). Correlation between MR angiography and DSA was obtained for 21 arteries (15 patients) with suspicion of arterial complications. The 2D-FLASH (n = 13) and the 3D-FISP (n = 12) MR sequences allowed the correct diagnosis of all main artery complications (14 stenoses and 4 thromboses) without any false negatives and without discordance when both sequences were performed (n = 4). In the 3 other cases with a normal main artery, 2 segmental thromboses were correctly identified by both sequences and 1 stenosis of a segmental branch was correctly identified by the 2D sequence only but misdiagnosed as a thrombosis with the 3D sequence. Grading of the severity of stenoses was inaccurate with both sequences. It is concluded that the 3D time-of-flight MR sequence provides better MR angiograms than the 2D, with fewer false positives for stenosis. No false-negative arterial complications were noted. Correspondence to: N. Grenier     

Validation of injection parameters for catheter-directed intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Catheter-directed intraarterial (IA) injections of gadolinium contrast agents may be used during endovascular interventions with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging guidance. Injection protocols require further validation. Using a flow phantom and swine, the authors aimed to (a) measure the optimal arterial gadolinium concentration ([Gd]) required for MR angiography and (b) validate a proposed IA injection protocol for gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For in vitro experiments, the authors placed a catheter in the aorta of an aorto-renal-iliac flow phantom. Injected [Gd], injection rates, and aortic blood flow rates were varied independently for 36 separate IA gadolinium injections. The authors performed 2D and 3D MR angiography with a fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence. For subsequent in vivo experiments, they selectively placed catheters within the aorta, renal artery, or common iliac artery of three pigs. Injection rate and injected [Gd] were varied. The authors performed 32 separate IA gadolinium injections for 2D MR angiography. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were compared for the various combinations of injection rate and injected [Gd]. RESULTS: In vitro, an arterial [Gd] of 2%-4% produced an optimal SNR for 2D MR angiography, and 3%-5% was best for 3D MR angiography. In swine, an arterial [Gd] of 1%-4% produced an optimal SNR. In the phantom and swine experiments, SNR was maintained at higher injection rates by inversely varying the injected [Gd]. CONCLUSION: Dilute arterial [Gd] is required for optimal IA gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. To maintain an optimal SNR, injection rates and injected [Gd] should be varied inversely. The postulated injection protocol was validated.     

Evaluation of the iliac arteries: Comparison of two-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography

We compared dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight (3DTOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with two-dimensional time of flight (2DTOF) MRA with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo (C-MON) and conventional angiography (CA) when it was available. C-MON re-orders the normal data acquisition to minimize ghosting artifacts generated by pulsatile flow. The initial phase of the study involved optimization of parameters and comparison C-MON with no C=MON in eight patients and volunteers. The final phase of the study involved 53 patients who were imaged with contrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA and 2DTOF MRA with C-MON. Thirty of these patients also had CA. In the initial phase, 2DTOF MRA with C-MON was found to be equal (n = 3) or superior (n = 5) to 2DTOF without C-MON. In the final phase, the agreement among all imaging modalities varied from substantial to almost perfect (Cohen's _K = .6-.83). The lowest agreement was using 2DTOF to evaluate the external iliac segments. The among suggested treatments varied from substantial to almost perfect for all imaging modalities (Cohen's _K = .73–93). The diagnostic efficacies of 2DTOF with C-MON and contrast-enhanced 3DTOF were high overall, with the lowest value being a specificity of 63% for one reader in the evaluation of an external iliac segment using 2DTOF. In summary, 2DTOF with C-MON helped to eliminate artifacts due to pulsatility in the iliac arterial segments. In our experience, both dynamic constrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA and 2DTOF MRA with C-MON performed well in the evaluation of the iliac arteries. Both studies have high interobserver agreement and high diagnostic efficacy. Contrast-enhanced 3DTOF MRA should be reserved for situations in which the iliac vessels are extremely tortuous or occluded or the external iliac segments are poorly seen.     

Use of a blood-pool contrast agent for MR-guided vascular procedures: feasibility of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the dose dependency of the intravascular signal intensity after injection of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particles (SH U 555 C) in a rabbit model studied with a low-field-strength magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system. The results were used to facilitate MR-guided vascular procedures in a pig. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were performed at 0.2 T. To determine the optimum USPIO (or SH U 555 C) dose for intravascular interventions, the authors acquired coronal three-dimensional MR angiographic images in 12 rabbits after injection of four dose levels (10, 20, 30, and 40 micromol of iron per kilogram body weight). The intraaortic signal intensities were measured in user-defined regions of interest. For numerical analysis, signal intensity enhancement was computed. Subsequently MR image-guided procedures were performed in USPIO-enhanced vessels in one pig. RESULTS: The signal intensity evaluation shows a clear-cut dose dependence in both early and late phases after administration of SH U 555 C. A high-spatial-resolution MR angiogram acquired 20 minutes after injection yielded the best results with the highest dose (40 micromol of iron per kilogram); at that dose, intravascular enhancement was sufficient for vascular procedures for 60 minutes after injection. CONCLUSION: SH U 555 C is a promising contrast agent for MR angiography and MR-guided vascular procedures in an open low-field-strength MR imager.     

Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: a pilot comparison of maximum intensity projection, multiplanar reformatting, and 3D volume-rendering postprocessing algorithms

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors compared diagnostic accuracy of maximum intensity projection (MIP), multiplanar reformatting (MPR), and three-dimensional (3D) volume rendering (VR) in the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the renal arteries. They hypothesized that VR is as accurate as or more accurate than MIP and MPR at depicting renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 28 consecutive patients who underwent gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the renal arteries. Studies were postprocessed to display images in MIP, MPR, and VR formats. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), when performed (nine of 28 patients), was the standard for comparison. For each main renal artery, an estimate of percentage stenosis was made for any stenoses detected by three independent radiologists. For calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, MR angiographic stenosis estimates were categorized as mild (0%-39%), moderate (40%-69%), or severe (> or = 70%). DSA stenosis estimates of 70% or greater were considered hemodynamically significant. RESULTS: Analysis of variance demonstrated MIP estimates of stenosis were statistically greater than VR estimates in two readers and greater than MPR estimates in all readers for all patients. MIP images also showed the largest mean difference from DSA stenosis estimates for all three readers. For both VR and MPR, mean differences between MR angiographic stenoses estimates and DSA estimates reached significance for only one reader, whereas, for MIP versus DSA, mean differences reached significance for all three readers. Although not statistically significant compared with DSA, accuracies of VR (87%) and MPR (89%) were greater than that of MIP (81%). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, MIP was the least accurate of the three image display algorithms tested. VR and MPR yielded similar values for each method of comparison.     

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the run-off vasculature: intraindividual comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine with gadopentetate dimeglumine

PURPOSE: To compare intraindividually gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) for multi-station MR Angiography of the run-off vessels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one randomized healthy volunteers received either Gd-BOPTA or Gd-DTPA as a first injection and then the other agent as a second injection after a minimum interval of 6 days. Each agent was administered at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight followed by a 25-mL saline flush at a single constant flow rate of 0.8 mL/second. Images were acquired sequentially at the level of the pelvis, thigh, and calf using a fast three-dimensional (3D) gradient echo sequence. Source, subtracted source, maximum intensity projection (MIP), and subtracted MIP image sets from each examination were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively on a segmental basis involving nine vascular segments. RESULTS: Significantly (P < 0.05) higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were noted for Gd-BOPTA compared to Gd-DTPA, with the more pronounced differences evident in the more distal vessels. Qualitative assessmentrevealed no differences in the abdominal vasculature, a preference for Gd-BOPTA in the pelvic vasculature, and markedly better performance for Gd-BOPTA in the femoral and tibial vasculature. Summation of individual diagnostic quality scores for each segment revealed a significantly (P = 0.0001) better performance for Gd-BOPTA compared to Gd-DTPA. CONCLUSION: Greater vascular enhancement of the run-off vasculature is obtained after Gd-BOPTA, particularly in the smaller more distal vessels. Enhancement differences are not merely dose dependent, but may be due to different vascular enhancement characteristics of the agents.     

Dual-velocity continuously moving table acquisition for contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography.

Acquisition of MR angiographic data of the peripheral vasculature during continuous table motion offers certain advantages over fixed station approaches, such as the elimination of wasted time moving between stations and the ability to form a seamless image of the extended field of view. However, it has recently been demonstrated that there is an approximate twofold reduction in contrast bolus velocity as it moves from the thighs to the calves. This can potentially cause a mismatch of the moving table with the contrast peak, resulting in the table outpacing the contrast bolus distally. In this work we describe a modification to the continuous table motion technique allowing two table velocities: a high (ca. 3.6 cm/sec) velocity from the abdomen to the thighs and a low (ca. 1.6 cm/sec) velocity distally. Implications of the nonconstant velocity on k-space sampling are described, and it is shown that lateral resolution is improved for the low-velocity region. Correction for table deceleration during the transition time between high and low velocities is demonstrated. Contrast-enhanced studies in 15 volunteers are free of table-motion-related artifact and suggest improved depiction of the contrast bolus distally.     

Analysis of subtraction methods in three-dimensional contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of three image subtraction algorithms designed to improve arterial conspicuity in first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three subtraction methods were analyzed through computer simulations, phantom studies, and clinical studies. These algorithms were: complex subtraction, magnitude subtraction, and maximum intensity projection subtraction. RESULTS: In high resolution three-dimensional imaging, maximum intensity projection subtraction generally yields the best background suppression. Complex subtraction is effective in reducing partial volume effects in low resolution imaging. Magnitude subtraction works better in high resolution, low contrast concentration protocols. CONCLUSION: Choosing the appropriate subtraction method according to the protocol is helpful in optimizing image quality.     

Abdominal vessel enhancement with an ultrasmall, superparamagnetic iron oxide blood pool agent: evaluation of dose and echo time dependence at different field strengths

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to determine the dose and echo time dependence of abdominal vessel enhancement at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after injection of a blood pool contrast agent at two field strengths. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers received NC100150 Injection at three dose levels (1.0 mg, 2.5 mg, and 4.0 mg of iron per kilogram of body weight). Images of the aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC) were obtained at 0.5 or 1.5 T. Four sequences with varying echo times were used with each subject. Signal intensities were recorded from the aorta, IVC, vessel vicinity, air, and a marker outside the patient. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated for the vessels. Aortic delineation was subjectively evaluated. RESULTS: Images with the highest mean vessel signal intensities, subjectively assessed as satisfactory for aortic delineation, were obtained with 2.5-4.0 mg of iron per kilogram of body weight at both field strengths. The highest CNR was found with 4.0 mg of iron per kilogram of body weight at 1.5 T. An increase in echo time caused larger signal intensity loss at larger dose levels. The signal intensity from the IVC was higher than that of the aorta at all dose levels, echo times, and field strengths. CONCLUSION: NC100150 Injection is an efficient T1-reducing agent at both 0.5 and 1.5 T. A positive dose response for CNR of the aorta and IVC was seen at 1.5 T.     

Gadolinium-enhanced, vessel-tracking, two-dimensional coronary MR angiography: single-dose arterial-phase vs. delayed-phase imaging

The purposes of our study were to investigate the benefits of using a single dose of an extracellular contrast agent for coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) and to determine the relative benefits of arterial-phase vs. delayed-phase image acquisition. The right coronary artery was imaged in 10 healthy adults using a breath-hold, two-dimensional fast gradient echo pulse sequence designed for vessel tracking (multiphase, multislice image acquisition). Pre- and postcontrast CMRA was performed. Postcontrast imaging consisted of arterial- and delayed-phase CMRA following a 15 mL bolus (single dose) of contrast media and of delayed-phase imaging following a cumulative 45 mL contrast dose (triple dose). Contrast-enhanced CMRA provided a significantly higher (P < 0.001) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) than noncontrast CMRA. CNR was highest for single-dose arterial-phase CMRA (13.1 +/- 4.5) and triple-dose delayed-phase CMRA (13.0 +/- 4.8), followed by single-dose delayed-phase CMRA (8.4 +/- 3.5) and noncontrast CMRA (4.2 +/- 1.8). Single-dose arterial-phase CMRA provided the best visualization of the distal right coronary artery and was preferred for blinded physician assessments. We concluded that utilization of a single dose of extracellular contrast media improves CMRA, especially if timed for arterial-phase imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:682-689.     

Proton two-dimensional chemical shift imaging for evaluation of prostate cancer: external surface coil vs. endorectal surface coil

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic ability of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) using an external surface coil with that using an endorectal surface coil in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging (MRI) and two-dimensional chemical shift imaging (2D CSI) were performed in 5 healthy volunteers and in 35 patients with prostate cancer. The receiver coil was the anterior lower part of a phased-array coil or an endorectal surface coil. RESULTS: Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnosing prostate cancer showed no significant difference (P = 0.784) between the area under the curve of phased-array coil CSI and that of endorectal surface coil CSI. CONCLUSION: The phased-array coil CSI could provide comparable detection accuracy to endorectal surface coil CSI. In patients with rectal diseases or patients who could not tolerate the discomfort with insertion of an endorectal surface coil, we recommend the phased-array coil CSI.     

Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with an elliptical centric view for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of high spatial resolution, selective arterial phase, 3D contrast-enhanced (CE) MR angiography with first pass bolus, software-trigger, elliptical centric view ordering in the detection of intracranial aneurysms. Our study included nine consecutive patients with ten intracranial aneurysms. 3D TOF MR angiography and 3D CE MR angiography were carried out with a 1.5-T MR scanner. 3D CE MR angiography was performed with an automated bolus detection algorithm and elliptical centric view order using ultrafast SPGR with a spatial resolution of 0.63×0.83×0.5 mm and imaging time of 55 s. Observers detected seven of ten aneurysms on 3D TOF MR angiograms and nine of ten aneurysms on 3D CE MR angiograms. 3D CE MR angiography clearly revealed an IC-PC aneurysm with a relatively smaller neck, a broad-based small aneurysm originating from tortuous and dilated MCA bifurcation, and a residual aneurysm and parent vessels adjacent to metallic aneurysmal clips, which had relatively low signal intensities on 3D TOF MR angiograms. 3D CE MR angiography was found to be a good and promising technique for detecting intracranial aneurysms with small necks and slow flow, vasculature with aneurysmal clips and tortuous vasculature with disturbed flow.     

Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral arteries: current status

Comprehensive imaging of the peripheral vasculature has traditionally only been possible with catheter angiography. With the introduction of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF MRA), non-invasive imaging of the peripheral arteries became a clinical reality; however, widespread adoption of TOF MRA did not occur due to long scan times and artefacts which precluded its use as a screening tool. Contrast-enhanced MRA, an extremely time-efficient technique with minimal associated artefacts, addresses most of the limitations of non-contrast techniques. Numerous technological advances, including bolus detection, optimized 3D volume placement, improved k-space filling mechanisms and the evolution from single-station to multi-location moving-table contrast-enhanced MRA, have facilitated the development of non-invasive evaluation of the peripheral vascular tree with contrast-enhanced techniques. Electronic Publication     

Optimization of spatial resolution for peripheral magnetic resonance angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine optimum spatial resolution when imaging peripheral arteries with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight vessel diameters ranging from 1.0 to 8.0 mm were simulated in a vascular phantom. A total of 40 three-dimensional flash MRA sequences were acquired with incremental variations of fields of view, matrix size, and slice thickness. The accurately known eight diameters were combined pairwise to generate 22 "exact" degrees of stenosis ranging from 42% to 87%. Then, the diameters were measured in the MRA images by three independent observers and with quantitative angiography (QA) software and used to compute the degrees of stenosis corresponding to the 22 "exact" ones. The accuracy and reproducibility of vessel diameter measurements and stenosis calculations were assessed for vessel size ranging from 6 to 8 mm (iliac artery), 4 to 5 mm (femoro-popliteal arteries), and 1 to 3 mm (infrapopliteal arteries). Maximum pixel dimension and slice thickness to obtain a mean error in stenosis evaluation of less than 10% were determined by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean errors on stenosis quantification were 8.8% +/- 6.3% for 6- to 8-mm vessels, 15.5% +/- 8.2% for 4- to 5-mm vessels, and 18.9% +/- 7.5% for 1- to 3-mm vessels. Mean errors on stenosis calculation were 12.3% +/- 8.2% for observers and 11.4% +/- 15.1% for QA software (P = .0342). To evaluate stenosis with a mean error of less than 10%, maximum pixel surface, the pixel size in the phase direction, and the slice thickness should be less than 1.56 mm2, 1.34 mm, 1.70 mm, respectively (voxel size 2.65 mm3) for 6- to 8-mm vessels; 1.31 mm2, 1.10 mm, 1.34 mm (voxel size 1.76 mm3), for 4- to 5-mm vessels; and 1.17 mm2, 0.90 mm, 0.9 mm (voxel size 1.05 mm3) for 1- to 3-mm vessels. CONCLUSION: Higher spatial resolution than currently used should be selected for imaging peripheral vessels.     

How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?

Our purpose was to assess the reproducibility of and differences between the most commonly used methods for assessing carotid artery stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). We studied 55 patients who underwent axial three-dimensional time-of-flight MRA (1.5 T). Quantitative caliper measurements were performed from maximum intensity projection (MIP) and multiple planar reconstruction (MPR) images, according to the criteria of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). The measurements were compared to each other and to visual interpretation, using conventional angiography as the reference. The measured percentage stenoses were higher on MRA than on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) using both NASCET (mean difference 1.9–3.0%) and ECST (6.3–6.7%) criteria. The kappa coefficients for the agreement between DSA and MRA were higher using the NAS-CET (0.61–0.76) than the ECST criteria (0.52–0.65). No statistically significant differences were found between measurements from MIP and MPR images. The ECST measurement criteria gave significantly higher percentage stenoses than the NASCET criteria (P<0.001), this difference being more prominent on MRA (mean difference in diameter stenosis percentage 14.3–16.4%) than on DSA (7.6–11.2%) and most important with mild stenoses. The difference between visual interpretation and quantitative measurements on MRA was significant (P=0.01–0.001). There were no statistically significant interobserver differences in the MRA film readings, either in visually estimated degrees of stenosis or stenosis measurements. Thus, the different criteria of the two multicentre trials led to significantly different results, especially in the assessment of mild stenosis, and these differences are more important with MRA than with aging modalities or the reconstruction programs seem less important.     

Magnetic resonance angiography of supratentorial tumours: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography

We compared magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) in the study of brain tumours and assessed the utility of gadolinium-enhanced MRA. We studied 17 patients with supratentorial brain tumors. The entire brain was imaged with multiple overlapping thin volume acquisitions. After IV injection of gadolinium-DTPA, a single thick-slab MRA acquisition was performed. Standard three-dimensional (3D-TOF) acquisitions (in six patients) and 3D-TOF with magnetization transfer prepulse and tilted optimisation nonsaturing radiofrequency excitation pulses (in 11 patients) were used. Displacement of the anterior cerebral artery, main stem and insular branches of the middle cerebral artery was seen well on unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRA. Displacement of the lenticulostriate and anterior choroidal arteries was seen only once, after Gadolinium. Tumour encasement of the middle cerebral artery was demonstrated in one patient. Tumour vessels were seen in 2 of 8 cases before and 3 of 8 after gadolinium; Tumour hypervascularity was seen only after gadolinium, in 3 of 8 cases. Study of the veins was possible only on gadolinium-enhanced MRA. Displacement of the venous angle was seen in 4 of 7 patients in the frontal, and in all of 8 patients on the lateral projections. Early venous drainage was not seen. Patency of the dural venous sinuses was demonstrated in all patients, but in one neoplastic occlusion of a cortical vein was recognised.     

Contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography using time-resolved vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction

PURPOSE: To investigate the application of time-resolved vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction (VIPR) in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the distal extremity (single station), and peripheral run-off vasculature in the abdomen, thigh, and calf (three stations). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Time-resolved distal extremity imaging was performed using VIPR sequence through the comparison of two acquisition matrix sizes: 256 with TR/TE=3.7/1.4 msec and 320 with TR/TE=4.5/1.8 msec under the same scan time of two minutes. VIPR acquisition was combined with a bolus-chase technique to image the peripheral run-off vasculature. The time-resolved images were reconstructed using a revised sliding window reconstruction filter whose temporal aperture remained narrow for low spatial frequencies and increased quadratically to include all the projection data for high spatial frequencies. RESULTS: The new temporal filter significantly suppressed the undersampling streak artifacts and venous contamination, while maintaining a high temporal resolution. Both high spatial resolution (ranging from 1.56 x 1.56 x 1.56 mm to 1.25 x 1.25 x 1.25 mm) and high temporal resolution (three seconds per frame) distal extremity images and peripheral run-off images were generated using time-resolved VIPR acquisition, which provides isotropic spatial resolution and isotropic coverage. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved VIPR acquisition was demonstrated to be well suited for distal extremity imaging by providing isotropic spatial resolution, isotropic coverage, and high temporal resolution. The combination of time-resolved VIPR and bolus chase technique provided a novel approach for peripheral run-off examinations.