Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus among Saudi patients with chronic liver diseases.

The prevalence of antibodies against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was determined in 55 patients with chronic liver diseases including liver cirrhosis (42 patients), liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (8 patients), and chronic active hepatitis (4 patients). A total of 63.6% of these patients were positive for anti-HCV, a significantly higher prevalence than the rate of 3.9% observed in 488 asymptomatic volunteers. Of the 42 patients with liver cirrhosis 16 (38.1%) had positive anti-HCV without any markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV), while 12 (28.6%) had markers of neither HCV nor HBV infection. Our findings suggest that HCV infection may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of chronic liver disease in Saudi Arabia, which is an area of endemic HBV infection. Screening for anti HCV should be considered mandatory in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) especially where the etiology appears obscure.     

HCV HBV感染与肝细胞性肝癌

调查了肝癌高发地区不同肝病患者中丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染率。慢性肝病患者绝大多数已被乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染。HCV第二代抗体阳性率,肝癌7.3％,肝硬化6.6％,慢性肝炎6.6％和急性肝炎3.4％。两种病毒的复合感染率,肝癌5.1％,肝硬化1.7％,慢性肝炎3.9％和急性肝炎1.1％。在38例HCV抗体阳性的慢性肝病患者中,ALT异常84.2％,有输血史者占57.9％,HCV-RNA阳性率为71.1％。本研究的资料分析提示,在肝癌高发地区尽管HCV抗体阳性率较低,但HCV感染也是肝癌发生的重要病因之一。     

Prevalence of hepatitis C virus antibodies in chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma patients in India

The prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) was investigated in 129 patients with chronic liver disease (85 with chronic active hepatitis and 44 with cirrhosis) and 53 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. The commercially available second generation anti-HCV enzyme immunoassay kit was used. Antibodies to hepatitis C virus were detected in 16.2% of the patients with chronic liver disease and in 15.1% with hepatocellular carcinoma. Of the HCV positive patients in all groups 51.7% were positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers indicating present or past infection. Prevalence of HBV markers in all the three groups (CAH, cirrhosis and HCC) was higher as compared with anti-HCV prevalence. These results suggest that HCV infection may not be a major cause of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma in India and indicate the presence of other aetiological agents.     

Hepatitis C in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) among patients undergoing liver transplantation and the relation between anti-HCV and post-transplant hepatitis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PATIENTS: Serum samples from 128 patients who underwent liver transplantation. Sixty-six patients who had 6 months of follow-up and for whom both pretransplant and post-transplant serum samples were available were included in a study to asses the relation between anti-HCV and post-transplant hepatitis. MEASUREMENTS: Sera were tested for anti-HCV using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and, if positive, two confirmatory tests were done. Patients had a biopsy every week until two specimens showed no abnormal findings. MAIN RESULTS: Only patients with chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis (15 of 30; 50%), alcoholic cirrhosis (7 of 19; 37%), and chronic hepatitis B infection (3 of 11; 27%) were anti-HCV positive. No patient with another form of chronic liver disease or with acute liver failure due to non-A, non-B hepatitis was anti-HCV positive. After transplantation, loss of anti-HCV was frequent and acquisition rare. Hepatitis developed in the graft in 17% of patients, but the incidence was similar among anti-HCV negative and anti-HCV-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis C virus is a common cause of chronic liver disease in patients requiring liver transplantation, but anti-HCV is rarely found in patients with acute liver failure. Previous HCV infection, based on detection of anti-HCV, is not an independent risk factor for post-transplant hepatitis.     

Hepatitis C virus infection in patients with nonalcoholic chronic liver disease

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and meaning of antibodies to the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients with nonalcoholic chronic liver diseases. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: The liver unit of a referral-based university hospital. PATIENTS: Three hundred and forty-six consecutive patients, including 137 with cryptogenic chronic liver disease, 156 with chronic hepatitis B, 47 with primary biliary cirrhosis, and 8 with persistently abnormal aminotransferase serum levels and normal liver histology. Among patients with cryptogenic liver disease, 41 received blood transfusions before discovery of liver disease and 18 had circulating nonorgan-specific autoantibodies. For comparison, 1495 apparently healthy volunteer blood donors were included in the study. LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS: The presence of anti-HCV antibodies (anti-HCV) was determined by a recently developed enzyme-linked immunoassay. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In patients with cryptogenic liver disease, the prevalence of anti-HCV was 82% (95% CI, 76% to 89%), being higher (P = 0.02) in patients with histories of blood transfusion than in those with unknown sources of exposure. Antibodies to HCV were not detected in patients with antinuclear antibodies at high titer. Among patients with chronic hepatitis B, anti-HCV were found in 11% (CI, 5% to 18%) of those with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated DNA in serum and in 29% (CI, 17% to 43%) of those with undetectable HBV replication (P less than 0.05). The prevalence of anti-HCV in blood donors was 1.2% (CI, 1.1% to 1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that HCV infection probably plays an important etiologic role in cryptogenic liver disease and, in some patients, in chronic hepatitis B. Determining whether anti-HCV are present appears to be useful for differentiating viral from autoimmune chronic liver diseases.     

The prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in patients with acute and chronic liver diseases in Jakarta, Indonesia

The seroepidemiology of HBV and HCV infections in the patients with acute and chronic liver diseases in Jakarta was investigated. The sera from 141 cases with acute hepatitis, 176 liver cirrhosis and 70 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were exmained. Anti-HA IgM, HBsAg, antiHBc IgM and anti HCV (Ortho) were detected by Elisa method. In acute hepatitis, 83 cases (58.9%) out of 141 cases were hepatitis A and 9 cases (6.4%) hepatitis B. The others were diagnosed non-A, non-B (NANB) hepatitis and anti-HCV in 4 cases (11.8%) out of 34 cases with NANB hepatitis was positive. The low prevalence of antiHCV in acute NANB hepatitis seems to be due to inadequate date of serum sampling. HBsAg and anti-HCV in liver cirrhosis were positive 36.5% and 73.9% respectively, including 22.7% of double infection. HBsAg and anti-HCV in HCC were 58.6% and 34.2%, including 17.1% of double infection. In 16.7% fo chronic liver disease (liver cirrhosis and HCC), neither HBsAg nor anti-HCV were detected.     

Prevalence of hepatitis C antibody in patients with chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea

Summary. To investigate the contribution of hepatitis C virus (HCV) to chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea, antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV) were tested by enzyme immunoassay in 1759 patients with chronic liver disease and HCC, and in 808 healthy adults. The prevalence of anti-HCV was 1.6% in 808 controls. Anti-HCV was present in 32 (7.7%) of 418 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive and 128 (53.1%) of 241 HBsAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis, 16 (6.0%) of 265 HBsAg-positive and 90 (30.5%) of 295 HBsAg-negative patients with liver cirrhosis, and 16 (4.8%) of 330 HBsAg-positive and 61 (29.0%) of 210 HBsAg-negative patients with HCC. Antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) were present in 80–88% of patients who were seropositive for anti-HCV and seronegative for HBsAg. Among the sera from 114 patients with HBsAg-negative and anti-HCV-positive chronic liver diseases, HBV DNA and HCV RNA were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 54 (47.4%) and 61 (53.3%), respectively. Both HBV DNA and HCV RNA were detected in 4 (4.4%) samples. The mean age of the patients with both HBsAg and anti-HCV was not different from that of patients who were seropositive for HBsAg alone. These findings indicate that current and/or past HBV infection is still the main cause of chronic liver disease in Korea. Although multivariate analysis showed that anti-HCV is a risk factor for chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis of the liver and HCC, PCR data for HBV DNA and HCV RNA indicate that HCV infection plays only a minor role in HBsAg-positive as well as in HBsAg-negative liver disease and does not accelerate the development of HCC in HBV carriers.     

Hepatitis C virus infection in chronic liver disease in Bombay.

To find out the prevalence of antibody of hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in patients with chronic liver disease in Bombay, sera from 126 patients (93 men, 33 women; aged 9-70 years, mean 39.7) with chronic liver disease (cirrhosis 103, cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma 3, chronic active hepatitis 20) were tested for HBsAg and anti-HCV antibody. HBsAg positive sera were tested for anti-delta antibody and IgM anti-HBc. All the tests were carried out by ELISA. Of 126 patients, 51 (40.5%) were HBsAg positive, 49 (38.8%) alcoholic and 21 (16.6%) anti-HCV positive. The prevalence of anti-HCV in HBsAg positive, alcoholic and cryptogenic (HBV negative and no alcohol) liver disease patients was 13.7%, 14.7% and 20.5% respectively. Of 21 anti-HCV antibody positive patients, 8 (38%) had received blood transfusions previously. HCV is present in 15-20% of patients with chronic liver disease in Bombay.     

Profile of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: Although chronic hepatitis B occurs in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients, its prevalence and clinical significance are not known. AIM: To determine the prevalence and profile of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 363 consecutive patients (mean age 36 y; 288 men) with chronic HBV infection was performed. All patients were HBsAg-positive. Tests for liver profile, HBeAg and anti-HBe antibody were performed in all patients. Serum HBV DNA was tested using branched DNA assay in 245 patients. The patients were classified into three groups: no cirrhosis with normal ALT levels, no cirrhosis with elevated ALT levels, and clinical or histological evidence of cirrhosis. RESULTS: Of 363 patients, 141 (39%) were HBeAg-positive and 222 (61%) HBeAg-negative. Of HBeAg-negative patients, 120 (54%) had normal ALT, 45 (20%) had elevated ALT and 57 (26%) had evidence of cirrhosis; corresponding figures in the HBeAg-positive patients were 40 (28%), 66 (47%) and 35 (25%). HBV DNA was positive in 53 of 131 (40%) HBeAg-negative patients tested; of these 53 patients, 9 (17%) had normal ALT, 20 (38%) had elevated ALT and 24 (45%) had cirrhosis. Thus, 72% of HBeAg-positive and 46% of HBeAg-negative patients had elevated ALT and/or cirrhosis. Among the latter group, 83% of HBV DNA-positive patients had elevated ALT and/or cirrhosis. Overall, 18% of HBsAg-positive patients had HBeAg-negative, HBV DNA-positive liver disease. CONCLUSION: HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B is not an uncommon and benign entity and chronic liver disease develops in a significant proportion of such patients.     

Liver damage in Italian patients with hereditary hemochromatosis is highly influenced by hepatitis B and C virus infection

We evaluated the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in 78 Italian patients with hereditary hemochromatosis as well as the relation between HCV antibody (anti-HCV) status, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and liver histology. None of the patients had been transfused or ever consumed more than 60 g of alcohol per day. Eighteen showed histological signs of chronic hepatitis, active cirrhosis was present in 12, chronic active hepatitis in 4 and chronic persistent hepatitis in 2. Liver fibrosis or cirrhosis without inflammatory activity was observed in 31 subjects, whereas liver histology was normal except for iron overload in 18. The prevalence of HBsAg in the whole series was 5% and of anti-HCV was 20.5%. The prevalence of HBsAg and anti-HCV was significantly higher in the chronic hepatitis group than in the fibrosis/cirrhosis (p = 0.01) and the normal groups (p < 0.01). Fourteen of 18 hereditary hemochromatosis patients with chronic hepatitis were HBsAg (4) or anti-HCV (10) positive and all the latter subgroup had HCV-RNA in their serum as shown by the polymerase chain reaction. Although most of the patients with associated chronic hepatitis had cirrhosis, their serum ferritin levels and amount of mobilizable iron were significantly lower than those of the fibrosis/cirrhosis group (p < 0.01). This indicates that hepatitis viral infection acts synergistically with iron in accelerating the development of liver damage.     

Detection of serum antibody against hepatitis C virus in patients with hepatitis and liver diseases]

Antibody against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was tested in 658 cases of hepatitis and liver diseases with ELISA, ninety of these cases were positive, with a total infection rate of 13.68% (90/658). The positive rate of anti-HCV was highest in patients with chronic severe hepatitis (33.78%) and CAH accompanied by cirrhosis of liver(31.58%). The infection rate in other types of hepatic diseases in order of frequency was as follows: fulminant hepatitis (18.18%), CAH without cirrhosis (15.13%), subacute severe hepatitis (13.43%), CPH (5.88%), primary hepatocellular carcinoma (3.85%), and acute hepatitis (2.42%). Serological markers of HBV infection were detectable concomitantly in 77 of the 90 cases who were anti-HCV positive, but there was no evidence of mutual inhibition of viral replication. There was neither appreciable difference in the level of hyperbilirubinemia in cases of hepatitis with or without anti-HCV, nor significant diversity in the number of death between cases of severe hepatitis with and without anti-HCV.     

Relationship between levels of DNA damage in lymphocytes and histopathological severity of chronic hepatitis C and various clinical forms of hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A significant proportion of cancer is attributable to DNA damage caused by chronic infection and inflammation. Because both hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV, respectively) cause chronic infection and inflammatory disease, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether there is a difference in peripheral DNA damage in patients with chronic HCV compared with patients with chronic HBV; and whether there is an association in the level of peripheral DNA damage with a natural history of HBV infection. METHODS: Twenty patients with chronic hepatitis C, 20 patients with chronic hepatitis B, 11 patients with cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis B, 12 inactive hepatitis B s antigen (HBsAg) carriers and 21 healthy subjects were included in the study. The DNA damage in lymphocytes was determined using the alkaline comet assay. RESULTS: Although the chronic hepatitis C group had similar levels of DNA damage compared with patients with cirrhosis due to hepatitis B (P > 0.05) and non-cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis B (P > 0.05), they had higher levels of DNA damage compared with inactive HBsAg carriers (P = 0.021) and controls (P = 0.001). Hepatitis B cirrhotic patients and patients with chronic hepatitis B had significantly higher levels of DNA damage than inactive HBsAg carriers (P = 0.002 and P = 0.012, respectively) and controls (both P = 0.001). Linear logistic regression analysis showed that chronic hepatitis C and HBV-related cirrhosis were discriminators in determining DNA damage in lymphocytes (beta 0.424 and P = 0.013, beta 0.393 and P = 0.016, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic hepatitis C, based on the severity of liver disease, or cirrhosis as an advanced form of HBV infection increase DNA damage in lymphocytes independently of confounding factors such as age, gender, body mass index and smoking habits.     

Prevalence and outcomes of HBV and anti-HCV seropositive patients with chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma.

The prevalences of serological markers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) were determined in 168 patients (135 males and 33 females), aged 19-79 years (mean = 50.8) in Thailand. Of these, 33 had chronic persistent hepatitis, 35 chronic active hepatitis, 50 cirrhosis and 50 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Seromarkers for either HBV or anti-HCV or both were detected in 140 (83.3%), 3 (1.8%) and 18 (10.7%) patients, respectively, but 7 (4.2%) were sero-negative for both viruses. The overall prevalence of anti-HCV was 12.5% but was significantly lower in HCC (2%) compared to the other 3 groups of liver disease (12-21.5%, p less than or equal to 0.05) and in HBsAg positive (5%) compared to HBsAg negative (30%) patients (p less than 0.001). After 0.5-9 years follow-up of all anti-HCV positive patients, 2 died and another 6 had progressive liver disease. The prevalence of coexistent HBV seromarkers was similar in patients with a progressive (87.5%) and a stable clinical course (92.3%) (p = 0.62). A higher proportion of the anti-HCV-positive patients with a progressive course had a history of blood transfusion [75.0% vs 46.1% (p = 0.20)]. These findings suggest that HBV is the most important etiologic virus associated with chronic liver disease and HCC in Thailand, but HCV may play a role particularly in HBsAg-negative patients.     

Seroprevalence of antibody against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in various groups of individuals in Korea

We studied the prevalence of anti-HCV in 585 sera from various individuals, using enzyme immunoassay (ElA, Abbott Lab.). Anti-HCV was detected in 16 (10.7%) out of the 150 patients with HBsAg positive liver diseases diagnosed by liver biopsy and they consisted of none out of 10 acute viral hepatitis, 3 out of 15 chronic persistent hepatitis, 4 out of 50 chronic active hepatitis, 2 out of 32 liver cirrhosis, and 7 out of 43 hepatocellular carcinoma. Anti-HCV was detected in 43 (45.3%) out of 95 patients with HBsAg negative liver diseases diagnosed by liver biopsy and they consisted of 5 out of 8 acute viral hepatitis, 2 out of 10 chronic persistent hepatitis, 17 out of 30 chronic active hepatitis, 4 out of 15 liver cirrhosis, and 15 out of 32 hepatocellular carcinoma. Anti-HCV was detected in 22 (38.6%) out of 57 hemodialysis patients, in 3 (6.7%) out of 45 kidney transplants, in 2 (11.1%) out of 18 fatty liver diagnosed by liver biopsy, in 2 (1.3%) out of 150 healthy blood donors, in none out of 40 healthy volunteers, in 6 (31.6%) out of 19 rheumatoid arthritis and in 6 (54.5%) out of 11 systemic lupus erythematosis cases. There were familial clusters of chronic liver diseases in 4.7% of patients with HBsAg negative/anti-HCV positive chronic liver diseases, while in 19.4% of patients with HBsAg positive/anti-HCV negative liver diseases. Incidence of anti-HCV within patients with HBsAg positive liver diseases was higher in HBsAg negative patients than in HBsAg positive patients (17.6% and 10.3%, respectively). In hemodialysis patients, the number of hemodialysis procedures was significantly higher in anti-HCV positive patients than in anti-HCV negative patients (P<0.009), but the amount of blood transfusion showed no difference between anti-HCV positive and negative patients. We concluded that HCV might be an important cause of various types of HBsAg negative liver diseases in Korea, and intrafamilial transmission of HCV might be less common than of hepatitis B virus (HBV), and long duration of hemodialysis might be related to the increment of incidence of anti-HCV in hemodialysis units, and the high frequency of false positive anti-HCV in autoimmune disorders without evidence of any liver diseases might limit the use of the current anti-HCV tests.     

Expression of hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers in chronic liver disease positive for antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV)

We investigated expression of HBV markers in chronic liver disease positive for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV). Sera from 107 patients with chronic non-A, non-B liver disease, 65 HBs antigen carriers with chronic liver disease and 14 asymptomatic HBV carriers were tested for the presence of anti-HCV. Anti-HCV was detected in 83 (78%) patients with chronic non-A, non-B liver disease, irrespective of the past history of blood transfusion, and anti-HCV prevalence was similar in each category of chronic liver disease. Fifty-three (64%) out of these 83 sera positive for anti-HCV has also antibodies to HBV. Anti-HBc antibody was detected frequently in liver cirrhotics with hepatocellular carcinoma than in chronic persistent hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis and cirrhotics without hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, titers of anti-HBc antibody were significantly higher in cirrhotics with hepatocellular carcinoma than in the other groups. On the other hand, anti-HCV was detected in 7 out of 65 patients with HBV-related liver disease. Four out of these 7 were patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Anti-HCV was detected in none of asymptomatic HBV carriers. These findings suggest that infection with both HBV and HCV is likely to cause more serious liver disease than infection with a single agent.     

Infrequent occurrence of silent HBV infection among Indian patients with chronic liver disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of silent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection among patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). METHODS: Plasma samples from 71 CLD patients including 9 HBsAg-positive individuals were tested for HBV DNA by nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), and for HBV serum markers, i.e., anti-HBc antibody, HBeAg and anti-HBe antibody. The individuals were also tested for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and anti-HCV antibody. RESULTS: Among 62 HBsAg-negative patients, silent HBV infection was seen in only two (3.2%). Silent HBV infection was not found in any of the 26 patients who had evidence of HCV infection. One HBsAg-positive patient was positive for anti-HCV in the absence of HCV RNA. CONCLUSIONS: There is a low rate of silent HBV infection among patients with CLD in India, where HBV is moderately endemic. Silent HBV infection is not associated with HCV-related CLD, which is in contrast to reports from other HBV-endemic areas in Asia.     

肝病与乙型、丙型肝炎病毒感染关系的探讨

本文采用ELISA法对25例慢性肝炎，105例肝硬化，64例肝癌，以及8例急性黄疸型肝炎进行了HBV标志物及抗－HCV的检测，结果：HBV感染率为80．6％，抗－HCV检测阳性率为46％，二者均阳性的双重感染率为32％。其中肝癌组双重感染明显高于肝硬化组，P＜0．001。单纯抗-HCV检出率为10．8％，说明HBV是引起肝炎，肝硬化，肝癌的主要原因，而CV感染也是其致病因素。本文对有输血史的慢性肝炎，肝硬化，肝癌100例进行抗－HCV检测其阳性率为59％，而02例无输血史的肝病患者抗－HCV检出率为25％，输血组抗－HCV检出率明显高于无输血组，P＜0．001。其中慢性肝炎，肝硬化，肝癌病人输血组抗－HCV检出率亦明显高于无输血组，各组P＜0．001，故提示，HCV感染与输血有密切关系。50例HBV标志物阴性的健康献血员抗－HCV阳性率为6％。     

Hepatitis B and C virus infection as risk factors for liver cirrhosis and cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study

To investigate whether hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are risk factors for liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a case-control study of 102 cirrhotic HCC patients, 102 sex-matched and age-matched patients with liver cirrhosis, and 102 matched patients with non-hepatic disease controls was performed. The prevalences of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) in HCC (70.5%, 39.2%) and liver cirrhosis (74.5%, 27.4%) were higher than controls (16.6%, 10.5%) (P = 0.0001). In HBsAg-negative patients, the prevalence of anti-HCV in cirrhotic HCC (66.6%) and liver cirrhosis (46.1%) was higher than in controls (10.5%; P = 0.0001). There was no such difference in HBsAg-positive patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that both HBsAg and anti-HCV were important risk factors for HCC (odds ratio, 6.52 and 4.59, respectively) and liver cirrhosis (odds ratio, 4.22 and 2.29, respectively). There was no difference in odds ratio when HCC and liver cirrhosis were compared. Our result implies that both HBV and HCV are independent risk factors for cirrhotic HCC and liver cirrhosis in Taiwan.     

Clinical features of HBsAg-negative but anti-HBc-positive hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B virus endemic area

BACKGROUND: The presence of antibody to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) IgG in serum usually means a past infection of the hepatitis B virus (HBV). The clinical characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who have only a marker for past HBV infection, were investigated. METHODS: A total of 565 HCC patients were classified according to their markers for HBV and the hepatitis C virus (HCV). The clinical features and the survival rate of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)(-)/anti-HBc(+) patients were compared to those of HBsAg(+) patients. RESULTS: Four hundred and three patients were positive for HBsAg (B group, 71.3%), 64 were positive for anti-HCV (11.3%), and 90 were negative for both HBsAg and anti-HCV (N group, 15.9%). In the N group, 71 were positive for anti-HBc (PB group, 12.6% of total patients). The clinical characteristics of the PB group were different from those of the B group: age at diagnosis (60.6 +/- 9.6 vs 53.3 +/- 10.6 years, P < 0.001), habitual drinking (59.2% vs 23.6%, P < 0.001), family history of liver disease (9.9% vs 38.9%, P < 0.005), detection with periodic screening (28.2% vs 50.4%, P < 0.001), and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (53.5% vs 76.2%, P < 0.001). In both the PB group and the B group, liver cirrhosis was accompanied by a similar high prevalence (74.6% vs 89.1%). However, there was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(+) HCC is not rare or more common than that of anti-HCV(+) HCC in Korea, a high HBV endemic area. Although some differences in clinical characteristics may imply a different pathogenesis, chronic HBV infection or habitual drinking may be major contributing factors in the development of HCC in these patients.