Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted colectomy and rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Lately, the main technical innovations in the field of colorectal surgery have been the introduction of laparoscopic and robotic techniques; the aim of this study is to investigate the results and the advantages of these two surgical approaches.

Methods

Twenty-two studies including 1652 laparoscopic and 1120 robotic-assisted resections were analyzed and categorized into right, left, and pelvic resections of the middle/low rectum, aiming to the following outcomes: operating time, blood loss, bowel function recovery, return to oral intake, morbidity, hospital stay, and costs.

Results

The vast majority of the studies were non-randomized investigations (19/22 studies) enrolling small cohorts of patients (median 55.0 laparoscopic and 34.5 robotic-assisted group) with a mean age of 62.2–61.0 years. Funnel plot analysis documented heterogeneity in studies which combined cancers and benign diseases.Our meta-analysis demonstrated a significant difference in favor of laparoscopic procedures regarding costs and operating time (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.686 and 0.493) and in favor of robotic surgery concerning morbidity rate (odds ratio (OR) 0.763), although no benefits were documented when analyzing exclusively randomized trials. When we differentiated approaches by side of resections, a significant difference was found in favor of the laparoscopic group when analyzing operating time in left-sided and pelvic procedures (SMD 0.609 and 0.529) and blood loss in pelvic resections (SMD 0.339).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic techniques were documented as the shorter procedures, which provided lower blood loss in pelvic resections, while morbidity rate was more favorable in robotic surgery. However, these results could not be confirmed when we focused the analysis on randomized trials only.

     

Laparoscopy reduces iatrogenic splenic injuries during colorectal surgery

Background

Splenic injury can occur during colorectal surgery especially in cases, where the splenic flexure is mobilized. The aim of this study was to analyze whether the operative approach (laparoscopic vs. open) was associated with an increased risk for splenic injury during colorectal surgery and to compare the outcomes of different management options.

Methods

All accidental injuries that occurred during colorectal resections performed in our department between January 2010 and June 2013 were identified from an administrative database. All patients with iatrogenic splenic injuries were classified into two groups according to the operative approach. Only procedures that required splenic flexure mobilization were included. Splenic injury management options and outcomes were compared.

Results

There were 2336 colorectal resections (1520 open, 816 laparoscopic) performed during the study period. There were 25 (1.1%) iatrogenic splenic injuries. 23 out of 25 splenic injuries occurred during open colorectal surgery. Overall, 16 (64%) patients were managed with topical hemostatic methods, 5 (20%) with splenectomy, and 4 (16%) with splenorrhaphy. It was possible to salvage the spleen in both laparoscopic patients. The laparoscopic approach was associated with a lower splenic injury rate (0.25% vs. 1.5%, p?=?0.005) and a lower need for splenectomy/splenorrhaphy (p?=?0.03).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that laparoscopic colorectal surgery may be associated with a lower risk of iatrogenic splenic injury, and that most splenic injuries can be managed with spleen-preserving approaches.

     

Differences in surgical site infection between laparoscopic colon and rectal surgeries: sub-analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (Japan-Multinational Trial Organization PREV 07-01)

Background

The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) is reportedly lower in laparoscopic colorectal surgery than in open surgery, but data on the difference in SSI incidence between colon and rectal laparoscopic surgeries are limited.

Methods

The incidence and risk factors for SSI, and the effect of oral antibiotics in colon and rectal laparoscopic surgeries, were investigated as a sub-analysis of the JMTO-PREV-07-01 (a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of oral/parenteral vs. parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery).

Results

A total of 582 elective laparoscopic colorectal resections, comprising 376 colon surgeries and 206 rectal surgeries, were registered. The incidence of SSI in rectal surgery was significantly higher than in colon surgery (14 vs. 8.2 %, P = 0.041). Although the incidence of incisional SSI was almost identical (7 %) between the surgeries, the incidence of organ/space SSI in rectal surgery was significantly higher than in colon surgery (6.3 vs. 1.1 %, P = 0.0006). The lack of oral antibiotics was significantly associated with the development of SSI in colon surgery. Male sex, stage IV cancer, and abdominoperineal resection were significantly associated with SSI in rectal surgery. The combination of oral and parenteral antibiotics significantly reduced the overall incidence of SSI in colon surgery (relative risk 0.41, 95 % confidence interval 0.19–0.86).

Conclusion

The incidence of SSI in laparoscopic rectal surgery was higher than in colon surgery because of the higher incidence of organ/space SSI in rectal surgery. The risk factors for SSIs and the effect of oral antibiotics differed between these two procedures.

     

Robotic transanal surgery (RTAS) with utilization of a next-generation single-port system: a cadaveric feasibility study

Purpose

Transanal surgery remains both an innovative approach to rectal pathology and a demonstrated technical challenge. Improved technology using a single-port system robotic platform (SPS) offers a promising option for this surgery.

Methods

SPS robotic system was utilized to perform submucosal, full-thickness and cylindrical excision on four cadavers. Operative performance and surgeon fatigue were measured.

Results

On all types of resections, the SPS system performed well. There were no piecemeal or fragmented resections. Closure was judged to be good to excellent in all cases. Surgeon assessment of setup and performance of the SPS was excellent in all cases.

Conclusions

SPS robotic transanal surgery represents an exciting new option for transanal surgery.

     

Pancreatic Leaks and Fistulae: An Endoscopy-Oriented Classification

Background

Pancreatic leaks occur as a complication of upper gastrointestinal surgery, acute pancreatitis, or abdominal trauma. Pancreatic fistulas and leaks are primarily managed conservatively. Overall, conservative measures are successful in more than half of cases. Whenever conservative treatment is not efficient, surgery is usually considered the treatment of choice. Nowadays however, endoscopic treatment is being increasingly considered and employed in many cases, as a surgery sparing intervention.

Aim

To introduce a classification of pancreatic fistulas according to the location of the leak and ductal anatomy and finally propose the best suited endoscopic method to treat the leak according to current literature.

Methods

We performed an extensive review of the literature on pancreatic fistulae and leaks.

Results

In this paper, we review the various types of leaks and propose a novel endoscopic classification of pancreatic fistulas in order to standardize and improve endoscopic treatment.

Conclusions

A proper and precise diagnosis should be made before embarking on endoscopic treatment for pancreatic leaks in order to obtain prime therapeutic results. A multidisciplinary team of interventional endoscopists, pancreatic surgeons, and interventional radiologists is best suited to care for these patients.

     

Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review

Introduction

Laparoscopy is widely used in colorectal practice, but recent trial results have questioned its use in rectal cancer resections. Patient outcomes are directly linked to the quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimen. Objective assessment of intraoperative performance could help ensure competence and delivery of optimal outcomes. Objective tools may also contribute to TME intervention trials, but their nature, structure and utilisation is unknown.

Aim

To systemically review the available literature to report on the available tools for the objective assessment of minimally invasive TME operative performance and their use within multicentre laparoscopic TME randomised controlled trials.

Methods

A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed to identify tools used in the objective intraoperative assessment of minimally invasive TME performance in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, independently by two authors. The identified tools were then evaluated within reported TME RCTs.

Results

A total of 8642 abstracts were screened of which 12 papers met the inclusion criteria; ten prospective observational studies, one randomised trial and one educational consensus. Eight assessment methods were described, which include formative and summative tools. The tools were mostly adaptations of colonic surgery tools based on either operative video review or post-operative trainer rating. All studies reported objective assessment of intraoperative performance was feasible, but only 126 (7%) of the 1762 included laparoscopic cases were TME. No multicentre laparoscopic TME trial reported using any objective surgical performance assessment tool.

Conclusion

Objective intraoperative laparoscopic TME performance assessment is feasible, but most of the current tools are adaptation of colonic surgery. There is a need to develop dedicated assessment tools for minimal access rectal surgery. No multicentre minimally invasive TME RCT reported using any objective assessment tool.

     

Using CRP to predict anastomotic leakage after open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is there a difference?

Aim

C-reactive protein (CRP) has proven to be a useful adjunct in early diagnosis of anastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal surgery. It would be of considerable value to examine whether modality of surgery has influence upon postoperative CRP serum levels and their predictive value in the diagnosis of AL.

Methods

All patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis were enrolled into a prospective database between 2011 and 2014. AL was defined with strict operative and radiological criteria. Outcomes between open and laparoscopic resections were assessed statistically and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis performed.

Results

Seven hundred twenty-seven patients with an intestinal anastomosis were identified including 468 laparoscopic procedures (468/727; 64 %). There were 58 anastomotic leaks (58/727; 7.9 %) of which 29 (6.2 %) were laparoscopic and 29 (11.2 %) were open.Mean CRP levels were significantly higher in patients after open surgery compared with laparoscopic both with AL (p?=?0.013), and without (p?=?0.02).ROC curve analysis revealed postoperative day 3 (cut-off CRP 209) and day 4 (cut-off CRP 123.5) to be most predictive of leak in the open group with an area under the curve (AUC) 0.794 (sensitivity 80 %, specificity 80 %) and AUC 0.806 (sensitivity 94 %, specificity 60 %), respectively. In the laparoscopic group, day 2 proved to be the most accurate day for detection of leak with a cut-off CRP of 146.5 showing 75 % sensitivity and a 70 % specificity (AUC 0.766).

Conclusion

CRP levels are higher after open surgery compared with laparoscopic surgery, both with and without AL. AL generates a significant detectable increase in CRP within 2–4 days after surgery.

     

Robotik-assistierte kolorektale Chirurgie

Background

Robotics-assisted colorectal resections are well-established and standardized procedures. The penetrance of this technique shows an exponential increase worldwide. This development will be further enhanced through the implemetation of other innovative robotics systems in the near future.

Objective

Meaningful indications, set-up, operative strategy and techniques are presented and discussed.

Methods

Presentation of our experiences with nearly 400 colorectal resections with the Da Vinci® SI system. Discussion of the available data and studies.

Results

The features of robotic assistance are particularly helpful in technically challenging situations and complex operative procedures. Robotic assistance improves outcome after these minimally invasive operations. Oncological rectal resection, right sided hemicolectomy and anterior rectopexy are reasonable and meaningful indications for the Da Vinci® SI system. The Da Vinci® XI system and the forthcoming alternative systems from other manufacurers make complete colectomy and restorative coloproctectomy ideal interventions for robotic assistance.

Conclusion

Robotics-assisted colorectal resections are well-established and standardized procedures. They improve outcome after complex procedures and will help to increase the penetrance of minimally invasive approaches in colorectal surgery. The continuous ongoing technical innovations, such as immunfluorescence, “smart” clamping (already available), navigation, in vivo microscopy, large data managment and cognitive systems (upcoming) will further change the operating theater working place. There is only one negative argument against active participation in this important development – the high costs.

     

Intraoperative colonic pulse oximetry in left-sided colorectal surgery: can it predict anastomotic leak?

Background

An anastomotic leak is a fairly common and a potentially lethal complication in colorectal surgery. Objective methods to assess the viability and blood circulation of the anastomosis could help in preventing leaks. Intraoperative pulse oximetry is a cheap, easy to use, fast, and readily available method to assess tissue viability. Our aim was to study whether intraoperative pulse oximetry can predict the development of an anastomotic leak.

Methods

The study was a prospective single-arm study conducted between the years 2005 and 2011 in Helsinki University Hospital. Patient material consisted of 422 patients undergoing elective left-sided colorectal surgery. The patients were operated by one of the three surgeons. All of the operations were partial or total resections of the left side of the colon with a colorectal anastomosis. The intraoperative colonic oxygen saturation was measured with pulse oximetry from the colonic wall, and the values were analyzed with respect to post-operative complications.

Results

2.3 times more operated anastomotic leaks occurred when the colonic StO₂ was ≤?90% (11/129 vs 11/293). The mean colonic StO₂ was 91.1 in patients who developed an operated anastomotic leak and 93.0 in patients who did not. With logistic regression analysis, the risk of operated anastomotic leak was 4.2 times higher with StO₂ values ≤?90%.

Conclusions

Low intraoperative colonic StO₂ values are associated with the occurrence of anastomotic leak. Despite its handicaps, the method seems to be useful in assessing anastomotic viability.

     

Gefahr der Anastomoseninsuffizienz nach laparoskopischer und offener kolorektaler Resektion

Background

Anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. With the widespread adoption of laparoscopy, data from initial clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of laparoscopic when compared to open surgery may not currently be generalizable. We assess the risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection using a nationwide database with standardized definitions.

Methods

The 2012–2013 ACS-NSQIP targeted colectomy data were queried for all elective colorectal resections. Characteristics were compared for those patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open operations. Univariable and multivariable analyses, followed by a propensity score-matched analysis, were performed to assess the impact of laparoscopy on the development of an anastomotic leak.

Results

Of 23,568 patients, 3.4% developed an anastomotic leak. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a leak rate of 2.8% (n = 425) and open surgery, 4.5% (n = 378, p <0.0001). Patients who developed a leak were more likely to die within 30 days of surgery (5.7 vs 0.6%, p <0.0001). Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery compared to open were younger (61 vs 63 years, p = 0, p = 0.045) and with fewer comorbidities. On univariable analysis laparoscopic surgery was associated with reduced odds of developing an anastomotic leak (OR 0.60, p <0.0001), and this remained after adjusting for all significant preoperative and disease-related confounders (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58–0.82). A propensity score-matched analysis confirmed benefit of laparoscopic surgery over open surgery for anastomotic leak.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and associated with reduced odds of developing an anastomotic leak following colectomy when controlling for patient-, disease and procedure-related factors.

     

Clinicopathological differences between right- and left-sided colonic tumors and impact upon survival

Aim

This study is to analyze the clinicopathological differences between right- and left-sided colonic tumors and to evaluate the impact upon the patient’s survival.

Methods

In a period of 5 years (2004–2009), 453 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

Results

From a total of 453 patients diagnosed with colon cancer, 56.5% of them were men, while 43.5% of them were women. Right-sided colonic tumors were diagnosed in 54.53% of the patients compared to the 45.47% of patients with left-sided colonic tumors. The size of colonic tumors is statistically significant greater in right-sided colonic tumors compared to left ones (P < 0.001). Left-sided colon cancer patients identified to have a statistically significant better overall 5-year survival rate compared to right-sided ones (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Based upon our results, there is a different biological profile between right- and left-sided colonic tumors.

     

Colorectal cancer surgery in the very elderly patient: a systematic review of laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of death from neoplastic disease in men and third in women of all ages. Globally, life expectancy is increasing, and consequently, an increasing number of operations are being performed on more elderly patients with the trend set to continue.Elderly patients are more likely to have cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities that are associated with increased peri-operative risk. They further tend to present with more locally advanced disease, more likely to obstruct or have disseminated disease.The aim of this review was to investigate the feasibility of laparoscopic colorectal resection in very elderly patients, and whether there are benefits over open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on Medline, Pubmed, Embase and Google Scholar. All comparative studies evaluating patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the patients population over 85 were included.The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day overall morbidity. Secondary outcomes were operating time, time to oral diet, number of retrieved lymph nodes, blood loss and 5-year survival.

Results

The search provided 1507 citations. Sixty-nine articles were retrieved for full text analysis, and only six retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall mortality for elective laparoscopic resection was 2.92% and morbidity 23%. No single study showed a significant difference between laparoscopic and open surgery for morbidity or mortality, but pooled data analysis demonstrated reduced morbidity in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.032). Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery are more likely to have a shorter hospital stay and a shorter time to oral diet.

Conclusion

Elective laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in the over 85 age group is feasible and safe and offers similar advantages over open surgery to those demonstrated in patients of younger ages.

     

Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for rectal cancer

Aim

Aim of this study is to present the incidence of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer and to demonstrate the therapeutic approach for the treatment of this complication.

Patients and methods

Between 1990 and 2009, 170 patients underwent low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME).

Results

A total of 14 (8.2%) anastomotic leaks were confirmed. Reoperation was carried out in six patients with major leaks. Eight patients with minor leaks were treated conservatively by nutritional support and antibiotic therapy.

Conclusion

The incidence of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum for rectal cancer is relatively low.

     

Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study

Purpose

Urological and sexual dysfunction are recognised risks of rectal cancer surgery; however, there is limited evidence regarding urogenital function comparing robotic to laparoscopic techniques. The aim of this study was to assess the urogenital functional outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgery.

Methods

Urological and sexual functions were assessed using gender-specific validated standardised questionnaires. Questionnaires were sent a minimum of 6 months after surgery, and patients were asked to report their urogenital function pre- and post-operatively, allowing changes in urogenital function to be identified. Questionnaires were sent to 158 patients (89 laparoscopy, 69 robotic) of whom 126 (80 %) responded. Seventy-eight (49 male, 29 female) of the responders underwent laparoscopic and 48 (35 male, 13 female) robotic surgery.

Results

Male patients in the robotic group deteriorated less across all components of sexual function and in five components of urological function. Composite male urological and sexual function score changes from baseline were better in the robotic cohort (p < 0.001). In females, there was no difference between the two groups in any of the components of urological or sexual function. However, composite female urological function score change from baseline was better in the robotic group (p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Robotic rectal cancer surgery might offer better post-operative urological and sexual outcomes compared to laparoscopic surgery in male patients and better urological outcomes in females. Larger scale, prospective randomised control studies including urodynamic assessment of urogenital function are required to validate these results.

     

Considerations on the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a view from the bottom

Introduction

Those who have surmounted the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resection state that considerable numbers of highly selected cases should comprise a department’s early experience to ensure reliability of technique before routine implementation. The objective of this study was to determine how this advice may interrupt case flow.

Methods

Details on all colorectal operations performed in a single institution over a 4-year period were gleaned from a prospectively maintained database. Patient profiles were scrutinised to identify how the application of various published exclusion criteria would impact upon the theoretical completion rates of our proposed learning curve.

Results

In total, 317 colorectal resections were performed; 259 operations were for adenocarcinoma (including 100 rectal tumours) while 58 were for benign disease. Of those with malignancy, 25(10%) were obese, 61(24%) had previous intra-abdominal surgery, while 52(20%) were aged over 80 years and 60(23%) were ASA ¾. Strictest exclusion criteria would halve the number of cases to be commenced laparoscopically. A specialist registrar rotating through the department would have case exposure cut from a mean of 33 to 11 in 6 months under this regimen. Prioritising benign cases in the initial experience as has been recommended by certain groups would mean that, at most, 1.2 cases would be performed every 4 weeks during the learning period.

Conclusion

Although our caseload seems sufficient to allow the acquisition of expertise in a timely fashion, procedural flow would be markedly interrupted by stringent pre-selection. A low threshold for initiating the procedure laparoscopically seems a pragmatic way of ensuring departmental confidence through familiarity.

     

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer using a cranial approach: anatomical and embryological consideration

Background

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) should be employed for the treatment of colon cancer patients because of its superior oncological outcomes. However, this technique is technically challenging in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy because of the anatomical complexity of the transverse mesocolon.

Methods

We focused on the embryology and anatomy of the transverse mesocolon to overcome the difficulty of this surgery. The validity and efficacy of a cranial approach in achieving CME with CVL in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was elucidated from the embryological point of view.

Results

In total, 28 consecutive patients with right-sided colon cancer were treated by laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using a cranial approach. There were no conversion to open surgery or switching to another approach. Using this approach, torsion and fusion of the transverse mesocolon, which occurred during embryological development, could be reversed and the complex anatomy of the transverse mesocolon could be simplified before performing CVL of colonic vessels.

Conclusions

A cranial approach is considered valid and useful for CME with CVL in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy from the embryological point of view.

     

Risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence in colon cancer surgery—a population-based registry study

Purpose

The aim of this was to assess potential risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence in colon cancer surgery in a national cohort.

Methods

All patients, who had undergone a resection of a large bowel segment with an anastomosis between 2008 and 2011, were identified in the Swedish Colon Cancer Registry. Patient factors, socioeconomic factors, surgical factors, and medication and hospital data were combined to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence.

Results

The prevalence of anastomotic dehiscence was 4.3 % (497/11 565). Male sex, ASA classification III–IV, prescribed medications, bleeding more than 300 mL, and uncommon colorectal resections were associated with a higher risk of anastomotic dehiscence. Hospital stay was increased with 14.5 days, and 30-day mortality as well as long-term mortality was higher in the anastomotic dehiscence group.

Conclusions

There are several factors that are possible to know preoperatively or during surgery that can indicate whether an anastomosis is an appropriate option. Anastomotic dehiscence increases hospital stay and long-term mortality.

     

Predictive factors for extraction site hernia after laparoscopic right colectomy

Purpose

Incisional hernia at the extraction site (ESIH) is a common complication after laparoscopic colorectal resections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and potential risk factors for ESIH in a large cohort study having standardized technique.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was performed including all patients who underwent elective laparoscopic right or extended right colectomy for cancer from November 2006 to October 2013 using a standard technique. All patients have been followed up for a minimum of 1 year with abdominal CT scan.

Results

A total of 292 patients were included with a median follow-up of 42 months. Twenty patients (6.8 %) developed ESIH. Obesity (odds ratio (OR) = 3.76, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.39–10.15; p = 0.009) and incision length (OR 2.86, 95 % CI 1.077–7.60; p = 0.035) significantly predisposed to the development of ESIH.

Conclusion

This study identified that the risk of ESIH is significant after colonic resections and there are several risk factors responsible for the development of ESIH.

     

Can the combination of laparoscopy and enhanced recovery improve long-term survival after elective colorectal cancer surgery?

Aim

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes and laparoscopic techniques both provide short-term benefits to patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. ERAS protocol compliance may improve long-term survival in those undergoing open colorectal resection but as laparoscopic data has not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of the combination of laparoscopy and ERAS management on 5-year overall survival.

Methods

A dedicated prospectively populated colorectal cancer surgery database was reviewed. Patient inclusion criteria were biopsy-proven colorectal adenocarcinoma, undergoing elective surgery undertaken with curative intent. All patients were managed within an established ERAS programme and routinely followed up for 5 years. Overall survival was measured using the log-rank Kaplan-Meier method at 5 years.

Results

Eight hundred fifty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Four hundred eighty-one (56%) cases were laparoscopic with 98 patients (20%) requiring conversion. There were no differences in patient or tumour demographics between the surgical groups. Median ERAS protocol compliance was 93% (range 53–100%). Five-year overall survival was superior in laparoscopic cases compared with that of converted and open surgery (78 vs 68 vs 70%, respectively, p < 0.007). An open approach (HR 1.55, 95%CI 1.16–2.06, p = 0.002) and delayed hospital discharge (> 7 days, HR 1.5, 95%CI 1.13–1.9, p = 0.003) were the only modifiable risk factors associated with poor survival.

Conclusions

The use of a laparoscopic approach with enhanced recovery after surgery management appears to have long-term survival benefits following colorectal cancer resection.

     

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 3-year follow-up outcomes

purpose

We wished to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic and open surgery for patients with rectum cancer through a meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database until June 30, 2015, to identify eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open surgery for rectum cancer were included. Meta-analysis was performed using the search strategy following the requirement of the Cochrane Library Handbook. Three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the main endpoints.

Results

Eight randomized controlled trials comprising 3145 patients matched the selection criteria. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference between laparoscopic and open surgery in 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio (HR)_{3-year OS} = 0.83, 95 % CI [0.68–1.01]; P = 0.06; HR_{3-year DFS} = 0.89, 95 % CI [0.75,1.05]; P = 0.16). No evidence of publication bias was observed.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis supported the notion that based on the 3-year DFS and OS, oncological outcomes are comparable after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer.