Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity with Linear Gastroenterostomy

Background: Laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) is a well-established procedure for the surgical management of morbid obesity. Most surgeons create the gastroenteral anastomosis by using the circular EEA stapler. We describe an alternative laparoscopic anastomotic technique using the EndoGIA linear stapling device. Methods: The stomach was proximally transected with a linear stapler (45 mm, Endo-GIA) to create a 15 to 20 ml pouch. Next, an antecolic Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy was performed, using the 45 mm Endo-GIA. The proximal loop of the intestine was then separated from the anastomotic site by the Endo-GIA. Finally, the Endo-GIA was used for the intraabdominal creation of a side-to-side enteroenterostomy. Results: Between June and August 2001, 5 patients with mean BMI 56.7 kg/m²±7.3 underwent LGBP. All patients were seen 6 months post-surgery. Operating time was 7.5 and 6.5 hours for the first 2 operations, but was under 4.5 h for the next 3 cases. 1 patient suffered from perioperative hypoxia leading to long-term artificial respiration. 6 weeks after surgery, 1 patient developed obstruction due to torsion of the enteroenterostomy and required open revision. The 3 remaining patients made an uneventful recovery. All patients lost considerable weight (mean 36.5 kg; [range 32 to 45] after 6 months). No stenosis or anastomotic leakage was noted. Conclusions: A linear stapled anastomosis is an alternative to the use of the circular stapler.     

Bowel Obstruction after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Bowel obstruction has been frequently reported after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). The aim of this study was to review our experience with bowel obstruction following LRYGBP, specifically examining its etiology and management and to strategize maneuvers to minimize this complication. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 9 patients who developed postoperative bowel obstruction after LRYGBP. Each chart was reviewed for demographics, timing of bowel obstruction from the primary operation, etiology of obstruction, and management. Results: 9 of our initial 225 patients (4%) who underwent LRYGBP developed postoperative bowel obstruction. The mean age was 46 ± 12 years, with mean BMI 47 ± 9 kg/m². 6 patients developed early bowel obstruction, and 3 patients developed late bowel obstruction. The mean time interval for development of early bowel obstruction was 16 ±16 days. The causes for early bowel obstruction included narrowing of the jejunojenunostomy anastomosis (n=3), angulation of the Roux limb (n=2), and obstruction of the Roux limb at the level of the transverse mesocolon (n=1). The mean time interval for development of late bowel obstruction was 7.4 ± 0.5 months. The causes for late bowel obstruction included internal herniation (n=2) and adhesions (n=1). 6 of 9 bowel obstructions (66%) were considered technically related to the learning curve of the laparoscopic approach. Eight of the 9 patients required operative intervention, and 6 of the 8 reoperations were managed laparoscopically. Management included laparoscopic bypass of the jejunojejunostomy obstruction site (n=5), open reduction of internal hernia (n=2), and laparoscopic lysis of adhesion (n=1). Conclusions: Bowel obstruction is a frequent complication after LRYGBP, particularly during the learn ing curve of the laparoscopic approach. Specific measures should be instituted to minimize bowel obstruction after LRYGBP as most of these complications are considered technically preventable.     

Laparoscopic Removal of Gastric Band after Open Banded Gastric Bypass

Open banded gastric bypass has been the choice of some bariatric surgeons. This procedure includes a band (of various materials) around the gastric pouch. While there are advantages to this band, erosion and/or displacement of the band may occur. We describe a case of a symptomatic displaced band which was treated by laparoscopic removal. Laparoscopic removal of the band after open banded gastric bypass is feasible. Revision of previous bariatric surgery may be performed laparoscopically if the technical expertise is available.     

Laparoscopic Revision of the Gastrojejunostomy for Recurrent Bleeding Ulcers after Past Open Revision Gastric Bypass

Late complications of open gastric bypass can include malnutrition, weight gain, stomal stenosis, and recurrent bleeding ulcers. Herein, we describe the case of a woman who had recurrent bleeding ulcers, after an open revision of a stenotic gastric bypass. She now underwent an uneventful laparoscopic revision of her gastrojejunostomy and was discharged within 72 hours. Laparoscopic revision of a gastrojejunostomy, even after an open revision following an open gastric bypass, can be done safely.     

Endoscopy after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Community Hospital Experience

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is a common surgical intervention for morbid obesity. Postoperative GI symptoms are common. This study reports the endoscopic findings in symptomatic patients. Methods: Patients who developed GI symptoms after RYGBP at a single community hospital were referred for endoscopic evaluation. Standard endoscopic procedures using standard endoscopic equipment were used. Results: From April 2002 to April 2004, 23 out of 200 patients underwent 35 endoscopic procedures. All patients complained of some degree of epigastric pain, nausea and vomiting regardless of endoscopic findings. The most common endoscopic finding was ulcer disease (12 patients - 52%). Other findings included normal postoperative anatomy (7 patients - 30%), anastomotic stricture (1 patient - 4.3%), obstructed biliopancreatic limb (1 patient - 4.3%), acute gastric pouch bleed (1 patient - 4.3%), anastomotic rupture/dehiscence (1 patient - 4.3%). H. pylori was not detected in any patient. Conclusions: In patients who have had RYGBP, symptoms were a poor predictor of endoscopic pathology. Ulcer disease was the most common endoscopic finding. These ulcers were not associated with H. pylori. All ulcers responded well to oral proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and sucralfate therapy. The community gastroenterologist should be acquainted with the typical post-surgical anatomy and possible endoscopic intervention for RYGBP patients.     

Rhabdomyolysis Following Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Rhabdomyolysis is a rare complication of serious surgical procedures, and constitutes a clinical and biochemical syndrome, caused by injury and destruction of skeletal muscles. It is accompanied by pain in the region of the referred muscle group, increase in creatine phosphokinase levels, myoglobinuria, often with severe renal failure, and finally multi-organ system failure and death, if not treated in time. The main risk factor in the development of postoperative rhabdomyolysis is prolonged intraoperative immobilization of the patient. Morbidly obese patients who undergo laparoscopic bariatric operations should be considered high-risk for rhabdomyolysis, from extended immobilization and pressure phenomena in the lumbar region and gluteal muscles. We report a 20-year-old woman with BMI 51, who underwent a prolonged laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Postoperatively, she presented severe myalgia in the gluteal muscles and lumbar region, oliguria and creatine phosphokinase levels that reached 38,700 U/L. She was treated with intensive hydration and analgesics, and did not develop acute renal failure because diagnosis and treatment were attained immediately.     

A Prospective Evaluation of Intracorporeal Laparoscopic Small Bowel Anastomosis during Gastric Bypass

Background: We evaluated the safety and feasibility of performing a laparoscopic intracorporeal end-toside small bowel anastomosis using a stapling technique as part of a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operation (RYGBP). Methods: 80 consecutive patients who underwent RYGBP with laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy were evaluated. Operative time and intraoperative and postoperative complications directly related to the jejunojejunostomy anastomosis were recorded. Results: All 80 laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy procedures were successfully performed without conversion to laparotomy. Mean operative time was longer for the first 40 laparoscopic RYGBP than for the last 40 RYGBP (32±18 min vs 21±14 min, respectively, p<0.05). Intraoperative complications were staple-line bleeding (2 patients) and narrowing of the anastomosis (1 patient). Postoperative complications were four small bowel obstructions: technical narrowing at jejunojejunostomy site (2 patients), angulation of the afferent limb (1 patient), and food impaction at the jejunojejunostomy anastomosis (1 patient). These four patients underwent successful laparoscopic re-exploration and creation of another jejunojejunostomy proximal to the original anastomosis. There were no small bowel anastomotic leaks. The median time to resuming oral diet was 2 days. Conclusions: Laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy as part of the RYGBP operation is a safe and technically feasible procedure. Postoperative small bowel obstruction is a potential complication, which can be prevented by avoiding technical narrowing of the afferent limb.     

Band Erosion after Laparoscopic Gastric Banding: Occurrence and Results after Conversion to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a popular bariatric operation. Unfortunately, long-term complications such as slippage, infection, and intragastric migration (erosion) may occur. With erosion, band removal is mandatory. Options to prevent weight regain are delayed implantation of a new band, or conversion to another bariatric procedure such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) or biliopancreatic diversion. We present our experience with band erosion and immediate or delayed conversion to RYGBP. Methods: With a multidisciplinary team approach and prospective data collection, a comparison was made between patients with and without band erosion. The patients who were converted to RYGBP for band erosion were analyzed. Results: Gastric banding was performed on 347 patients between 1995 and 2002. Median follow-up is 52 months. Band erosion developed in 24 patients (6.8 %).The latter were heavier before gastric banding (BMI 45.9 vs 43.3, P <0,01). No band had ever been overinflated. Band erosion was diagnosed after a mean of 22.5 months (3-51). At time of diagnosis, mean BMI of 33.5 kg/m² (22.5-48) and average excess weight loss (EWL) of 52.9% (25-97) did not differ from that of the remaining patients at the respective time interval. The band was removed in all cases. Conversion to RYGBP was performed at the same time in 11, and a few months later in 2 patients. Operative morbidity included 1 leak (reoperation) and 4 wound infections. All but 1 patient lost further weight after reoperation, or at least maintained their weight. At last follow-up, mean EWL in relation to the pre-banding weight was 65.1%, and 69.2% of the patients had an EWL >50%, which compares favorably with the results obtained after primary RYGBP. Conclusions: In our series with a median follow-up >4 years, band erosion was more common than usually reported. Band removal with immediate or delayed conversion to RYGBP is feasible with an acceptable morbidity, and prevents weight regain in most cases. These results support further use of this approach for band erosion.     

Laparoscopic vs Open Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Background: The feasibility of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (Lap-RYGBP) for morbid obesity is well documented. In a prospective randomized trial, we compared laparoscopic and open surgery. Methods: 51 patients (48 females, mean (± SD) age 36 ± 9 years and BMI 42 ± 4 kg/m²) were randomly allocated to either laparoscopy (n=30) or open surgery (n=21). All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year. Results: In the laparoscopy group, 7 patients (23%) were converted to open surgery due to various procedural difficulties. In an analysis, with the converted patients excluded, the morphine doses used postoperatively were significantly (p< 0.005) lower in the laparoscopic group compared to the open group. Likewise, postoperative hospital stay was shorter (4 vs 6 days, p<0.025). Six patients in the laparoscopy group had to be re-operated due to Roux-limb obstruction in the mesocolic tunnel within 5 weeks. The weight loss expressed in decrease in mean BMI units after year was 14 and 13 after 1 ± 3 ± 3 laparoscopy and open surgery,respectively (not significant). Conclusions: Both laparoscopic and open RYGBP are effective and well received surgical procedures in morbid obesity. Reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and shorter sick-leave are obvious benefits of laparoscopy but conversions and/or reoperations in 1/4 of the patients indicate that Lap-RYGBP at present must be considered an investigational procedure.     

Reoperative Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: An Experience with 49 Cases

Background: Long-term complications leading to reoperation after primary bariatric surgery are not uncommon. Reoperations are particularly challenging because of tissue scarring and adhesions related to the first operation. Reoperations must address the complication(s) related to the scarring and, at the same time, prevent weight regain that would inevitably occur after simple reversal. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) has repeatedly been demonstrated to be the procedure of choice in most situations. It has traditionally been performed through an open approach. Our aim is to describe our experience with the laparoscopic approach in reoperations to RYGBP over the past 5 years. Methods: All patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGBP as a reoperation were included in this study. Patients with multiple previous operations or patients with band erosion after gastric banding were submitted to laparotomy. Data were collected prospectively. Results: Between June 1999 and August 2004, 49 patients (44 women, 5 men) underwent laparoscopic reoperative RYGBP. The first operation was gastric banding in 32 and vertical banded gastroplasty in 15. The mean duration of the reoperation was 195 minutes. No conversion to open was necessary. Overall morbidity was 20%, with major complications in 2 patients (4%). Weight loss, or weight maintenance, was satisfactory, with a BMI <35 kg/m² up to 4 years in close to 75% of the patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic RYGBP can be safely performed as a reoperation in selected patients provided that the surgical expertise is available. These procedures are clearly more difficult than primary operations, as reflected by the long operative time. Overall morbidity and mortality, however, are not different. Long-term results regarding weight loss or weight maintenance are highly satisfactory, and comparable to those obtained after laparoscopic RYGBP as a primary operation.     

Laparoscopic Splenectomy Combined with Revision of Previous Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Advanced laparoscopic operations can be performed in patients who have previously undergone laparoscopic gastric bypass, because there are fewer adhesions than after open procedures. Also, revisions of previous laparoscopic gastric bypasses can be done laparoscopically for the same reasons. To demonstrate this, we present a patient who had undergone a laparoscopic gastric bypass. The operation was successful initially. After 10 months, she started to regain some of her lost weight. It was also found that she had developed idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, which was unresponsive to steroids. She underwent a splenectomy and revision of her gastric bypass, both done laparoscopically. This case demonstrates that these advanced laparoscopic procedures can be performed safely, even after previous surgery.     

Evaluation of Intra-abdominal Pressure after Laparoscopic and Open Gastric Bypass

Background: Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) postoperatively can adversely affect cardiovascular, pulmonary,and renal function. In this prospective, randomized trial, we compared the IAP in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass (GBP) surgery. Methods: 64 patients with a body mass index of 40 to 60 kg/m² were randomized to undergo laparoscopic or open GBP.IAPs were obtained at baseline (after induction of anesthesia), immediately after the operation, and on post-operative day (POD) 1, 2, and 3. Intraoperative and postoperative fluid requirements, urine output, and creatinine clearance were recorded. Results: Demographics of the two groups were similar. IAP increased from baseline immediately after laparoscopic and open GBP (p < 0.05). IAP returned to baseline by POD 2 after laparoscopic GBP but remained elevated through POD 3 after open GBP. In fact, IAP was lower after laparoscopic _{GBP than after open GBP on POD 1, 2 and 3 (p <} 0.05).The amount of intraoperative IV fluid was similar between groups, but laparoscopic GBP required less IV fluid and facilitated higher urine output post-operatively than open GBP.There was no significant difference in creatinine clearance between groups. Conclusions: Laparoscopic GBP resulted in significantly lower IAP, less postoperative fluid required, and greater postoperative urine output than open GBP.     

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with 2-metre Long Biliopancreatic Limb for Morbid Obesity: Technique and Experience with the First 150 Patients

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is being performed widely as a treatment of choice for morbid obesity. We present our method and experience with the first 150 consecutive cases of laparoscopic RYGBP with a 2-m long biliopancreatic limb (BP-limb). Methods: Between November 2001 and November 2003, a prospective analysis of 150 patients was performed identifying technical success and complications. Before surgery, patients underwent a strict multidisciplinary behavioral program. At operation the stomach was transected proximally with a linear stapler (60-mm, Endo-GIA) to create a prolongation of the esophagus (gastric tube) along the lesser curvature, resulting in a 40-50 ml pouch. Two meters of the proximal jejunum were bypassed (BP-limb), creating an antecolic Roux-en-Y gastro-jejunostomy to the posterior wall of the gastric tube using a 45-mm linear Endo-GIA stapler. The entero-anastomosis was created 50 cm below the gastro-jejunostomy, also with a 45-mm linear Endo-GIA. Results: Mean BMI was 50.0, and 78% of patients were females. With 100% follow-up, we found an EWL of 50% 6 months after surgery, gradually rising to 80% after 18 months. The mean operating time was 116 min for the first 50 cases and decreased to 82 min for the last 50 cases. Intestinal leakage occurred in 5 patients (3%) and bleeding in 5 (3%). Most of these complications occurred in the first 50 cases, and all but one were treated successfully with an early laparoscopic re-operation. Marginal ulcers were found in 16.6% of patients. No internal hernias have occurred. Conclusion: The operation demands advanced laparoscopic skills, but technically it is relatively simple and has an acceptable complication rate. Short-term results regarding excess weight loss are at least comparable to the RYGBP with a long alimentary limb.     

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass versus Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding in the Super-obese: A Comparative Study of 290 Patients

Background: Controversy exists regarding the best surgical treatment for super-obesity (BMI >50 kg/m 2 ). The two most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide are laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). We undertook a retrospective single-center study to compare the safety and efficacy of these two operations in super-obese patients. Methods: 290 super-obese patients underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery: 179 LAGB and 111 LRYGBP. Results: There were one death in both groups. The early complication rate was higher in the LAGB group (10% vs 2.8%, P<0.01). Late complication rate was higher in the LAGB group (26% vs 15.3%, P<0.05). Operating time and hospital stay were significantly higher in the LRYGBP group. LRYGBP had significantly better excess weight loss than LAGB (63% vs 41% at 1 year, and 73% vs 46% at 2 years), as well as lower BMI than LAGB (35 vs 41 at 18 months). Conclusion: LRYGBP results in significantly greater weight loss than LAGB in super-obese patients, but is associated with a higher early complication rate.     

Laparoscopic Pouch Resizing and Redo of Gastro-jejunal Anastomosis for Pouch Dilatation following Gastric Bypass

Background: With a dramatically increasing number of bariatric operations performed world-wide in the recent years, more late complications have been noticed. Proximal gastric pouch dilatation is a known late complication after laparoscopic or open restrictive surgery for morbid obesity. In the present paper, we report our experience with laparoscopic re-operation of enlarged gastric pouches after laparoscopic gastric bypass, with emphasis on technique and outcome. Methods: Data were retrieved from a prospective database of 334 patients who underwent a laparoscopic gastric bypass operation at the University Hospital of Zurich from July 2000 to December 2004. Five laparoscopic revisions for pouch dilatation after primary bypass were performed. Results: 3 female and 2 male patients with median age 40 years (range 32-55) underwent a laparoscopic pouch resizing. At the time of the re-operation, the median BMI was 32.0 kg/m² (range 28.4-48.4). All procedures were performed laparoscopically with no conversion to open surgery. The median operating-time was 110 minutes (95-120). The median hospital stay was 6 days (range 5-14). The median BMI in the follow-up of 12 months (9-14) was 28.0 kg/m² (25.5-45.8). Diabetes mellitus improved in 4 cases during follow-up. Conclusion: Laparoscopic pouch resizing with redo of the gastro-jejunal anastomosis was feasible, safe and effective in this small series. It led to further weight loss and improved symptoms of poor pouch emptying.     

The Orientation of the Antecolic Roux Limb Markedly Affects the Incidence of Internal Hernias after Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Background: Internal herniation of the bowel may be a late complication after the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). A seemingly minor change in technique is described that significantly prevents herniation behind the Roux limb mesentery. We hypothesized that internal hernias behind the Roux limb mesentery occur more frequently when the Roux limb is oriented such that the distal tip is toward the lesser curvature of the gastric pouch with the bowel then curving to the patient's left, compared with the opposite orientation. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of our prospectively collected database. A change in surgical technique occurred June 2003, in an attempt to reduce internal hernia formation. We compared 200 consecutive antecolic left-oriented RYGBP operations performed immediately previous to June 2003 (Group A) with 200 consecutive antecolic right-oriented RYGBP operations performed after June 2003 (Group B). Results: There was an 9.0% rate of internal hernia formation in Group A (18/200) and a 0.5% rate of internal hernia formation in Group B. Internal hernias were repaired an average of 1.2 years after surgery (range 4–30 months, median 14.3 months). The average length of follow-up was 2.1 and 1.6 years in Groups A and B, respectively. All herniations were behind the Roux limb mesentery. The difference in hernia formation after the change in technique was significant (P<0.005). Conclusions: With a simple change in technique, the incidence of internal herniation behind the Roux limb mesentery may be significantly reduced or eliminated.     

Flexible Endoscopy in the Management of Patients Undergoing Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Flexible upper endoscopy (FUE) is an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the management of upper gastrointestinal diseases. We examined the role of FUE in the management of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). Methods: All patients undergoing RYGBP at a single institution from 1986 to 2001 were studied. Preoperative FUE was performed by the surgeon to assess the anatomy of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. Since 1997, gastric biopsies were obtained, testing for the presence of H. pylori. Colonized patients were treated preoperatively. Postoperatively, FUE was performed by the surgeon as indicated clinically,for management of symptoms suggesting anastomotic stenosis, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, inflammation, or ulcers. Endoscopic balloon dilatation was performed as indicated. Results: 560 patients underwent RYGBP during the study period. Of these, 536 underwent preoperative FUE. Endoscopic findings changed or altered the operative procedure in 26 patients (4.9%). Preoperative testing for H. pylori was performed on 206 patients, of whom 62 (30.1%) were positive. Patients tested for H. pylori had a lower incidence of postoperative marginal ulcers (n=5, 2.4%) than did patients who did not undergo such screening (n=354, 6.8%, P <0.05). Postoperatively, 54 patients underwent 80 endoscopic balloon dilatations for stenosis of the gastrojejunostomy. In addition, 18 patients underwent 28 FUEs that proved negative for such stenosis. In addition, 64 patients underwent 88 additional diagnostic or therapeutic FUEs in the postoperative period, including investigation of symptoms of pain, bleeding, persistent vomiting, or weight regain. Conclusion: Upper endoscopy is a tool which may be used by the surgeon in the preoperative and postoperative management of patients undergoing RYGBP to modify therapy, improve outcomes, and diagnose and treat postoperative complications.     

Management of Acute Bleeding after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: The authors reviewed the incidence of hemorrhage after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of this complication and to evaluate various treatment options. Material and Methods: The records for 450 consecutive patients who had undergone LRYGBP over a 30-month period, were retrospectively reviewed. In all patients, the abdominal cavity had been drained with 2 19-Fr closed suction drains. The charts of patients who had developed an intraluminal or an intraabdominal bleed were chosen for further review. Results: 20 patients (4.4%) developed an acute postoperative hemorrhage. The bleeding was intraluminal in 12 cases (60%), manifested by a drop in hematocrit, tachycardia and melena. The other 8 patients (40%) developed intra-abdominal hemorrhage, confirmed by large bloody output from the drains. 3 patients (15%) with intraluminal bleeding were unstable and required a reoperation. All others were successfully treated with observation, and 15 patients (75%) required blood transfusions. Conclusions: The diagnosis and treatment of acute intraluminal bleeding after LRYGBP represents a surgical dilemma, mainly due to the inaccessibility of the bypassed stomach and the jejuno-jejunostomy, as well as the risks associated with early postoperative endoscopy. The presence of large intra-abdominal drains allows for bleeding site localization (intraluminal vs intraabdominal) and for more accurate monitoring of the bleeding rate. Most cases respond to conservative therapy. Failure of conservative management of intraluminal bleeding, however, is more problematic and may require operative intervention. A treatment algorithm is proposed.     

Early Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage after Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Background: Early gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage after open gastric bypass has been infrequently reported. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of early GI hemorrhage after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP), its presentation, and possible treatment options. Methods: A retrospective review of 5 patients who developed early postoperative GI hemorrhage after LRYGBP was performed.The charts were reviewed for demographics, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment. All patients underwent a transected LRYGBP with creation of the gastrojejunostomy anastomosis with a circular stapler and the jejunojejunostomy anastomosis with a linear stapler. Results: Of the 155 patients in our database who underwent LRYGBP, 5 (3.2%) developed early clinical GI hemorrhage. There were 2 males with an average age of 40 years. Clinical presentations of GI hemorrhage were hematemesis (2 patients), bright red blood per rectum (1 patient), melena (1 patient), and hypotension (1 patient). A diagnostic study (nuclear scintigraphy) was performed in only 1 of 5 patients. 3 of 5 patients were managed nonoperatively; 2 patients required fluid and blood resuscitation, and the other patient was managed without blood transfusion. The onset of hemorrhage in these 3 patients occurred 24 hours postoperatively or later. 2 of 5 patients required operative intervention for control of hemorrhage. The onset of hemorrhage or hypotension in these 2 patients occurred within 12 hours after surgery. The sites of hemorrhage were at the gastric remnant staple-lines in 1 patient and at the gastrojejunostomy and gastric remnant staple-lines in the other patient. Conclusion: Early GI hemorrhage is a potential complication after transected LRYGBP. Early reoperative intervention should be performed for patients with hemodynamic instability and patients with early onset of hemorrhage after surgery.     

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Subtotal Gastrectomy

Laparoscopic gastric bypass is a common procedure for morbid obesity. After gastric bypass, the distal stomach is unavailable for surveillance. When a suspicious distal gastric lesion is present preoperatively, a distal subtotal gastrectomy may be needed. Herein we describe such a case performed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic gastric bypass with subtotal gastrectomy for morbid obesity should be considered for patients with suspicious distal gastric lesions.