Long-term results of mycophenolate mofetil as part of immunosuppressive induction therapy after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to the induction protocol resulted in a lower incidence of rejection episodes. However, the question whether MMF should be administered in combination with tacrolimus or cyclosporine has not been answered yet. In our study, we report on the long-term results of triple induction therapy after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), consisting of MMF and low-dose corticosteroids, in combination with either tacrolimus or cyclosporine. METHODS: Between March 1996 and April 1997, 120 consecutive patients, who underwent OLT at our institution, were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 80 received triple induction therapy consisting of cyclosporine and MMF (40) or tacrolimus and MMF (40), in combination with low-dose corticosteroids, whereas the remaining 40 patients served as 'MMF-free' control group receiving dual induction therapy with tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Besides the eight-yr follow-up of patient and graft survival, clinical data were also reviewed for episodes of rejection and infection. Additionally, the early post-operative pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA, immunological active metabolite of MMF) were evaluated. RESULTS: Long-term results provided higher patient and graft survival after tacrolimus/MMF-based induction therapy than after cyclosporine/MMF-based induction therapy. However, the tacrolimus-based control protocol yielded similar results and, therefore, no significantly superior effect was observed when MMF was added. The same observation was made for incidence of rejection and infection episodes. AUC and C(max) of MPA increased in combination with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine. CONCLUSIONS: Although pharmacological synergy between tacrolimus and MMF was observed, MMF showed no significant beneficial effects in the immunosuppressive induction protocol, neither in combination with tacrolimus nor with cyclosporine.     

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal and conversion to mycophenolate mofetil and steroids in cardiac transplant recipients with chronic renal failure: a word of caution

Abstract: Background: Chronic renal failure (CRF) is a common complication of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐based immunosuppression following cardiac transplantation (HTx). The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the impact of an immunosuppressive conversion from CNIs to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids in cardiac transplant recipients with CRF on renal and cardiac graft function. Methods: Since 1999, 12 HTx recipients (10 men; 58 ± 3.6 yr of age; 8.7 ± 4.2 yr after HTx) with CNI‐based immunosuppression and a calculated creatinine clearance (CreaCl) <50 mL/min were included. Most patients (10/12) were on cyclosporine and two patients were on tacrolimus prior inclusion. MMF was started with 0.5 g/d and adjusted according to the target trough levels (2–4 ng/mL). Prednisone dosage was 0.4 mg/kg. Subsequently, CNIs were completely withdrawn. Acute rejection episodes were excluded one and three months after conversion by endomyocardial biopsy and by echocardiography every three months thereafter. Results: After a mean follow‐up of 20 ± 16 months, CreaCl improved significantly: pre‐conversion vs. post‐conversion: 32.8 ± 12.2 mg/dL vs. 42.8 ± 21.14 mg/dL, p = 0.03. However, four acute rejection episodes occurred and patients were reconverted to CNIs. Additionally, six patients had a new onset of graft vessel disease (GVD) one yr after conversion. As a result of these adverse events, the study was stopped after inclusion of only 12 of the scheduled 30 patients. Conclusions: Conversion to MMF and steroids after HTx improves renal function, but increases the risk for recurrent rejection and GVD. Therefore, MMF and steroids should only be considered in patients with a markedly low risk for rejection.     

Conversion of renal transplant recipients from cyclosporin to low-dose tacrolimus for refractory rejection

Abstract Twenty-five patients with refractory rejection following renal transplantation were converted from cyclosporin to tacrolimus in an attempt to salvage the allografts. All patients had received two or three pulses of methylprednisolone, 6 had OKT3, 14 had antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and 2 had both OKT3 and ATG prior to conversion. The median time from transplantation to conversion to tacrolimus was 32 days (range 12–322). Patients underwent a simple switch from cyclosporin- to tacrolimusbased therapy with tacrolimus administered at a median dose of 0.15 mg/kg per day. Doses were adjusted according to clinical response and trough blood levels. Twenty-one of the 25 patients (84 %) with refractory rejection showed evidence of reversal of rejection as indicated by a significant reduction in serum creatinine (Student's paired t -test, P < 0.05) following conversion to tacrolimus. None of these patients had further episodes of rejection. Three patients had ongoing rejection and returned to dialysis, and 1 patient showed deteriorating renal function associated with a cytomegalovirus infection. Of 18 patients currently on tacrolimus, 15 have improved renal function and 3 have shown no further deterioration. We conclude that low-dose tacrolimus appears to be effective in salvaging renal allografts with resistant rejection.     

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil on recurrent rejection in kidney transplant patients

PURPOSE: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a valuable adjunctive agent in renal transplantation. However, due to intolerable adverse effects associated with MMF use in our transplant population, we have used MMF selectively in patients at high risk for recurrent graft rejection, since these patients are known to be at risk for poor long-term graft outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of MMF in preventing the recurrence of acute rejection following an initial rejection episode in kidney transplant patients in the first year following transplantation. METHODS: Forty-four kidney transplant recipients were given MMF prospectively following treatment of their initial rejection episode to prevent recurrent rejection. MMF 1-2 g/d was given. Doses were adjusted based on tolerance; MMF therapy was to be continued for at least 6 months. The control group consisted of 124 consecutive kidney transplant recipients who had received standard anti-rejection therapy without the addition of MMF. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted predominantly of cyclosporine, prednisone+/-azathioprine. Anti-rejection therapy for both groups consisted of either corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 500 mg i.v. for 3 d or oral prednisone 2 mg/kg/d with rapid taper over 3 wk), OKT3 5 mg/d for 10 d or ATG 15 mg/kg/d for 10 d. All rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy. RESULTS: The majority of rejection episodes were characterized histologically as mild or moderate. Most patients (76%) received corticosteroids for treatment of their first rejection episode. There was a 68% reduction in the incidence of recurrent rejection episodes within the first year of transplant in patients receiving MMF; only 14% of recipients receiving MMF developed recurrent rejection compared to 44% of patients in the control group (p<0.05). Approximately 50% of patients developed MMF-associated adverse effects (leukopenia, GI toxicity). Only 52% of patients remained on MMF at 6 months. One-yr graft survival was 86% in the MMF group and 89% in the control group (p>0.05). One-year patient survival was 93 and 100%, respectively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of MMF to maintenance therapy for patients experiencing acute renal allograft rejection may prevent recurrent rejection episodes in the subsequent follow-up year.     

Tacrolimus rescue therapy for children with acute renal transplant rejection

Seventeen children with renal transplants (11 living-related, age 2–18 years) were converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus because of acute rejection that failed to respond to high-dose corticosteroids. Resistance to corticosteroids was confirmed by renal biopsy in 14 patients, and assumed in 3 patients because of failure of serum creatinine to improve to baseline values. Four patients were also treated with OKT3, and 15 children had been receiving mycophenolate maintenance therapy prior to conversion to tacrolimus. Rejection occurred at 2–174 weeks post transplant (mean 52 weeks). Actuarial 1- and 2-year graft survival was 87% and 78%. Three children progressed to end-stage renal disease after 4, 12, and 13 months of tacrolimus. The remaining 14 children have functioning allografts after 20–168 weeks of treatment (mean 80 weeks). All 14 children exhibit stable or improved renal function: serum creatinine 1.1±0.7 mg/dl versus 2.0±0.9 mg/dl prior to tacrolimus. In conclusion, tacrolimus was effective therapy for both early and late acute rejection in children who failed to respond to high-dose corticosteroids. No significant short-term adverse effects were encountered. Received: 29 August 2000 / Revised: 31 July 2001 / Accepted: 31 July 2001     

Elective withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, and prednisone

In a retrospective study we investigated the risk of acute rejection after the withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 39 adult patients treated with cyclosporine (CyA), prednisone, and MMF for at least 6 months following renal transplantation. After reaching a stable renal graft function, MMF was withdrawn and CyA and prednisone were continued. Preceding the withdrawal of MMF, four patients experienced an acute rejection. During a median follow-up of 38 months after discontinuing MMF, no acute rejection occurred. The mean serum creatinine level did not change during the first 6 months after withdrawal of MMF. We conclude that elective withdrawal of MMF in stable renal transplant recipients at 6 months after transplantation bears no important risk of an occurrence of acute rejection. Received: 24 November 1999 Revised: 11 May 2000 Accepted: 18 December 2000     

Steroid withdrawal at 3 months after kidney transplantation: a comparison of two tacrolimus-based regimens

The 6 month prospective, randomized study compared the steroid-sparing potential of two tacrolimus-based regimens after renal transplantation. A total of 489 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/steroids (n = 243; group Tac/MMF/S) or tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids (n = 246; group Tac/Aza/S). At 3 months, steroids were tapered off in 267 (54.6%) patients free from steroid-resistant acute rejection and with serum creatinine concentrations <160 micromol/l. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at month 3 was lower in group Tac/MMF/S compared with group Tac/Aza/S (18.1% vs. 26.0%,P = 0.035). Moreover, more patients in the Tac/MMF/S group met the criteria for steroid withdrawal than in the Tac/Aza/S group (60.5% vs. 48.8%; P < 0.01). The incidence of acute rejection during months 4-6 was low in all groups, both for patients on steroid-free dual therapy (Tac/MMF: 2.7%, Tac/Aza: 0.8%) and for patients who continued steroid maintenance therapy (Tac/MMF/S: 3.5%, Tac/Aza/S: 7.1%). Moreover, kidney function was well preserved in steroid-free patients with month 6 median serum creatinine levels of 119.5 micromol/l (Tac/MMF), and 115.1 micromol/l (Tac/Aza). For patients who continued to receive steroids, month 6 median creatinine levels were 130.5 micromol/l (Tac/MMF/S) and 132.8 micromol/l (Tac/Aza/S). The criteria for the selection of patients to discontinue steroids were adequate. Both tacrolimus-based regimens allowed the safe discontinuation of steroids in low-risk patients at month 3. The Tac/MMF combination was superior in the prevention of acute rejections and more patients met the chosen criteria for steroid withdrawal.     

Discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil from a tacrolimus-based triple regimen 2 months after renal transplantation: a comparative randomized multicentre study

Previous clinical data suggested that with a tacrolimus-based regimen adjunctive immunosuppressives may be withdrawn after an initial treatment period. This study investigated the early discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from a standard triple regimen. Patients were randomized either to receive a continued tacrolimus/MMF/steroids triple regimen (control group) or to reduce and then stop the MMF dose (MMF stop group). Both groups received identical daily tacrolimus and corticosteroid doses. The initial MMF dose was 1 g/day in both arms, but in the MMF stop group the dose was reduced to 0.5 g/day from week 7 to week 12 and then stopped. The intent-to-treat population consisted of 74 (control) and 78 (MMF stop) patients. MMF was tapered off as planned in 82.9% of the patients in the MMF stop arm. The 6-month incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was similar in both arms (21.6% control, 16.7% MMF stop). Graft loss occurred in 5.4% (control) and 3.8% (MMF stop) of the patients. MMF could be safely discontinued from a tacrolimus-based triple therapy early after transplantation without any rebound in efficacy during the 6-month follow-up period. (Name of registry: ClinicalStudyResults.org, number: FG-02-CEE-01, date: 9 June 2006).     

Mycophenolate mofetil added to immunosuppression after liver transplantation – first results

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used successfully as an immunosuppressive agent after kidney and heart transplantation, but experience with MMF after liver transplantation is still limited. Between August 1995 and January 1996, we treated 20 patients with MMF after orthotopic liver transplantation in an open, prospective study. Five out of eight patients with acute rejection and one patient with early chronic rejection showed a complete response after MMF was added to the immunosuppression. Three patients with chronic rejection did not improve, one died, and two have stable graft function at present. In eight patients who suffered from toxicity, a reduction in the dosage of tacrolimus was attempted with simultaneous MMF therapy. One patient died due to multiple organ failure. Liver function improved completely in one other patient, and partially in three patients after adding MMF. In the remaining three patients, a reduced dosage of tacrolimus or cyclosporin, together with MMF, reduced toxicity, not significantly. In conclusion, MMF appears to be a safe and potentially useful adjuvant immunosuppressive agent for rescue and maintenance therapy. Received: 15 August 1996 Accepted: 6 December 1996     

Pre-Transplant Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Activity is Associated with Clinical Outcome After Renal Transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity, is usually administered as a standard dose of 1 g b.i.d. after renal transplantation. Because MMF dose reductions are associated with inferior outcome, we investigated pre-transplant IMPDH activity, MMF dose reductions and outcome. IMPDH activity was determined in isolated peripheral mononuclear cells immediately prior to renal transplantation. We observed considerable inter-individual variability in pre-transplant IMPDH activity (9.35 +/- 4.22 nmol/mg/h). Thirty of 48 patients (62.5%) with standard MMF dose (1 g b.i.d.) had dose reductions within 3 years post-transplant; these patients also had significantly lower IMPDH activity. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) for prediction of dose reduction within 6 months post-transplant was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61-0.89; p < 0.004). IMPDH activity above the cut-off value, MMF dose reduction and age of recipient were significant contributors for the occurrence of acute rejection in the multivariate logistic regression. Patients with high IMPDH activity and MMF dose reduction had the highest rejection rate (81.8% vs. 36.4%; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Patients with low IMPDH activity experienced more complications of MMF therapy. High pre-transplant IMPDH activity and MMF dose reductions were associated with rejection. Determination of IMPDH activity prior to transplantation may help to improve MMF therapy after renal transplantation.     

Pharmacokinetics of daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine and steroids in renal transplantation

Daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) decrease the incidence of acute allograft rejection. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed primarily to assess the pharmacokinetics of MMF in an immunosuppressive regimen incorporating daclizumab. At five centers, 75 renal transplant recipients were randomized 2:1 to receive either daclizumab 1 mg/kg or placebo pre-transplantation and every other week, for a total of five doses. All patients received cyclosporine, steroids, and MMF. Levels of mycophenolic acid (MPA), its glucuronide metabolite, and daclizumab were measured after dosing on days 28 and 56. Safety parameters evaluated included: adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, infections, patient/graft survival, incidence of lymphoproliferative disorders, and incidence of acute rejection at 12 months. The concomitant administration of daclizumab and MMF had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of MPA: AUC(0-8) values (microg h/mL +/- SD) on day 28 were 30.1 +/- 13.3 for daclizumab-treat patients vs. 31.1 +/- 12.4 for placebo and on day 56, 37.7 +/- 18.2 for daclizumab-treated patients vs. 35.7 +/- 14.0 for placebo. Adverse events were similar between the two groups. Acute rejection at 12 months occurred in 14% of patients receiving daclizumab and 20% of patients receiving placebo. The coadministration of daclizumab did not result in a pharmacokinetic interaction with MPA, the active metabolite of MMF.     

Combination therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil: effects of early and late minimization of mycophenolate mofetil after renal transplant

The objectives of the study were: (i) to compare the efficacy and safety of minimizing mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) early (30 d) or late (90 d) after renal transplantation, when used in combination with tacrolimus; (ii) to retrospectively investigate factors associated with early, acute rejections and (iii) to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and diltiazem. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study was conducted in 124 de novo kidney transplant recipients. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed for 180 d after transplantation and subjects were followed-up for a mean duration of 5.1 yr. The efficacy and safety outcomes were comparable whether the dose of MMF was minimized early or late. The incidence of early, acute rejection episodes was higher for recipients who were younger, received a graft from an unrelated donor or failed to achieve adequate tacrolimus concentrations (trough > 10 ng/mL) in the first seven d after transplant. Concomitant use of diltiazem had a tacrolimus-sparing effect in some subjects. Based on these results, we support the achievement of a high target tacrolimus concentration within the first week after renal transplant and suggest that early minimization of MMF can be achieved when used in combination with tacrolimus.     

Safe conversion of mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients with sirolimus-based immunosuppression

Aim:   Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a powerful immunosuppressive drug with established efficacy and safety. The long-term use of MMF may bring increased risk of for infection and malignancy and also increased cost of transplantation. The search for minimization of immunosuppressive protocol has led to an open randomized clinical trial of conversion from MMF to azathioprine (AZA).
Methods:   A total of 50 kidney allograft recipients treated with prednisone, sirolimus and MMF were randomized into two groups: converted (AZA group) and continuing (MMF group). The average duration of MMF therapy prior to conversion was 43 months in each group. Inclusion criteria included: patients with serum creatinine levels of less than 200 µmol/L; no past history of acute vascular rejection or recent acute rejection 6 months before randomization; and normal liver function tests.
Results:   Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. During the 12 month observation period, there were no acute rejection episodes in either group. There were no significant differences in overall patient or graft survival or function. AZA-treated patients had a lower incidence of gastrointestinal complications ( P  = 0.03). Daily cost reduction in the AZA group was more than $US8.79/day per patient.
Conclusion:   In general, replacing MMF with AZA in stable renal transplant recipients is well tolerated and was cost effective with no increased risk of rejection. As the this study was on relatively small samples, larger and longer follow-up studies will be needed to confirm these expected advantages for the long-term outcome and to assess the long-term safety of this minimization of immunosuppressive therapy.     

The use of daclizumab as induction therapy in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in recipients with previous transplants

Clinical trials using daclizumab as induction therapy in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes in solid organ transplantation. In an attempt to obtain a low rejection rate we proceeded with the use of daclizumab as induction therapy, in combination with TAC and MMF for recipients with previous transplants. In this study, we analyzed patients who received previous transplants, treated with the above immunosuppressive regimen. Group A consisted of four patients with previous liver transplants, group B consisted of 16 recipients with previous kidney transplants and group C consisted of three patients with previous simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. All patients underwent cadaveric kidney transplants except one patient in group B, who underwent a pancreas transplant. At 12 months, patient and graft survival for all groups was 100 and 100%, respectively. Acute rejection rate was 0% for group A, 12.5% for group B, and 0% for group C. Daclizumab induction therapy is effective for patients with previous transplants and does not appear to increase the risk of acute rejection.     

Tacrolimus combined with two different corticosteroid-free regimens compared with a standard triple regimen in renal transplantation: one year observational results

Krämer BK, Klinger M, Wlodarczyk Z, Ostrowski M, Midvedt K, Stefoni S, Citterio F, Pietruck F, Squifflet J‐Paul, Segoloni G, Krüger B, Sperschneider H, Banas B, Bäckman L, Weber M, Carmellini M, Perner F, Claesson K, Marcinkowski W, Vítko ?, Senatorski G, Salmela K, Nordström J. Tacrolimus combined with two different corticosteroid‐free regimens compared with a standard triple regimen in renal transplantation: one year observational results.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: E1–E9. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Side effects of steroid use have led to efforts to minimize their use in transplantation. Two corticosteroid‐free regimens were compared with a triple immunosuppressive therapy. Data from the original intent‐to‐treat (ITT) population (153 tacrolimus/basiliximab [Tac/Bas], 151 tacrolimus/MMF [Tac/MMF], and 147 tacrolimus/MMF/steroids [control]) were analyzed in a 12‐month follow‐up. Percentage of graft survival were 92.8%, 95.4%, and 95.9% (KM estimates 89.9%, 95.3%, 95.9%), percentage of surviving patients were 98.7%, 98.0%, and 100% (KM estimates 95.9%, 92.8%, and 100%). During months 7–12, graft loss occurred in 3 Tac/Bas, 2 Tac/MMF, and zero control patients, patient deaths in 1 Tac/Bas, 2 Tac/MMF, and zero control, and biopsy‐proven acute rejection episodes in 4 Tac/Bas, 3 Tac/MMF, and zero control. Mean serum creatinine at month 12 was 141.9 ± 69.6 μM, 144.0 ± 82.1 μM, and 134.5 ± 71.2 μM (ns). New‐onset insulin use in previously non‐diabetic patients at month 12 was 1/138, 6/127, and 4/126. Patient and graft survival as well as renal function at 12 months were not different between patient groups, despite considerably higher rates of acute rejection occurring within the first six months after transplantation in both steroid‐free patient groups. Tac/Bas therapy might offer benefits in terms of a trend for a more favorable cardiovascular risk profile.     

Long-Term Use of Mycophenolate Mofetil is Associated With a Reduction in the Incidence and Risk of Late Rejection

To evaluate the association of long-term continuous (minimum 1 year) mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) vs. azathioprine (AZA) therapy with the incidence of late acute rejection, we analyzed 47 693 primary renal allograft recipients reported to the United States Renal Data System between 1988 and 1998. The primary study endpoint was acute rejection beyond 1 year after transplantation. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the risk of reaching the study endpoints. All multivariate analyses were corrected for potential confounding covariates. Mycophenolate mofetil was associated with a 65% decreased risk of developing late acute rejection as compared to AZA (RR = 0.35, CI 0.27-0.45, p < 0.001). The incidence of acute rejection episodes at 2 and 3 years post-transplantation was significantly lower in the MMF group (0.9% at 2 years, 1.1% at 3 years) than the AZA group (6.1% at 2 years, 9.3% at 3 years). In the primary vs. repeat late rejection analysis, MMF patients exhibited a decreased late acute rejection risk of 72% (RR = 0.28, p < 0.001) and 60%, respectively (RR = 0.40, p < 0.001). In African Americans, the late acute rejection risk was 70% lower in MMF patients than AZA patients (RR = 0.30, p < 0.001). Further study is indicated to determine the optimal duration of MMF therapy after renal allograft transplantation.     

The impact of mycophenolate mofetil dosing patterns on clinical outcome after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has proven to be a very effective drug for the prevention of acute rejection following renal transplantation when dosed as prescribed at 2 or 3 g/d. However, circumstances arise in clinical transplantation where the dose must be lowered, either to avoid drug toxicity or because of concurrent infection. The impact on the incidence of acute rejection and graft survival when the MMF dose must be lowered has not previously been investigated. METHODS: In this study, a cohort of 721 kidney transplant recipients who received immunosuppression using MMF in conjunction with cyclosporine and prednisone and OKT3 (n = 425) or Simulect (n = 296) induction were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared and contrasted between patients with and without MMF dose changes within the first year post-transplantation. RESULTS: The majority of patients (70.3%, n = 507) had at least one dose change within the first post-transplant year. Compared with the 214 patients who did not have a dose change, these patients had a much higher incidence of acute rejection within the first post-transplant year (23.3% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). This resulted in a significantly decreased 3-yr death-censored graft survival (76.3% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.003). The incidence of acute rejection for patients who had a dose change was highest if the dose change occurred within the first post-transplant month (34.4%). The incidence of acute rejection for the dose change patients was influenced by recipient ethnicity (African-American vs. Caucasian) and the type of induction agent used (OKT3 vs. Simulect). CONCLUSION: Altering the dose of MMF within the first post-transplant year correlated with a significantly worse clinical outcome in this cohort of renal transplant recipients. These data suggest that avoidance of MMF dose changes within the first year after renal transplantation would result in improved graft survival.     

Efficacy and cardiovascular safety of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and early steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients: a multicenter, prospective, pilot trial

This single-arm, open-label, pilot study was designed to assess the efficacy and cardiovascular safety profile of daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal interleukin (IL)-2Ralpha antibody, in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, and early corticosteroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients. Seventy-nine renal allograft recipients were treated with daclizumab (1 mg/kg; five doses starting on the day before transplant and then every two weeks), MMF (1 g b.i.d.), tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg/d), and low-dose prednisolone, which was withdrawn at day 150 after transplant. The rate of acute rejection was determined at 12 months. Lipid profile, oral glucose tolerance, and adverse events were monitored. Of the 76 patients eligible for analysis, eight (10.5%) developed biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Ten (13.2%) experienced clinical and/or BPAR. Corticosteroids were withdrawn completely in 91% of patients at 12 months. Graft and patient survival were 97.5% and 98.7% respectively. Mean total cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly lower at 12 months post-transplant than at baseline (201 +/- 47.5 vs. 190.8 +/- 43.6 mg/dL, p = 0.005 and 196.2 +/- 133.2 vs. 144.5 +/- 76.8 mg/dL, p < 0.001, respectively). Mean hemoglobin A1c levels did not differ between baseline (5.54%) and 12 months (5.48%). New-onset post-transplant diabetes mellitus occurred in 6.6% of the non-diabetic transplanted patients. The proportion of patients with abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was 47% at 3 months and 39% at 12 months (p = NS). Daclizumab induction in combination with MMF, tacrolimus, and low-dose (followed by withdrawal) prednisolone appears to be effective and safe in patients receiving renal allografts. The regimen appears to be associated with a favorable cardiovascular profile.     

A single center's clinical experience with quadruple immunosuppression including ATG or IL2 antibodies and mycophenolate mofetil in simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplants

Acute rejection remains a major problem in simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) transplant and occurs in 60–100% of the cases.
With the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) replacing azathioprine (AZA) as a basis immunosuppressant, reduced rates of rejection have been reported. This study investigates the frequency and clinical relevance of allograft rejection in SPK patients receiving anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG) or Basiliximab® induction therapy and cyclosporine Neoral® (CyA), MMF, steroid basis immunosuppression.
Between December 1996 and October 1999, 21 consecutive patients (15 males, 6 females) received a SPK transplant at our institution with a mean±standard deviation (SD) age of 42±6 yr. Of these, 14 patients were treated with anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG) Fresenius® (rabbit) 3–5 mg/kg for 6±2 d, cyclosporine Neoral (CyA) (trough levels 350–400 ng/mL), MMF 3 g/d and low dose steroid therapy. Seven SPK patients were treated with Basiliximab (Simulect®, Novartis 20 mg on d 0 and d 4 post‐transplant) instead of ATG. The patients had an average human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch of 3.9/6 and a negative cross match. All patients remained on triple drug therapy. Three patients were switched to tacrolimus instead of Neoral for CyA intolerance. The mean±SD cold ischemia time (CIT) of the organs was 10.1±2.4 h for the pancreas and 10.5±2.6 h for the kidney.
Results: Biopsy‐proven rejection occurred in the kidney of 1 ATG patient (8%), which responded to steroid bolus therapy. One of the patients (14%) with Basiliximab induction developed renal allograft rejection, which was resolved after a 6‐d course of anti‐CD3 mAb (OKT3) treatment. All patients (100%) were free from rejection in the pancreas, as measured by urine amylase levels and glycemic control without the need for exogenous insulin with a mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA₁C) of 5.1±0.7% and serum creatinine with a mean of 1.24±0.24 mg/dL in a mean follow‐up period of 17±15 months (median 12, range 2–37).
Conclusion: Triple drug immunosuppression including cyclosporine, MMF and low dose steroids with ATG or interleukin 2 (IL2) receptor antibodies induction therapy appears to be a very suitable immunosuppressive regimen for combined pancreas–kidney transplant (PKT) with a marked reduction in the incidence of rejection.     

Tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil can effectively reverse C4d-positive steroid-resistant acute rejection in Chinese renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (TAC) combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been suggested to play a critical role in the reversal of C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) in renal transplantation, but the efficacy of using only TAC-MMF without immunoadsorption or plasmapheresis has not been investigated. On the other hand, Chinese recipients of renal grafts usually need lower doses of immunosuppressants, and their optimal treatment for acute humoral rejection has not been established. METHODS: Since 1999, we have used TAC-MMF to treat steroid-resistant acute rejection (AR). C4d staining was retrospectively performed in 32 patients with steroid-resistant AR, and the treatments of 19 patients with C4d-positive steroid-resistant AR were investigated. RESULTS: Thirteen of 19 patients received TAC-MMF treatment only; 11 episodes of rejection in them were reversed (7 completely, 4 partially) and only 2 recipients lost their graft. Another 6 patients received immunoadsorption also. One of them failed to respond and lost her graft. Four of 5 patients treated with immunoadsorption and TAC-MMF recovered (3 completely, 1 partially), but 3 of them had severe pneumonia, a complication rate statistically higher than in patients treated with only TAC-MMF (P<0.05). AR occurring during the first two weeks after transplantation had a statistically better outcome than that occurring later (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the combination of TAC and MMF is a potentially safe and economic treatment for most Chinese renal allograft recipients with C4d-positive steroid-resistant AR, especially for rejections developing within the first two weeks after transplantation.