The relationship between central corneal thickness-adjusted intraocular pressure and glaucomatous visual-field loss.

BACKGROUND: Although measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) is increasingly becoming an important component of glaucoma risk analysis, significant controversy exists regarding the benefit of calculating a corrected intraocular pressure (IOP) value from measured IOP and CCT data. METHODS: Three hundred forty-four male subjects were identified from a VA eye clinic with one of the following clinical diagnoses: ocular hypertension (OHT), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and normal tension glaucoma suspect (NTGS). Using one eye per subject, multivariate logistic regression and correlational analyses were performed to determine relationships between glaucomatous visual-field loss and several glaucoma risk factors, including adjusted IOP values. RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis did not identify CCT-adjusted IOP values as independent risk factors for development of either NTG or POAG-related glaucomatous visual-field loss. CCT, however, was found to be strongly associated with both NTG and POAG-related visual-field loss. Correlational analysis revealed a weak correlation between Ehlers-adjusted pre-treatment IOP and severity of POAG-related visual-field loss, but no other adjusted IOP values significantly correlated with severity of visual-field loss in either POAG or NTG. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that adjusted IOP, as calculated using current algorithms, is not useful within glaucoma risk analysis, since adjusted IOP was unable to predict either presence or severity of glaucomatous visual-field loss in this study. CCT, conversely, was found to be a robust and independent predictor of glaucomatous visual-field loss. These findings, while supporting routine CCT measurements for all glaucoma suspects, do not support routine clinical computation of adjusted IOP values using current algorithms.     

Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the relationships between glaucomatous visual field loss and intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by both Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All primary open-angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients seen between July 2005 and June 2006 with at least 2 sets of good-quality, bilateral DCT and GAT measurements were retrospectively identified. Additional inclusion criteria required that all subjects had repeatable, asymmetric glaucomatous visual field loss that corresponded with asymmetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy. After mean IOP values were computed and visual fields were scored using Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) criteria, paired-eye comparisons were conducted using right versus left eyes and higher versus lower AGIS-score eyes. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (42 primary open-angle glaucoma, 25 normal tension glaucoma) subjects met all criteria for study inclusion. Per paired t test, mean DCT-IOP was significantly higher in the higher AGIS-score eyes compared with the lower AGIS-score eyes (16.3 vs. 15.5 mm Hg, P=0.004), whereas GAT-IOP was not significantly different in these same eyes (14.5 vs. 14.4 mm Hg, P=0.56). Mean IOP difference between the 2 methods was significantly larger in higher versus lower AGIS-score eyes (P<0.001), and 72% of the subjects demonstrated larger intermethod IOP differences in their higher AGIS-score eye compared with their lower AGIS-score eye (P<0.001; 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.82). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that AGIS-score differences between eyes were independently associated with both intermethod IOP differences between eyes (P=0.004) and central corneal thickness (CCT) differences between eyes (P=0.04). CCT, however, was not associated with intermethod IOP differences within or between eyes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that DCT-IOP is correlated with glaucomatous damage, and moreover, DCT-IOP is more closely related to extent of glaucoma damage than is GAT-IOP. The most likely explanation for these results is that GAT-IOP systematically underestimates IOP compared with DCT-IOP. Our findings also support the hypothesis that corneal biomechanical factors other than CCT are major confounders of applanation tonometry measurements.     

Relationship between asymmetric central corneal thickness and glaucomatous visual field loss within the same patient.

PURPOSE: Considering that thinner central corneal thickness (CCT) has been identified as a significant glaucoma risk factor, this study was designed to determine whether patients with glaucoma with asymmetric CCT demonstrate greater visual field loss in their thinner CCT eye compared with their thicker CCT eye. METHODS: Patient logs were used to retrospectively identify patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) with CCT asymmetry of 10 microm or greater. Severity of glaucoma was determined using Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) visual field scoring criteria. After statistical analysis was used to compare all thinner CCT eyes vs. corresponding thicker CCT eyes, subjects with worse visual field loss in the thinner CCT eye were compared with subjects with worse visual field loss in the thicker CCT eye. Subanalysis was then completed using only subjects with CCT asymmetry of 15 microm or greater. RESULTS: In the 52 subjects who met all criteria for study inclusion, mean AGIS score was significantly higher in the thinner CCT eyes compared with the thicker CCT eyes. Subjects with higher AGIS score in their thinner CCT eye outnumbered subjects with higher AGIS score in their thicker CCT eye, with the differences approaching statistical significance in the full sample (p = 0.06) and achieving significance when analysis was limited to subjects with CCT asymmetry of 15 microm or greater (p = 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified thinner CCT as the primary risk factor associated with higher AGIS score in subjects with CCT asymmetry of 15 microm or greater. CONCLUSION: These results correspond to prior reports implicating CCT as an independent risk factor for glaucomatous visual field loss. When significant CCT asymmetry is present in patients with glaucoma, the thinner CCT eye is at greater risk for more advanced visual field loss. The underlying nature of this increased risk is unknown, but further study into structural vulnerabilities associated with thinner CCT seems justified.     

相干光断层扫描仪检测正常人及青光眼患者中央角膜厚度

目的探讨相干光断层扫描仪(OCT)测量正常人、原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)、高眼压症(OHT)患者的中央角膜厚度(CCT)。方法采用OCT3测量正常人143例(143只眼)、POAG患者36例(36只眼)、NTG患者39例(39只眼)及OHT患者40例(40只眼)的CCT,并进行单因素4水平设计定量资料的方差分析;用线性回归方法分析正常人CCT与Goldmann压平眼压测量值的相关关系;对OCT测量CCT观察者间和观察者内的一致性进行类内相关系数(ICC)分析。结果正常组、POAG组、NTG组及OHT组的平均CCT值分别为(523.66±32.13)μm、(530.92±27.32)μm、(506.92±21.49)μm及(573.13±27.39)μm。POAG组与正常人组的平均CCT值差异无统计学意义(P=0.099);OHT组的平均CCT值大于其他各组,均P<0.01;NTG组的平均CCT值小于其他各组,均P<0.01。正常组CCT与眼压值呈正相关(r=0.318,R2=0.101,P<0.01)。OCT测量CCT的测量者间和测量者内的ICC值分别为0.995和0.996。结论OCT可以准确地测量CCT;NTG患者平均CCT比正常人薄,而OHT患者比正常人厚;CCT可以影响Goldmann压平眼压计的测量值,但贡献率较小。(中华眼科杂志,2006,42:199-203)     

Diurnal fluctuation and concordance of intraocular pressure in glaucoma suspects and normal tension glaucoma patients

PURPOSE: The study objective was to determine the concordance of intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma suspects (GS) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of diurnal curves of untreated GS and NTG patients. No subject had IOP greater than 21 mm Hg. We defined GS patients as having suspicious optic nerves with normal visual fields, and NTG patients as having glaucomatous optic nerves with associated visual field loss. Goldmann applanation tonometry was performed at 10:00, 13:00, 16:00, 19:00, 22:00, and 07:00. Linear association of OD and OS IOP was estimated using Pearson correlation coefficient (r). The diurnal period was divided into 7 time intervals of 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 hours, and the absolute difference in change in IOP between fellow eyes and probability that it was within 3 mm Hg were calculated. RESULTS: The study included 68 GS and 95 NTG subjects. The diurnal curves of the OD and OS showed a parallel course in both groups. The average correlations (r) of OD and OS IOP over the 6 time points were 0.78 and 0.81 for GS and NTG, respectively. The mean absolute difference in IOP change between OD and OS over the 6 time intervals ranged between 1.4 and 1.9 mm Hg for GS, and 1.3 and 1.5 mm Hg for NTG subjects. The probability that this difference was within 3 mm Hg ranged between 87% and 94% for GS, and 86% and 93% for NTG subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The diurnal variation in IOP between the 2 eyes in GS and NTG is largely concordant in approximately 90% of the time.     

开角型青光眼与正常大陷凹眼中视乳头旁萎缩区的比较研究

目的研究原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)与正常大陷凹眼的视乳头旁脉络膜萎缩区(PPA)的差异及其与视野的关系。方法利用计算机图像分析系统对拍摄的视乳头立体图像进行测量,比较42例(42只眼)POAG、40例(40只眼)NTG与45例(45只眼)正常大陷凹眼之间PPA的发生率及大小差异,分析PPA的有关参数与视乳头结构指标、视野分级之间的相关性。所有入选患者的屈光度(等效球镜度数)均在+3.00~-3.00D之间。结果正常大陷凹组、POAG组及NTG组α区的出现率分别为85.4%、100.0%、95.0%,β区的出现率分别为19.1%、48.9%、37.5%,POAG组和NTG组的α区和β区的出现率均大于正常大陷凹组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。正常大陷凹组、POAG组及NTG组β区面积分别为(0.08±0.25)、(0.24±0.36)、(0.14±0.21)mm2,POAG组的β区面积大于正常大陷凹组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组的α区面积差异无统计学意义(Chi-Square=4.534,P=0.104)。而POAG组与NTG组间上述各指标及α区和β区出现率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。青光眼患者视乳头结构指标与视野相关分析结果表明,杯/盘比值与视野受损分级之间有较强相关性(r=0.5624,P<0.01)。而α区面积、β区面积与视野受损分级之间均为低相关性(α区:r=0.246,P<0.01;β区:r=0.2302,P<0.01)。有无青光眼性视野缺损相关因素的Logistic回归分析结果显示,在包括年龄、性别、屈光度、杯/盘比值分级指标及α区面积和β区有无的多个因素中,仅年龄和杯/盘比值分级指标被证实为两个可能的影响因素。结论排除了-3.00D以上的中高度近视人群后,POAG和NTG患者的α区和β区出现率及β区面积虽与正常大陷凹者有所不同,但其与视野缺损程度的相关性较传统的视乳头结构指标低,在两组青光眼患者间也未见明显差异。由此认为PPA不能作为诊断POAG的独立指标,也不能作为POAG与NTG的鉴别诊断指标。     

角膜厚度与高眼压症及青光眼的眼压

目的 探讨高眼压症、正常眼压性青光眼、原发性开角型青光眼患者及正常人的角膜厚度差异,分析角膜厚度与眼压间的关系,以及角膜厚度的测定对各型青光眼的诊断意见。方法 用超声波角膜测厚仪检测７３例（７３只眼）高眼压症、７９例（７９只眼）正常人的中央角膜厚度,并将其测定结果进行比较。回顾性分析每只青光眼治疗前的最高眼压（Ｇｏｌｄｍａｎｎ）,包括２４ｈ眼压曲线,用Ｅｈｌｅｒ法通过中央角膜厚度对眼压进行校正。结     

Circadian fluctuation of mean ocular perfusion pressure is a consistent risk factor for normal-tension glaucoma

PURPOSE: To investigate systemic and ocular hemodynamic risk factors for glaucomatous damage in eyes with normal tension glaucoma (NTG). METHODS: Each patient with diagnosed NTG underwent 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure (IOP) and blood pressure (BP), scanning laser polarimetry (GDx-VCC), and a Humphrey visual field (HVF) examination. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate potential risk factors: age, spherical equivalent, central corneal thickness (CCT), mean/peak in-hospital IOP, circadian IOP fluctuation, average mean arterial pressure (MAP), circadian MAP fluctuation, and circadian fluctuation of mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP). Functional outcome variables for glaucomatous damage were mean deviation (MD), pattern SD (PSD), and Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) score. Anatomic outcome variables were TSNIT (temporal, superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal) average, superior average, inferior average, and nerve fiber indicator (NFI) on GDx-VCC. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen eyes of 113 patients met the inclusion criteria. In the multivariate regression models, larger circadian MOPP fluctuation was significantly associated with decreased MD, increased PSD, and increased AGIS score among functional outcome variables and with reduced TSNIT average, reduced inferior average, and increased NFI among anatomic outcome variables. Larger MAP fluctuation was associated with decreased MD, increased PSD, reduced TSNIT average, reduced inferior average, and increased NFI. CCT was not associated with any outcome variable. CONCLUSIONS: Of the functional and anatomic outcome variables, circadian MOPP fluctuation was the most consistent clinical risk factor for glaucoma severity in eyes with NTG. This finding may suggest an etiology of NTG as a chronic ischemic end organ disease.     

Association between corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in glaucomatous and non‐glaucomatous eyes

Purpose: We aimed to determine corneal hysteresis values (CH) using the ocular response analyser (ORA) in non‐glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes and their relationship with central corneal thickness (CCT). Methods: Corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and CCT were prospectively evaluated in 74 non‐glaucoma subjects with IOP < 21 mmHg and in 108 patients with treated primary open‐angle glaucoma (POAG). One eye in each subject was randomly selected for inclusion in the analysis. Results: Mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age was 59.2 ± 14.2 years in the non‐glaucoma group and 62.4 ± 9.8 years in the glaucoma group. Mean (± SD) GAT IOP was 15.7 ± 2.65 mmHg and 16.38 ± 2.73 mmHg in the non‐glaucoma and glaucoma groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in mean age (p = 0.396) or mean GAT IOP (p = 0.098). Mean (± SD) CH was 10.97 ± 1.59 mmHg in the non‐glaucoma and 8.95 ± 1.27 mmHg in the glaucoma groups, respectively. The difference in mean CH between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). There was a strong positive correlation between CH and CCT in the non‐glaucoma group (r = 0.743) and a significantly (p = 0.001) weaker correlation (r = 0.426) in the glaucoma group. Conclusions: Corneal hysteresis was significantly lower in eyes with treated POAG than in non‐glaucomatous eyes. The corneal biomechanical response was strongly associated with CCT in non‐glaucoma subjects, but only moderately so in glaucoma patients. It can be assumed that diverse structural factors, in addition to thickness, determine the differences in the corneal biomechanical profile between non‐glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes. Corneal hysteresis could be a useful tool in the diagnosis of glaucoma.     

Sequential office pressure measurements in the management of glaucoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of day-long sequential office measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) to make therapeutic decisions in patients with progressive glaucomatous damage despite apparently 'controlled' IOP. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 93 consecutive glaucoma patients (185 eyes) who underwent sequential office IOP measurements (every hour from 7 AM to 5 PM on a single day). These included 53 patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 12 glaucoma suspects (GS), and 28 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) whose visual field deteriorated despite apparently 'controlled' IOP. Only one eye per patient was included in the study. RESULTS: The pattern of the day-long IOP curve was similar in the 3 groups of patients. IOPs were highest in the early morning hours in all groups. The mean +/- SD of the IOP range was 5 +/- 2 mm Hg. An IOP > 21 mm Hg was found in 3 eyes (3%), whereas a range of IOPs > 5 mm Hg was detected in 33 eyes (35%). In the NTG group, there was a significant correlation between visual field deterioration and the peak and range of IOP (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Day-long sequential office IOP measurements are useful in selected patients who demonstrate progressive glaucomatous damage. Early morning measurements are most frequently highest. The range of IOP may be as important, or more important than, the peak IOP level.     

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements with scanning laser polarimetry predict glaucomatous visual field loss

PURPOSE: To assess whether baseline retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements obtained with a scanning laser polarimeter, the GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, (Laser Diagnostic Technologies Inc., San Diego, California) are predictive of development of repeatable glaucomatous visual field damage in glaucoma suspect eyes. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: Participants were recruited from the UCSD longitudinal Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS). One eye from each of 160 glaucoma suspects with normal standard automated perimetry (SAP) visual fields at baseline was studied. Study eyes were divided into convert and nonconvert groups based on the development of three consecutive glaucomatous visual fields during follow-up. SLP parameters, IOP, vertical cup disk ratio, stereophotograph assessment as glaucoma or normal, corneal thickness, and visual field indices were included in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to determine which SLP RNFL and ocular parameters were predictive of visual field conversion. RESULTS: Sixteen (10%) eyes developed repeatable visual field damage (converts) and 144 (90%) did not (nonconverts). Mean (95%CI) follow-up time until visual field conversion for convert eyes was 2.7 (1.7, 3.6) years. Mean total follow-up of nonconvert eyes was 3.8 (3.5, 4.1) years. Four out of thirteen examined baseline SLP parameters and baseline SAP Mean Deviation (MD), SAP Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD), and glaucomatous stereophotograph assessment were significant univariate predictors of visual field conversion. In multivariate models adjusted for age, IOP and CCT, SLP parameters inferior ratio, ellipse modulation, and UCSD linear discriminant function (LDF) were significant predictors of visual field conversion. When SAP PSD and stereophotograph assessment were also included in the multivariate model inferior ratio and UCSD LDF remained independently predictive of visual field loss. CONCLUSIONS: Thinner baseline SLP RNFL measurements were independent predictors of visual field damage. In addition to thinner SLP RNFL measurements, higher baseline SAP PSD, and baseline glaucomatous stereophotograph assessment each contributed to an increased risk of the development of abnormal visual fields in glaucoma suspect patients. SLP RNFL measurements were independently predictive of future visual loss even when age, IOP, CCT, vertical cup disk ratio, and SAP PSD were included in the model.     

正常眼压性青光眼诊断中存在的问题

患者具有典型的青光眼视盘损害、视野缺损、前房角开放、眼压正常，并排除眼部或全身性疾病引起的视神经病变，即可诊断为正常眼压性青光眼。准确的眼压测量、两次以上24小时眼压曲线描记以及对眼部和全身可能原发疾病的排除在诊断过程中至关重要。     

Relationship between central corneal thickness and severity of glaucomatous visual field loss in a primary care population.

BACKGROUND: Although the ability of central corneal thickness (CCT) to predict development of primary open-angle glaucoma has become increasingly well recognized, the ability of CCT to predict severity of glaucoma remains uncertain. This study was designed to expand the available knowledge about the relationship between CCT and glaucoma severity. METHODS: Retrospective identification of all patients with a clinical diagnosis of either primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension who were seen from September 2002 through May 2003 at the Albuquerque VA Medical Center eye clinic was completed. Eligible subjects were segregated into no, mild, moderate, or advanced visual field loss groups based on Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) visual field scoring criteria. Following statistical analyses comparing the visual field groups, the sample was divided into thin, intermediate, and thick CCT groups, and further analysis was performed. RESULTS: Mean CCT was significantly higher in the no field loss group compared with all 3 groups with glaucomatous visual field loss. Mean CCT was not statistically different, however, between the mild, moderate, and advanced visual field loss groups. In linear regression analyses, no significant relationship was found between CCT and severity of visual field loss. CONCLUSIONS: Although CCT was associated strongly with development of POAG-related visual field loss, CCT was not associated with severity of visual field loss in this study. These findings suggest that glaucoma patients with thinner corneas are just as likely to have advanced levels of field loss as glaucoma patients with thicker corneas. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.     

Clinical Characteristics of Glaucomatous Subjects Treated with Refractive Corneal Ablation Surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical characteristics of newly diagnosed glaucomatous subjects who had a history of refractive corneal ablation surgery (RCAS).

Methods

Sixty-eight glaucomatous subjects who had a history of RCAS and 68 age- and visual field (VF) mean deviation-matched glaucomatous subjects with no history of RCAS were included. Intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), VF, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness determined by optical coherence tomography were assessed. Parameters were compared between patients with and without a history of RCAS. Between-eye comparisons in the same participant (more advanced vs. less-advanced eye, in terms of glaucoma severity) were performed in the RCAS group.

Results

With similar levels of glaucoma severity, those with a history of RCAS showed significantly lower baseline IOP and a thinner CCT than the eyes of individuals without a RCAS history (13.6 vs. 18.7 mmHg, 490.5 vs. 551.7 µm, all p < 0.001). However, the extent of IOP reduction after anti-glaucoma medication did not significantly differ between the two groups (17% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.144). In the between-eye comparisons of individual participants in the RCAS group, the more advanced eyes were more myopic than the less-advanced eyes (-1.84 vs. -0.58 diopter, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Eyes with a history of RCAS showed a similar level of IOP reduction as eyes without such a history after anti-glaucoma medication. Our finding that the more advanced eyes were more myopic than the less-advanced eyes in the same participant may suggest an association between glaucoma severity and myopic regression.     

Corneal hysteresis measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer® in normal and glaucomatous eyes

Purpose: To identify differences in corneal hysteresis (CH) and central corneal thickness (CCT) between healthy and glaucomatous patients. Methods: Retrospective observational study. One hundred and thirty‐three eyes of 75 healthy and 58 glaucomatous patients were included. CH was measured in each patient using Ocular Response Analyzer. CCT was determined by ultrasonic pachymetry. For each patient, one eye was randomly selected. We used a Student t‐test to search for significant differences between the different groups (p<0.05). Results: In healthy and glaucomatous eyes, mean CH values were 10.46 ± 1.6 and 8.77 ± 1.4 mm Hg, respectively. Mean CCT values were 560.2 ± 36.3 and 535.3 ± 42.7 μm, respectively. CH and CCT were significantly lower in glaucomatous eyes than in normal eyes, (p<0.05). Discussion: In our series, CH was lower in glaucomatous than in normal eyes. The relationship between glaucoma, IOP, and ocular structures may not be confined to the consideration of CCT. A low CH value could be responsible for under‐estimation of IOP. CH could also be a risk factor for glaucoma, independent of IOP. Further studies are needed to support these hypotheses. Conclusion: In our investigation, CCT and CH were significantly lower in glaucomatous eyes than in healthy eyes.     

Comparison of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and visual field loss between different glaucoma groups

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) uses a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope with an integrated polarimeter to evaluate the thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL). The aim of this study was to verify the ability of the SLP to detect differences in RNFL thickness between normal and glaucomatous eyes and between glaucomatous eyes subdivided in groups by the severity of visual field damage. METHODS: This was a cross sectional retrospective study. The charts of 40 healthy subjects and 68 glaucoma patients who underwent complete ophthalmological examination, optic disc stereophotography, peripapillary, and macular SLP imaging were reviewed. The right eye of subjects eligible for the study was enrolled. Only eyes with SLP examinations indicating a minimised effect of anterior segment birefringence based on macular image were included. The ability of retardation parameters to discriminate between healthy and glaucomatous eyes was evaluated. Based on visual field loss, glaucoma patients were subdivided in three subgroups (early, moderate, and severe). RNFL thickness between healthy control group and glaucoma subgroups was compared. RNFL thickness and visual field loss correlation was evaluated. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in superior and inferior maximum RNFL thickness between normal and glaucomatous eyes (p<0.001). With these two parameters, the area under receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.75 and 0.74, respectively. Superior and inferior RNFL thickness was significantly different between healthy control group and all glaucoma subgroups (p<0.001) and between glaucoma subgroups (p<0.05), except for early and moderate glaucoma subgroups (p>0.05). Linear regression showed a weak correlation between RNFL thickness and visual field loss. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that once visual field loss is established, smaller reductions in the RNFL thickness detected by SLP are necessary for a given reduction of mean defect value.     

Relationship between corneal thickness and measured intraocular pressure in a general ophthalmology clinic

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether central corneal thickness (CCT) is a confounding factor in the classification of patients attending for glaucoma assessment in a district general hospital. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study by a single observer. PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending a general ophthalmic clinic: 235 clinically normal eyes, 52 eyes with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 335 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), 12 eyes with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXE), 42 eyes with chronic angle closure glaucoma (CACG), and 232 glaucoma suspect (GS) eyes. INTERVENTION: Central corneal thickness was measured using ultrasonic pachymetry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Correlation of CCT and diagnosis. RESULTS: Mean CCT was 553.9 microm (95% confidence intervals [CI] for the mean, 549.0-558.8 microm) in the clinically normal eyes, 550.1 microm (95% CI, 546.6-553.7 microm) in the POAG eyes, 514.0 microm (95% CI, 504.8-523.3 microm) in the NTG eyes, 530.7 microm (95% CI, 511.2-550.1 microm) in the PXE eyes, 559.9 microm (95% CI, 546.8-573.0 microm) in the CACG eyes, and 579.5 microm (95% CI, 574.8-584.1 microm) in the GS eyes. The differences of mean CCT between the groups were highly significant (P< 0.001 analysis of variance). Eighty-five percent of eyes with NTG and only 36% of eyes with POAG had a mean CCT of 540 microm or less. Thirteen percent of eyes with POAG and 42% of GS eyes had a mean CCT greater than 585 microm. CONCLUSIONS: The CCT measurement is desirable in patients attending for glaucoma assessment in a district general hospital to avoid misclassification resulting from the relationship between CCT and tonometric pressure. Central corneal thickness alone is not an accurate predictor for the clinical diagnosis in this group of eyes. However, many eyes diagnosed as having NTG have thin corneas, which would tend to lower the tonometrically recorded intraocular pressure (IOP), so the finding of a less-than-normal thickness cornea introduces some doubt as to the diagnosis of NTG. For the GS eyes, most eyes had thick corneas, which would tend to increase the tonometrically recorded IOP. Thus, GS eyes with modest elevation of IOP and a thick cornea may be at low risk of progressing to POAG. Thus, many patients with "high IOPs" and a thick CCT do not necessarily have high IOPs and may not need to be followed as GS eyes.     

Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressures (IOP) and ocular pulse amplitudes (OPA) in patients with different types of glaucoma, ocular hypertension (OHT), and normal controls (NC) using dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and the goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). METHODS: 906 eyes of 501 adult patients in the following five groups were included in this cross-sectional study: primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma (PXG), OHT, and NC. The following tests were performed simultaneously during a single visit: IOP using DCT and GAT; OPA using DCT and central corneal thickness (CCT) using ultrasound pachymetry. Mixed effects regression models were used to compare the DCT and GAT IOP measurements in the five groups; the effect of CCT on IOP and the relationship between OPA and IOP within each group. RESULTS: DCT consistently had higher IOP values than GAT in POAG, PXG, NTG, and controls (p < 0.001) but not in OHT (p = 0.84). DCT IOP did not change while GAT IOP showed a non-significant increase (p = 0.09) with increased corneal thickness in each group. OPA was found to be highest in OHT (3.61 mmHg) and lowest in the control group (2.86 mmHg) and significantly increased with IOP in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: DCT measures an IOP that is significantly higher than GAT IOP in glaucoma and control subjects but not in ocular hypertensives. Furthermore, the DCT may measure an IOP that is independent of the CCT, which may not be true for the GAT, which increases with the CCT. OPA was highest in OHT and may be affected by the IOP.     

Open-angle glaucoma: variations in the intraocular pressure after visual field examination

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) variations after automated visual field examination in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and in healthy subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Intraocular pressure was measured in 49 patients (94 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma and in 13 healthy subjects (26 eyes) before and immediately after automated visual field examination. All patients had stable IOP and were using local medication to treat glaucoma. The visual field test was performed with a Humphrey 630 VF analyzer and the Central 30-2 full-threshold program. RESULTS: Mean IOP increased significantly in glaucomatous patients immediately after automated visual field examination (P < 0.01), and returned to pretest values after 1 hour (P = 0.2). Mean IOP variation was 2.38 (range, -6-11) mm Hg. In 42 (44.68%) glaucomatous eyes, IOP increased more than 2 mm Hg, with a mean increase of 5.5 mm Hg. Elderly glaucoma patients showed a significantly higher IOP rise than younger patients. No significant IOP variation was detected in healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Intraocular pressure varied significantly and tended to increase immediately after automated visual field examination in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Age seemed to contribute to these IOP changes, but other factors could be involved.     

The relation between intraocular pressure peak in the water drinking test and visual field progression in glaucoma

AIM: To compare the results of the water drinking test between glaucomatous eyes with and without visual field progression. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 76 eyes of 76 open angle glaucoma patients followed for a mean period of 26.0 (SD 13.8) months. Patients were submitted to the water drinking test at the beginning of the follow up period. Reliable achromatic automated perimetry tests performed during the studied period were used to characterise visual field progression. All subjects were under clinical therapy and had an intraocular pressure (IOP) lower than 17 mm Hg monitored by isolated measurements during the follow up period. The results of the water drinking test were compared between glaucomatous eyes with and without visual field progression. RESULTS: Twenty eight eyes reached definite visual field progression. There were no significant differences in the mean age, sex, race, basal IOP, number of antiglaucomatous drugs, initial mean deviation (MD), and corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD) between eyes that showed visual field progression and the ones who did not progress. A significant difference of 1.9 (SD 0.6) mm Hg (p = 0.001, analysis of covariance; 95% CI 0.8 to 3.0) was observed between glaucomatous eyes that showed visual field deterioration and glaucomatous eyes that did not progress. A significant difference of 16.8% (SD 4.6%) in the mean percentage of IOP variation was also observed between the two groups (p<0.001, analysis of covariance; 95% CI 7.7 to 26.0). CONCLUSIONS: Mean IOP peak and percentage of IOP variation during water drinking test were significantly higher in patients with visual field progression compared with patients who did not progress.