Iloe-ileocolic intussusception: Radiological features and reducibility

This paper concerns ileo-ileocolic intussusception rather than the commoner ileocolic intussusception. diagnostic criteria for ileo-ileocolic intussusceptions are established by retrospective study of radiological findings in 28 surgically proven cases. Using these criteria, 11 successfully reduced cases were found in the corresponding period (28.2%). All were apparently cured after one reduction: the evidence suggests that a small but significant number of ileoileocolic intussusceptions may be safely reduced by normal methods during barium enema.     

Intussusception: evolution of current management

The records of 583 children who were treated for intussusception at the Children's Hospital of Buffalo in the period 1930-1985 were reviewed. Following a change in management in 1970 from operative treatment to hydrostatic reduction of the intussusception by barium enema, two main groups are defined. In earlier years 95% of patients underwent operative reduction whereas in the latter period 92% had barium reduction attempted. The remaining 8% in this group had clinical contraindications for hydrostatic enema attempt. Ten percent had pathological lead points. Recurrent intussusception occurred in 50 cases (8.5%), 66% following barium enema reduction and 33% after surgery. The mortality in the earlier group was 3.9% and 1.3% in the latter group. No deaths occurred in patients treated successfully with barium enema reduction, and there were no deaths in the children with simple uncomplicated intussusception requiring surgery.     

Intussusception. Part 2: An update on the evolution of management

Children with symptomatic ileocolic or ileo-ileocolic intussusceptions can be successfully managed in one of a number of different ways. The nonoperative enema reduction technique has major advantages over surgical reduction and high success rates can be achieved using pneumatic or hydrostatic reduction techniques under fluoroscopic or sonographic guidance. This article highlights current concepts and some controversial issues related to management of intussusception, including patient selection for attempted enema reduction, the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, complications, the value of delayed, repeated reduction attempts, the role of imaging after attempted enema reduction, and recurrence of intussusception.     

Intussusception

Children with symptomatic ileocolic or ileo-ileocolic intussusceptions can be successfully managed in one of a number of different ways. The nonoperative enema reduction technique has major advantages over surgical reduction and high success rates can be achieved using pneumatic or hydrostatic reduction techniques under fluoroscopic or sonographic guidance. This article highlights current concepts and some controversial issues related to management of intussusception, including patient selection for attempted enema reduction, the advantages and disadvantages of each technique, complications, the value of delayed, repeated reduction attempts, the role of imaging after attempted enema reduction, and recurrence of intussusception.     

Documentation of spontaneous reduction of childhood intussusception by ultrasound

Spontaneous reduction of a presumed ileo-colonic intussusception was demonstrated by ultrasound examination followed by a barium enema. No premedication or anesthetic had been given to the child. This case illustrates the possible natural history of intussusception rarely confirmed by imaging studies. Intussusception is the most common abdominal emergency of early childhood [1]. Diagnosis and therapy is usually performed with a contrast enema. If unsuccessful, surgical reduction is indicated. We wish to report a case of spontaneous reduction of a presumed ileocolonic intussusception. This was initially diagnosed by ultrasound examination, but had spontaneously reduced by the time a barium enema was performed.     

Are hydrostatic and pneumatic methods of intussusception reduction comparable?

The hydrostatic pressures and flow rates of barium sulphate and water soluble contrast in concentrations representative of those used for intussusception reduction were measured. The change of height with discharge of fluid from the filled kit was also assessed. A group of experienced paediatric radiologists and radiographers significantly underestimated the height to which contrast should be placed for intussusception reduction. The results indicate that baseline hydrostatic reduction pressures tend to be less and maximum pressures significantly less than those presently advocated for pneumatic reduction. This disparity may account for the apparent improvement in intussusception reduction rates reported for air enema when compared with barium enema. Intraluminal pressure monitoring during contrast enema would aid control of intussusception reduction but hydrostatic reduction would still be at a disadvantage because of lower flow rates. Where hydrostatic reduction is performed, the contrast density and height used should be set to give known pressure, according to local guidelines.     

Intussusception: effectiveness of gas enema

In tertiary paediatric centres, gas enema reduction of intussusception appears to be more effective and perhaps safer than barium enema reduction. Despite the higher success rate of reduction when gas is used, there remain some patients in whom the technique fails but who at operation have an intussusception that theoretically should have been reducible with the gas enema: easy to reduce manually, no necrosis of the bowel, and no pathological lesion at the leadpoint. After a gas enema failed, manual reduction of an intussusception was achieved in 41 of 49 patients and was difficult in less than one-half. It is suggested that a significant proportion might have been reducible had the technique of gas reduction been modified, either by repeating the enema some hours after the first attempt or by using higher insufflation pressures. In practice, clinical features were not useful in predicting in which patients gas enema would be unsuccessful or whether operative reduction would be successful without resection.     

Intussusception: influence of age on reducibility

Our experience of hydrostatic reduction of intussusception by barium enema over the last 7 years is reviewed. There were 115 attempted hydrostatic reductions out of a total of 129 patients diagnosed as having intussusception on barium enema or at surgery. Age at presentation varied from one month to nine years, 81% of patients presenting before one year of age. Of 115 attempted reductions, 63 were successful giving an overall success rate of 55%. Looking at the different age groups, it was found that hydrostatic reduction was much less successful in infants aged 3 months and younger; success rate 20% compared to a 60% success rate in the remainder. Conscious of recent reports in the literature of bowel perforation during attempted hydrostatic reduction in young infants, we suggest that there should be a reappraisal of the role of hydrostatic reduction in the three months and younger age group.     

Enema reduction of intussusception with a small dose of iopamidol may have advantages over barium

Barium enema (B-enema) has been the standard method for hydrostatic reduction of intussusception, although recently air enema has been used due to the lower risk when perforation occurs. Recently, we have administered a small dose of iopamidol during enema reduction (I-enema) in children with intussusception. From November 1989 to December 1993, we treated 50 children with intussusception at Kiyama Hospital. Barium was used in the first half of the period, and iopamidol in the second half. Reduction was successful in 22 of 24 patients with barium (92%) and 23 of 26 with iopamidol (88%); 25 children had the ileocolic type and 25 the ileoileocolic (-cecal) type of intussusception. Operations were carried out in 3 patients from each group. I-enema avoids some of the drawbacks of barium and air enemas. It is a new method of enema reduction, as a contrast medium is injected first. It is possible to obtain a good image of the advanced portion with a small dose of contrast medium, which is important for treatment. For institutions performing B-enemas, I-enemas can be performed easily with the same equipment and technique. It causes less contamination upon leakage than a B-enema, and also has less influence on the intestinal membrane with very few risks if perforation occurs. Better images are obtained than with air. A large dose of contrast medium is not needed, thereby reducing medical expenses to a minimum. Iopamidol can be used safely for enema reduction of intussusception with an expected high success rate.     

The efficiency and limitations of barium enema in the treatment of intussusception in infancy and childhood

Sixty-one children with intussusception were treated during a period of 7 years. A barium enema was routinely performed for diagnosis and treatment unless signs of gangrenous bowel were present. Hydrostatic reduction was successful in 50% of attempts in the idiopathic cases. There were no complications from this procedure and no recurrence of intussusception. At surgery the intussusception was found to be reduced in 6 of 32 patients; 19 underwent operative reduction; and resection was performed in 7. A higher failure rate of hydrostatic reduction was associated with older patient age, longer duration of symptoms, and the presence of a pathological leading point.     

Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children —a comparison of perforation with barium and air

This paper compares the effects on patients of perforation with barium and with air during attempted intussusception reduction by reviewing the clinical, radiological, surgical and pathological findings and sequelae in seven children who received barium and seven who received air. In both groups perforation occurred in infants under 6 months of age (with one exception) with a long duration of symptoms. All patients with barium enema required resection of bowel whereas only four with air enema required resection. Anesthetic times were longer in those patients with barium perforation in whom the intussusception did not move and there was a large leak. The patients with perforation due to air had a shorter hospital stay with decreased morbidity compared to those with perforation due to barium. Perforation occurred through areas of transmural necrosis in a minority of patients in each group. Perforations through normal bowel and shear injury (with air enema) indicate that increased pressure during the examination is an important factor in some patients. Because perforation with air is so much easier to deal with surgically and the children do better clinically, there is a tendency for some to consider perforation with air an inconsequential situation. However, a potential rare complication with this technique is tension pneumoperitoneum. Keeping this in mind, we continue to use air as the contrast of choice because the procedure in our hands is a safe, quicker and easier technique and we have achieved a substantial improvement in reduction rates. Overall reported perforation rates with air enema compare favourably with those due to barium enema.     

Pseudotumoral cecum after hydrostatic reduction of intussusception

The authors report two cases of intestinal intussusception successfully reduced by hydrostatic pressure. A postreduction filling defect in the cecum disappeared spontaneously on follow-up barium enema, and is therefore consistent with cecal edema. It appears an initial period of close observation for such cases is worthwhile, delaying the decision about surgery until after a follow-up barium enema; this may confirm the disappearance of the filling defect.     

Perforation during gas reduction of intussusception

Perforation during attempted gas-enema reduction of intussusception is more common than during a barium enema. In a review of 650 consecutive attempted gas enemas, perforation occurred in 7 infants (1.1%). Gross abdominal distension from the pneumoperitoneum may be rapid and cause splinting of the diaphragm, which leads to acute respiratory distress. This complication is readily recognised at the time of the gas enema, and may require immediate intervention by paracentesis using a 14-gauge needle. A review of 7 children with intussusception in whom perforation occurred revealed that all had radiologic evidence of bowel obstruction (air-fluid levels) prior to the enema, and the patients had had a relatively long history since the onset of symptoms. No perforation occurred during a delayed repeat enema reduction. Perforation during gas enema produces minimal peritoneal contamination. No pathological lesion at the lead point of the intussusception was identified in any of the children in whom perforation occurred.     

高频彩超及全控式水压复位器诊治幼儿肠套叠

目的总结彩超下水灌肠诊治急性肠套叠的经验。方法采用高频超声定位并诊断肠套叠,用彩色多谱勒显像（CDFI）确定套叠部血流动力学改变,判断是否适宜灌肠复位,并用自制全控式水压复位器于高频彩超监测下灌肠复位。同期设立临床诊断70例肠套叠患儿为对照组,经低频（3．5MHz）B超诊断、监测并分次注水灌肠复位。结果72例拟诊幼儿肠套叠病例中明确诊断68例,判断不宜灌肠3例（经手术证实为难复性肠套叠,肠缺血严重。65例以全控式水压复位器于高频彩超监测下灌肠复位全部成功。对照组70例临床诊断幼儿肠套叠病例在低频B超监测下分次注水灌肠复位治疗56例,44例成功。结论全控式水压复位器结合高频彩超治疗幼儿肠套叠较之低频B超分次注水复位法,指征更明确,治疗更安全快速,效果更好,便于基层医院推广。     

Gas reduction of intussusception

Efforts to improve the non-surgical management of childhood intussusception centre around (a) reassessment of selection criteria used to ensure as many children as possible have the advantage of hydrostatic reduction, and (b) improvements and modifications of enema technique to ensure successful and safe reductions without increased morbidity. Reports that pneumatic reduction was highly successful in treating childhood intussusception prompted the authors to evaluate this technique over an 18 month period using our previously reported technique of oxygen at 2 litres/minute and a pressure of 80 mm Hg. Pneumatic reduction was attempted in 114 of 129 consecutive cases of intussusception, and was successful in 85 (75%). Fifteen patients (8.6%) were considered unacceptable risks for gas reduction using our current selection criteria and had primary surgery. The overall success rate considering all cases of intussusception managed at our institution over this period was 66% (85/129). As with any form of hydrostatic reduction, pneumatic reduction of intussusception requires careful selection of patients, meticulous technique, and awareness of complications and their appropriate management. Because of its simplicity and improved success rate, pneumatic reduction has replaced traditional barium reduction at our institution. It may be that with further evaluation of selection criteria, higher pressures, and prolonged attempts that results will improve further.     

Clinical application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intussusception.

Sixty-five consecutive patients seen in a pediatric emergency department, in whom the diagnosis of intussusception was considered, had an ultrasound examination of the abdomen before a barium enema. The mean age of the patients was 1.7 years (range 2 weeks to 5 years). Intussusception was detected by ultrasonography in all 20 cases proved by barium enema. There were three false-positive ultrasound results (sensitivity = 100%, confidence interval (Cl) = 86% to 100%; specificity = 93%, Cl = 86% to 96%). Normal findings on ultrasonography correlated with a negative barium enema results in 42 of 42 cases (negative predictive value = 100%, Cl = 94% to 100%). No intussusception was missed by ultrasonography. To determine which patients would most benefit from ultrasonography, we divided patients into either a high-risk group (81% with intussusception) or a low-risk group (14% with intussusception) on the basis of clinical symptoms (p less than 0.01). If each high-risk child had a barium enema and each low-risk child had an ultrasound study as their initial diagnostic test, 89% of the patients in this study would have undergone only one examination. We conclude that ultrasonography can be used as a rapid, sensitive screening procedure in the diagnosis or exclusion of childhood intussusception. Children considered at low risk of having intussusception on the basis of clinical symptoms should initially have an ultrasound examination; patients at high risk should have an immediate barium enema.     

Utility of hospital admission for pediatric intussusceptions

Purpose

The standard practice in pediatric patients diagnosed with intussusception has been reduction via enema and admission for a period of nil per os and observation. Little data exists to support this practice. The objective of this study was to examine whether post-reduction admission to hospital is required.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients aged 0–18 years old with intussusception over a span of 20 years. Study included children treated for intussusception on first encounter with enema and subsequently admitted for observation. Study excluded those readmitted for recurrence after 48 h, patients whose intussusception did not reduce on first try, those lost to follow-up, and those who went to the operating room. Early recurrence was defined as recurrence within 48 h post-reduction.

Results

Out of 171 patients admitted, only one experienced an early recurrence (0.6 %). Median length of stay for all patients was 2 days. Average cost incurred per day for intussusception admission was $404.

Conclusion

Intussusception in a child that is successfully reduced via enema has a low recurrence rate and is usually followed by prompt resolution of symptoms. An abbreviated period of observation in the emergency department post-reduction may result in healthcare savings.

     

Invagination ileus--stages and progress of treatment

Result from the historic development of the treatment of the intussusception was given an epidemiologic study of the different kinds of possible treatment of infantile intussusception from 1963 to 1988 including 246 affected children. Correlations are established between the duration of anamnesis, the general condition, form of intussusception and possible therapies. Besides indications and contraindications are recommended for hydrostatic and operative evagination as well as for treatment by resection. Furthermore, some conservative methods of treatment are briefly introduced, such as hydrostatic reduction by means of barium enema under x-ray control or by means of visotrast under ultrasonic visualisation, as well as pneumatic reduction.     

PERFORATION OF THE BOWEL DURING BARIUM ENEMA REDUCTION OF INTUSSUSCEPTION IN INFANTS

Two cases of extravasation of barium into the peritoneum following the reduction of an intussusception by barium enema are described. Some of the causes and consequences of this unusual complication are discussed.     

Air reduction of intussusception.

AIM: To show that intussusception in children is reducible in most cases, using air. METHODS: Initially we used a barium enema to treat paediatric intussusception. Now we use an air enema. We consider the latter reduction technique to be the method of choice in the treatment of intussusception in childhood. RESULTS: Over a period of 21 years, we have treated 151 patients presenting with intussusception. In a group of 130 children treated with barium enema we managed to reduce the intussusception in 110 cases (84.6 %). We used air pressure to treat a second group of 21 children; the success rate in this group was 100 %. CONCLUSIONS: In order to avoid a surgical operation this technique must become more generally known. We are of the opinion that if the method is applied correctly, it is almost always possible to correct intussusception using air.