Treatment of asthma with nebulized lidocaine: a randomized, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: In 2 prior uncontrolled studies, nebulized lidocaine reduced oral glucocorticoid use in patients with severe glucocorticoid-dependent asthma. OBJECTIVE: We tested the safety and efficacy of nebulized lidocaine in a randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS: We recruited 50 subjects (25 receiving lidocaine and 25 receiving placebo); all had a prebronchodilator FEV(1) of 64% to 125% of predicted normal value and were treated with daily inhaled glucocorticoids (but not systemic glucocorticoids) and bronchodilators for at least 2 months. Before treatment, subjects monitored their symptoms and peak flow values and maintained their medications for 2 weeks. At initiation, subjects inhaled either nebulized placebo (saline) or lidocaine (4%, 100 mg) 4 times daily. All subjects were instructed to reduce their inhaled glucocorticoid dosage by one half each week for 3 weeks and to discontinue glucocorticoid treatment at week 4. The subjects continued the nebulized lidocaine or placebo for a total of 8 weeks, monitored their symptoms, and used bronchodilators to control symptoms. RESULTS: Indicators of asthma severity showed benefit for the lidocaine-treated group: changes in FEV(1) (P < or =.001), nighttime awakenings (P < or =.02), symptoms (P < or =.010), bronchodilator use (P < or =.010), and blood eosinophil counts (P < or =.020). Subjects in both groups reduced use of inhaled glucocorticoids comparably. Subjects receiving nebulized placebo showed increases in their symptom scores, bronchodilator use (P < or =.05 for both), and blood eosinophil counts (P < or =.01) and decreases in FEV(1) (P < or =.001). CONCLUSION: Nebulized lidocaine provided effective and safe therapy in subjects with mild-to-moderate asthma.     

激素治疗对运动诱发性哮喘患者痰嗜酸性粒细胞计数的影响

目的探讨气道嗜酸性粒细胞性炎症和运动诱发的支气管痉挛（EIB）之间的关系,及其对吸入糖皮质激素（ICS）治疗的反应。方法本研究为随机、双盲、二阶段交叉试验,将26例有运动诱发性支气管痉挛发作史且从未接受过激素治疗的哮喘患者随机分为两组,每组分别给予两个剂量水平的布地奈德吸入：①100μg/d与400μg/d对比;②200μg/d与800μg/d对比。每一阶段为3周,洗脱期3～8周。治疗前及开始治疗后每隔1周进行1次运动激发试验并留取痰液标本行嗜酸性粒细胞计数。结果高剂量ICS治疗（400μg/d和800μg/d）可显著减少痰嗜酸性粒细胞比例。痰嗜酸性粒细胞百分比与运动诱发性支气管痉挛严重程度相关,且对EIB的严重程度有预测作用;高剂量ICS治疗时,尚可预测EIB对激素治疗有效,而对低剂量ICS组（100μg/d和200μg/d）则无预测作用。低剂量ICS治疗,不管基线痰嗜酸性粒细胞计数是否增多,EIB在第1周末发作显著减轻,尔后几无改善。而高剂量ICS治疗对EIB的改善作用在痰嗜酸性粒细胞增多的患者中显著优于嗜酸性粒细胞计数小于5%者,这种明显的差异在开始治疗1周后即显现,且随时间的推移而继续加大。结论气道嗜酸性粒细胞性炎症可能在EIB的发生及其对ICS治疗有效的调节机制中起重要的作用。测定痰嗜酸性粒细胞计数在预测EIB的严重程度及其对不同剂量ICS治疗的反应具有一定的临床应用价值。     

Effect of a 4-week treatment with theophylline on sputum eosinophilia and sputum eosinophil chemotactic activity in steroid-naive asthmatics

BACKGROUND: The precise mechanism of action of theophylline in asthma is not fully understood but recent data have drawn attention to its potential anti-inflammatory effect. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of theophylline on sputum eosinophilia and sputum eosinophil chemotactic activity in steroid-naive asthmatics. METHOD: We performed a 4-week randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in 21 mild to moderate steroid-naive asthmatics whose sputum eosinophilia was found twice > 5% during the run in period. Eleven subjects received 600 mg/24 h theophylline for the first 2 weeks and 900 mg/24 h for the last 2 weeks while 10 subjects took a placebo for 4 weeks. Sputum was induced after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment and 1 week after stopping the treatment. The sputum samples were compared for their cell counts, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels and eosinophil chemotactic activity using micro-Boyden chambers. RESULTS: Serum theophylline concentrations reached 7 and 11 microg/mL at V3 and V4, respectively. Intragroup comparisons showed that theophylline, but not placebo, caused a significant reduction in sputum eosinophil counts at V3 (62 +/- 10% from baseline, P < 0.01) and a strong trend at V4 (67 +/- 16% from baseline, P = 0.07) when compared to baseline. The intergroup difference obtained after comparing the area under the curve over the 4 week treatment period only approached the statistical significance (P = 0.08). At baseline the fluid phase of the sputum contained a significant eosinophil chemotactic activity which was inhibited after a 4-week treatment by theophylline (P < 0. 01) but not by placebo. The mean sputum theophylline levels after 4 weeks of treament (1.7 microg/mL) was lower than that required to cause significant inhibition of eosinophil chemotaxis in vitro. CONCLUSION: Theophylline decreases the natural sputum eosinophil chemotactic activity present in asthmatics. However, when using a small sample size, the 35% reduction in sputum eosinophilia achieved by theophylline failed to reach statistical significance when compared to that seen after placebo.     

Montelukast improves asthma control in asthmatic children maintained on inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Because of potential toxicities of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use in pediatric asthma, alternative or steroid-sparing therapy is desirable. There are no previous studies evaluating montelukast's steroid-sparing effects in children with asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether (1) montelukast as add-on therapy improves asthma symptom control and (2) montelukast provides steroid-sparing effects in children with asthma treated with low to moderate doses of ICS therapy. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 36 children ages 6 to 14 years with symptomatic asthma maintained on a stable low to moderate dose of ICSs were randomly assigned to receive montelukast or matching placebo for 24 weeks after a run-in period of 2 weeks (period I). During the trial, subjects kept daily asthma diary cards and monthly spirometry was performed. After a 4 week add-on period (period II), the subjects completed a 20-week (period III) ICS tapering period based on a predetermined protocol. RESULTS: In period II, the difference in the number of rescue-free days was significantly higher in the montelukast group (P = 0.0001), and the number of rescue-free days per week was also significantly higher in montelukast-treated subjects compared with placebo subjects (P = 0.002). In period III, the percentage reduction in ICS dose was not significant between montelukast and placebo (P = 0.10), but the montelukast group experienced an average 17% decrease in ICS dose and the control group experienced an average 64% increase in ICS dose. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast treatment significantly increased the number of rescue-free days in symptomatic children with asthma.     

Characterization of within-subject responses to fluticasone and montelukast in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND: Responses to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) vary among asthmatic patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether responses to ICSs and LTRAs are concordant for individuals or whether asthmatic patients who do not respond to one medication respond to the other. METHODS: Children 6 to 17 years of age with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma were randomized to one of 2 crossover sequences, including 8 weeks of an ICS, fluticasone propionate (100 microg twice daily), and 8 weeks of an LTRA, montelukast (5-10 mg nightly depending on age), in a multicenter, double-masked, 18-week trial. Response was assessed on the basis of improvement in FEV 1 and assessed for relationships to baseline asthma phenotype-associated biomarkers. RESULTS: Defining response as improvement in FEV 1 of 7.5% or greater, 17% of 126 participants responded to both medications, 23% responded to fluticasone alone, 5% responded to montelukast alone, and 55% responded to neither medication. Compared with those who responded to neither medication, favorable response to fluticasone alone was associated with higher levels of exhaled nitric oxide, total eosinophil counts, levels of serum IgE, and levels of serum eosinophil cationic protein and lower levels of methacholine PC(20) and pulmonary function; favorable response to montelukast alone was associated with younger age and shorter disease duration. Greater differential response to fluticasone over montelukast was associated with higher bronchodilator use, bronchodilator response, exhaled nitric oxide levels, and eosinophil cationic protein levels and lower methacholine PC(20) and pulmonary function values. CONCLUSIONS: Response to fluticasone and montelukast vary considerably. Children with low pulmonary function or high levels of markers associated with allergic inflammation should receive ICS therapy. Other children could receive either ICSs or LTRAs.     

Control of airway inflammation maintained at a lower steroid dose with 100/50 microg of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) have been shown to reverse epithelial damage and decrease lamina reticularis thickness in patients with asthma. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether clinical asthma control and airway inflammation could be maintained after switching therapy from medium-dose fluticasone propionate (FP) to low-dose FP administered with the long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) salmeterol. METHODS: Eighty-eight subjects (age, > or =18 years) who, during open-label screening, demonstrated improved asthma control after an increase from 100 microg of FP twice daily to 250 microg of FP twice daily were randomized to receive 100/50 microg of FP/salmeterol through a Diskus inhaler (GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC) twice daily or continue 250 microg of FP twice daily through a Diskus inhaler for 24 weeks. Clinical outcomes were monitored, and bronchial biopsy specimens and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were obtained before and after 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between treatments with respect to eosinophils in the bronchial mucosa and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; mucosal mast cells, neutrophils, or CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, or CD25+ T lymphocytes; or concentration of mediators (GM-CSF, IL-8, and eosinophil cationic protein). The 2 treatments were not different with respect to lamina reticularis thickness. Consistent with the airway inflammatory measures, clinical and physiologic measures of asthma control were also similar. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that control of asthma and airway inflammation is maintained over the 24-week treatment period when patients requiring a medium-dose ICS are switched to a lower-dose ICS with a LABA. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A lower-dose ICS with a LABA is effective in controlling inflammation and providing clinical asthma control, confirming current guideline recommendations.     

Safety and application of induced sputum analysis in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND: The value of sputum induction in pediatric asthma lies in its potential to directly and noninvasively assess airway inflammation in children, because bronchoscopy and biopsy carry some risk. The Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) study was designed to evaluate the long-term effects of budesonide and nedocromil compared with placebo in children with mild to moderate asthma across 8 centers. OBJECTIVE: At the Denver CAMP site, we sought to evaluate the safety of sputum induction, to determine differences in airway inflammation between treatment groups by using induced sputum analysis, and to examine correlations between other biomarkers and sputum eosinophils. METHODS: Sputum induction was performed, and exhaled nitric oxide, circulating eosinophil counts, and serum eosinophil cationic protein were obtained at treatment discontinuation and after washout. Spirometry and a methacholine challenge were also performed according to the CAMP protocol. RESULTS: Ninety of 117 children provided an adequate sputum sample for analysis. In 9 subjects (3 nedocromil and 6 placebo), sputum induction resulted in bronchospasm. These subjects had greater disease severity, as measured by a lower median prebronchodilator FEV 1 percentage predicted (85.0% vs 96.0%; P =.024) and FEV 1 /FVC ratio (70.0% vs 79.0%; P =.0008); greater bronchodilator reversibility (16.5% vs 6.8%; P =.004); higher serum IgE (1390.0 vs 495.0 ng/mL; P =.017) and circulating eosinophil count (757.0 vs 282.0/mm 3; P =.04); greater use of prednisone (1.9 vs 0.9 courses per 100 person-years; P =.05); and greater supplemental inhaled steroid doses (85.3 vs 0 mg; P =.016). At treatment discontinuation, budesonide-treated patients had a lower median (1st, 3rd quartile) sputum percentage eosinophil (SPEos) (0.2% [0%, 1.2%] vs 0.8% [0.2%, 4.6%]; P =.03) compared with those treated with placebo; no significant difference was noted between nedocromil- and placebo-treated patients. Higher SPEos at the time of treatment discontinuation was associated with asthma worsening that required rescue prednisone (n = 23) during the washout period compared with patients who remained stable (3.6% [0.4%, 6.4%] vs 0.6% [0.2%, 3.2%] SPEos; P =.023). Finally, greater SPEos was associated with atopy, higher bronchodilator reversibility, lower FEV 1 /FVC ratio, higher exhaled nitric oxide levels, circulating eosinophils, sputum and serum eosinophil cationic protein, more prednisone courses during the treatment period, and greater asthma severity. CONCLUSIONS: Sputum induction is a relatively noninvasive and safe procedure that can provide information on eosinophilic inflammation and treatment response and is also associated with several measures of asthma control. However, this procedure still remains a research tool in asthma because of its requirements for technical expertise.     

Fluticasone propionate hydrofluoroalkane inhalation aerosol in patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) delivered by metered-dose inhalers that contain chlorofluorocarbon propellants are being discontinued because of the harmful effects of chlorofluorocarbon on the ozone layer. Therefore, some metered-dose inhaler products are being reformulated with "ozone-friendly" hydrofluoroalkane propellants. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment with fluticasone propionate hydrofluoroalkane inhalation aerosol, 88, 220, and 440 microg twice daily, vs placebo in patients with asthma receiving an ICS. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 12-week study. RESULTS: Mean morning predose percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second increased by 2.2%, 3.2%, and 4.6% in the fluticasone propionate, 88-, 220-, and 440-microg twice-daily, groups, respectively, compared with an 8.3% decrease for placebo (P < .001 vs placebo for all groups). Secondary pulmonary function end points and asthma symptoms showed similar improvements compared with placebo. Discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy was 50% in the placebo group and 11%, 10%, and 6% in the fluticasone propionate, 88-, 220-, and 440-microg twice-daily, groups, respectively. At week 12, the probability of remaining in the study was 0.89, 0.90, and 0.94 for the fluticasone propionate, 88-, 220-, and 440-microg twice-daily, groups, respectively, vs 0.45 for the placebo group (P < .001 for all). Changes in 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion rates were similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fluticasone propionate hydrofluoroalkane, previously shown to be a clinically suitable alternative to fluticasone propionate chlorofluorocarbon, was effective and well tolerated. The ability to switch from fluticasone propionate chlorofluorocarbon and other chlorofluorocarbon-containing ICSs to fluticasone propionate hydrofluoroalkane without sacrificing asthma control or tolerability will facilitate a smooth transition to this nonchlorofluorocarbon-containing medicinal.     

A randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of treatment with montelukast on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-4, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) in children with asthma

BACKGROUND: Anti-inflammatory properties of leukotriene modifiers and their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness have not been studied in children with asthma. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine the changes in serum levels of inflammatory mediators, clinical efficacy, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness after treatment with montelukast. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 39 children with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma were randomly allocated to receive montelukast or placebo for 6 weeks. Main outcome measures were changes in serum concentrations of soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R), IL-4, and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1); peripheral blood eosinophil count; and eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP). Asthma severity score, FEV(1), and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) for histamine were secondary end points. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, serum concentrations of IL-4, sICAM-1, and ECP and eosinophil blood counts significantly decreased after 6 weeks of treatment with montelukast. Montelukast significantly improved asthma control and FEV(1). Montelukast resulted in within-group significant decrease in levels of serum sIL-2R (611 vs. 483 pg/mL), IL-4 (0.123 vs 0.102 pg/mL), sICAM-1 (280 vs. 244 ng/mL), and ECP (74 vs. 59 microg/mL) and in eosinophil blood counts (349 vs. 310 cells/mm(3)). Mean FEV(1) value changed from 85% of predicted to 95% (P <.001) and for histamine (PC(20)H) from 2.8 mg/mL to 3.8 mg/mL (P <.001) after treatment with montelukast. There was no significant difference between montelukast and placebo recipients in the serum concentrations of sIL-2R and PC(20)H after treatment. CONCLUSION: Montelukast provides clinical benefit to patients with chronic asthma and decreases bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Montelukast caused a statistically significant decrease of serum concentrations in cytokine, ICAM-1, and ECP and peripheral blood eosinophil counts over the 6-week treatment period. This observation raises the possibility that leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast, may have effects on parameters of asthmatic inflammation.     

Effect of montelukast on peripheral airflow obstruction in children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast is a widely used controller agent in childhood asthma. It is modestly effective in reducing symptoms, decreasing the need for rescue albuterol, and improving forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether montelukast therapy improves peripheral airway obstruction as measured by lung volumes, air trapping, airway resistance (Raw), and specific conductance (Sgaw). METHODS: Twenty-one children aged 9 to 18 years with mild-to-moderate asthma were randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to receive montelukast (5 or 10 mg) or matching placebo daily for 8 weeks. Symptoms and albuterol use were recorded twice daily, and exhaled nitric oxide measurement, forced oscillometry, spirometry, and body box plethysmography (before and after beta-agonist use) were performed at randomization and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. Circulating eosinophil counts and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels were obtained at randomization and at 8 weeks. RESULTS: Montelukast-treated patients had lower residual volume (P = .05), residual volume-total lung capacity ratio (P = .04), Raw (P = .02), Sgaw (P = .03), and serum ECP levels (P = .02) at 8 weeks compared with those treated with placebo. There was a trend toward reduced daytime and nighttime albuterol use, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences in FEV1, FEV1-forced vital capacity ratio, exhaled nitric oxide levels, or daytime and nighttime symptom scores between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Montelukast therapy was associated with less air trapping, hyperinflation, and Raw and better Sgaw compared with placebo. Lower serum ECP levels, a surrogate measure of airway inflammation, were associated with improvements in lung function.     

Omalizumab is effective in the long-term control of severe allergic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports show that addition of omalizumab to standard therapy reduces asthma exacerbations and simultaneously decreases use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and rescue medication in patients with allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of omalizumab on long-term disease control in patients with severe allergic asthma. METHODS: The present study concerns the 24-week, double-blind extension phase to a previous 28-week core study in which patients received subcutaneous omalizumab or matching placebo (at least 0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/mL] every 4 weeks) for 16 weeks in addition to their existing ICS therapy (beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP]; steroid-stable phase), followed by a 12-week phase in which controlled attempts were made to gradually reduce ICS therapy (steroid-reduction phase). During the extension phase patients were maintained on randomized treatment (omalizumab or placebo) and the lowest sustainable dose of BDP. The use of other asthma medications was permitted during the extension phase. Investigators were also allowed to switch patients from BDP to other ICS medications if considered necessary. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients (omalizumab, n = 245; placebo, n = 215) entered the extension phase. Overall, omalizumab-treated patients experienced significantly fewer exacerbations vs placebo during the extension phase (0.60 and 0.83 exacerbations per patient, respectively; P = 0.023), despite a sustained significant reduction in their use of ICS (mean BDP equivalent dose: omalizumab, 227 microg/d; placebo, 335 microg/d; P < 0.001). Treatment with omalizumab was well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that omalizumab is effective in the long-term control of severe allergic asthma.     

Airway inflammation assessed by invasive and noninvasive means in severe asthma: eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes

BACKGROUND: Airway inflammation assessed by bronchial biopsies demonstrates distinct eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes in severe asthma, but their relationship to other biomarkers of disease (induced sputum and nitric oxide [NO]) is not clear. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare airway inflammation using noninvasive (induced sputum, exhaled NO), and invasive (bronchial biopsies) methods in moderate and severe asthma and to assess whether induced sputum and exhaled NO would allow the identification of eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes in severe asthma. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 32 subjects with severe asthma and 35 subjects with moderate asthma, from whom we obtained bronchial biopsies, induced sputum, and exhaled NO measurements. RESULTS: Among subjects with severe asthma, we identified eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes using both bronchial biopsies and sputum cell counts. However, the vast majority of subjects with high sputum eosinophil counts did not have high mucosal eosinophil counts. Exhaled NO was increased in the eosinophilic phenotype as judged from bronchial biopsy findings, but not on the basis of induced sputum. Subjects with high sputum eosinophil counts experienced more asthma exacerbations than the subjects with low sputum eosinophil counts. In contrast, we did not find any differences in the clinical characteristics between eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes that were identified by bronchial biopsies. CONCLUSION: The use of sputum cell counts allowed the identification of a subgroup of subjects with severe asthma who were at risk of more frequent asthma exacerbations. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Monitoring sputum eosinophil counts in subjects with severe asthma may allow identifying the subjects with the greatest disease activity.     

Immune response to influenza vaccination in children and adults with asthma: effect of corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND: Annual influenza vaccination is currently recommended as a preventative measure for all patients with asthma. However, the effect of maintenance corticosteroid therapy on the immune response to influenza vaccine has received limited evaluation. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated the effect of corticosteroid therapy on the immune response to influenza vaccine in children and adults with asthma. METHODS: This was a substudy of a larger multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover study investigating the safety of trivalent influenza vaccine in patients with asthma. At baseline, 294 subjects were randomized to receive either placebo first (n=139) or inactivated trivalent split-virus influenza vaccine first (n=155). Study subjects were categorized into 2 groups: subjects in group 1 (n=148) were receiving medium-dose or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) or oral corticosteroids, whereas subjects in group 2 (n=146) were not receiving corticosteroids or were receiving low-dose ICSs. Serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers for the vaccine antigens were measured before and 4 weeks after the administration of placebo or vaccine. RESULTS: Serologic responses to each influenza vaccine antigen were significantly higher in vaccine than in placebo recipients and were similar among influenza vaccine recipients in groups 1 and 2 for the following endpoints: rise in antibody titer, percent of participants who developed a serological response, and percent of subjects who developed a serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titer > or =1:32. Post hoc subgroup analyses demonstrated an attenuated response to influenza B antigen in subjects receiving high-dose ICS compared with subjects who were steroid-na?ve (P<.05). CONCLUSION: The immune response to the A antigens of the inactivated influenza vaccine in subjects with asthma is not adversely affected by ICS therapy. High-dose ICS therapy may diminish the response to the B antigen of the vaccine, an observation that needs further investigation.     

Effect of montelukast on symptoms and exhaled nitric oxide levels in 7- to 14-year-old children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Cysteinyl leukotrienes have been found to exert potent inflammatory effects in the upper airways and play a fundamental role in the pathogenesis of allergic rhinitis. Previous studies have reported increased levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) in patients with allergic rhinitis without asthma symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of treatment with montelukast on symptoms, eNO levels, and peripheral eosinophil counts of children with seasonal allergic rhinitis during pollen season. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study performed between April and June 2005 in 57 children aged 7 to 14 years with seasonal allergic rhinitis was performed. The study comprised a 1-week screening period, a 1-week run-in period, and a 2-week treatment period with once daily montelukast, 5 mg, or matching placebo. RESULTS: No significant difference at baseline was found in symptom scores, eNO levels, and blood eosinophil counts between the treatment and placebo groups. After 2 weeks of montelukast treatment, improvements from the baseline in the daytime nasal, composite, and daytime eye symptoms scores were significantly greater in the montelukast group compared with the placebo group (P < .001, P < .001, and P < .01, respectively). A significant decrease was also found in eosinophil counts (P < .001) in the montelukast group compared with the placebo group after treatment. Montelukast treatment did not produce a significant effect on eNO levels compared with placebo (P = .96). CONCLUSION: Montelukast treatment provided significant improvement in symptoms and peripheral eosinophil counts of school-age children with seasonal allergic rhinitis; however, it did not show a significant effect on eNO levels.     

Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination provides more effective asthma control than low-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus montelukast

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a disease of chronic inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) provide important anti-inflammatory treatment but may not provide optimal control of asthma when taken alone. Two therapeutic alternatives for enhanced asthma control are to substitute the combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (FP/Salm Combo) through the Diskus inhaler or to add montelukast to existing ICS therapy. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and safety of FP/Salm Combo through the Diskus inhaler versus montelukast added to FP (FP + montelukast) in patients whose symptoms were suboptimally controlled with ICS therapy. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, 12-week study in 447 patients with asthma who were symptomatic at baseline while receiving low-dose FP. Patients were treated for 12 weeks with one of the following: (1) combination of FP 100 microg plus salmeterol 50 microg twice daily through the Diskus inhaler, or (2) FP 100 microg twice daily through the Diskus inhaler plus oral montelukast 10 mg once daily. RESULTS: FP/Salm Combo treatment provided better overall asthma control than FP + montelukast with significantly greater improvements in morning peak expiratory flow (+24.9 L/min vs +13.0 L/min, P <.001), evening peak expiratory flow (+18.9 L/min vs +9.6 L/min, P <.001), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (+0.34 L vs +0.20 L, P <.001), as well as a change in the percentage of days with no albuterol use (+26.3% vs +19.1%, P =.032) and the shortness of breath symptom score (-0.56 vs -0.40, P =.017). The groups had comparable improvements in chest tightness, wheeze, and overall symptom scores. Asthma exacerbation rates were significantly lower (P =.031) in the FP/Salm Combo group (4 patients, 2%) than in the FP + montelukast group (13 patients, 6%). Adverse event profiles were comparable. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients on low-dose ICS therapy had significantly greater improvement in asthma control when switched to the FP/Salm Combo than when montelukast was added to ICS therapy.     

Features of severe asthma in school-age children: Atopy and increased exhaled nitric oxide

BACKGROUND: Children with severe asthma have persistent symptoms despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). The differentiating features of severe asthma in children are poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: To identify features of severe versus mild-to-moderate asthma in school-age children using noninvasive assessments of lung function, atopy, and airway inflammation. METHODS: A total of 75 children (median age, 10 years) with asthma underwent baseline characterization including spirometry and lung volume testing, methacholine bronchoprovocation, allergy evaluation, and offline measurement of exhaled nitric oxide (F(ENO)). Twenty-eight were followed longitudinally over 6 months. Participants were assigned to the severe asthma subgroup if they required high-dose ICS plus 2 or more minor criteria. RESULTS: Children with severe versus mild-to-moderate asthma had more symptoms, greater airway obstruction, more gas trapping, and increased bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. Subjects with severe asthma also had higher concentrations of F(ENO) and significantly greater sensitization to aeroallergens. With long-term study, both the reduction in FEV(1) and increase in F(ENO) persisted in the severe versus mild-to-moderate group. Furthermore, despite adjustments in ICS doses, the frequency of exacerbations was significantly higher in subjects with severe (83%) versus mild-to-moderate asthma (43%). CONCLUSION: Severe asthma in childhood is characterized by poor symptom control despite high-dose ICS treatment and can be differentiated from mild-to-moderate asthma by measurement of lung function and F(ENO). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should suspect severe asthma in children with poor response to ICS, airway obstruction, and high F(ENO).     

Relationship between induced sputum cell counts and fluid-phase eosinophil cationic protein and clinical or physiologic profiles in mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: Sputum analysis is the only non-invasive method to examine airway inflammatory processes in subjects with asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between cell counts and fluid phase levels in induced sputum in subjects with mild asthma, and the severity of asthma as assessed by clinical, physiologic and blood measurements. METHODS: Forty patients with mild asthma, aged 17 to 49 years were studied (good sputum sample only from 31). On the first day, spirometry and methacholine challenges were performed. After 2 to 4 days, venous blood for absolute eosinophil count and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) measurement was obtained and sputum was induced by inhalation of hypertonic saline. For the next 15 days subjects recorded their peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom scores, and beta2-agonist requirements twice daily. Differential counts of leukocytes were done on cytospin preparations of homogenized sputum and the supernatant was examined for eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). RESULTS: Sputum eosinophil counts and not neutrophil, epithelial cells, macrophages, or lymphocytes, were inversely correlated to FEV1/FVC % (r = -.57, P = .0008) and to PC20-methacholine (r = -.40, P = .024). No statistical relationship was obtained between eosinophil counts and either symptom scores, bronchodilator requirements, or daily PEF variability. Sputum ECP values were correlated to FEV1/FVC% (r = -.41, P = .026) but not to PC20 (r = -.32, P = .08) or clinical scores or PEF variation. A trend to significance was appreciated between peripheral blood and sputum eosinophil counts (r = .34, P = .067) and no relationship was found between sputum and serum ECP values (r = .10, P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: Although sputum markers give some information about disordered lung function and physiologic changes in the airways, they are not the only factors concerned in the clinical expression of mild asthma.     

Differential effects of maintenance long-acting beta-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid on asthma control and asthma exacerbations

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs)/inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) has become established as effective maintenance treatment for asthma. OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast the efficacy and safety of LABAs/ICSs against different maintenance ICS strategies in adults with asthma. METHODS: Cochrane systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (to April 2004) were identified that compared the addition of LABA to ICS against 3 inhaled corticosteroid strategies: (1) a similar dose (n = 4312 subjects), (2) a higher dose (n = 4951), and (3) a similar dose in steroid-naive subjects (n = 968). The outcomes evaluated were asthma exacerbations, asthma control, and adverse effects. Pediatric studies were excluded. RESULTS: The addition of LABA to ICSs significantly reduced the risk of exacerbations compared with a similar ICS dose, number needed to treat = 18. The effects of LABA/ICSs on exacerbations compared with the other maintenance inhaled corticosteroid strategies were not statistically significant. LABA added to inhaled corticosteroids led to significant improvements in asthma control compared with all 3 maintenance ICS strategies. There was an increased risk of tremor with LABA/ICSs that reached significance for initial therapy, number needed to harm = 21, and compared with higher ICS doses, number needed to harm = 74. CONCLUSION: Maintenance asthma therapy with LABA/ICSs has differential effects on asthma control and asthma exacerbations. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The greatest benefit and least harm of LABAs comes when they are added to a similar ICS dose in adults with symptomatic asthma.     

Anti-inflammatory effect of itraconazole in stable allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) complicates chronic asthma and results from hypersensitivity to the fungus Aspergillus fumigatu s, causing an intense systemic immune response and progressive lung damage. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether treatment with the antifungal agent itraconazole reduced eosinophilic airway inflammation in subjects with ABPA. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed in stable subjects with ABPA (n = 29). Subjects received 400 mg of itraconazole per day (n = 15) or placebo (n = 14) for 16 weeks. All subjects were reviewed monthly with history, spirometry, and sputum induction to measure airway inflammation, serum total IgE and IgG levels to A fumigatu s, and blood eosinophil counts. RESULTS: By using regression analysis in a random-effects model, subjects receiving itraconazole had a decrease in sputum eosinophils of 35% per week, with no decrease seen in the placebo arm (P <.01). Sputum eosinophil cationic protein levels decreased with itraconazole treatment by 42% per week compared with 23% in the placebo group (P <.01). Itraconazole reduced systemic immune activation, leading to a decrease in serum IgE levels (310 IU/mL) compared with levels seen in the placebo group (increase of 18 IU/mL, P <.01) and a decrease in IgG levels to A fumigatu s (15.4 IU/mL) compared with levels seen in the placebo group (increase of 3.7 IU/mL, P =.03). There were fewer exacerbations requiring oral cortico-steroids in those treated with itraconazole compared with in the placebo group (P =.03). CONCLUSION: Itraconazole treatment of subjects with stable ABPA reduces eosinophilic airway inflammation, systemic immune activation, and exacerbations. These results imply that itraconazole is a potential adjunctive treatment for ABPA.