Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer revisited

The axilla has long been a focus of clinicians' attention in the management of breast cancer. The approach to the axilla has undergone dramatic changes over the last century, from radical and extended radical excisions, through the introduction of sentinel node biopsy for node negative patients to the current situation where selective management of those with nodal involvement is being introduced.The introduction of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the 1990's has been key to the major changes that have occurred. In less than 20 years it has moved from a hypothesis to a situation where it is the default approach to almost all clinically node negative patients and is being considered in other situations where axillary clearance was previously considered standard. This article reviews the development and introduction of sentinel node biopsy, its current uncertainties and limitations, and possible future developments.     

Sentinel node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Several studies have explored sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but false negative rates and the loss of pretreatment nodal staging are limitations. Sentinel lymph node biopsy prior to induction chemotherapy may address both. METHODS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in clinically node negative patients prior to initiating chemotherapy. Standard level I/II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed at the time of surgery in those patients who had metastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients had 26 SLNB prior to the initiation of chemotherapy. The SLN was identified in all cases (100%). Twelve patients (48%) were found to be node negative and did not require axillary node dissection after chemotherapy. Of the patients who were SLN positive and underwent completion ALND, residual nodal disease was identified in 60%. There were no surgical complications or delay of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy can avoid the morbidity of ALND without compromising the accuracy of axillary staging. It allows for identification of node positive patients subsequently rendered disease free in the regional nodes, which can assist in planning additional chemotherapy or radiation.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检手术经验总结

【摘要】目的总结早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的手术经验。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年6月在我院乳腺外科行乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结活检手术的78例早期乳腺癌病人的临床资料。结果中位年龄54岁（范围32~75岁）,其中48例（62%）患者为右乳癌,30例（38%）为左乳癌。同时,46例（59%）患者肿物位于外上象限,13例（17%）肿物位于外下象限,11例（14%）位于内上象限,8例（10%）位于内下象限。55例（70%）患者为浸润性导管癌（IDC）,16例（21%）为导管原位癌（DCIS）,5例（6%）为浸润性小叶癌（ILC）,2例（3%）为其他类型浸润性癌。前哨淋巴结检出率为90%（70/78）,其中前哨淋巴结阳性率为34%（24/70）,前哨淋巴结阴性率为66%（46/70）。前哨淋巴结准确率为93%（65/70）,假阴性率为11%（5/46）。中位随访时间为12个月,腋窝淋巴结复发1例,余均未见复发事件。结论当前结果符合文献报道,早期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结活检是一种安全的肿瘤腋窝淋巴结状态评估手段,但需要一定经验的外科医生实施。     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a patient with operable breast cancer

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for a patient with operable breast cancer after undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHOD: Between January 2002 and December 2003, women with primary breast cancer who had a breast tumor measuring larger than 3 cm in unilateral diameter were eligible for NAC. All patients who had completed NAC underwent lymphatic mapping with labeled (99m)Tc phytate on the day before surgery. Sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by a full axillary lymph node (AXLN) dissection (ALND) was performed in all patients. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) were sent for a frozen-section examination. RESULTS: The rate of SLN identification was 71%. Both the sensitivity and negative predictive value of SLNB were 100%. The false negative rate was 0%. When candidates for SLNB were restricted to patients with a breast tumor measuring less than 3 cm and clinically negative nodes after NAC, the rate of SLN identification increased to 93% from 71% while still maintaining the 0% false negative rate. CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy after NAC is therefore considered to be a feasible and accurate method to predict the AXLN status in patients who have a breast tumor measuring less than 3 cm in unilateral diameter and a clinically negative AXLN status at the time of surgery after NAC.     

Sentinel node biopsy in early breast cancer. A review on recent and ongoing randomized trials

IntroductionSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is regarded as the standard procedure for nodal staging in patients with early breast cancer. In the last decade several randomized trials have been evaluating its role and indications.Materials and methodsThis article reviews recent and ongoing randomized trials on SLNB.ResultsFour randomized controlled trials have recently shown evidence that SLNB either alone or followed by radiation therapy is effective for the management in patients with low axillary tumor burden in early breast cancer. Nine randomized controlled trials on SLNB are ongoing: four assessing its role in case of positive sentinel node, three evaluating whether SLNB itself can be omitted when the preoperative nodal imaging is negative, two are studying SLNB in the neoadjuvant setting.Discussion and conclusionSLNB either alone or with axillary radiotherapy has been shown to be non-inferior to complete axillary dissection in terms of local recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival in early breast cancer with minimally metastatic axilla. So far, results from ongoing trials are going to confirm the appropriate treatment in patients with limited axillary nodal involvement, the role and the timing of SLNB within the neoadjuvant setting and to define whether surgery can be avoided in the axilla in early stage breast cancer patients with negative preoperative imaging.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the pediatric population

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has only been recently used for childhood neoplasms.

Methods

We reviewed all patients younger than 19 years who underwent SLNB for 5 years.

Results

Twenty patients were identified (11 male, 9 female). Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed for 10 sarcomas (5 synovial, 3 rhabdomyosarcoma, 1 epitheliod, 1 other); 9 skin neoplasms (4 melanomas, 3 Spitz nevi, 2 melanocytomas); and 1 acinic cell carcinoma. All patients underwent Technetium 99m sulfur microcolloid injection and 4-quadrant subdermal injection with Lymphazurin 1% (Autosuture, Norwalk, Conn). Six patients required either sedation for lymphoscintigraphy. Intraoperative gamma probe was used. Primary lesions were found in lower extremity (n = 8), upper extremity (n = 6), trunk (n = 3), and head and neck (n = 3). The lymphatic basins were inguinal (n = 8), axilla (n = 8), neck (n = 3), and both inguinal and axilla (n = 1). At least one lymph node was identified in each procedure. Of 20 patients, 5 (25%) had metastatic disease (4 skin neoplasms and 1 sarcoma). There were no complications in our series, and all patients are alive with no recurrence at an average follow-up of 2.2 years.

Conclusions

Sentinel lymph node biopsy allows for an accurate biopsy in children. However, some younger patients may require sedation, and it may be more challenging to isolate the sentinel node.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in thick malignant melanoma: A 10-year single unit experience

Between the years 2000-2010, 195 patients were diagnosed with ≥4?mm Breslow thickness malignant melanoma in our unit. Median follow-up was 36.8 months. 49% of patients were male and 51% were female. Median age was 74 years. The commonest melanoma type was nodular (55%). The commonest tumour location was on the extremity (45%). 64% of tumours were ulcerated. Median mitotic rate was 9. Median Breslow thickness was 7?mm 66 patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy. 44 (67%) patients had negative results and the remaining 22 (33%) patients were positive for metastatic melanoma. There was no statistically significant correlation between any of the patient or tumour variables (age, sex, melanoma type, melanoma site, Clark level, Breslow thickness, mitotic rate, ulceration) and sentinel lymph node status. Patients with Breslow thickness melanoma of <6?mm had a significantly better 5-year disease free and overall survival compared with those patients with >6?mm Breslow thickness melanoma (63.5% vs. 32.9%; P?=?0.004 and 73.9% vs. 54.7%; P?=?0.02 respectively). Recurrence rate was 50% in those with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to 23% in those with negative results. Distant recurrence was the commonest in both groups. 5-year disease free survival was 64.1% in the SLNB -ve group and 35.4% in the SLNB +ve group (P?=?0.01). There was no significant difference in overall survival between the SLNB -ve and SLNB +ve groups (70.3% vs. 63.7% respectively; P?=?0.66). We conclude that sentinel lymph node biopsy in our unit has provided no survival benefit in those with thick melanoma over the past 10 years but is an important predictor of recurrence free survival. Breslow thickness remains an important predictor of disease free and overall survival in thick melanoma.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in a patient with ruptured poly implant prothese (PIP) implants: A case report

Introduction

Around 400,000 silicone gel breast implants produced by the French company poly implant prothese (PIP) were used worldwide. Following revelations that the company were using non- medical grade silicone for the production of their implants there has been growing concern over the increased rupture rate of these implants and the implications this may have on patients.

Presentation of Case

We report the case of a 57-year old lady with ruptured bilateral cosmetic PIP breast implants in whom a right breast lesion was detected on screening mammograms. Biopsies demonstrated a grade 1 tubular carcinoma. Histology from the sentinel lymph node biopsy showed axillary silicone granulomas but no evidence of metastatic disease.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case to describe SLNB in the presence of ruptured PIP implants, although SLNB in ruptured non-PIP implants has been previously described.

Conclusion

We conclude that SLNB can be utilised even in the context of concurrent PIP implant rupture and the presence of silicone granulomas in the axillary lymph nodes.     

Sentinel node biopsy versus low axillary sampling in women with clinically node negative operable breast cancer

BackgroundSentinel node biopsy (SNB) was initially conceived as excision of the first station axillary lymph node(s) (LN) identified by radioactive and/or blue dye uptake. The definition was subsequently enlarged to also include palpable lymph nodes in the vicinity of sentinel node(s) (SN). We reasoned that the excision of this combination of nodes might be best achieved by sampling the lower axilla.MethodsEach patient underwent low axillary sampling (LAS) and identification of SN in the excised specimen followed by complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). LAS was defined as excision of all fibrofatty tissue overlying the second digitation of serratus anterior below the intercostobrachial nerve and was carried out following a pre-operative injection of radioactive colloid and an intra-operative injection of blue dye. Blue and/or hot nodes (B&/HN) in the dissected tissue and remaining axilla, along with any palpable nodes within the sampled tissue, were defined as SN. The primary endpoint of the study was to compare false negative rates (FNR) of SN with that of LAS in predicting axillary LN status (NCT00128362).FindingsThe study was performed between March 2004 and December 2011 in 478 women with clinically node negative axilla. On histopathological evaluation the median tumor size was 2.5 cm and axillary nodal metastases were found in 34.1% of patients. The FNR of SNB (12.7%, 95% CI 8.1–19.4) and LAS (10.5%, 95% CI 6.6–16.2) were not significantly different (p = 0.56). The FNR of B&/HN alone, without palpable nodes, (29.0%, 95% CI 22.5–36.6) was significantly inferior to those of SNB (p = 0.0007) and LAS (p = 0.0003).InterpretationLAS is as accurate as SNB in predicting axillary LN status in women with clinically node negative operable breast cancer. Confining SNB procedure to excision of B&/HN, significantly increases the risk of leaving behind metastatic lymph nodes in the axilla. LAS is an effective and low cost procedure that minimizes axillary surgery and can be implemented widely.Registry Name: Clinicaltrials.gov.Registration Number: NCT00128362.     

A critique of the sentinel node concept

The concept of "the sentinel node" is false. In the axilla, the lymphatic system usually first drains into a group of low axillary nodes (level 1). The validity, as a staging procedure, of a 4 node axillary sample was demonstrated 30 years ago by Prof. Sir Patrick Forrest. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) should not become the standard of care for all breast cancer patients. All the various options (axillary sampling, SNB, axillary dissection or simply a watchful attitude) are acceptable and to be advised according to the patient's wishes and conditions and to the tumour characteristics. We would also propose the change of the terminology from SNB to "guided axilary sampling" (GAS).     

The development of a supraregional network for the management of penile cancer

INTRODUCTION

Although its incidence is increasing, penile cancer remains a rare disease in the UK. In view of this low volume, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence recommended that treatment is centralised in a limited number of centres arranged as supraregionai networks. The aim of this centralisation is to allow the best standardised treatment for the primary tumours and nodal disease, thereby avoiding under or overtreatment. In this paper we review the formation and functioning of our network in the East Midlands.

METHODS

Data were collected up to August 2010 from our prospective penile network database since its inception in 2005. These data were analysed to see our workload, patterns of referral and surgeries performed over this time period.

RESULTS

The structure and function of the East Midlands network are described. There has been an increase in the number of cases discussed since its formation. There has also been a trend towards more conservative surgery, both of the primary tumour and of nodal management. Between September 2009 and August 2010, 16 glansectomies were performed versus 5 total and 9 partial penectomies. The same period saw 18 dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsies against 7 bilateral and 3 unilateral superficial groin dissections. There was a very high patient satisfaction rate, with patients feeling they had good support and information.

CONCLUSIONS

On reviewing the literature it can be clearly seen that supraregionai networks have led to a decrease in overtreatment and better recognition of the need to manage lymph node status optimally. Our network has demonstrated the trend toward conservative surgery and sentinel node biopsy. The formation of supraregionai networks with a multidisciplinary approach will facilitate high volume centres that will offer optimal surgical therapy and also allow recruitment into studies and new chemotherapeutic regimens. It will also allow better data collection to aid clinical studies that hopefully will also demonstrate better outcomes.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by delayed mastectomy and reconstruction

BACKGROUND: The role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy with total mastectomy is evolving. In patients who desire mastectomy with immediate reconstruction, the final pathologic results of the SLN may create unique problems. Specifically, if the SLN is found to be positive on final pathology, the reconstructed patient would generally require a potentially difficult re-operation on the remaining axillary nodes. The purpose of this study was to review the results of patients who underwent an initial SNL biopsy followed by a planned mastectomy and reconstruction. METHODS: A chart review of patients who underwent staged SLN biopsy with subsequent definitive procedure between 1997 and 2001 was conducted. These were evaluated with regard to type of tumor, status of sentinel node, and design of subsequent operation. RESULTS: There were 40 patients who underwent an initial SLN biopsy followed by a staged mastectomy with reconstruction. Tumors included high-grade carcinoma in situ (n = 4), infiltrating ductal carcinoma (n = 28), invasive lobular carcinoma (n = 4), mucinous carcinoma (n = 1), adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 1), and mixed ductal and lobular carcinoma (n = 2). Tissue biopsy was obtained by either open (n = 9) or needle (n = 31) technique. Twenty-five patients had a negative SLN biopsy and a delayed total mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Positive SLNs were identified in 15 patients (37%). Eight patients had macroscopic nodal metastases and underwent a delayed modified radical mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Seven patients had microscopic nodal metastases and 3 declined further axillary dissection. They proceeded with total mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a substantial proportion of patients treated with SLN biopsy, simple mastectomy, and reconstruction will have positive sentinel lymph nodes. Thus, the ideal approach for patients who wish to have reconstruction should involve an initial SLN biopsy as a separate procedure. If the SLN is benign, the patient may undergo a total mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. However, a patient with a positive SLN may proceed to a modified radical mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. This treatment algorithm eliminates a potentially difficult reoperation on the axilla following reconstruction.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma and other melanocytic tumors in adolescents

Background/Purpose

Melanoma is rare, accounting for only 1% of all pediatric malignancies. The management of pediatric melanoma is controversial but largely parallels that of an adult occurrence. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBX) has become a standard of care for adults with melanoma, but the role of this procedure in the staging of pediatric patients remains to be established. The goal of this study was to determine outcomes and complications of children and adolescent patients undergoing SLNBX at the authors' institution.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients younger than 21 years (N = 20) undergoing SLNBX for melanoma or other melanocytic skin lesions at the University of Colorado Health Science Center between 1996 and 2003 was conducted.

Results

Sentinel lymph node biopsy was successful in all 20 patients, and 8 patients (40%) were found to have metastases within the sentinel node. As in adults, the sentinel node status correlates with primary tumor depth. No complications occurred in patients undergoing SLNBX, but 4 clinically significant complications (57%) occurred in the 7 patients undergoing a completion lymph node dissection. At 33 months median follow-up, all patients were disease free.

Conclusions

Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be successfully and safely performed in pediatric patients for melanoma and atypical nevi. However, the prognostic information and therapeutic implications of SLNBX results for children and adolescents remain unclear. Completion lymph node dissection for microscopic disease is a morbid procedure with uncertain benefit to pediatric or adult patients with a positive SLNBX result. Long-term follow-up data are needed before SLNBX can become a standard of care in pediatric melanoma or as a diagnostic tool to distinguish the atypical Spitz nevus from melanoma.     

乳腺癌新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检的初步研究

目的研究乳腺癌新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检（SLNB）的可行性和效果。方法利用新型示踪剂——^99mTc-利妥昔配合专利蓝染料对60例原发性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后病例进行SLNB，并对SLN进行常规病理检查和免疫组织化学检查。SLNB后常规腋窝淋巴结清扫。结果SLN检测成功率95％（57／60）。SLN转移阳性23例（40％），其中18例为常规病理检查转移阳性（78％），5例为免疫组织化学检出的微转移（22％）。23例SLN有转移病例中，9例同时存在其他腋窝淋巴结转移，另外14例为惟一转移淋巴结。1例SLN转移假阴性。灵敏度96％（23／24），准确性98％（56／57），特异度100％（33／33），假阴性率4．3％（1／23），阴性预测值97％（36／37），阳性预测值100％（24／24）。内乳淋巴结显像11例，活检病理检查均为转移阴性。结论同位素示踪剂和蓝染料联合检测方法对原发性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后进行SLNB同样适用，内乳前哨淋巴结活检不应做常规推荐。     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed under local anesthesia is feasible

BACKGROUND: A sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer patients, performed under local anesthesia (LA), could have advantages such as more efficient use of operating room time and pathologist time. It also provides a histologic diagnosis before definitive breast surgery is undertaken. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility by comparing the results of SLN procedures performed under LA versus general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: The SLN procedure was performed in 50 consecutive outpatients and 167 inpatients with clinical T1-2N0 breast cancer while they were under LA and GA, respectively. The SLN detection rate, a comparison of mapped and harvested SLNs, was compared for both groups. The duration of the SLN biopsies performed under LA was also measured. RESULTS: For both groups a median of 2 SLNs/patient were harvested. The detection rate was 1.00 for the LA group and 0.99 for the GA group. The learning curve for SLN procedures under LA showed a decrease in duration for the consecutive months (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: SLN biopsy can be safely and adequately performed with the patient under LA. It allows early diagnosis of the lymph node status, acquired on an outpatient basis, with minimal discomfort to the patient. The learning curve demonstrated that the LA procedure can quickly be mastered if the surgeon is experienced in performing SLN biopsies.     

Regional recurrence in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy

Background

The incidence of all-location regional recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy is not well documented. This study attempts to identify risk factors.

Methods

A prospectively maintained database was queried to identify patients with a regional recurrence of breast cancer after a first operation for invasive unilateral breast cancer. Patients with regional recurrence were compared with those alive and disease free at 5 years.

Results

Twenty-one of 1,060 patients (2%) experienced a regional recurrence. Most patients (95%) underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy as their axillary staging. Those with regional recurrences had larger tumors (P < .001), higher stage disease (P < .001), more estrogen receptor– and triple-negative breast cancers (P < .001), and more positive lymph nodes (P = .007). Mastectomy (P = .001) and receipt of neoadjuvant and/or chemotherapy (P < .001) were more common among those with regional recurrences.

Conclusions

Regional recurrence of breast cancer occurs infrequently. Risk factors include high-risk cancers, higher stage at presentation, nodal involvement, and need for therapies reflecting higher risk biology.     

Diminishing morbidity with the increased use of sentinel node biopsy in breast carcinoma

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has largely replaced axillary node dissection in the staging of women with clinically negative axillas. The aim of this study was to compare the morbidity of sentinel node biopsy only, sentinel node biopsy followed by axillary dissection, and axillary node dissection only.

Methods

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary lymph node dissection, or both between June 1996 and August 2008 was performed. The incidence of postoperative complications, including arm cellulitis, diminished shoulder range of motion, axillary hematoma, intercostal brachial nerve injury, pulmonary embolus or deep-vein thrombosis, lymphocele requiring aspiration, wound dehiscence, and wound infection, was compared among the 3 groups using Fisher's exact test.

Results

Of the 6,847 axillary operations performed, 2,745 (40%) were sentinel node biopsy only, 1,825 (27%) were sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by completion axillary dissection, and 2,277 (33%) were axillary dissection only. The mean node retrieval was 2 for sentinel node biopsy, 13 for sentinel node biopsy and completion axillary dissection, and 14 for axillary dissection. The mean age was 58 years. The overall complication rate was higher during the first half of the study period than during the second half (9.9% vs 3.9%, P < .0001). Axillary dissection had the highest overall complication rate (11.1%), followed by sentinel node biopsy and completion axillary dissection (7.3%), followed by sentinel node biopsy alone (2.6%) (P < .0001). Significantly less shoulder range of motion limitation, axillary hematoma, and lymphocele requiring aspiration were seen after sentinel node biopsy alone than after sentinel node biopsy plus completion axillary dissection or axillary dissection alone (P < .0001). Wound infection was also significantly less common after sentinel node biopsy than after axillary dissection (P = .02). No difference was seen in incidence of postoperative pulmonary embolus or deep-vein thrombosis, arm cellulitis, intercostal brachial nerve injury, or wound dehiscence.

Conclusions

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is less morbid than sentinel node biopsy followed by completion axillary dissection and axillary node dissection alone. The morbidity of axillary surgery has decreased over time.     

乳腺癌新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检术的研究

目的 探讨乳腺癌病人新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检的可行性。方法对2003年11月至2004年10月住院治疗中的57例Ⅱ、Ⅲ期乳腺癌病人行新辅助化疗后，临床检查腋窝淋巴结阴性行前哨淋巴结活检术（SLNB）。结果57例中检出前哨淋巴结（SLN）53例，检出率93．0％。SLN对腋窝淋巴结状况预测的敏感性为89．7％，特异性为100．0％，准确性为94．3％，阳性预测值为100．0％，阴性预测值为88．9％，假阴性率为5．7％。肿瘤对化疗反应为CR（完全缓解）、PR（部分缓解）和SD（稳定）的SLN检出率分别为100．0％、96．7％和70．0％（P〈0．01）。SLN假阴性3例均为腋窝淋巴结转移数〉4个者。结论Ⅱ、Ⅲ期乳腺癌实施新辅助化疗后。行SLNB可获得与早期乳腺癌SLNB相似的效果。