Validation of Adult Relative Radiation Levels Using the ACR Dose Index Registry: Report of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Radiation Exposure Subcommittee

The ACR Dose Index Registry (DIR) provides a new source of clinical radiation exposure data that has not been used previously to establish or update the relative radiation level (RRL) values in the ACR Appropriateness Criteria (AC). The results of a recent review of DIR data for 10 common CT examinations were compared with current ACR AC RRL values for the same procedures. The AC RRL values were previously determined by consensus of members of the AC Radiation Exposure Subcommittee based on reference radiation dose values from the literature (when available) and anecdotal information from individual members’ clinical practices and experiences. For 7 of the 10 examination types reviewed, DIR data agreed with existing RRL values. For 3 of 10 examination types, DIR data reflected lower dose values than currently rated in the AC. The Radiation Exposure Subcommittee will revise these RRL assignments in a forthcoming update to the AC (in October 2018) and will continue to monitor the DIR and associated reviews and analyses to refine RRL assignments for additional examination types. Given recent attention and efforts to reduce radiation exposure in CT and other imaging modalities, it is likely that other examination types will require revision of RRL assignments once information from the DIR database is considered.     

Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis: Radiation Dose Considerations

Dual-energy CT offers several new applications and opportunities for routine clinical practice. Increasing utilization in the context of both routine practice and clinical research raises questions about expected radiation dose when compared with conventional single-energy exams. Despite initial concerns, advanced iterative reconstruction techniques and creation of virtual unenhanced images in multiphase acquisitions offer methods for dose reduction. Although dose varies across patients and scanners, modern dual-energy exams allow for comparable and potentially decreased radiation dose when compared with single-energy CT. In this review, we examine dual-energy radiation dose considerations with discussion of accepted ACR diagnostic reference levels.     

The American College of Radiology Fluoroscopy Dose Index Registry Pilot: Technical Considerations and Dosimetric Performance of the Interventional Fluoroscopes

PurposeTo characterize the accuracy and consistency of fluoroscope dose index reporting and report rates of occupational radiation safety hardware availability and use, trainee participation in procedures, and optional hardware availability at pilot sites for the American College of Radiology (ACR) Fluoroscopy Dose Index Registry (DIR).Materials and MethodsNine institutions participated in the registry pilot, providing fluoroscopic technical and clinical practice data from 38 angiographic C-arm–type fluoroscopes. These data included measurements of the procedure table and mattress transmission factors and accuracy measurements of the reference-point air kerma (K_a,r) and air kerma–area product (P_KA). The accuracy of the radiation dose indices were analyzed for variation over time by 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Sites also self-reported information on availability and use of radiation safety hardware, hardware configuration of fluoroscopes, and trainee participation in procedures.ResultsAll K_a,r and P_KA measurements were within the ±35% regulatory limit on accuracy. The mean absolute difference between correction factors for a given system in fluoroscopic and acquisition mode was 0.03 (95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.03). For the 28 fluoroscopic imaging planes that provided data for 3 time points, ANOVA yielded an F value of 0.134 with an F-critical value of 3.109 (P = .875).ConclusionsThis publication provides the technical and clinical framework pertaining to the ACR Fluoroscopy DIR pilot and offers necessary context for future analysis of the clinical procedure radiation-dose data collected.     

CT Radiation Dose Optimization and Estimation: an Update for Radiologists

In keeping with the increasing utilization of CT examinations, the greater concern about radiation hazards from examinations has been addressed. In this regard, CT radiation dose optimization has been given a great deal of attention by radiologists, referring physicians, technologists, and physicists. Dose-saving strategies are continuously evolving in terms of imaging techniques as well as dose management. Consequently, regular updates of this issue are necessary especially for radiologists who play a pivotal role in this activity. This review article will provide an update on how we can optimize CT dose in order to maximize the benefit-to-risk ratio of this clinically useful diagnostic imaging method.     

Meeting The Joint Commission’s Dose Incident Identification and External Benchmarking Requirements Using the ACR’s Dose Index Registry

PurposeThe purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the potential of using the ACR’s Dose Index Registry^® to meet The Joint Commission’s requirements to identify incidents in which the radiation dose index from diagnostic CT examinations exceeded the protocol’s expected dose index range.MethodsIn total, 10,970 records in the Dose Index Registry were statistically analyzed to establish both an upper and lower expected dose index for each protocol. All 2015 studies to date were then retrospectively reviewed to identify examinations whose total examination dose index exceeded the protocol’s defined upper threshold. Each dose incident was then logged and reviewed per the new Joint Commission requirements.ConclusionsFacilities may leverage their participation in the ACR’s Dose Index Registry to fully meet The Joint Commission's dose incident identification review and external benchmarking requirements.     

Reducing Variability of Radiation Dose in CT: The New Frontier in Patient Safety

PurposeAlthough reducing radiation dose in CT examinations is an important goal, also important in the management of radiation dose is ensuring consistency of dose administered for a given type of examination. We have implemented an approach to reducing variance in CT radiation dose by standardizing protocols and implementing software that decreases variance.MethodsA multifaceted approach to reducing variance in CT radiation dose was utilized: (1) establishment of the Radiation Dose Optimization Committee, (2) standardization of protocols, and (3) implementation of scanner software. Two periods of data were collected: pre-intervention (January 1, 2013, to July 31, 2014) and postintervention (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016). The period from August 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015, represented the time the major interventions were performed.ResultsThe average radiation dose for all CT exams performed during the pre-intervention period (n = 39,314) was 22.3 CTDIvol with an SD of 17.0. The average radiation dose for all CT exams performed during the postintervention period (n = 49,863) was 13.6 CTDIvol with an SD of 9.01. The postintervention variance was significantly decreased (P < .0001).ConclusionsA significant decrease in the variability of our network CT radiation dose was achieved as a result of a combination of standardizing protocols across the network and implementation of advanced software that effectively managed radiation dose, all overseen by the Radiation Dose Optimization Committee.     

Patient Radiation Doses in IR Procedures: The American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy Pilot

PurposeTo update normative data on fluoroscopy dose indices in the United States for the first time since the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology study in the late 1990s.Materials and MethodsThe Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy pilot study collected data from March 2018 through December 2019, with 50 fluoroscopes from 10 sites submitting data. Primary radiation dose indices including fluoroscopy time (FT), cumulative air kerma (K_a,r), and kerma area product (P_KA) were collected for interventional radiology fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) procedures. Clinical facility procedure names were mapped to the American College of Radiology (ACR) common procedure lexicon. Distribution parameters including the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th, and 99th percentiles were computed.ResultsDose indices were collected for 70,377 FGI procedures, with 50,501 ultimately eligible for analysis. Distribution parameters are reported for 100 ACR Common IDs. FT in minutes, K_a,r in mGy, and P_KA in Gy-cm² are reported in this study as (n; median) for select ACR Common IDs: inferior vena cava filter insertion (1,726; FT: 2.9; K_a,r: 55.8; P_KA: 14.19); inferior vena cava filter removal (464; FT: 5.7; K_a,r: 178.6; P_KA: 34.73); nephrostomy placement (2,037; FT: 4.1; K_a,r: 39.2; P_KA: 6.61); percutaneous biliary drainage (952; FT: 12.4; K_a,r: 160.5; P_KA: 21.32); gastrostomy placement (1,643; FT: 3.2; K_a,r: 29.1; P_KA: 7.29); and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement (327; FT: 34.8; K_a,r: 813.0; P_KA: 181.47).ConclusionsThe ACR DIR-Fluoro pilot has provided state-of-the-practice statistics for radiation dose indices from IR FGI procedures. These data can be used to prioritize procedures for radiation optimization, as demonstrated in this work.     

RADIANCE: An automated, enterprise-wide solution for archiving and reporting CT radiation dose estimates

There is growing interest in the ability to monitor, track, and report exposure to radiation from medical imaging. Historically, however, dose information has been stored on an image-based dose sheet, an arrangement that precludes widespread indexing. Although scanner manufacturers are beginning to include dose-related parameters in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers of imaging studies, there remains a vast repository of retrospective computed tomographic (CT) data with image-based dose sheets. Consequently, it is difficult for imaging centers to monitor their dose estimates or participate in the American College of Radiology (ACR) Dose Index Registry. An automated extraction software pipeline known as Radiation Dose Intelligent Analytics for CT Examinations (RADIANCE) has been designed that quickly and accurately parses CT dose sheets to extract and archive dose-related parameters. Optical character recognition of information in the dose sheet leads to creation of a text file, which along with the DICOM study header is parsed to extract dose-related data. The data are then stored in a relational database that can be queried for dose monitoring and report creation. RADIANCE allows efficient dose analysis of CT examinations and more effective education of technologists, radiologists, and referring physicians regarding patient exposure to radiation at CT. RADIANCE also allows compliance with the ACR's dose reporting guidelines and greater awareness of patient radiation dose, ultimately resulting in improved patient care and treatment.     

SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT

Over the last few years, computed tomography (CT) has developed into a standard clinical test for a variety of cardiovascular conditions. The emergence of cardiovascular CT during a period of dramatic increase in radiation exposure to the population from medical procedures and heightened concern about the subsequent potential cancer risk has led to intense scrutiny of the radiation burden of this new technique. This has hastened the development and implementation of dose reduction tools and prompted closer monitoring of patient dose. In an effort to aid the cardiovascular CT community in incorporating patient-centered radiation dose optimization and monitoring strategies into standard practice, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography has produced a guideline document to review available data and provide recommendations regarding interpretation of radiation dose indices and predictors of risk, appropriate use of scanner acquisition modes and settings, development of algorithms for dose optimization, and establishment of procedures for dose monitoring.     

Strategies for Dose Optimization: Views From Health Care Systems

BackgroundAdvances in CT have facilitated widespread use of medical imaging while increasing patient lifetime exposure to ionizing radiation.PurposeTo describe dose optimization strategies used by health care organizations to optimize radiation dose and image quality.Materials and methodsA qualitative study of semistructured interviews conducted with 26 leaders from 19 health care systems in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Interviews focused on strategies that were used to optimize radiation dose at the organizational level. A directed content analysis approach was used in data analysis.ResultsAnalysis identified seven organizational strategies used by these leaders for optimizing CT dose: (1) engaging radiologists and technologists, (2) establishing a CT dose committee, (3) managing organizational change, (4) providing leadership and support, (5) monitoring and benchmarking, (6) modifying CT protocols, and (7) changes in equipment and work rules.ConclusionsLeaders in these health systems engaged in specific strategies to optimize CT dose within their organizations. The strategies address challenges health systems encounter in optimizing CT dose at the organizational level and offer an evolving framework for consideration in dose optimization efforts for enhancing safety and use of medical imaging.     

Dose reduction during CT scanning in an anthropomorphic phantom by the use of a male gonad shield.

Shielding the radiosensitive gonads during X-ray exposure has been advocated for plain film radiography for many years. In the UK, gonad shields are not widely employed in routine CT scanning, possibly owing to a perceived difficulty in protecting the gonads from a multidirectional X-ray source. The increasing numbers of CT scanners in the UK, with the large doses they deliver to patients, make potential dose reduction methods an important issue. This study measures the dose reduction achievable by shielding the male gonads with a lead wrap-around protection device. The reductions in dose when shielded both from direct radiation and from indirect radiation scattered from local tissues were studied. The use of the device resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the absorbed testicular dose from both direct and scattered radiation, with no increase in the dose measured in surrounding tissues. In three clinically relevant experimental protocols where the testes were not irradiated directly, the testicular absorbed dose from indirect scatter was reduced by 77-93% of the corresponding non-shielded figure. In these three experiments, image quality was unaltered by the use of the shield. A larger dose reduction was obtained when the shield was used to protect the testes from direct irradiation. However, this was achieved at the expense of considerable image degradation from streak artefact that would effectively prevent the clinical use of the device in this setting.     

Potential impact of the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria on CT for trauma

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to identify the current imaging utilization patterns at a level 1 trauma center, the radiation dose and financial costs of this imaging, and what impact, if any, the American College of Radiology (ACR) appropriateness criteria might have on these factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred trauma patients were retrospectively chosen for inclusion in the study. Patients were selected on the basis of receiving any form of ionizing radiation within the first 3 hr of arrival at an academic level 1 trauma center. Exclusion criteria included an absence of imaging, patients transferred from outside institutions with previously acquired imaging studies, and patients who first underwent surgery and subsequently returned for imaging within the 3-hr inclusion time of the study. These data were then analyzed for imaging utilization practices, estimation of radiation dose, cost, and the impact of the ACR criteria on these factors. RESULTS: A total of 660 CT examinations were performed for a total charge of $837,028. An estimated effective dose of 16 mSv was sustained by the typical patient in the study. Overall, application of the ACR criteria was found to have the potential to reduce imaging costs by 39% and the estimated radiation dose by 44%. CONCLUSION: The ACR appropriateness criteria have the potential to have a strong positive impact on the overall cost of imaging and radiation dose received for patients in the setting of trauma. These criteria should be emphasized to clinicians to help guide their imaging decisions.     

Chest CT for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Esophageal Foreign Bodies

Foreign body ingestion is a common problem in children. Radiography is the mainstay of imaging, but many radiolucent items go undetected without further imaging by fluoroscopic esophagram. While studies in adults support the use of computed tomography (CT) for esophageal foreign body ingestion, CT has historically not been used in children given the typically higher radiation doses on CT compared with fluoroscopy. In distinction to an esophagram, CT does not require oral contrast nor presence of an onsite radiologist and can be interpreted remotely. At our institution, a dedicated CT protocol has been used for airway foreign bodies since 2015. Given the advantages of CT over esophagram, we retrospectively reviewed institutional radiation dose data from 2017 to 2020 for esophagrams, airway foreign body CT (FB-CT), and routine CT Chest to compare effective doses for each modality. For ages 1+ years, effective dose was lowest using the FB-CT protocol; esophagram mean dose showed the most variability, and was over double the dose of FB-CT for ages 5+ years. Routine CT chest doses were uniformly highest across all age ranges. Given these findings, we instituted a CT foreign body imaging protocol as the first-line imaging modality for radiolucent esophageal foreign body at our institution.     

Dose reduction technique in diagnostic X-ray computed tomography by use of 6-channel multileaf collimators

Recently, region-setting computed tomography (CT) has been studied as a region of interest imaging method. This technique can strongly reduce the radiation dose by limiting the irradiation field. Although mathematical studies have been performed for reduction of the truncation artifact, no experimental studies have been performed so far. In this study, we developed a three-dimensional region-setting CT system and evaluated its imaging properties. As an experimental system, we developed an X-ray CT system with multileaf collimators. In this system, truncated projection data can be captured by limiting of the radiation field. In addition, a truncated projection data correction was performed. Finally, image reconstruction was performed by use of the Feldkamp–Davis–Kress algorithm. In the experiments, the line profiles and the image quality of the reconstructed images were evaluated. The results suggested that the image quality of the proposed method is comparable to that of the original method. Furthermore, we confirmed that the radiation dose was reduced when this system was used. These results indicate that a 3D region-setting CT system using 6-channel multileaf collimators can reduce the radiation dose without in causing a degradation of image quality.     

CT Fluoroscopy for Image-Guided Procedures: Physician Radiation Dose During Full-Rotation and Partial-Angle CT Scanning

PurposeTo determine physician radiation exposure when using partial-angle computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy (PACT) vs conventional full-rotation CT and whether there is an optimal tube/detector position at which physician dose is minimized.Materials and MethodsPhysician radiation dose (entrance air kerma) was measured for full-rotation CT (360°) and PACT (240°) at all tube/detector positions using a human-mimicking phantom placed in a 64-channel multidetector CT. Parameters included 120 kV, 20- and 40-mm collimation, and 100 mA. The mean, standard deviation, and increase/decrease in physician dose compared with a full-rotation scan were reported.ResultsPhysician radiation exposure during CT fluoroscopy with PACT was highly dependent on the position of the tube/detector during scanning. The lowest PACT physician dose was when the physician was on the detector side (center view angle 116°; ?35% decreased dose vs full-angle CT). The highest PACT physician dose was with the physician on the tube side (center view angle 298°; +34% increased dose vs full-angle CT), all doses P <.05 vs full-rotation CT.ConclusionsPartial-angle CT has the potential to both significantly increase or decrease physician radiation dose during CT fluoroscopy-guided procedures. The detector/tube position has a profound effect on physician dose. The lowest dose during PACT was achieved when the physician was located on the detector side (ie, distant from the tube). This data could be used to optimize CT fluoroscopy parameters to reduce physician radiation exposure for PACT-capable scanners.     

Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization

Recent technologic advances have markedly enhanced the clinical applications of computed tomography (CT). While the benefits of CT exceed the harmful effects of radiation exposure in patients, increasing radiation doses to the population have raised a compelling case for reduction of radiation exposure from CT. Strategies for radiation dose reduction are difficult to devise, however, because of a lack of guidelines regarding CT examination and scanning techniques. Various methods and strategies based on individual patient attributes and CT technology have been explored for dose optimization. It is the purpose of this review article to outline basic principles of CT radiation exposure and emphasize the need for CT radiation dose optimization based on modification of scanning parameters and application of recent technologic innovations.     

Tracking and Resolving CT Dose Metric Outliers Using Root-Cause Analysis

PurposeThe aim of this study was to examine the frequency and type of outlier dose metrics for three common CT examination types on the basis of a root-cause analysis (RCA) approach.MethodsInstitutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective observational study. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Between January 2010 and December 2013, radiation dose metric data from 34,615 CT examinations, including 26,878 routine noncontrast CT head, 2,992 CT pulmonary angiographic (CTPA), and 4,745 renal colic examinations, were extracted from a radiation dose index monitoring database and manually cleaned. Dose outliers were identified on the basis of the statistical distribution of volumetric CT dose index and dose-length product for each examination type; values higher than the 99th percentile and less than the 1st percentile were flagged for RCA.ResultsThere were 397 noncontrast CT head, 52 CTPA, and 80 renal colic outliers. Root causes for high-outlier examinations included repeat examinations due to patient motion (n = 122 [31%]), modified protocols mislabeled as “routine” (n = 69 [18%]), higher dose examinations for patients with large body habitus (n = 27 [7%]), repeat examinations due to technical artifacts (n = 20 [5%]), and repeat examinations due to suboptimal contrast timing (CTPA examinations) (n = 18 [5%]). Root causes for low-outlier examinations included low-dose protocols (n = 112 [29%]) and aborted examinations (n = 8 [2%]). On the basis of examination frequency over a 3-month period, the 90th and 10th percentile values were set in the radiation dose index monitoring database as thresholds for sending notifications to staff members responsible for outlier investigations.ConclusionsSystematic RCA of dose outliers identifies sources of variation and dose excess and pinpoints specific protocol and technical shortcomings for corrective action.     

Radiation dose-reduction strategies for neuroradiology CT protocols

Within the past 2 decades, the number of CT examinations performed has increased almost 10-fold. This is in large part due to advances in multidetector-row CT technology, which now allows faster image acquisition and improved isotropic imaging. The increased use, along with multidetector technique, has led to a significantly increased radiation dose to the patient from CT studies. This places increased responsibility on the radiologist to ensure that CT examinations are indicated and that the "as low as reasonably achievable" concept is adhered to. Neuroradiologists are familiar with factors that affect patient dose such as pitch, milliamperes, kilovolt peak (kVp), collimation, but with increasing attention being given to dose reduction, they are looking for additional ways to further reduce the radiation associated with their CT protocols. In response to increasing concern, CT manufacturers have developed dose-reduction tools, such as dose modulation, in which the tube current is adjusted along with the CT acquisition, according to patient's attenuation. This review will describe the available techniques for reducing dose associated with neuroradiologic CT imaging protocols.     

Patient dose simulation in X-ray CT using a radiation treatment-planning system

Medical irradiation dosage has been increasing with the development of new radiological equipment and new techniques like interventional radiology. It is fair to say that patient dose has been increased as a result of the development of multi-slice CT. A number of studies on the irradiation dose of CT have been reported, and the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) is now used as a general means of determining CT dose. However, patient dose distribution in the body varies with the patient's constitution, bowel gas in the body, and conditions of exposure. In this study, patient dose was analyzed from the viewpoint of dose distribution, using a radiation treatment-planning computer. Percent depth dose (PDD) and the off-center ratio (OCR) of the CT beam are needed to calculate dose distribution by the planning computer. Therefore, X-ray CT data were measured with various apparatuses, and beam data were sent to the planning computer. Measurement and simulation doses in the elliptical phantom (Mix-Dp: water equivalent material) were collated, and the CT irradiation dose was determined for patient dose simulation. The rotational radiation treatment technique was used to obtain the patient dose distribution of CT, and patient dose was evaluated through simulation of the dose distribution. CT images of the thorax were sent to the planning computer and simulated. The result was that the patient dose distribution of the thorax was obtained for CT examination.     

Advanced computed tomography technology and patient dose: a literature review

Cumulative patient radiation dose is a hot topic making headlines today. Responsible for almost two thirds of the medical radiation dose given to patients, computed tomography (CT) has been the major target of these news articles. Through this review of peer reviewed publications, an examination of the relationship between the advancement of technology in CT equipment and the increasing patient dose areexplored. Discussion includes CT scan protocols, demands of physicians, equipment capabilities, and possible solutions to address the problem. Although most of these issues are well known in the imaging community, a few of the results are somewhat surprising. The information disclosed will help form a path to a future with lowerradiation doses received by all patients.