Pharmacokinetics & drug resistance of melphalan in regional chemotherapy: ILP versus ILI

Two forms of regional chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma or sarcoma of the extremity are isolated limb perfusion (ILP) and the more recently described isolated limb infusion (ILI). Melphalan is the most commonly employed agent in both ILP and ILI, although it is often used in conjunction with other cytotoxic and/or biologic therapies. While ILP and ILI are far more effective for the treatment of extremity disease than is systemic therapy, there is still significant room for improvement in outcomes, from the standpoint of both response rate and toxicity. An understanding of the pharmacokinetics of regional chemotherapy would allow for the prediction of tumor response and toxicity and therefore patient outcomes. In addition, elucidating the mechanisms of drug resistance would lead to opportunities to develop effective chemo-modulators that enhance the effectiveness of ILP and ILI. This paper reviews progress in these two key areas of active investigation.     

Oncological outcome after hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion for primarily unresectable versus locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma of extremities

IntroductionThe management of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas, particularly in terms of a limb salvage strategy, represents a challenge, especially in recurrent tumors. In the context of a patient-tailored multimodal therapy, hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a promising limb-saving treatment option. We report the outcome of patients with primarily irresectable and locally recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated by ILP.Patients and methodsData about patient demographics, clinical und histopathological characteristics, tumor response, morbidity and oncological outcome of all patients with STS, who underwent an ILP at our institution in a 10-year period, were retrospectively detected and analyzed.ResultsThe cohort comprised 30 patients. Two patients were treated with ILP for palliative tumor control, 13 patients because of a local recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (rSTS) and 15 patients because of primarily unresectable soft tissue sarcoma (puSTS). 25 of the 28 patients with curative intention received surgery after ILP (11 pts with rSTS and 14 pts with puSTS). Histopathologically we observed complete response in 6 patients (24%) and partial responses in 19 patients (76%) with a significant better remission in patients with puSTS (p = 0,043). Limb salvage rate was 75%. Mean follow-up was 69 months [range 13–142 months]. Seven (7/11; 64%) patients with rSTS and one (1/14; 7%) patient with puSTS developed local recurrence after ILP and surgery, whereas eight (8/13; 62%) rSTS patients and seven (7/15; 47%) puSTS patients developed distant metastasis. During follow-up, eight patients (28.5%) died of disease (5/13; 38%) rSTS and 3/15 (20%) puSTS. ILP in the group of previously irradiated sarcoma patients (n = 13) resulted in a limb salvage rate of 69% and was not associated in an increased risk for adverse events.DiscussionILP for advanced extremity STS is a treatment option for both puSTS and rSTS resulting in good local control and should be considered in multimodal management. ILP is also a good option for patients after radiation history.     

Isolated limb perfusion for locally advanced melanoma in the immunotherapy era

BackgroundPrior to the advent of effective systemic therapy for melanoma, isolated limb perfusion (ILP) was the most effective local treatment for advanced in-transit melanoma (ITM). However, many patients who are now treated by ILP will have received prior immunotherapy. We sought to compare response rates to ILP in patients who had previously received immunotherapy compared to immunotherapy naive patients.Materials and methodsAll patients who underwent ILP for ITM between January 2015 and July 2020 for melanoma were identified retrospectively from two tertiary institutions. Surgical morbidity and oncologic outcomes were compared between immunotherapy naive and immunotherapy pre-treated patients.Results97 perfusions were performed for melanoma. Of those, 18 patients had undergone prior immunotherapy. There were no differences in clinicopathological characteristics or perioperative outcomes between cohorts. Surgical morbidity and local toxicity were similar between both cohorts. Patients who underwent immunotherapy prior to ILP had significantly decreased complete response (CR) rates compared with immunotherapy-naïve (6% vs 47%, p = 0.0018) and a significantly decreased overall survival (OS) and distant progression free survival (DPFS) (p = 0.0031 and p = 0.0006 respectively). There was no difference in overall response (OR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD) and local progression free survival (LPFS) between cohorts.ConclusionOncological outcomes and complete response rates are worse in patients who have received immunotherapy prior to ILP compared with immunotherapy naïve patients. Despite this, ILP is still a valuable second line treatment for local control in patients who have multiple, bulky and/or recurrent ITM post immunotherapy.     

Laparoscopic hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion a new minimally invasive approach for HILP

Background: Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) represents a limb-sparing treatment for unresectable soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities with substantial complete response rates. HILP often provides good functional limb preservation, hence a significant improvement also in terms of quality of life of the patient. Notwithstanding these clear advantages, the traditional technique is still hindered by relatively high post-operative morbidity.

Method: We treated a 78-year-old female with unresectable angiosarcoma of the left leg using a new surgical approach: an entirely laparoscopic HILP.

Results: No conversion from laparoscopic to “open” surgery was necessary. Since no abdominal muscle section was performed, post-operative pain was low and easily manageable; early mobilisation and early discharge were achieved. Patient developed moderate toxicity, which resolved spontaneously within 3–4 weeks, with complete return to normal daily activities after 30?d. Complete clinical response with preservation of leg function was obtained.

Conclusions: We describe for the first time an entirely laparoscopic HILP. Demonstration of this technique’s efficacy and safety on a large series of patients is clearly necessary but its therapeutic efficacy appears to be comparable to the standard technique. Furthermore, laparoscopic HILP has shown low post-operative morbidity: no wound complications, mild and easily manageable post-operative pain and early discharge from the hospital and early resuming of daily activities.     

Isolated limb perfusion for soft tissue sarcoma: Current practices and future directions. A survey of experts and a review of literature

Soft tissue sarcomas constitute 1% of adult malignant tumors. They are a heterogeneous group of more than 50 different histologic types. Isolated limb perfusion is an established treatment strategy for locally advanced sarcomas. Since its adoption for sarcomas in 1992, after the addition of TNFα, few modifications have been done and although indications for the procedure are essentially the same across centers, technical details vary widely. The procedures mainly involves a 60 min perfusion with melphalan and TNFα under mild hyperthermia, achieving a limb preservation rate of 72–96%; with an overall response rates from 72 to 82.5% and an acceptable toxicity according to the Wieberdink scale. The local failure rate is 27% after a median follow up of 14–31 months compared to 40% of distant recurrences after a follow up of 12–22 months. Currently there is no consensus regarding the benefit of ILP per histotype, and the value of addition of radiotherapy or systemic treatment. Further developments towards individualized treatments will provide a better understanding of the population that can derive maximum benefit of ILP with the least morbidity.     

Isolated limb infusion with fotemustine after dacarbazine chemosensitisation for inoperable loco-regional melanoma recurrence

BACKGROUND: Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is a simple yet effective alternative to conventional isolated limb perfusion for the treatment of advanced melanoma of the extremities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 13 patients with very advanced limb disease who had failed to achieve a satisfactory response to one or more ILIs with melphalan, and in whom amputation was the only other realistic treatment option. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ILI with fotemustine after systemic chemosensitisation with dacarbazine (DTIC). RESULTS: Complete remission was achieved in four patients and partial remission in eight patients, with a median response duration of 3 months. Limb salvage was achieved in five of 12 assessable patients (42%). Limb toxicity peaked 9 days after ILI; two patients experienced Wieberdink grade IV (severe) toxicity and four patients had grade V toxicity (requiring early amputation). CONCLUSIONS: ILI with fotemustine after DTIC chemosensitisation can be successful when gross limb disease has not been controlled by one or more ILIs with melphalan. However, it cannot be recommended as a routine method of treatment for advanced melanoma of the extremities because of the high incidence of severe limb toxicity.     

Use of an automated circuit for isolated limb infusion for malignancy

Background

Isolated limb infusion (ILI) for recurrent or in-transit melanoma is an accepted technique that allows high-dose chemotherapy to be delivered to an extremity with minimal systemic toxicity. Current infusion systems have relied on manual delivery of drugs and circulation of blood during the treatment. Herein, we document our initial results with an automated circuit for ILI as an alternative to the manual technique.

Methods

Patients undergoing ILI with an automated circuit for recurrent or advanced malignancy were identified. ILI was performed utilizing a Sarns 8000 roller pump attached to a Cobe 4:1 cardioplegia set with heat exchanger with a total priming volume of 80 ml. Melphalan (7.5 mg/L) and Dactinomycin (75 μg/L) doses which were corrected for ideal body weight were delivered via the infusion circuit after limb temperature reached 38 °C.

Results

Fourteen lower extremity infusion procedures were performed in 10 patients. Successful infusion procedures were completed in all patients using the automated circuit. Constant flow rates of 50–70 cc/minute were achievable with the automated circuit. Acute toxicity and clinical results were similar to that reported with manual delivery systems.

Conclusion

ILI for advanced malignancy utilizing an automated circuit is feasible and safe. This automated system offers a safe and reliable alternative to the manual infusion technique.     

Efficacy of high vs low dose TNF-isolated limb perfusion for locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma

Aims

The administration of a high dose of rTNF-α (3–4 mg) and Melphalan via isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for patients with locally advanced limb STS was shown to be effective. Reports that a low dose of TNF (1 mg) is as effective, led to the adoption of the low dose regimen as the treatment of choice. The purpose of this study was to compare two groups of patients with locally advanced limb STS, that was treated with high and low dose TNF-ILP, in terms of limb preservation.

Methods

Retrospective study of 41 patients who underwent ILP, with “high dose” (HD) and “low dose” (LD) TNF. ILP/TNF was performed on candidates to either amputation or significantly mutilating surgery without this treatment. In both groups, all patients, with the exception of three in each group, underwent resection of the residual tumor or tumor bed or limb 8–12 weeks after the procedure.

Results

In the HD group, marked tumor softening occurred within 48 h, and in tumors protruding through the skin, hemorrhagic necrosis was evident within 24 h. The overall response rate was 65.2%. Five patients achieved a CR and 10 had a PR; in five of these patients >90% necrosis of the tumor occurred. In eight patients, only minimal regression was observed (stabilization of disease). The rate of limb sparing was 69.5%. In the LD group, the overall response rate was 30.7%. CR was achieved in one patient. PR was observed in two. Two patients were lost to follow up. Of the remaining 15 patients, limb preservation was achieved in 53.3%.

Conclusion

Despite the retrospective comparison and possible selection bias, it is possible to raise the concern that at least some patients may benefit from a higher TNF dose perfusion in ILP for advanced limb STS.     

Regional hyperthermic perfusion with melphalan after surgery for recurrent malignant melanoma of the extremities – Long-term follow-up of a randomised trial

Introduction: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a treatment option most commonly used in the treatment of melanoma in-transit metastases of the extremities. The principle idea is to surgically isolate a region of the body and then deliver a high concentration of a chemotherapeutic agent together with hyperthermia. There have been three randomised trials exploring whether adjuvant ILP to patients with recurrent or high-risk primary melanomas increases survival; one of these trials has now been updated with a 25-year follow-up.

Methods: The original study randomised 69 patients (between 1981 and 1989) with their first satellite or in-transit recurrence to either wide excision (WE group, n?=?36 patients) or to WE and adjuvant ILP (WE?+?ILP group, n?=?33 patients). Follow-up data 25 years later concerning survival and cause of death was retrieved from the Swedish National Cause of Death Register.

Results: In the WE?+?ILP group there were 20 deaths (61%) due to melanoma compared with 26 deaths (72%) in the WE group (p?=?0.31). Median melanoma-specific survival was 95 months for WE?+?ILP compared to 38 months for the WE group, an almost 5 year benefit without statistical significance (p?=?0.24).

Discussion: There is no evidence that adjuvant ILP prolongs survival in patients with high-risk or recurrent melanoma; however, the existing randomised trials are largely underpowered to detect such a difference. New studies are exploring systemic immunological effects of ILP, and a combination of regional therapy and immunotherapy may serve as a rationale for new trials using ILP in the future.     

Outcomes of isolated limb perfusion in the treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review

Background

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) may provide a limb salvage option for locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) not amenable to local resection.

Methods

A systematic review was performed for studies reporting outcome of ILP for locally advanced STS performed after 1980 in patients aged ≥12 years old. The main endpoints were tumour response and limb salvage rates. Complication and recurrence rates were secondary endpoints.

Results

Eighteen studies were included, providing outcomes for 1030 patients. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha with melphalan was the commonest chemotherapy regime. When reported, 22% of cases achieved a complete tumour response (216/964, 15 studies) with an overall response rate of 72% (660/911, 15 studies). At median follow-up times ranging between 11 and 125 months, the limb salvage rate was 81% in patients who otherwise would have been subjected to amputation. However, 27% of patients suffered local recurrence and 40% suffered distant failure. ILP was associated with severe locoregional reactions in 4% (22/603) of patients. Amputation due to complications within 30 days was necessary in 1.2% of cases (7/586, nine studies). There was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of ILP on survival.

Conclusion

ILP induces a high tumour response rate, leads to a high limb salvage rate but is associated with a high recurrence rate. It provides a limb salvage alternative to amputation when local control is necessary.     

Myoglobin does not predict local toxicity in isolated limb perfusion

Introduction: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a treatment option for patients with in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma in the extremities, as well as locally advanced sarcoma. ILP allows for a delivery of high-dose chemotherapy to an isolated extremity with minimal systemic toxicity. However, local toxicity like oedema, blistering, nerve damage and compartment syndrome can occur. Myoglobin measurements have been used as a screening method to predict the most severe cases of local toxicity. The aim was to investigate if myoglobin is a predictive factor for local toxicity after ILP in patients with melanoma in-transit metastases.

Methods: One hundred and ninety-three patients were treated for the first time with ILP for in-transit metastases between 2001 and 2015. Myoglobin was measured once the first hours after the perfusion (POD0), and for the first five post-operative days (POD1-5). Local toxicity was graded according to Wieberdink, and grouped in mild (I and II), moderate (III), and severe (IV and V). Wieberdink-groups were compared with myoglobin measurements, and myoglobin measurements were compared between gender, perfusion time, perfusion temperature and cannulated vessels.

Results: There is no statistically significant difference in myoglobin serum levels during the first five days post perfusion between patients suffering from mild, moderate or severe local toxicity. There is no difference between toxicity groups when it comes to distribution of sex, tumour size, or tumour numbers.

Conclusion: Levels of myoglobin do not predict local toxicity for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases treated with ILP when measured during the first five post-operative days.     

Treatment modifications in tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF)-based isolated limb perfusion in patients with advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas

BackgroundTumour necrosis factor-α (TNF) and melphalan based isolated limb perfusion (TM-ILP) is an attractive treatment option for advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS). This study reports on a 20-year single centre experience and discusses the evolution and changes in methodology since the introduction of TNF in ILP.Patients and methodsWe performed 306 TM-ILPs in 275 patients with extremity STS. All patients were candidates for amputation or mutilating surgery in order to achieve local control. Clinical response evaluation consisted of clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. To evaluate the importance of TNF-dose, treatment results of two periods (1991–2003 high dose (3–4 mg) TNF; 2003–2012 reduced dose (1–2 mg) TNF) were compared.ResultsDuring the study period, more femoral perfusions were done instead of iliac perfusions. Reduction of TNF dose and reduction of total ILP time did not lead to different clinical response rates (70% and 69% for periods 1 and 2 respectively) or different local recurrence rates, but was associated with less local toxicity (23% and 14% for periods 1 and 2 respectively). Hospital stay was significantly reduced during the study period. There was an improved pathological response in the high dose TNF group without consequences for clinical outcome.ConclusionTM-ILP remains a very effective treatment modality for limb threatening extremity STS. Moreover, reduction of dose and the growing experience in ILP led to less local toxicity and shorter hospital stay.     

Isolated limb perfusion of soft tissue sarcomas: A comprehensive review of literature

Patients with primary irresectable, locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the limbs form a challenging group for the treating physician. Multimodality treatment is necessary to guarantee optimal limb salvage and survival rates. Since the introduction of isolated limb perfusion in the late fifties, several treatment regimens have been proposed. Isolated perfusion with melphalan and TNF-α, as part of a multimodality treatment, is regarded as the current best treatment option today. Ongoing studies are investigating potential benefit of other doses, new chemotherapeutic agents and new techniques in perfusion and radiotherapy. This article provides a historical overview of published literature and insight in upcoming treatment techniques.     

Health-related quality of life after isolated limb perfusion compared to extended resection,or amputation for locally advanced extremity sarcoma: Is a limb salvage strategy worth the effort?

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare long-term patient reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS) after isolated limb perfusion followed by resection (IR), compared to extended resection (ER), primary amputation (A) or secondary amputation after IR (IR-A).MethodsPatients were selected from the respondents of a multi-institutional cross-sectional cohort survivorship study (SURVSARC) conducted among sarcoma survivors registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR), 2–10 years after diagnosis. Used PROs were the EORTC QLQ-C30, the Cancer worry scale (CWS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS).ResultsWe identified 97 eSTS survivors: IR = 20, ER = 49, A = 20, IR-A = 8. While there were no differences in PROs between IR and ER, results showed better functioning and functionality in both groups versus the amputation groups. The amputation groups scored significantly lower on physical functioning (A = 62.7, IR-A = 65.7 versus IR = 78.0, ER = 82.7, p = 0.001) and role functioning (A = 67.5, IR-A = 52.8 versus IR = 79.2, ER = 80.6, p = 0.039), both EORTC QLQ-C30 scales. Also for the TESS, the scores were significantly lower for the amputation groups compared to the limb sparing groups (upper extremity p = 0.007 with A = 68.9, IR-A = 71.6 versus IR = 93.3, ER = 91.1; lower extremity p < 0.001 with A = 72.2, IR-A50.9 versus IR = 84.5 and ER = 85.5). There were no significant differences between the groups on cancer worry, anxiety and depression.ConclusionHRQoL in eSTS survivors treated with IR or ER is equal; for maintenance of physical functioning and functionality IR and ER outperform an amputation.     

Isolated Limb Perfusion for Malignant Melanoma: Systematic Review on Effectiveness and Safety

Background.

Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) involves the administration of chemotherapy drugs directly into a limb involved by locoregional metastases. Unresectable locally advanced melanoma of the limbs represents one of the clinical settings in which ILP has demonstrated benefits.

Methods.

A systematic review of the literature on ILP for patients with unresectable locally advanced melanoma of the limbs was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane database searches were conducted to identify studies fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: hyper- or normothermic ILP with melphalan with or without tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or other drugs providing valid data on clinical response, survival, or toxicity. To allocate levels of evidence and grades of recommendation the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network system was used.

Results.

Twenty-two studies including 2,018 ILPs were selected with a clear predominance of observational studies (90.90%) against experimental studies (9.10%). The median complete response rate to ILP was of 58.20%, with a median overall response rate of 90.35%. ILP with melphalan yielded a median complete response rate of 46.50%, against a 68.90% median complete response rate for melphalan plus TNF ILP. The median 5-year overall-survival rate was 36.50%, with a median overall survival interval of 36.70 months. The Wieberdink IV and V regional toxicity rates were 2.00% and 0.65%, respectively.

Conclusions.

ILP is effective in achieving clinical responses in patients with unresectable locally advanced melanoma of the limbs. The disease-free and overall survival rates provided by ILP are acceptable. ILP is safe, with a low incidence of severe regional and systemic toxicity.     

Efficacy of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC): A multicenter experience

Background

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and potentially aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin, with a propensity for locoregional metastases. In two expert referral centers, isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is used to obtain locoregional control in selected locoregionally advanced MCC patients. This study describes our experience.

Anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade improves the efficacy of a melphalan-based therapy in experimental melanoma

IntroductionThe induction of adaptive cellular immunity in patients with in-transit melanoma metastasis treated with hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with melphalan has been shown to contribute to the effectiveness of the therapy. Activated CD8⁺ T cells appear to be of particular importance for the efficacy of melphalan-based ILP therapy, as observed in both patients and animal models. In this study, we explored the possible synergistic effects of combining melphalan-based therapy with the checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD-1 on tumours in a mouse melanoma model.MethodsA murine vaccination model that utilized melphalan-exposed melanoma cells was used to mimic certain immunological features of melphalan-based ILP. The effects of the vaccine on tumour growth and PD-1 expression on CD8⁺ tumour-infiltrating T cells were analyzed. The melphalan-based vaccine was then combined with an anti-PD-1 antibody and tumour growth was assessed.ResultsTreatment with melphalan-based therapy significantly induced the expression of PD-1 on CD8⁺ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Combination therapy using melphalan-based therapy followed by treatment with PD-1 antibodies significantly reduced early-stage tumour growth relative to monotherapies and no treatment.ConclusionsThis study thus suggests that the addition of PD-1 blockade to melphalan-based therapies, such as ILP, may be therapeutically beneficial.     

Histological response assessment following neoadjuvant isolated limb perfusion in patients with primary,localised, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma

Purpose: Histological response assessment following neoadjuvant treatment can help identify patients at a higher risk for systemic disease progression. Our goal was to evaluate whether mitotic count and the amount of viable tumour following neoadjuvant isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for primary, locally advanced, non-metastatic, high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma correlate with prognosis. Patients and methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of 61 patients who underwent neoadjuvant ILP followed by surgical resection with curative intent between 2001 and 2011. Non-parametric analyses were carried out with the Mann-Whitney U and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Survival curves were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: The median follow-up was 44 months for all patients and 55 months for survivors. The amount of viable tumour after ILP had no correlation with overall (OS) (P?=?0.227) or event-free (EFS) (P?=?0.238) survival probability. Patients with a low mitotic count after ILP had a significantly higher OS (P?<?0.001), EFS (P?=?0.002) and post-relapse survival probability (P?=?0.030) compared to patients with an intermediate or high mitotic count. Conclusions: The mitotic count following ILP for primary, high-grade, locally advanced, non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma appears to significantly correlate with prognosis. If these results are validated in a prospective setting, they could provide a rationale for the design of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy trials with the goal of improving the prognosis of patients with an intermediate or high mitotic count after ILP.     

Evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity of upper extremity isolated limb infusion chemotherapy for melanoma: An Australian multi-center study

BackgroundIsolated limb infusion (ILI) is a minimally invasive treatment for patients with locally advanced extremity melanoma. Most studies combine results of upper-limb ILI (UL-ILI) and lower-limb ILI (LL-ILI), leaving UL-ILIs relatively underreported as LL-ILIs comprise the vast majority in these reports. However, differences between the two procedures may be clinically important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of UL-ILI in an Australian multi-center setting.Patients and methods316 ILI procedures for melanoma performed between 1992 and 2008 in five Australian institutions were analyzed. In all institutions melphalan (±actinomycin D) was circulated in the isolated limb for 20–30 min.ResultsBaseline patient characteristics for UL-ILI (n = 27) and LL-ILI (n = 289) were similar, except that more men underwent UL-ILI (66% vs. 38%; p = 0.007) and disease in LL-ILI was mostly located on the distal limb (p = 0.02). Median tourniquet times were shorter for UL-ILI (38 vs. 48 min; p = 0.04) and UL-ILI patients experienced less limb toxicity (Grade III/IV in 24% vs. 31%; p = 0.01). Complete response (CR) rates were similar: 33% after LL-ILI (p = 0.70), 30% after UL-ILI, while overall response (OR) rates were higher after LL-ILI: (76%) than UL-ILI (59%; p = 0.05). No difference in survival was seen.ConclusionsUL-ILI is safe to perform and effective, resulting in low limb toxicity. CR rates were similar to those for LL-ILI, but OR rates were lower for UL-ILI. It may be possible to improve OR rates achieved by UL-ILI by optimizing perioperative factors, while maintaining low toxicity.     

First Eastern European experience of isolated limb infusion for in-transit metastatic melanoma confined to the limb: Is it still an effective treatment option in the modern era?

BackgroundIsolated limb infusion (ILI) with cytotoxic agents is a simple and effective treatment option for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases (ITMs) confined to an extremity. Data for ILIs performed in Europe are sparse and to date no Eastern European ILI experience has been reported. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of ILI in Estonia.Patients and methodsData for twenty-one patients were collected and analysed. All patients had melanoma ITMs and underwent an ILI between January 2012 and May 2018. The cytotoxic drug combination of melphalan and actinomycin-D was used. Drug circulation times were 20–30 min under mildly hyperthermic conditions (38–39 °C). Primary outcome measures were treatment response and overall survival.ResultsNineteen lower limb and two upper limb ILIs were performed. The female to male ratio was 18:3. The overall response rate (complete + partial response) was 76% (n = 16), with a complete response in 38% (n = 8). The overall long-term limb salvage rate was 90% (n = 19). During follow-up, eight patients (38%) died, two due to metastatic melanoma. Five-year overall survival was 57%.ConclusionThis first Eastern European report of ILI for melanoma ITMs shows results comparable to those from other parts of the world. In this era of effective targeted and immune therapies, ILI remains a useful treatment option, with a high overall response rate and durable responses in patients with melanoma ITMs confined to a limb.