Atezolizumab in Japanese Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 OAK Study

Introduction

Atezolizumab, an anti–programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) agent, is effective and well tolerated in patients with pretreated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed its efficacy and safety in Japanese patients through subgroup analyses of the phase 3 OAK study (NCT02008227).

Phase II Study of Cetuximab,Docetaxel, and Gemcitabine in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundTargeting epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) has been a novel strategy in treating non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This multicenter, community-based trial was designed to examine the role of cetuximab in combination with a nonplatinum regimen.Patients and MethodsEligibility criteria were newly diagnosed unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC, all histologies, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2. Treatment premedication included dexamethasone 20 mg orally 12 and 6 hours before treatment, and 4 mg 12 hours following treatment; diphenhydramine 50 mg intravenously (I.V.) and cimetidine 300 mg I.V. before cetuximab. Treatment medication included docetaxel 30 mg/m² I.V. days 1 and 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² I.V. days 1 and 8; and cetuximab 400 mg/m² I.V. day 1, then 250 mg/m² I.V. weekly. Patients received up to 6 cycles with restaging every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was an overall response rate (ORR) ≥ 25%.ResultsSixty-nine patients enrolled from July 2005 to October 2007. Patients had a median age of 69 years; 70% were male and 30% were female; ECOG PS was 0 in 42%, 1 in 51%, and 2 in 7%; patients had adenocarcinoma (42%), squamous cell (30%), large cell (6%), mixed (1%), and not otherwise specified (20%) disease. The ORR was 17% (95% CI, 9%-29%). Thirty-five patients (54%) had stable disease; 14 patients (22%) had progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 17.8 months, the median progression-free and overall survivals were 4 months and 9.4 months, respectively. The most common (> 10%) grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (25%), rash (22%), and fatigue (12%). Accrual in our middle Tennessee offices was temporarily suspended and ultimately stopped because of a higher-than-anticipated rate of cetuximab-related severe hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) in 4 patients among the first 12 enrolled, including 1 fatal event.ConclusionCetuximab/docetaxel/gemcitabine was relatively well-tolerated and associated with efficacy similar to chemotherapy alone. Additional study with cetuximab/chemotherapy in NSCLC should focus on new potentially predictive biomarkers. Also, additional study is needed to better understand and prevent the severe HSRs that appear to be endemic to specific regions of the United States.     

A Phase I Open-Label Dose-Escalation Study of Intravenous BI 2536 Together With Pemetrexed in Previously Treated Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionBI 2536 is a potent, highly selective inhibitor of polo-like kinase (Plk) 1. This open-label, phase I study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of BI 2536 IV in combination with standard-dose pemetrexed in previously treated advanced or metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer.Patients and MethodsA standard 3 + 3 design was used. The patients received 500 mg/m² pemetrexed and escalating doses of BI 2536 on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary objective was the MTD of BI 2536 combined with pemetrexed. Secondary endpoints were response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), overall safety, and PK.ResultsForty-one patients received BI 2536 (100-325 mg). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred at BI 2536 325 mg (grade 3 pruritus and rash; grade 4 neutropenia). Therefore, the MTD for BI 2536 in combination with pemetrexed was 300 mg. After expanding the MTD dose level, 3 additional patients experienced DLTs, which resulted in expansion of the 250 mg cohort, in which 4 of the 13 additional patients experienced DLTs. Therefore, the recommended dose of BI 2536 was 200 mg. Most frequently reported drug-related adverse events were fatigue (71%), nausea (37%), and rash (34%). Two patients had durable confirmed partial responses; 21 (54%) patients had stable disease after the treatment cycle 2. PK analysis showed that BI 2536 and pemetrexed exposure were not altered when coadministered.ConclusionBI 2536 200 mg combined with standard-dose pemetrexed has an acceptable safety profile in relapsed non–small-cell lung cancer. The antitumor activity observed is encouraging and supports further investigation of Plk inhibitors.     

Treatment Rationale and Design for J-AXEL: A Randomized Phase 3 Study Comparing Nab-Paclitaxel With Docetaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) paclitaxel is a promising new therapeutic agent for all histologic types of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We recently performed a phase 2 study of weekly nab-paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC, finding promising activity and acceptable toxicity for this regimen. We have now designed a randomized phase 3 intergroup study (J-AXEL, UMIN000017487) to examine the clinical benefit and safety of nab-paclitaxel compared to docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC.

Phase 2 Study of Nimotuzumab in Combination With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundWe evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of nimotuzumab, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal anti–epidermal growth factor receptor antibody, with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer.Patients and MethodsIn this multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial conducted in Japan (JapicCTI-090825), patients received thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy, 2 Gy per fraction, 6 weeks) and four 4-week cycles of chemotherapy (day 1, cisplatin 80 mg/m²; days 1 and 8, vinorelbine 20 mg/m²). Nimotuzumab 200 mg was administrated weekly for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was treatment completion rate, defined as the percentage of patients completing 60 Gy of radiotherapy within 8 weeks, 2 cycles of chemotherapy, and at least 75% of the required nimotuzumab dose during the initial 2-cycle concurrent chemoradiotherapy period.ResultsOf 40 patients enrolled, 39 received the study treatment, which was well tolerated, with a completion rate of 87.2%. Thirty-eight patients completed 60 Gy of radiotherapy within 8 weeks. Infusion reaction, grade 3 or higher rash, grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis, or grade 4 or higher nonhematologic toxicity were not observed. The objective response rate was 69.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and 5-year PFS rate were 508 days and 29.0%, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate in patients with non–squamous cell carcinoma (n = 23) was 13.7% and in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (n = 16) was 50.0%. The 5-year overall survival rate was 58.4%.ConclusionAddition of nimotuzumab to the concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen was well tolerated and showed potential for treating patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer, particularly squamous cell carcinoma.     

Nested Case Control Study of Proteomic Biomarkers for Interstitial Lung Disease in Japanese Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Erlotinib: A Multicenter Phase IV Study (JO21661)

BackgroundInterstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious adverse drug reaction associated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs). Its risk factors are yet to be fully elucidated. We sought to identify proteomic biomarkers associated with ILD development in erlotinib-treated Japanese patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to build predictive models.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a nested case-control study. The participants were patients with NSCLC enrolled in a phase IV study of erlotinib in whom ILD developed within 120 days after erlotinib administration. The controls were randomly selected patients without ILD from the overall study cohort who were also treated with erlotinib. Serum samples were obtained before the first administration of erlotinib and were assayed by liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy/mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the peptide and proteins associated with ILD.ResultsA total of 645 patients were enrolled in the cohort; 15 case patients and 64 controls were analyzed. When multiplicity was taken into account, we were unable to statistically verify any genuine association between individual markers and ILD. Investigation of the predictive power based on leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) showed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.73 at a maximum. Additional analysis suggested that 3 proteins (C3, C4A/C4B, and APOA1) have a stronger association with ILD than do the other proteins tested.ConclusionWe were unable to demonstrate predictive serum protein markers for ILD development. However, C3, C4A/C4B, and APOA1 are worthy of further investigation.     

Updated Efficacy Analysis Including Secondary Population Results for OAK: A Randomized Phase III Study of Atezolizumab versus Docetaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction

The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as second- or third-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC in the primary (n = 850) and secondary (n = 1225) efficacy populations of the randomized phase III OAK study (respectively referred to as the intention-to-treat [ITT] 850 [ITT850] and ITT1225) at an updated data cutoff were assessed.

A Phase I Study of Temsirolimus and Thoracic Radiation in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundThe addition of targeted agents to thoracic radiation has not improved outcomes in patients with locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To improve cure rates in locally advanced NSCLC, effective targeted therapies need to be identified that can be given safely with radiation therapy. Temsirolimus is an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway and has single-agent activity in lung cancer. Inhibition of the mTOR pathway has been found to augment the cytotoxic effect of radiation in preclinical studies. There is scant clinical experience with mTOR inhibitors and radiation.Patients and MethodsThis was a phase I study evaluating the combination of temsirolimus with thoracic radiation in patients with NSCLC.ResultsTen patients were enrolled in the study. The dose-limiting toxicities included sudden death, pneumonitis, and pulmonary hemorrhage. The maximum tolerated dose of temsirolimus that could be administered safely with concurrent radiotherapy (35 Gy in 14 daily fractions) was 15 mg intravenously weekly. Of the 8 evaluable patients, 3 had a partial response and 2 had stable disease.ConclusionThe combination of temsirolimus 15 mg weekly and thoracic radiation is well tolerated and warrants further investigation, perhaps in a molecularly defined subset of patients.     

Importance of Quality of Life in Patients with Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The therapeutic options for patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are palliative. Therefore, the quality of life in oncology is considered as an endpoint in clinical trials, and several scales have been accepted for its measurement in parallel with other clinical determinations. However, its use in clinical practice is hindered by various obstacles that need to be overcome. In this article we examine the concept of the quality of life in patients with NSCLC, as well as giving an evaluation and interpretation of the results of various clinical trials. We describe the new technological methods used in daily clinical practice to measure the quality of life.     

A Phase Ib,Dose-Finding Study of Erlotinib in Combination With a Fixed Dose of Pertuzumab in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundPertuzumab, a dimerization inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), has demonstrated pharmacodynamic activity, with stable disease in non–small-cell lung cancer. Combining erlotinib and pertuzumab may enhance antitumor activity. This study aimed to establish the recommended dosing of the erlotinib and pertuzumab combination; assess safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics; and analyze biomarkers.Patients and MethodsFifteen patients with stage IIIb/IV non–small-cell lung cancer who failed chemotherapy were recruited. The patients received erlotinib (days ?8 to ?1), then combination therapy (21-day cycles for 6 cycles). Pertuzumab was given intravenous at 840 mg, then 420 mg once every three weeks, with erlotinib given daily (100 or 150 mg).ResultsNo dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Adverse events were generally grade 1/2 and manageable. The objective response rate was 20% (3/15 patients; 2 responders had mutant HER1, 1 responder had wild-type HER1), median overall progression-free survival was 9.3 weeks. High HER1, HER2, and HER3 messenger RNA expression correlated with increased progression-free survival. Combination therapy did not affect erlotinib's pharmacokinetics; however, pertuzumab mean exposures (maximum concentration, 231 mg/L; area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 21 days, 1780 mg*d/L) were slightly higher than in previous studies.ConclusionsCombination therapy was well tolerated in patients with good performance status, with encouraging efficacy. A loading dose of pertuzumab 840 mg followed by 420 mg once every three weeks plus daily erlotinib 150 mg appears to be the most appropriate regimen for this combination.