Women Veterans’ Experiences of Harassment and Perceptions of Veterans Affairs Health Care Settings During a National Anti-Harassment Campaign

PurposeIn 2017, Veterans Health Administration (VA) launched a social marketing and training campaign to address harassment of women veterans at VA health care facilities. We assessed women veterans’ experiences of harassment, reported perpetrators of harassment, and perceptions of VA in 2017 (before campaign launch) and 2018 (1 year after campaign implementation).MethodsWe administered surveys to women veterans attending primary care appointments (2017, n = 1,300; 2018, n = 1,711). Participants reported whether they experienced sexual harassment (e.g., catcalls) and gender harassment (e.g., questioning women's veteran status) from patients and/or staff at VA in the past 6 months. They also indicated whether they felt welcome, felt safe, and believed the VA is working to address harassment. We compared variables in 2017 versus 2018 with χ² analyses, adjusting for facility-level clustering.ResultsThere were no significant differences in percentages of participants reporting sexual harassment (20% vs. 17%) or gender harassment (11% vs. 11%) in 2017 versus 2018. Men veterans were the most frequently named perpetrators, but participants also reported harassment from staff. Participant beliefs that VA is working to address harassment significantly improved from 2017 to 2018 (52% vs. 57%; p = .05).ConclusionsOne year after campaign launch, women veterans continued to experience harassment while accessing VA health care services. Findings confirm that ongoing efforts to address and monitor both staff- and patient-perpetrated harassment are essential. Results have implications for future anti-harassment intervention design and implementation and highlight additional opportunities for investigation.     

Differences in Depression Care for Men and Women among Veterans with and without Psychiatric Comorbidities

BackgroundDepression is common among primary care patients, affecting more women than men. Women veterans are an extreme but growing minority among patients seeking care from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), an organization historically designed to serve men. Little is known about gender differences in depression care quality within the VA primary care population.PurposeThis works assesses the gender differences in depression care among veterans using longitudinal electronic measures.MethodsWe undertook a cross-sectional study of all veteran VA primary care users with a new episode of depression from federal fiscal year 2010, covering nine geographically diverse regions. We assessed the quality of depression care based on receipt of minimally appropriate depression treatment within 1 year of a new episode of depression and on receipt of depression-related follow-up visits within 180 days. Minimally appropriate treatment and follow-up were operationalized as meeting or exceeding a minimally appropriate threshold for care, based on national quality measures and expert panel consensus. Regression models were used to produce predicted probabilities for each process outcome accounting for the presence or absence of other psychiatric comorbidities. All models were adjusted for model covariates and clinic clusters (404 sites).Main FindingsIn 2010, 110,603 veterans with a primary care visit had a new episode of depression; 10,094 (9%) were women. In multivariate analyses, women had modest yet significantly higher rates of minimally appropriate depression treatment than men, whether patients had depression only (79% of women vs. 76% of men; p < .001) or depression along with other psychiatric comorbidities (92% of women vs. 91% or men; p < .001). There were no significant gender differences for rate of receipt of follow-up for depression at 180 days. Interactions between gender and other psychiatric comorbidities were not significant.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the VA is achieving comparable depression care between genders at minimally appropriate thresholds.     

Timeliness and Adequacy of Prenatal Care Among Department of Veterans Affairs–Enrolled Veterans: The First Step May Be the Biggest Hurdle

IntroductionLittle is known about access to and use of prenatal care by veterans using U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) maternity benefits. We compared the timeliness and adequacy of prenatal care by veteran status and payor.Study DesignWe used VA clinical and admistrative data linked with California vital statistics patient discharge data to identify all births to VA-enrolled veterans and non-veterans between 2000 and 2012. Births were categorized based on veteran status and payor (non-veterans with Medicaid, non-veterans with private insurance, VA-enrolled veterans using VA maternity care benefits, and VA-enrolled veterans with other payor). Outcomes were timeliness of prenatal care (initiation before the end of the first trimester) and adequacy of prenatal care as measured by the Kotelchuck Index (inadequate, intermediate, adequate). Covariates included demographic, health, and pregnancy characteristics. We used generalized linear models and multinomial logistic regression to analyze the association of veteran status and payor with timeliness of prenatal care and adequacy of prenatal care, respectively.ResultsWe identified 6,196,432 births among VA-enrolled veterans (n = 17,495) and non-veterans (n = 6,178,937). Non-veterans using Medicaid had the lowest percentage of timely prenatal care (78.1%; n = 2,240,326), followed by VA-enrolled veterans using VA maternity care benefits (82.8%; n = 1,248). VA-enrolled veterans using VA maternity care benefits were the most likely to receive adequate prenatal care (92.0%; n = 1,365). Results remained consistent after adjustment.ConclusionsThis study provides key baseline data regarding access to and use of prenatal care by veterans using VA maternity benefits. Longitudinal studies including more recent data are needed to understand the impact of changing VA policy.     

Implementing and Evaluating a Telephone-Based Centralized Maternity Care Coordination Program for Pregnant Veterans in the Department of Veterans Affairs

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a comprehensive, telephonic maternity care coordination (MCC) program for all pregnant veterans enrolled for care at New England Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities that comprise the Veterans Integrated Service Network 1.Research DesignTelephone interviews were conducted with postpartum women veterans who had participated in the MCC program during their pregnancies. The program evaluation instrument assessed satisfaction and use of MCC services, prenatal education classes, and infant and maternal outcomes (e.g., newborn birthweight, insurance status, maternal depression) using both closed-ended and open-ended questions.ResultsA substantial majority (95%) of women enrolled in the MCC program expressed satisfaction with the services they received in the program. Women were most satisfied with help understanding VA maternity benefits and acquiring VA services and equipment, such as breast pumps and pregnancy-related medications. More than one-third of women noted their infants had experienced health problems since delivery, including neonatal intensive care unit hospitalizations. A majority of women planned to return to VA care in the future.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that MCC services play an important role for women veterans as they navigate both VA and non-VA care systems. MCC staff members coordinated maternity, medical, and mental health care services for women veterans. Additionally, by maintaining contact with the veteran during the postpartum period, MCC staff were able to assess the health of the mother and the infant, and refer women and their infants to medical and psychosocial services in the community as needed.     

Factors Impacting Perceived Access to Early Prenatal Care among Pregnant Veterans Enrolled in the Department of Veterans Affairs

Background

Despite the relatively recent Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) policy advances in providing care for veterans and their infants during the perinatal period, little information exists regarding access to prenatal care for women veterans. Currently, VA medical centers do not provide onsite pregnancy care for veterans, but pay for care from community obstetricians through the Veterans Choice Program (VCP) and related non-VA care programs. The VCP is subcontracted to two large contractors, Health Net and TriWest, to assist the VA in administering the VCP. To date, no studies have evaluated women’s perceived access to prenatal care under the VCP.

Characterization and Comparison of Physical and Mental Health Profiles and Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Utilization Patterns among Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom Women Veterans in Puerto Rico versus the United States

BackgroundResearch on the physical and mental health profiles and patterns of health care use among women veterans receiving health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on the island of Puerto Rico is lacking.MethodsThis cross-sectional study examines differences in physical and mental health conditions, and patterns of VA health care use, between women veterans of the Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) era who were using VA facilities in Puerto Rico (n = 897) and those using U.S.-based VA facilities (n = 117,216) from 2002 to 2015.ResultsResults of fully adjusted logistic regression models revealed that OIF/OEF women in Puerto Rico had heightened risk for global pain-related disorders (i.e., any pain) (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–1.71), back pain (AOR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.56–2.14), diabetes (AOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.03–1.95), hyperlipidemia (AOR, 3.34; 95% CI, 2.80–3.98), major depression (AOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.53–2.06), and bipolar depression (AOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.34–2.04). They also evidenced greater risk for a host of reproductive health conditions and had higher average annual use of VA health care than their U.S. counterparts.ConclusionsOIF/OEF women receiving VA health care in Puerto Rico evidenced a greater burden of physical illness, depression, and heightened use of VA health care services relative to their U.S. counterparts. Providers’ increased awareness of the physical and mental health care needs of this population is warranted. Research efforts that help to identify efficient and effective strategies to provide culturally tailored and/or personalized health care for this population could also be useful.     

Reproductive and Other Health Outcomes in Iraq and Afghanistan Women Veterans Using VA Health Care: Association with Mental Health Diagnoses

BackgroundAn increasing number of women serve in the military and are exposed to trauma during service that can lead to mental health problems. Understanding how these mental health problems affect reproductive and physical health outcomes will inform interventions to improve care for women veterans.MethodsWe analyzed national Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) data from women Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who were new users of VA healthcare from October 7, 2001, through December 31, 2010 (n = 71,504). We used ICD-9 codes to categorize veterans into five groups by mental health diagnoses (MH Dx): Those with no MH Dx, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, comorbid PTSD and depression, and a MH Dx other than PTSD and depression. We determined the association between mental health category and reproductive and other physical health outcomes defined by ICD-9 codes. Categories included sexually transmitted infections, other infections (e.g., urinary tract infections), pain-related conditions (e.g., dysmenorrhea and dsypareunia), and other conditions (e.g., polycystic ovarian syndrome, infertility, sexual dysfunction). Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and military service factors.ResultsThere were 31,481 patients (44%) who received at least one mental health diagnosis. Women veterans with any mental health diagnosis had significantly higher prevalences of nearly all categories of reproductive and physical disease diagnoses (p < .0001 for adjusted prevalences). There was a trend of increasing prevalence of disease outcomes in women with PTSD, depression, and comorbid PTSD and depression (p for trend <.0001 for all outcomes).ConclusionsIraq and Afghanistan women veterans with mental health diagnoses had significantly greater prevalences of several important reproductive and physical health diagnoses. These results provide support for VA initiatives to address mental and physical health concerns and improve comprehensive care for women veterans.     

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Severity and Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Veterans Health Administration Use among Women Veterans

BackgroundThe Veterans Health Administration (VA) has historically focused on treating men. Although women veterans' VA use is increasing, they remain more likely than male veterans to receive their care in non-VA settings. To date, there is limited research on factors associated with VA use among women. We examined the relationship between demographic, civilian, military, and health-related variables with past-year VA use among women veterans.MethodsWomen veterans were recruited over the internet to participate in an anonymous national survey (n = 617) in 2013. An empirically derived decision tree was computed using signal detection software for iterative receiver operator characteristics (ROC) to identify variables with the best sensitivity/specificity balance associated with past-year VA use.ResultsROC analysis indicated that 85% of participants with high posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive symptoms and who were younger than 54 years of age used VA in the past year. Of those who were 54 years of age or older and had very high PTSD symptoms, 94% used the VA in the last year. By contrast, only 40% of participants with relatively lower PTSD symptoms had VA past-year use, although among these individuals, VA past-year use increased to 65% for those with a relatively lower income.ConclusionsFindings suggest that greater PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms, and low income correlate with VA use, with very high PTSD symptoms in older groups, high PTSD symptoms coupled with high depressive symptoms in younger groups, and low income in those with lower PTSD symptoms each associated with greater past-year VA use. Ensuring PTSD assessment and treatment, and addressing socioeconomic factors, may be key strategies for health care delivered directly or through contract with VA facilities.     

Primary Care Providers' Perspectives on Providing Care to Women Veterans with Histories of Sexual Trauma

BackgroundOne in four women Veterans who use the Veterans Health Administration (VA) screen positive for military sexual trauma and may need trauma-sensitive care and coordination. VA primary care providers (PCPs), women veterans' main source of care, need to be well-versed in trauma-sensitive approaches to care. Women veterans' numerical minority in the VA can make provider exposure to female patients inconsistent, which may impede PCP experience in providing appropriate care. To inform strategies for improving trauma-sensitive primary care, we sought to better understand PCPs’ current approaches to providing care to women veterans with sexual trauma histories.MethodsWe conducted semistructured telephone interviews with PCPs (n = 28) practicing in VA primary care clinics. Participants were asked about their experiences delivering trauma-sensitive care as well as best practices. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for major themes regarding barriers to and facilitators of trauma-sensitive care.ResultsParticipants expressed challenges delivering care to women with sexual trauma histories, including 1) insufficient time, 2) lack of perceived proficiency and/or personal comfort (with general physical examinations as well as gender-specific care such as Pap, breast, and pelvic examinations), and 3) difficulties with fostering positive patient–provider relationships. Access to mental health resources was noted as a key facilitator of providing trauma-sensitive care. Participants also shared existing (and potential) best practices and recommendations, such as paying special attention to patient behavioral cues related to comfort.ConclusionsPCPs delivering care to women in VA facilities may benefit from an increased awareness of best practices to facilitate the delivery of trauma-sensitive care.     

Primary Care Providers with More Experience and Stronger Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding Women Veterans Screen More Frequently for Interpersonal Violence

BackgroundMilitary sexual trauma (MST) and/or intimate partner violence (IPV) are common experiences in the growing group of women veterans using the Veterans Health Administration health care system. And even though MST screening is closely monitored at the facility level, little is known about individual primary care provider (PCP) behavior with regard to screening women for MST and IPV.ObjectivesTo understand how PCP experiences and beliefs regarding women's health care influence PCP-reported screening for MST and IPV.Research Design and ParticipantsWe administered a cross-sectional online survey from September 2014 through April 2015 (supplemented by a mailed survey between April and May 2015) to 281 PCPs in 12 Veterans Health Administration medical centers.Measures and AnalysisSurveys measured PCP-reported screening frequency for MST and IPV, experience with women veterans, self-efficacy, gender-sensitive beliefs, and perceived barriers to providing comprehensive care for women. We used multivariable ordered logistic regression analysis to identify correlates of screening, weighted for nonresponse and adjusted for clustering.ResultsNinety-four PCPs (34%) completed the survey. Being a designated women's health provider (p < .05) and stronger self-efficacy beliefs about screening women for MST (p < .001) were associated with reporting more frequent screening for MST. Being a designated women's health provider (p < .01), seeing women patients at least once per week (p < .001), and self-efficacy beliefs about screening women for IPV (p < .001) were associated with reporting more frequent screening for IPV.ConclusionsVeterans Health Administration initiatives to enhance PCP opportunities to screen women veterans for trauma and to strengthen self-efficacy beliefs about comprehensive women's health care may increase screening of women veterans for MST and IPV.     

Women Veterans' Perspectives on How to Make Veterans Affairs Healthcare Settings More Welcoming to Women

PurposeWomen veterans are a rapidly increasing subset of the Veterans Affairs (VA) patient population but remain a numerical minority. Men veteran-dominated health care settings pose unique considerations for providing care to women veterans in a comfortable and welcoming environment. We analyzed patient suggestions on how to make the VA more welcoming to women.MethodsWe surveyed a convenience sample of women veteran patients who visited 1 of 26 VA locations in August and September of 2017. Women veterans were invited to complete brief anonymous questionnaires that included questions about harassment experiences and feeling welcome at the VA, and an open-ended question about suggestions to make the VA more welcoming to women. We analyzed data from the open-ended question using the constant comparison method.ResultsAmong respondents (N = 1,303), 85% felt welcome at the VA. Overall, 29% answered the open-ended prompt for a total of 490 distinct responses: 260 comments and 230 suggestions. Comments included praise for the VA (67%) and stories about feeling uncomfortable or harassed in the VA (26%). Suggestions included those related to VA staff (31%), the environment of care (18%), additional resources for women veterans (18%), clinical services for women veterans (15%), changing men veterans’ behavior toward women veterans at the VA (5%), and making the treatment of women and men the same (5%).ConclusionsAlthough most women veterans felt welcome in the VA, patient-centered suggestions offer opportunities for making the VA more welcoming to women. Soliciting patient suggestions and increasing awareness of how feeling welcome is experienced by patients are first steps to health care settings becoming more inclusive.     

What Drives Women Veterans’ Trust in VA Healthcare Providers?

IntroductionLittle is known about women veterans’ trust in Veterans Affairs (VA) health care and what factors promote trust in VA providers. We examined provider behaviors and characteristics of women veterans associated with trust in their VA providers.MethodsWe used a 2015 survey of women veterans who were routine users of primary care at 12 VA medical centers (n = 1,395). Patient trust in their VA provider was measured on a seven-item scale. We used multiple logistic regression to examine associations of patient-provider communication and gender appropriateness with complete trust in VA provider (100 [complete trust] vs. <100 [less than complete trust]), controlling for patient characteristics.ResultsOn average, 39.7% of women veterans reported complete trust in their VA providers. Those with complete trust reported greater patient-provider communication and gender appropriateness of VA services than those with less-than-complete trust (all ps ≤ .001). In multiple logistic regression models, higher ratings of provider communication (adjusted odds ratio, 2.37), gender-appropriate care (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93), and trauma-sensitive communication (adjusted odds ratios, 1.79–6.08) were associated with a higher likelihood of reporting complete trust in their VA provider.ConclusionsWomen veterans reported high levels of trust in their VA providers. Provider communication, gender-appropriate care, and trauma-sensitive communication were associated with greater patient trust. Although it is important to highlight the steps already taken by VA to increase the quality of care for women veterans, current findings suggest that women veterans’ trust may be further increased by interventions to improve trauma-informed care by VA providers.     

Bridging the Gap for Perinatal Veterans: Care by Mental Health Providers at the Veterans Health Administration

BackgroundPregnant women veterans receive maternity care from community obstetricians but continue to receive mental health care within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Our objective was to explore the experiences of VHA mental health providers with pregnant and postpartum veterans.MethodsMental health providers (n = 33) were identified at 14 VHA facilities across the United States. Semistructured interviews were conducted over the phone to learn about provider experiences with perinatal women veterans and their perceptions of depression screening and mental health treatment management for pregnant and postpartum veterans receiving mental health care within the VHA system.FindingsProviders identified an absence of screening protocols and referral procedures and variability in risk/benefit conversations surrounding psychotropic medication use as important areas of weakness for VHA mental health care during the perinatal period. Care coordination within facilities, primarily through Primary Care-Mental Health Integration teams, was identified as a main facilitator to promoting better mental health care for perinatal veterans.ConclusionsMental health providers caring for veterans during the perinatal period identified several areas where care could be improved, notably in screening and referral processes. A refinement to current guidelines to specify standard screening tools, screening schedules, and referral processes could potentially engage a greater number of pregnant women in VHA mental health care.     

Discontinuity of Women Veterans’ Care in Patient-Centered Medical Homes: Does Workforce Gender Sensitivity Matter?

BackgroundPrior research has found that 25% of women veterans who are new to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system discontinue services within 3 years of initial use. Although it has been suggested that providing more gender-sensitive care might improve women veterans' health care experiences, no study has yet documented an empirical relationship between clinic and provider factors associated with the provision of gender-sensitive care and women veterans’ care discontinuity.MethodsSurveys of primary care providers (n = 82) and staff members (n = 108) from 12 VA medical centers were linked to administrative data for women veteran patients with at least one primary care visit in 2014 and 2015 (n = 9,958). Patient care discontinuity was operationalized as having no additional primary care visit within 3 years after the patient's baseline visit. Key indicators of gender-sensitive comprehensive primary care included type of medical home (women's health-focused vs. general primary care), workforce gender sensitivity, team functioning, perceived quality of provider/staff communication, leadership support for medical home implementation, and other structural components of care delivery (e.g., chaperone availability). We used logistic regression to assess the association between these indicators and women's care discontinuity, measuring discontinuity for both new and continuing VA users and controlling for patient characteristics.ResultsEleven percent of women patients discontinued primary care within 3 years. Poor workforce gender sensitivity (lowest quartile vs. top three quartiles) was significantly associated with higher odds of discontinuity (odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.57); other indicators were not associated with discontinuity.ConclusionsThis study is the first to document a relationship between workforce gender sensitivity and women veterans’ care continuity. This finding underscores the need for additional attention to enhancing workforce gender sensitivity in VA.     

Postsurgical Opioid Use Among Veterans Discharged to Skilled Care Facilities Compared to Veterans Discharged to Home After Orthopedic Surgery

ObjectivesTo compare opioid use patterns among Veterans who were discharged to a skilled care facility vs home after orthopedic surgery at a VA hospital.DesignWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of Veterans who had orthopedic surgery at the Salt Lake City VA Medical Center (VAMC) between January 2018 and December 2021 and were followed by a transitional pain service. The principal outcome of interest was the time to stop opioid use after discharge from the hospital.Setting and ParticipantsVeterans not already on chronic opioid therapy who had orthopedic surgery at the Salt Lake City VAMC and were followed by a transitional pain service.Methods448 patients were included in the study, of which 371 (83%) were discharged to home and 77 (17%) were discharged to a skilled care facility. Median days to opioid cessation were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with 95% CIs and compared with discharge disposition using a log-rank test. Time to opioid cessation following hospital discharge was compared to baseline characteristics using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsPatients who were discharged to a skilled care facility used opioids for twice as long as those who were discharged home [median days (interquartile range)]: 22 (19, 26) vs 11 (10, 12), P < .001, respectively. When controlling for baseline characteristics in the multivariable analysis, discharge to a skilled care facility was significantly associated with continued opioid use at all time points [hazard ratio 0.63 (95% CI 0.44, 0.89), P = .009].Conclusions and ImplicationsVeterans discharged to a skilled care facility after orthopedic surgery used opioids for twice as long as those who were discharged to home. As postsurgical pain management guidelines change to focus on nonopioid pain modalities and opioid reduction, skilled care providers should adapt those strategies for their facilities.     

Rejection of Care and Aggression among Older Veterans with Dementia: The Influence of Background Factors and Interpersonal Triggers

ObjectivesTo test relationships among background factors, interpersonal triggers, rejection of care, and aggression among veterans living with dementia in residential long-term care settings, based on the need-driven dementia-compromised behavior model.DesignA mixed methods secondary analysis of program evaluation data from the Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences-Veterans Health Administration intervention implemented by the US Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system.Setting and ParticipantsIn total, 315 older veterans who participated in the 2013‒2016 Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences-Veterans Health Administration program at 76 Community Living Centers (Veterans Affairs-operated nursing homes).MethodsText data that captured the interdisciplinary team observations of distressed behaviors of concern and their circumstances were coded into categorical variables and then combined with existing quantitative data to test hypothesized relationships using structural equation modeling.ResultsRejection of care was directly affected by interpersonal triggers (β = 0.32, P < .005) and background factors such as depression (β = 0.29, P < .018), anxiety (β = −0.18, P < .023), and cognitive status (β = 0.10, P < .049). Depression also had an indirect effect on rejection of care through interpersonal triggers (α × β = 0.13 × 0.32 = 0.04, P < .012). Aggression was directly affected by both interpersonal triggers (β = 0.19, P < .009) and functional status (β = 0.17, P < .011). Both function (α × β = 0.12 × 0.19 = 0.02, P < .035) and depression (α × β = 0.13 × 0.19 = 0.03, P < .005) had indirect effects on aggression through interpersonal triggers.Conclusions and ImplicationsInterpersonal triggers influenced rejection of care and aggression in veterans with dementia. Background factors such as depression and severity of functional impairment increased the likelihood of these symptoms. Study findings emphasize the importance of developing and implementing interventions that improve interpersonal relationships and developing targeted interventions for those with depressive symptoms.     

Coordinated-Transitional Care (C-TraC) for Veterans from Subacute Rehabilitation to Home

ObjectivesTo adapt a successful acute care transitional model to meet the needs of veterans transitioning from post-acute care to home.DesignQuality improvement intervention.Setting and ParticipantsVeterans discharged from a subacute care unit in the VA Boston Healthcare System's skilled nursing facility.MethodsWe used the Replicating Effective Programs framework and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to adapt the Coordinated-Transitional Care (C-TraC) program to the context of transitions from a VA subacute care unit to home. The major adaptation of this registered nurse–driven, telephone-based intervention was combining the roles of discharge coordinator and transitional care case manager. We report the details of the implementation, its feasibility, and results of process measures, and describe its preliminary impact.ResultsBetween October 2021 and April 2022, all 35 veterans who met eligibility criteria in the VA Boston Community Living Center (CLC) participated; none were lost to follow-up. The nurse case manager delivered core components of the calls with high fidelity—review of red flags, detailed medication reconciliation, follow-up with primary care physician, and discharge services were discussed and documented in 97.9%, 95.9%, 86.8%, and 95.9%, respectively. CLC C-TraC interventions included care coordination, patient and caregiver education, connecting patients to resources, and addressing medication discrepancies. Nine medication discrepancies were discovered in 8 patients (22.9%; average of 1.1 discrepancies per patient). Compared with a historical cohort of 84 veterans, more CLC C-TraC patients received a post-discharge call within 7 days (82.9% vs 61.9%; P = .03). There was no difference between rates of attendance to appointments and acute care admissions post-discharge.Conclusions and ImplicationsWe successfully adapted the C-TraC transitional care protocol to the VA subacute care setting. CLC C-TraC resulted in increased post-discharge follow-up and intensive case management. Evaluation of a larger cohort to determine its impact on clinical outcomes such as readmissions is warranted.     

Veterans Health Administration Screening for Military Sexual Trauma May Not Capture Over Half of Cases Among Midlife Women Veterans

BackgroundApproximately 1 in 3 women veterans endorse military sexual trauma (MST) during Veterans Health Administration (VHA) screening. Higher rates have been reported in anonymous surveys.ObjectiveWe compared MST identified by VHA screening to survey-reported MST within the same sample and identified participant characteristics associated with discordant responses.MethodsCross-sectional data were drawn from an observational study of women veterans aged 45–64 enrolled in VHA care in Northern California, with data from mail- and web-based surveys linked to VHA electronic health records (EHRs). Between March 2019 and May 2020, participants reported sociodemographic characteristics, current depressive (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and posttraumatic stress (PTSD checklist for DSM-5) symptoms, and MST (using standard VHA screening questions) in a survey; depression and posttraumatic stress disorder diagnoses (ICD-10 codes) and documented MST were identified from EHRs. Associations between sociodemographic characteristics, mental health symptoms and diagnoses, and discordant MST reports (EHR-documented MST vs. MST reported on survey, not in EHR) were examined with multivariable logistic regression.ResultsIn this sample of midlife women veterans (n = 202; mean age 56, SD = 5), 40% had EHR-documented MST, and 74% reported MST on the survey. Sociodemographic characteristics, mental health symptoms, and diagnosed depression were not associated with discordant MST responses. Women with an EHR-documented PTSD diagnosis had fivefold higher odds of having EHR-documented MST (vs. survey only; odds ratio 5.2; 95% confidence interval 2.3–11.9).ConclusionsVHA screening may not capture more than half of women who reported MST on the survey. VHA screening may underestimate true rates of MST, which could lead to a gap in recognition and care for women veterans.