A systematic chart review of the nature of psychiatric adverse events in children and adolescents treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

OBJECTIVE: Despite a rapidly growing literature on the efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) in the treatment of juvenile psychiatric disorders, relatively little is described about emotional, behavioral, and cognitive adverse effects associated with their use. To this end we completed a retrospective analysis of medical charts to determine the incidence, nature, and clinical correlates of treatment emergent adverse effects in the behavioral, cognitive, and emotional domains. METHODS: We systematically evaluated the medical charts of children treated with SSRI for depressive or obsessive-compulsive disorders for a mean (+/- SD) of 26.9 + 20.8 months to determine the incidence, nature, and clinical correlates of treatment emergent psychiatric adverse events (PAE). Charts were reviewed for diagnoses, type and dose of SSRI and adjunct medication, specific type of PAE, and time to onset and offset of PAE. RESULTS: In total, 82 charts of children and adolescents (mean age 12.2 +/- 3.2 years) were examined. PAE occurred in 22% of children and were most commonly related to disturbances in mood. PAE were not associated with psychiatric diagnosis(es), age, sex, concurrent medications, doses or specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The onset of PAE was observed typically 3 months after SSRI exposure (median = 91 days). Although PAE diminished with SSRI discontinuation, those that emerged early in treatment diminished significantly more rapidly than those that emerged later (median offset was 10 and 49 days, respectively). Re-exposure to an SSRI resulted in another PAE in 44% (n = 18) of the group. CONCLUSION: Based on the retrospective review of medical charts, youth receiving SSRI appear to be at risk for treatment emergent PAE and recurrence with re-exposure to an SSRI. Prospective longer term studies evaluating the course and prognosis of youths manifesting PAE to SSRI are necessary.     

The adverse skeletal effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are a widely used group of antidepressants (ADs) with reported potential detrimental effects on bone mineral density (BMD) and increased fracture risk. Here, a comprehensive review of the in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies to date was carried out using the medical search engines MEDLINE (1950 to September 2010) and EMBASE (1980 to September 2010). Serotonin (5-HT) receptors have been identified on osteoclast, osteoblast and osteocyte cell lines. The effect of SSRIs on bone formation and resorption appears to be governed by the activation of a number of 5-HT receptors on osteoblasts and osteoclasts via endocrine, autocrine/paracrine and neuronal pathways. In vitro, in vivo and clinical collective data appears to indicate that SSRIs have a negative effect on bone at the therapeutic dose levels widely used for the treatment of depression in current clinical practice. Caution may therefore have to be employed with the use of SSRIs in patients at an increased risk of falls and osteoporosis. Further studies are needed in order to fully elicit the role of SSRIs in bone formation and their effects in the low oestrogen state.     

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for children and adolescents

The controlled studies of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in pediatric psychopharmacology research lag behind the controlled studies of SSRIs in adults. As a result, widespread use of SSRIs in the treatment of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders is in stark contrast to the paucity of research data. Recent changes in the research climate (including support from the National Institute of Mental Health, the Food and Drug Administration, and industry) have encouraged welldesigned SSRI studies in pediatric psychopharmacology, and will ultimately provide needed information to guide treatment. This paper reviews the best available data from pediatric SSRI trials, including 10 double-blind placebo-controlled trials, and two abstracts of open-label continuation studies of SSRIs associated with large pediatric efficacy studies. Adverse events (AEs) of SSRIs in children and adolescents are discussed in reference to available pediatric studies. Recent pharmacokinetic studies of SSRIs in children and adolescents are reviewed. Future SSRI research strategies are also discussed.     

Amotivational syndrome associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in children and adolescents.

A frontal lobe syndrome has previously been reported in adults treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), but not in children. Five typical cases of apathy and lack of motivation, one accompanied by disinhibition, are described in a child and four adolescents. Symptoms were dose related and reversible. The subtlety of symptoms, lack of insight in patients, disabling effects, and delayed onset indicate a need for clinicians to inform families of these potential symptoms when SSRIs are prescribed.     

团体归因治疗与选择性5-羟色胺回收抑制剂对血浆脑源性神经营养因子的作用

目的:比较团体归因治疗(ARGT)与选择性5-羟色胺回收抑制剂(SSRI)对抑郁症、焦虑症、强迫症患者血浆脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)的作用.方法:采用ARGT与SSRI对照的前瞻性干预研究设计,根据就诊顺序将129例门诊患者(其中抑郁症45例、焦虑症45例、强迫症39例)分至ARGT组63例(其中抑郁症21例、焦虑...     

Escitalopram versus serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Escitalopram has shown some different pharmacologic properties compared to its racemic molecule, citalopram. When comparing with venlafaxine, similar efficacy of this drug was observed, notably when considering the frequency of responders [50% of decrease on the Montgomery and Asberg Depression rating Scale (MADRS)] and the frequency of remitters (MADRS<12), even when the doses of both drugs were increased up to 20 mg per day for escitalopram and 225 mg per day for venlafaxine. In addition, a recent study conducted by Jonas et al. (2006) [Jonas J, Bose A, Alexopoulos G, et al. Double blind comparison of escitalopram and duloxetine in the acute treatment of Major Depressive Disorder 45th Annual Meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology December 2006] suggested a better efficacy of escitalopram in comparison to duloxetine. When considering severe major depressive episodes, the efficacy of escitalopram compared to noradrenalin and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (NaSRI) could be superior, with a more important rate of remitters in the escitalopram group. Regarding the tolerance of both types of drugs, the percentage of patients who withdrew the drug for side-effects would be higher in patients on venlafaxine. This increase in frequency of side-effects has been observed in different studies conducted with venlafaxine and duloxetine. All these data highlight the advantages of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive episodes and escitalopram has, therefore, obtained marketing approval in France with some specific mentions in favour of this drug.     

Hyponatraemia and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Part 1 describes the case of a 74-year-old woman who experienced a worsening of her psychiatric condition shortly after commencing fluoxetine and was found to have a low serum sodium level. The clinical features of hyponatraemia and its causes are reviewed. Part 2 reviews the reports of hyponatraemia and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and considers the variation in reports between the different SSRIs. Measurement of a patient's electrolytes is recommended if there is a rapid decline in mental state having started on an SSRI.     

Tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in thirty-nine children under age seven: a retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the adverse effects of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) started in children under age 7 yr. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for all children who had begun treatment with an SSRI under age 7 at an academic psychiatry department in Boston. RESULTS: Thirty-nine children (26 males, 13 females) met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at start of treatment was 5.9 +/- 0.8 yr, and median treatment duration was 5.0 months. The target diagnoses for SSRI treatment were anxiety disorders in 54%, depressive disorders in 23%, and both anxiety and depressive disorders in 20% of patients. There were no reports of suicidal ideation or attempt. No children were medically or psychiatrically hospitalized for adverse effects (AEs). Eleven patients (28%) reported an AE of at least moderate severity; 7 (18%) discontinued the SSRI due to the AE. Six patients discontinued due to behavioral activation and 1 due to gastrointestinal upset. The median time to onset of an AE was 23 days, and median resolution was 19 days from onset. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of adverse effects, especially activation, in this sample argues for continued caution in using SSRIs in young children. Controlled trials are warranted.     

Cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for major depression in children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE: To assess from a health sector perspective the incremental cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in children and adolescents, compared to "current practice". METHOD: The health benefit is measured as a reduction in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), based on effect size calculations from meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. An assessment on second stage filter criteria ("equity", "strength of evidence", "feasibility" and "acceptability to stakeholders") is also undertaken to incorporate additional factors that impact on resource allocation decisions. Costs and benefits are tracked for the duration of a new episode of MDD arising in eligible children (age 6-17 years) in the Australian population in the year 2000. Simulation-modelling techniques are used to present a 95% uncertainty interval (UI) around the cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: Compared to current practice, CBT by public psychologists is the most cost-effective intervention for MDD in children and adolescents at A$9000 per DALY saved (95% UI A$3900 to A$24 000). SSRIs and CBT by other providers are less cost-effective but likely to be less than A$50 000 per DALY saved (> 80% chance). CBT is more effective than SSRIs in children and adolescents, resulting in a greater total health benefit (DALYs saved) than could be achieved with SSRIs. Issues that require attention for the CBT intervention include equity concerns, ensuring an adequate workforce, funding arrangements and acceptability to various stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive behavioural therapy provided by a public psychologist is the most effective and cost-effective option for the first-line treatment of MDD in children and adolescents. However, this option is not currently accessible by all patients and will require change in policy to allow more widespread uptake. It will also require "start-up" costs and attention to ensuring an adequate workforce.     

Acute neural effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors on emotion processing: Implications for differential treatment efficacy

Clinical research has demonstrated differential efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NRIs), which may relate to differential acute effects these medications have on emotional brain processes. Here we present findings from a Multi-Level Kernel Density Analysis meta-analysis that integrates and contrasts activations from disparate fMRI studies in order to examine whether single dose SSRIs and NRIs have different effects on emotion processing tasks in healthy participants. Seven SSRI and four NRI studies were eligible for inclusion. SSRIs decreased amygdala responses, suggesting reduced emotional reactivity to emotional stimuli, whereas NRIs increased frontal and medial activation, suggesting increased emotion regulation. As hypothesised, an interaction of antidepressant and task type was found, such that SSRIs modulated amygdaloid-hippocampal, medial and frontal activity during both the presentation of faces and pictures, whereas NRIs only modulated the activation in medial and frontal regions during the presentation of pictures. Findings are interpreted within a novel model of the differential effects of SSRIs and NRIs on emotion processing.     

Clozapine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: risks of toxicity

A 25-year-old woman, known to have schizoaffective disorder, presented with symptoms that had arisen a few weeks earlier. The symptoms indicated that she had a toxic clozapine blood level. The probable cause of the toxicity was a pharmacokinetic interaction between citalopram and clozapine at the level of the cytochrome P450 system. A literature search reveals the importance of monitoring the interactions between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and clozapine, a procedure which should, if possible, be accompanied by blood level measurements. Caution is called for, particularly when non-smokers are involved.     

The influence of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on human platelet serotonin

Clinical depression has been proposed to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. While it is suggested that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) reduce the risk of acute cardiovascular problems of depressed patients, the effect of SSRIs on platelets, the only blood cells committed to serotonin (5-HT) transport, remains largely unknown.The goal of this pilot study was to measure the 5-HT levels in platelets of untreated and SSRI-treated depressed patients and normal subjects and to determine whether the interaction of SSRIs with platelets can explain their possible cardiovascular benefit in patients with depression. Platelet 5-HT was determined by an immunocytochemical assay and high-pressure liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC-ECD). In normal control subjects without cardiovascular disease, 78 +/- 8% of platelets were 5-HT-positive (n = 14). Depression caused a significant reduction in platelet 5-HT to 46 +/- 21% in untreated patients (n = 13) and 22 +/- 13% in SSRI-treated patients (n = 14). As a class, all selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors significantly reduced the 5-HT concentration in patient platelets. An inverse relationship of 5-HT level and dose of medication might be suggested.These results correlated well with 5-HT data from HPLC (r = 0.8509, p < 0.001). SSRIs did not affect platelet aggregation and dense granule release in response to thrombin, but significantly reduced ADP-induced platelet aggregation and dense granule release in both patient and normal control samples. The active inhibition of platelet aggregation by SSRIs might explain their cardiovascular benefit.     

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors controversy in the treatment of depression in children

Antidepressants are widely prescribed for children and adolescents, although data regarding their safety and efficacy are limited. The objective of this article is to review the origins of the controversy regarding the current use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in children and adolescents. Two chief concerns drive the controversy: 1) the discovery of an increased risk of suicidal behaviors in those treated with SSRIs and 2) the efficacy of SSRIs in childhood and adolescent major depression is unclear. Various factors may account for the reported differences in outcomes for SSRI treatment in children and adolescents compared to adults. The past decade has shown a significant drop in the rate of adolescent suicide, which coincides with the onset of the use of these medications. Therefore, a reduction in the use of SSRIs in children and adolescents should be considered carefully.