Bloc sciatique en médecine préhospitalière

Objectives

Evaluate the analgesic efficiency of the sciatic nerve block in prehospital care at the time of some severe legs or feet traumas.

Patients and methods

Retrospective, monocentric study upon a period of time 1998–2008.

Results

Twenty-three sciatic nerve blocks have been colligated, five by upper way and heighten by lateral popliteal lower way among which fourteen without neurostimulator. The pain decrease evaluated by the EVS at T0 (before block), T1 (10 min after block) and T2 (arriving in emergency department), has been significative, whatever the measure time interval (T0–T1, T0–T2, T1–T2), the ways used and the local anaesthetics given. The analgesia installation was faster when approaching the sciatic nerve block by the upper way and when using a neurostimulator. Only one analgesic failure was observed while doing a lateral popliteal way without neurostimulator. Any complication was reported.

Conclusion

The sciatic nerve block done in prehospital shows a significant analgesic efficiency which would worth a deeper evaluation and a thought on its introduction in the ED physician's therapeutic gear.     

Tribloc (fémoral,sciatique, obturateur) pour la chirurgie ambulatoire arthroscopique de genou : étude prospective de faisabilité et d’efficacité

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate intra- and postoperative conditions of the triple nerve block technique (femoral, obturator, sciatic block) for outpatient knee arthrsopic procedures.

Methods

After written informed consent, ASA I-III patients received a combined triple nerve block with 30–40 ml lidocaine or mepivacaine (1,5%). Blocks were performed using a nerve stimulation technique. Onset time, block failure, supplemental general anesthesia (GA) or analgesia and pain score were recorded intraoperatively. After surgery, side effects (at days 0, 1, 3, 7 and after 4 weeks), patient and surgeon satisfactions were noted.

Results

Three hundred and twelve patients were screened and 115 triple blocks were performed (157 choosed GA, 19 spinal anaesthesia, 21 exclusion for regional anaesthesia). Failed blocks occurred for 12 (10%) patients. These 12 patients received GA before surgery incision. Time to complete block was 40 (10–60) min. Supplemental GA was required for 12 patients (12%) due to surgical (n = 7, 7%) or tourniquet (n = 5, 5%) pain. Intraoperative surgeon satisfaction was 90 (60–100). After surgery, time to discharge the postoperative care unit was 15 (5–60) min. Pain score at rest (Visual Analog Scale) until six hours was less than 30 /100, without any additionnal morphine. Two patients (< 2%) failed for ambulatory discharge criteria (no relation with triple block). At day 0, 3, 5% patients suffered PONV (8% at D1), paresthesia was noted in 1.7% at D0 (0,8% D3). No other secondary effects were observed after seven days and 91% patients “would like same anaesthesia” for next surgery.

Conclusion

We conclude that triple nerve block provided reliable intraoperative patient and surgical conditions for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Failed block (10%) was the major reason of supplemental anaesthesia. To increase surgical turn over under triple nerve block, a preoperative room may be required (block onset time).     

Postoperative pain management in pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: The role of intercostal block

Purpose

There are no published data regarding value of intercostal block following pectus excavatum repair. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of intercostal block in children following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE).

Methods

Forty-five patients given patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine postoperatively were studied. Twenty-six patients were given bilateral intercostal blocks after induction of anesthesia (PCA-IB group), and nineteen patients were retrospective controls without regional blockade (PCA group). All patients were followed up 24 h postoperatively.

Results

A loading dose of morphine (0,1 ± 0,49 mg/kg) before starting PCA was used in seventeen patients in PCA group vs. no patient in PCA-IB group. Cumulative used morphine doses were lower up to 12 h after surgery in PCA-IB group (0,29 ± 0,08 μg/kg) than in the PCA group (0,46 ± 0,18 μg/kg), p < 0,01. There were no differences in pain scores, oxygen saturation values, sedation scores, and the incidence of pulmonary adverse events between the two groups. There was a tendency towards less morphine-related adverse effects in PCA-IB group compared to PCA group (p < 0,05). No complications related to the intercostal blocks were observed.

Conclusion

Bilateral intercostal blocks following MIRPE are safe and easy to perform and can diminish postoperative opioid requirement. Double-blind randomized study is required to confirm the potential to diminish opioid related side effects.     

Bloqueio dos nervos ílio‐hipogástrico/ilioinguinal em correção de hérnia inguinal para tratamento da dor no pós‐operatório: comparação entre a técnica de marcos anatômicos e a guiada por ultrassom

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve blocks performed with the ultrasound guided and the anatomical landmark techniques for postoperative pain management in cases of adult inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Methods

40 patients, ASA I–II status were randomized into two groups equally: in Group AN (anatomical landmark technique) and in Group ultrasound (ultrasound guided technique), iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block was performed with 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine prior to surgery with the specified techniques. Pain score in postoperative assessment, first mobilization time, duration of hospital stay, score of postoperative analgesia satisfaction, opioid induced side effects and complications related to block were assessed for 24 h postoperatively.

Results

VAS scores at rest in the recovery room and all the clinical follow‐up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (p < 0.01 or p < 0.001). VAS scores at movement in the recovery room and all the clinical follow‐up points were found significantly less in Group ultrasound (p < 0.001 in all time points). While duration of hospital stay and the first mobilization time were being found significantly shorter, analgesia satisfaction scores were found significantly higher in ultrasound Group (p < 0.05, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively).

Conclusion

According to our study, US guided iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block in adult inguinal herniorrhaphies provides a more effective analgesia and higher satisfaction of analgesia than iliohypogastric/ilioinguinal nerve block with the anatomical landmark technique. Moreover, it may be suggested that the observation of anatomical structures with the US may increase the success of the block, and minimize the block‐related complications.     

Enquête de pratique sur l’analgésie péridurale en dehors de l’obstétrique

Objectives

To describe the current use of epidural anesthesia (EA) apart from obstetrics, and to explain the reasons of its low utilization.

Study design

Observational study.

Methods

A survey of practice with a self-questionnaire was sent by e-mail and available on Internet. Answers were compared between groups doing or not an epidural analgesia with exact Fisher tests (P < 0.05 statistically significant).

Results

Among the 176 anesthesiologists who answered to the questionnaire, only 21.4% never used epidural analgesia. The main reasons were alternatives therapeutics such as PCA with opioids or TAP block (24/38 vs. 46/140). TAP block was the most common alternative used by more than 50% of anesthesiologists. Loss of competence (4/30 vs. 0/39) was rarely the reason to its low utilization. The low accessibility to specialized postoperative units was recognized in both groups as a limiting factor to do an epidural but not the fear of neurological complications. Those who never perform epidural analgesia were statistically more often physicians between 40 and 50 years (12/38 vs. 19/140). Heparin, aspirin and clopidogrel are no longer contraindications according to anesthesiologists less than 40 years old (50/68 vs. 31/68; 44/68 vs. 31/68; 37/68 vs. 23/68 respectively) but not for older.

Conclusions

Epidural analgesia is performed more often by younger anesthesiologists. This survey suggests the need of specific postoperative area to allow anesthesiologist to perform and supervise safely this technique. Recommendations of the French society of Anesthesiologists are also poorly applied.     

Internet remote control of pump settings for postoperative continuous peripheral nerve blocks: A feasibility study in 59 patients

Introduction

During continuous peripheral nerve blocks, infusion adjustments are essential for postoperative analgesia without side effects. Beside, physicians and nurse visits related to pump's settings and monitoring are time consuming and costly. We hypothesized that a remote control of pump's settings, by telemedicine transmission, adjusted to patients’ feedbacks, is feasible and interesting in optimizing patient's postoperative pain management.

Methods

Fifty-nine ASA physical status I and II patients were included. Ropivacaine 0.2% was infused during 72 h in CPNB catheters. After returning to the surgical ward, the patient was allowed to answer a 10 indicators questionnaire 3 times a day (8.00 AM, 2.00 PM, 8.00 PM), or unlimited on patient's demand. This information was transmitted from the pump to a server through the Internet. If one indicator was out of the predefined thresholds, the anesthesiologist in charge was immediately informed by texto on his cell phone. The anesthesiologist connected to the website, checked the data from the patient and modified the settings of the pump by remote control according to a written protocol. The changes need a secure access with a password and a confirmation. The number of settings changes, the time to realize the procedure and the adverse events related to the technique were noted. When the catheter was removed, the pump was unassigned to the patient and the data archived.

Results

Thirty sciatic, 24 femoral and 5 interscalene catheters were inserted in 59 patients. Five catheters were accidentally removed before the end of the 72-h period. The median VAS pain values at rest and during movement were respectively at 2 and 3. Sixteen patients complained about numbness promoting 2 (0–3) changes in pump settings; 9 about motor blockade with 1 (0–2) change; 5 about difficulties for physiotherapy with 1 (0–3) change. The mean time of pump settings modification after response to questionnaire or voluntarily patient's alert was 15 ± 2.2 minutes. Early physiotherapy in the surgical ward was totally uneventful in 54 patients. The mean value of satisfaction scale of the patients was 8.4 ± 1.6. No adverse event necessitated a postoperative analgesia technique change.

Conclusion

Remote control pump's feedbacks and e-settings for postoperative analgesia using CPNB permitted a real adaptation to patients’ needs, complaints and pain VAS values without nurse and physician physical intervention.     

Effet d’une dose unique intramusculaire de déxaméthasone sur la douleur après circoncision. Étude randomisée contrôlée

Objective

To assess the effect of a preoperative single dose of dexamethasone associated with penile block on pain after circumcision.

Study design

Prospective randomized controlled study.

Patients and methods

Forty male children aged 2 to 5 years, scheduled for circumcision under general anaesthesia, combined with penile block, were randomized into two groups. The dexamethasone group received dexamethasone 0.4 mg/kg preoperatively. The control group received the same volume of normal saline. Data compared between two groups were: postoperative pain assessed by the Objective Pain Scale collected in the recovery room, at 8 and 24 hours postoperatively (h0, h8 and h24), time to first analgesic request and the quality of sleep on the first postoperative night.

Results

Pain scores at h0 were similar between the two groups. The dexamethasone group showed significantly lower pain scores at h8 [0 (0–1) vs. 2 (0–3); P = 0.04] and h24 [0 (0–0) vs. 0 (0–1); P = 0.02]. The time to first analgesic administration was also significantly delayed in the dexamethasone group compared to the control group (240 vs 180 min; P = 0.035). The quality of sleep was also better in children in the dexamethasone group (P = 0.018).

Conclusion

This study showed that the combination of a preoperative single dose of dexamethasone 0.4 mg/kg with penile block significantly improves the quality of analgesia after circumcision.     

Estudo comparativo,randômico e duplo‐cego de petidina e cetoprofeno como adjuvantes de lidocaína em anestesia regional intravenosa

Background and objectives

A review of all the adjuncts for intravenous regional anaesthesia concluded that there is good evidence to recommend NonSteroidal Anti‐Inflammatory agents and pethidine in the dose of 30 mg dose as adjuncts to intravenous regional anaesthesia. But there are no studies to compare pethidine of 30 mg dose to any of the NonSteroidal Anti‐Inflammatory agents.

Methods

In a prospective, randomized, double blind study, 45 patients were given intravenous regional anaesthesia with either lignocaine alone or lignocaine with pethidine 30 mg or lignocaine with ketprofen 100 mg. Fentanyl was used as rescue analgesic during surgery. For the first 6 h of postoperative period analgesia was provided by fentanyl injection and between 6 and 24 h analgesia was provided by diclofenac tablets. Visual analogue scores for pain and consumption of fentanyl and diclofenac were compared.

Results

The block was inadequate for one case each in lignocaine group and pethidine group, so general anaesthesia was provided. Time for the first dose of fentanyl required for postoperative analgesia was significantly more in pethidine and ketoprofen groups compared to lignocaine group (156.7 ± 148.8 and 153.0 ± 106.0 vs. 52.1 ± 52.4 min respectively). Total fentanyl consumption in first 6 h of postoperative period was less in pethidine and ketoprofen groups compared to lignocaine group (37.5 ± 29.0 mcg, 38.3 ± 20.8 mcg vs. 64.2 ± 27.2 mcg respectively). Consumption of diclofenac tablets was 2.4 ± 0.7, 2.5 ± 0.5 and 2.0 ± 0.7 in the control, pethidine and ketoprofen group respectively, which was statistically not significant. Side effects were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusion

Both pethidine and ketoprofen are equally effective in providing postoperative analgesia up to 6 h, without significant difference in the side effects and none of the adjuncts provide significant analgesia after 6 h.     

Anesthésie infiltrative tumescente et mastectomie : à propos de six cas

Objective

To assess safety and efficacy of tumescent infiltration of the supraclavicular nerve and the anterior and lateral branches of the intercostal nerves in major breast surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of six selected patients undergoing mastectomy was performed. A mixture composed of 150 mg ropivacaine, 400 mg of lidocaine and 0.5 mg epinephrine diluted in 500 ml Ringer's were administered subcutaneously as follows: 80 ml along the parasternal line from the second to the sixth intercostal space, 80 ml along the mid axillary line from the second to the sixth intercostal space, 80 ml along the infraclavicular line, 80 ml in the space between the pectoralis muscle and the mammary gland and 80 ml in the axilla in case of axillary dissection.

Results

This technique achieved effective analgesia in six patients associated with sedation or light anaesthesia; conversion to general anaesthesia or supplementation with local anaesthesia was not required. No complication was observed. No emesis was noted.

Conclusion

This technique provides adequate peroperative analgesia and is a technically low-risk procedure. Further evaluation of this technique is recommended.     

Femoral and sciatic nerve block for hindfoot and ankle surgery

Background

The use of regional anesthesia, such as ankle block or sciatic nerve block, has gained in popularity due to considerations of patient comfort and safety in foot and ankle surgery. However, if the operation extends above the midfoot or if a thigh tourniquet is required, general or spinal anesthesia is needed. The authors aimed to determine by prospective study whether a ‘double block’, involving femoral and sciatic nerve blocks, is advantageous under such conditions.

Materials and methods

The effectiveness of a preoperative double block was prospectively evaluated in 26 consecutive patients undergoing a variety of foot and ankle procedures, compared with 32 patients with sciatic nerve block alone. Time of analgesia onset, length of block coverage, and complications were noted. Degree of pain was measured using VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores at the operation, just after surgery, and at 2 h, 1 day, and 2 days after surgery.

Results

The surgical procedures performed under double block were ankle arthroscopy and medial ankle ligament reconstruction, and Achilles tendon repair, and the following conditions were treated; surgery for medial ankle fracture, ankle fusion, subtalar fusion, and surgery for hindfoot diseases, such as, talocalcaneal coalition. The average time required to analgesia onset was 63 min for a double block and 61 min for sciatic nerve block alone. Analgesia time lasted 12.0 h for a double block and 12.4 h for sciatic nerve block alone. Average VAS scores at the operation and immediately after the operation were 0.03 (range 0–1) and 0.16 (range 0–2) for sciatic nerve block, and 0.35 (range, 0–4), 0.31 (range 0–2) for double block. Average VAS scores at 2 h, 1 day, and 2 days postoperatively were 0.28 (range, 0–2), 2.16 (range 0–6), and 1.63 (range 0–5) for sciatic nerve block, and 0.42 (range 0–5), 2.27 (range 0–7), and 1.72 (range 0–8), respectively, for double block.

Conclusion

The results of this prospective study suggest that double block provides good surgical anesthesia and good postoperative pain control for hindfoot and ankle surgery.     

Analgésie péridurale continue versus bloc continu du compartiment psoas pour l’analgésie postopératoire après chirurgie majeure du bassin ou du fémur chez l’enfant : étude prospective comparative randomisée

Background

Intravenous opioids and/or continuous epidural block (CEB) are used for postoperative analgesia after hip and/or femoral shaft surgery but adverse effects limit their use in children. A continuous psoas compartment block (CPCB), effective technique in adults can be an alternative. In this randomized comparative study, we wanted to evaluate CEB and CPCB in children after major hip surgery in terms of adverse events, pain relief and ropivacaine plasma concentrations.

Methods

After ethical committee and parents’ approval, 40 children scheduled for hip surgery were included and randomly allocated to receive CPCB or CEB. After general anaesthesia induction, 0.5 mL/kg of 0.375% ropivacaine were injected via the epidural or lumbar plexus catheter. After surgery, 0.1 ml/kg per hour (group CPCB) or 0.2 ml/kg per hour (group CEB) of 0.2% ropivacaine was infused for 48 h. Post-operative pain was evaluated using VAS or CHIPPS scores values at h1, h6, h12, h18, h24, h36 and h48, as well as doses of first line (paracetamol 15 mg/kg/6 h) or second line rescue analgesia (0.2 mg/kg intravenous nalbuphine), if pain score remained high after 30 mm. niflumic acid was systematically used. Adverse events were noted as well as parents’ satisfaction at 48 h. Ropivacaine plasma concentrations were measured four times up to 48 h (h1, h6, h24 and h48) by high performance gas chromatography.

Results

Forty children 1 to 12 years old (CPCB = 20, CEB = 20) were included. The demographic data were equivalent in both groups. Postoperative analgesia was excellent for both continuous block techniques during the whole studied period. Doses of rescue analgesics were comparable in both groups at the end of the 48 h. Number of children who had at least one side effect is significantly higher in CEB group. Furthermore, the number of local anaesthetic premature stops was significantly more frequent in this group. Median values of ropivacaine plasma level in CEB group were significantly higher than CPCB group at h6 and h24. Ten parents in the CEB group and 15 in CPCB group were satisfied.

Conclusion

Continuous psoas compartment block is an effective technique of postoperative analgesia after major hip or femoral surgery in children. It equally manages postoperative pain with significantly less adverse event and decreased ropivacaine doses and plasma concentration than CEB.     

Identification du risque de douleur chronique après hépatectomie pour don de foie par les trajectoires de douleur

Objectives

To assess pain trajectories in predicting risk of chronic postoperative pain (CPP) after liver resection for living donor transplantation.

Study design

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing liver resection for living donor transplantation during 3 years.

Patients and methods

After recording perioperative data, patients presenting CPP at 3 months were separated from patients without postsurgical pain problem in order to build a pain trajectory for liver donor patients without CPP. Postoperative course of liver donors with CPP was then compared to that standard pain trajectory.

Results

Sixty-five patients (30 females, 35 males) were included. Epidural analgesia was used in 66%; others received autocontrolled analgesia by morphine. Severe acute pain was expressed by 11% and 37% at rest and movement respectively on the first day. Chronic pain involved six patients without any link with gender or type of analgesia. Analysis of pain trajectories shown that these patients presented either higher initial pain at day 1 or positive slopes with worsening of pain.

Conclusion

Acute postoperative pain is a risk factor of developing CPP. Identification of those people by pain trajectories can be useful to treat them early.     

A double-blinded, randomized comparison of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block

To compare intraoperative and postoperative clinical properties of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block, 50 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing hallux valgus repair received a femoral nerve block with 15 mL of 2% mepivacaine. They were then randomly allocated in a double-blinded fashion to receive a sciatic nerve block with either 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25). An independent blinded observer evaluated the onset time of surgical anesthesia as well as the quality of the surgical block and postoperative analgesia. The median (range) onset time of surgical block at the sciatic nerve distribution was 30 min (5-60 min) with levobupivacaine and 15 min (5-60 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.63). Four patients (two patients in each group) received a supplementary ankle block by the surgeon just before the beginning of surgery. All four patients also received IV fentanyl supplementation, but in three of them, propofol infusion was required to complete surgery (two in the Levobupivacaine group [8%] and one in the Ropivacaine group [4%]; P = 0.99). In six patients of the Levobupivacaine group (24%) and five patients of the Ropivacaine group (20%), IV fentanyl supplementation was required to complete surgery (P = 0.99). No differences in the time to recovery of sensory and motor function were observed between the two groups, whereas median (range) duration of postoperative analgesia was 16 h (8-24 h) with levobupivacaine and 16 h (8-24 h) with ropivacaine (P = 0.83). We conclude that 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine provide comparable surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. IMPLICATIONS: No studies have compared the clinical properties of levobupivacaine with those of ropivacaine when providing sciatic nerve block for hallux valgus repair. Results from this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study demonstrate that 20 mL of either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine provide comparable surgical block with prolonged postoperative analgesia.     

Infusão intraoperatória de esmolol reduz o consumo pós‐operatório de analgésicos e o uso de anestésico durante a septorrinoplastia: estudo randômico

Background and objectives

Esmolol is known to have no analgesic activity and no anaesthetic properties; however, it could potentiate the reduction in anaesthetic requirements and reduce postoperative analgesic use. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of intravenous esmolol infusion on intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumptions as well as its effect on depth of anaesthesia.

Method

This randomized‐controlled double blind study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital between March and June 2010. Sixty patients undergoing septorhinoplasty were randomized into two groups. History of allergy to drugs used in the study, ischaemic heart disease, heart block, bronchial asthma, hepatic or renal dysfunction, obesity and a history of chronic use of analgesic or β‐blockers were considered cause for exclusion from the study. Thirty patients received esmolol and remifentanil (esmolol group) and 30 patients received normal saline and remifentanil (control group) as an intravenous infusion during the procedure. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and bispectral index values were recorded every 10 min. Total remifentanil consumption, visual analogue scale scores, time to first analgesia and total postoperative morphine consumption were recorded.

Results

The total remifentanil consumption, visual analogue scale scores at 0, 20 and 60 min, total morphine consumption, time to first analgesia and the number of patients who needed an intravenous morphine were lower in the esmolol group.

Conclusions

Intravenous infusion of esmolol reduced the intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption, reduced visual analogue scale scores in the early postoperative period and prolonged the time to first analgesia; however it did not influence the depth of anaesthesia.     

Perioperative epidural analgesia in children undergoing major abdominal tumor surgery — a single center experience

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the use of continuous epidural analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing major abdominal tumor surgery.

Methods

Children undergoing major abdominal tumor surgery at our institution between 2008 and 2012 (n = 40) received continuous epidural analgesia via an epidural catheter. Surgical trauma scores, pain scores, and clinical data of the children were compared to a pair-matched historical control group operated on between 2002 and 2007 without epidural analgesia.

Results

Pain levels in the study group on day 1 and 3 after surgery were lower compared to the control group. The differences did, however, not reach statistical significance (p = 0.15 and 0.09). Children in the study group received significantly fewer additional doses of piritramide or morphine (45% versus 82%, p < 0.001). Despite significantly higher surgical trauma scores in the study group (p = 0.018), there were no statistical differences regarding clinical parameters, such as mechanical ventilation time, time on intensive care unit, and total hospital stay. There were no catheter-related complications.

Conclusions

Continuous epidural analgesia is beneficial for children undergoing complex abdominal tumor surgery with regard to pain levels, postoperative recovery, and general clinical course. Expertise of the managing team, a careful patient selection, and a continuous quality assessment are essential for success.     

Systematic review of the effects of fascia iliaca compartment block on hip fracture patients before operation

Background

Fascia iliaca compartment block is used for hip fractures in order to reduce pain, the need for systemic analgesia, and prevent delirium, on this basis. This systematic review was conducted to investigate the analgesic and adverse effects of fascia iliaca block on hip fracture in adults when applied before operation.

Epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia following minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/Purpose

The minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair (MIPER) is a painful procedure. The ideal approach to postoperative analgesia is debated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia compared to intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) following MIPER.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE (1946–2012) and the Cochrane Library (inception–2012) for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and cohort studies comparing epidural analgesia to PCA for postoperative pain management in children following MIPER. We calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) for numeric pain scores and summarized secondary outcomes qualitatively.

Results

Of 699 studies, 3 RCTs and 3 retrospective cohorts met inclusion criteria. Compared to PCA, mean pain scores were modestly lower with epidural immediately (WMD − 1.04, 95% CI − 2.11 to 0.03, p = 0.06), 12 hours (WMD − 1.12; 95% CI − 1.61 to − 0.62, p < 0.001), 24 hours (WMD − 0.51, 95%CI − 1.05 to 0.02, p = 0.06), and 48 hours (WMD − 0.85, 95% CI − 1.62 to − 0.07, p = 0.03) after surgery. We found no statistically significant differences between secondary outcomes.

Conclusions

Epidural analgesia may provide superior pain control but was comparable with PCA for secondary outcomes. Better designed studies are needed. Currently the analgesic technique should be based on patient preference and institutional resources.