International society of urological pathology consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens

The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens issued recommendations for standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. The conference addressed specimen handling, T2 substaging, prostate cancer volume, extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node metastases, and surgical margins. This review summarizes the conclusions and recommendations resulting from the consensus process.     

Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma

Scant data are available comparing sampling methods of radical prostatectomy specimens performed for clinical stage T1c (nonpalpable) cancer. Seventy-eight stage T1c radical prostatectomies that had 1 or more of the following adverse pathologic findings-Gleason score > or = 7, positive margins, and extraprostatic extension-were compared using 10 different sampling techniques. Of the 78 entirely submitted cases, 52 had Gleason score > or = 7, 14 had positive margins, and 54 had extraprostatic extension (mean 34 slides). Of the partial sampling methods, we favor the following two methods. The first is submitting every posterior section plus 1 midanterior section from right and left sides; if either of these anterior sections show sizeable tumor, all ipsilateral anterior slides are examined. This method detects 98% of tumors with Gleason score > or = 7, 100% of positive margins, and 96% of cases with extraprostatic extension (mean 27 slides). The second method is to use the above method but restrict it to sections ipsilateral to the previous positive needle biopsy. This method detects 92% of tumors with Gleason score > or = 7, 93% of positive margins, and 85% of cases with extraprostatic extension (mean 17 slides). Partial sampling can detect important prognostic parameters. By balancing the extra expense and time involved to process and examine additional sections with the risk of missing important prognostic parameters, pathologists can decide which sampling method to use.     

The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens

The presence of positive surgical margins is a negative prognostic indicator in patients undergoing prostatectomy for prostate cancer; whether the extent of the positive margins affects the clinical outcome with regards to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence remains uncertain. We evaluated the linear extent of margin positivity as a prognostic indicator in a series of radical prostatectomy specimens. One hundred seventy-four consecutive margin-positive prostatectomy specimens were evaluated. The linear extent of margin positivity was measured with an ocular micrometer and ranged from 0.05 to 75.0 mm (mean, 8.94; median, 5.0). The linear extent of margin positivity was associated with tumor volume (P = .03) but was not associated with patients' age at surgery, preoperative PSA level, prostate weight, pathologic stage, Gleason score, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, perineural invasion, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or PSA recurrence. In the full model multiple Cox regression, significant predictors for PSA recurrence were Gleason score (P = .001) and preoperative PSA (P = .01); extent of margin positivity was not predictive of PSA recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.02; P = .97) nor was tumor volume a significant factor when adjusted for other covariates (P = .27). Preoperative PSA, tumor stage, and Gleason score remained significant prognostic factors in evaluating the likelihood of PSA recurrence in patients with positive surgical margins; the extent of margin positivity, however, is not a prognostic factor for PSA recurrence and should, therefore, not necessarily be included in the final report for radical prostatectomy specimens.     

Frozen section evaluation of margins in radical prostatectomy specimens: a contemporary study and literature review

The utility of routine frozen section (FS) analysis for margin evaluation during radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial. A retrospective search was conducted to identify RPs evaluated by FS over a 5-year period. The potential of FS to discriminate between benign and malignant tissue and to predict final margins was evaluated. During the study period, 71 (12.3%) of 575 cases underwent FS evaluation of margins, generating 192 individual FSs. There were 8 FSs diagnosed as atypical/indeterminate because of significant freezing, crushing, and/or thermal artifacts; 11 as positive for carcinoma; and 173 as benign. Two FSs classified as benign were diagnosed as positive for carcinoma on subsequent permanent section. Frozen sections' sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma were 85%, 100%, 100%, 99%, and 99%, respectively. Overall RP final margin predictive accuracy was 81%. Positive FS was significantly associated with perineural invasion on biopsy and extraprostatic extension and higher stage disease on RP, but not with the overall final margin status. The high FS accuracy supports its use to guide the extent of surgery. However, FS cannot be used to predict the overall final margin status. Recognition of the histological artifacts inherent to the FS procedure is important to ensure appropriate utilization.     

Discrepancies between Gleason scores of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of Gleason scores in prostate needle biopsy diagnosis and to investigate factors affecting the accuracy of the tumor grade. A single pathologist reviewed 116 sets of prostate cancer biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens. The following factors were examined to determine their effect on the accuracy of the biopsy Gleason scores: (i) relative tumor differentiation; (ii) pathological stage; (iii) amount of tissue in the biopsy specimen; (iv) amount of cancer tissue in the biopsy specimen; (v) tumor heterogeneity; (vi) clinical findings (prostate specific antigen value and digital rectal examination); and (vii) interobserver variability. In 53 cases the Gleason score of biopsy specimens was identical to the score of prostatectomy specimens (45.7%). Fifty-four cases (46.6%) of biopsy specimens were undergraded. The most common discrepancy was diagnosis of well-differentiated carcinoma in the biopsy but diagnosis of moderately differentiated tumor in the corresponding prostatectomy specimen. This discrepancy occurred when the amount of tumor in the biopsy was 3 mm or less. Biopsy and prostatectomy results showed less agreement when the original biopsy tumor grade rendered by nine different pathologists was used, suggesting that interobserver variability can adversely affect the accuracy of tumor grade. Clarifying the histologic criteria for distinguishing each grade, especially between Gleason grades 2 and 3, is important for accurate grading.     

Improving the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with the addition of detailed pathology of the positive surgical margin and cribriform growth

The risk on biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is usually estimated using PSA and pathological stage and grading including the presence of positive surgical margins (PSM). Objective was to investigate whether the presence of cribriform growth in the primary tumor, Grade Group (GG) at the PSM, and length of the PSM have added value in the prognostication. We analyzed data of 835 patients initially treated with RP between 2000 and 2017. Cox regression models were developed to compare the baseline model (PSA, pT-stage, pN-stage, GG at RP, and presence of PSM) with an extended model (adding the presence of cribriform growth, length and GG at the PSM) using the likelihood ratio test. Discrimination was assessed at internal validation by the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) at 3- and 5-year. A total of 224 men experienced BCR. Median follow-up for men without BCR was 50.4 months (interquartile range, IQR 11.9–95.5). The extended model had a significant better fit, χ²(4) = 31.0, p < 0.001 than the baseline model. The AUC of the 3- and 5-year extended model was 0.85 (95% CI 0.81–0.88) compared to 0.83 (95% CI 0.79–0.87) for the baseline model. Importantly, the presence of cribriform growth in the primary tumor, and GG ≥ 2 at PSM were associated with a higher risk on BCR. In conclusion, the addition of pathological variables improved the prediction of the risk on BCR after RP slightly. However, the clinical implications of this model are important.     

Intraoperative pathology consultation during urological surgery: Impact on final margin status and pitfalls of frozen section diagnosis

Despite recent improvements in diagnostic and surgical techniques in urological oncology, positive resection margin remains a significant concern for surgeons. Meanwhile, intraoperative pathology consultation with frozen section assessment (FSA), particularly for histological diagnosis of the lesions incidentally found or enlarged or sentinel lymph nodes, generally provides critical information which enables immediate decision making for optimal patient care. The intraoperative evaluation of surgical margins is also often requested, although there are some differences in its application between institutions and surgeons. Importantly, it remains to be determined whether intraoperative FSA indeed contributes to reducing the risk of final positive margins and thereby improving long-term patient outcomes. This review summarizes available data indicating the potential impact of FSA at the surgical margins during urological surgeries, including radical or partial cystectomy, partial nephrectomy, radical prostatectomy, penectomy, and orchiectomy. The accuracy and pitfalls of the intraoperative consultation/FSA diagnosis are also discussed.     

Handling and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens in Europe: a web-based survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP)

Aims:  To survey current European practices in handling and reporting of radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.
Methods and results:  A European Network of Uropathology (ENUP) was organized for the dissemination of information, survey studies and research collaborations. Contact data of uropathologists were collected from 321 pathology laboratories in 15 West European countries. In the first ENUP survey, 67.6% (217/321) of the members replied to a web-based questionnaire. Some practices were adopted by a large majority, e.g. inking of the specimen (96.6%), Gleason grading (99.5%), stratifying extraprostatic extension (EPE) according to extent (88.2%), reporting TNM stage (88.6%) and reporting location of positive margins (98%). As many as 71.6% of respondents always embedded the entire prostate and only 10.8% always practised partial embedding. Whole mounts were routinely used by 37.5% and standard blocks by 55.5%. Among areas with variable routines were methods to define focal versus extensive EPE and methods to quantify margin positivity, probably reflecting that the optimal method has yet to be determined.
Conclusions:  Some practices are almost universally adopted in Europe, whereas others still need to be standardized. The results of the study may be helpful when judging what recommendations are reasonable to issue.     

The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens

At an International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference in 2005, the Gleason grading system for prostatic carcinoma underwent its first major revision. Gleason pattern 4 now includes most cribriform patterns and also fused and poorly formed glands. Our aims were to compare the grade distributions and assess the agreement between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens for the modified and conventional Gleason grading. More than 3,000 radical prostatectomy (RP), needle biopsies (NB) and transurethral resection specimens were assigned modified Gleason score (GS). In NB, modified GS 3 + 3 = 6 and 3 + 4 = 7a were almost equally common, while in RP, 3 + 4 = 7a was most common followed by 4 + 3 = 7b. After application of the modified GS on NB, a substantial shift in GS distribution occurred: The proportion of GS 6 and 7 were 48 and 26%, respectively, with conventional Gleason grading as compared to 22 and 68%, respectively, with modified grading. In 368 men, the agreement between NB and RP with a modified GS 6, 7a, 7b and 8–10 in NB was 28, 88, 68 and 64–100%, respectively. The overall agreement improved from 58 to 72% (p < 0.001) compared to conventional GS. The higher agreement with modified Gleason grading may facilitate therapeutic decisions.     

Clinical map document based on XML (cMDX): document architecture with mapping feature for reporting and analysing prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens

Background  

The pathology report of radical prostatectomy specimens plays an important role in clinical decisions and the prognostic evaluation in Prostate Cancer (PCa). The anatomical schema is a helpful tool to document PCa extension for clinical and research purposes. To achieve electronic documentation and analysis, an appropriate documentation model for anatomical schemas is needed. For this purpose we developed cMDX.     

磷酸化MEK2 (Thr394)在结直肠癌中的表达及其临床意义

 目的：探讨MAPK信号转导途径中MEK2蛋白第394号位点苏氨酸残基(Thr394)磷酸化在结直肠癌发病机制中的作用及临床意义。方法：采用组织芯片和免疫组织化学方法检测96例结直肠癌组织、24例结直肠腺瘤组织和24例癌旁正常组织的p-MEK2（Thr394）蛋白表达并比较其表达差异;此外,对前面的96例以及另外的337例临床病例参数和预后资料完善的结直肠癌患者,采用组织芯片-免疫组织化学方法检测p-MEK2（Thr394）的表达,并分析其与结直肠癌的预后及临床病例参数的相关性。结果：p-MEK2（Thr394）在癌旁正常组织、结直肠腺瘤和结直肠癌组织中表达呈递减趋势,其高表达率分别为100%、66.7%、19.8%,差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。 p-MEK2（Thr394）蛋白的表达与性别、年龄、体重指数、分化程度、T分期、N分期、TNM分期、肝转移及K-ras基因突变情况等临床病理参数间均无显著相关性（P>0.05）。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,p-MEK2 (Thr394) 表达与结直肠癌患者预后无显著相关性。结论：MEK2蛋白第394号位点上的苏氨酸残基磷酸化在癌旁正常组织和结直肠腺瘤、结直肠癌组织中的表达呈下降趋势,提示其可能与结直肠癌的发生及发展相关。     

IMP3 expression in biopsy specimens of colorectal cancer predicts lymph node metastasis and TNM stage

IMP3 is associated with lymph node metastasis and TNM stage and is a good independent prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the expression status and clinical implication of IMP3 in biopsy specimens have not yet been studied. We aim to address whether the presence of IMP3 expression in preoperative biopsies of CRC could predict lymph node metastasis and TNM stage. In this study, we examined IMP3 expression in paired biopsy and resection specimens of 71 CRC and analyzed the correlation of IMP3 expression with clinicopathological parameters. In the biopsy specimens, IMP3 positive expression was observed in 56 of 71 cases (78.9%) whereas negative expression was observed in 15 of 71 cases (21.1%). In the resection specimens, IMP3 positive expression was detected in 83.1% cases (59/71) whereas negative expression was detected in 16.9% cases (12/71). The absolute concordance rate between biopsy and resection specimens was 90.1% (64/71). The Spearman correlation test documented the existence of a strong linear correlation between the percentage of IMP3-positive cells in the biopsy and resection specimen (r = 0.629; P < 0.001). IMP3 expression in resection specimens was significantly related to histological grade (P = 0.043), T classification (P = 0.035), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.023), TNM stage (P = 0.007), tumor border (P = 0.049) and tumor budding (P = 0.012). IMP3 expression in biopsy specimens was significantly related to lymph node metastasis (P = 0.004), TNM stage (P = 0.005) and tumor budding (P = 0.001). In conclusion, IMP3 expression in biopsy specimens could be used to predict lymph node metastasis and TNM stage in CRC patients.     

Frameshift mutations of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase genes in gastric and colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability

Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerases consist of 16 members that modify nuclear proteins by building adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymers. Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase 1, the prototype poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase, and some poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerases are involved in many cellular processes including DNA damage response/repair, cell death, and inflammation. Inactivation of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase proteins frequently enhances genomic instability and apoptosis inactivation, suggesting their roles in cancer development. However, genetic alterations of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase genes have not been reported in cancers. In a public database, we found that poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase 1, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase 11, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase 14, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase 15, tankyrase-1 (TNKS1), and tankyrase-2 (TNKS2) genes have mononucleotide repeats in coding DNA sequences. To see whether these genes are mutated in cancers with microsatellite instability, we analyzed the mononucleotide repeats in 30 gastric cancers with high microsatellite instability, 13 gastric cancers with low microsatellite instability, 45 gastric cancers with stable microsatellite instability, 40 colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability, 14 colorectal cancers with low microsatellite instability, and 45 colorectal cancers with stable microsatellite instability by single-strand conformation polymorphism. We found poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase 14, TNKS1, and TNKS2 mutations in 8, 4, and 18 cancers, respectively. They were detected in cancers with high microsatellite instability but not in cancers with low microsatellite instability or stable microsatellite instability. The gastric cancers and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability harbored one or more mutations of the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase genes in 50.0% and 27.5%, respectively. Of the genes with mutations, we analyzed poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase 14 protein expression in gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability. Loss of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase 14 expression was observed in 33% of the gastric cancers and 35% of the colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability, whereas its loss was observed in 31% of the gastric cancers and 36% of the colorectal cancers with low microsatellite instability/stable microsatellite instability. Our data indicate that frameshift mutations of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerases genes and losses of expression of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase 14 protein are features of gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability and suggest that these alterations might contribute to development of cancers with high microsatellite instability by deregulating poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase-mediated signaling.     

Incidence of intraductal carcinoma,multifocality and bilateral significant disease in radical prostatectomy specimens from Japan and United States

Significant differences, including epidemiologic, clinical, pathologic and genetic, exist between Asian and Caucasian prostate cancer. Detailed pathologic data are, however, scarce. We studied in detail and compared the pathological features of prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens in 228 patients (117 Japan, 111 US). Japanese prostate cancer had a higher Gleason grade group (mean 2.67 vs. 2.42 US, P < 0.05), but lower pathological stage (72 % pT2 and 28 % pT3 vs 55 % pT2 and 45 % pT3 US, P < 0.05). Japanese cancer showed significantly more tumor foci (3.8 vs 2.9 US, P < 0.05), and higher incidence of bilateral significant disease (81.3 % vs. 66.7 % US, P < 0.05). The dominant tumor nodules in Japanese cases had higher Gleason grade group (mean 2.73 vs. 2.40 US, P < 0.05). The incidence of intraductal carcinoma was significantly higher in Japanese patients (35.3 % vs. 12.6 % US, P < 0.01), which was independent of Gleason score (7: 30.9 % Japan vs 11.8 % US, P < 0.01; ≥ 8: 87.5 % Japan vs 28.6 % US, P < 0.01) and tumor stage (pT2: 24.1 % Japan vs 6.6 % US, P < 0.01; pT3: 62.9 % Japan vs 20 % US, P < 0.01). These findings demonstrate distinct pathological features in prostate cancer between Japanese and Caucasian patients, and may have important diagnostic and therapeutic implications.     

The significance of the P504S expression pattern of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) with and without adenocarcinoma of the prostate in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens

Diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma is usually not difficult in biopsy specimens. Problems may occur in biopsy specimens, containing only a few suspicious lesions. Recently, P504S has been tested as a new marker for prostatic carcinoma. When over-expressed in atypical glands without basal cells, it establishes the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. We analysed the staining intensity of P504S in 208 biopsy specimens from prostates (1) with adenocarcinoma (n=132), (2) with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) with adenocarcinoma (n=36), (3) with HGPIN alone (n=40) and in radical prostatectomy specimens with HGPIN adjacent to (n=54) or distant from adenocarcinoma (n=64). P504S expression was negative to weakly positive in biopsy specimens showing HGPIN without carcinoma and weakly positive in radical prostatectomy specimens revealing HGPIN distant from adenocarcinoma. In biopsy specimens with a combination of HGPIN and adenocarcinoma and in radical prostatectomy specimens with HGPIN adjacent to adenocarcinoma, P504S was strongly expressed. The same findings were made in radical prostatectomy specimens containing adenocarcinoma and HGPIN adjacent to or distant from adenocarcinoma and in preoperative biopsies revealing adenocarcinoma and HGPIN. These results suggest that moderate to strong P504S expression in HGPIN of biopsy specimens is indicative of an associated adenocarcinoma and may be helpful in the choice of therapy.     

保乳手术标本定位全部取材病理检查的意义

目的探讨保证保乳手术标本切缘阴性的病理取材诊断方法及意义。方法（1）术中对145例保乳手术标本进行定位全切片检查,79例进行选择性取材检查;（2）术后对84例保乳手术标本进行定位全切片检查,226例进行选择性取材检查;（3）对两组手术病例进行随访观察。结果（1）术中定位全切片取材切缘阳性检出率（24．1％,35／145）明显高于选择性取材（6．3％,5／79）,差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．01）;（2）术后定位全切片取材切缘阳性检出率（29／84,34．5％）亦明显高于选择性取材（12．0％,27／226）,差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．01）;（3）经2～46个月随访,保乳手术标本选择性取材病例中有3例分别于术后6、15、28个月局部复发,定位全切片取材病例无复发。结论定位全切片取材和诊断可以降低保乳手术标本切缘阳性的漏诊率,并能够定位切缘阳性的部位,对减小二次手术和术后复发的风险,保证保乳手术的成功具有重要作用。