Evaluation of a new hepatitis C virus sequencing assay as a routine method for genotyping

The determination of HCV genotypes, subtypes and isolates has been helpful in understanding the evolution and the epidemiology of the virus, and is an important factor in the pre-treatment evaluation. A new simpler and automated sequencing based system has been developed recently, the Visible Genetics TruGene Hepatitis C Assay. The aim of the study was to compare this new genotyping assay with reverse hybridization based Innogenetics INNO-LiPA HCV II assay that is used most commonly. Eighty-eight HCV-RNA positive patients were enrolled and divided in four groups: 26 hemodialysed patients, 30 untreated patients with chronic HCV hepatitis, 12 IFN non-responder patients with chronic HCV hepatitis, 20 asymptomatic HCV positive subjects. The 5'-UTR region was amplified by RT-PCR and the nucleotide sequences determined by the TruGene assay. In parallel, the amplicons were also tested by INNO-LiPA. Concordant results were obtained in 80 out of 88 cases (90.9%). The new assay allowed to genotype 2 samples not typed by LiPA as 1b and 2a/c. The new system also allowed the subtyping of 3 untypable samples, classified as genotype 1 by INNO-LiPA, as genotype 1b (1 sample) and, as genotype 4 (2 samples). The difference between these genotype 4 isolates and the closest genotype 1 isolate was 6 nucleotides. One LiPA genotype 1a sample was typed as 1b and 2 genotype 1b samples were all typed as 1a by the sequence analysis. In conclusion, the new assay is a sensitive and rapid method that is suitable for accurate large-scale genotyping.     

Evaluation of sequencing of HCV core/E1, NS5A and NS5B as a genotype predictive tool in comparison with commercial assays targeting 5′UTR

BackgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping is required for tailoring the dose and duration of antiviral therapy, predicting virological response rates, and selecting future treatment options.ObjectiveTo establish whether baseline genotypes, performed by INNO-LiPA Version 1.0 (v1.0), before 2008, were valid for making treatment decisions now or whether genotypic determination should be repeated. Furthermore, to evaluate concordance between Abbott RealTime genotype II assay (RT) and genotyping by sequencing HCV C/E1, NS5A, NS5B.Study designGenotyping by RT and sequencing was performed on paired historic and current specimens from 50 patients previously baseline genotyped using INNO-LiPA.ResultsOf 100 samples from 50 patients, ≥2 of HCV genomic target regions yielded a sequence that was suitable for genotyping, with 100% concordance, providing no evidence of recombination events. Genotype and subtype prediction based on RT and sequencing agreed in 62.8% historic and 72.7% current specimens, with a kappa coefficient score of 0.48 and 0.76, respectively.LiPA could not subtype 46% of HCV gt1 infections, and LiPA subgenotype was only in agreement with RT and sequencing in 28.6% cases, where matched baseline and historic specimens were available.Three patients were indeterminate by RT, and five patients with HCV gt1 infections could not be subtyped by RT. However, RT revealed mixed infections in five patients where sequencing detected only single HCV infection at 20% threshold.ConclusionGenotyping by sequencing, exhibited excellent concordance, with moderate to good agreement with RT, and could resolve RT indeterminates and subtype HCV-gt1 infections not possible by LiPA.     

Genotyping hepatitis C viruses from Southeast Asia by a novel line probe assay that simultaneously detects core and 5' untranslated regions

Hepatitis C viruses (HCVs) display a high level of sequence diversity and are currently divided into six genotypes. A line probe assay (LiPA), which targets the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) of the HCV genome, is widely used for genotyping. However, this assay cannot distinguish many genotype 6 subtypes from genotype 1 due to high sequence similarity in the 5'UTR. We investigated the accuracy of a new generation LiPA (VERSANT HCV genotype 2.0 assay), in which genotyping is based on 5'UTR and core sequences, by testing 75 selected HCV RNA-positive sera from Southeast Asia (Vietnam and Thailand). For comparison, sera were tested on the 5'UTR based VERSANT HCV genotype assay and processed for sequence analysis of the 5'UTR-to-core and NS5b regions as well. Phylogenetic analysis of both regions revealed the presence of genotype 1, 2, 3, and 6 viruses. Using the new LiPA assay, genotypes 6c to 6l and 1a/b samples were more accurately genotyped than with the previous test only targeting the 5'UTR (96% versus 71%, respectively). These results indicate that the VERSANT HCV genotype 2.0 assay is able to discriminate genotypes 6c to 6l from genotype 1 and allows a more accurate identification of genotype 1a from 1b by using the genotype-specific core information.     

Hepatitis C virus subtyping based on sequencing of the C/E1 and NS5B genomic regions in comparison to a commercially available line probe assay

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype determination is required in clinical practice to establish the dose and duration of antiviral treatment. Although subtype identification does not impact on current therapy this is changing with new specific inhibitors of HCV enzymes and functions which are becoming available worldwide. These new drugs may yield different antiviral responses and resistance profiles. Accurate classification of HCV genotype and subtype is therefore crucial. An “in‐house” method was developed for improving HCV subtyping and the results were compared with a second‐generation line probe assay (LiPA) used extensively in Portugal. Phylogenetic analysis was undertaken of the C/E1 and NS5B genomic regions of HCV isolated from 72 prisoners with chronic HCV infection and from reference samples. Although LiPA is considered to be a good method for genotyping, HCV was subtyped in only 47.2% of cases compared with 95.8% of cases by the “in‐house” method. Molecular data for both C/E1 and NS5B regions were obtained in 88.9% of the samples. Two out of 23 cases of subtype 1a were misclassified as subtype 1b by LiPA. A putative recombinant like RF1_2k/1b, two potential inter‐genotypic recombinants 1b/4a and 3a/4a, and also a potential intra‐genotypic recombinant 2q/2k in C/E1 and 2k/2a in NS5B were also identified. The “in‐house” method enabled HCV to be subtyped accurately with the detection, in some cases, of recombinant viruses or dual HCV infections. Near full‐length genomic analysis to characterize these potential recombinant viruses is planned. J. Med. Virol. 85:815–822, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Evaluation of a new-generation line-probe assay that detects 5' untranslated and core regions to genotype and subtype hepatitis C virus

The VERSANT HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA 2.0; Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium; distributed by Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY) is a new-generation line-probe assay that simultaneously detects sequences in the 5' untranslated (5'UTR) and core regions to genotype and subtype hepatitis C virus (HCV). We tested 60 specimens of known genotype and subtype and 2 specimens with mixed infections with the LiPA 2.0 assay. After arbitration based on genotype and subtype determined by sequencing, there was concordance in 58 of 60 specimens (specificity, 96.7%). Computer-assisted typing yielded comparable results, but much more rapidly. Of 67 clinical specimens, 64 readily yielded genotype and subtype; 3 indeterminate specimens were typed by sequencing and were uncommon types not in the database. The newgeneration line-probe assay that detects the 5'UTR and core regions to genotype and subtype HCV is applicable to more than 95% of specimens. Interpretation is facilitated by computer-assisted analysis.     

Evaluation of the INNO-LiPA HBV genotyping assay for determination of hepatitis B virus genotype

Specific genotypes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) are increasingly recognized for their clinical significance and association with particular viral mutations. Although many HBV genotyping methods exist, there has been no standardized or commercially available method for direct molecular typing of the HBV genome. A newly available line probe assay (INNO-LiPA HBV Genotyping assay; Innogenetics N.V., Ghent, Belgium) that allows the identification of HBV genotypes A to G was assessed by comparison with pre-S1/pre-S2 sequence analysis of the isolates in 188 serum specimens. All seven genotypes were detected by the line probe assay (LiPA), and complete concordance between LiPA and sequence analysis was observed for 152 specimens (81%). LiPA was able to detect 19 mixed genotype infections not detected by amplicon sequencing, which for the most part were confirmed by cloning and sequencing of the pre-S1/pre-S2 amplicon. Four specimens had discrepant results between the two methods, and five specimens had indeterminate results by LiPA. The HBV DNA in four specimens was unable to be amplified by the nested INNO-LiPA HBV DR amplification primers; however, the HBV DNA in six specimens unable to be genotyped by sequencing was clearly genotyped by LiPA. The INNO-LiPA HBV Genotyping assay appears to be useful for the rapid genotyping of HBV, particularly for the sensitive detection of mixed genotype infections.     

Performance Comparison of the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 Assay (LiPA) and the Abbott Realtime HCV Genotype II Assay for Detecting Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 6

The Versant HCV genotype 2.0 assay (line probe assay [LiPA] 2.0), based on reverse hybridization, and the Abbott Realtime HCV genotype II assay (Realtime II), based on genotype-specific real-time PCR, have been widely used to analyze hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. However, their performances for detecting HCV genotype 6 infections have not been well studied. Here, we analyzed genotype 6 in 63 samples from the China HCV Genotyping Study that were originally identified as genotype 6 using the LiPA 2.0. The genotyping results were confirmed by nonstructural 5B (NS5B) or core sequence phylogenetic analysis. A total of 57 samples were confirmed to be genotype 6 (51 genotype 6a, 5 genotype 6n, and 1 genotype 6e). Four samples identified as a mixture of genotypes 6 and 4 by the LiPA 2.0 were confirmed to be genotype 3b. The remaining two samples classified as genotype 6 by the LiPA 2.0 were confirmed to be genotype 1b, which were intergenotypic recombinants and excluded from further comparison. In 57 genotype 6 samples detected using the Realtime II version 2.00 assay, 47 genotype 6a samples were identified as genotype 6, one 6e sample was misclassified as genotype 1, and four 6a and five 6n samples yielded indeterminate results. Nine nucleotide profiles in the 5′ untranslated region affected the performances of both assays. Therefore, our analysis shows that both assays have limitations in identifying HCV genotype 6. The LiPA 2.0 cannot distinguish some 3b samples from genotype 6 samples. The Realtime II assay fails to identify some 6a and all non-6a subtypes, and it misclassifies genotype 6e as genotype 1.     

Evaluation of Versant hepatitis C virus genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping is a tool used to optimize antiviral treatment regimens. The newly developed Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 uses sequence information from both the 5' untranslated region and the core region, allowing distinction between HCV genotype 1 and subtypes c to l of genotype 6 and between subtypes a and b of genotype 1. HCV-positive samples were genotyped manually using the Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 system according to the manufacturer's instructions. For the comparison study, Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 1.0 was used. In this study, 99.7% of the samples could be amplified, the genotype of 96.0% of samples could be determined, and the agreement with the reference method was 99.4% when a genotype was determined. The reproducibility study showed no significant differences in performance across sites (P = 0.43) or across lots (P = 0.88). In the comparison study, 13 samples that were uninterpretable or incorrectly genotyped with Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 1.0 were correctly genotyped by Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0. Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 is a sensitive, accurate, and reliable assay for HCV genotyping. The inclusion of the core region probes in Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 2.0 results in a genotyping success rate higher than that of the current Versant HCV genotype assay (LiPA) 1.0.     

Comparison of different methods of hepatitis C virus genotyping

In order to introduce the approach of HCV genotyping in our laboratory, a comparative study of 3 molecular and 1 serological methods, was conducted on 62 HCV RNA positive sera. The molecular genotyping methods target the 5'untranslated (UTR) region of the virus genome and are based on an amplification of the viral genome, followed by partial sequencing, analyses of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) or molecular hybridation (Inno LiPA, Innogenetics). The serological method or serotyping is based on the detection of antibodies to genotype specific epitopes derivated from the Non Structural (NS) 4 region of the viral genome (HCV 1-6 Serotyping Assay, Murex Biotech). "In house" methods, sequencing and RFLP, identified the genotype for 13 samples classified as non-typables by commercial kits Inno LiPA test and HCV 1-6 Serotyping Assay. Mixed infections revealed, especially by Inno LiPA, could not be identified by partial sequencing, which seems to detect only predominant genotype. For 4 samples, genotyping results of the methods targeting the 5'UTR were discordant with those of the serotyping of the NS4 region. Commercial kits are efficient to determine HCV genotypes, particularly in the context of antiviral therapy and patient's follow-up, sequencing remains the best alternative for more complete characterisation of viral strains and for epidemiological investigations.     

2a型丙型肝炎病毒5’非编码区的RACE护增及二级结构的分析

目的：获得真全长中国大陆2a型丙型肝炎病毒（HCV）5’非编码区（5’UTR）cDNA，并分析其一级结构和二级结构，为进一步研究其在HCR复制、翻译中的调控机制、开发新的抗HCV药物奠定基础。方法：利用逆转录套式聚合酶链反应（RT－PCR）联合限制性内切酶长度多态性分析（RFLP）初步筛选出1例2a型HCV感染者，采用cDNA末端快速扩增技术（RACE）扩增出一条约800bp的cDNA片段，A－T克隆，用RFLP与PCR鉴定重组子，全自动序列分析仪测定插入子序列，RNAdraw预测二级结构。结果：RACE法获得真全长2a型HCV 5’端序列。5个克隆中，3个克隆含全长5’UTR序列，与HCV－1，HC－C2，HC－J6，HC－J8相比，同源性分别为93．6％－94．4％，92．1％－93．0％，98．8％－99．7％，96．2％－96．5％，与2a型标准株HC－J6相比，21，170，222，247，339位不同，分别为G，A，C，C，T,但这些突变不影响其二级结构。另外2个克隆为5’端缺失突变株，分别缺失54bp和144bp。结论：RACE技术快速、有效、实用，可用效获得病毒基因组的末端序列；依此获得中国大陆2a型HCV的5’UTR cDNA；在感染者血液中存在5’端部分缺失的HCV基因片段。     

Hepatitis C virus genotyping by restriction fragment length polymorphism of polymerase chain reaction products generated with a HCV detection kit

Highly conserved sequence in the 5' untranslated region(UTR) of hepatitis C virus(HCV) genome have been targeted by most nucleic acid amplification-based detection assays, such as Amplicor HCV test, a commercially available assay kit. In this study, we classified HCV genotypes by direct sequencing determination for 5' UTR of nested-PCR after Amplicor HCV test. Then, based on the results of sequence, RFLP analysis after digestion of the nested PCR fragments with Hae III or Sau 3AI to classify HCV genotype was evaluated. RFLP analysis distinguished the type 1, 2a and 2b. Only one of 29 samples was not classified by RFLP analysis due to the point mutation of Hae III recognition site. HCV genotypes commonly found in JAPAN were classified into three types, 1b, 2a, and 2b. Also, RFLP analysis requires fewer resources than serotype grouping test. Hence, the present method provides an adaptable and rapid HCV genotyping in clinical laboratory in JAPAN.     

Comparison of hepatitis C virus NS5b and 5' noncoding gene sequencing methods in a multicenter study

A national evaluation study was performed in 11 specialized laboratories with the objective of assessing their capacities to genotype hepatitis C virus (HCV) and define the applicability of a given genotyping method. The panel consisted of 14 samples positive for HCV RNA of different genotypes (including 3 samples with two different artificially mixed genotypes) and 1 HCV-negative sample. Seventeen sets of data were gathered from the 11 participating laboratories. The sensitivities ranged from 64.3 to 100% and from 42.7 to 85.7% for the methods that used sequencing of the NS5b region and the 5' noncoding (5' NC) region, respectively. When the data for the artificially mixed samples were excluded, NS5b genotyping gave correct results for 80% of the samples, 1.7% of the samples were misclassified, and 18.3% of the samples had false-negative results. By 5' NC-region genotyping methods, 58.3% of the results were correct, 29.7% were incomplete, 8.3% were misclassifications, 1.2% were false positive, and 2.4% were false negative. Only two procedures based on NS5b sequencing correctly identified one of the three samples with mixtures of genotypes; the other methods identified the genotype corresponding to the strain with the highest viral load in the sample. Our results suggest that HCV 5' NC-region genotyping methods give sufficient information for clinical purposes, in which the determination of the subtype is not essential, and that NS5b genotyping methods are more reliable for subtype determination, which is required in epidemiological studies.     

TRUGENE sequencing versus INNO-LiPA for sub-genotyping of HCV genotype-4

Hepatitis C virus genotypes and subtypes determination is an important factor for understanding the epidemiology of the virus, in the pre-treatment evaluation of the patients and in defining better treatment strategies. In the present study, we compared two commercially available assays for HCV genotyping: the reverse hybridization based Innogenetics INNO-LiPA HCV II and the direct sequencing by TRUGENE assay. The study included 31 HCV-RNA positive Egyptian patients; 18 patients with chronic active hepatitis, 8 with HCC, and 5 with cirrhosis. Using the TRUGENE genotyping test, all the samples had genotype 4 (100%) and subtyped as 4a in 18/31(58%), 4c in 10/31 (32%), 4e in 1/31 (3%), 4a/c in 1/31 (3%), and 4g in 1/31 (3%). Using the INNO-LiPA assay, 30 samples had genotype 4 (97%), and 1 sample had genotype 1e (3%). One sample showed mixed infection with type 4f and type 1. Only six samples were subtypable by INNO-LiPA, three were genotype 4c/d, and the other three were 4f, 4e, and 1e. Seven samples gave reactivity in the INNO-LiPA of lines 5, 6, 16, 17, 18, which are considered untypable by the interpretation chart but considered to be a rare HCV genotype 4 by the manufacturer. At the genotype level, there was a 97% concordance between TRUGENE sequencing and INNO-LiPA, but at the subtype level the concordance rate was 3% only. We conclude that the TRUGENE genotyping assay is a reliable test for HCV genotyping for the detection of major types and subtypes detection, while INNO-LiPA is a good test at the genotype level but unreliable for subtyping especially in the Egyptian population. This is mainly due to the high diversity of genotype 4, which is the most prevalent genotype in Egypt.     

Comparative study of different methods to genotype hepatitis C virus type 6 variants

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 6a is found frequently in Southeast Asia. In Thailand, however, genotype 6 variants may exist which posses a genotype 1 like sequence in the 5' non-coding region. In order to genotype correctly these viruses, four different methods; INNO-LiPA assay, two RFLP assays on the core region (using different restriction enzymes) and phylogenetic analysis of the core sequences were compared. Samples from 17 chronic HCV patients from the Netherlands and Thailand and 18 anti-HCV positive blood donors recruited from Thailand were tested. The INNO-LiPA could not distinguish genotype 6 variants. The RFLP methods used could not, or only in combination with 5'NCR genotyping methods, identify type 6 variants. In conclusion, for identification of type 6 variants at least two different regions of the HCV genome have to be analyzed (both 5'NCR and core).     

Subtyping genotype 2 hepatitis C viruses from Tunisia: identification of two putative new subtypes

HCV variants were classified into six genotypes (1–6) subdivided into several subtypes with different geographic distribution worldwide. Previous studies conducted in Tunisia showed that genotype 1 counts for more than 80 % of circulating HCV genotypes and most of the isolates belong to subtype 1b. Genotype 2 comes in the second position, however, few sequences have been analyzed and published. In the present study, 89 isolates from Tunisian patients, typed as genotype 2 by the InnoLIPA commercial probe hybridization test, were sequenced in the NS5B and Core/E1 regions. All the isolates, clustered with the genotype 2 reference sequences, in the NS5B and in the Core/E1 region and the phylogenetic analyses in the two genomic regions were perfectly concordant: subtype 2c was the most frequent (58 out of 89, 65.1 %) and few isolates belonged to subtypes 2k(n = 10), 2i(n = 5), and 2b(n = 1). Fifteen isolates did not match with any of the reference sequences representing the genotype 2 subtypes, identified up-to-date. They divided into 2 separate clusters with high bootstrap values in both genomic regions. This study shows perfect concordance between the NS5B and the Core/E1 region suggesting that any of the two regions can be used for genotyping and that intergenotypic and intragenotypic recombinants are not very frequent, at least for HCV isolates from genotype 2. The present study also shows a predominance of subtype 2c among genotype 2 HCV isolates circulating in Tunisia, the co-circulation of minor subtypes (2k, 2i, and 2b) and proposes the possible existence of two other new subtypes.     

Palindromic-nucleotide substitutions (PNS) of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 and 5a from South Africa

The HCV stem-loop subdomains III-a, -b and -c have been shown to reflect the characteristics of the virus and identify isolates by genus, genotype and subtype. The aim of this study was to investigate the genotype-specific PNS within the 5′UTR of prevalent HCV genotypes (1 and 5a) found in South Africa. The genotype 5a (N = 35) and genotype 1 sequences (N = 20) were from patients presenting with liver disease or haemophilia, respectively. PNS HCV typing characteristics, defined previously, were observed. The PNS method differentiated subtypes 1a and 1c from subtype 1b by the base change at nucleotide position 243. A lack of structural data from the variable loci V1 of the 5′UTR did not allow us to further differentiate the subtypes of 1. A nucleotide change from a thymine (T) to a cytosine (C) at position 183 was found among genotype 5a sequences. This mutation changed the stable U-AA bond to a Y AA bulge at base-pair position 32. There was an insertion of a single adenine (A) at position 207. At present PNS analysis is labour intensive but, with development of further software to aid the computer analysis, it has the potential to provide a rapid, reliable alternative to phylogenetic analysis.     

Analysis of the 5' noncoding region versus the NS5b region in genotyping hepatitis C virus isolates from blood donors in France

The 5' noncoding region (5' NCR) of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become the standard for genotyping even though several reports show that its use can result in classification errors. The purpose of this study was to perform genotyping based on sequence analysis of the NS5b region in a set of 357 HCV strains isolated from blood donors in France in 2002 and 2003. Results were compared with those previously obtained using 5' NCR analysis, and HCV subtype distribution was reevaluated. Twenty-six of 120 strains (approximately 22%) initially identified as genotype 1b by 5' NCR region sequence analysis were reclassified as genotype 1a by NS5b region sequence analysis. Similarly, 14 of 23 strains (approximately 61%) initially identified as 2a/2c were reclassified as non-2a and non-2c subtypes, and 12 of 22 strains (approximately 45%) initially identified as 4c/4d subtypes were reclassified as non-4c and non-4d subtypes. Sequence analysis of the NS5b region also revealed 5 putative new subtype 2 variants and 2 putative new subtype 4 variants. Although these findings demonstrated full agreement between 5' NCR and NS5b sequence analysis with regard to type classification, genotyping based on phylogenetic analysis of the NS5b region is more accurate for subtype determination than genotyping based on analysis of the 5' NCR. Sequence analysis of the NS5b region is mandatory for epidemiologic studies.     

Improvement of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype determination with the new version of the INNO-LiPA HCV assay

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates have been classified into six main genotypes. Genotyping methods, and especially the widely used line probe assay (LiPA), are frequently based on the 5'-untranslated region (5'UTR). However, this region is not appropriate for discriminating HCV strains at the subtype level and for distinguishing many genotype 6 samples from genotype 1. We investigated the capacity of a novel LiPA (Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay) based on the simultaneous detection of 5'UTR and Core regions for genotypes 1 and 6 to provide correct HCV genotypes (characterized with a phylogenetic analysis) in a set of HCV strains mainly encountered in Western countries. The improvement was assessed by comparing the results to those obtained with the previous version of the assay. Of the 135 tested samples, 64.7% were concordant for genotype group and subtype with sequencing reference results using the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay versus 37.5% with the previous version. The yield was mainly related to a better characterization of genotype 1, since the accuracy, tested in 62 genotype 1 samples, increased from 45.2% with the first version to 96.8% with the new one. However, this new version necessitates a specific PCR and could no longer be used after 5'UTR PCR used for current HCV infection diagnosis. Moreover, the information provided by 5'UTR hybridization is not reliable for correctly identifying the diversity within genotypes 2 and 4. Thus, the Versant HCV Genotype 2.0 assay remains a useful tool for clinical practice when only the discrimination between major HCV genotypes is necessary.     

Nested restriction site-specific PCR to detect and type hepatitis C virus (HCV): a rapid method to distinguish HCV subtype 1b from other genotypes

Genotypic differentiation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become an integral part of clinical management and epidemiologic studies of hepatitis C infections. Thus, it is extremely important in areas such as the Czech Republic, where current instrumentation and kits for assessing HCV infection are too costly for widespread use. We describe a new and relatively inexpensive method called nested restriction site-specific PCR (RSS-PCR) that generates a "fingerprint" pattern to represent an HCV genotype without the use of restriction endonucleases and that specifically differentiates HCV genotype 1b from the other HCV genotypes. The RSS-PCR method was applied directly to serum samples from patients with hepatitis C from the Czech Republic and from patients with known HCV genotypes from the United States. The method was validated by comparison of the subtype determined by RSS-PCR to the subtype determined from analysis of the 5' noncoding region (NC) or the nonstructural protein gene (NS5b) nucleotide sequence of HCV in these clinical samples. From 75 Czech samples containing HCV RNA, three distinct RSS-PCR patterns were observed; 54 were predicted to contain subtype 1b, 19 were predicted to contain subtype 1a, and 2 were predicted to contain subtype 3a. Among 54 samples predicted to contain HCV genotype 1b, all were confirmed by their 5' NC or NS5b sequences to be subtype 1b. Thus, both the sensitivity and specificity of the RSS-PCR test for the differentiation of HCV subtype 1b from the others were 100%. While the assay described here was designed to specifically differentiate HCV subtype 1b from the other HCV genotypes, the RSS-PCR method can be modified to differentiate any HCV genotype or subtype of interest. Its simplicity and speed may provide new opportunities to study the epidemiology of HCV infections and the relationship between HCV genotypes and clinical outcome by more laboratories throughout the world.