艾司西酞普兰合并奥氮平治疗难治性抑郁症疗效观察

目的 探讨艾司西酞普兰合并奥氮平对难治性抑郁症的临床疗效.方法 将55例难治性抑郁症患者随机分为研究组(艾司西酞普兰合并奥氮平)和对照组(单用艾司西酞普兰),疗程为12周,采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定临床疗效,副反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应.结果 治疗结束后,两组HAMD评分较治疗前均有显著性降低(P＜0.05).治疗后第8、12周末,研究组的HAMD评分显著低于对照组,且差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05).两组副作用均较小,研究组仅在体重增加、嗜睡方面较对照组高,差异有显著性意义(P＜0.05).结论 艾司西酞普兰合并奥氮平治疗难治性抑郁症能明显提高疗效,安全可靠.     

认知疗法合并艾司西酞普兰治疗女性抑郁症患者的疗效

目的:比较艾司西酞普兰合并认知治疗与单用艾司西酞普兰对女性抑郁症患者的疗效。方法:60例女性抑郁症患者随机分为研究组(艾司西酞普兰合并认知治疗组)30例,对照组(单用艾司西酞普兰组)30例,治疗8周。治疗前及治疗1、2、4和8周分别采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定疗效。结果:治疗2周开始,两组HAMD评分均显著下降。研究组治疗1周HAMD明显下降。研究组较对照组HAMD下降更显著。两组不良反应差异无显著性。结论:艾司西酞普兰合并认知治疗对女性抑郁症患者疗效明显,安全性高。     

艾司西酞普兰合并喹硫平改善难治性抑郁症患者症状及社会功能的对照研究

目的 探讨艾司西酞普兰合并喹硫平改善难治性抑郁症患者症状及社会功能的效果.方法 将81例难治性抑郁症患者随机分为研究组(艾司西酞普兰合并喹硫平系统治疗)和对照组(艾司西酞普兰系统治疗),共治疗4周.在基线及治疗后第1、2、4周末采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、社会功能缺陷量表(SDSS)及副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效及不良反应.结果 在治疗后第1周末,研究组HAMD及HAMA评分较基线即有显著性降低(P＜0.05),而对照组HAMD及HAMA评分在第4周末才有显著性降低(P＜0.05).治疗第1周末、第2周末及第4周末,研究组的HAMD及HAMA评分均显著低于对照组,差异均有显著性(P＜0.05).在治疗后第2周末,研究组SDSS总分较基线即有显著性降低(P＜0.05),而对照组SDSS总分在第4周末才有显著性降低(P＜0.05).治疗第2周末及第4周末,研究组的SDSS总分均显著低于对照组,差异均有显著性(P＜0.05).两组均未出现严重不良反应.结论 艾司西酞普兰合并喹硫平可有效、快速的改善难治性抑郁症患者的抑郁焦虑症状及社会功能.     

阿立哌唑对难治性抑郁症的增效作用

目的：探讨艾司西酞普兰联合阿立哌唑治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效及安全性。方法：62例难治性抑郁症患者随即分为合用组（艾司西酞普兰联合阿立哌唑）32例,单用组（单用艾司西酞普兰）30例,疗程8周。于治疗前和治疗2、4、8周分别用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）及治疗中出现的症状量表（TESS）评定疗效与不良反应。结果：两组HAMD评分较治疗前均显著下降（P〈0.01）;两组不良反应差异无统计学意义（P均〉0.05）。结论：艾司西酞普兰联合阿立哌唑治疗难治性抑郁症疗效明显优于单用艾司西酞普兰,安全性较高。     

艾司西酞普兰联合小剂量奥氮平治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效

目的：探讨艾司西酞普兰联合小剂量奥氮平治疗难治性抑郁症的临床疗效和安全性。方法将80例难治性抑郁症患者随机分成研究组和对照组2组,每组40例,研究组服用艾司西酞普兰和小剂量奥氮平治疗,对照组单用艾司西酞普兰治疗,共观察8周,于治疗前及治疗后1、2、4、6、8周末采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）、汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）评定临床疗效,副反应量表（TESS）记录治疗过程中的不良反应,随访1 a ,观察复发率。结果治疗后2组患者HAMD、HAMA评分均较治疗前显著下降（P＜0.05）,同期研究组评分较对照组下降更显著（P＜0.05）,研究组减分率较对照组更显著（P＜0.05）,第6、8周末HAMD、HAMA评分显示2组间有明显差异（P＜0.01）;8周末研究组有效率83.78％,高于对照组的72.97％（P＜0.05）;2组不良反应评分及1 a内的复发率比较无明显差异（P＞0.05）。结论艾司西酞普兰联合小剂量奥氮平治疗难治性抑郁症起效快,并能迅速改善睡眠障碍和焦虑症状,不会明显增加不良反应,对复发率无明显影响。     

艾司西酞普兰合并无抽搐电休克治疗自杀未遂抑郁症疗效观察

目的 探讨艾司西酞普兰合并无抽搐电休克（MECT）治疗自杀未遂抑郁症患者的疗效.方法 将68例自杀未遂的抑郁症患者随机分为研究组35例和对照组33例,研究组予以艾司西酞普兰合并MECT治疗,对照组单用艾司西酞普兰治疗,共观察28 d,分别于治疗前及治疗后第3、7、14、21、28天予以汉密尔顿抑郁量表17项（HAMD-17）和贝克自杀意念量表（BSI）评定.结果 研究组HAMD、BSI评分在治疗后第3天起即较治疗前显著下降（P＜0.05）,而对照组则在治疗后第7天起较治疗前显著下降（P＜0.05）.研究组在治疗后各个评分点HAMD、BSI评分均低于对照组（P均＜0.05）.结论 艾司西酞普兰合并MECT治疗自杀未遂抑郁症患者疗效确切,起效快,优于单用艾司西酞普兰治疗.     

表达性艺术治疗对抑郁症残留症状疗效随机对照研究

目的 探讨艾司西酞普兰合并表达性艺术治疗对于抑郁症残留症状的疗效.方法 60例单用艾司西酞普兰治疗6周后存在残留症状的抑郁症患者被随机分为研究组（n=30）和对照组（n=30）,分别给予为期4周的艾司西酞普兰合并表达性艺术治疗和单用艾司西酞普兰治疗.在基线期和4周末采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（Hamilton DepressionScale-17,HAMD-17）、汉密尔顿焦虑量表（Hamilton anxiety scale,HAMA）评定疗效.结果 基线期研究组和对照组HAMD-17、HAMA评分无统计学差异（P＞0.05）;治疗后第4周末,研究组HAMD-17减分显著高于对照组（P =0.009）,研究组HAMA减分显著高于对照组（P =0.000）.结论 艾司西酞普兰合并表达性艺术治疗较单用艾司西酞普兰能更好地改善抑郁症的残留症状.     

高频重复经颅磁刺激合并艾司西酞普兰治疗老年难治性抑郁症对照研究

目的 探讨高频重复经颅磁刺激（rTMS）合并艾司西酞普兰对老年难治性抑郁症的治疗价值和安全性.方法 将70例老年抑郁症患者随机分为研究组和对照组各35例,两组患者均服用艾司西酞普兰15 mg/d,疗程4周;研究组合并rTMS治疗.治疗前后使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）、贝克抑郁量表（BDI）、大体功能评定量表（GAF）及匹茨堡睡眠质量指数量表（PSQI）评定疗效.结果 研究组有效率高于对照组（x2=6.97,P＜0.01）.研究组治疗4周后GAF量表评分与治疗前比较显著升高（P＜0.01）,而BDI、HAMD、PSQI量表评分均明显下降（P＜0.01）;对照组治疗4周后HAMD、PSQI量表评分与治疗前比较明显下降（P＜0.01）.治疗后GAF量表研究组评分显著高于对照组（P＜0.01）;而BDI、HAMD、PSQI量表评分研究组显著低于对照组（P＜0.01）.结论 高频重复经颅磁刺激合并艾司西酞普兰治疗老年难治性抑郁症效果明显,无明显不良反应.     

奎硫平对老年期抑郁症的辅助治疗作用

目的:探讨小剂量奎硫平联合西酞普兰治疗老年期抑郁症的疗效和安全性.方法:采用随机开放对照研究,对56例老年期抑郁症患者随机分为合用组与单用组,疗程8周,采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、临床总体印象量表评定症状,Asberg抗抑郁剂不良反应量表评定不良反应.结果:合用组治疗老年期抑郁症的疗效要明显优于单一应用西酞普兰治疗(P<0.05),不良反应两组间无明显差异(P>0.05).结论:小剂量奎硫平联合西酞普兰治疗老年期抑郁症具有安全性,其疗效明显优于单一应用西酞普兰治疗.     

草酸艾司西酞普兰联合喹硫平治疗抑郁症合并高血压患者的疗效与安全性

目的探讨草酸艾司西酞普兰联合喹硫平治疗抑郁症合并高血压患者的疗效与安全性。方法本院2018年5月～2019年5月收治的86例抑郁症合并高血压患者,随机分为常规组(草酸艾司西酞普兰片治疗)、研究组(草酸艾司西酞普兰片联合喹硫平片治疗),各43例。比较两组的疗效和安全性。结果研究组整体疗效高于常规组(P0.05);研究组治疗后24h收缩压、24h舒张压均低于常规组(P0.05);研究组治疗后第2周、第4周、第8周HAMD汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分低于常规组、(P0.05);不良反应总发生率两组无明显差异(P0.05)。结论草酸艾司西酞普兰片与喹硫平联合治疗可以减轻抑郁症合并高血压的患者的抑郁程度、降低血压,而且不良反应少。     

Satisfaction with quality of life varies with temperament types of patients with schizophrenia

We sought to explore the relationships of three temperament factors with domain-specific subjective quality of life (QOL) of patients with schizophrenia. Ninety patients with schizophrenia were evaluated using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Life Satisfaction Questionnaire, the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire, the Positive and Negative Syndromes Scale, the Distress Scale for Adverse Symptoms, the Insight and Treatment Attitudes Questionnaire, the Insight Self-Report Scale, and standardized questionnaires for self-reported emotional distress and stress process-related variables. Predictors of domain-specific QOL were identified using multiple regression techniques. Temperament factors explain 6% to 16% of variability in QOL domain scores among patients with schizophrenia after controlling for the remaining variables (emotional distress, social support, self-esteem, avoidance coping, age, side effects, and depression). We found that higher levels of novelty seeking are associated with better general QOL, physical health, and more positive subjective feelings, whereas higher levels of reward dependence are related to better satisfaction from social relationships. Higher levels of harm avoidance are associated with poorer satisfaction with general activities, and medication. Thus, temperament factors, as assessed by the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire, substantially influence satisfaction with life quality in schizophrenia. Novelty seeking, reward dependence, and harm avoidance are associated with different domains of QOL.     

Compliance with health regimens of adolescents with epilepsy

The purpose of this paper was to describe the compliance of adolescents with epilepsy and some factors connected to it. Altogether 300 individuals with epilepsy aged 13-17 years were randomly selected from the Finnish Social Insurance Institution's register. Every fifth person on the list was included in the sample. Seventy-seven per cent (n= 232) of the selected adolescents with epilepsy returned a questionnaire sent to them relating to compliance. The data were analysed using the SPSS software. Twenty-two per cent of the adolescents with epilepsy felt that they complied fully with their suggested health regimens, while 44% placed themselves in the category of "satisfactory compliance", and the remaining 34% reported poor compliance. Compliance with their recommended life-style was poorest, while the highest degree of compliance was recorded for medication. Background variables, such as the duration of the disease, exercise, smoking, alcohol-intake and the number of seizures, were statistically significantly related to compliance (P< 0.001). Good motivation, a strong sense of normality, experience of results, subjective outcome, energy and will-power, support from parents, physicians and nurses, and a positive attitude towards to the disease and its treatment, no threat to social and emotional well-being and no fears of complications and no fear of seizures explained good compliance (P< 0.001).     

Treatment of patients with tardive dystonia with olanzapine

Tardive dystonia represents a complication of long-term use of neuroleptics and its treatment is often unsatisfactory. Atypical neuroleptics appear to improve tardive dystonia, and cases of tardive dystonia successfully managed with clozapine have been reported. The aim of this open-label video-blinded study was to evaluate the antidystonic efficacy of olanzapine, a new atypical neuroleptic with a low risk of agranulocytosis, in a group of four patients (one man and three women) with tardive cervical dystonia. They developed severe dystonia after several years of neuroleptic treatment. Extensive laboratory evaluations, as well as neurophysiologic and neuroradiologic investigations, were negative. Olanzapine was started at a dose of 5 mg/d and increased up to 7.5 mg/d. All patients were evaluated at baseline and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale, and videotaped. At the end of the trial, the videotapes were reviewed and scored by a blind observer. A self-rating visual analog scale completed the disability evaluation.A moderate to marked improvement in dystonia was observed in all patients, and significant differences were observed in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale scores and videotape ratings after 8 and 12 weeks of treatment compared with the basal values (p < 0.05). The average percentage of improvement in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale score and visual analog scale was 26.4% and 42.6%, respectively. No serious side effects were reported at the maximum dosage reached (7.5 mg/d). This study warrants a larger controlled study to conclusively demonstrate the efficacy of olanzapine in tardive dystonia.     

血管内栓塞治疗未破裂脑动静脉畸形并发癫痫患者的预后分析

目的分析血管内栓塞治疗未破裂脑动静脉畸形(CAVM)并发癫痫患者的预后情况。方法选择2013年3月至2017年6月收治的符合诊断标准的CAVM并发癫痫发作患者49例为研究对象,分析血管内栓塞治疗后患者的临床症状、生活质量(QOLIE-31)改善情况。结果患者经血管内栓塞治疗后,QOLIE-31各项指标(除了药物影响)评分均明显提高,高于治疗前(P0.05);Spetzler-Martin分级与Engel分级的I~II级例数多于治疗前(P0.05),同时Spetzler-Martin分级I~II级生活质量评分(76.04±18.33)分明显高于III~V级的(65.65±16.76)分(P0.05);Engel分级I~II级的生活质量评分(75.25±17.78)分明显高于III~V级的(66.23±13.22)分(P0.05);血管内栓塞比例80%的生活质量总评分(78.37±18.87)分明显高于栓塞比例80%的(64.16±16.92)分(P0.05);术后患者的头疼症状中重度例数明显低于治疗前(P0.01);患者的NIHSS评分和MRS评分均明显低于治疗前,头疼症状的生活质量评分高于治疗前(均P0.05)。结论血管内栓塞能明显改善未破裂脑动静脉畸形并发癫痫患者的头疼症状、癫痫发作情况、神经功能缺损,提高血管内栓塞比例能够提高患者生活质量。