Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Twice-Daily Extended-Release Carbamazepine (CBZ) and Four-Times-Daily Immediate-Release CBZ in Patients with Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: A new capsule dosage form of carbamazepine (CBZ) has been developed, consisting of three different types of beads (immediate-release, extended-release, and enteric-release) that may be taken sprinkled on food or swallowed for easy administration. We compared the pharmacokinetics of the extended-release dosage form of CBZ (Carbatrol capsules) twice daily with the conventional immediate-release formulation of CBZ four times daily.
Methods: The randomized, double-blind, two-way, cross-over study was conducted at two sites, with a planned sample size of 24 adult patients with epilepsy. Each treatment was administered for 2 weeks. At the end of the 2-week period, blood samples were obtained hourly for a 24-h period.
Results: The 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the ratio of the means of the extended-release formulation twice daily to the immediate-release formulation four times daily were within the range of 0.80–1.25 for each of the pharmacokinetic parameters for CBZ and for the summation of CBZ and CBZ-epoxide (CBZ-E). There was no difference in the frequency of seizures between treatment (p = 0.103).
Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that extended-release CBZ twice daily was bioequivalent to immediate-release CBZ four times daily, with regard to CBZ levels and summation of CBZ and CBZ-E levels, based on the pharmacokinetic parameters evaluated. Substituting one formulation for the other did not cause patients to have a significant change in seizure frequency.     

Increasing Plasma Concentration Tolerability Study of Flunarizine in Comedicated Epileptic Patients

Twelve patients with intractable partial seizures [4 receiving carbamazepine (CBZ), 4 phenytoin (PHT), and 4 both] entered a study of the tolerability of flunarizine (FNR) at specified plasma concentrations. After an 8-week baseline period, a single-dose pharmacoki-netic study was performed for each patient to calculate a loading dose and maintenance dosage necessary to achieve a target plasma FNR concentration of 30 ng/ml. The first 8 patients received the loading dose (as divided doses) during a 1-week hospitalization and the maintenance dosage for the ensuing 8 weeks. These patients proceeded to treatment periods with target concentrations of 60 and then 120 ng/ml, using doses based on an assumed linear relation between dose and plasma concentration. The last 4 patients were studied only at the 120-ng/ml target level. Results indicated that this procedure successfully approximated target levels of 30 and 60 ng/ ml, but observed concentrations in the last period exceeded the 120-ng/ml target level and continued to increase with time, often necessitating a dosage reduction owing to intolerability. Calculated doses for a given target concentration varied by a factor of 12. The most frequently reported adverse experiences were sedation and increased fatigue; reports of dizziness, headache, and lethargy were also common. Based on this study, a target concentration of at least 60 but <120 ng/ml is recommended for a controlled clinical trial of the antiepileptic efficacy of FNR.     

Pharmacokinetic and Dose Tolerability Study of ADD 94057 in Comedicated Patients with Partial Seizures

ADD 94057, a metabolite of fluzinamide, manufactured by the A. H. Robins Company, blocks chemically- and electrically-induced seizures in animals. The primary objective of this open add-on study was to evaluate patient tolerability of ADD 94057 at ascending target plasma concentrations. Nine subjects with medically refractory seizures were receiving phenytoin (PHT, 3), carbamazepine (CBZ, 3), or both (3). A pharmacokinetic profile after a single oral 400-mg dose of ADD 94057 was used to calculate ADD 94057 dosages. After a 4-week baseline period, patients were treated for 4 weeks with weekly ADD 94057 dosage escalations. Two patients completed the study at their assigned highest dosage level; the other patients finished the study at lower dosages. The patients receiving PHT (but not CBZ) tolerated higher plasma concentrations of ADD 94057 than did patients receiving CBZ, alone or in combination with PHT. Adverse experiences included headache, ataxia, blurred vision, diplopia, dizziness, lightheadedness, and mild confusion. Eight of nine patients had reductions in seizure frequency from baseline.     

Double-blind crossover trial of lamotrigine (Lamictal) as add-on therapy in intractable epilepsy

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is reported of lamotrigine as add-on treatment in therapy-resistant epilepsy. A within-patients serial design was used, with two 3-month treatment periods and an intervening 6-week washout/crossover period. An unblinded investigator adjusted lamotrigine dosage to achieve a plasma concentration within a previously predicted therapeutic range. All patients had therapy-resistant partial seizures, some in combination with other seizure types and were without serious neurological or intellectual deficit. Of 34 patients recruited only one was withdrawn because of an adverse experience (maculo-papular rash) probably related to the experimental drug and 30 completed the trial. The other 3 withdrawals were due to default during baseline, dispensing error and cholecystectomy. There was a modest statistically significant reduction in total and partial seizures on lamotrigine compared to placebo treatment. There was no difference in adverse experiences or abnormal biochemical or haematological findings between the lamotrigine and placebo periods. The plasma concentrations of concomitantly administered antiepileptic drugs were not affected by lamotrigine treatment. It is concluded that lamotrigine shows promise as an antiepileptic drug with low toxicity.     

Reduction of dosing frequency of carbamazepine with a slow-release preparation

The occurrence of side effects and epileptic seizures and the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine (CBZ) and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide were studied using a slow-release CBZ preparation, Neurotol slow, and a conventional CBZ preparation, Tegretol. The study was an open, randomized cross-over trial, with a 2 week study period for each preparation. Tegretol was given 3 times and Neurotol slow twice a day. The earlier CBZ dose was kept unchanged. The initial sample consisted of 24 adult epileptic patients receiving CBZ treatment of whom 20 patients were evaluable. The fluctuation in serum CBZ concentrations did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment periods, even though the interdose interval of Neurotol slow was 4 h longer than that of Tegretol. The switch-over from conventional CBZ to the slow-release formulation did not seem to alter the efficacy and side effects of CBZ. By using Neurotol slow instead of a conventional CBZ preparation, Tegretol, it is evidently possible to reduce the dosing frequency from 3 times a day to twice daily administrations.     

Carbamazepine Toxicity with Lamotrigine: Pharmacokinetic or Pharmacodynamic Interaction?

Summary: Purpose: To determine whether the toxicity that occurs in some patients when lamotrigine (LTG) is added to carbamazepine (CBZ) is the result of either a pharmacokinetic or a pharmacokinetic or a pharmcodynamic interaction.
Methods: Escalating LTG doses were added to ongoing CBZ treatmcnt in 47 patients. All patients had blood samples collected for drug concentration measurement, including the epoxide metabolite of CBZ, before starting LTG treatment and after stabilising at each dose escalation. Patients also were examined for signs of toxicity.
Results: After LTG was introduced, nine patients demonstrated clinical signs of CNS toxicity, mainly diplopia and diziness. There was no significant (p = 0.05) change in the serum concentrations of either CBZ or its epoxide metabolite when LTG was added either to the group as a whole or to the nine patients who experienced adverse CNS effects. LTG serum concentrations also were below the level at which the common signs of LTG toxicity, such as nausea, vomiting, or unsteadiness, are more likely to occur. In seven of the nine patients who exhibited CNS toxicity. CBZ serum concentrations were >8 mg/L on LTG introduction.
Conclusions: Toxicity is more likely to occur when LTG is added to CBZ if the initial CBZ level is high. typically >8 mg/L. This appears to be the result of a pharmacodynamic interaction. A reduction of CBZ dose usually resolves the toxicity, allowing the LTG dose to be escalated to maximal effect. It is not usually necessary to stop either drug.     

An open study of tolerability and pharmacokinetics of raclopride extended release capsules in psychiatric patients: a Canadian study.

The tolerability and pharmacokinetics of raclopride extended release (ER) capsules have been evaluated after a single oral dose and at steady state, with 3 different daily doses in 4 male patients requiring neuroleptic treatment. In this 3-week open study, the drug was administered to patients in increasing bid doses of 8 mg, 12 mg and 16 mg, respectively, for each 1-week treatment period, following a 1-week placebo washout. With this limited number of patients, assessments of clinical chemistry, hematology, cardiovascular variables and adverse symptoms suggest that raclopride is safe and well-tolerated in the group studied. The administration of repeated doses of raclopride showed linear pharmacokinetics based on parameter values which are either constant (effective elimination half-life, total plasma clearance, and dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve) or varying proportionally (trough plasma concentration, peak plasma concentration, average plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for a dosage interval at steady state) with the doses. The linear 1-compartment open model with zero-order absorption was the most appropriate pharmacokinetic model describing the raclopride plasma concentration profile after a single 8 mg dose of raclopride ER capsules. The ER formulation reduced the fluctuation between peak and trough plasma drug concentrations which has been reported before with instant release dosage forms. In this study, the increase of plasma prolactin concentrations above the normal limit was transient and returned to normal levels. Although the plasma prolactin concentration tended to increase with the drug dose, no direct relationship between raclopride dose and prolactin plasma concentrations was found. The correlation of plasma prolactin response with the plasma raclopride concentration showed a low level of hysteresis.     

Comparative bioavailability of carbamazepine from two slow-release preparations.

In order to compare the multiple-dose bioavailability of carbamazepine (CBZ) from 2 slow-release preparations, Neurotol slow and Tegretol Retard, a single-blind, randomized, cross-over study was carried out. 21 adult patients with epilepsy were enrolled in the study. At the end of both 2-week treatment periods, a blood sample series was drawn after the administration of the morning CBZ dose. The serum concentrations of CBZ, CBZ-10,11-epoxide (CBZE) and 10,11-dihydro-10,11-trans-dihydroxy-CBZ (CBZD) were measured using HPLC. The mean bioavailability of CBZ from Neurotol slow was 11% (P = 0.002) higher than from Tegretol Retard. Owing to the better bioavailability, the peak (Cmax), lowest (Cmin) and mean (Css) concentrations of CBZ were also significantly higher during Neurotol slow treatment. Fluctuation of serum CBZ concentrations (Cmax-Cmin/Css, ADCss/AUC0-12h) did not differ significantly between the 2 treatments; neither did tmax. Similar results were obtained with CBZE and CBZD. There were more epileptic seizures on Tegretol Retard than on Neurotol slow, but the difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that there are significant differences in the bioavailability of CBZ from these 2 slow-release preparations.     

Pharmacokinetic comparison of two carbamazepine slow-release formulations

In a single-blind pharmacokinetic study patients being treated with conventional carbamazepine (CBZ) in a t.i.d. regimen were randomly allocated to identical doses of two CBZ slow-release formulations (Trimonil Retard and Tegretol Retard) administered once daily. Statistical analysis involved the following parameters: AUC, Cmin, Cmax and Fluctuation Index (FI). With regard to Cmin and FI statistically significant differences in favour of Tegretol Retard were observed.     

Carbamazepine-risperidone interactions in patients with epilepsy

Because concomitant administration of psychoactive and antiepileptic drugs is increasing progressively in neurologic and psychiatric practice, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interactions between risperidone (RISP) and carbamazepine (CBZ) plasma concentrations in a group of patients with epilepsy with behavioral disturbances. The authors assessed eight patients on CBZ monotherapy (CBZ extended-release capsules) at a mean dosage of 625 +/- 253 mg/day (range, 400-1,200 mg/day) for at least 1 year. RISP (1 mg in one daily dose) was added to CBZ therapy for the occurrence of behavior disturbances. CBZ blood levels were assessed before (T0), 24 hours after (T1), and 2 weeks after (T2) RISP administration. Steady-state plasma concentrations of CBZ increased from 6.67 +/- 0.41 microg/mL at baseline to 7.37 +/- 0.59 microg/mL (p < 0.01) at T1, to 7.95 +/- 0.47 microg/mL (p < 0.0001) at T2. The pharmacokinetic data suggest either a possible role of RISP in inhibiting the cytochrome P450 microsomal enzyme system (CYP)-3A4 pathway or a potential role of CYP2D6 in CBZ metabolism.     

Oxcarbazepine (GP 47.680): A Possible Alternative to Carbamazepine?

A double-blind randomized crossover design trial of carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OCBZ) was performed with 48 in-patients with epilepsy. All were stabilized on polytherapy including CBZ and had at least two seizures per week. CBZ was replaced by the trial medication. Each trial period started with a titration, followed by a 12-week steady state. Concomitant medications were kept constant during the trial. The criteria for assessment were seizure fit frequency and severity; tolerability; hematology and blood chemistry; plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs; EEG; cardiovascular parameters; and treatment preference. The following differences regarding OCBZ were detected: 9% reduction of the total number of seizures, with a significant reduction of tonic-clonic (20%) and tonic (31%) seizures; increased alertness and concentration ability in five patients; an allergic skin reaction with CBZ that completely disappeared in two patients while receiving OCBZ; an increase of valproate and phenytoin plasma levels in a number of patients, probably caused by reduced enzyme induction; a slight but significant reduction of serum Na, not causing clinical symptoms; less seizures than in the CBZ period in 25 patients (52%); and a preference for OCBZ in 23 patients (48%). We consider OCBZ at least as effective as CBZ with a slightly better tolerability. In severe cases, the wider therapeutic window might improve seizure control.     

Evaluation of the biological availability of 2 carbamazepine preparations

The biological availability was determined of two carbamazepine preparations: Amizepin POLFA and Tegretol GEIGY in tablets. The study was carried out in 10 patients giving them the drug in doses of 400 mg by the crossover method at an interval of 3 weeks. The statistical analysis of the mean maximal values, mean times of reaching of maximal concentrations, and mean areas under the curve of serum carbamazepine concentration changes for both forms of the drug showed a comparable biological availability of Amizepin and Tegretol. The relative degree of bioavailability of Amizepin amounted to 98% of that of Tegretol. The values of pharmacokinetic parameters of both drugs were compared. The value of distribution volume was greater in the case of Tegretol, and the difference was statistically significant. No significant differences were found between the remaining calculated parameters.     

Once-daily extended-release levetiracetam as adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients with epilepsy: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Purpose:   Double-blind randomized trial to assess efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended-release levetiracetam (LEV XR) tablets (2 × 500 mg) as add-on therapy in patients (12–70 years old) with partial-onset seizures (POS) refractory to one to three antiepileptic drugs.
Methods:   After an 8-week prospective baseline-period, eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to once-daily LEV XR 1,000 mg/day or placebo for 12 weeks. Evaluations included changes from baseline in POS-frequency/week, responders (≥50% reduction in POS-frequency/week), seizure-freedom, adverse events, laboratory tests, physical and neurologic examinations, vital signs, body-weight, and 12-lead electrocardiogram.
Results:   Of 188 patients screened, 158 were randomized (intention-to-treat population): LEV XR (n = 79) or placebo (n = 79). Seventy-one (89.9%) LEV XR and 72 (91.1%) placebo patients completed the trial. Median POS-frequency/week reduction was 46.1% on LEV XR and 33.4% on placebo. Estimated reduction with LEV XR over placebo was 14.4% (p   =   0.038). Thirty-four (43%) LEV XR and 23 (29.1%) placebo patients experienced ≥50% reduction in POS-frequency/week. Eight (10.1%) patients receiving LEV XR and one (1.3%) receiving placebo were free of POS during the 12-week treatment period. Forty-one (53.2%) LEV XR and 43 (54.4%) placebo patients reported ≥1 adverse event. Adverse events reported with an incidence >5% and seen more often with LEV XR than with placebo were somnolence, influenza, irritability, nasopharyngitis, dizziness, and nausea .
Discussion:   Once-daily LEV XR 1,000 mg was effective and well-tolerated as adjunct therapy in patients with POS. Ten percent of patients randomized to LEV XR experienced freedom from POS. These results support the clinical value of this new LEV XR formulation.     

Mutual Interaction Between Remacemide Hydrochloride and Carbamazepine: Two Drugs with Active Metabolites

Summary: Purpose: We wished to determine mutual interaction of two drugs with active metabolism: remacemide, hydrochloride and carbamazepine (CBZ).
Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study of add-on remacemide hydrochloride was performed in 10 of 14 recruited patients being treated with CBZ monotherapy. Forty-eight-hour concentration profiles of CBZ, its active epoxide metabolite (CBZ-E), remacemide, and its desglycinyl metabolite (ARL12495XX) were assayed after single and multiple dosing.
Results: After patients were treated with 300 mg remacemide hydrochloride twice daily for 14 days, the mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of CBZ was increased by 22% (p = 0.12), C_max was increased by 27% (p = 0.07), and C_min was increased by 22% (p = 0.29). Trough concentrations of CBZ were higher (p = 0.0037) during active treatment as compared with placebo treatment. CBZ-E levels were unaffected. No symptoms of CBZ toxicity were reported. There was no evidence of autoinduction of remacemide metabolism. However, in CBZ-treated patients, the AUC of remacemide and its active metabolite was 60 and 30%, respectively, of values observed in healthy volunteers treated previously with the same dose.
Conclusions: Remacemide hydrochloride inhibits CBZ metabolism, which itself induces that of remacemide hydrochloride and its active metabolite. This mutual interaction between remacemide hydrochloride and CBZ is predictable and modest and should not present a barrier to their clinical use in combination.     

Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Topiramate and Carbamazepine in Patients with Epilepsy During Monotherapy and Concomitant Therapy

Summary: Purpose: We studied the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile of topiramate (TPM) as a function of dose and the effects of comedication with carbamazepine (CBZ). Methods: We enrolled 12 patients with partial epilepsy receiving chronic stable doses of CBZ 300–800 mg every 8 h. In a 6-week period, TPM was added and doses were increased at -2-week intervals from 100 to 200 to 400 mg every 12 h and stabilized at the highest tolerated dose to as high as 400 mg every 12 h. CBZ was tapered in the next 4 weeks when possible, and TPM was maintained as monotherapy at the highest stabilized dose for 2 more weeks. Plasma and urine samples were collected before TPM dosing, after each TPM dose increase, and during TPM monotherapy. Results: Dose-normalized results (n = 10) for TPM area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC_(0–12)), C_min(0), and C_avg indicated that TPM exhibits linear plasma pharmacokinetics over the dose range of 100- to 400-mg every 12 h when administered with CBZ. Mean TPM AUC_(0–12)) C_max, C_min(0), and C_avg values were -40% lower during CBZ treatment as compared with those during TPM monotherapy (n = 3). TPM oral and nonrenal clearance rates were approximately two- to threefold higher, whereas TPM renal clearance was unchanged during concomitant CBZ treatment (n = 3). There were no significant changes in total and unbound CBZ and CBZ-epoxide (CBZ-E) pharmacokinetics during TPM administration (n = 10). TPM pharmacokinetics during concomitant CBZ treatment were significantly different from those during TPM monotherapy, suggesting that metabolic clearance of TPM increases when CBZ is coadministered. Conclusions: When CBZ is reduced or discontinued, TPM doses may need to be lowered to maintain equivalent plasma concentrations. Adjusting the CBZ dose for pharmacokinetic reasons when TPM is administered as adjunctive treatment does not appear to be necessary.     

Carbamazepine Dose Requirements During Stiripentol Therapy: Influence of Cytochrome P-450 Inhibition Stiripentol

The inhibitory effect of stiripentol (STP) on disposition of carbamazepine (CBZ) and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (CBZE) was quantitated to establish CBZ dosage reduction guidelines for future clinical add-on efficacy trials of STP. In seven epileptic patients, STP (1,500-3,000 mg/day for 2 weeks) inhibited CBZ clearance by 50 +/- 16% (p = 0.001) and reduced the CBZE/CBZ plasma ratio by 45 +/- 14% (p = 0.0005). The inhibitory effect was gradually manifested over a period of 7-10 days after initiation of STP therapy. In contrast to inhibition of CBZE formation, STP had no effect (p greater than 0.05) on elimination clearance or half-life (t1/2) of CBZE in six healthy volunteers. STP most likely exerts inhibitory effects through inhibition of cytochrome P-450. This hypothesis was confirmed in the present study by the finding that a therapeutic concentration of STP (7 micrograms/mL) inhibited 10,11-epoxidation of CBZ in human liver microsomes by 40-50%. On the basis of results from this study, we propose that (a) CBZ dosage should be reduced in steps over a period of 7-10 days after initiation of STP, and (b) a CBZ dosage of 4.3 to 8.7 mg/kg/day will maintain therapeutic CBZ plasma levels of 5-10 micrograms/mL.     

Comparison of Steady-State Blood Levels of Two Carbamazepine Formulations

The steady-state plasma level produced by brand-name carbamazepine (CBZ) (Tegretol, Ciba-Geigy) was compared with a generic formulation (Parke-Davis) in 10 subjects with partial epilepsy in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial. In addition, seizure frequency and clinical and laboratory signs of toxicity were evaluated. Our results failed to show any difference in CBZ blood levels, seizure frequency, or clinical or laboratory signs of toxicity in patients receiving either the brand-name or generic formulation.     

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Lamotrigine and Other Antiepileptic Drugs in Children with Intractable Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose : We wished to determine the oral pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine LTG and to assess possible interactions with other AEDs in an unselected population of children. Concentration data in plasma and in CSF for lamotrigine as well as for the other AEDs are presented.
Methods : Thirty-one children, children and young adults aged > 2 years with intractable generalized epilepsy despite adequate duration and dose of at least three conventional AEDs were studied.
Results : There was a linear relation between the dose administered and the maximal plasma concentration, indicating that saturation of absorption or elimination mechanisms did not occur in the dose range studied. The median elimination half-life (t1/2) in patients receiving concomitant valproate (VPA) was 43.3 h; in patients receiving carbamazepine (CBZ) and/or phenobarbital (PB), it was 14.1 h; and in patients receiving both VPA and CBZI PB or other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), it was 28.9 h. No clinically important changes in the plasma levels of CBZ, VPA, valproate, ethosuximide, or PB were observed in the follow-up period (2–12 months). No dose adjustments of concomitant AEDs were necessary. The plasma concentration of clonazepam (CZP) was reduced when LTG was introduced.
Conclusions : The complex interaction between LTG and other AEDs in children with intractable epilepsy makes therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) desirable.     

Diurnal variation of carbamazepine and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide in plasma and saliva in children with epilepsy: a comparison between conventional and slow-release formulations

In order to overcome the problems of interdosage fluctuations of body fluid concentrations of carbamazepine, a slow-release formulation has been developed. In an open, controlled, within-patient study, the diurnal plasma concentrations of carbamazepine and its 10,11-epoxide were measured in 25 epileptic children first treated with conventional carbamazepine tablets (Tegretol) and then with the Tegretol slow-release preparation. The diurnal plasma concentration curves during treatment with the slow-release formulation showed significantly less variation over 24 hours than during treatment with the ordinary preparation, as measured by the fluctuation index. Mean concentration values also differed significantly, which is explained by a somewhat reduced bioavailability (22% less) of the slow-release formulation. There were no differences in efficacy and tolerability between the two formulations, but there was a clear-cut reduction of reported side effects, especially tiredness, on treatment with the slow-release formulation. For that reason, the slow-release formulation should be a major advantage in treating children with epilepsy, in order to avoid interference with cognitive functions. In 12 children, simultaneous measurements of the concentration of carbamazepine and its epoxide in saliva were made and compared with the plasma values. As expected, the concentration curves corresponded, indicating that saliva sampling is an appropriate alternative for monitoring the concentration of carbamazepine. All children remained on the slow-release preparation after the trial and were followed up for 12 months or more.     

Criteria to Assess In Vivo Performance and Bioequivalence of Generic Controlled-Release Formulations of Carbamazepine

Summary: Purpose: Concern persists that the criteria used to establish bioequivalence of generic drugs may not adequately guarantee the interchangeability of antiepileptic medications (AEDs), particularly controlled-release (CR) formulations. We examined the utilization of several new parameters, in addition to AUC, peak plasma concentration (C_max), and time to reach C_max (t_max), for the assessment of bioequivalence and in vivo performance of CBZ and other CR products. These new parameters may offer additional information for evaluation of CR products that yield a prominent plateau in the plasma time-concentration curve. They include mean residence time (MRT), C_max/AUC, plateau time or POT (the time span associated with the concentrations within 25% of C_max), t_apical, and C_apical, (the arithmetic mean of the POT times and concentrations within 25% of C_max respectively). Additional parameters for multiple-dose studies include the percentage fluctuation and the flatness of the steady state-concentration curve. Methods: These proposed parameters were used in two recent (single and multiple dose) two-way crossover studies of a new CR product of CBZ (Teril 400 CR) in comparison with Tegretol CR Divitab. Results: Teril 400 CR was found to be bioequivalent to Tegretol CR Divitab, by using both the classic and the additional proposed parameters. Both CBZ CR products have similar rates of absorption and similar flatness of their plasma time-concentration curves as assessed by visual inspection and the proposed parameters. Conclusions: The additional parameters examined may supplement the traditional single-point parameters, C_max and t_max for assessment of rate of absorption and the flatness of the concentration curve. Their potential benefit and practical utility was confirmed in these two studies. Absorption-rate assessment is important in light of concentration-related side effects associated with CBZ therapy and the impact of fluctuations and the flatness of the CBZ plasma concentration curve on the drug efficacy and tolerability.