Construct validity for alcohol dependence as indicated by the SUDDS-IV

OBJECTIVE: This study considers the diagnostic construct validity of the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-lV) for "alcohol dependence". Previous reports have indicated that "dependence" constitutes a more distinct and pronounced syndrome than "alcohol abuse". METHOD: Data were collected in 2000-2001 on 1340 male and female inmates evaluated for "substance use disorders" using the SUDDS-IV, a detailed structured diagnostic interview, to collect data on all of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for "abuse" and "dependence". RESULTS: Dependent individuals tended to produce distinct and extensive symptom profiles that distinguished them from individuals without a diagnosis or those meeting abuse criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol dependence as defined by the DSM-IV appears to be quite distinct from abuse and can be identified unequivocally for the majority of dependent cases.     

Prevalence of DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol,cocaine, opioid,and cannabis use disorders in a largely substance dependent sample

BackgroundThe fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) will soon replace the DSM-IV, which has existed for nearly two decades. The changes in diagnostic criteria have important implications for research and for the clinical care of individuals with Substance Use Disorders (SUDs).MethodsWe used the Semi-Structured Assessment for Drug Dependence and Alcoholism to evaluate the lifetime presence of DSM-IV abuse and dependence diagnoses and DSM-5 mild, moderate, or severe SUDs for alcohol, cocaine, opioids, and cannabis in a sample of 7,543 individuals recruited to participate in genetic studies of substance dependence.ResultsSwitches between diagnostic systems consistently resulted in a modestly greater prevalence for DSM-5 SUDs, based largely on the assignment of DSM-5 diagnoses to DSM-IV “diagnostic orphans” (i.e., individuals meeting one or two criteria for dependence and none for abuse, and thus not receiving a DSM-IV SUD diagnosis). The vast majority of these diagnostic switches were attributable to the requirement that only two of 11 criteria be met for a DSM-5 SUD diagnosis. We found evidence to support the omission from DSM-5 of the legal criterion due to its limited diagnostic utility. The addition of craving as a criterion in DSM-5 did not substantially affect the likelihood of an SUD diagnosis.ConclusionThe greatest advantage of DSM-5 for the diagnosis of SUDs appears to be its ability to capture diagnostic orphans. In this sample, changes reflected in DSM-5 had a minimal impact on the prevalence of SUD diagnoses.     

Using cluster analysis of alcohol use disorders to investigate 'diagnostic orphans': subjects with alcohol dependence symptoms but no diagnosis

The purpose of this paper is to examine the characteristics of community subjects with one or two alcohol dependence symptoms who did not satisfy the criteria for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) alcohol dependence or abuse (sub-diagnostic group or diagnostic orphans). Variables not included in the DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence criteria are used to compare the different alcohol statuses. The results indicate that the sub-diagnostic group ‘diagnostic orphans’ formed a cluster distinct from that of the non-problem drinkers group, and appeared to be closer to those with alcohol abuse than to those with alcohol dependence. The diagnosis of DSM-IV alcohol dependence (with three, four, or five or more symptoms) appeared to be its own entity. The findings lend credence to the requirement of three symptoms (in any 12 months) for the diagnosis of alcohol dependence in DSM-IV. However, those with one or two symptoms of alcohol dependence should be considered along with alcohol abuse as an entity in future DSM classifications.     

Diagnostic orphans: comparing self-report lifetime course to groups with DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence

Research has highlighted the significant alcohol symptoms and mental health problems experienced by diagnostic orphans - individuals who experience 1-2 criteria of DSM-IV alcohol dependence but do not meet the criteria for a DSM-IV alcohol use disorder. This study used a sub-sample (n=34827) from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), and formed mutually exclusive groups to compare the self-report retrospective course of diagnostic orphans to individuals with DSM-IV abuse and dependence. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to examine the associations between the groups and a range of demographic and clinical variables. Collectively, the findings demonstrate that diagnostic orphans shared similar characteristics to the abuse and dependence groups, but appeared to experience specific comorbid mental health problems. Orphan status has the potential to be a persistent condition and may result in significant dysfunction. In conclusion, diagnostic orphans represent a distinct group that may benefit from cost-effective treatment or intervention, designed to prevent the escalation of alcohol symptoms.     

Diagnostic orphans for alcohol use disorders in a treatment-seeking psychiatric sample

Individuals who endorse one or two of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criterion items for alcohol dependence but do not meet criteria for either alcohol abuse or dependence have been referred to in the literature as "diagnostic orphans." The goal of the present study is to compare diagnostic orphans for alcohol use disorders (AUD) to patients with lifetime DSM-IV alcohol abuse, alcohol dependence, and those with no-AUD symptoms on a series of demographic, diagnostic, and clinical measures. Participants were treatment-seeking psychiatric outpatients (n=1793; 61.5% women) who completed an in-depth, face-to-face diagnostic evaluation for DSM-IV axis I and axis II disorders. Results revealed that diagnostic orphans were younger, had a higher frequency of family history positive for alcoholism, and higher rates of cannabis dependence, as compared to the no-AUD symptoms group. Diagnostic orphans differed significantly from patients with alcohol abuse and dependence on a number of demographic, diagnostic, and clinical measures. Most notably, on a lifetime basis, diagnostic orphans were less likely to meet diagnostic criteria for various substance use disorders, as compared to individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. Taken together, these results generally do not support combining diagnostic orphans to individuals with alcohol abuse.     

Diagnosing alcohol abuse in alcohol dependent individuals: Diagnostic and clinical implications

In DMS-IV, the diagnosis of alcohol abuse is precluded by the diagnosis of alcohol dependence. The goal of this study was to examine the diagnostic and clinical implications of diagnosing alcohol abuse among alcohol dependent individuals. Treatment-seeking psychiatric outpatients with a lifetime history of alcohol dependence (n = 544), some of whom (n = 45) did not meet lifetime criteria for alcohol abuse completed in-depth, face-to-face, semi-structured clinical assessments of DSM-IV axis I and axis II psychopathology. Alcohol dependent patients who did not meet criteria for alcohol abuse were significantly more likely to be female, have a later age of onset for alcohol dependence, have fewer dependence symptoms, and have a lower rate of positive family history for alcoholism, and were less likely to report a lifetime history of DSM-IV drug use disorders and PTSD. These findings suggest that diagnosing alcohol abuse among alcohol dependent patients may be clinically useful as an index of severity and higher likelihood of comorbid drug abuse and dependence. Future studies are needed to establish whether these differences are clinically significant in terms of the course of the disorder and response to treatment.     

The 5-year course of alcohol abuse among young adults

Purpose: This study describes the course of alcohol abuse among a nationally representative sample of young adults over a 5-year time period for the purpose of examining the validity of the DSM-IV alcohol abuse category. Methods: DSM-IV diagnoses of alcohol abuse at baseline and follow-up were examined using logistic regression analyses. Results: Alcohol abuse and dependence were shown to have different courses. Very few abusers at Time 1 became dependent at Time 2, suggesting that abuse is not merely prodromal to dependence. Females, Blacks, and high school dropouts were less likely to receive an abuse diagnosis at baseline. Marital status, family history, earlier onset of drinking, and heavy drinking were also related to abuse at baseline. Alcohol abuse at baseline, in addition to gender, marital status, family history, early onset drinking, and heavy drinking, predicted abuse at follow-up. Exclusion of the hazardous criterion item “driving after drinking too much” from the abuse diagnosis yielded similar results. Discussion: The DSM-IV alcohol abuse category was shown to have some diagnostic utility.     

Are subthreshold alcohol dependence symptoms a risk factor for developing DSM-IV alcohol use disorders? A three-year prospective study of ‘diagnostic orphans’ in a national sample

Aims

Research suggests that diagnostic orphans (i.e., individuals experiencing only 1–2 criteria for DSM-IV alcohol dependence) may be at increased risk for developing more severe alcohol problems. This study aimed to: (i) investigate the course of diagnostic orphans in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), and (ii) explore whether a specific symptom endorsement pattern(s) could identify diagnostic orphans at Wave 1 who remitted or progressed to alcohol dependence at Wave 2.

Methods

Current drinkers (n = 15,751) were divided into diagnostic groups at Waves 1 and 2: no-alcohol use disorder (AUD); one-criterion orphans, two-criterion orphans, alcohol abuse, or alcohol dependence. Multinomial logistic regression analysis explored the association between diagnostic status at Wave 1 and Wave 2. Chi-square tests investigated differences in the criteria endorsement patterns of diagnostic orphans.

Results

Compared to the no-AUD group, one-criterion orphans at Wave 1 were twice as likely to be in the abuse group and four times more likely to be dependent at Wave 2. Two-criterion orphans were three times more likely to be in the abuse group and eight times more likely to have progressed to dependence. Criterion endorsement patterns of diagnostic orphans at baseline did not significantly differentiate between those who remitted and those who progressed to dependence at follow-up.

Conclusions

Like previous research, diagnostic orphans are at increased for developing to more severe alcohol problems. Relying solely on the DSM-IV AUD diagnostic criteria, however, may not be sufficient to identify those diagnostic orphans who are at risk for progressing to dependence.     

A Comparison of DSM-IV Versus DSM-5 Substance Use Disorder Diagnoses in Adolescent Populations

ABSTRACT

Most of the considerations for changes to the diagnostic criteria for substance use disorders have focused on adults. This study compares the diagnostic determinations for substance use disorders with the former Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) versus the current DSM-5 diagnostic criteria among samples of adolescents likely to be evaluated. The DSM-5 has three classifications (mild, moderate, and severe) based on the number of positive findings for 11 diagnostic criteria as opposed to the abuse versus dependence distinction of the DSM-IV-TR. The new criteria replace the criterion of legal problems with one of craving and compulsion to use. The sample consists of 571 males and 333 females who are evaluated either in the juvenile justice system or upon presenting for an evaluation at addiction treatment programs. Results revealed that relatively few cases with no current diagnosis will receive a diagnosis with the new criteria. Similarly, more than 90% of those with a dependence diagnosis fall into the “severe” DSM-5 designation. The most variation will occur for those with a current diagnosis of abuse. Few individuals were “diagnostic orphans” having some dependence indications but no diagnosis with the DSM-IV-TR. Most of these cases do not receive a DSM-5 diagnosis. Results also show that the individual criterion vary widely in whether they indicate a serious condition.     

'Diagnostic orphans' among young adult cannabis users: persons who report dependence symptoms but do not meet diagnostic criteria

OBJECTIVE: To examine the characteristics of 'diagnostic orphans' among cannabis users-those who report one or two symptoms of DSM-IV dependence but do not meet diagnostic criteria for DSM-IV abuse or dependence. METHOD: Data were collected from a representative population cohort of 1601 young adults aged 20-21 years. Those who reported that they had used cannabis at least weekly at some point within the past year were assessed for symptoms of DSM-IV cannabis abuse and dependence using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. RESULTS: Approximately 2.8% of the cohort could be classified as diagnostic orphans, with another 3.0 and 7.5% meeting criteria for abuse and dependence, respectively. Diagnostic orphans were: similar to those who met criteria for cannabis abuse or dependence in terms of demographic characteristics; similar to those who met criteria for cannabis abuse in terms of cannabis use patterns; and similar to those who met criteria for abuse and dependence in their rates of heavy alcohol use and DSM-IV alcohol dependence. However, they did not appear to have elevated rates of illicit drug use or mental health problems compared to non users. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic orphans reported using cannabis in a manner similar to persons meeting criteria for cannabis abuse, and had similar rates of alcohol dependence and other illicit drug use. Strict adherence to DSM-IV diagnoses of abuse and dependence may overlook a substantial proportion of young persons who experience cannabis-related problems. There is a need to consider (a) subthreshold levels of cannabis-related problems among those seeking treatment for other problems; and (b) interventions for this group to prevent escalation of such problems.     

Screening and Diagnosis of “Alcohol Abuse and Dependence” in Older Adults

A literature review reveals that research is warranted to improve screening for “alcohol abuse” in older adults and women. An examination of diagnostic criteria for “alcohol abuse dependence” reveals that older adults provide unique challenges to classification systems. There is a need to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of several new screening instruments for the identification of “alcohol abuse” in the elderly. Routine screening of elderly and women presenting in primary care settings should be a priority for researchers and clini cians.     

A five-year prospective study of diagnostic orphans for alcohol use disorders

OBJECTIVE: One consequence of the DSM-IV diagnostic system for substance abuse and dependence is that there are individuals who might endorse one or two of the criterion items for dependence but not meet criteria for abuse. These persons have been referred to as "diagnostic orphans." The aim of the analyses presented here is to further understanding about this potentially important group. METHOD: The DSM-IV categorical approach was used to determine alcohol-related diagnoses for 439 young adult men. Structured face-to-face follow-up interviews were administered 5 years later. RESULTS: At the beginning of the evaluation period, 14.6% (n = 64) of the men were alcohol dependent, 18.2% (n = 80) fulfilled criteria for alcohol abuse, 16.4% (n = 72) did not meet criteria for an alcohol use disorder but endorsed one or two of the dependence criteria and 50.8% (n = 223) reported none of the dependence items. At the initial interview, and again 5 years later, the diagnostic orphans reported alcohol and drug use histories that fell between the histories of those with dependence and those with no alcohol-related difficulties. The orphans were most similar to the men with abuse, although they had lower quantities and frequencies of alcohol use, endorsed fewer additional alcohol-related problems and reported less involvement with drugs compared with that group. CONCLUSIONS: Although the diagnostic orphans were more similar to the subjects with alcohol abuse than they were to those with dependence or no diagnosis, the data do not necessarily support combining the orphans with those with abuse. These diagnostic orphans do, however, constitute an important group that carries an enhanced risk for alcohol use disorders and should be closely followed.     

Measures of Substance Consumption Among Substance Users, DSM-IV Abusers, and Those With DSM-IV Dependence Disorders in a Nationally Representative Sample

ABSTRACT. Objective: Neither the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised (DSM-III-R), nor the DSM-IV uses measures of substance consumption as part of the diagnostic criteria for substance use disorders. Therefore, this report examined the extent to which frequency and/or quantity of consumption across a broad spectrum of substances are associated with DSM-IV diagnoses of specific substance use disorders and whether there are informative hierarchical levels of consumption among users, abusers, and those who are substance dependent in the U.S. general population. Method: The analyses focused on consumption data from respondents of the 2001-2002 National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Disorders. Multinomial logistic regression was used to predict DSM-IV diagnoses of dependence or abuse based on the continuous consumption measures. Results: Among individuals who used substances, the substances with the greatest liability for dependence were nicotine first and cocaine second. For nearly all substances investigated, users without specific substance use disorders demonstrated lower levels of quantity and frequency of consumption relative to those with DSM-IV abuse and dependence disorders. Dose-response curves for the log odds of abuse and dependence suggested unidimensionality of abuse and dependence for frequency of alcohol drinking; frequency of cannabis use; frequency of opioid use; frequency of hallucinogen use; and, to a lesser extent, frequency of amphetamine use. However, the dose-response curves for the quantity of alcohol consumed demonstrated differential patterns for abuse and dependence such that alcohol dependence has a distinctly greater "quantity of use" relationship than that found among alcohol-abusing individuals. Conclusions: These results confirm the findings of others concerning the unidimensionality of abuse and dependence diagnoses when consumption variables alone are examined and suggest that consumption measures may be useful metrics gauging severity. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 73, 820-828, 2012).     

Past year treatment status and alcohol abuse symptoms among US adults with alcohol dependence

Objective

We tested whether the number and type of alcohol abuse symptoms were associated with an increased likelihood of treatment seeking among respondents with alcohol dependence.

Methods

Data from 4027 adult respondents from 2006 and 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) who met DSM-IV criteria for the past year alcohol dependence were used. Respondents were classified according to the number of past year alcohol abuse symptoms endorsed, as well as type of abuse symptom. Associations were estimated using weighted multivariate logistic regressions that controlled for severity of alcohol dependence, other drug use disorders and other characteristics.

Results

Twenty-eight percent of individuals with alcohol dependence had one alcohol abuse symptom, 20% had two and 19% had three or four. Individuals with more alcohol abuse symptoms differed from those without alcohol abuse symptoms in a number of sociodemographic characteristics and severity of alcohol and drug dependence. Even after adjusting for these factors, individuals with three or four alcohol abuse symptoms had 2.67 times increased odds of treatment seeking, as compared to those without alcohol abuse symptoms [95% CI = 1.65–4.30]. However, individuals with one or two alcohol abuse symptoms were no more likely to seek treatment than those without alcohol abuse symptoms. Majority of those with one or two alcohol abuse symptoms endorsed the hazardous abuse symptom.

Conclusion

Alcohol abuse symptoms are important factors for treatment seeking in individuals with alcohol dependence, but only among certain subset of individuals with three or four alcohol abuse symptoms. Examining structural and psychosocial differences across these subgroups may help inform and reduce barriers to treatment seeking among this population.     

Bipolar Disorder in a Population of Adolescents with Alcohol Use Disorders

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this paper is to present the prevalence of Bipolar Disorder (BPD) in a population of adolescents and young adults with alcohol use disorders (AUD) and to compare salient alcohol use, mood, and diagnostic variables between adolescents with BPD, those with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), and those with AUD without a mood disorder.

Methods: The subjects were 452 adolescents and young adults, age 12.9 to 28.3 years, who met DSM-IV criteria for a lifetime history of either alcohol abuse or alcohol dependence. DSM-IV psychiatric and AUD diagnoses were obtained by semi-structure interviews (K-SADS and SCID) to discern the possible effect of comorbid BPD on alcohol and other drug variables, we compared adolescents or young adults who met DSM-IV criteria for concurrent BPD and AUD with adolescents with MDD plus AUD and those with AUD and no mood disorder. Following one-way ANOVA comparing across the 3 groups, we proceeded with post hoc analysis comparing the BPD+AUD group with either the MDD + AUD or AUD only group.

Results: 6.4% of the subjects met criteria for BPD. While there were no differences between groups on the alcohol consumption variables, subjects with BPD had a significantly earlier onset of an AUD diagnosis than either the MDD group or the AUD only group. The BPD + AUD group had a significantly greater percentage of subjects meeting criteria for alcohol dependence than the AUD only group.

Conclusions: Comorbid mood disorders, particularly Bipolar Disorder, may have an important effect on alcohol and substance use variables and diagnosis. More research is needed to determine the effect of treatments for mood disorder on both mood and substance use variables.     

Dependence symptoms but no diagnosis: diagnostic `orphans' in a community sample

To receive a DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol dependence, an individual must manifest at least three out of seven possible dependence criteria. Thus, individuals may manifest one or two dependence criteria yet not receive the dependence diagnosis. In a sense, these latter individuals may be seen as diagnostic `orphans', since they have individual symptoms of dependence but no diagnoses. A study of these individuals sheds light on the validity of the three-symptom severity threshold for a diagnosis of DSM-IV alcohol dependence. Thus, we investigated the meaning of the `orphan' status through cross-sectional and longitudinal research in a general population sample. Three groups were compared at baseline, subjects with no symptoms of any alcohol use disorder (148), diagnostic `orphans' with one or two symptoms of dependence (136) and subjects who met full criteria for DSM-IV alcohol dependence (140). Several variables significantly differentiated the three groups, including binge drinking and family history of alcoholism. At a 1-year follow-up point, very few of the `orphans' met criteria for DSM-IV alcohol dependence. The proportion of new onsets from the `orphan' group and the group with no symptoms did not differ significantly. Binge drinking predicted chronicity of `orphan' status, but family history of alcoholism did not. The results support the decision to require a minimum of three symptoms to make a diagnosis of alcohol dependence.     

DSM-IV alcohol abuse: investigation in a sample of at-risk drinkers in the community

OBJECTIVE: Although a category for alcohol abuse has been included in the major nomenclatures since DSM-III, many questions have been raised about the definitions and validity of this category. METHOD: We investigated DSM-IV alcohol abuse in 628 at-risk drinkers residing in households who never met criteria for DSM-IV alcohol dependence at the time of a baseline interview. Cross-sectional and prospective longitudinal information were used. RESULTS: Subjects most often met criteria for abuse with the single criterion, recurrent hazardous use (usually driving after drinking too much, on average 4.5 times per year). Younger and white subjects were more likely to receive the abuse diagnosis at baseline, as were drug users and those who drank five or more drinks per occasion frequently. Very few subjects received a diagnosis of DSM-IV alcohol dependence at follow-up, and those who did were equally likely to come from the abuse and non-abuse baseline groups. A current abuse diagnosis at baseline strongly and significantly predicted an abuse diagnosis at follow-up, although a past-only (remitted) abuse diagnosis at baseline was not clearly predictive of abuse at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The DSM-IV alcohol abuse category has some predictive validity. However, given the manner in which respondents met criteria for the disorder, its merits as a diagnostic category remain in question. Researchers should be cautious about combining alcohol dependence and abuse into the same category.     

Modeling the Dimensionality of DSM-IV Alcohol Use Disorder Criteria in a Nationally Representative Sample of College Students

This study examined the dimensionality of DSM-IV alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria in a nationally representative sample of college students (N = 4,605) using latent variable techniques. We used data from the 2009 National Survey of Drug Use and Health and selected those who were currently enrolled in college and current drinkers. Confirmatory factor analysis provided support for a one-factor solution of the AUD criteria. Item Response Theory analyses indicated that the alcohol abuse and dependence criteria severity parameters were intermixed along the AUD severity continuum with high discrimination parameters. Findings support reformulating the current AUD diagnostic system for the DSM-V. Study's limitations are noted.     

Association of Physical Activity with Alcohol Abuse and Dependence in a Nationally-Representative U.S. Sample

Background: Alcohol use is a pervasive and costly public health problem in the United States. Relapse rates from alcohol use disorders are high. Although exercise has been proposed as a strategy to prevent relapse, lifestyle modification is the least studied aspect of relapse prevention programs, especially among racial/ethnic minority populations. Objective: The current study assessed whether being physically active was associated with remission from alcohol abuse or dependence among Black (African American and Afro Caribbean) adults in the U.S. Method: We utilized data on Black adult participants (n = 4,828) from the nationally representative National Survey of American Life (NSAL) conducted in 2001–2003. Logistic regression models were estimated to assess the odds of being in 12-month remission or currently meeting DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence based on level of physical activity, adjusting for socio-demographic and neighborhood characteristics. Results: People who endorsed being physically active had higher odds of being in 12-month remission from alcohol use problems (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.28, 2.17) than people who were physically inactive, adjusting for individual- and neighborhood-level characteristics. People who were physically active did not differ significantly from those who were inactive with respect to odds of currently meeting DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence. Conclusions/Importance: Physical activity was positively associated with being in 12-month remission from alcohol use problems. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish temporal ordering and to explore exercise as a potential relapse prevention strategy for alcohol use problems.     

The prognostic implications of DSM-IV abuse criteria in drinking adolescents

BACKGROUND: The validity of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for alcohol abuse has been questioned, and additional issues have been raised regarding the performance of this label in adolescents. While future diagnostic manuals might alter the approach to abuse, it is worthwhile to evaluate the implications of the current definition that has been in place since 1994. METHODS: Six hundred and sixteen 12-19-year-old subjects (mean 16.5 years) were offspring identified in the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) protocol who had ever consumed a full drink and who were followed up 5 years later using age-appropriate semi-structured interviews. Following the guidelines for evaluating the utility of the diagnostic labels of Robins and Guze [Robins, E., Guze, S.B., 1970. Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: its application to schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiat. 126, 983-987], the subjects with alcohol abuse were compared with other groups regarding clinical validators and clinical course. RESULTS: At initial interview, the pattern of most alcohol use and problem variables were least severe for teenagers with no diagnosis, intermediate for those with abuse, and the highest for individuals with alcohol dependence. At follow-up, 50% of those with initial abuse maintained that diagnosis, 19% developed dependence, and 31% had no DSM-IV diagnosis. Baseline alcohol abuse predicted follow-up diagnosis even when evaluated along with initial demographic and substance use characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: These results support some assets for the DSM-IV alcohol abuse criteria in these adolescents, including indications of both cross-sectional and predictive validities. Additional studies will need to compare the current abuse label with other possible approaches.