Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Nodal Disease and Nodal Surgery by Tumor Subtype

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is known to downstage disease in the breast and increase breast conservation. It can also decrease nodal disease extent. We evaluated the impact of NAC on nodal positivity, nodal burden, and nodal surgery by tumor subtype.

Methods

All cT1–4c breast cancers from 2010 to 2014 in the National Cancer Database were evaluated, comparing patients receiving NAC with those undergoing primary surgery (PS). Rates of pathologic node-negative status (pN0) and sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery (1–5 nodes) were compared using chi-square tests, and adjusted odds ratios (OR) were estimated.

Results

Of 461,549 patients, 36,715 (8.0%) received NAC and 424,834 (92.0%) had PS. In cN0 patients, pN0 rates were higher in NAC compared with PS patients in ER?/HER2+ [93.2 vs. 79.0%, odds ratio (OR) 3.64, p < 0.001], ER?/HER2? (89.9 vs. 85.2%, OR 1.55, p < 0.001), and ER+/HER2+ (84.7 vs. 78.3%, OR 1.54, p < 0.001). Patients with cT2–3, N0 tumors had significantly higher rate of SLN surgery for NAC versus PS for each biologic subtype except for ER+/HER2? tumors, amongst which this was true only for T3 tumors. In cN1–3 patients, pN0 rates after NAC were 61.3% in ER?/HER2+, 47.7% in ER+/HER2+, 47.3% in ER?/HER2?, and 20.2% in ER+/HER2? and SLN surgery was highest in ER?/HER2+ (28.9%, p < 0.05 versus other subtypes).

Conclusion

NAC increases rates of pN0 among cN0 patients compared with PS. Among cN+ patients, 20–61% undergoing NAC convert to pN0 depending on tumor type, with lowest nodal response in ER+/HER2? disease. Use of NAC results in less extensive axillary surgery than in patients treated with PS in both cN0 and cN+ disease.

     

Multidisciplinary Management of the Axilla in Patients with cT1-T2 N0 Breast Cancer Undergoing Primary Mastectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-Institution Series

Background

The after mapping of the axilla: radiotherapy or surgery (AMAROS) trial concluded that for patients with cT1-2 N0 breast cancer and one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), axillary radiotherapy (AxRT) provides equivalent locoregional control and a lower incidence of lymphedema compared with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The study prospectively assessed how often ALND could be replaced by AxRT in a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing mastectomy for cT1-2 N0 breast cancer.

Methods

In November 2015, our multidisciplinary group agreed to omit routine intraoperative SLN evaluation for cT1-2 N0 patients undergoing upfront mastectomy and potentially eligible for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), including those 60 years of age or younger and those older than 60 years with high-risk features. Patients with one or two positive SLNs on final pathology were reviewed to determine whether PMRT including the full axilla was an appropriate alternative to ALND.

Results

From November 2015 to December 2016, 154 patients met the study criteria, and 114 (74%) formed the final study cohort. Intraoperative SLN evaluation was omitted for 76 patients (67%). Of these patients, 20 (26%) had one or two positive SLNs, and 14 of these patients received PMRT?+?AxRT as an alternative to ALND. Three patients returned for ALND, and three patients were observed. On univariate analysis, tumor size, LVI, number of positive lymph nodes, and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with receipt of PMRT.

Conclusions

For the majority of patients with one or two positive SLNs, ALND was avoided in favor of PMRT?+?AxRT. With appropriate multidisciplinary strategies, intraoperative evaluation of the SLN and immediate ALND can be avoided for patients meeting the AMAROS criteria and eligible for PMRT.

     

Nodal Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Luminal Breast Cancer Vary by Genomic Risk

Background

Although an advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is eradication of axillary disease, nodal pCR rates are much lower for ER+/HER2? breast cancer than other subtypes. We sought to evaluate the association of genomic risk with nodal pCR in ER+/HER2? disease.

Methods

Patients with ER+/HER2? clinically-node-positive (cT0-cT4d/cN1-cN3/cM0) breast cancer treated with NAC and surgery 2010–2018 in the National Cancer Database were identified. Low genomic risk was classified as Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score (RS) 0–25, or Mammaprint 70-gene or RS coded as “Low.” High genomic risk included RS >25, or 70-gene or RS coded as “High.” Nodal pCR was compared between patients with high versus low genomic risk by using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Of 15,698 patients, genomic risk was available for 692 of 15,698 (4.4%). High genomic risk was similar between patients aged <50 years versus 50+ (50.8% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.10). Nodal pCR was higher in high genomic risk (25.0%) than low genomic risk (10.4%, p < 0.001). This difference was observed both for patients aged <50 years (29.9% vs. 9.8%) and aged ≥50 years (22.7% vs. 10.8%). On multivariable analysis adjusted for potential confounding variables, including age, grade, and PR status, genomic risk was independently associated with decreased odds of residual nodal disease (odds ratio 0.49, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

For patients with node-positive ER+/HER2? breast cancer treated with NAC, nodal pCR was highest in patients aged <50 years with high genomic risk tumors. In contrast, nodal pCR rates were low in patients with low genomic risk tumors, regardless of age. This information may help when counseling patients regarding axillary management.

     

Breast Cancer Subtypes as Defined by the Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR), and the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) among Women with Invasive Breast Cancer in California, 1999–2004

Abstract: Breast cancer research examining either molecular profiles or biomarker subtypes has focused on the estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (ER−/PR−/HER2−) and ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtypes. Less is known about the epidemiology or clinical outcome of the other subtypes. This study examines the eight combinations of ER/PR/HER2 in patients with invasive breast cancer. The 5‐year relative survival and the distribution among demographic, socioeconomic, and tumor characteristics of each of the subtypes are examined. Using the California Cancer Registry, 61,309 women with primary invasive breast cancer were classified according to ER/PR/HER2 status. Five‐year relative survival was computed for the eight subtypes. Bivariate analyses were used to assess the distribution of cases across all subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compute the adjusted odds of having one of the five subtypes with the best and worst survival. Survival varied from 96% (ER+/PR+/HER2−) to 76% (ER−/PR−/HER2+ and ER−/PR−/HER2−). The four subtypes with the poorest survival were all ER negative. Women who were younger than age 50, non‐Hispanic black or Hispanic, of the lowest SES groups, and had stage IV tumors that were undifferentiated were overrepresented in ER−/PR−/HER2+ and triple negative (ER−/PR−/HER2−) subtypes. Asian Pacific Islanders had increased odds (OR = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26–1.57) of having the ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtype. Stage III tumors (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.08–1.44) and stage IV tumors (OR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.27–1.98) had higher odds than stage I tumors of being ER−/PR−/HER2+. Stage IV tumors (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.44–0.67) strongly decreased the odds of the ER−/PR−/HER2− subtype. Poorly differentiated and undifferentiated tumors were over 20 times as likely as well‐differentiated tumors of being ER−/PR−/HER2− or ER−/PR−/HER2+. There are considerable differences in survival, demographics, and tumor characteristics among the eight subtypes. We recommend reporting breast cancer as an ER/PR/HER2 subtype and precisely documenting demographic and tumor characteristics.     

The Changing Role of Gene-Expression Profiling in the Era of De-escalating Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Purpose

We assessed the recent trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy thereby evaluating the role of the 70-gene signature (70-GS) testing in decision-making in the systemic treatment of patients with lymph node negative (N0) and lymph node positive (N+) breast cancer.

Methods

Patients with a national guideline directed indication for 70-GS use treated between 2013 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Time trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated within guideline- and age-delineated subgroups. The influence of the 70-GS on chemotherapy use was assessed with logistic regression.

Results

During the study period, the overall administration of adjuvant chemotherapy decreased from 49 to 23% and 70-GS use increased from 24 to 51%. The 70-GS was not associated with a decreased likelihood for N0 patients to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–1.17), as the proportion of N0 patients who received chemotherapy in the absence of 70-GS use decreased during the study period. In patients with N1a disease, 70-GS testing was associated with a decreased likelihood to receive chemotherapy (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.15–0.29). In patients < 50 years and 50–59 years of age, 70-GS use was associated with a consistent lower proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy throughout the study period (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.13–0.23 and OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.43–0.65, respectively).

Conclusions

In this population-based study, the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ breast cancer strongly declined. For node-positive and younger patients, 70-GS use was associated with a decreased probability for patients to receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

     

How Often Do Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Results Affect Adjuvant Therapy Decisions Among Postmenopausal Women with Early-Stage HR+/HER2− Breast Cancer in the Post-RxPONDER Era?

Background

The RxPONDER trial reported no benefit to chemotherapy among postmenopausal patients with HR⁺/HER2^? tumors, one to three positive nodes, and low recurrence scores, questioning the role of axillary staging in this population. Here, we evaluate the impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) results on adjuvant therapy decisions in postmenopausal women with HR⁺/HER2^? breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

Postmenopausal women with cT1–2N0, HR⁺/HER2^? breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and SLNB from 2012 to 2018 were identified. Receipt of nodal irradiation, indication for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and chemotherapy, and partial breast irradiation (PBI) eligibility were reviewed with pre- and post-SLNB results.

Results

A total of 1786 women were identified: median age 62 years, 84% with pT1 tumors, and 16% with pT2–3 tumors. Of those, 85% (n = 1525) remained pN0, 14% (n = 244) were pN1, and 1% (n = 17) were pN2–3. A total of 20 (1%) patients had > 2 positive SLNs, necessitating ALND. Pre-SLNB, 1478 women were considered PBI eligible; post-SLNB, 227 (13%) converted to PBI ineligible. In total, 58 patients with positive nodes received nodal irradiation, representing 3% of the entire cohort and 22% of pN+ patients. Overall, 1401 patients had an Oncotype DX recurrence score available, including 1273 patients with pN0 stage and 128 with pN1, with 173 (14%) and 16 (13%), respectively, having a recurrence score > 25, warranting chemotherapy.

Conclusions

While few cN0 postmenopausal women with HR⁺/HER2^? tumors had nodal pathology that warranted ALND, receipt of nodal irradiation, or indicated need for chemotherapy, in 13%, SLNB would have an impact on consideration for PBI. Among patients eligible for PBI, findings from SLNB may help refine selection among postmenopausal women with this tumor profile.

     

Decreasing Use of Axillary Dissection in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may downstage axillary disease in node-positive breast cancer. Several clinical trials have shown that sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery after NAC is feasible for these patients. We sought to evaluate the use of SLN surgery and ALND in cN1 patients undergoing NAC.

Methods

We identified all patients with biopsy-proven cN1 breast cancer treated with NAC at our institution between January 2009 and December 2017. Approximated biologic subtype was determined by estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. Cochran–Armitage trend and Chi square tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Of 430 cN1 patients treated with NAC, 93 (22%) underwent SLN surgery only, 100 (23%) underwent SLN and ALND, and 237 (55%) underwent ALND only. The use of SLN surgery (±?ALND) increased from 28% in 2009 to 86% in 2017 (p?<?0.001), while the performance of ALND decreased from 100% in 2009 to 38% in 2017 (p?<?0.001). Among SLN+ patients who underwent ALND, disease was limited to the SLNs in 25/73 (34%) patients. The nodal pathologic complete response rate was 46% and varied by tumor subtype (p?<?0.001). Among patients undergoing SLN surgery, ALND was avoided in 48% of patients overall and varied by biologic subtype: 55% ER?/HER2+, 61% ER+/HER2+, 62% ER?/HER2?, and 31% ER+/HER2? (p?=?0.001). With short-term follow-up, no nodal recurrences have occurred in patients without ALND.

Conclusions

We observed a significant shift in axillary surgery for cN1 breast cancer patients treated with NAC, with increasing use of SLN surgery to assess nodal treatment response, and decreasing use of ALND.

     

Postmastectomy radiation therapy and survival outcome in older patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer

BackgroundThe prognostic impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) on contemporary older patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer is unclear. We aimed to investigate the effect of PMRT in this setting.MethodsLeveraging the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data from 2004 to 2015, 7052 patients aged 70 years or older with T1-2N1 breast cancer were identified for this propensity-matched analysis. Fine and Gray competing risks regression was conducted to explore the correlation between PMRT and breast cancer-specific survival, in subgroups defined by tumor size and positive lymph nodes.ResultsThe median follow-up was 60.1 months (interquartile range, 28.0 to 87.0). Among propensity-matched patients, multivariate analysis identified an association between PMRT and decreased breast cancer mortality (BCM; HR 0.637; 95 % CI 0.436–0.931; P = 0.020) in patient subset with three positive nodes and tumors 2–5 cm in size, and this benefit was limited to patients with three positive nodes and tumors 2–5 cm in size who did not receive chemotherapy. In patient subsets who received chemotherapy, no association between PMRT and BCM was found.ConclusionPMRT was not associated with BCM in older patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer who received chemotherapy. The benefit of PMRT was limited to those with three positive nodes and tumors 2–5 cm in size who did not receive chemotherapy.     

Risk factors for brain metastasis as a first site of disease recurrence in patients with HER2 positive early stage breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab

PurposeThe aim of this study was to determine risk factors for brain metastasis as the first site of disease recurrence in patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC) who received adjuvant trastuzumab.MethodsMedical records of 588 female patients who received 52-week adjuvant trastuzumab from 14 centers were evaluated. Cumulative incidence functions for brain metastasis as the first site of disease recurrence and the effect of covariates on brain metastasis were evaluated in a competing risk analysis and competing risks regression, respectively.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 36 months. Cumulative incidence of brain metastasis at 12 months and 24 months was 0.6% and 2%, respectively. HER2-enriched subtype (ER− and PR−) tumor (p = 0.001, RR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.33–8.71) and stage 3 disease (p = 0.0032, RR: 9.39, 95% CI: 1.33–8.71) were significant risk factors for development of brain metastasis as the first site of recurrence.ConclusionsIn patients with HER2 positive EBC who received adjuvant trastuzumab, HER2-enriched subtype (ER− and PR−) tumor and stage 3 disease were associated with increased risk of brain metastasis as the first site of disease recurrence.     

The effect of postmastectomy radiation therapy on high-risk patients with T1-2N0 breast cancer

BackgroundThe prognostic impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) on high-risk patients with T1-2N0 breast cancer is controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect of PMRT on high-risk patients with T1-2N0 breast cancer.MethodsA total of 3439 patients diagnosed with T1-2N0 breast cancer who received mastectomy between 2000 and 2016 in our institute were retrospectively analyzed. Leveraging the Fine and Gray competing risks regression in unirradiated patients, risk factors of locoregional recurrence (LRR) were identified. All patients were stratified into high-risk (3 or 4 risk factors) and low-risk (no more than 2 risk factors) groups. The prognostic effect of PMRT was estimated in two subgroups. This subgroup analysis was also performed in patients with T2N0 breast cancer.ResultsThe median follow-up was 89 months. The 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 2.2% in unirradiated patients. Tumor size, estrogen receptor (ER) status, histologic grade and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were identified as independent risk factors of LRR. In the high-risk group, PMRT was correlated with a 8.3% risk reduction of 5-year LRR, 7.8% risk reduction of 5-year distant recurrence (DR), and 6.4% risk reduction of 5-year breast cancer mortality (BCM), whereas it was not correlated with LRR, DR, or BCM in low-risk group. In patients with T2N0 breast cancer, PMRT was associated with decreased LRR, DR and BCM in high-risk group, other than low-risk group.ConclusionsPMRT presented heterogenous effect on patients with T1-2N0 breast cancer. Patients at high risk of LRR were more likely to benefit from PMRT.     

Prognostic impact of HER2-low expression in hormone receptor positive early breast cancer

BackgroundRecent data suggest that human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer may represent a distinct entity. We aimed to compare disease characteristics and outcomes between HER2-low and HER2-0 in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, early-stage breast cancer.MethodsA single center retrospective study comprising all women with ER positive, HER2 negative early breast cancer, for whom an Oncotype DX test was performed between 2005 and 2012. Women were grouped to HER2-low (immunohistochemistry +1 or +2 and in situ hybridization not amplified) or HER2-0. Clinico-pathological features and Oncotype recurrence score (RS) were collected. Data on overall-survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) were evaluated according to HER2 expression status.Results608 women were included, of which 304 women had HER2-0 and 304 had HER2-low disease. Lobular subtype was significantly more common in HER-0 compared to HER2-low disease (17% vs. 8%, p = 0.005). The prevalence of other clinic-pathological characteristics and long-term prognosis were comparable between both groups. For women with high genomic risk (RS > 25), HER2-low expression was associated with significantly favorable OS (HR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.11–0.78, p = 0.01), DFS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.20–0.82, p = 0.01) and DDFS (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.63, P = 0.002) compared to women with HER2-0. For women with low genomic risk (RS ≤ 25), long-term prognosis was unrelated to HER2 expression.ConclusionThe prognostic impact of HER2-low expression in early-stage luminal disease varies across the genomic risk, with significant favorable outcomes of HER2-low expression compared to HER2-0 in women with high genomic risk.     

Identifying pathologic complete response of the breast after neoadjuvant systemic therapy with ultrasound guided biopsy to eventually omit surgery: Study design and feasibility of the MICRA trial (Minimally Invasive Complete Response Assessment)

PurposeImprovements in neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for breast cancer patients have led to increasing rates of pathologic complete response (pCR). The MICRA trial (NTR6120) aims at identifying pCR with post-NST biopsies. Here, we report the study design and feasibility.MethodsThe MICRA-trial is a multi-center prospective cohort study. Patients with a pre-NST placed marker and radiologic complete (rCR) or partial response on MRI after NST are eligible for inclusion. Ultrasound guided biopsy of the original tumor area is performed. Pathology results of the biopsies and surgery specimens are compared. The primary endpoint is false-negative rate of biopsies in identifying pCR.ResultsDuring the first year of the trial 58 patients with rCR were included. One patient was a screening failure and excluded for analysis. Twenty-one percent had hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- tumors, 21% HR+/HER2+ tumors, 18% HR-/HER2+ tumors and 40% TN tumors. Overall pCR was 68%. In seven patients biopsies could not be obtained: in 6 patients, the marker could not be identified on ultrasound in the OR and in 1 patient there were technical difficulties. A median of eight biopsies was obtained (range 4–9). The median of histopathological representative biopsies was 4 (range 1–8).ConclusionUltrasound guided biopsy of the breast in patients with excellent response on MRI after NST is feasible. Accuracy results of the MICRA trial will be presented after inclusion of 525 patients to determine if ultrasound guided biopsy is an accurate alternative to surgical resection for assessment of pCR after NST.     

Relevance of the 21-gene expression assay in male breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionThe 21-gene assay provides prognostication for estrogen receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (ER+/HER2-) early female breast cancer patients. This signature has not been validated in male breast cancer (MBC).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. Retrospective cohort studies comparing 21-gene assay scores in female and MBC were included. Dichotomous variables were pooled as odds ratios (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the Mantel–Haenszel method.ResultsSix studies including 176,338 patients were included (mean age of 63.4 years, range: 33–88). Of these, 1.0% had MBC (1826/176,338) and 99.0% were female patients (174,512/176,338). MBC patients were more likely to have increased tumour stage, nodal involvement, and grade 3 disease (all P < 0.001) In MBC patients, the mean score was 18.8 (range: 11–26) vs. 13.4 (range 0–33) in female patients (P < 0.001). In MBC patients, 22.4% had scores >30 (408/1822) versus 18.3% in female patients (31,852/174,500). In female patients, 52.0% had scores <18 (90,787/174,500) versus 47.8% in MBC (471/1822). Overall, patients with female patients were as likely to have scores <18 (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.94–1.16), scores 18–30 (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.00–1.26) and scores >30 (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.45–1.07) as MBC patients.ConclusionThere are similar anticipated scores for female and MBC undergoing 21-gene expression assay testing for early stage, ER+/HER2-breast cancer. In the absence of stage matching, cautious interpretation of these results is required. Validation of the 21-gene assay in MBC is still required.     

Predictive value of renal tumor contour irregularity score in pathological T3a upstaging of clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional study

PurposeTo explore the predictive value of renal tumor contour irregular degree (CID) in pathological T3a upstaging of clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective multi-institutional review of 1,487 patients with clinical T1N0M0 RCC between January 2009 and June 2019. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regressions were used to analyze the prognostic factors of disease-free survival (DFS). Logistic regressions were performed to determine predictors of pathological T3a upstaging in clinical T1 RCC.ResultsAmong 1,487 patients with cT1 RCC, 96 (6.5%) were pathological T3a upstaging. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.022, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.001–1.042, P = 0.036), tumor maximum diameter(OR = 1.242, 95% CI = 1.042-–1.480, P = 0.015) and CID (OR = 1.067, 95% CI = 1.051–1.083, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of pathological T3a upstaging. The area under the curve (AUC) of the prediction model that included the CID was 0.846, while the AUC of the prediction model that did not include CID was only 0.741, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that patients with pathological T3a upstaging had significantly worse DFS than patients without pathological T3a upstaging (P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox analysis showed that pathological T3a upstaging (HR = 1.836, 95% CI = 1.013–3.329, P = 0.002) is an independent prognostic factor for DFS in patients with cT1N0M0 RCC.ConclusionsThe predictive model of CID combined with tumor maximum diameter and age significantly improved the ability to predict pathological T3a upstaging in clinical T1 RCC, compared with the prediction model of tumor maximum diameter combined with age. The predictive model of CID combined with tumor maximum diameter and age may be applicable to patients considering partial vs. radical nephrectomy.     

Delaying surgery for clinical T1b-T2bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: Oncologic implications in the COVID-19 era and beyond

PurposeDuring COVID-19, many operating rooms were reserved exclusively for emergent cases. As a result, many elective surgeries for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were deferred, with an unknown impact on outcomes. Since surveillance is commonplace for small renal masses, we focused on larger, organ-confined RCCs. Our primary endpoint was pT3a upstaging and our secondary endpoint was overall survival.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively abstracted cT1b-T2bN0M0 RCC patients from the National Cancer Database, stratifying them by clinical stage and time from diagnosis to surgery. We selected only those patients who underwent surgery. Patients were grouped by having surgery within 1 month, 1–3 months, or >3 months after diagnosis. Logistic regression models measured pT3a upstaging risk. Kaplan Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models assessed overall survival.ResultsA total of 29,746 patients underwent partial or radical nephrectomy. Delaying surgery >3 months after diagnosis did not confer pT3a upstaging risk among cT1b (OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.77–1.05, P = 0.170), cT2a (OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.69–1.19, P = 0.454), or cT2b (OR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.62–1.51, P = 0.873). In all clinical stage strata, nonclear cell RCCs were significantly less likely to be upstaged (P <0.001). A sensitivity analysis, performed for delays of <1, 1–3, 3–6, and >6 months, also showed no increase in upstaging risk.ConclusionDelaying surgery up to, and even beyond, 3 months does not significantly increase risk of tumor progression in clinically localized RCC. However, if deciding to delay surgery due to COVID-19, tumor histology, growth kinetics, patient comorbidities, and hospital capacity/resources, should be considered.     

A comparison of overall survival and perioperative outcomes between partial and radical nephrectomy for cT1b and cT2 renal cell carcinoma—Analysis of a national cancer registry

Objectives

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the standard management of cT1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and there is a basis for expanding its indications to larger tumors (cT1b and cT2). We analyzed a large population-based cancer registry to compare the overall survival (OS) and perioperative outcomes in patients with cT1b and cT2 RCC undergoing PN with those undergoing radical nephrectomy (RN).

Treatment Strategies in Octogenarians with Early-Stage,High-Risk Breast Cancer

Background

Octogenarians with early-stage breast cancer often have low-risk tumor biology. However, optimal treatment strategies for those with high-risk biology remain unclear.

Methods

We reviewed the records of women ages 80–89 years with biopsy-proven, Stage I–II invasive breast cancer who were referred for surgical evaluation from January 2001 through December 2010. High-risk was defined as human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive (HER2+), triple-negative (TN), or histologic grade 3 disease.

Results

Among 178 patients, 40 (22%) were high-risk: 12 were grade 1–2 (10 HER2 + , 2 TN); 28 were grade 3 (7 HER2+, 6 TN, 15 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2?). The high-risk group had larger tumors and more often had ductal histology and lymphovascular invasion than the low-risk group and was more likely to undergo mastectomy (18 vs. 5%, p = 0.02), radiotherapy (55 vs. 36%, p = 0.03), and chemotherapy (10 vs. 0%, p = 0.002). Endocrine therapy use was similar among ER+ patients in both groups. The four patients in the high-risk group given chemotherapy were HER2+ and received trastuzumab-based regimens, without any reported toxicities. At median follow-up of 67 months, 10% of the high-risk group had a recurrence (3 distant-only, 1 simultaneous locoregional and distant in a patient treated with mastectomy without radiotherapy).

Conclusions

Tailored locoregional and systemic therapy resulted in low incidence of failure in these octogenarians with high-risk cancers with low morbidity. Modern adjuvant therapies should be considered for elderly women with high-risk cancers in the absence of significant comorbidities.

     

The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Margin Re-excision in Breast-Conserving Surgery

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can improve cosmesis by reducing resection volume. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) aims to achieve clear excision margins while optimizing cosmesis. However, the influence of NAC on margin re-excision after BCS is unclear. This study examines the rate and determinants of margin re-excision in patients undergoing BCS following NAC in our institution.

Methods

From 2011–2015, all patients treated with NAC prior to BCS were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Mann–Whitney and Fisher’s exact test tests were used to compare variables in patients who did and did not require re-excision. Patients undergoing primary surgical treatment in 2015 comprised an unmatched comparison group.

Results

Of 211 patients treated with NAC, 69 initially underwent BCS. The re-excision rate was 32% (n = 22) compared to 17% in the primary operable group (38 of 221, p = 0.02). Re-excision rates were lowest in triple-negative and HER2+ tumors (0% and 10%, respectively). Lobular carcinoma and ER+ tumors had a significantly higher rate of re-excision (100% and 42%, respectively). Of 22 patients undergoing re-excision, 9 had further BCS and 13 had a mastectomy.

Conclusion

The re-excision rate following NAC is almost twice that of patients who underwent primary operative management. Her2+ and triple-negative tumors have lower re-excision rates and may represent a selected cohort most suitable for BCS. Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma or ER+ disease have significantly higher rates of margin positivity, and these patients should be considered for a cavity shave during primary surgery to reduce the rates of re-excision.

     

Radiation therapy utilization and outcomes for older women with breast cancer: Impact of molecular subtype and tumor grade

BackgroundRadiation therapy (RT) utilization for elderly women with respect to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor status has not been evaluated. Our purpose was to determine differences in RT utilization and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) for elderly breast cancer patients with distinct molecular biomarkers.MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for women ≥70 years of age diagnosed with T1N0M0 breast cancer between 2010 and 2013 receiving breast conservation. Chi-squared analysis was performed to determine the difference in RT utilization between groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors for RT use. Kaplan-Meier curves were created and the log-rank test done to compare differences in breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) between groups.ResultsA total of 12,312 patients met the inclusion criteria. Receipt of RT for patients with distinct tumor biomarkers was as follows: 55.7% for patients with Estrogen Receptor (ER) +/HER2+; 57.1% for patients with ER+/HER2-; 65.6% for patients with ER-/HER2+; and 69.2% for ER-/HER2- patients (p < 0.001). Factors associated with RT use included ER-/HER2- status, 70–74 years of age, and high grade disease, while adjuvant RT was associated with improve BCSS in ER+/HER2- and ER-/HER2- patients.ConclusionsPatients 70–74 years old and those with ER-/HER2- are more likely to receive adjuvant RT. Moreover, adjuvant RT is associated with improvements in BCSS in ER+/HER2- and ER-/HER2- patients. Given possible poor compliance with hormonal therapy, the omission of RT in ER + patients, without consideration of HER2 status, should be undertaken with care.