Bilateral effects of unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation: A case report

A recent study has proved that unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus has bilateral effects. However, it is still unclear whether unilateral ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (Vim) DBS exerts exclusively contralateral or bilateral effects on tremor. Previous studies demonstrated a clinically irrelevant improvement on the nontarget side after thalamic stimulator implantation, which was considered to be solely the result of mechanical effects. We report here the case of a 55‐year‐old woman in whom unilateral thalamic DBS can stop the disabling postural‐kinetic tremor in both hands. Simultaneous surface electromyography (sEMG), accelerometry, and video recordings were obtained to evaluate the underlying mechanism. After the right Vim DBS was turned off, moderate rest tremor appeared in both hands accompanied by bilateral bursts on sEMG. Because right hand tremor cannot simply reflect the mechanical overflow of the left side, the bilateral improvement caused by right Vim DBS is probably due to an active tremor reduction in this particular case. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society     

Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus in the treatment of essential tremor

Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder. In most patients the course of ET is mild and pharmacological therapy controls postural and kinetic components of tremor. The first-line treatment of ET is pharmacotherapy with propranolol, primidone and gabapentin. In patients with marked head and voice tremor, local botulinum toxin injections have been found to be very effective. Despite optimal drug therapies it is estimated that approximately 50% of patients with ET have medication-resistant tremor. ET can cause more functional impairment than parkinsonian resting tremor because most prominent components of ET are postural and kinetic ones. For patients with drug-resistant debilitating tremor, surgical therapy (thalamotomy) and more recently deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) is a viable treatment modality. Several long-term studies have confirmed the high effectiveness rate of ablative surgery and thalamic DBS in the treatment of ET. The most striking advantage of thalamic DBS is the possibility of performing bilateral surgery in one operative session with a significantly lower rate of side effects. Nowadays the bilateral staged thalamotomy is performed rarely because of unacceptable side effects. Moreover, many authors have observed that in bilaterally stimulated patients the head and voice tremor have diminished in postoperative course. Thalamic DBS is a very efficacious and safe procedure in the treatment of ET.     

Lesion of thalamic centromedian--parafascicular complex after chronic deep brain stimulation

A patient with PD who exhibited disabling tremor and prominent dyskinesia underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the left thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus. The electrode migrated and was replaced but with suboptimal clinical response. Two years later, postmortem analysis found the second electrode tip had entered the thalamic centromedian-parafascicular complex. There was a small thalamotomy and cell loss exceeding that found in PD. Thalamic damage may occur in association with DBS for PD.     

Comparison of thalamotomy to deep brain stimulation of the thalamus in essential tremor.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome in Essential Tremor (ET) patients who have undergone either thalamotomy or Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus. BACKGROUND: Although both thalamotomy and thalamic DBS are effective surgical treatments of tremor, it is not known if one procedure is superior to the other. DESIGN/METHODS: Thirty-five ET patients underwent thalamotomy between 1994-1998. Data on 18 patients were excluded. The remaining 17 patients were matched for age, sex, side of surgery, and tremor severity to 17 ET patients who underwent thalamic DBS. There were nine men and eight women in each group. The mean age of the thalamotomy group was 74.4 years and that of the thalamic DBS group was 73.1 years. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between any efficacy outcome variables comparing thalamotomy to DBS of the thalamus at baseline or follow-up visits. The surgical complications were higher for the thalamotomy group as compared to the DBS group. However, a larger number of DBS patients underwent repeat surgeries due to problems with the device and the leads. CONCLUSION: Although the efficacy is similar for thalamotomy and DBS of the thalamus for ET, thalamotomy is associated with a higher complication rate. DBS of the thalamus should be the procedure of choice for the surgical treatment of ET in most cases.     

Thalamotomy versus thalamic stimulation for multiple sclerosis tremor.

Disabling intractable tremor occurs frequently in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). There is currently no effective medical treatment available, and the results of surgical intervention have been variable. Thalamotomy has been the mainstay of neurosurgical therapy for intractable MS tremor, however the popularisation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) has led to the adoption of chronic thalamic stimulation in an attempt to ameliorate this condition. With the goal of examining the relative efficacy and adverse effects of these two surgical strategies, we studied twenty carefully selected patients with intractable MS tremor. Thalamotomy was performed in 10 patients, with chronic DBS administered to the remaining 10. Both thalamotomy and thalamic stimulation produced improvements in postural and intention tremor. The mean improvement in postural tremor at 16.2 months following surgery was 78%, compared with a 64% improvement after thalamic stimulation (14.6 month follow-up) (P > 0.05). Intention tremor improved by 72% in the group undergoing thalamotomy, a significantly larger gain than the 36% tremor reduction following DBS (P < 0.05). Early postoperative complications were common in both groups. Permanent complications related to surgery occurred in four patients overall. Following thalamotomy, long-term adverse effects were observed in three patients (30%), and comprised hemiparesis and seizures. Only one patient in the thalamic stimulation group experienced a permanent deficit (monoparesis). We conclude that thalamotomy is a more efficacious surgical treatment for intractable MS tremor, however the higher incidence of persistent neurological deficits in patients receiving lesional surgery may support the use of DBS as the preferred surgical strategy.     

Surgical therapy for multiple sclerosis tremor: a 12‐year follow‐up study

Background and purpose: Severe multiple sclerosis (MS) tremor causes disability poorly responsive to medication. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) or thalamotomy can suppress tremor, but long‐term outcomes are unclear. Methods: Nine patients with MS tremor underwent disability measures at baseline and 12 months post‐surgery (six thalamotomy, three DBS) in 1997–1998 (previously reported, Matsumoto et al., Neurology 2001;57:1876–82). We report the prospective 12‐year follow‐up of this cohort for tremor, disability, and death. Results: Surgery was initially successful in all. Tremor recurred in all patients within median 3 months, although two DBS patients were tremor‐free for 5 years. Median tremor‐free survival (tremor‐free time/survival time) was 4.3%. At 12‐year follow‐up, four survivors (two thalamotomy, two DBS) (Expanded Disability Status Scale scores 8–8.5) were severely disabled. Five patients were dead (four thalamotomy, one DBS) median 5.8 years post‐operative. Conclusions: Surgery benefit for severe tremor was overall short‐lived (median 3 months), with long‐term poor prognosis. Although two DBS patients had sustained 5‐year tremor‐suppression, the observed progressive disability and death in this cohort bear importance for long‐term success in future MS tremor surgery trials.     

Management of a DBS System in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Case Report

Introduction: The use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is growing. While these patients may suffer from traumatic brain injuries, treatment guidelines for these patients have not yet been reported. This case report demonstrates a strategy for traumatic brain injury after DBS implantation. Clinical presentation: A 46‐year‐old man underwent bilateral DBS in the posterior subthalamic area for essential tremor, which improved both distal and proximal tremor. Two years later, he underwent emergent hematoma evacuation due to a motor vehicle associated injury. A 23‐year‐old male patient presented with severe Tourette's syndrome characterized by a vocal and self lip biting motor tic. There was a good effect of chronic bilateral thalamic DBS at CM‐Pf. Five months later, he had acute subdural hematoma after a motorcycle accident. Instead of removing stimulation electrodes immediately after traumatic brain injury, the patient was reassessed after recovery. Merged preoperative magnetic resonance images and brain computed tomography images, and clinical reassessments were used to plan future treatment. Conclusion: We recommend removing only the hematoma, leaving the electrodes in position, and then reassessing the electrode position using merged images. The clinical correlation with electrode migration also should be checked. If the patient can tolerate stimulation with a minor displacement, the electrodes should be left in position and the stimulation parameter needs to be adjusted. If not, the stimulation electrodes should be deactivated or repositioned appropriately, depending on the patient's conditions.     

Long‐term deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: 12‐year clinicopathologic follow‐up

We describe the clinical course and postmortem pathological findings in a patient with essential tremor (ET) treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) for 12 years. This 75 year old woman had a 13‐year history of progressive ET prior to implantation of bilateral quadripolar DBS electrodes in the region of her ventral intermediate thalamic nuclei in 1996, producing immediate relief of arm tremor. Histopathological examination of the brain, performed 12 years after the initial implantation, demonstrated electrode catheter tracts rimmed by 20‐25 micron fibrous sheaths, with multinucleated giant cells and reactive gliosis. Lymphocytic infiltration was seen by L26 immunoreactivity with CD3 (T cells) staining predominating over CD20 (B cells). Cerebellar axonal spheroids and Purkinje cell loss were found. The minimal foreign body reaction and gliosis around the electrodes 12 years after implantation supports the long‐term safety of DBS. The case represents the longest reported follow‐up with autopsy examination after DBS and confirmed histological changes associated with ET. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

Difference in surgical strategies between thalamotomy and thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor control

Journal of Neurology - Stereotactic targeting strategies differ between thalamotomy and thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for tremor control. In thalamotomy, a minimal radiofrequency lesion...     

Comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of unilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) with bilateral STN DBS in advanced PD. METHODS: Our initial 10 consecutive patients with medication-refractory motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesias undergoing chronic bilateral STN DBS underwent a standardized evaluation of unilateral and bilateral STN DBS in the medication-off state 6 to 18 months after electrode implantation. RESULTS: Bilateral STN DBS improved the mean total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score by 54%, whereas unilateral stimulation improved motor scores only 23%. Unilateral STN DBS improved postural stability and gait 14%, other axial motor features 19%, and overall parkinsonism in limbs contralateral to stimulation by 46%, including an 86% improvement in contralateral tremor. However, bilateral STN DBS resulted in greater improvement in each of these domains, including limb function, i.e., the reduction in scores from the limbs on one side was greater with bilateral than with unilateral stimulation of the contralateral STN. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral STN DBS improves parkinsonism considerably more than unilateral STN DBS; bilateral simultaneous electrode implantation may be the most appropriate surgical option for patients with significant bilateral disability. Unilateral STN DBS results in moderate improvement in all aspects of off-period parkinsonism and improves tremor as much as is typically reported with DBS of the ventral intermedius nucleus of the thalamus (Vim). For this reason, STN DBS may be a more appropriate choice than Vim DBS or thalamotomy for parkinsonian tremor. Some patients with highly asymmetric tremor-dominant PD might be appropriately treated with unilateral instead of bilateral STN DBS.     

Difference in surgical strategies between thalamotomy and thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor control

Stereotactic targeting strategies differ between thalamotomy and thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) for tremor control. In thalamotomy, a minimal radiofrequency lesion created within the lateral portion of the nucleus ventralis intermedius (Vim) often affords the best control of parkinsonian tremor, supporting the assumption that there is a concentrated cluster of cells within this area which is responsible for tremor. However, this assumption may not always be true; such neural elements sometimes appear to spread out across wide areas. Cells with tremor-frequency activity are widely distributed over the areas extending from the Vim to the nuclei ventralis oralis posterior and anterior (Vop and Voa). All of these cells appear to be more or less involved in tremor generation, especially in patients with essential tremor and post-stroke tremor. In contrast to radiofrequency lesions for thalamotomy, electrodes for DBS can be arranged in such a way that wide areas can be stimulated, if necessary. For this purpose, it is critically important to determine optimal placement and orientation of DBS leads for arranging the electrodes to yield maximal benefits in patients with tremor.     

Is the target for thalamic deep brain stimulation the same as for thalamotomy?

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has virtually replaced thalamotomy for the treatment of essential tremor. It is thought that the site for DBS is the same as the optimal lesion site; however, this match has not been investigated previously. We sought to determine whether the location of thalamic DBS matched the site at which thalamotomy would be performed. Eleven patients who had detailed microelectrode recording and stimulation for placement of DBS electrodes and subsequent successful tremor control were analysed. An experienced surgeon, blinded to outcome and final electrode position, selected the ideal thalamotomy site based on the reconstructed maps obtained intraoperatively. When the site of long-term clinically used DBS and theoretical thalamotomy location was calculated in three-dimensional space and compared for each of the x, y, and z axes in stereotactic space, there was no significant difference in the mediolateral location of DBS and theoretical lesion site. There was also no difference between the theoretical lesion site and the placement of the tip of the electrode; however, the active electrodes used for chronic stimulation were significantly more anterior (P = 0.005) and dorsal (P = 0.034) to the ideal thalamotomy target. This mismatch may reflect the compromise required between adverse and beneficial effects with chronic stimulation, but it also suggests different mechanisms of effect of DBS and thalamotomy.     

Deep brain stimulation of the Vim nucleus of the thalamus in the treatment of parkinsonian tremor

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (Vim) has been recently introduced by Benabid and his colleagues as a new surgical procedure in the treatment of tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (PD). The advantage of DBS Vim over lesioning (thalamotomy) is its reversibility and adjustability with the same clinical effect, but without the need to make a destructive thalamic lesion. In this procedure high-frequency stimulation is employed to simulate a thalamic lesion using an implanted electrode connected to a subcutaneously placed neuropacemaker. Four patients with tremor-dominant PD were included in the study. There were 3 men and one women. Three stimulators were implanted in the left and one in the right cerebral hemisphere. The patients were evaluated using clinical scales, before and up to 24 months after surgery. Adverse effects associated with chronic Vim stimulation were mild and reversible. Chronic thalamic stimulation is effective for drug-resistance parkinsonian tremor suppression, with few adverse side-effects. The method results in a significant improvement of function.     

Neuropsychological and quality of life outcome after thalamic stimulation for essential tremor

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short-term effects of unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) on cognition, mood state, and quality of life in patients with essential tremor (ET). BACKGROUND: Unilateral thalamotomy and thalamic DBS are effective in alleviating refractory tremor contralateral to the side of surgery. Thalamotomy can lead to cognitive morbidity, and DBS might be a preferable surgical intervention given potential avoidance or reversibility of such morbidity. Although unilateral thalamic DBS is cognitively safe and leads to quality of life improvement in PD, its neurobehavioral effects in ET are unknown. METHODS: Forty patients with ET were administered a broad neuropsychological test battery, measures of mood state, and generic and disease-specific quality of life measures approximately 1 month before and 3 months after surgery (left hemisphere, 38 patients). RESULTS: Unilateral thalamic DBS was associated with significant improvements in tremor and dominant-hand fine visuomotor coordination. Statistically significant but clinically modest gains were observed on tasks of visuoperceptual and constructional ability, visual attention, delayed word list recognition, and prose recall. Only lexical verbal fluency declined significantly after surgery. Patients rated themselves as less anxious after surgery, and they perceived their quality of life as improved significantly. In particular, patients reported improved quality of life with respect to activities of daily living, stigma, emotional well-being, and communication. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral thalamic DBS for ET is cognitively safe and associated with improvements in anxiety and quality of life in the near term and in the absence of operative complications. Patients were better able to carry out activities of daily living after surgery, and they reported improvement in several psychosocial domains of quality of life.     

Thalamic deep brain stimulation: comparison between unilateral and bilateral placement

BACKGROUND: Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is accepted as an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET) and the tremor of Parkinson disease (PD). There are, however, relatively little data concerning bilateral thalamic DBS and no thorough comparisons between the 2 methods. METHODS: To assess the relative benefit of a staged second contralateral DBS placement in patients with PD and ET, we compared preoperative baseline assessments with those at 3 months after the initial implantation, and again at 3 months after the second contralateral implantation. The assessments included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale for patients with PD (n = 8) and a modified Unified Tremor Rating Assessment for patients with ET (n = 13). The design included open and blinded (unknown activation status) assessments. RESULTS: Overall, after the second implantation, all specific measures assessing tremor contralateral to that side improved in patients with PD and ET, generally without sacrificing those contralateral to the first side implantation. Midline tremors (face and head) improved only after the second side implantation. In patients with ET, functional and subjective scores tended to further improve after the second placement; however, patients with PD had less subjective improvement. Hand tremor scores in patients with ET randomized to "on" stimulation improved from 6.7 +/- 0.9 to 1.3 +/- 1.2 (P<.005). The scores of patients with PD randomized to on stimulation improved from 9.3 +/- 1.0 to 1.0 +/- 0.5. (Data are given as mean +/- SD.) Tremor scores did not change from baseline in those patients randomized to "off" stimulation in either group. Adverse events related to stimulation increased after the second implantation in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral thalamic DBS is more effective than unilateral DBS at controlling bilateral appendicular and midline tremors of ET and PD. Despite this, overall functional disability only improved in patients with ET, possibly secondary to more problematic adverse events in patients with PD, especially balance problems. Bilateral DBS should be considered when unilateral DBS does not offer satisfactory benefit, especially in patients with ET.     

Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in medically refractory orthostatic tremor: Preliminary observations

Orthostatic tremor (OT) is a disabling movement disorder associated with postural and gait impairment in the elderly. Medical therapy often yields insufficient benefit. We report the clinical and electrophysiological data on two patients with medication‐refractory OT treated with deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus (Vim DBS). Patient 1 underwent bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) and Patient 2 unilateral Vim DBS following 28 and 30 years of disease duration, respectively. Both patients showed increased latency to symptom onset after rising from a seated position, improved tolerance for prolonged standing, and slower crescendo of tremor severity when remaining upright. Postoperative evaluation demonstrated decreased amplitude of electromyographic activity with persistence of well‐defined oscillatory behavior showing strong coherence at 15 Hz between all muscles tested in the upper and lower limbs. Postural sway was unchanged. Clinical benefits have been sustained for over 18 months in Patient 1, and receded after 3 months in Patient 2. These findings support the consideration of bilateral Vim DBS implantation as a therapeutic option in patients with medically refractory OT. Further efficacy studies on chronic stimulation to disrupt the abnormal oscillatory activity in this disorder are warranted. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society     

Neuropsychological evaluation before and after thalamic stimulation in 9 patients with Parkinson disease]

Chronic thalamic-VIM stimulation was performed in 9 parkinsonian patients with disabling tremor and poor response to drugs. Neuropsychological assessment was performed before and after deep brain electrode implantation and stimulation. Mild cognitive disorders were observed prior to thalamic implantation. Neuropsychological testing failed to show intellectual function worsening after implantation and stimulation. We conclude that thalamic stimulation could be an appropriate treatment of untractable tremor as this could provide less neuropsychological side-effects than thalamotomy, especially in Parkinson's disease.     

Staged lesions through implanted deep brain stimulating electrodes: a new surgical procedure for treating tremor or dyskinesias.

Thalamotomy and pallidotomy have been shown to have some efficacy for treating some movement disorders such as disabling tremor or parkinsonian levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID). Compared to continuous deep brain stimulation (DBS), this surgical procedure has the disadvantage of irreversibility and a lack of adaptability. Making a lesion involves a risk of inducing permanent side effects, especially if the lesion is large, or of observing a resurgence of the symptoms if the lesion is too small. We performed unilateral pallidotomy in one patient suffering from LID and unilateral thalamotomy in two patients suffering from tremor through the lead classically used for DBS. The technique of lead implantation was similar to that used for DBS treatment but, instead of connecting the lead to a pulse generator, it was left in place and used to make a radiofrequency lesion. This technique allowed the lesion to be kept as small as possible, thereby minimizing the risk of permanent side effects and made possible to extend the lesion if the symptoms reappeared. One lesioning session was enough to relieve tremor in the two patients treated by thalamotomy; three lesioning sessions over a 7-month period were required to relieve drug-induced dyskinesias in the patient treated by pallidotomy. In all 3 patients, disabling symptoms were still relieved without any permanent side effects 6 months after the last lesion was performed.     

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in tremor dominant parkinsonian patients with previous thalamic surgery

Before the introduction of high frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), many disabled tremor dominant parkinsonian patients underwent lesioning or chronic electrical stimulation of the thalamus. We studied the effects of STN stimulation in patients with previous ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) surgery whose motor state worsened. Fifteen parkinsonian patients were included in this study: nine with unilateral and two with bilateral VIM stimulation, three with unilateral thalamotomy, and one with both unilateral thalamotomy and contralateral VIM stimulation. The clinical evaluation consisted of a formal motor assessment using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and neuropsychological tests encompassing a 50 point frontal scale, the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory. The first surgical procedure was performed a mean (SD) of 8 (5) years after the onset of disease. STN implantation was carried out 10 (4) years later, and duration of follow up after beginning STN stimulation was 24 (20) months. The UPDRS motor score, tremor score, difficulties in performance of activities of daily living, and levodopa equivalent daily dose significantly decreased after STN stimulation. Neither axial symptoms nor neuropsychological status significantly worsened after the implantation of the STN electrodes. The parkinsonian motor state is greatly improved by bilateral STN stimulation even in patients with previous thalamic surgery, and STN stimulation is more effective than VIM stimulation in tremor dominant parkinsonian patients.     

Uniform qualitative electrophysiological changes in postoperative rest tremor.

Ablation and deep brain stimulation (DBS) can treat pharmacologically uncontrollable tremor. Here, we compared the postoperative electrophysiological changes in resting hand tremor after 32 ablations and 12 DBS implantations in patients with severe tremor-dominant idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). Short- and long-term accelerometric data were acquired after surgery and were compared to the preoperative tremor. After effective surgical treatments, significant rest tremor reduction and increase in both frequency and approximate entropy (ApEn) were detected in all PD cases, irrespective of the type and target of intervention. However, the long-term effect of DBS implantation on tremor reduction was significantly better compared to that after ablative treatments. In cases of thalamotomy, the postoperative increase in frequency and ApEn was significantly larger in essential tremor compared to PD, suggesting that the etiology of tremor may influence the size of the similar changes. However, cases where clinical tremor re-emerged 6 to 12 months after the surgery, no change in frequency and ApEn was detected on the second postoperative day, despite an initial tremor reduction and clinical improvement similar to the effective operations. Our results suggest that uniform postoperative changes in rest tremor and the increase in frequency and ApEn could be due to attenuation of pathological oscillators and might be immediate indicators of the effectiveness of neurosurgical treatments relieving tremor.