A phase II randomized study of the virologic and immunologic effect of zidovudine + stavudine versus stavudine alone and zidovudine + lamivudine in patients with >300 CD4 cells who were antiretroviral naive (ACTG 298)

Before the development of multidrug regimens for treatment of patients with HIV infection single or dual nucleoside therapy was the standard of care. The present study was designed to examine the relative short (12-week) and long-term (48-week) activity of zidovudine (ZDV) vs stavudine (d4T) vs the combination in antiretroviral naive patients. The study was modified so that lamivudine (3TC) was added to ZDV after 12 weeks of monotherapy. A total of 129 subjects entered the study; however, not all were followed for 48 weeks as the study was terminated early due to changing standards of care. The median baseline viral load and CD4 cell count were 10,008 copies/ml and 407 cells/mm(3), respectively. There were no significant differences in the initial (12-week) change in viral load across the three arms. The viral load reduction at 48 weeks was greater in the ZDV/ZDV plus 3TC arm, with an average change of -0.91 log(10) copies/ml than in the d4T alone (-0.47 log(10) copies/ml) or d4T plus ZDV (-0.33 log(10) copies/ml), p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively. There was a marginally significant increase in the CD4 cell count at Week 12 in the d4T arm as compared to the ZDV/ZDV plus 3TC arm. In general the treatments were well tolerated. The combination of d4T plus ZDV did not result in additional antiviral suppression as compared to either drug alone at 12 weeks and appeared to have less antiviral activity after Week 12. Based on this study and other data, combining d4T and ZDV is not recommended.     

A comparison of stavudine, didanosine and indinavir with zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infected individuals: selection of thymidine analog regimen therapy (START II)

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of stavudine (d4T), didanosine (ddI) and indinavir (IDV) with zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC) and IDV in HIV-1 infected patients. DESIGN: Randomized, open-label. SETTING: Fourteen HIV Clinical Research Centers. PATIENTS: Two-hundred and five patients with less than 4 weeks antiretroviral treatment, naive to 3TC and protease inhibitors and with CD4 cell counts > or = 200 x 10(6)/l and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels > or = 10,000 copies/ml. INTERVENTIONS: Stavudine 40 mg and ddI 200 mg twice daily plus IDV 800 mg every 8 h compared with ZDV 200 mg every 8 h or 300 mg twice daily, 3TC 150 mg twice daily plus IDV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels < 500 copies/ml and < or = 50 copies/ml and changes in CD4 cell counts were compared. RESULTS: In an analysis of the primary endpoint, 61% of patients on d4T + ddI + IDV and 45% of patients on ZDV + 3TC + IDV had all HIV-1 RNA values obtained between weeks 40 and 48 < 500 copies/ml [95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between proportions, 1.7-30.3%; P = 0.038]. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the percentage of all patients randomized with all HIV-1 RNA levels < 500 copies/ml between 40 and 48 weeks were 53% for the d4T + ddI + IDV arm and 41% for the ZDV + 3TC + IDV arm (95% CI, -1.4% to 25.7%; P = 0.068). At 48 weeks 41% and 35% were < or = 50 copies/ml for the stavudine- and ZDV-containing arms respectively (P > 0.2). The median time-weighted average increases in CD4 cells count over 48 weeks were 150 x 10(6)/l cells for the d4T arm and 106 x 10(6)/l cells for the ZDV arm (P= 0.001). The occurrence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between arms. CONCLUSION: The combination of stavudine, ddl and IDV resulted in potent antiretroviral effects over a 48-week period, comparable or superior to zidovudine, 3TC and IDV supporting the use of stavudine, ddI and a protease inhibitor as an initial antiretroviral treatment.     

Effects of treatment intensification with hydroxyurea in HIV-infected patients with virologic suppression

BACKGROUND: Virologic rebound can result from suboptimal antiviral potency in combination antiretroviral therapy. DESIGN: Multicenter, partially blinded, prospective, randomized study of 202 HIV-infected subjects to determine whether therapy intensification improves long-term rates of virologic suppression. METHODS: Subjects had plasma HIV RNA < 200 copies/ml, CD4 cell count of > 200 x 10(6) cells/l, and treatment with indinavir (IDV) + zidovudine (ZDV) + lamivudine (3TC) for at least 6 months before randomization to stay on this regimen or to receive IDV + didanosine (ddI) + stavudine (d4T) plus or minus hydroxyurea (HU) (600 mg twice daily). Treatment failure was defined as either confirmed rebound of HIV RNA level to > 200 copies/ml or a drug toxicity necessitating treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: Treatment failure occurred more frequently in subjects randomized to the HU-containing arm (32.4%), than in those taking IDV + ddI + d4T (17.6%) or IDV + ZDV + 3TC (7.6%). The time to treatment failure was shorter for the HU-containing arm compared with the IDV + ZDV + 3TC (P < 0.0001) or IDV + ddI + d4T arms (P = 0.032). Dose-limiting toxicities rather than virologic rebound accounted for the differences between treatment failure among the study arms. Pancreatitis led to treatment discontinuation in 4% of subjects in treatment arms containing ddI + d4T. Three subjects with pancreatitis died, all randomized to the HU-containing arm. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to IDV + ddI + d4T + HU in patients treated with IDV + ZDV + 3TC was associated with a worse outcome, principally because of drug toxicity.     

Randomized study of didanosine monotherapy and combination therapy with zidovudine in hemophilic and nonhemophilic subjects with asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection. AIDS Clinical Trial Groups

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of didanosine (ddl) monotherapy and three different combinations of zidovudine (ZDV) and ddl in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection, we conducted an open-label, phase I/II study in 126 asymptomatic HIV-1- infected hemophilic and nonhemophilic subjects with a CD4 count of 200 to 500/mm3 stratified for prior zidovudine treatment and baseline CD4 count. Study arms included arm A, low-dose combination (ZDV 150 mg and ddl 134 mg, daily); arm B, moderate-dose combination (ZDV 300 mg and ddI 334 mg, daily); arm C, high-dose combination (ZDV 600 mg and ddl 500 mg, daily), and arm D, ddl monotherapy (ddl 500 mg, daily). Earlier, more frequent hepatotoxicity was experienced by hemophilic subjects (P = .008), but there were no differences in toxicity between treatment arms (P = .51), nor were there any differences in the rate of development of clinical endpoints by treatment (P = .41). Smaller median CD4 increases occurred over the first 12 weeks for arms A and D, 44/mm3 and 42/mm3, than arms B and C, 105/mm3 and 114/mm3, respectively, (P = .015). Hemophilia status (P = .0004) and prior ZDV experience (P = .044) independently predicted weaker CD4 responses during the first 12 weeks of treatment. Using a regression model and adjusting for hemophilia status, prior ZDV treatment, and baseline CD4, there was a significant reduction in quantitative viral load from baseline by week 12 for all treatment arms combined (P = .0001), with significantly lower median percent reduction for arm A (56.3%) than arms B, C, and D (94.6%, 98.5%, and 91.9%, respectively, P = .015). Although greater hepatoxicity and weaker CD4 responses occur in hemophilic subjects, didanosine monotherapy and combination therapy with zidovudine are safe and effective in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients.     

A comparison of stavudine plus lamivudine versus zidovudine plus lamivudine in combination with indinavir in antiretroviral naive individuals with HIV infection: selection of thymidine analog regimen therapy (START I)

BACKGROUND: No clinical trial results directly comparing two nucleoside analog pairs in a drug regimen for HIV that includes a protease inhibitor are available. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of stavudine (d4T) + lamivudine (3TC) with zidovudine (ZDV) + 3TC, each in combination with indinavir (IDV). DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, multi-center. SETTING: Fifteen HIV clinical research centers. PATIENTS: Two-hundred and four antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected-patients with CD4 cell counts > or = 200 x 10(6)/l and HIV-1 RNA > or = 10,000 copies/ml (bDNA assay), modified to 5000 copies/ml. INTERVENTION: d4T 40 mg twice a day, 3TC 150 mg twice a day plus IDV 800 mg every 8 h compared with ZDV 200 mg every 8 h (modified to 300 mg every 12 h) plus 3TC and IDV. MEASUREMENTS: Primary endpoint: plasma HIV-1 RNA < 500 copies/ml. Additional endpoints: HIV-1 RNA < or = 50 copies/ml; change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell counts; safety and adverse events. RESULTS: For HIV-1 RNA, 62% of patients on d4T + 3TC + IDV and 54% of patients on ZDV + 3TC + IDV had < 500 copies/ml HIV RNA at weeks 40 through 48 [90% confidence interval, -0.204 to 0.036; P= 0.213], with 49% and 47% respectively achieving < or = 50 copies/ml at 48 weeks (90% CI, -0.134 to 0.096; P = 0.834). Median change in CD4 cell counts at 48 weeks was +227 x 10(6)/l and +198 x 10(6)/l for the d4T- and ZDV-containing arms, respectively. The median time-weighted average change from baseline in CD4 cell counts was significantly greater at 48 weeks in the d4T-containing arm (142 x 10(6)/l versus 110 x 10(6)/l; P = 0.033). Serious adverse events were not significantly different between treatment arms, but there were significant differences for frequency of adverse events of all severity with increased nausea and vomiting in the ZDV-containing arm, and increased diarrhea and rash in the d4T-containing arm. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the choice of d4T + 3TC as a nucleoside analog pair in combination with a protease inhibitor in an initial HIV treatment regimen.     

Effect of lamivudine in HIV-infected persons with prior exposure to zidovudine/didanosine or zidovudine/zalcitabine

Nucleoside analog-based regimens remain an integral component of combination therapy for use in both antiretroviral treatment-naive and experienced HIV-infected patients. To further define treatment responses to new antiretroviral therapy in patients with long-term experience to dual nucleoside analog therapy (zidovudine [ZDV] plus didanosine [ddI] or ZDV plus zalcitabine [ddC]), 325 subjects derived from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 175 trial were randomized to three different combination regimens: (1) continuation of ZDV + ddI or ZDV + ddC (continuation arm), (2) addition of 3TC to ZDV + ddI or ZDV + ddC (addition arm), or (3) a switch to ZDV + 3TC therapy (switch arm). Both the addition and switch arms sustained significantly greater short-term (baseline to week 4) mean CD4+ cell count increases compared with the continuation arm (+36, +28 versus -4 cells/mm3; p = 0.012) and long-term CD4+ cell count responses (baseline to weeks 40/48: +32, +19 versus -9 cells/mm3; p = 0.003). Superior short-term (baseline to week 8) mean decreases in plasma HIV RNA (p < 0.001) were achieved by both the addition and switch arms (0.53 log10 and 0.54 log10 copies/ml, respectively) compared with the continuation arm (0.13 copies/ml) whereas no differences in long-term virologic suppression were observed (p = 0.30). At week 48, no differences were observed in the proportions of subjects who had HIV RNA levels below 500 copies/mL: 18% of subjects in each treatment arm (3-way p = 1.0). Overall, the treatments were well tolerated and only nine subjects (3%) died or developed one or more AIDS-defining events. While this study confirms the intrinsic antiretroviral activity of 3TC, only modest marker changes and limited short-term viral suppression are seen with incremental addition of the drug. The current approach of using 3TC in maximally suppressive regimens is preferred.     

Maternal 12-month response to antiretroviral therapy following prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV type 1, Ivory Coast, 2003-2006.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study the response to antiretroviral treatment among women exposed to single-dose nevirapine (NVP) and/or short-course zidovudine (ZDV; with or without lamivudine [3TC]) for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. METHODS: All HIV type 1-infected women who initiated antiretroviral treatment with stavudine or ZDV, 3TC, and NVP or efavirenz were eligible for the MTCT-Plus program in Abidjan, Ivory Coast. Exposed women had received either single-dose NVP alone or short-course ZDV (with or without 3TC) plus single-dose NVP during previous pregnancy. Genotypic resistance testing was performed at week 4 after delivery. Virologic failure was defined as a plasma HIV RNA level >500 copies/mL 12 months after initiation of antiretroviral treatment. RESULTS: Among 247 women who received antiretroviral treatment, 109 (44%) were unexposed; 81 had received short-course ZDV with 3TC, as well as single-dose NVP; 5 had received short-course ZDV plus 3TC; 50 had received short-course ZDV plus single-dose NVP; and 2 had received single-dose NVP alone. No ZDV mutation was detected in the 115 women whose specimens were available for genotypic testing; 11 (15.1%) of 73 women with 3TC exposure who were tested after delivery had 3TC resistance mutations. Three (4.3%) of 69 women exposed to short-course ZDV and 3TC plus single-dose NVP and 16 (38.1%) of 42 women exposed to short-course ZDV plus single-dose NVP had NVP resistance mutations. Antiretroviral treatment was initiated a median of 21 months after the intervention to prevent mother-to-child HIV transmission (median CD4(+) T lymphocyte count, 188 cells/mm(3)). Month 12 virologic failure was identified in 42 (19.2%) of 219 women for whom data were available, and multivariate analysis revealed that it was associated with poor adherence to treatment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 12.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-53.9), postpartum 3TC resistance mutations (aOR, 6.9; 95% CI, 1.1-42.9), and a baseline CD4(+) T lymphocyte count <200 cells/mm(3) (aOR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8). NVP resistance was not associated with virological failure (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.5-6.5). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that poor adherence and 3TC resistance acquired after the intervention to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection were associated with virologic failure in women who initiated antiretroviral treatment.     

Fat tissue distribution changes in HIV-infected patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Results of the MONARK trial

Given the decline in mortality among HIV-infected patients, it has become increasingly important to consider delayed disease-related and/or anti-HIV therapy-related adverse effects, such as lipodystrophy, when choosing initial therapy. Data from the MONARK trial allowed for comparison of the potential lipodystrophic effects of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy with those of triple therapy with LPV/r plus zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC). This was a randomized, open-label, multinational study that included 136 antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients. A portion of study patients underwent evaluations of limb and trunk fat tissue by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 48 weeks of treatment (and 96 weeks in some patients). Sixty-three patients had paired absorptiometry data at baseline and week 48 (13 patients at week 96). At week 48, median change in limb fat was -63 g on LPV/r monotherapy versus -703 g on LPV/r + ZDV/3TC triple therapy (p=0.014). The proportion of patients with fat loss (>20% loss in limb fat) was significantly lower with LPV/r monotherapy (4.9% versus 27.3%; p=0.018). Changes in trunk fat did not differ significantly between treatments. Nonetheless, limb fat and trunk fat varied in the same direction with both treatments. The decrease in arm lean mass was also significantly less in patients receiving LPV/r monotherapy. Only treatment type emerged as a significant predictor of fat loss (odds ratio, 7.06; 95% CI, 1.11-78.69). These results suggest that LPV/r, and possibly other protease inhibitors, may not be the main contributor to lipoatrophy in HIV-infected patients receiving triple therapy.     

T cell changes after combined nucleoside analogue therapy in HIV primary infection.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the immune changes after treatment of acute HIV-1 infection with triple nucleoside analogue therapy. DESIGN: Immunological and virological parameters were monitored from day 0 to weeks 36-44 in eight patients [median CD4 cells = 451 cells/microl (range: 149-624), viral load = 4.8 log10 copies/ml (range: 6.5-3.3)] who started at time of primary HIV infection (PHI) a therapy including zidovudine (ZDV), didanosine (ddl), and lamivudine (3TC). METHODS: Lymphoid subsets were evaluated on peripheral blood lymphocytes by four-colour flow cytometry using a panel of mAbs directed against differentiation and activation markers. RESULTS: We observed a median -2.1 (range: -1; -3.3) log10 copies/ml viral load decrease and a median +158 cells/microl (range: +7 to +316) CD4 cell count increase at week 4 reaching normal CD4 cell count values of 761 CD4 cells/microl (range: 389-1153) at weeks 36-44. Virus undetectability was obtained at week 24 for all subjects. A rapid CD4 T cell amplification involved both memory and naive CD4 T cells. This was associated with a very rapid and significant decrease in activation markers [human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR), CD38] on both CD4 and CD8 T cell subsets together with a CD8+CD28+ cell increase as early as week 4. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that early therapy with nucleoside analogues can correct the immunological abnormalities observed in CD4 and CD8 T cell subsets at the time of PHI. This early kinetics in T cell recovery appears to be faster than in established disease.     

Field efficacy of zidovudine, lamivudine and single-dose nevirapine to prevent peripartum HIV transmission

OBJECTIVES: In Africa, single-dose nevirapine (NVPsd), short regimens of zidovudine (ZDV) or ZDV + lamivudine (3TC) are recommended to prevent peripartum mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT). We evaluated the 6-week field efficacy of two more PMTCT drug combinations. DESIGN: An open-label intervention cohort in Abidjan. METHODS: In 2001-2002, consenting women started oral ZDV 300 mg twice daily (bid) at > or =36 weeks of gestation, with 600 mg of ZDV + 200 mg NVPsd orally at beginning of labour. In 2002-2003, the antepartum regimen at > or =32 weeks comprised ZDV as previously + 3TC 150 mg bid; the labour dose comprised ZDV + NVPsd as previously + 300 mg 3TC orally. Neonates received ZDV syrup (2 mg/kg per 6 h) for 7 days + NVPsd syrup (2 mg/kg) on day 2 in both periods. Each woman was assisted to either use breast milk substitutes or breastfeed exclusively. Paediatric HIV infection was diagnosed by plasma HIV RNA viral load at 4 weeks, confirmed at 6 weeks. The reference group was a cohort receiving a short regimen of ZDV > or = 36-38 weeks in 1995-2000 in the same population. RESULTS: A total of 1144 HIV-infected pregnant women were included: 351 with ZDV, 420 with ZDV + NVPsd and 373 with ZDV + 3TC + NVPsd; 1010 livebirths were eligible for analysis; 79 children were HIV-infected peripartum. Six-week transmission probability was 6.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.9-9.1%) with ZDV + NVPsd, a 72% reduction compared with ZDV alone (95% CI, 52-88%; P = 0.0002 adjusted on maternal CD4, clinical stage and breastfeeding). It was 4.7% (95% CI, 2.4-7.0%) with ZDV + 3TC + NVPsd (P = 0.34 compared with ZDV + NVPsd). CONCLUSIONS: A short-course of ZDV + NVPsd prevents most peripartum HIV transmission in Africa. This regimen could be added to international guidelines.     

A 1-year trial of telbivudine, lamivudine, and the combination in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A previous 4-week trial of telbivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B indicated marked antiviral effects with good tolerability, leading to the present 1-year phase 2b trial. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of telbivudine 400 or 600 mg/day and telbivudine 400 or 600 mg/day plus lamivudine 100 mg/day (Comb400 and Comb600) compared with lamivudine 100 mg/day in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive adults with compensated chronic hepatitis B. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 among the 5 groups. Median reductions in serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels at week 52 (log(10) copies/mL) were as follows: lamivudine, 4.66; telbivudine 400 mg, 6.43; telbivudine 600 mg, 6.09; Comb400, 6.40; and Comb600, 6.05. At week 52, telbivudine monotherapy showed a significantly greater mean reduction in HBV DNA levels (6.01 vs 4.57 log(10) copies/mL; P < .05), clearance of polymerase chain reaction-detectable HBV DNA (61% vs 32%; P < .05), and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels (86% vs 63%; P < .05) compared with lamivudine monotherapy, with proportionally greater HBeAg seroconversion (31% vs 22%) and less viral breakthrough (4.5% vs 15.8%) (P = NS for both). Combination treatment was not better than telbivudine alone. All treatments were well tolerated. In exploratory scientific analyses, clinical efficacy at 1 year appeared related to reduction in HBV DNA levels in the first 6 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic hepatitis B treated with telbivudine exhibited significantly greater virologic and biochemical responses compared with lamivudine. Results with the combination regimens were similar to those obtained with telbivudine alone. These data support the ongoing phase 3 evaluation of telbivudine for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B.     

The efficacy of combined zidovudine and lamivudine compared with that of combined zidovudine,lamivudine and nelfinavir in asymptomatic and early symptomatic HIV-infected children

In this 6-month prospective study, we compared the efficacy of two treatment regimens: double-drug therapy with zidovudine (ZDV) and lamivudine (3TC) and triple-drug therapy with ZDV plus 3TC plus nelfinavir (NFV), in the treatment of asymptomatic and early symptomatic HIV-infected children. Twenty-five children were enrolled in this study and were divided into 2 groups: group A, consisting of 13 children who were given ZDV+3TC; group B, consisting of 12 children who were given ZDV+3TC+NFV. Serial determinations of weight, CD4-cell count, HIV RNA or plasma viral load (VL) and complete blood counts (CBC), liver function tests (LFT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) tests, creatinine and serum amylase tests were performed at study entry and at 1, 3 and 6 months. The side-effects of drugs were recorded. Over the 6-month period, the median weight increase in group B (24%) was higher than in group A (2%). The median CD4-cell count increase from baseline in group B (94.5%) was better than in group A (9.4%). The reduction of VL below baseline in group B (1.2 log10; 20.8%) was also better than in group A (0.72 log10; 13.8%). However, these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Both combination regimens could not completely suppress HIV RNA below detectable limits (<400 copies/ml). Both groups tolerated the regimens well; no side-effects or toxicities occurred. The efficacy levels of triple-drug therapy (ZDV+3TC+NFV) and double-drug therapy (ZDV+3TC) were not different. There were no side-effects and no deaths during the 6-month study period.     

A prospective, 96-week study of the impact of Trizivir, Combivir/nelfinavir, and lamivudine/stavudine/nelfinavir on lipids, metabolic parameters and efficacy in antiretroviral-naive patients: effect of sex and ethnicity

OBJECTIVES: To compare the lipid and metabolic effects, efficacy, and safety of twice-daily regimens of Trizivir (abacavir 300 mg/lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg triple nucleoside tablet; TZV), Combivir (lamivudine 150 mg/zidovudine 300 mg combination tablet; COM)+nelfinavir (NFV), and stavudine (d4 T)+lamivudine (3TC)+NFV. STUDY DESIGN: An international, phase 4, open-label, parallel-group, 34-centre study was conducted in 254 non-diabetic, antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected out-patients with an HIV-1 RNA level of >1000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and < or =200,000 copies/mL and a CD4 cell count of >50 cells/microL. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to TZV twice daily (n = 85), COM/NFV 1250 mg twice daily (n = 88), or d4T 40 mg+3TC 150 mg+NFV 1250 mg twice daily (n = 81) for 96 weeks. Treatments were compared using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with regard to changes from baseline in fasting lipids in the total population and in sex and ethnic subgroups. The proportions of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA <50 and <400 copies/mL were compared using a 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference between proportions. RESULTS: The study population was diverse (50% female, 40% black and 37% Hispanic). Mean baseline low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was 99 mg/dL, HIV-1 RNA was 4.43 log10 copies/mL and CD4 cell count was 355 cells/microL. At week 96, fasting LDL cholesterol changed minimally in the TZV group [least square mean (LSM) change from baseline, -8 mg/dL], but increased with d4T/3TC/NFV and COM/NFV (+29 and +19 mg/dL, respectively; P < 0.001 versus TZV). Week 96 LDL-cholesterol levels were significantly lower in the TZV group than in the other two treatment groups in women and men and lower than in the d4T/3TC/NFV group in Hispanic and black patients. In black patients, the week-96 LSM change from baseline in LDL cholesterol was significantly less with TZV than with d4T/3TC/NFV (+1 vs+39 mg/dL; P = 0.003). Total cholesterol >200 mg/dL occurred in a smaller proportion of patients receiving TZV (30%) compared with COM/NFV (50%) or d4T/3TC/NFV (60%; P = 0.005 vs TZV). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol did not change markedly with any treatment. Although triglycerides increased, they changed least in women and Hispanic patients receiving TZV. Virological and CD4 responses to the treatments were similar in the total population and in the subgroups. Diarrhoea was reported more often in the NFV arms and nausea in the ZDV arms. CONCLUSIONS: Over 96 weeks, TZV twice daily has significantly less effect on LDL cholesterol than COM/NFV or d4T/3TC/NFV twice daily, especially in women and black patients, and is associated with similar virological and CD4 responses.     

International, multicenter, randomized, controlled study comparing dynamically individualized versus standard treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to increase virologic response rates by individualized treatment according to the early virologic response. METHODS: Serum HCV-RNA was frequently quantified in patients with chronic hepatitis C (n=270) treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg/week) and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day). After 6 weeks patients were classified as rapid (RVR), slow (SPR), flat (FPR), or null responders (NUR) and randomized within each viral kinetic class to continue therapy either with an individualized or standard regimen. Individualized therapy comprised peginterferon monotherapy (48 weeks) or shorter combination therapy (24 weeks) for RVR, triple therapy with histamine (1 mg/day) (48 weeks) or prolonged combination therapy (72 weeks) for SPR, triple therapy for FPR, and high-dose peginterferon (360 microg/week) plus ribavirin for NUR patients. RESULTS: Patients were categorized as RVR (n=171), SPR (n=65), FPR (n=10), or NUR (n=22). Overall end-of-treatment and sustained virologic response rates were 77 and 60% in the individualized and 77 and 66% in the standard treatment arm, respectively. Histamine in addition to peginterferon and ribavirin and high-dose peginterferon plus ribavirin did not improve virologic response rates in patients with FPR and NUR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An improvement in virologic efficacy was not achieved with the available individualized treatment options.     

A phase II safety and efficacy study of amprenavir in combination with zidovudine and lamivudine in HIV-infected patients with limited antiretroviral experience. Amprenavir PROAB2002 Study Team

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of amprenavir (APV) in combination with lamivudine (3TC) and zidovudine (ZDV). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, partially blinded trial. SETTING: Nine study sites in the United States and Europe. PATIENTS: A group of 84 HIV-infected subjects with no prior 3TC or protease inhibitor therapy experience, CD4 cell count > or = 150 x 10(6) cells/l, and plasma HIV RNA > 10000 copies/ml. INTERVENTIONS: 3TC/ZDV with one of three doses of APV (900, 1050, or 1200 mg) versus 3TC/ZDV with 1050 mg placebo. All medications were dosed twice daily. The 1050 mg placebo and the APV 1050 mg dose were administered blinded. After 12 weeks, APV 1050 mg was substituted for 1050 mg placebo in the control group and the blind was maintained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in plasma HIV RNA from baseline; proportion of subjects with plasma HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml; and an increase in CD4 cell count from baseline. RESULTS: During the initial 12-week study period, APV/3TC/ZDV-treated subjects had greater viral suppression than the group receiving two nucleosides. By 48 weeks, 89% of subjects in the group taking the highest APV dose (1200 mg) had plasma HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml while 42% of the 900 mg group and 60% of the 3TC/ZDV group (1050 mg APV added at week 12) had plasma HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml using an as-treated analysis. By 60 weeks, 86% of subjects in the APV 1200 mg group had plasma HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml in the as-treated analysis, while 25% (900 mg), 43% (1050 mg), and 20% (1200 mg) of subjects had viral load <400 copies/ml in a strict intent-to-treat analysis owing to treatment discontinuations. Median CD4 cell count increases at week 60 were highest for the three treatment groups who received APV throughout the study, by intent-to-treat and as-treated analyses. The most common adverse events considered to be possibly drug related were nausea, rash, oral paresthesia, diarrhea, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with APV, dosed at 1200 mg twice daily in combination with 3TC/ZDV, resulted in sustained viral suppression. This combination represents a potent alternative initial antiretroviral regimen for protease inhibitor-naive individuals.     

Pharmacokinetics and safety of stavudine in HIV-infected pregnant women and their infants: Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 332

This study evaluates the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of stavudine (d4T) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected zidovudine (ZDV)-intolerant/refusing pregnant women and of single-dose d4T in their infants. Women received d4T and lamivudine (3TC) from enrollment until labor. During labor, women received oral 3TC and either intravenous or oral d4T. Infants received ZDV and 3TC for 6 weeks and a single dose of oral d4T at weeks 1 and 6. Mean maternal antenatal d4T pharmacokinetics (terminal plasma half-life [T1/2], 83.5+/-16.8 min; area under the plasma-concentration time curve [AUC0-infinity), 81.6+/-22.0 microg.min/mL; n=6) were not significantly different from those during labor (T(1/2), 87.3+/-24.7 min; AUC0-infinity, 88.1+/-16.6 microg.min/mL; n=6). Umbilical-cord and maternal plasma concentrations were not significantly different from one another. The oral clearance of d4T in infants was significantly greater at week 6 versus week 1 (6.8+/-1.0 vs. 5.6+/-1.2 mL/min/kg). There were no toxicities, in women or infants, that required discontinuation or modification of the study drug. No infants had positive HIV viral diagnostic tests. d4T with or without 3TC is a potential alternative to ZDV for HIV-infected pregnant women.     

Nucleoside combinations for antiretroviral therapy: efficacy of stavudine in combination with either didanosine or lamivudine

This paper reviews the results of three trials, HIV NAT002, AI455-053, and AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 306, all of which evaluated the effectiveness of stavudine (d4T)-containing two-nucleoside combinations in antiretroviral-naive patients with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. The latter two studies directly compared d4T plus didanosine (ddI) or lamivudine (3TC) versus zidovudine (ZDV) plus each of these two nucleosides. The combined results of the three trials support the conclusion that d4T can be used effectively in combination with either ddI or 3TC to reduce viral loads and increase CD4 cell counts in patients with HIV-1 infection. The results of AI455-053 and ACTG 306 show further that combination of d4T with either ddI or 3TC is at least as effective as the use of ZDV with these nucleosides.