Strontium ranelate: a novel treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of safety and efficacy

Strontium ranelate is a new orally administered agent for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis that reduces the risk of vertebral and hip fractures. Evidence for the safety and efficacy of strontium ranelate comes from two large multinational trials, the SOTI (Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention) and TROPOS (Treatment Of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis) studies. The SOTI study evaluated vertebral fracture prevention in 1649 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 69 y. The subjects all had at least one previous vertebral fracture and a low spine bone mineral density (BMD) (equivalent to a Hologic spine T-score below −1.9). The strontium ranelate group had a 41% lower risk of a new vertebral fracture than the placebo group over the three-year study period (relative risk [RR]=0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–0.73; p<0.001). The TROPOS study evaluated non-vertebral fracture prevention in 5091 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 77 y. The subjects were aged 74 y and over (or 70–74 y with one additional risk factor) and a low femoral neck BMD (equivalent to an NHANES III [Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey] T-score below −2.2). Over the three-year study period there was a 16% reduction in all non-vertebral fractures (RR=0.84; 95% CI 0.702–0.995; p=0.04) and a 19% reduction at the principal sites for non-vertebral fractures. The TROPOS study was not powered to investigate hip fracture risk. However, in a high risk group of women aged 74 y and over and with an NHANES III femoral neck T-score less than −2.4 there was a 36% reduction in hip fracture risk (RR=0.64; 95% CI: 0.412–0.997; p=0.046). The overall incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly from placebo and were generally mild and transient, the most common being nausea and diarrhea. Strontium ranelate is a useful addition to the range of anti-fracture treatments available for treating postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and is the only treatment proven to be effective at preventing both vertebral and hip fractures in women aged 80 y and over.     

Prevalence of depressive symptoms in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density and/or prevalent vertebral fracture: results from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) study

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of depressive symptoms in a cross-sectional study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis with and without prevalent vertebral fracture. METHODS: Participants were a subset of English-speaking women (n = 3798, mean age 66.7 yrs) from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation trial, who had low bone mineral density (BMD) and/or prevalent vertebral fractures. Vertebral fractures were measured at baseline by radiography using a semiquantitative technique. Depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), a valid and reliable scale for depression screening in elderly patients. Women were considered as probably depressed if > or = 6 symptoms of depression were reported. RESULTS: Postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fracture reported more depressive symptoms as assessed by the GDS than women without prevalent vertebral fracture (1.54 vs 1.26; p = 0.001). There was an absolute increase of 2.5% (p = 0.008) in the prevalence of probable depression (GDS score > or = 6) in women with prevalent fracture compared to those without prevalent fracture. The prevalence of probable depression was 4.1% among women without prevalent vertebral fracture and 6.6% in women with a prevalent vertebral fracture. The prevalence of probable depression was 3-fold higher in women with at least 3 prevalent vertebral fractures compared to women without prevalent fracture (12.8% vs 4.1%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures had greater prevalence of depressive symptoms and probable depression as assessed by the GDS than women without vertebral fracture with low BMD. The dual diagnosis of depression and osteoporosis may mean worse health outcomes. Patients with prevalent vertebral fractures may be considered not only for interventions that address fracture risk reduction, but also for psychosocial interventions that address depressive symptoms.     

Vertebral fracture risk reduction with risedronate in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The effect of risedronate, a potent pyridinyl bisphosphonate, on vertebral fractures in post-menopausal women was evaluated in randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. These trials included two large vertebral fracture studies that used time-to-event methods to evaluate the effects of treatment on fracture risk, thereby allowing both the occurrence and the timing of fractures to be considered. METHODS: We used individual patient data (IPD) and time-to-event methods to perform a meta-analysis of the anti-fracture efficacy of risedronate (2.5 or 5 mg daily) in osteoporotic women enrolled in five double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Women were included in the analysis if, at baseline, they had either at least one prevalent vertebral fracture or a femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of less than -2.5, were at least 1 year post-menopausal, and had had vertebral fracture assessments (N = 3331). RESULTS: Risedronate 5 mg daily reduced the risk of radiographically defined vertebral fracture by 64% (95% CI, 46 to 76%, p < 0.001) in the first year of treatment and 45% (95% CI, 31 to 57%, p < 0.001) in 3 years. The numbers of patients who needed to be treated with risedronate 5 mg to prevent one new vertebral fracture over 1 and 3 years were 21 and 13, respectively. Comparable findings were observed in sub-populations defined on the basis of either prevalent vertebral fracture without regard to femoral neck BMD, or femoral neck BMD without regard to vertebral fracture status. Risedronate significantly reduced the incidence of clinical (symptomatic) vertebral fractures in the first 6 months of treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis, based upon five trials and using IPD and time-to-event statistical methods, provides a more precise estimate of the effect of risedronate in reducing vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporotic women than a meta-analysis using summary statistics from the literature.     

Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study

BACKGROUND: Strontium ranelate, a new oral drug shown to reduce vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, was studied in the Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study to assess its efficacy and safety in preventing nonvertebral fractures also. METHODS: Strontium ranelate (2 g/d) or placebo were randomly allocated to 5091 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in a double-blind placebo-controlled 5-yr study with a main statistical analysis over 3 yr of treatment. FINDINGS: In the entire sample, relative risk (RR) was reduced by 16% for all nonvertebral fractures (P = 0.04), and by 19% for major fragility fractures (hip, wrist, pelvis and sacrum, ribs and sternum, clavicle, humerus) (P = 0.031) in strontium ranelate-treated patients in comparison with the placebo group. Among women at high risk of hip fracture (age > or = 74 yr and femoral neck bone mineral density T score < or = -3, corresponding to -2.4 according to NHANES reference) (n = 1977), the RR reduction for hip fracture was 36% (P = 0.046). RR of vertebral fractures was reduced by 39% (P < 0.001) in the 3640 patients with spinal x-rays and by 45% in the subgroup without prevalent vertebral fracture. Strontium ranelate increased bone mineral density throughout the study, reaching at 3 yr (P < 0.001): +8.2% (femoral neck) and +9.8% (total hip). Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that strontium ranelate significantly reduces the risk of all nonvertebral and in a high-risk subgroup, hip fractures over a 3-yr period, and is well tolerated. It confirms that strontium ranelate reduces vertebral fractures. Strontium ranelate offers a safe and effective means of reducing the risk of fracture associated with osteoporosis.     

Men suffer vertebral fractures with similar spinal T-scores to women

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the applicability of the WHO densitometric criteria for the diagnosis of spinal osteoporosis in men and to compare it with women with vertebral fractures, as well as to analyze the role of vertebral dimensions in the development of spinal fractures. METHODS: For these purposes we analyzed, using DXA, vertebral projected area and lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), as well as T and Z-scores in lumbar spine in a cohort of 66946 individuals; 2556 of these subjects had one or more atraumatic vertebral fracture (396 men and 2160 postmenopausal women). RESULTS: Men and women with fractures showed significantly lower mean BMD, T-score and Z-score values than individuals without fractures while vertebral dimensions were similar in both groups of patients. When comparing men and women with vertebral fractures, the former showed a significantly greater projected area (46.89+/-5.5 vs. 39.13+/-4.6 cm(2) p<0.001) and lumbar BMD (0.991+/- 0.21 vs. 0.938+/- t0.19 g/cm(2) p<0.001). However, the median lumbar T-score values were similar for both sexes (-2.3 in women vs. -2.2 in men; p: NS). In addition, a similar percentage of men and women with vertebral fractures showed T-score values <-2.5 in the lumbar spine (44% vs. 46%, p=NS). CONCLUSION: We conclude that although men with vertebral fractures have greater vertebral dimensions and BMD than women, the lumbar T-scores are similar. Therefore, it seems reasonable to adopt the same T-score values for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in men and women.     

绝经后妇女脊椎压缩性骨折与骨密度的关系

目的探讨绝经后妇女脊椎压缩性骨折与骨密度（BMD）的关系。方法为病例一对照研究，入选250例有脊椎压缩性骨折的绝经后妇女，另有250名无脊椎压缩性骨折的绝经后妇女作为对照组。两组均有胸腰椎正侧位X线摄片，并应用双能X线吸收仪检测腰椎1～4和左股骨近端各部位BMD。结果脊椎压缩性骨折组身高、体重、腰椎2～4和股骨近端各部位BMD值均显著低于对照组（均P〈0．01）。腰椎2～4BMD是发生脊柱骨折的预报因子（r=-0．416，P〈0．01）。身高和全髋部BMD与骨折次数和骨折椎体数目呈负相关（均P〈0．01）。按股骨颈和全髋部BMD值，骨折组骨质疏松检出率各为50．8％和50．4％；另外剔除在腰椎2～4发生椎体骨折53例，按腰椎2～4BMD检出骨质疏松占64．5％。同时，腰椎2～4、股骨颈或全髋部BMD值低于-2．5s者发生脊柱压缩性骨折的风险分别是BMD正常者的4．76、2．36和3．52倍。结论腰椎呈低骨量是发生脊椎压缩性骨折的重要危险因素。身高的下降和全髋部低BMD值是骨折发生次数和受累椎体数目的危险因子；对绝经后妇女在重视BMD测量的同时，应重视脊柱X线正侧位检查。     

Strontium ranelate: vertebral and non-vertebral fracture risk reduction

Fractures are common at the spine and hip, but at least half the morbidity and mortality of fractures in the community come from fractures that involve other sites. Over half of all fractures arise in individuals without osteoporosis, whereas the highest risk group for fractures are individuals over 80 years of age. Reducing the burden of fractures should thus include an assessment of drug efficacy against all fractures in a wide range of individuals. For vertebral fractures, in the phase III Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention study of 1649 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 2 g strontium ranelate a day produced a risk reduction of 49% in the first year and 41% during 3 years. In the TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis study, which was designed to examine the effect of strontium ranelate on non-vertebral fractures, of the 5091 patients, 3640 had spine X-rays. The vertebral fracture risk reduction was 45% at one year and 39% over 3 years. In a preplanned pooling of the above two studies, 1170 patients had vertebral osteopenia. Strontium ranelate reduced the risk of vertebral fracture in 3 years by 40% in these patients. In 409 patients with lumbar or femoral neck osteopenia, strontium ranelate reduced the risk of vertebral fractures by 62% over 3 years. In the pre-planned pooling of data from the two studies, in 1488 women aged between 80 and 100 years (mean age 84 +/- 3 years), the risk of vertebral fractures was reduced in one year by 59% and by 32% over 3 years. For non-vertebral fractures, in the TReatment Of Peripheral OSteoporosis study, treatment for 3 years reduced the fracture risk by 16%, and by 19% for major fragility fractures. In a post-hoc analysis of 1977 women at high risk of hip fracture (aged > or = 74 years and with a femoral neck bone mineral density T-score < or = -2.4) the hip fracture risk was reduced by 36%. In patients aged 80 and over in the pre-planned pooling of data from the two studies, the risk of an incident non-vertebral fracture was reduced by 41% in the first year and by 31% over 3 years. Strontium ranelate, a new anti-osteoporosis agent, has a broad range of antifracture efficacy.     

Assessment of the Relationship Between Age and the Effect of Risedronate Treatment in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Pooled Analysis of Four Studies

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the effect of age on the incidence of osteoporosis‐related fractures and of risedronate treatment on fracture risk in different age groups in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. DESIGN: Data from four randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, Phase III studies were pooled and analyzed. PARTICIPANTS: The analysis population (N=3,229) consisted of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis as determined on the basis of prevalent vertebral fractures, low bone mineral density (BMD), or both. INTERVENTION: Patients had received risedronate 5 mg daily or placebo for 1 to 3 years. MEASUREMENTS: The endpoints of interest were the incidence of osteoporosis‐related fractures, clinical fractures, nonvertebral fractures, and morphometric vertebral fractures. The effect of age on fracture risk and treatment benefit was examined using Cox regression models with age and treatment as explanatory variables. The 3‐year fracture risk was estimated for patients in each treatment group at a given age. RESULTS: Irrespective of treatment, fracture risks were greater in older patients (P<.001). On average, for every 1‐year increase in age, a patient's risk for osteoporosis‐related fracture increased 3.6% (95% confidence interval=2.3–5.0%). Irrespective of age, risedronate treatment reduced fracture risk 42%. Risedronate‐treated patients had fracture risks similar to those of placebo‐treated patients 10 to 20 years younger. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with risedronate have a significantly lower fracture risk, similar to that of untreated patients 10 to 20 years younger.     

Safety and efficacy of risedronate in reducing fracture risk in osteoporotic women aged 80 and older: implications for the use of antiresorptive agents in the old and oldest old

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of risedronate in reducing vertebral fracture risk in women aged 80 and older with osteoporosis. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of data from three randomized, double-blind, controlled, 3-year-fracture-endpoint trials conducted from November 1993 to April 1998: Hip Intervention Program (HIP), Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy-Multinational (VERT-MN), and VERT-North America (NA). SETTING: Office-based practices, research centers, and osteoporosis clinics in Europe, North America, and Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Osteoporotic (femoral neck bone mineral density T-score < -2.5 standard deviations or at least one prevalent vertebral fracture) women aged 80 and older. INTERVENTION: Patients received placebo (n=688) or risedronate 5 mg/d (n=704) for up to 3 years. All patients received 1,000 mg/d calcium and, if baseline levels were low, up to 500 IU/d vitamin D. MEASUREMENTS: Cumulative incidence of new vertebral fractures. RESULTS: After 1 year, the risk of new vertebral fractures in the risedronate group was 81% lower than with placebo (95% confidence interval=60-91%; P<.001). The number of women who needed to be treated to prevent one new vertebral fracture after 1 year was 12. This early onset of efficacy was consistent across the clinical programs, and antifracture efficacy was confirmed over 3 years. Risedronate was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable with that of placebo. CONCLUSION: These findings provide the first evidence that, even in the very old, reducing bone resorption rate remains an effective treatment strategy for osteoporosis. Because each therapeutic agent used for the treatment of osteoporosis may have unique characteristics, the observations made in this study should not be assumed to apply to other bisphosphonates.     

A clinical tool to determine the necessity of spine radiography in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis presenting with back pain

BACKGROUND: Vertebral fractures are underdiagnosed, although the resulting mortality and morbidity in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis is now recognised. In a population of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and back pain, symptoms may be related to vertebral fractures or degenerative changes of the spine. AIM: To evaluate a population of postmenopausal women presenting with back pain and factors associated with vertebral fractures which were assessable in a clinical setting in order to determine the necessity for spine radiography. METHODS: Patient questioning and physical examination were carried out and spinal radiographic data collected from 410 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, with an average age of 74 years, who consulted a rheumatologist for back pain. Of these, 215 (52.4%) patients were diagnosed with at least one vertebral fracture. Logistic regression was used to identify the most relevant clinical features associated with existing vertebral fractures, and to derive a quantitative index of risk. RESULTS: The model included six parameters: age, back pain intensity, height loss, history of low trauma non-vertebral fractures, thoracic localisation of back pain and sudden occurrence of back pain. The scoring system, or the quantitative index, had a maximal score of 16. For a score >or=7, the probability of existing vertebral fracture was >or=43%. The correlation between this quantitative index and the logistic model probability was 0.98, suggesting an excellent and highly significant approximation of the original prediction equation. CONCLUSIONS: From six clinical items, an index was built to identify women with osteoporosis and back pain who should have spine radiography. This simple tool may help clinicians to optimise vertebral fracture diagnosis and to make a proper therapeutic decision.     

Comparison of fracture, cardiovascular event, and breast cancer rates at 3 years in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES: To compare event rates for osteoporotic fractures, cardiovascular events, and breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study of the placebo group in the double-blind, randomized Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation trial. SETTING: One hundred eighty clinical research centers in 25 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women (n=2,565, mean age=67) with osteoporosis were given calcium (500 mg/d) and vitamin D (400-600 IU/d) supplements. MEASUREMENTS: The occurrence of at least one new fracture, cardiovascular event, or breast cancer diagnosis at 3 years was identified and adjudicated. RESULTS: The occurrence of any fracture was the most common event in these women. In women without prevalent vertebral fractures (n=1,627), the event rates per 1,000 patient-years were 45.4 for any fracture, 15.2 for vertebral fracture, 4.7 for clinical vertebral fracture, 0.9 for hip fracture, 8.3 for any cardiovascular event, and 5.2 for all breast cancer. In women with prevalent vertebral fractures (n=938), the event rates per 1,000 patient-years were 117.4 for any new fracture, 77.1 for new vertebral fracture, 25.7 for clinical vertebral fracture, 5.8 for hip fracture, 15.1 for any cardiovascular event, and 2.6 for all breast cancer. The effect of prevalent fracture status on event rates was not dependent on whether women were older or younger than 65, but women aged 65 and older had a 3.6 times greater occurrence of cardiovascular events than younger women, irrespective of prevalent fracture status. CONCLUSION: These data on the relative incidence of clinically significant skeletal and extra-skeletal outcomes may be useful in choosing an agent for health maintenance for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.     

Quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine,not dual x-ray absorptiometry,is an independent predictor of prevalent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia receiving long-term glucocorticoid and hormone-replacement therapy

OBJECTIVE: To determine which measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) predicts vertebral fractures in a cohort of postmenopausal women with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. METHODS: We recruited 114 subjects into the study. All had osteopenia of the lumbar spine or hip, as demonstrated by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and were receiving long-term glucocorticoids and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Measurements of BMD by DXA of the lumbar spine, hip (and subregions), and forearm (and subregions), quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the spine and hip (n = 59), and radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine were performed on all subjects to assess prevalent vertebral fractures. Vertebral fracture prevalence, as determined by morphometry, required a >or=20% (or >or=4-mm) loss of vertebral body height. Demographic information was obtained by questionnaire. Multiple regression and classification and regression trees (CART) analyses were used to assess predictors of vertebral fracture. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of the study subjects had prevalent fractures. BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip and hip subregions, as measured by QCT, but only the lumbar spine and total hip, as measured by DXA, were significantly associated with prevalent vertebral fractures. However, only lumbar spine BMD as measured by QCT was a significant predictor of vertebral fractures. CART analysis showed that a BMD value <0.065 gm/cm(3) was associated with a 7-fold higher risk of fracture than a BMD value >or=0.065 gm/cm(3).CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis induced by long-term glucocorticoid treatment who are also receiving HRT, BMD of the lumbar spine as measured by QCT, but not DXA, is an independent predictor of vertebral fractures.     

The relationship of health-related quality of life to prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of both prevalent and incident vertebral fractures on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and to characterize the effect of prevalent vertebral fractures on HRQOL with respect to number, location, severity, and adjacency. METHODS: Participants were a subset of women (n = 1,395, mean age 68.5 years) from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation trial who had low bone mineral density and/or prevalent vertebral fractures. Vertebral fractures were measured by radiography at baseline, 2 years, and 3 years. HRQOL was assessed using the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire (OPAQ), a validated disease-targeted instrument, at baseline and annually for 3 years. RESULTS: Both prevalent and incident radiographic vertebral fractures were associated with decreased HRQOL. At baseline, women with a prevalent vertebral fracture had significantly lower OPAQ scores on physical function, emotional status, clinical symptoms, and overall HRQOL compared with women without a prevalent fracture (all P < 0.01). HRQOL scores were lower with each subsequent fracture. The effect of prevalent vertebral fracture was dependent on the location within the spine and was strongest in the lumbar region (L1-L4). Incident vertebral fractures significantly decreased OPAQ scores on physical function, emotional status, clinical symptoms, and overall HRQOL (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate the importance of treating postmenopausal women who have prevalent vertebral fractures to prevent further decreases in HRQOL associated with subsequent incident vertebral fracture.     

Alendronate reduces the risk of multiple symptomatic fractures: results from the fracture intervention trial

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of alendronate on the occurrence rate of multiple svmptomatic fractures and on the risk of multiple symptomatic fractures (likelihood of having more than one fracture diagnosed because of the symptoms the fractures caused over the study period) among women with osteoporosis. DESIGN: Primary analysis of data from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. SETTING: Eleven community-based clinical research centers. PARTICIPANTS: Subset of women enrolled in the Fracture Intervention Trial: aged 55 to 81 and having at least one morphometric vertebral fracture at baseline (n=2,027) or having no vertebral fracture but meeting prevailing World Health Organization bone mineral density criteria for osteoporosis (T-score < or =2.5 at the femoral neck)(n = 1,631). INTERVENTION: All participants reporting calcium intake of 1,000 mg/day or less received a supplement of 500 mg calcium and 250 IU cholecalciferol. Participants were randomly assigned to placebo or alendronate sodium (5 mg/day for 2 years and 10 mg/day for the remainder of the study). Average total follow-up was 4.3 years. MEASUREMENTS: Symptomatic fractures were diagnosed by personal physicians and confirmed by review of radiological data by an expert committee blinded to treatment assignments. RESULTS: Eighty-six of 1,817 women receiving placebo experienced multiple symptomatic fractures during the follow-up period, compared with 51 of 1,841 receiving alendronate. Reduction of risk for multiple symptomatic fractures combined was 42% (relative risk (RR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.41, 0.81) and for multiple symptomatic vertebral fractures was 84% (RR = 0.16,95% Cl = 0.05, 0.42). Cumulative incidence curves showed divergence after as little as 3 months of treatment, with a statistically significant (P = .044) reduction at 6 months for multiple symptomatic vertebral fractures. When all fractures over the follow-up period were included, the occurrence rates of all symptomatic fractures and symptomatic vertebral fractures were 34% and 63% lower, respectively, with alendronate than with placebo. These reductions were sustained during the follow-up period. All reductions in risk were consistent across predefined subgroups: age (<75 vs > or =75), morphometric vertebral fracture(present vs absent), prior clinical fracture since age 45 (yes vs no), and whether the subject had fallen in the 12 months before randomization. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that treatment with alendronate reduces the risk of multiple symptomatic fractures during a treatment period averaging 4.3 years. The reductions were consistent across prespecified sub-groups. This effect is evident early in treatment and is sustained.     

Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with transdermal estrogen.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerance and effectiveness of transdermal estrogen for women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial lasting 1 year. SETTING: Referral-based outpatient clinic. PATIENTS: Seventy-five postmenopausal women, 47 to 75 years of age, with one or more vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis. INTERVENTIONS: Thirty-nine women received dermal patches delivering 0.1 mg of 17 beta-estradiol for days 1 to 21 and oral medroxyprogesterone acetate for days 11 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. Another 39 women received placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Bone turnover assessed by biochemical markers and iliac bone histomorphometry; bone loss assessed by serial measurement of bone density; and vertebral fracture rate. RESULTS: Compared with the placebo group, the median annual percentage change in bone mineral density in the estrogen group reflected increased or steady-state bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (5.3 compared with 0.2; P = 0.007), femoral trochanter (7.6 compared with 2.1; P = 0.03), and midradius (1.0 compared with -2.6, P less than 0.001) but showed no significant difference at the femoral neck (2.6 compared with 1.4; P = 0.17). Estrogen treatment uniformly decreased bone turnover as assessed by several methods including serum osteocalcin concentration (median change, -0.35 compared with 0.02 nmol/L; P less than 0.001). Histomorphometric evaluation of iliac biopsy samples confirmed the effect of estrogen on bone formation rate per bone volume (median change, -12.9 compared with -6.2% per year; P = 0.004). Also, 8 new fractures occurred in 7 women in the estrogen group, whereas 20 occurred in 12 women in the placebo group, yielding a lower vertebral fracture rate in the estrogen group (relative risk, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Transdermal estradiol treatment is effective in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis.     

A multicenter cross sectional study on bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis. Italian Study Group on Bone Mass in Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of osteoporosis in a large cohort of women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to investigate the main determinants of bone mineral density (BMD) and risk factors for vertebral fractures in this population. METHODS: We recruited 925 consecutive female patients with RA at 21 Rheumatology Centers in Italy. For each patient pre-registered demographic, disease, and treatment-related variables were collected. BMD was measured at lumbar spine and proximal femur by dual x-ray absorptiometry technique. Collected variables underwent a univariate and multivariate statistical procedure. Osteoporosis was defined as BMD > -2.5 T score. RESULTS: The frequency of osteoporosis in the whole sample was 28.8% at lumbar spine and 36.2% at femoral neck and increased linearly from Steinbrocker's functional stage I to IV (p = 0.0001). Patients with spinal or femoral osteoporosis were significantly older (p = 0.0001), had a lower body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.02), a significantly longer disease duration (p < 0.02) and a significantly higher Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score (p = 0.0001). These differences were significant, even after adjusting for age. Steroid use was associated with significantly lower lumbar and femoral BMD (p = 0.0001) even after adjusting for the main confounding covariates. Analysis of lateral spine radiographs revealed 74 women with at least one vertebral fracture. These women had a significantly lower lumbar and femoral BMD (p = 0.0001). The generalized linear model showed that steroid use, menopause, BMI, age, and HAQ were all significant independent predictors of lumbar and femoral BMD. The logistic procedure showed that age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07), HAQ (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.07-1.7), menopause (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2), use of steroids (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.07-2.1), and BMI (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.8-0.9) were significantly associated with the risk for osteoporosis. The only variables associated with an increased risk for vertebral fracture were age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08), HAQ (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.08-2.09), and cumulative steroid intake (OR for 1 g of prednisone 1.03, 95% CI 1.006-1.07). CONCLUSION: To prevent osteoporosis and its dramatic complications in RA the therapeutic challenge is to preserve functional capacity using the lowest possible dosage of corticosteroids.     

Risedronate prevents new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women at high risk

Independent risk factors for fracture include advanced age, preexisting fractures, and low bone mineral density. Rised-ronate has been shown in several large trials to be safe and effective for patients with osteoporosis, but its effects in populations at high risk are not well characterized. To determine the effect of risedronate on vertebral fracture in high-risk subjects, we pooled data from two randomized, double-blind studies [Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Multinational (VERT-MN) and VERT-North America (VERT-NA)] in 3684 postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated with placebo or risedronate 2.5 or 5 mg/d and analyzed fracture risk in subgroups of subjects at high risk for fracture due to greater age or more prevalent fractures (vs. median for overall study population), or lower bone mineral density (T-score, -2.5 or less). Fractures were diagnosed by quantitative and semiquantitative assessment of radiographs at baseline and 1 yr. In the overall population, treatment for 1 yr with risedronate 5 mg/d reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures by 62% vs. control (relative risk, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.25, 0.56; P < 0.001) and of multiple new vertebral fractures by 90% vs. control (relative risk, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.04, 0.26; P < 0.001). Consistent risk reductions were observed at 1 yr in the risedronate-treated high-risk subgroups. Significant reduction in fracture risk after 1 yr is an important benefit in patients at high risk for fracture because, without treatment, these patients are likely to sustain new fractures in the near term.     

Effects of long-term strontium ranelate treatment on the risk of nonvertebral and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis: Results of a five-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the effect of strontium ranelate on nonvertebral and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 5,091 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to receive either strontium ranelate at 2 gm/day or placebo for 5 years. The main efficacy criterion was the incidence of nonvertebral fractures. In addition, incidence of hip fractures was assessed, by post hoc analysis, in the subset of 1,128 patients who were at high risk of fractures (age 74 years or older with lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density T scores -2.4 or less). The incidence of new vertebral fractures was assessed, using the semiquantitative method described by Genant, in the 3,646 patients in whom spinal radiography (a nonmandatory procedure) was performed during the course of the study. Fracture data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method. RESULTS: Of the 5,091 patients, 2,714 (53%) completed the study up to 5 years. The risk of nonvertebral fracture was reduced by 15% in the strontium ranelate group compared with the placebo group (relative risk 0.85 [95% confidence interval 0.73-0.99]). The risk of hip fracture was decreased by 43% (relative risk 0.57 [95% confidence interval 0.33-0.97]), and the risk of vertebral fracture was decreased by 24% (relative risk 0.76 [95% CI 0.65-0.88]) in the strontium ranelate group. After 5 years, the safety profile of strontium ranelate remained unchanged compared with the 3-year findings. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with strontium ranelate results in a sustained reduction in the incidence of osteoporotic nonvertebral fractures, including hip fractures, and vertebral fractures over 5 years.     

Efficacy and Safety of a Once‐Yearly Intravenous Zoledronic Acid 5 mg for Fracture Prevention in Elderly Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis Aged 75 and Older

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of once‐yearly intravenous zoledronic acid (ZOL) 5 mg in reducing risk of clinical vertebral, nonvertebral, and any clinical fractures in elderly osteoporotic postmenopausal women. DESIGN: A post hoc subgroup analysis of pooled data from the Health Outcome and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid One Yearly (HORIZON) Pivotal Fracture Trial and the HORIZON Recurrent Fracture Trial. SETTING: Multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: Postmenopausal women (aged ≥75) with documented osteoporosis (T‐score ≤?2.5 at femoral neck or ≥1 prevalent vertebral or hip fracture) or a recent hip fracture. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of ZOL 5 mg (n=1,961) or placebo (n=1,926) at baseline and 12 and 24 months. MEASUREMENTS: Primary endpoints were incidence of clinical vertebral and nonvertebral and any clinical fracture after treatment. RESULTS: At 3 years, incidence of any clinical, clinical vertebral, and nonvertebral fracture were significantly lower in the ZOL group than in the placebo group (10.8% vs 16.6%, 1.1% vs 3.7%, and 9.9% vs 13.7%, respectively) (hazard ratio (HR)=0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.54–0.78, P<.001; HR=0.34, 95% CI=0.21–0.55, P<.001; and HR=0.73, 95% CI=0.60–0.90, P=.002, respectively). The incidence of hip fracture was lower with ZOL but did not reach statistical significance. The incidence rate of postdose adverse events were higher with ZOL, although the rate of serious adverse events and deaths was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Once‐yearly intravenous ZOL 5 mg was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of new clinical fractures (vertebral and nonvertebral) in elderly postmenopausal women with osteroporosis.     

Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the Fracture Intervention Trial. FIT Research Group

We examined the effect of alendronate treatment for 3-4 yr on risk of new fracture among 3658 women with osteoporosis enrolled in the Fracture Intervention Trial. This cohort included women with existing vertebral fracture and those with osteoporosis as defined by T score of less than -2.5 at the femoral neck but without vertebral fracture. All analyses were prespecified in the data analysis plan. The magnitudes of reduction of fracture incidence with alendronate were similar in both groups. The two groups were, therefore, pooled to obtain a more precise estimate of the effect of alendronate on relative risk of fracture (relative risk, 95% confidence interval): hip (0.47, 0.26-0.79), radiographic vertebral (0.52, 0.42-0.66), clinical vertebral (0.55, 0.36-0.82), and all clinical fractures (0.70, 0.59-0.82). Reductions in risk of clinical fracture were statistically significant by 12 months into the trial. We conclude that reductions in fracture risk during treatment with alendronate are consistent in women with existing vertebral fractures and those without such fractures but with bone mineral density in the osteoporotic range. Furthermore, reduction in risk is evident early in the course of treatment. This pooled analysis provides a more precise estimate of the antifracture efficacy of alendronate in women with osteoporosis than that in prior reports.