Use of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as induction and maintenance in simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplantation

Abstract Clinical trials using quadruple immunosuppression that include the combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes in simultaneous pancreas‐kidney (SPK) transplantation. In an attempt to obtain a low rejection rate without antibody induction therapy, we undertook a prospective study of combined tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as primary immunosuppression for SPK transplantation. In this study, we analyzed 17 patients who received low‐dose intravenous tacrolimus as induction therapy. This was combined with oral tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids as the primary immunosuppression regimen. There was a significant reduction of empirically and biopsy‐proven rejection with an incidence of 23 % (4 patients). Leukopenia, gastroparesis, and gastrointestinal side‐effects were the cause of discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil, or low tacrolimus trough level in those patients who developed rejection. All rejection episodes were easy to treat, and none of them required antibody therapy. The combination of tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil without antibody induction therapy is effective in preventing early acute rejection. This combination is safe and effective as an alternative immunosuppressive regimen after SPK transplantation.     

Review of immunosuppressive usage in pancreas transplantation

Throughout 1997, nearly 10 000 pancreas transplants have been performed worldwide, with 88% being simultaneous kidney transplants (SKPT). The current 1 yr patient survival rate exceeds 90% and pancreas graft survival (complete insulin independence) rate exceeds 80% for SKPT, 70% for sequential pancreas after kidney transplant (PAKT), and 65% for pancreas transplant alone (PTA). According to registry data, rejection accounts for 32% of graft failures in the first year after pancreas transplantation. However, improvements are expected to continue with the evolution of treatment protocols. Most pancreas transplant centers employ quadruple drug immunosuppression with anti-lymphocyte induction with either a monoclonal or polyclonal antibody agent. In recent years, there has been an overall decline in the use of antibody induction therapy from 90% during the period 1987–1993 to 83% of pancreas transplants performed during 1994–1997. Maintenance immunosuppression is triple therapy consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), corticosteroids, and an anti-metabolite (AZA or MMF). Prior to 1995, nearly all pancreas transplant recipients were managed with Sandimmune. In the last 2 yr, tacrolimus-based therapy has been used in approximately 20% of cases and a new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral) has replaced Sandimmune in contemporary post-transplant immunosuppression. In addition, MMF is replacing AZA as part of the standard immunosuppressive regimen after pancreas transplantation. At present, a number of centers are conducting various trials with new drug combinations including either Neoral or tacrolimus in combination with steroids and MMF with or without antibody induction therapy. From 1994 to 1997, the 1 yr rates of immunologic graft loss have decreased to 2% after SKPT, 9% after PAKT, and 16% after PTA. The current array of new immunosuppressive agents are providing more effective control of rejection and permitting solitary pancreas transplantation to become an accepted treatment option in diabetic patients without advanced complications. The apparent potency of new drug combinations has also resulted in a resurgence of interest in steroid withdrawal. Immunosuppressive strategies will continue to evolve in order to achieve effective control of rejection while minimizing injury to the allograft and risk to the patient. In addition, new regimens must not only address the issue of specific drug toxicities but also long-term economic, metabolic, and quality of life outcomes. Pancreas transplantation will remain an important alternative in the treatment of diabetic patients until other strategies are developed that can provide equal glycemic control with less immunosuppression and overall morbidity.     

Prognostic risk factors for graft failure following pancreas transplantation: results of multivariate analysis of data from the International Pancreas Transplant Registry

Abstract. A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for graft failure was performed on patients in the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. The analysis was restricted to the period January 1978 to June 1987 and included 764 patients. All patients had at least 1 year of follow-up. The following variables were studied: transplant year, continent (N. America, Europe, others), type of donor (cadaver, living related mismatched, living related HLA-identical), donor mismatch at the HLA A, B loci, donor mismatch at the DR loci, preservation time, kidney association (pancreas transplant alone, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant, pancreas after kidney transplant), whole versus segmental pancreatic transplant, graft duct management technique (polymer injection, enteric drainage, stomach drainage, bladder drainage), and immunosuppression. By stepwise, logistic regression analysis, we found that the following factors were predictive for 1-year graft function: donor mismatch at the DR loci ( P = 0. 0003), kidney association ( P < 0. 0001), type of donor ( P = 0. 04), and immunosuppression ( P = 0. 0002). For donor mismatch at the DR loci, we found an odds ratio for success of 2. 2 for 0 versus 2 mismatches. The odds for success were 2. 9 for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant versus pancreas transplant alone. The best results-79% 1-year graft survival-were obtained for the combination of 0 mismatches at the DR loci, pancreas after kidney transplant, living related HLA-identical donor, and the immunosuppressive regimen consisting of cyclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisone. Patients receiving a pancreas transplant alone with 0 mismatches at the DR loci, living related HLA-identical donor, and triple immunosuppressive regimen had a predicted 1-year graft survival of 71%.     

他克莫司在胰、肾同期联合移植中的应用体会

目的回顾性总结他克莫司（FK506）在胰、肾同期联合移植（SPK）中的应用经验。方法37例SPK受者，术后早期采用抗淋巴细胞球蛋白（最初3例）或抗白细胞介素2受体单克隆抗体（34例）诱导治疗，采用FK506、霉酚酸酯（MMF）和皮质激素维持治疗。FK506于术后第3～4天开始口服，起始剂量为0．05～0．08mg·kg^-1·d^-1，3～5d后根据血药浓度调整用量，血FK506的浓度谷值，术后1个月内维持在10～12μg／L，2～3个月为6～10μg／L，3个月后为4～8μg／L。结果37例术后均停用胰岛素，仅1例（2．7％，1／37）术后6个月死于急性心肌梗死，受者、移植胰和移植肾1年存活率均为97％。空腹血糖恢复正常的时间为（13．4±8．9）d。28例1型糖尿病患者术后空腹血糖恢复正常的时间为（9．7±3．2）d，9例2型糖尿病患者术后空腹血糖恢复正常的时间显著延长，为（23．0±11．7）d。1年内急性排斥反应发生率为13．5％（5／37），其中4例为单纯移植肾排斥反应，1例同时累及移植胰腺和肾脏；2例经激素冲击治疗后逆转，1例经激素和抗淋巴细胞球蛋白治疗逆转，另2例经激素冲击治疗后，血肌酐一度下降，但2～3个月后因再次发生排斥反应，血肌酐逐渐上升，恢复血液透析，但移植胰功能良好，其后行再次肾移植。结论以FK506为基础的免疫抑制能安全、有效地预防SPK后的排斥反应。     

Prognostic risk factors for graft failure following pancreas transplantation: results of multivariate analysis of data from the International Pancreas Transplant Registry

A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for graft failure was performed on patients in the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. The analysis was restricted to the period January 1978 to June 1987 and included 764 patients. All patients had at least 1 year of follow-up. The following variables were studied: transplant year, continent (N. America, Europe, others), type of donor (cadaver, living related mismatched, living related HLA-identical), donormmismatch at the HLA A, B loci, donor mismatch at the DR loci, preservation time, kidney association (pancreas transplant alone, simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant, pancreas after kidney transplant), whole versus segmental pancreatic transplant, graft duct management technique (polymer injection, enteric drainage, stomach drainage, bladder drainage), and immunosuppression. By stepwise, logistic regression analysis, we found that the following factors were predictive for 1-year graft function: donor mismatch at the DR loci (P=0.0003), kidney association (P<0.0001), type of donor (P=0.04), and immunosuppression (P=0.0002). For donor mismatch at the DR loci, we found an odds ratio for success of 2.2 for 0 versus 2 mismatches. The odds for success were 2.9 for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant versus pancreas transplant alone. The best results-79% 1-year graft survival-were obtained for the combination of 0 mismatches at the DR loci, pancreas after kidney transplant, living related HLA-identical donor, and the immunosuppressive regimen consisting of cyclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisone. Patients receiving a pancreas transplant alone with 0 mismatches at the DR loci, living related HLA-identical donor, and triple immunosuppressive regimen had a predicted 1-year graft survival of 71%.     

The role of early baseline computed tomography in the interpretation of morphological changes after kidney-pancreas transplantation

In a prospective study, 17 early baseline computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained 2 or 3 days after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Morphological changes and their relevance to the early detection of graft rejection and complications were evaluated. The pancreatic grafts were enlarged and showed signs of mild pancreatitis. Serial scans obtained during the first renal graft rejection episode were compared with the baseline CT scans (n=7). They showed a significant increase in pancreatic graft size in the case of biopsy-proven severe renal graft rejection (P=0.008). Normally functioning pancreatic allografts showed a 15%–40% decrease in size 1–6 months after transplantation. We conclude that the morphological changes observed early after transplantation are compatible with mild pancreatitis, which may contribute to the development of pancreatic graft thrombosis. There is an increase in the number of morphological changes during severe rejection, yet enlarged pancreatic grafts appear to recover from transplantation-related damage and regain their normal size without signs of atrophy.     

The linear cutting stapler for enteric anastomosis: a new technique in pancreas transplantation

The drainage of pancreatic exocrine secretions following pancreas transplantation is an evolving area of surgical practice. We describe a new technique applying a 55 mm Linear Cutting Stapler (LCS) to create the duodenoenterostomy for enteric drainage of the pancreas transplant. Twenty simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantations performed between April 2005 and March 2006 were reviewed. Using a prospective database and chart review, complications and outcome related to the new technique of exocrine drainage were described. During this 12 month period, 19 of 20 consecutive simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantations have been performed using the linear cutting stapler techinque. No complications relating to the enteric anastomosis have been demonstrated. In our initial experience, use of the LCS is both safe and easy to perform.     

The role of belataceptin transplantation: results and implications of clinical trials in the context of other new biological immunosuppressant agents

Although conventional immunosuppressive agents such as calcineurin inhibitors, have substantially reduced the risk of acute rejection, they have had less impact on the long‐term survival. This is likely to be related to the adverse effects of such agents in terms of impaired renal function, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. These pitfalls of the currently available agents stimulated the research for biologic agents. Several biologic agents are now in development and hold promise for improved long‐term outcomes in renal transplant recipients, particularly in those who receive sub‐optimal organs. This article gives an overview of these new biological agents with particular emphasis on belatacept and their possible impact on short‐ and long‐term outcomes, notably on marginal organs.