Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block

Background and purpose

Pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually severe, and epidural analgesia or femoral nerve block has been considered to be an effective pain treatment. Recently, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) has become increasingly popular but the outcome of this method regarding the analgesic effect has not been fully evaluated. We compared local infiltration analgesia and femoral block with regard to analgesia and morphine demand during the first 24 h after TKA.

Methods

40 patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive femoral nerve block (group F) or peri- and intraarticular infiltration analgesia (group LIA) with a mixture containing ropivacaine, ketorolac, and epinephrine. All patients had access to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine postoperatively. Pain intensity at rest and upon movement was assessed on a numeric rating scale (0–10) on an hourly basis over 24 h if the patients were awake.

Results

The average pain at rest was marginally lower with LIA (1.6) than with femoral block (2.2). Total morphine consumption per kg was similar between the 2 groups. Ancillary analysis revealed that 1 of 20 patients in the LIA group reported a pain intensity of > 7 upon movement, as compared to 7 out of 19 in the femoral block group (p = 0.04).

Interpretation

Both LIA and femoral block provide good analgesia after TKA. LIA may be considered to be superior to femoral block since it is cheaper and easier to perform.Pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually severe and difficult to manage, and insufficient pain relief may delay recovery. The most effective pain treatment has traditionally been epidural analgesia or femoral nerve block (Singelyn et al. 1998, Ganapathy et al. 1999, Chelly et al. 2001, Davies et al. 2004, Ilfeld et al. 2006) in combination with opioid analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase (cox) inhibitors). Each of these methods has its specific side effects. Urinary retention and muscular weakness are often reported after epidural analgesia. Unpleasant numbness of a large part of the lower extremity is common after femoral block. Opioid analgesics often cause sedation, nausea and vomiting, and also urinary retention. Non-selective cox inhibitors may cause gastrointestinal bleeding, renal complications, and epidural hematoma, especially in combination with anti-thrombotic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (Afzal et al. 2006).An alternative method for postoperative pain relief after TKA, which has attracted growing interest in recent years, is multimodal wound infiltration analgesic technique consisting of peri- and intraarticular infiltration of local anesthetics and NSAID in the knee (LIA) (Andersen et al. 2008a, b, Kerr and Kohan 2008). This technique appears to offer several advantages over traditional methods, since the analgesia affects only the surgical area with limited interference of the muscle strength. Thus, easier rehabilitation of the operated extremity and earlier discharge from the hospital can be expected (Reilly et al. 2005, Essving et al. 2009). Furthermore, recent studies have shown that the LIA technique reduces the requirement for postoperative analgesia with opioids (Tanaka et al. 2001, Busch et al. 2006, Vendittoli et al. 2006).Only a few investigators have randomly compared LIA with other methods with proven analgesic effect, such as femoral block or epidural analgesia (Parvataneni et al. 2007, Toftdahl et al 2007). Parvatanemi and collaborators (2007) have shown that a combination of a femoral block and local administration of bupivacaine, morphine, and epinephrine results in better pain relief and patient satisfaction than femoral block. Toftdahl and collaborators (2007) presented data suggesting that LIA with ropivacaine, ketorolac, and epinephrine results in faster postoperative activation, as indicated by being better able to walk more than 3 m on the first postoperative day as compared to femoral block. A retrospective comparison (DeWeese et al. 2001) indicated that epidural anesthesia with fentanyl and bupivacaine resulted in better pain relief and less use of other analgesics than did continuous infiltration of the knee with bupivacaine.Femoral block is known to be an effective pain treatment after TKA (Szczukowski et al. 2004, Navas et al. 2005, Duarte et al. 2006). We compared the LIA technique with femoral block regarding efficacy of pain management at rest and upon movement after TKA. We also investigated whether LIA reduced the demand for intravenous morphine, administered via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump during the first 24 h postoperatively.     

Role of preoperative pain,muscle function,and activity level in discharge readiness after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty

Methods Before surgery, hip pain (THA) or knee pain (TKA), lower-extremity muscle power, functional performance, and physical activity were assessed in a sample of 150 patients and used as independent variables to predict the outcome (dependent variable)—readiness for hospital discharge —for each type of surgery. Discharge readiness was assessed twice daily by blinded assessors.Results Median discharge readiness and actual length of stay until discharge were both 2 days. Univariate linear regression followed by multiple linear regression revealed that age was the only independent predictor of discharge readiness in THA and TKA, but the standardized coefficients were small (≤ 0.03).Interpretation These results support the idea that fast-track THA and TKA with a length of stay of about 2–4 days can be achieved for most patients independently of preoperative functional characteristics.Over the last decade, length of stay (LOS) with discharge to home after primary THA and TKA has declined from about 5–10 days to about 2–4 days in selected series and larger nationwide series (Malviya et al. 2011, Raphael et al. 2011, Husted et al. 2012, Kehlet 2013, Hartog et al. 2013, Jørgensen and Kehlet 2013). However, there is a continuing debate about whether selected patients only or all patients should be scheduled for “fast-track” THA and TKA in relation to psychosocial factors and preoperative pain and functional status (Schneider et al. 2009, Hollowell et al. 2010, Macdonald et al. 2010, Antrobus and Bryson 2011, Jørgensen and Kehlet 2013), or whether organizational or pathophysiological factors in relation to the surgical trauma may determine the length of stay (Husted et al. 2011, Husted 2012).We studied the role of THA and TKA patients’ preoperative pain and functional characteristics in discharge from 2 orthopedic departments with well-established fast-track recovery regimens (Husted et al. 2010).     

Why still in hospital after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty?

Background and purpose

Length of stay (LOS) following total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) has been reduced to about 3 days in fast-track setups with functional discharge criteria. Earlier studies have identified patient characteristics predicting LOS, but little is known about specific reasons for being hospitalized following fast-track THA and TKA.

Patients and methods

To determine clinical and logistical factors that keep patients in hospital for the first postoperative 24–72 hours, we performed a cohort study of consecutive, unselected patients undergoing unilateral primary THA (n = 98) or TKA (n = 109). Median length of stay was 2 days. Patients were operated with spinal anesthesia and received multimodal analgesia with paracetamol, a COX-2 inhibitor, and gabapentin—with opioid only on request. Fulfillment of functional discharge criteria was assessed twice daily and specified reasons for not allowing discharge were registered.

Results

Pain, dizziness, and general weakness were the main clinical reasons for being hospitalized at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively while nausea, vomiting, confusion, and sedation delayed discharge to a minimal extent. Waiting for blood transfusion (when needed), for start of physiotherapy, and for postoperative radiographic examination delayed discharge in one fifth of the patients.

Interpretation

Future efforts to enhance recovery and reduce length of stay after THA and TKA should focus on analgesia, prevention of orthostatism, and rapid recovery of muscle function.Total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) are frequent operations with an average length of stay (LOS) of about 6–12 days in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Denmark (Husted et al. 2006, Bundesauswertung 2009, NHS 2010).During the last decade, however, there has been increased interest in optimal multimodal perioperative care to enhance recovery (the fast-track methodology). Improvement of analgesia; reduction of surgical stress responses and organ dysfunctions including nausea, vomiting, and ileus; early mobilization; and oral nutrition have been of particular interest (Kehlet 2008, Kehlet and Wilmore 2008). These principles have also been applied to THA and TKA, resulting in improvements in pain treatment with multimodal opioid-sparing regimens including a local anesthetic infiltration technique (LIA) or peripheral nerve blocks to facilitate early mobilization (Ilfeld et al. 2006a, b, 2010a, Andersen et al. 2008, Kerr and Kohan 2008), and allowing functional rehabilitation to be initiated a few hours postoperatively (Holm et al. 2010)—ultimately leading to a reduction in LOS (Husted et al. 2008, Barbieri et al. 2009, Husted et al. 2010a, b). Using these evidence-based regimens combined with an improved logistical setup, LOS is reduced to about 2–4 days (Kerr and Kohan 2008, Husted et al. 2010 a,b,c, Lunn et al. 2011).Having well-defined functional discharge criteria is imperative in order to ensure a safe discharge—and it is mandatory if meaningful comparison of LOS is done following alterations in the track (Husted et al. 2008). In the same fast-track setting, an earlier study focused on patient characteristics predicting LOS (Husted et al. 2008). However, little is known about the specific reasons for why patients are hospitalized during the first 1–3 days after THA or TKA; i.e. why can patients not be discharged?We therefore analyzed clinical and organizational factors responsible for being hospitalized in a well-defined prospective setup in a fast-track unit. This unit had previously documented LOS of about 2–3 days (Andersen et al. 2008, Holm et al. 2010, Husted et al. 2010b, c, Lunn et al. 2011).     

High-volume infiltration analgesia in bilateral hip arthroplasty. A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Background and purpose

High-volume infiltration analgesia may be effective in postoperative pain management after hip arthroplasty but methodological problems prevent exact interpretation of previous studies.

Methods

In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 12 patients undergoing bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a fast-track setting, saline or high-volume (170 mL) ropivacaine (0.2%) with epinephrine (1:100,000) was administered to the wound intraoperatively along with supplementary postoperative injections via an intraarticular epidural catheter. Oral analgesia was instituted preoperatively with a multimodal regimen (gabapentin, celecoxib, and acetaminophen). Pain was assessed repeatedly for 48 hours postoperatively, at rest and with 45° hip flexion.

Results

Pain scores were low and similar between ropivacaine and saline administration. Median hospital stay was 4 (range 2–7) days.

Interpretation

Intraoperative high-volume infiltration with 0.2% ropivacaine with repeated intraarticular injections postoperatively may not give a clinically relevant analgesic effect in THA when combined with a multimodal oral analgesic regimen with gabapentin, celecoxib, and acetaminophen.Continuous epidural analgesia (Choi et al. 2003) or continuous or single-shot peripheral nerve blocks (Boezaart 2006, Ilfeld et al. 2008) may provide sufficient analgesia after total hip arthroplasty (THA), but both techniques are associated with potential motor blockade, thereby hindering early rehabilitation (Choi et al 2003, Boezaart 2006, Ilfeld et al. 2008).Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) (Röstlund and Kehlet 2007, Kerr and Kohan 2008, Otte et al. 2008) with intraoperative infiltration of local anesthetic in the surgical wound and subsequent supplementary postoperative intraarticular or wound injections has been reported to be effective in knee arthroplasty (Andersen et al. 2008). However, for THA only limited and inconclusive data are available from placebo-controlled and randomized trials (Bianconi et al. 2003, Andersen et al. 2007 a, b, Busch et al. 2010) and from non-randomized cohort studies (Kerr and Kohan 2008, Otte et al. 2008). We therefore decided to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of LIA in a placebo-controlled, randomized and double-blind trial in fast-track bilateral hip arthroplasty with administration of either ropivacaine or saline to the wound, thereby limiting the large inter-individual pain response to THA. This design has proven valid in assessing the analgesic value of LIA in TKA (Andersen et al. 2008). The primary endpoint was pain on flexion of the hip joint 8 hours postoperatively.     

Fast-track revision knee arthroplasty. A feasibility study

Background and purpose

Fast-track surgery has reduced the length of hospital stay (LOS), morbidity, and convalescence in primary hip and knee arthroplasty (TKA). We assessed whether patients undergoing revision TKA for non-septic indications might also benefit from fast-track surgery.

Methods

29 patients were operated with 30 revision arthroplasties. Median age was 67 (34–84) years. All patients followed a standardized fast-track set-up designed for primary TKA. We determined the outcome regarding LOS, morbidity, mortality, and satisfaction.

Results

Median LOS was 2 (1–4) days excluding 1 patient, who was transferred to another hospital for logistical reasons (10 days). None of the patients died within 3 months, and 3 patients were re-admitted (2 for suspicion of DVT, which was not found, and 1 for joint mobilization). Patient satisfaction was high.

Interpretation

Patients undergoing revision TKA for non-septic reasons may be included in fast-track protocols. Outcome appears to be similar to that of primary TKA regarding LOS, morbidity, and satisfaction. Our findings call for larger confirmatory studies and studies involving other indications (revision THA, 1-stage septic revisions).For more than a decade, favorable outcomes following fast-track protocols rather than more conventional hospital stays have been reported from numerous studies on primary THA and TKA. In the last few years, outcomes have been further improved, mainly due to improved multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia and early mobilization, allowing patients to fulfill functional discharge criteria within 2–3 days (Husted et al. 2008, 2010 a,b,c,d, Larsen et al. 2008 a,b,c, 2009, Andersen et al. 2009, Barbieri et al. 2009, Rotter et al. 2010). The addition of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) has improved early analgesia and facilitated early recovery, allowing patients to ambulate with full weight bearing within 2–3 hours of surgery (Andersen et al. 2008 a,b, 2009, Holm et al. 2010).So far, however, no one has reported the potential benefits of the fast-track methodology (including multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, perioperative LIA, and early mobilization) for revision TKA, with its more extensive surgical trauma leading to a corresponding increase in the surgical stress responses. We therefore investigated the feasibility of our well-documented fast-track primary TKA program on a consecutive cohort of revision TKA patients.     

Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty

Background and purpose

The choice of either all-polyethylene (AP) tibial components or metal-backed (MB) tibial components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. We therefore performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials that have evaluated MB and AP tibial components in primary TKA.

Methods

The search strategy included a computerized literature search (Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and a manual search of major orthopedic journals. A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized or quasi-randomized trials that compared the performance of tibial components in primary TKA was performed using a fixed or random effects model. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using Detsky quality scale.

Results

9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000 and 2009 met the inclusion quality standards for the systematic review. The mean standardized Detsky score was 14 (SD 3). We found that the frequency of radiolucent lines in the MB group was significantly higher than that in the AP group. There were no statistically significant differences between the MB and AP tibial components regarding component positioning, knee score, knee range of motion, quality of life, and postoperative complications.

Interpretation

Based on evidence obtained from this study, the AP tibial component was comparable with or better than the MB tibial component in TKA. However, high-quality RCTs are required to validate the results.The design of the tibial component is an important factor for implant failure in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (Pagnano et al. 1999, Forster 2003, Gioe et al. 2007b, Willie et al. 2008, Garcia et al. 2009, KAT Trial Group 2009). The metal-backed (MB) design of tibial component has become predominant in TKA because it is thought to perform better than the all-polyethylene (AP) design (Muller et al. 2006, Gioe et al. 2006, 2007a,b). In theory, the MB tibial component reduces bending strains in the stem, reduces compressive stresses in the cement and cancellous bone beneath the baseplate (especially during asymmetric loading), and distributes load more evenly across the interface (Bartel et al. 1982, 1985, Taylor et al. 1998). However, critics of the MB tibial component claim that there are expensive implant costs, reduced polyethylene thickness with the same amount of bone resection, backside wear, and increased tensile stresses at the interface during eccentric loading (Bartel et al. 1982, 1985, Pomeroy et al. 2000, Rodriguez et al. 2001, Li et al. 2002, Muller et al. 2006, Blumenfeld and Scott 2010, Gioe and Maheshwari 2010).In the past decade, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed to assess the effectiveness of the MB tibial component (Adalberth et al. 2000, 2001, Gioe and Bowman 2000, Norgren et al. 2004, Hyldahl et al. 2005a, b, Muller et al. 2006, Gioe et al. 2007, Bettinson et al. 2009, KAT Trial Group 2009). However, data have not been formally and systematically analyzed using quantitative methods in order to determine whether the MB tibial component is indeed optimal for patients in TKA. In this study, we wanted (1) to determine the scientific quality of published RCTs comparing the AP and MB tibial components in TKA using Detsky score (Detsky et al. 1992) and (2) to conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review of all published RCTs that have compared the effects of AP and MB tibial components on the radiographic and clinical outcomes of TKA.     

Intraarticular vs. extraarticular ropivacaine infusion following high-dose local infiltration analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized double-blind study

Background and purpose

Ropivacaine infusion following high-volume local infiltration analgesia has been shown to be effective after total knee arthroplasty, but the optimum site of administration of ropivacaine has not been evaluated. We compared the effects of intraarticular and extraarticular adminstration of the local anesthetic for postoperative supplementation of high-volume local infiltration analgesia.

Patients and methods

In this double-blind study, 36 rheumatic patients aged 51–78 years with physical status ASA 2–3 who were scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized into 2 groups. All patients received wound infiltration at the end of surgery with 300 mg ropivacaine, 30 mg ketorolac, and 0.5 mg epinephrine (total volume 156 mL). A tunneled catheter was randomly placed either extraarticularly or intraarticularly. Continuous infusion of ropivacain (0.5%, 2 mL/h) was started immediately and was maintained during the next 48 h. Pain intensity at rest, on movement, and with mobilization was estimated by the patients and the physiotherapist; rescue morphine consumption was recorded.

Results

As estimated by the patients, ropivacaine administered intraarticularly did not improve analgesia relative to extraarticular infusion, but improved the first mobilization. The incidence of high intensity of pain (VAS 7–10) was less in the group with intraarticular infusion. Analgesic requirements were similar in the 2 groups (47 mg and 49 mg morphine). No complications of postoperative wound healing were seen and there were no toxic side effects.

Interpretation

Continuous infusion of ropivacaine intraarticulary did not improve postoperative analgesia at rest relative to extraarticular administration, but it appeared to reduce the incidence of high pain intensity during first exercises, and could therefore be expected to improve mobilization up to 24 h after total knee arthroplasty.Pain after total knee arthroplasty is severe in two-thirds of patients (Bonica 1984, Beattie et al. 1997). The pain may be a result of trauma to the bone or soft tissues or a result of hyperperfusion after tourniquet release (Estebe et al. 1995). The optimal form of pain relief is one that is applied preoperatively, perioperatively, and postoperatively to avoid the establishment of pain hypersensitivity (Badner et al. 1996). Good pain relief allows effective postoperative rehabilitation (Shoji et al. 1990). In contrast to epidural analgesia and femoral block, an alternative method to achieve good postoperative pain relief is local infiltration combined with single-shot injection or continuous infusion of local anesthetics into the surgical site. Local anesthetic infiltration is helpful in the management of postoperative pain after several orthopedic procedures (De Andres et al. 1993). The use of intraarticular analgesia to limit postoperative pain following knee arthroplasty has been investigated, with different results (Smith et al. 1991, Allen et al. 1993, Osborne and Keene 1993, Badner et al. 1996, Mauerhan et al. 1997, Ritter et al. 1999).A local infiltration analgesia (LIA) technique was developed by Kerr and Kohan in Sydney, Australia (Rostlund and Kehlet 2007, Kerr and Kohan 2008). With this technique, the long-acting local anesthetic ropivacaine, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (ketorolac), and epinephrine are infiltrated periarticulary during surgery. An alternative technique that might have widespread applicability is the insertion of catheters to allow continuous infusion of local anesthetics into the surgical wound at the end of the procedure. There is a need for detailed systematic studies to evaluate the optimal site of administration of local anaesthetics. In this randomized, double-blind study, we compared the analgesic effects of continuous infusion of local anesthetics either intraarticulary or extraarticulary after TKA using the LIA technique.     

A randomized, controlled trial comparing local infiltration analgesia with epidural infusion for total knee arthroplasty

Background

There have been few studies describing wound infiltration with additional intraarticular administration of multimodal analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, we assessed the efficacy of wound infiltration combined with intraarticular regional analgesia with epidural infusion on analgesic requirements and postoperative pain after TKA.

Methods

40 consecutive patients undergoing elective, primary TKA were randomized into 2 groups to receive either (1) intraoperative wound infiltration with 150 mL ropivacaine (2 mg/mL), 1 mL ketorolac (30 mg/mL), and 0.5 mL epinephrine (1 mg/mL) (total volume 152 mL) combined with intraarticular infusion (4 mL/h) of 190 mL ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) plus 2 mL ketorolac (30 mg/mL) (group A), or (2) epidural infusion (4 mL/h) of 192 mL ropivacaine (2 mg/mL) combined with 6 intravenous administrations of 0.5 mL ketorolac (30 mg/mL) for 48 h postoperatively (group E). For rescue analgesia, intravenous patient-controlled-analgesia (PCA) morphine was used.Morphine consumption, intensity of knee pain (0–100 mm visual analog scale), and side effects were recorded. Length of stay and corrected length of stay were also recorded (the day-patients fulfilled discharge criteria).

Results

The median cumulated morphine consumption, pain scores at rest, and pain scores during mobilization were reduced in group A compared to group E. Corrected length of stay was reduced by 25% in group A compared to group E.

Interpretation

Peri- and intraarticular analgesia with multimodal drugs provided superior pain relief and reduced morphine consumption compared with continuous epidural infusion with ropivacaine combined with intravenous ketorolac after TKA.Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) usually results in severe postoperative pain. Continuous epidural infusion with a local anesthetic is a standard regime for postoperative analgesia after TKA. Epidural analgesia and also peripheral nerve block analgesia have been shown to reduce opioid consumption compared with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Even though both modalities reduce the occurrence of the well-known side effects of opioid drugs, they involve extra equipment and are associated with substantial side effects (Choi et al. 2003, Davies et al. 2004, Boezaart 2006). Wound infiltration with multimodal analgesia has been a controversial issue for many years (Dahl et al. 1994). Different modes of perioperative analgesia either without or combined with intraarticular infusion or bolus injection(s) for both TKA and total hip arthroplasty have been described (Bianconi et al. 2003, Rasmussen et al. 2004, Reilly et al. 2005, Andersen et al. 2007a, b). Only a few studies have described high-volume peri- and intraarticular analgesia for TKA (Busch et al. 2006, Vendittoli et al. 2006, Toftdahl et al. 2007). The hypothesis in our trial was that wound infiltration and intraarticular infusion of ropivacaine and ketorolac would reduce opioid consumption during the active treatment period (0–48 h postoperatively) after TKA compared to epidural infusion of ropivacaine and intravenous ketorolac. Primary outcome was 48-h opioid use. Secondary outcomes included pain at rest and during mobilization, side effects, length of hospital stay (LOS), and corrected length of stay (the day-patients fulfilled discharge criteria).     

What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?: An overview of the literature

Background

Surgeon-dependent factors such as optimal implant alignment are thought to play a significant role in outcome following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Exact definitions and references for optimal alignment are, however, still being debated. This overview of the literature describes different definitions of component alignment following primary TKA for (1) tibiofemoral alignment in the AP plane, (2) tibial and femoral component placement in the AP plane, (3) tibial and femoral component placement in the sagittal plane, and (4) rotational alignment of tibial and femoral components and their role in outcome and implant survival.

Methods

We performed a literature search for original and review articles on implant positioning following primary TKA. Definitions for coronal, sagittal, and rotational placement of femoral and tibial components were summarized and the influence of positioning on survival and functional outcome was considered.

Results

Many definitions exist when evaluating placement of femoral and tibial components. Implant alignment plays a role in both survival and functional outcome following primary TKA, as component malalignment can lead to increased failure rates, maltracking, and knee pain.

Interpretation

Based on currently available evidence, surgeons should aim for optimal alignment of tibial and femoral components when performing TKA.Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequently performed orthopedic procedures, with an estimated 700,000 primary TKAs performed annually in the USA alone (National Hospital Discharge Survey 2010). While survival of primary TKAs is excellent, as most registries report 10-year survival of close to 95% for most implants (Graves et al. 2013, NJR 2013), recent studies have indicated that patient satisfaction is substantially worse. Up to 20% of the patients are not satisfied with the outcome as assessed 1 year postoperatively (Bourne et al. 2010, Klit et al. 2014) and a recent review found that 10–34% of patients had pain 3 months to 5 years after TKA (Beswick et al. 2012). Although patient-related factors (such as age, preoperative OKS and EQ5D, comorbidities, general health, depression, anxiety, and ASA) have been found to influence patient-reported outcome the most, surgical factors such as implant brand, hospital type (Baker et al. 2012), and implant alignment are also important (Choong et al. 2009, Longstaff et al. 2009).Implant malalignment following primary TKA has been reported to be the primary reason for revision in 7% of revised TKAs (Schroer et al. 2013) and it has been linked to both decreased implant survival (Ritter et al. 2011) and inferior patient-reported outcomes (Choong et al. 2009, Longstaff et al. 2009). However, optimal alignment still remains a matter of controversy, as several recent reports have found little or no correlation between postoperative tibiofemoral malalignment in the coronal plane and revision rates (Morgan et al. 2008, Parratte et al. 2010, Bonner et al. 2011). The emergence of computer navigation (Fu et al. 2012) and patient-specific cutting blocks (Lachiewicz and Henderson 2013)—with the proposed benefits of improved component positioning and fewer outliers—have further fueled this debate, as benefits in survival and patient related outcome are not apparent. Also, kinematic alignment (as opposed to mechanical alignment) in TKA has been debated in recent years as inherently, it does not adhere to traditional thinking concerning implant positioning and it is intended to improve postoperative outcome (Howell et al. 2013a).We investigated whether the literature supports definitions of optimal alignment following primary TKA surgery and whether a correlation between malalignment and inferior outcome could be identified. The following parameters were investigated separately: (1) tibiofemoral alignment in the AP plane; (2) tibial and femoral component placement in the AP plane; (3) tibial and femoral component placement in the sagittal plane; and (4) rotational alignment of tibial and femoral components.     

Dissatisfied patients after total knee arthroplasty: A registry study involving 114 patients with 8–13 years of follow-up

Background and purpose

In 2003, an enquiry by the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) 2–7 years after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revealed patients who were dissatisfied with the outcome of their surgery but who had not been revised. 6 years later, we examined the dissatisfied patients in one Swedish county and a matched group of very satisfied patients.

Patients and methods

118 TKAs in 114 patients, all of whom had had their surgery between 1996 and 2001, were examined in 2009–2010. 55 patients (with 58 TKAs) had stated in 2003 that they were dissatisfied with their knees and 59 (with 60 TKAs) had stated that they were very satisfied with their knees. The patients were examined clinically and radiographically, and performed functional tests consisting of the 6-minute walk and chair-stand test. All the patients filled out a visual analog scale (VAS, 0–100 mm) regarding knee pain and also the Hospital and Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD).

Results

Mean VAS score for knee pain differed by 30 mm in favor of the very satisfied group (p < 0.001). 23 of the 55 patients in the dissatisfied group and 6 of 59 patients in the very satisfied group suffered from anxiety and/or depression (p = 0.001). Mean range of motion was 11 degrees better in the very satisfied group (p < 0.001). The groups were similar with regard to clinical examination, physical performance testing, and radiography.

Interpretation

The patients who reported poor response after TKA continued to be unhappy after 8–13 years, as demonstrated by VAS pain and HAD, despite the absence of a discernible objective reason for revision.The results of TKA are regarded as being favorable (Robertsson et al. 2000, Kane et al. 2005, Nilsdotter et al. 2009, Carr et al. 2012) with few surgical complications and a revision rate of less than 5% after 10 years (Vessely et al. 2006, Robertsson et al. 2010). Poor outcome after primary TKA, apart from the revision, is between 6% and 14% (Anderson et al. 1996, Hawker et al. 1998, Heck et al. 1998, Robertsson et al. 2000, Robertsson and Dunbar 2001, Brander et al. 2003, Noble et al. 2006, Fisher et al. 2007, Wylde et al. 2008, Kim et al. 2009, Bourne et al. 2010, Scott et al. 2010). The reason for poor outcome after TKA may be related to problems with the knee surgery itself, although it has been suggested that extra-articular causes such as hip disease, spine disorder, vascular disease, or reflex sympathetic dystrophy may contribute. Some studies have suggested that factors not primarily related to structural tissue changes, but of psychological nature instead, may be involved (Wylde et al. 2007, Rolfson et al. 2009).The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) registers primary arthroplasties performed in Sweden as well as revisions, and has been estimated to capture 97% of the surgeries performed (SKAR 2012). The SKAR sends questionnaires regarding satisfaction to patients who were operated on during certain time periods (Robertsson et al. 2000, and Dunbar 2001). We used the SKAR to identify patients who had not undergone revision surgery and who were dissatisfied with their outcome 2–7 years after TKA surgery. As a reference we chose an age-, sex-, date-of-surgery-, and hospital-matched control group of highly satisfied patients who were operated during the same period. Our aim was to assess the differences between these 2 patient groups.     

More accurate component alignment in navigated total knee arthroplasty has no clinical benefit at 5-year follow-up

Background and purpose

Computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty is somewhat controversial. We have previously shown that femoral component positioning is more accurate with computed navigation than with conventional implantation techniques, but the clinical impact of this is unknown. We now report the 5-year outcome of our previously reported 2-year outcome study.

Methods

78 of initially 84 patients (80 of 86 knees) were clinically and radiographically reassessed 5 (5.1–5.9) years after conventional, image-based, and image-free total knee arthroplasty. The methodology was identical to that used preoperatively and at 2 years, including the Knee Society score (KSS) and the functional score (FS), and AP and true lateral standard radiographs.

Results

Although a more accurate femoral component positioning in the navigated groups was obtained, clinical outcome, number of reoperations, KSS, FS, and range of motion were similar between the groups.

Interpretation

The increased costs and time for navigated techniques did not translate into better functional and subjective medium-term outcome compared to conventional techniques.Abnormal wear patterns and component loosening are mainly results of component malalignment and complications of the extensor mechanism, the most common reasons for early failure of TKA (Ritter et al. 1994, Rand et al. 2003, Vince 2003, Bathis et al. 2004). It has been suggested that a varus or valgus malalignment of more the 3° leads to faster wear and debris, followed by early failure of TKA (Ecker et al. 1987, Archibeck and White 2003, Nizard et al. 2004).Several surgical navigation systems for TKA have been introduced to optimize component positioning (Delp et al. 1998, DiGioia et al. 1998, Krackow et al. 1999). It has been shown that navigation provides a more precise component positioning and fewer outliers (Bathis et al. 2004, Nabeyama et al. 2004, Stockl et al. 2004, Victor and Hoste 2004, Anderson et al. 2005, Zumstein et al. 2006). Nevertheless, comparing computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty with conventional implantation techniques, there is no evidence in the current literature of any significant improvement in clinical outcome and in component loosening (Bathis et al. 2004, Jenny et al. 2005, Yau et al. 2005, Bonutti et al. 2008, Molfetta and Caldo 2008).In a prospective study involving 86 patients in 3 different groups (image-based navigation, image-free navigation, and conventional), we showed that femoral component positioning was more accurate with navigation than with conventional implantation techniques, but tibial positioning showed similar results (Zumstein et al. 2006).Although other medium-term data on navigated total knee arthroplasty have already been reported (Ishida et al. 2011, Schmitt et al. 2011), there has been no prospective cohort series with reporting of the clinical, functional, and radiographic outcome with all 3 techniques: image-based navigated, image-free navigated, or conventional TKA. We therefore determined the clinical, functional, and radiographic 5-year results after each of the 3 techniques.     

Similar TKA designs with differences in clinical outcome: a randomized, controlled trial of 77 knees with a mean follow-up of 6 years

Background and purpose

To try to improve the outcome of our TKAs, we started to use the CKS prosthesis. However, in a retrospective analysis this design tended to give worse results. We therefore conducted a randomized, controlled trial comparing this CKS prosthesis and our standard PFC prosthesis. Because many randomized studies between different TKA concepts generally fail to show superiority of a particular design, we hypothesized that these seemingly similar designs would not lead to any difference in clinical outcome.

Patients and methods

82 patients (90 knees) were randomly allocated to one or other prosthesis, and 39 CKS prostheses and 38 PFC prostheses could be followed for mean 5.6 years. No patients were lost to follow-up. At each follow-up, patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically, and the KSS, WOMAC, VAS patient satisfaction scores and VAS for pain were recorded.

Results

With total Knee Society score (KSS) as primary endpoint, there was a difference in favor of the PFC group at final follow-up (p = 0.04). Whereas there was one revision in the PFC group, there were 6 revisions in the CKS group (p = 0.1). The survival analysis with any reoperation as endpoint showed better survival in the PFC group (97% (95% CI: 92–100) for the PFC group vs. 79% (95% CI: 66–92) for the CKS group) (p = 0.02).

Interpretation

Our hypothesis that there would be no difference in clinical outcome was rejected in this study. The PFC system showed excellent results that were comparable to those in previous reports. The CKS design had differences that had considerable negative consequences clinically. The relatively poor results have discouraged us from using this design.Although current results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are relatively good, there is still room for improvement. There is constant research and development, with a view to obtaining longer survival rates (Rand et al. 2003, Julin et al. 2010), a better range of motion (high-flex TKA) (McCalden et al. 2009, Choi et al. 2010, Mehin et al. 2010), or a more anatomical reconstruction of the joint—such as posterior and anterior cruciate ligament retaining designs (Ries 2007, Pritchett 2011) and gender-specific TKA (Clarke and Hentz 2008, Kim et al. 2010).We started to use the CKS prosthesis (Stratec Medical, Oberdorf, Switzerland), based on previous research at our institution showing that the natural patella groove does not have an isolated lateral orientation (Barink et al. 2006). In contrast to our standard prosthesis (PFC; DePuy/Johnson and Johnson, Warsaw, IN) with a lateral orientation of the patellar groove, the trochlea of the CKS prosthesis is deeper and has a neutral direction. However, in a retrospective analysis, after 1 year the CKS prosthesis tended to have worse Knee Society scores (KSSs) (Brokelman et al. 2004). We decided to compare the outcome thoroughly and started a randomized, controlled trial between the CKS and the PFC prostheses.Many randomized studies of TKAs with different bearings (Harrington et al. 2009, Rahman et al. 2010), cruciate-retaining or -substituting devices (Kim et al. 2009), gender-specific designs (Kim et al. 2010), and high-flex designs (McCalden et al. 2009, Choi et al. 2010, Mehin et al. 2010) generally fail to show superiority of one of the devices over the other. We therefore hypothesized that the seemingly small differences in design between the CKS and PFC system would not lead to differences in clinical outcome in our study.     

No clinical benefit of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials

Background and purpose

There is no consensus regarding the clinical relevance of gender-specific prostheses in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We summarize the current best evidence in a comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between gender-specific prostheses and standard unisex prostheses in female patients.

Methods

We used the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Science Citation Index, and Scopus databases. We included randomized controlled trials published up to January 2013 that compared gender-specific prostheses with standard unisex prostheses in female patients who underwent primary TKAs.

Results

6 trials involving 423 patients with 846 knee joints met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 designs regarding pain, range of motion (ROM), knee scores, satisfaction, preference, complications, and radiographic results. The gender-specific design (Gender Solutions; Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, Indiana) reduced the prevalence of overhang. However, it had less overall coverage of the femoral condyles compared to the unisex group. In fact, the femoral prosthesis in the standard unisex group matched better than that in the gender-specific group.

Interpretation

Gender-specific prostheses do not appear to confer any benefit in terms of clinician- and patient-reported outcomes for the female knee.Women account for almost two-thirds of knee arthroplasties (Kurtz et al. 2007). Recently, a possible effect of gender on functional outcomes and implant survivorship has been identified (Vincent et al. 2006, Ritter et al. 2008, Kamath et al. 2010, Parsley et al. 2010, O’Connor 2011). Gender differences in the anatomy of the distal femur are well documented (Conley et al. 2007, Yue et al. 2011a, b, Yan et al. 2012, Zeng et al. 2012). Women tend to have a less prominent anterior condyle (Conley et al. 2007, Fehring et al. 2009), a higher quadriceps angle (Q-angle) (Hsu et al. 1990, Woodland et al. 1992), and a reduced mediolateral to anteroposterior aspect ratio (Chin et al. 2002, Chaichankul et al. 2011). Investigators have found that standard unisex knee prostheses may not equally match the native anatomy in male and female knees (Clarke and Hentz 2008, Yan et al. 2012). A positive association between the femoral component size and the amount of overhang was observed in females, and femoral component overhang (≥ 3 mm) may result in postoperative knee pain or reduced ROM (Hitt et al. 2003, Lo et al. 2003, Mahoney et al. 2010).The concept of gender-specific knee prostheses was introduced to match these 3 anatomic differences in the female population (Conley et al. 2007). It includes a narrower mediolateral diameter for a given anteroposterior dimension, to match the female knee more closely. Additionally, the anterior flange of the prothesis was modified to include a recessed patellar sulcus and reduced anterior condylar height (to ovoid “overstuffing” during knee flexion) and a lateralized patellar sulcus (to accommodate the increased Q-angle associated with a wider pelvis).Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have failed to establish the superiority of the gender-specific prosthesis over the unisex knee prosthesis in the female knee (Kim et al. 2010a, b, Song et al. 2012a, Thomsen et al. 2012, von Roth et al. 2013). In contrast, other studies have found higher patient satisfaction and better radiographic fit in the gender-specific TKAs than in the standard unisex TKAs (Clarke and Hentz 2008, Parratte et al. 2011, Yue et al. 2014). We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical and radiographic results of TKA in female patients receiving gender-specific prostheses or standard unisex prostheses.     

Perioperative mortality after hemiarthroplasty related to fixation method

Background and purpose

The appropriate fixation method for hemiarthroplasty of the hip as it relates to implant survivorship and patient mortality is a matter of ongoing debate. We examined the influence of fixation method on revision rate and mortality.

Methods

We analyzed approximately 25,000 hemiarthroplasty cases from the AOA National Joint Replacement Registry. Deaths at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year were compared for all patients and among subgroups based on implant type.

Results

Patients treated with cemented monoblock hemiarthroplasty had a 1.7-times higher day-1 mortality compared to uncemented monoblock components (p < 0.001). This finding was reversed by 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year after surgery (p < 0.001). Modular hemiarthroplasties did not reveal a difference in mortality between fixation methods at any time point.

Interpretation

This study shows lower (or similar) overall mortality with cemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip.The frequency of hip fractures is increasing with our ageing population, with an annual incidence of between 1.4 and 5 per 103 per year (Lonnroos et al. 2006, Icks et al. 2008, Varez-Nebreda et al. 2008). Health model projections have estimated that 6.3 million hip fractures will occur annually worldwide within the next 40 years (Cooper et al. 1992), imposing a significant economic health burden. There is a large reported perioperative mortality rate in this population, ranging from 2.4% to 8.2% at 1 month (Parvizi et al. 2001, Radcliff et al. 2008) and over 25% at 1 year (Elliott et al. 2003, Jiang et al. 2005). Furthermore, it was recently reported that the current mortality rate is higher now than 25 years ago (Vestergaard et al. 2007a). Today, it is generally accepted that displaced intracapsular fractures are best treated with arthroplasty rather than internal fixation (Keating et al. 2006, Leighton et al. 2007). In the at-risk population, however, multiple comorbidities are common and the best form of component fixation is in question.Bone cement implantation syndrome is a well-described complication of cemented hip arthroplasty. It is characterized by a systemic drop in systolic blood pressure, hypoxemia, pulmonary hypertension, cardiac dysrhythmias, and occasionally cardiac arrest and death (Rinecker 1980, Orsini et al. 1987, Parvizi et al. 1999). The prevailing theory to explain the pathophysiology of this phenomenon is embolism of fat, marrow contents, bone, and to some degree methylmethacrylate to the lung (Rinecker 1980, Elmaraghy et al. 1998, Parvizi et al. 1999, Koessler et al. 2001). An increased degree of pulmonary insult with fat microemboli has been demonstrated (mostly in randomized controlled trials) during insertion of a cemented femoral stem rather than an uncemented implant (Orsini et al. 1987, Ries et al. 1993, Christie et al. 1994, Pitto et al. 1999), presumably due to increased intramedullary femoral canal pressures in the cemented group (Kallos et al. 1974, Orsini et al. 1987). These pressures can be reduced by the use of distal venting holes in the femur during stem insertion (Engesæter et al. 1984). It has been shown previously by single-institutional review that patients undergoing cemented hip arthroplasty have a higher intraoperative mortality rate relative to uncemented arthroplasty, presumably due to a reduced incidence of fat embolism in the latter group (Parvizi et al. 1999). The increased mortality risk was also present at 30 days in the treatment of acute fractures with cemented arthroplasty, also from a single-institutional review (Parvizi et al. 2004). Although cement-related mortality is rare (Dearborn and Harris 1998, Parvizi et al. 1999, 2001, 2004, Weinrauch et al. 2006), it is a devastating complication—often reported through observational studies or literature reviews. Proponents of uncemented hip arthroplasty often cite this concern to support their reluctance to use cemented hip arthroplasty in both elective procedures and fracture management. However, many different types of studies have been unable to identify any increased mortality risk with the use of cement (Lausten and Vedel 1982 (observational), Emery et al. 1991 (RCT), Lo et al. 1994 (observational), Khan et al. 2002a,b (literature review), Parker and Gurusamy 2004 (literature review)) and others have shown a decrease in mortality at 30 days when cement is used (Foster et al. 2005).Cemented hip hemiarthroplasty appears to offer improved rate of return to baseline function, reduced postoperative pain, and superior long-term survivorship relative to uncemented arthroplasty (Khan et al. 2002a, b, Parker and Gurusamy 2004). We reasoned that failure to return to baseline function after hemiarthroplasty may be another risk factor for perioperative mortality (Hannan et al. 2001, Braithwaite et al. 2003). Lower revision rates for cemented prostheses and increased mortality at revision surgery contribute further to reducing the overall mortality risk. We evaluated the relationship between the method of fixation of hip arthroplasty and perioperative mortality using a large national joint replacement registry.     

Locking plate osteosynthesis in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus

Background and purpose

There is considerable uncertainty about the optimal treatment of displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Within the last decade, locking plate technology has been considered a breakthrough in the treatment of these complex injuries.

Methods

We systematically identified and reviewed clinical studies on the benefits and harms after osteosynthesis with locking plates in displaced 4-part fractures.

Results

We included 14 studies with 374 four-part fractures. There were 10 case series, 3 retrospective observational comparative studies, 1 prospective observational comparative study, and no randomized trials. Small studies with a high risk of bias precluded reliable estimates of functional outcome. High rates of complications (16–64%) and reoperations (11–27%) were reported.

Interpretation

The empirical foundation for the value of locking plates in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus is weak. We emphasize the need for well-conducted randomized trials and observational studies.There is considerable uncertainty about the optimal treatment of displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus (Misra et al. 2001, Handoll et al. 2003, Bhandari et al. 2004, Lanting et al. 2008). Only 2 small inconclusive randomized trials have been published (Stableforth 1984, Hoellen et al. 1997). A large number of interventions are used routinely, ranging from a non-operative approach to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and primary hemiarthroplasty (HA).In the last decade, locking plate technology has been developed and has been heralded as a breakthrough in the treatment of fractures in osteoporotic bone (Gautier and Sommer 2003, Sommer et al. 2003, Haidukewych 2004, Miranda 2007). Locking plate technique is based on the elimination of friction between the plate and cortex, and relies on stability between the subchondral bone and screws. Multiple multidirectional convergent and divergent locking screws enhance the angular stability of the osteosynthesis, possibly resulting in better postoperative function with reduced pain. Reported complications include screw cut-out, varus fracture collapse, tuberosity re-displacement, humeral head necrosis, plate impingement, and plate or screw breakage (Hall et al. 2006, Tolat et al. 2006, van Rooyen et al. 2006, Agudelo et al. 2007, Gardner et al. 2007, Khunda et al. 2007, Ring 2007, Smith et al. 2007, Voigt et al. 2007, Egol et al. 2008, Kirchhoff et al. 2008, Owsley and Gorczyca 2008, Brunner et al. 2009, Micic et al. 2009, Sudkamp et al. 2009). The balance between the benefit and harms of the intervention seems delicate.Several authors of narrative reviews and clinical series have strongly recommended fixation of displaced 4-part fractures of the humerus with locking plates (Bjorkenheim et al. 2004, Hente et al. 2004, Hessler et al. 2006, Koukakis et al. 2006, Kilic et al. 2008, Korkmaz et al. 2008, Shahid et al. 2008, Papadopoulos et al. 2009, Ricchetti et al. 2009) and producers of implants unsurprisingly strongly advocate them (aap Implantate 2010, Stryker 2010, Synthes 2010, Zimmer 2010). Despite the increasing use of locking plates (Illert et al. 2008, Ricchetti et al. 2009), we have been unable to identify systematic reviews on the benefits and harms of this new technology in displaced 4-part fractures. Thus, we systematically identified and reviewed clinical studies on the benefits and harms after osteosynthesis with locking plates in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus.     

Faster recovery without the use of a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized study of 70 patients

Background and purpose

Tourniquet application is still a common practice in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery despite being associated with several adverse effects. We evaluated the effects of tourniquet use on functional and clinical outcome and on knee range of motion (ROM).

Patients and methods

70 patients who underwent TKA were randomized into a tourniquet group (n = 35) and a non-tourniquet group (n = 35). All operations were performed by the same surgeon and follow-up was for 1 year. Primary outcomes were functional and clinical outcomes, as evaluated by KOOS and knee ROM. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative blood loss, surgical time and visibility, postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and transfusion requirements.

Results

Patients in the non-tourniquet group showed a better outcome in all KOOS subscores and better early knee ROM from surgery to week 8. No difference was detected at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Postoperative pain and analgesic consumption were less when a tourniquet was not used. Surgical time and visibility were similar between groups. Intraoperative blood loss was greater when not using a tourniquet, but no postoperative transfusions were required.

Interpretation

This study shows that TKA without the use of a tourniquet results in faster recovery in terms of better functional outcome and improved knee ROM. Furthermore, reduced pain and analgesic use were registered and no intraoperative difficulties were encountered.Tourniquets are frequently applied in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to ensure less intraoperative bleeding and create a bloodless surgical field, thereby potentially reducing surgical time, improving the quality of cementation, and ensuring long-term implant fixation (Bannister and Miles 1988, Rama et al. 2007, Smith and Hing 2010, Tsarouhas et al. 2012).There are, however disadvantages when using a tourniquet, including thigh pain, nerve palsy, ischemia, soft tissue damage, thromboembolic complications, poor wound healing, and patella maltracking (Komatsu et al. 2003, Smith and Hing 2010, Tai et al. 2011). Furthermore, recovery may be delayed due to reduced muscle strength, reduced knee ROM, and increased pain (Saunders et al. 1979). Other studies have shown increased pain and impaired ROM up to 1 year after surgery in which a tourniquet is used (Abdel-Salam and Eyres 1995, Ledin et al. 2012).Several randomized controlled trails and meta-analyses dealing with adverse effects of tourniquet use have been published, but disagreement still remains as to whether TKA surgery should be performed with or without the use of a tourniquet (Smith and Hing 2010, Tai et al. 2011, Alcelik et al. 2012).We examined the effects of tourniquet use on functional and clinical outcome and on knee ROM. Furthermore, intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, surgical visibility and difficulties, postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and transfusion requirements were registered. We hypothesized that the absence of a tourniquet during TKA would improve functional outcomes and increase knee ROM, reduce postoperative pain levels, and reduce analgesic consumption.     

Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: A prospective study of imaging- and patient-related factors in 109 patients who were operated on by decompression

Background and purpose

A considerable number of patients who undergo surgery for spinal stenosis have residual symptoms and inferior function and health-related quality of life after surgery. There have been few studies on factors that may predict outcome. We tried to find predictors of outcome in surgery for spinal stenosis using patient- and imaging-related factors.

Patients and methods

109 patients in the Swedish Spine Register with central spinal stenosis that were operated on by decompression without fusion were prospectively followed up 1 year after surgery. Clinical outcome scores included the EQ-5D, the Oswestry disability index, self-estimated walking distance, and leg and back pain levels (VAS). Central dural sac area, number of levels with stenosis, and spondylolisthesis were included in the MRI analysis. Multivariable analyses were performed to search for correlation between patient-related and imaging factors and clinical outcome at 1-year follow-up.

Results

Several factors predicted outcome statistically significantly. Duration of leg pain exceeding 2 years predicted inferior outcome in terms of leg and back pain, function, and HRLQoL. Regular and intermittent preoperative users of analgesics had higher levels of back pain at follow-up than those not using analgesics. Low preoperative function predicted low function and dissatisfaction at follow-up. Low preoperative EQ-5D scores predicted a high degree of leg and back pain. Narrow dural sac area predicted more gains in terms of back pain at follow-up and lower absolute leg pain.

Interpretation

Multiple factors predict outcome in spinal stenosis surgery, most importantly duration of symptoms and preoperative function. Some of these are modifiable and can be targeted. Our findings can be used in the preoperative patient information and aid the surgeon and the patient in a shared decision making process.Decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis is the most frequently performed spine operation in many countries (Weinstein et al. 2006, Strömqvist et al. 2009). However, one third of patients are not satisfied with the outcome because of residual leg and back pain, inferior function, and poor health-related quality of life (Katz et al. 1995, Airaksinen et al. 1997, Jönsson et al. 1997, Jansson et al. 2009, Strömqvist et al. 2009, Hara et al. 2010).2 recent randomized studies have shown surgery to be superior to nonoperative treatment in lumbar spinal stenosis (Malmivaara et al. 2007, Weinstein et al. 2008), but many patients improve without surgical treatment (Malmivaara et al. 2007). The question remains as to who benefits most from surgery. Identification of prognostic factors that can aid in selection of patients for surgery is therefore important. Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery have been studied, but they are not well defined (Turner et al. 1992, Aalto et al. 2006). Aalto et al. (2006) reviewed studies of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery and found that only 21 studies of 885 were of sufficient quality to merit identification of prognostic factors. The main reason for exclusion was a retrospective study design and a limited number of predictors. Cardiovascular and overall comorbidity, disorders influencing walking ability, self-rated health, income, severity of central stenosis, and severity of scoliosis were found to be predictors of outcome, but no single study could identify more than one of these predictors. More recently, smoking, depression, psychiatric illness, and high body mass index have been found to be predictive of negative outcome, as have long duration of symptoms and preoperative resting numbness (Ng et al. 2007, Hara et al. 2010, Athiviraham et al. 2011, Radcliff et al. 2011, Sandén et al. 2011, Sinikallio et al. 2011).Cross-sectional imaging (most often MRI) has an important role in confirming the diagnosis of spinal stenosis, and is essential for surgical planning. Even so, the prognostic value of the narrowness of the dural sac area is not well established (Jönsson et al 1997, Amundsen et al. 2000, Yukawa et al. 2002). Studies incorporating both imaging and patient-related factors in a systematic way have been exceedingly rare (Amundsen et al. 2000, Yukawa et al. 2002).We used patient data from the Swedish Spine Register protocol (Strömqvist et al. 2009) and MRI measurements of central dural sac area, multilevel stenosis, and spondylolisthesis to find predictors of outcome in terms of function, HRLQoL, and leg and back pain after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.     

Risk of re-admission,reoperation, and mortality within 90 days of total hip and knee arthroplasty in fast-track departments in Denmark from 2005 to 2011

Purpose

To compare the risks of re-admission, reoperation, and mortality within 90 days of surgery in orthopedic departments with well-documented fast-track arthroplasty programs with those in all other orthopedic departments in Denmark from 2005 to 2011.

Methods

We used the Danish hip and knee arthroplasty registers to identify patients with primary total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty. Information about re-admission, reoperation, and mortality within 90 days of surgery was obtained from administrative databases. The fast-track cohort consisted of 6 departments. The national comparison cohort consisted of all other orthopedic departments. Regression methods were used to calculate relative risk (RR) of adverse events, adjusting for age, sex, type of fixation, and comorbidity. Cohorts were divided into 3 time periods: 2005–2007, 2008–2009, and 2010–2011.

Results

79,098 arthroplasties were included: 17,284 in the fast-track cohort and 61,814 in the national cohort. Median length of stay (LOS) was less for the fast-track cohort in all 3 time periods (4, 3, and 3 days as opposed to 6, 4, and 3 days). RR of re-admission due to infection was higher in the fast-track cohort in 2005–2007 (1.3, 95% CI: 1.1–1.6) than in the national cohort in the same time period. This was mainly due to urinary tract infections. RR of re-admission due to a thromboembolic event was lower in the fast-track cohort in 2010–2011 (0.7, CI: 0.6–0.9) than in the national cohort in the same time period. No differences were seen in the risk of reoperation and mortality between the 2 cohorts during any time period.

Interpretation

The general reduction in LOS indicates that fast-track arthroplasty programs have been widely implemented in Denmark. At the same time, it appears that dedicated fast-track departments have been able to optimize the fast-track program further without any rise in re-admission, reoperation, and mortality rates.Even though the main principles of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been unchanged for years, the clinical pathways for patients have been changed in many respects during the past decade, to enhance recovery, reduce morbidity, increase patient satisfaction, and reduce length of stay (LOS). These principles—often known as fast-track surgical programs, enhanced recovery programs, or rapid recovery protocols (they are known by many names)—have been widely adopted today for THA and TKA in Denmark (Kehlet 2013).Clinical studies have shown that the risks of thromboembolic complications (Husted et al. 2010a) and mortality (Malviya et al. 2011) have become reduced in THA and TKA when comparing the same department before and after implementation of fast-track programs. Also, patient-related outcomes such as pain, quality of life (Larsen et al. 2008, Raphael et al. 2011, den Hertog et al. 2012), and patient satisfaction are positively associated with fast-track surgery (Larsen et al. 2008, Machin et al. 2013). Thus, the implementation of fast-track programs reduces LOS in patients who have undergone THA and TKA (Husted and Holm 2006, Larsen et al. 2008, Malviya et al. 2011, Raphael et al. 2011, den Hertog et al. 2012, Hartog et al. 2013). In Denmark, LOS for both THA and TKA was reduced from 10–11 days in 2000 to 4 days in 2009 (Husted et al. 2012), indicating a general trend towards use of fast-track surgery in most or all of the orthopedic departments in Denmark.Today, 10 Danish orthopedic departments, supported by the Lundbeck Foundation Center for Fast-track Hip and Knee Replacement, have described their fast-track programs and results in detail (www.fthk.dk, Kehlet and Søballe 2010, Husted et al. 2010b). A common denominator for these departments is their compliance to well-documented interdisciplinary logistic and clinical instructions— all of which are known to be significant factors for improved and accelerated recovery (Barberi et al. 2009, Bozic et al. 2010). We hypothesized that results regarding morbidity and mortality from the fast-track departments would be comparable to or even better than results from other departments that use standard, less systematically described treatment regimes after THA and TKA.We therefore investigated whether orthopedic departments with well-documented fast-track THA and TKA programs had lower short-term risk of re-admission, reoperation, and mortality than all other orthopedic departments in Denmark during different stages of implementation of the fast-track programs in the period 2005–2011.     

Persistent pain is common 1–2 years after shoulder replacement: A nationwide registry-based questionnaire study of 538 patients

Results 538 patients were available for analysis. The prevalence of persistent pain was 22% (CI: 18–25), and the prevalence of presumed neuropathic pain was 13% (CI: 10–16). Persistent pain was more frequent in fracture patients (29%) than in osteoarthritis patients (16%), while the prevalence of neuropathic pain was similar. Severe pain during the first postoperative week increased the risk of persistent pain. Risk also increased with hemiprosthesis (as compared to total prosthesis) in osteoarthritis patients, and with previous osteosynthesis and pain elsewhere in fracture patients.Interpretation Persistent pain after shoulder replacement is a daily burden for many patients. Further studies should address patient and prosthesis selection, postoperative pain management, and follow-up of these patients.There is a substantial amount of literature documenting that there is a possible risk of persistent pain after almost any surgical procedure (Macrae 2001, Johansen et al. 2012). The prevalence rates are highly dependent on the type of surgery, and vary from 5% to 85% (Kehlet et al. 2006, Macrae 2008). The consequences of chronic or persistent postsurgical pain are significant, not only in terms of suffering and reduced quality of life for the individual patient, but also with regard to the subsequent costs to healthcare services and social services. Many authors have reported putative risk factors for persistent pain, including genetic factors, age, psychosocial factors, type of anesthesia, pain elsewhere than the surgical site, other comorbidities, preoperative pain, and acute postoperative pain (Althaus et al. 2012, VanDenKerkhof et al. 2013). Intraoperative nerve damage and the extent of surgery are also important risk factors (Katz and Seltzer 2009). In fact, many patients with persistent postsurgical pain present with characteristic symptoms of neuropathic pain in the affected area (Kehlet et al. 2006).There is a scarcity of data on persistent postsurgical pain after orthopedic surgery. To our knowledge, previous studies focusing on persistent postsurgical pain in orthopedic patients have concerned mainly amputation or hip or knee replacement (Nikolajsen et al. 2006, Lundblad et al. 2008, Beswick et al. 2012, Liu et al. 2012, Jansen et al. 2014). Trials of shoulder replacement surgery have more commonly reported pain relief, or a composite score including pain, rather than the prevalence of pain at follow-up. There has been very little research on predictive factors for persistent postsurgical pain following shoulder replacement, but the general outcome has been shown to be associated with diagnosis and prosthesis type (Radnay et al. 2007, Fevang et al. 2013) and with previous shoulder surgery, age, and preoperative Short Form-36 mental score and DASH functional score (Simmen et al. 2008). Identification of subgroups at increased risk is important in order to establish interventions to prevent or minimize the impact of persistent postsurgical pain.We investigated the prevalence of, the characteristics of, and risk factors for persistent pain 1–2 years after more than 500 shoulder replacements performed in Denmark.     

Failure of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties: 145 revision failures from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1994–2011

MethodThis study was based on 1,016 aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register between 1994 and 2011. Revisions done for infections were not included. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess the survival rate and the relative risk of re-revision with all causes of re-revision as endpoint.Results145 knees failed after revision total knee arthroplasty. Deep infection was the most frequent cause of re-revision (28%), followed by instability (26%), loose tibial component (17%), and pain (10%). The cumulative survival rate for revision total knee arthroplasties was 85% at 5 years, 78% at 10 years, and 71% at 15 years. Revision total knee arthroplasties with exchange of the femoral or tibial component exclusively had a higher risk of re-revision (RR = 1.7) than those with exchange of the whole prosthesis. The risk of re-revision was higher for men (RR = 2.0) and for patients aged less than 60 years (RR = 1.6).InterpretationIn terms of implant survival, revision of the whole implant was better than revision of 1 component only. Young age and male sex were risk factors for re-revision. Deep infection was the most frequent cause of failure of revision of aseptic total knee arthroplasties.Globally, the number of knee arthroplasty operations is increasing. In the USA, the incidence of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased from 51 per 10⁵ inhabitants in 1990 (Kurtz et al. 2007) to 215 per 10⁵ in 2008 (Carr et al. 2012). In Sweden, the incidence of knee arthroplasty increased from 115 per 10⁵ inhabitants in 2007 (Robertsson et al. 2010) to 135 per 10⁵ in 2011 (Sundberg et al. 2012). In Norway, the incidence increased from 35 per 10⁵ inhabitants (Furnes et al. 2002) in 1999 to 90 per 10⁵ in 2011 (Furnes et al. 2012).With an increasing aging population and increase in the use of joint arthroplasty in younger people, the increase in knee arthroplasty surgery will continue (Carr et al. 2012)—as will the need for revision TKA (Kurtz et al. 2007). In the United States, for example, projections suggest that the number of revision TKAs will have increased from 38,000 in 2005 to 268,000 by the year 2030 (Kurtz et al. 2007). In Norway, the revision burden, defined as the ratio of revision arthroplasties to the total number of arthroplasties, increased from 6.9% in 1994 to 8.5% in 2011 (Furnes et al. 2012).Many studies on knee arthroplasty have been based on data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR), but all of them concerned primary TKAs (Furnes et al. 2002, 2007, Lygre et al. 2010a, b, Lygre et al. 2011, Gothesen et al. 2013). No studies on the survivorship and the mode of failure of revision TKAs have been conducted in Norway, even though revision of joint arthroplasties is becoming a challenge both medically and economically (Greidanus et al. 2011). Moreover, different surgical techniques have been described on how to approach revision knee arthroplasties with regard to fixation (Sheng et al. 2006, Whiteside 2006, Beckmann et al. 2011, Cintra et al. 2011), role of constraint and stem use (Fehring et al. 2003, Hwang et al. 2010), and whether or not to resurface the patella (Masri et al. 2006, Patil et al. 2010). However, there have been very few comprehensive studies on the outcome of revision TKA. Thus, the main aim of this study was to analyze the survival rate of revision TKAs and to study the causes of failure of revision TKAs based on data in a national registry. A secondary aim was to determine whether the survival of revision TKAs is influenced by type of fixation, brand of prosthesis, and resurfacing of the patella. The study hypothesis was that type of fixation, brand of prosthesis, and resurfacing of the patella would have no influence on the survival rate of revision TKAs.