The impact of thymoglobulin on renal function and calcineurin inhibitor initiation in recipients of orthotopic liver transplant: a retrospective analysis of 298 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction remains the Achilles' heel of calcineurin inhibitor (CI)use. The purpose of this study was to assess our institutional, renal-sparing strategy using thymoglobulin (TMG) in recipients of orthotopic liver transplants. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 298 adult recipients who were transplanted between 1991 and 2002. The patients were divided into two groups: those induced with TMG (group 1) and those that were not treated with this agent (group 2). A subgroup analysis was performed of patients with baseline serum creatinine values above 1.5 mg/dL (group 1A received TMG; group 2A did not). All patients received tacrolimus or cyclosporine (CyA) maintenance immunosuppression. RESULTS: Indications and demographics were similar between the two groups. Although there was no difference in patient and graft survivals, there was a statistically significant benefit in the rejection-free graft survival at 1 year for group 1 (51% vs 39%; P =.02). Furthermore, serum creatinine at 6 months was lower for group 1, despite a similar baseline creatinine. Subgroup analysis for patients with baseline abnormal serum creatinines showed that group 1A displayed an improved rejection-free graft survival at 1 month but not at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Thymoglobulin induction therapy may allow a delay in the initiation of CI therapy without compromising patient and graft survival, while preventing early rejection, even among patients with baseline renal dysfunction.     

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal transplant dysfunction in part may be due to the nephrotoxic effects of calcineurin inhibitors, which are still the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy. Sirolimus, a new immunosuppressive compound devoid of significant nephrotoxicity, might therefore exhibit beneficial effects when used in renal transplant recipients with graft dysfunction. METHODS: Twelve renal transplant recipients included in this study had all been receiving calcineurin inhibitors for more than 12 months, and were free of rejection for more than 12 months. However, they demonstrated moderate renal dysfunction with serum creatinine values ranging from 1.8 to 4.0 mg/dL (164 to 351 micromol/L). After reaching a sirolimus level of 10 to 20 ng/mL, calcineurin inhibitor therapy was withheld. RESULTS: One month after initiation of sirolimus therapy, all patients were off calcineurin inhibitors. The average daily sirolimus dosage was 5.8+/-3.4 mg. No acute rejection episode and no graft failure was observed. No patient required hemodialysis or admission to the hospital. Calculated creatinine clearance increased from 63.4+/-9.9 to 69.2+/-9.7 mL/min (P=.0368) and serum bicarbonate increased from 20.8+/-3.17 to 22.5+/-3.7 meq/L (P=.001). Serum cholesterol increased from 180+/-26.5 to 239+/-28.8 mg/dL (4.65+/-0.69 to 6.18+/-0.74 mmol/L, P<.001), triglycerides increased from 155+/-53 to 289+/-123 mg/dL (1.75+/-0.6 to 3.26+/-1.39 mmol/L) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased from 99+/-32 to 131+/-25.1 mg/dL (2.56+/-0.83 to 3.39+/-0.65 mmol/L, P=.01). Arterial blood pressure remained well controlled (126+/-15.6/74+/-8.9 vs 134+/-16.8/83+/-9.7). CONCLUSION: Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to sirolimus in patients more than 1 year after transplantation with impaired organ function is feasible, safe, and associated with a trend toward improved renal function.     

Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody sequential immunosuppressive induction therapy in renal transplants with high risk of delayed graft function

There is little experience on the use of monoclonal antibodies that block the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (basiliximab and daclizumab) in sequential therapy in renal transplants with risk of delayed graft function. This study sougth to test the efficacy and safety of the substitution of anticalcineurins with two doses of basiliximab or daclizumab in the immediate posttransplant period for recipients at risk of delayed renal graft function. Immunosuppression consisted of steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and two doses of basiliximab (20 mg/day) on days 0 and 4 posttransplant or daclizumab (1 mg/kg per day) on days 0 and 15 posttransplant. Anticalcineurins were not administered until the beginning of graft function. Among 49 recipients (mean age 63.5 +/- 10.5 years), 40 received a kidney from a donor over 60 years of age, three from a non-heart-beating donor, and six from donors with an acute elevation of serum creatinine to 2.4 +/- 0.86 (1.7-3.7). At a mean follow-up of 14.2 +/- 8.4 months, five patients experienced acute rejection episodes. Only 15 patients needed posttransplant dialysis (2.7 +/- 1.6). In 11 patients, cyclosporine (CsA) was introduced at 6 +/- 2.9 days posttransplant and in 37, tacrolimus on 8.6 +/- 3.6 days posttransplant. The incidence of kidney graft loss was 16.3%. Patient survival was 96%. Thirty-nine recipients are alive with functioning grafts, with mean serum creatinine of 1.4 mg/dL. In conclusion, substitution for anticalcineurins with interleukin-2-receptor blockade in the immediate posttransplant period for patients at risk of delayed graft function minimizes nephrotoxicity and reduces tubular necrosis, without increasing the risk of an acute rejection episode.     

Preserving renal function in liver transplant recipients with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin and delayed initiation of calcineurin inhibitors.

Early renal dysfunction following liver transplantation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. To evaluate the impact of delayed initiation of calcineurin inhibitor on renal function, we conducted a retrospective study comparing 118 liver transplant recipients who received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin and delayed initiation of calcineurin inhibitor with 80 liver transplant recipients who received no antibody and early initiation of calcineurin inhibitor (control group). All patients received mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Delayed calcineurin inhibitor initiation with anti-thymocyte globulin was associated with significant improvement in renal function throughout the first year post-transplant. At 12 months post-transplant, patients treated with this regimen experienced lower serum creatinine (1.4 +/- 0.5 versus 1.7 +/- 0.5 mg/dL, P < 0.001), a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (57.4 +/- 20.5 versus 43.7 +/- 14.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P < 0.001), and less dependence on dialysis (0.8% versus 13%, P < 0.001) in comparison with no antibody and early calcineurin inhibitor initiation. Patient survival and graft survival were similar between groups; however, there was a trend of a lower incidence of early biopsy-proven acute rejection with anti-thymocyte globulin. Overall infection and cytomegalovirus infection were significantly lower in anti-thymocyte globulin-treated patients, and there was no increased incidence of hepatitis C recurrence in comparison with controls. In conclusion, delayed initiation of calcineurin inhibitor with anti-thymocyte globulin in liver transplant recipients is safe and is associated with improvements in renal function and a lower incidence of early acute rejection in comparison with no antibody and early initiation of calcineurin inhibitor.     

The impact of thymoglobulin on renal function and calcineurin inhibitor initiation in recipients of orthotopic liver transplant : A retrospective analysis of 298 consecutive patients

Background

Renal dysfunction remains the Achilles' heel of calcineurin inhibitor (CI)use. The purpose of this study was to assess our institutional, renal-sparing strategy using thymoglobulin (TMG) in recipients of orthotopic liver transplants.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 298 adult recipients who were transplanted between 1991 and 2002. The patients were divided into two groups: those induced with TMG (group 1) and those that were not treated with this agent (group 2). A subgroup analysis was performed of patients with baseline serum creatinine values above 1.5 mg/dL (group 1A received TMG; group 2A did not). All patients received tacrolimus or cyclosporine (CyA) maintenance immunosuppression.

Results

Indications and demographics were similar between the two groups. Although there was no difference in patient and graft survivals, there was a statistically significant benefit in the rejection-free graft survival at 1 year for group 1 (51% vs 39%; P = .02). Furthermore, serum creatinine at 6 months was lower for group 1, despite a similar baseline creatinine. Subgroup analysis for patients with baseline abnormal serum creatinines showed that group 1A displayed an improved rejection-free graft survival at 1 month but not at 1 year.

Conclusions

Thymoglobulin induction therapy may allow a delay in the initiation of CI therapy without compromising patient and graft survival, while preventing early rejection, even among patients with baseline renal dysfunction.     

Early Withdrawal of Calcineurin Inhibitors and Rescue Immunosuppression with Sirolimus-Based Therapy in Renal Transplant Recipients with Moderate to Severe Renal Dysfunction

Mammalian Target-of-Rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR inhibitors) can be used to replace the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to prevent progression in chronic kidney disease (CKD) following organ transplantation. Discontinuation of tacrolimus in 136 recipients of kidney transplants with progressive renal dysfunction significantly decreased the rate of loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m(2)) (pre-intervention vs. post-intervention slopes, -0.013 vs. -0.002, p < 0.0001). Discontinuation of tacrolimus was associated with a sustained and significant improvement in graft function (pre-eGFR vs. post-eGFR; 26.0 +/- 1.1 vs. 47.4 +/- 2.1, p < 0.0001) in 74% of patients. This intervention was ineffective if the mean and (median) values of creatinine (mg/dL) and eGFR were 3.8 +/- 0.2 (3.4) and 18.4 +/- 1.9 (22.4), respectively, at the time of conversion therapy. During the follow-up (range, 1.5-34.6, months), a total of 13 patients had their first acute rejection following the conversion therapy, an annual incidence of less than 10% and none of these episodes resulted in graft loss. The salutary effects of sirolimus therapy following discontinuation of tacrolimus in patients with moderate to severe graft dysfunction due to allograft nephropathy even in high-risk patients improves kidney function and prevents acute rejection.     

Peritransplant immunoadsorption: a strategy enabling transplantation in highly sensitized crossmatch-positive cadaveric kidney allograft recipients

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients with a current positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) are at high risk for hyperacute rejection and graft loss. Immunoadsorption (IA) represents an efficient strategy to remove donor-specific alloantibodies. In this analysis, we evaluated effectiveness of peritransplant IA as an anti-humoral strategy to overcome a current positive CDCXM in presensitized renal allograft recipients. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2003, 40 high risk cadaveric kidney allograft recipients (median CDC panel reactive antibody [PRA] level, 77%; number of retransplants, n = 38) were subjected to peritransplant IA with protein A (one pretransplant IA session followed by a course of repeat posttransplant IA sessions) in addition to preemptive antilymphocyte antibody therapy. RESULTS: In nine of these patients, a current positive CDCXM was rendered negative by a single pretransplant IA session. Thirty-one recipients had a negative CDCXM already before pretransplant IA. No difference in graft survival was found between CDCXM-positive and CDCXM-negative recipients (3-year graft survival, 78% vs. 71%, P = 0.6). Comparable rates of immunological graft loss at 3 years were observed (11% vs. 13%, P = 0.8). Patient groups did not significantly differ with respect to median serum creatinine at 1 year (1.23 mg/dL [CDCXM-positive] vs. 1.57 mg/dl [CDCXM-negative], P = 0.07) and at the end of follow-up (median 32 months; 1.19 mg/dL vs. 1.63 mg/dL, P = 0.06). Moreover, patient groups showed similar rates of biopsy-proven cellular rejection (11% vs. 20%) or C4d-positive graft dysfunction (33% vs. 32%). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that peritransplant IA enables successful cadaveric kidney transplantation in the context of a positive CDCXM.     

Experience with daclizumab in liver transplantation: renal transplant dosing without calcineurin inhibitors is insufficient to prevent acute rejection in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Daclizumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of the interleukin 2 receptor. We review our experience with the use of daclizumab in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Thirty-two patients were given daclizumab as induction therapy in the setting of hepatic transplantation. Seven of these patients were enrolled in a pilot study to determine the efficacy of daclizumab in conjunction with corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil without the initial use of calcineurin inhibitors (CI). The remaining 25 patients received daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids, with the institution of CI generally within the first postoperative week. The majority of these patients (n = 17) had some degree of renal insufficiency. RESULTS: The pilot study was halted after the first seven patients were enrolled because of an unacceptably high rate of rejection (7/7 = 100%). The patients outside of this pilot study, however, had a much lower rate of rejection (36%). The incidence and severity of rejection correlated with the delay in institution of CI. The described dosing schedule resulted in subtherapeutic daclizumab levels in liver transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab used in liver transplant recipients without any CI was ineffective and can potentially lead to steroid-resistant rejection. The dosing regimen used in renal transplant recipients is most likely insufficient for liver transplant patients. However, daclizumab can be used safely in patients with preexisting or postoperative renal dysfunction in conjunction with low doses of CI given within the first week postoperatively.     

Basiliximab versus daclizumab combined with triple immunosuppression in deceased donor renal graft recipients

In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study, we compared the efficacy and safety of two anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies among adult recipients of at least 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. Eligible patients were randomized to induction with either basiliximab or daclizumab. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, the renal graft function, the safety, and the patient and graft survivals. Among 127 patients, six (10.0%) and seven (11.5%) patients experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months, in the basiliximab and the daclizumab groups, respectively. Two renal grafts were lost in the basiliximab and six in the daclizumab cohort, one of them due to rejection. One basiliximab and two daclizumab patients died. Hospital treatment was required for 25 and 33 infections in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. One basal cell carcinoma of skin was detected. One hypersensitivity reaction was observed with daclizumab. At 12 months, serum creatinine was 101+/-28 micromol/L with basiliximab and 109+/-41 micromol/L with daclizumab. Patient survival was 98.4% with basiliximab and 96.7% with daclizumab, and graft survival was 96.8% versus 90.8%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. Basiliximab or daclizumab combined with triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with low incidence of acute rejection episodes, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high survival rates in adult recipients within the first year after deceased donor renal transplantation.     

The use of daclizumab as induction therapy in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in recipients with previous transplants

Clinical trials using daclizumab as induction therapy in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes in solid organ transplantation. In an attempt to obtain a low rejection rate we proceeded with the use of daclizumab as induction therapy, in combination with TAC and MMF for recipients with previous transplants. In this study, we analyzed patients who received previous transplants, treated with the above immunosuppressive regimen. Group A consisted of four patients with previous liver transplants, group B consisted of 16 recipients with previous kidney transplants and group C consisted of three patients with previous simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants. All patients underwent cadaveric kidney transplants except one patient in group B, who underwent a pancreas transplant. At 12 months, patient and graft survival for all groups was 100 and 100%, respectively. Acute rejection rate was 0% for group A, 12.5% for group B, and 0% for group C. Daclizumab induction therapy is effective for patients with previous transplants and does not appear to increase the risk of acute rejection.     

Development of posttransplant antidonor HLA antibodies is associated with acute humoral rejection and early graft dysfunction

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to determine whether the production of posttransplant antibodies directed against donor HLA mismatches (donor specific antibody; DSA) is associated with renal allograft rejection and early graft dysfunction. METHODS: Forty-nine adult renal allograft recipients with increased risk of rejection were enrolled during the period of October 2001 through May 2003 and were prospectively monitored for the development of anti-HLA antibodies. RESULTS: Of 49 patients, eight (16.3 %) patients were diagnosed with acute humoral rejection (AHR) and 11/49 (22.4%) patients were diagnosed with acute cellular rejection (ACR). A strong association between pretransplant HLA sensitization and AHR was found (P=0.005). Of the eight patients diagnosed with AHR, the majority developed DSA before or concomitant with episodes of rejection (P<0.001). Only 3 of 41 patients (7.3%) without AHR developed DSA. The pathogenic role of alloantibodies was further substantiated by analyzing their association with graft function as measured by serum creatinine levels. The average serum creatinine after the third month posttransplantation in DSA producers was 2.24+/-1.01 mg/dL, while in non-DSA patients the average serum creatinine was 1.41+/-0.37 mg/dL (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: This study reveals a strong association between the production of DSA, AHR, and early graft dysfunction. Our findings indicate that prospective monitoring for anti-HLA antibodies following transplantation is a useful test for the diagnosis and classification of AHR for identifying patients at risk of early graft dysfunction.     

Comparison of basiliximab and daclizumab with triple immunosuppression in renal transplantation

Purpose

Graft rejection is a serious problem despite immunosuppressive agents. Immunosuppression has been achieved with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) that bind specifically to the α subunit of the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor present on activated T lymphocytes. We explored the effects of two of the mAbs-daclizumab and basiliximab-on graft function.

Materials and methods

Our 1543 renal transplant recipients received baseline therapy with cyclosporine or tacrolimus plus corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil. In addition standard dosages intravenously of daclizumab (n = 156) or basiliximab (n = 45) in were administered intravenously to 201 renal transplant patients who included 122 men and 79 women of overall mean age of 30 ± 13.7 years.

Results

Patient and donor characteristics including age, sex, causes of renal failure, presence of comorbidities, panel-reactive antibodies, and numbers of human leukocyte antigen-mismatched were similar between the groups. During a mean follow-up of 27 ± 20 months, biopsy-proven acute rejection was observed in three patients in the basiliximab group and 23 in the daclizumab group. Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 13 patients. There was no case of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Three polyoma BK nephropathies were detected in the daclizumab group. No hypersensitivity reaction occurred in either group. One-year patient survival was 100% in the basiliximab group and 99% in the daclizumab group, with graft survivals of 95% versus 94%, respectively. The mean creatinine levels at discharge were 2 mg/dL versus 2.3 mg/dL and at 12 months, 1.3 mg/dL versus 1.2 mg/dL, respectively.

Conclusions

Acute rejection episodes remain a significant risk factor for the development of graft dysfunction and poor long-term graft survival. IL-2R antagonists were effective antibody therapies. There was no apparent difference between basiliximab and daclizumab treatment.     

Can daclizumab reduce acute rejection and improve long‐term renal function in tacrolimus‐based primary renal transplant recipients?

SUMMARY: Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a tacrolimus‐based immunosuppressive regimen with and without induction therapy using daclizumab in first cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Methods: Since January 2001, we studied the effect of daclizumab in a non‐randomized and prospective study of 36 sequential first cadaveric renal transplant recipients. They were compared with a historical control group of 21 sequential first cadaveric renal transplant recipients without induction therapy. All patients received tacrolimus, azathioprine and corticosteroids as concomitant immunosuppressive therapy. Daclizumab was given at 1 mg/kg infusion 2 h before transplantation and then every 14 days for four more doses. Outcomes measured included incidence of acute rejection, patient survival, graft survival, annualized change in creatinine clearance (CrCl), cardiovascular risk profile, infection and malignancy. Results: Fewer biopsy proven acute rejections were observed in the induction treatment group: 11.1% (4/36) versus 19% (4/21) but the rejection free survival was similar (P = 0.37). The patient survival and graft survival were comparable. The renal function was similar in both groups. There were also no significant difference in infection, malignancy and cardiovascular risk profile in both groups. Conclusion: Adding daclizumab to a tacrolimus‐based therapy is safe but cannot further improve clinical efficacy.     

Conversion therapy to everolimus in renal transplant recipients: results after one year

BACKGROUND: Two new diagnoses have been causing graft loss during long-term follow-up, namely, chronic nephropathy and anticalcineurinic toxicity. The advent of the mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR) obviates anticalcineurine toxicity and reduces posttransplant malignancy incidence with good inmunosuppressive potential. We examinated the renal and metabolic behavior in renal transplant recipients who required conversion from an anticalcineurinic (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) to an m-TOR inhibitor (everolimus) as part of their immunosuppressive maintenance therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one first renal transplant recipients had everolimus added to their inmunosuppressive therapy combined with an antimetabolite (mycophenolate mofetil or sodium mycophenolate). The mean age of the patients was 35 +/- 17 years (range, 6 to 65). The prevalence of male recipients was 57%; the overall mean weight, 64 kg (range, 48 to 95). All patients were hispanic with 15 transplants from cadaveric donors (71%). The mean follow-up posttransplant was 18 months (range, 3 to 40) and the mean follow-up on everolimus, 10 months (range, 2 to 22). RESULTS: There was no mortality or graft loss, but there were 3 (17%) biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes. There were no significant changes in metabolic function pre- or postconversion. Regarding renal function, the mean creatinine serum showed a trend to decline: preconversion 1.7 mg/dL; postconversion 1.5 mg/dL. In 10 patients, it was possible to discontinue at least one antihypertensive medication (48%). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus was an effective medication to manage renal transplant patients. It produced metabolic stability and low myelotoxicity, despite combination with an antimetabolite (mycophenolic acid). Also, reduction of antihypertensive medications was an additional benefits for many patients.     

An open-label, pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of converting from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in established renal allograft recipients with moderate renal insufficiency

This pilot study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of converting from a calcineurin inhibitor (CI) to a sirolimus (SRL)-based regimen in established renal transplant recipients with moderate renal insufficiency. Sixty renal transplant recipients on CI-based immuno-suppression with a serum creatinine (SCr) between 159 and 265 microM (1.8 and 3.0 mg/dL) and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 30 and 70 mL/min were enrolled. SRL dosing was dependent upon concomitant immunosuppressive therapy. The mean patient age was 45 yr and the mean time from transplant to study enrollment was 60.8 months (range: 7-198). The median SCr was 168 microM (1.9 mg/dL) and the median GFR was 51 mL/min. Twelve months after conversion the patient and graft survival rates were 96.7% and 95%, respectively. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 3.3% (two cases reported, Banff grades IA and IB). The median SCr and median creatinine clearance were 168 microM (1.9 mg/dL) and 53 mL/min, respectively. Hyperlipidemia, diarrhea, peripheral edema, rash, and anemia were the most commonly reported adverse events. Patients with moderate renal insufficiency can be converted from CI to SRL-based therapy and maintain renal function over a 1-yr period.     

A calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimen with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and anti-CD25 mAb provides effective immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation is a significant risk factor for early acute rejection and graft loss. Sirolimus (SRL) can be administered in the setting of DGF without exacerbating the impaired renal function after transplantation. We examined a calcineurin-sparing regimen using SRL during the early post-operative period in renal transplant patients with delayed or impaired graft function. A retrospective review of 14 consecutive kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function who received SRL was performed. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of daclizumab induction (2 mg/kg), SRL (5-15 mg load followed by 2 5 mg daily maintenance therapy), corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1.5-3 g/d). Patients were monitored for allograft function, acute rejection, graft survival, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia. Serum levels of SRL were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography performed at an independent commercial laboratory. Donors were cadaveric in 13 cases and living related in one. The duration of follow-up was 0.5-5.2 months. Nine patients required hemodialysis after transplantation. The mean time to initiation of calcineurin inhibitors was 21 +/- 13 d. Average serum creatinine levels at the initiation of SRL and at 1 month after transplantation were 8.4 +/- 2.7 and 2.1 +/- 1.2 mg/dL, respectively. There were 2 patients (14%) who experienced acute rejection within the first month after transplantation -1 with type I (steroid therapy) and 1 with type II (anti-thymocyte therapy). Serum levels of SRL were initially undetectable in the 2 patients with acute rejection. No grafts were lost during the period of follow-up. Three patients developed thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100 x 10(9)) and no patients developed leukopenia. The combination of SRL with anti-CD25 mAb, MMF, and corticosteroids appears to provide effective non-nephrotoxic immunosuppression for kidney transplantation without the need for a lymphocyte-depleting regimen. However, it is important to monitor serum SRL levels to determine the optimal dosing regimen. Furthermore, long-term follow-up of these patients will be helpful to determine whether improved immunosuppression can be achieved with a fully calcineurin-sparing regimen using SRL.     

Kidney transplantation without calcineurin inhibitor drugs: a prospective,randomized trial of sirolimus versus cyclosporine

BACKGROUND: Progressive nephrotoxicity caused by calcineurin inhibitor drugs contributes to the long-term decline in renal function in kidney transplant patients. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, prospective trial of calcineurin inhibitor drug avoidance in 61 adult primary kidney transplant recipients. Each patient received induction therapy with 20 mg basiliximab on days 0 and 4, and maintenance therapy with mycophenolate mofetil 1 g two times per day and steroids. Thirty-one patients received sirolimus, 5 mg daily after a 15-mg loading dose. Doses were then concentration-controlled to keep 24-hr trough levels at 10 to 12 ng/mL for 6 months and 5 to 10 ng/mL thereafter. Thirty patients began cyclosporine therapy at 6 to 8 mg/kg per day in divided doses and were then concentration-controlled to keep 12-hr troughs of 200 to 250 ng/mL. RESULTS: Mean follow-up is 18.1 months (range, 12-26 months). The percentages of 1-year patient survival, graft survival, and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rates were not significantly different between the sirolimus-treated patients (96.7%, 96.7%, and 6.4%, respectively) and the cyclosporine-treated patients (100%, 95.4%, and 16.6%, respectively). At 6 and 12 months, respectively, the sirolimus-treated patients enjoyed significantly better (P=0.008 and P=0.004) mean serum creatinine levels (1.29 and 1.32 mg/dL) and calculated creatinine clearances (77.8 and 81.1 mL/min) than cyclosporine-treated patients (1.74 and 1.78 mg/dL, and 64.1 and 61.1 mL/min, respectively). Sirolimus-treated recipients have significantly (P=0.001) higher 1-year trough levels of mycophenolic acid (4.16 ng/mL) than cyclosporine-treated patients (1.93 ng/mL). Sirolimus also delays the repopulation of basiliximab-depleted CD25 T cells compared with cyclosporine. CONCLUSIONS: Calcineurin inhibitor drug avoidance with basiliximab induction and sirolimus provides comparable 1-year transplant outcomes, with significantly better renal function in primary renal allograft recipients.     

WOFIE synergizes with calcineurin-inhibitor treatment and early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: According to the window of opportunity for immunologic engagement (WOFIE) concept, as designed by R. Calne, the authors prospectively analyzed the effect of a 72-hr immunosuppressive window on graft function in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Immunosuppressive therapy comprised tacrolimus (trough levels, 5-8 ng/mL after day 8 posttransplantation), daclizumab (1 mg/kg body weight at day 0 and 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks posttransplantation), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1-2 g/day), and prednisolone. All patients received an induction therapy including daclizumab, prednisolone, and MMF. WOFIE patients were stopped from immunosuppression for 72 hr posttransplant. Steroids were withdrawn in both groups 12 to 16 weeks after transplantation and dual therapy with MMF and low-dose tacrolimus ensued. RESULTS: Thirty renal transplant recipients (16 in the WOFIE group and 14 in the control group) have been enrolled since May 2000. Patient and graft survival were 93.8% and 87.5%, respectively, in the WOFIE group and 100.0% and 92.9% in the control group, respectively. One patient in the WOFIE group died of cytomegalovirus infection with stable graft function. There were no grafts lost because of acute rejection or primary nonfunction in either group. Patients treated according to the WOFIE protocol revealed less acute rejection episodes during the time of observation (first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rate 12.5% in the WOFIE group vs. 42.9% in the control cohort). Whereas 92.1% of the WOFIE patients were successfully discontinued from steroids, permanent steroid withdrawal was achieved in only 60% of the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Initial interruption of immunosuppression was associated with a decrease of acute graft rejections. Subsequently, the authors postulate a synergistic effect on the immunosuppressive efficiency of calcineurin inhibitors when combined with an initial drug-free window.     

Role of splenectomy in renal transplantation

One hundred sixteen renal transplants in 99 patients were reviewed. Patients were divided into four groups: 53 live donor recipients with pretransplant splenectomy, 13 nonsplenectomized live donor recipients, 20 cadaver recipients with splenectomy, and 30 nonsplenectomized cadaver recipients. Nonsplenectomized live donor recipients had fewer rejection episodes per month of graft function (p < 0.005). Serum creatinine in functioning grafts showed no differences between splenectomized and nonsplenectomized patients. In 73 splenectomized patients there were 14 related septic and/or thromboembolic complications, 6 fatal. Mean daily azathioprine dosage was greater in splenectomized patients (p < 0.005). There were no hyperacute rejections of second transplants in splenectomized patients, while 2 occurred in 8 nonsplenectomized patients. Splenectomy prior to renal transplantation did not decrease the number of rejection episodes per month of graft function and was associated with a higher rate of septic and thromboembolic complications.     

Should living-unrelated renal transplant recipients receive antibody induction? Results of a clinical experience trial

BACKGROUND: Living-donor kidney transplant recipients generally do not receive antibody induction. Induction avoidance may not be appropriate, particularly for living-unrelated renal transplant (LURT) recipients, in whom matching may not be optimal. We compared the incidence of acute rejection and graft outcome of LURT recipients who were administered no induction and cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) recipients who were administered anti-CD25 antibody. These groups both had immediate graft function and similar maintenance immunosuppression. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients who received kidney transplants between 1999 and 2000. CRT recipients received basiliximab, corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and delayed tacrolimus (serum creatinine <3 mg/dL). LURT recipients received tacrolimus (initiated pretransplantation), MMF, and corticosteroids. RESULTS: The analysis included 136 LURT recipients and 126 CRT recipients. CRT recipients included more African Americans (52.4% vs. 30.9%, P<0.01). LURT recipients included more patients with at least one human leukocyte antigen mismatch (97.8% vs. 85.7%, P<0.01). A higher acute rejection rate was observed in LURT recipients at both 6 months (LURT recipients 19.1% vs. CRT recipients 3.2%, P<0.01) and 1 year (21.3% vs. 4.0%, P<0.0004); a higher rate also was observed in African American LURT recipients compared with African American CRT recipients (35.7% vs. 4.5%, P<0.0015) at 1 year. LURT recipients demonstrated a threefold greater rejection risk than CRT recipients who were administered basiliximab (relative risk: 3.6, P<0.002). Graft survival was similar at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The higher rejection rates in LURT recipients (no induction) compared with CRT recipients (basiliximab induction), despite similar chronic immunosuppression (tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids) and immediate graft function, indicate the potential advantage of anti-CD25 induction in LURT protocols to reduce the risk of acute rejection.