Gastric distention: a mechanism for postprandial gastroesophageal reflux

The occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux after meals may be related to an increase in the rate of transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxations, the mechanisms of which are not understood. We investigated the effects of gastric distention on LES pressure in 16 normal subjects and 17 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Intraluminal pressure was measured in the gastric fundus, LES, and esophageal body with a manometric catheter incorporating a sleeve device. Gastric distention was performed by injecting 0, 250, 500, or 750 ml of air in randomized order into a balloon and maintaining each stimulus for 15 min. Gastric distention did not significantly alter resting LES pressure in either group. During the basal period the rate of transient LES relaxation in the reflux patients (1.1 +/- 0.4 per 15 min) was greater than that in the normal subjects (0.6 +/- 0.1 per 15 min). Gastric distention resulted in a significant threefold to fourfold increase in the rate of transient LES relaxations in both groups. The reflux patients had a significantly greater proportion of complete relaxations (87%) than did the normal subjects (73%). We conclude that gastric distention, by significantly increasing the rate of transient LES relaxations in both normal subjects and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, may contribute to the postprandial increase in gastroesophageal reflux.     

Characteristics and frequency of transient relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with reflux esophagitis

Electromyogram of the submental muscles, esophageal manometry, and pH studies were simultaneously performed in an unselected group of 12 patients with subjective and objective evidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) disease to determine the frequency of transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and mechanisms of GER. Findings from these patients were compared with data from 10 asymptomatic healthy volunteers. Recordings were obtained for 1 h in the fasting state and 3 h after a standard 850-kcal meal. Transient relaxation of the LES was the only mechanism of acid reflux in normal subjects and accounted for 73.0% of the episodes of acid reflux in patients with GER disease. In both normal subjects and patients with GER, a large number of transient relaxations were associated at their onset with an attenuated submental EMG complex, a small pharyngeal contraction, and an esophageal contraction. The incidences of these associated events were similar in the two study populations. The frequency of transient relaxation of the LES in patients with GER was identical to that of controls. The frequency did not differ even in 9 patients with GER disease who had endoscopic esophagitis. Thirty-six percent of transient relaxations in the normal subjects were accompanied by pH evidence of reflux, but in the GER patients with endoscopic esophagitis 65% of the transient LES relaxations resulted in a reflux event. Acid reflux at the moment of deep inspiration was the second most common mechanism of GER in our patients. Four patients who demonstrated this mechanism had hiatal hernias and more severe esophagitis than the rest of the group. Our findings confirm that transient relaxation of the LES is the major mechanism of GER in patients with reflux esophagitis. However, the similar frequency of this relaxation in GER patients and in healthy asymptomatic subjects suggests that factors other than transient LES relaxation play an important role in the pathogenesis of GER disease.     

Effect of sumatriptan, a 5HT1 agonist, on the frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and gastroesophageal reflux in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE: Meals increase the rate of transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxations, in part by gastric distension. The 5HT1 agonist sumatriptan reduces fasting fundic tone, prolongs the meal-induced fundic relaxation, and delays gastric emptying. We therefore hypothesized that sumatriptan might have a significant effect on the rate of postprandial transient LES relaxations and gastroesophageal reflux. We aimed to study the effect of sumatriptan on postprandial transient LES relaxations and reflux in healthy subjects. METHODS: Esophageal manometry and pH monitoring were performed in 13 healthy volunteers for 30 min before and 90 min after a semiliquid meal (790 kcal). Sumatriptan 6 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) or s.c. placebo were administered on separate days 30 min after the meal. RESULTS: Sumatriptan significantly increased postprandial LES pressure from 11.0 +/- 1.2 mm Hg to 17.6 +/- 1.2 mm Hg (p < 0.05). However, reflux events were not diminished. In the contrary, reflux was more frequent after sumatriptan than after placebo (3 [1.5-4.5]/30 min vs 2 [0-3]/30 min, p < 0.05). Transient LES relaxations were more frequent after sumatriptan, particularly in the second 30-min period after drug administration (3 [2.5-5]/30 min vs 2 [1.5-2]/30 min, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sumatriptan prevents the natural decay in rate of transient LES relaxations that occurs after a meal and favors the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux despite increasing LES pressure. The sustained postprandial high rate of transient LES relaxations after sumatriptan may be a consequence of a prolonged fundus relaxation and retention of meal in the proximal stomach.     

下食管括约肌运动和功能与胃食管反流病

目的　观察胃食管反流病 (GERD)患者与对照组餐前、餐后食管pH情况 ,下食管括约肌(LES )运动模式的变化以及酸反流事件与一过性下食管括约肌松弛 (TLESR )、低LES压力 (LESP)的关系。方法　两组受试者均接受连续性 4h食管压力测定 (分别为空腹和餐后 1、2、3h)和食管pH监测 (GERD组检测 4h ,对照组检测 2 4h)。结果　GERD组酸反流事件明显高于对照组 (P <0 0 5 )。两组间TLESR发生率差异无显著性 (P >0 0 5 ) ,但与空腹比较 ,两组餐后 1h和 2hTLESR发生率明显增多 ;GERD组伴有酸反流的TLESR明显高于对照组 (P <0 0 0 1)。 4 3% (2 9/ 6 8)的酸反流事件发生在TLESR期间。 31% (2 1/ 6 8)的酸反流事件出现于低LESP状态中。结论　GERD是多因素参与的病理过程。LES运动形式变化和功能不全是GERD的重要背景因素。     

Relationship of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation to postprandial gastroesophageal reflux and belching in dogs

Methods have been developed for the recording of patterns of motor function associated with spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux and belching in trained, unsedated dogs. Pharyngeal, esophageal body, lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and gastric pressures were monitored in 3 dogs with a manometric assembly inserted through a cervical esophagostomy. Spontaneous changes in esophageal pH were recorded simultaneously with a glass electrode. Each dog was studied three times for 3 h starting directly after completion of a full-sized meal. Acid reflux was recorded on 40 occasions; on 35 of these occasions it was possible to analyze, in detail, motor events at the time of reflux. This analysis showed that the LES was completely relaxed at the time of reflux and that the relaxation occurred within the 15 s before the onset of esophageal acidification. In 77% of the reflux episodes LES relaxation occurred independently of swallowing or any other motor event. The remainder of the LES relaxations associated with reflux were secondary to a swallowing salvo or a single swallow that did not trigger an esophageal body peristaltic wave. Straining was associated with reflux during many episodes of LES relaxation, but did not induce reflux if there was measurable LES pressure. Belching was also related to complete LES relaxations with a pattern identical to that associated with acid reflux. In the dog, liquid and gas reflux occurred during transient LES relaxations that were very similar to those that allow reflux to occur in humans. The dog is a suitable model for investigation of the nature and control of reflux associated with transient LES relaxation.     

Esophageal motility abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Esophageal motility abnormalities are among the main factors implicated in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The recent introduction in clinical and research practice of novel esophageal testing has markedly improved our understanding of the mechanisms contributing to the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease, allowing a better management of patients with this disorder. In this context, the present article intends to provide an overview of the current literature about esophageal motility dysfunctions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal manometry, by recording intraluminal pressure, represents the gold standard to diagnose esophagealmotility abnormalities. In particular, using novel techniques, such as high resolution manometry with or without concurrent intraluminal impedance monitoring, transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxations, hypotensive LES, ineffective esophageal peristalsis and bolus transit abnormalities have been better defined and strongly implicated in gastroesophageal reflux disease development. Overall, recent findings suggest that esophageal motility abnormalities are increasingly prevalent with increasing severity of reflux disease, from nonerosive reflux disease to erosive reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus. Characterizing esophageal dysmotility among different subgroups of patients with reflux disease may represent a fundamental approach to properly diagnose these patients and, thus, to set up the best therapeutic management. Currently, surgery represents the only reliable way to restore the esophagogastric junction integrity and to reduce transient LES relaxations that are considered to be the predominant mechanism by which gastric contents can enter the esophagus. On that ground, more in depth future studies assessing the pathogenetic role of dysmotility in patients with reflux disease are warranted.     

Excess gastroesophageal reflux in patients with hiatus hernia is caused by mechanisms other than transient LES relaxations

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophageal acid exposure is higher in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with hiatus hernia than in those without. We investigated the effect of a sliding hiatus hernia on the mechanisms underlying spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux over 24 hours. METHODS: Twelve GERD patients with and 10 GERD patients without hiatus hernia were studied for 24 hours. Combined esophageal pH and manometric recordings of the pharynx, lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and stomach were performed using a multiple-lumen assembly incorporating a Dent sleeve connected to a portable water-perfused manometric system and a pH glass electrode. RESULTS: Patients with hiatus hernia had greater esophageal acid exposure (7.6% vs. 3.3%; P < 0.01) and more reflux episodes (3.1 vs. 1.8/h; P < 0.001) than those without. LES pressure, the incidence of transient LES relaxations (TLESRs), and the proportion of TLESRs associated with acid reflux were comparable in both groups. Both groups had equal numbers of reflux episodes associated with TLESRs and swallow-associated prolonged LES relaxations. Patients with hiatus hernia had more reflux associated with low LES pressure, swallow-associated normal LES relaxations, and straining during periods with low LES pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The excess reflux in GERD patients with hiatus hernia compared with those without is caused by malfunction of the gastroesophageal barrier during low LES pressure, swallow-associated normal LES relaxations, deep inspiration, and straining.     

Effect of intragastric volume and osmolality on mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE: Both transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxations (TLESRs) and periods of low/absent LES pressure (LESP) are the main mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux. These events are believed to be triggered by stimuli from different areas of the upper GI tract. We aimed at investigating the relationship between LESP profile and gastric emptying and distension after meals of different composition in 30 children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (median age 7.0 yr, range 12 months-12 yr). METHODS: Recordings of LESP and intraesophageal pH for 1 h fasting and for 2 postprandial h were performed with a perfused sleeve catheter and flexible electrode, respectively; gastric emptying and distension of antral area were simultaneously recorded with real-time ultrasonography. Ten patients had a standard meal (group A), 10 had a high-volume meal (group B), and 10 had a high-volume and osmolality meal (group C). RESULTS: Postprandial esophageal acid exposure was significantly higher in patients of groups B and C than in patients of group A (p < 0.01); it was also more prolonged in patients of group C than in subjects of group B (p < 0.05). A higher postfeeding rate of reflux episodes caused by TLESRs was detected in patients of groups B and C as compared with patients of group A (p < 0.01). This increase did not statistically differ in patients of groups B and C. Patients of group C exhibited a higher postprandial rate of reflux episodes associated with low/absent tone of the LES as well as a more prolonged gastric emptying time and a higher postfeeding gastric distension as compared with patients of groups A and B (p < 0.01). Finally, a significant correlation was only found between the postprandial rate of reflux events resulting from low/absent LESP and the degree of antral distension in patients of group C (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Gastroesophageal reflux is worsened by increasing the volume and osmolality of meals through significant changes of LESP. Meals of high volume and meals with high volume and osmolality cause a comparable increase of reflux episodes as a result of TLESRs. However, meals with high volume and osmolality cause the higher degrees of esophageal acid exposure than meals with high volume resulting from a higher rate of reflux episodes associated with low/absent LESP. This finding correlates with a high postfeeding antral distension.     

Impact of endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction on lower esophageal sphincter function and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease

OBJECTIVES: Plication of the gastroesophageal junction by endoscopic suturing has been reported to improve symptoms and reduce acid exposure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The mechanisms underlying these effects are not well defined. The aims of our study were to determine the impact of endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function in patients with GERD. METHODS: In 15 patients (7 males) with GERD (heartburn, % time esophageal pH < 4 greater than 4%, +/- history of erosive esophagitis within 6 months), two plications were performed circumferentially 1 cm below the gastroesophageal junction. Endoscopy and combined postprandial esophageal manometry and pH monitoring were performed before and 6 months after treatment; 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring and symptom assessment were also performed before, and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: Six months after treatment, the rate of transient LES relaxations (tLESRs) was decreased by 37% (p < 0.05) and basal LES pressure had increased from 4.3 +/- 2.2 mmHg to 6.2 +/- 2.1 mmHg (p < 0.05). The rate of postprandial reflux events and acid exposure time were not altered. Endoscopic suturing significantly reduced 24-h esophageal acid exposure from 9.6% (9.0-12.1) to 7.4% (3.9-10.1) at 6 months, due predominantly to a reduction in upright acid exposure. The reduction in total 24-h acid exposure was sustained to 12 months. At repeat endoscopy, only one plication was evident in 6 patients (40%) at 6 months. Seven patients (47%) remained off medications at 6 and 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GERD, endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction results in a reduction in the rate of tLESRs, and an increase in basal LES pressure. These changes in LES function result in only a modest reduction in gastroesophageal reflux.     

Intermittent spatial separation of diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter favors acidic and weakly acidic reflux

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In small hiatal hernias, the size of the hernia is variable. Intermittent complete reduction can be observed with high-resolution manometry as a transition from a double-peak (hernia) to a single-peak (reduced) high-pressure zone. The aim of this study was to investigate whether intermittent separation of the diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) favors the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux. METHODS: In 16 patients with a small hiatal hernia (3 cm), prolonged high-resolution manometry was performed. Acid and weakly acidic reflux episodes were detected with pH-impedance monitoring. RESULTS: The single pressure peak profile (reduced hernia) was present for 814 minutes (56.5% of total time), and the double peak profile (unreduced hernia) was present for 626 minutes (43.5% of total time). In all patients, both pressure profiles were observed. The transition rate between the 2 profiles was 7.5 +/- 0.9 per hour. More reflux occurred when the LES and diaphragm were separated versus the reduced hernia state (23.1 +/- 5.1 vs 12.2 +/- 2.4 episodes per hour, respectively; P < .05). The proportions of acidic reflux episodes during the single and double pressure peaks were similar (70% and 67%, respectively). In the two-pressure-zone state, there was an increase in all reflux mechanisms except transient LES relaxation. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a small hiatal hernia, intermittent reduction of the hernia occurs frequently. Spatial separation of the diaphragm and LES in the nonreduced state results in a 2-fold increase in acidic and weakly acidic reflux due to mechanisms other than transient LES relaxation.     

Transient Lower Esophageal Sphincter Relaxations and Gastroesophageal Reflux Episodes in Healthy Subjects and GERD Patients During 24 Hours

Still little is known about the 24-hr pattern of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs), particularly in patients with GERD. The aim of our study was to evaluate the 24-hr esophageal and LES motor pattern and esophageal pH and to identify the relationship between TLESRs and gastroesophageal reflux in healthy subjects and in GERD patients. Ten healthy subjects and nine patients with esophagitis (grade I–II) underwent a 24-hr pH manometric recording by means of a portable electronic device. The recording aimed at identifying the temporal relationships between reflux episodes and LES motor events. The GERD patients showed a greater number of either reflux episodes or TLESRs during the 24 hr as compared to controls. While most refluxes occurred during TLESRs in both groups, a small percentage of TLESRs was followed by reflux episodes in healthy people, with only a slight increase in GERD patients. In conclusion, although representing an important motor pattern during gastroesophageal reflux both in healthy subjects and in patients with GERD, TLESR could probably be considered one of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux more than the primary cause of reflux episodes.     

Relationship between straining, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, and gastroesophageal reflux in children

OBJECTIVE: Physical straining such as deep inspiration or coughing may induce gastroesophageal reflux (GER) by overcoming feeble lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. The role of straining as a provocant of GER has not been analyzed systematically in children. It was our aim to examine the contribution of straining to the occurrence of GER with particular attention to its relationship to transient LES relaxations, which are a major mechanism of the occurrence of GER in pediatric patients. METHODS: Concurrent esophageal manometry and pH monitoring was performed for 4 h postprandially in six children with esophagitis (age 9 months to 12 yr). Analysis was performed on isolated single strain episodes, defined as an increased intragastric pressure > 10 mm Hg. When a drop of esophageal pH < 4.0 was noted within 15 sec after any part of a strain, this strain was defined as related to the reflux episode. RESULTS: The median value of basal LES pressure was 10 mm Hg (range 1-18). In all, 134 analyzable strains and 87 analyzable reflux episodes were recorded. Isolated strains were associated with 20 reflux episodes (23%). Reflux was observed more frequently with strains that occurred during transient LES relaxations (12/40) than straining when the LES was contracted (8/94) (p < 0.01). Sustained strain (35%) and inspiratory strain (25%) were the major patterns of straining related to reflux. CONCLUSION: Straining provoked reflux infrequently and simultaneous occurrence of straining and transient LES relaxation was important in determining the occurrence of strain-related reflux in pediatric patients with reflux esophagitis.     

Abolition of gas reflux and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation by vagal blockade in the dog

In the present study we have examined the hypothesis that transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations are under vagal control. Fasting esophageal motor function was monitored with a manometric sleeve catheter passed via a cervical esophagostomy. Gastric insufflation with oxygen resulted in intermittent venting of gas into the esophagus during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations. Such venting of gas was associated with the occurrence of esophageal body common cavities and gas venting from the esophageal stoma, all of which increased with increasing rates of gastric insufflation. The optimal insufflation rate, 80 ml/min, produced stomal gas venting at a rate of 10.3 +/- 1.1/h (mean +/- SE). The time and pressure profiles of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations induced by gastric insufflation were similar to those relaxations seen with spontaneous postprandial gastroesophageal reflux and belching in dogs. Sphincteric relaxation started 10 s before the onset of common cavities. In all 4 dogs, cooling of cervical subcutaneous vagosympathetic loops abolished transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations, common cavities, and stomal gas venting. Within 1-4 min of cessation of vagal cooling, all three markers of gastroesophageal gas venting returned. Atropine, 50 and 200 micrograms/kg i.v., did not block transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations or gas reflux. Gastric gaseous distention is a potent and consistent trigger of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations in the dog. This effect can be used as a model for study of control mechanisms of transient sphincter relaxation-dependent gastroesophageal reflux. Our observations with this model indicate that transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations are under vagosympathetic control, but that muscarinic mechanisms are not important mediators of this control.     

Role of CCK(A) receptors in postprandial lower esophageal sphincter function in morbidly obese subjects

To reduce weight, some morbidly obese patients are treated with an intragastric balloon, often resulting in increased reflux symptoms. As transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the major mechanism underlying reflux and can be reduced by cholecystokinin-A (CCK_A) blockade, we hypothesized that the CCK_A-receptor antagonist loxiglumide could reduce gastroesophageal reflux in these subjects. Postprandial manometric studies were performed in 12 obese subjects during infusion of placebo or loxiglumide. Before balloon placement, loxiglumide did not significantly reduce the rate of TLESRs but attenuated the postprandial decrease in LES pressure. After 10 weeks of balloon treatment, loxiglumide significantly reduced the rate of TLESRs. Postprandial LES pressure was significantly increased, whereas the meal-induced decrease in LES pressure was absent. Neither loxiglumide nor balloon placement affected gastroesophageal reflux. In conclusion, CCK_A receptors play an important role in post-prandial LES pressure decrease and are involved in the reflex pathway underlying the triggering of TLESRs, at least after balloon placement.     

Radiofrequency energy delivery to the gastric cardia inhibits triggering of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and gastroesophageal reflux in dogs

BACKGROUND: Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the lower esophageal sphincter and gastric cardia is a new endoluminal technique proposed for the treatment of reflux disease. The mechanisms by which it achieves its effects are unclear. The study assessed the effect of radiofrequency energy delivery to the gastric cardia on the triggering of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and gastroesophageal reflux in dogs. METHODS: In 13 dogs, esophageal motility and pH were measured for 1 hour after a standard liquid meal and air infusion, as well as before and 3 months after radiofrequency energy treatment. At 7 months, histologic evaluation of the gastroesophageal junction was performed. RESULTS: Radiofrequency energy delivery reduced the frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations from 4.0 (3.0-6.75) (median [interquartile range]) per hour to 3.0 (2.0-3.0) per hour (p < 0.05). This was accompanied by a significant reduction in acid reflux episodes and esophageal acid exposure. Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and lower esophageal sphincter relaxation during swallowing were unchanged. There was a 63% increase in wall thickness at the gastric cardia compared with that in 2 control dogs, but no gross or histopathologic abnormalities of the esophageal or gastric mucosa. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency energy delivery to the gastric cardia in dogs inhibits the triggering of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and thereby reduces gastroesophageal reflux.     

Mechanisms underlying the antireflux action of fundoplication.

The effect of fundoplication on patterns of gastro-oesophageal reflux and the underlying motor mechanisms were investigated in 18 patients with symptomatic reflux. Oesophageal motility and pH were recorded concurrently after a standard meal. Studies were performed preoperatively and from 5 to 27 months after surgery. Fundoplication virtually eliminated reflux in all but three patients. Control of reflux was associated with a 50% fall in the number of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations, a fall in the proportion of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations accompanied by reflux from 47% to 17%, and an increase in the mean residual pressure at the gastro-oesophageal junction during swallow induced lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation from 0.7 mm Hg to 6.0 mm Hg. Basal pressure at the gastro-oesophageal junction rose from 10.9 mm Hg to 14.5 mm Hg, however, there was no correlation between postoperative reflux and basal gastro-oesophageal junction pressure. These findings suggest that the anti-reflux effects of fundoplication result from changes in the mechanical behaviour of the gastro-oesophageal junction that result in incomplete abolition of the high pressure zone during lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation, and reduced triggering of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations.     

Effect of prolonged gastric distention on lower esophageal sphincter function and gastroesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVES: Morbidly obese patients treated with an intragastric balloon report a transient increase in gastroesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms. In the present study, we evaluated the underlying mechanisms of GER and examined the effect of prolonged gastric distention on lower esophageal sphincter function. METHODS: Fasting and postprandial manometric studies were performed in obese subjects (n = 15) before, immediately after, and 10 and 20 wk after placement of a 500-ml water-filled balloon. RESULTS: Residual lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure after water swallows was not affected after balloon placement, excluding mechanical interaction with sleeve function. Postprandial LES pressure was significantly increased after 10 and 20 wk. GER was increased in the right recumbent position until 10 wk after balloon placement, mainly because of an increased percentage of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) accompanied by GER. TLESRs were the main mechanisms underlying reflux both before and after balloon placement. The rate of TLESRs was increased significantly immediately after introduction of the balloon, returning to baseline values after 20 wk. After balloon placement, reflux episodes were evoked by gastric contractions that were not inhibited by meals. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic distention by an intragastric balloon increased reflux up to 10 wk after placement because of an increase in the percentage of TLESRs accompanied by a reflux episode. In addition, prolonged balloon distention increased the rate of TLESRs and created a postprandial state even 10 wk after balloon placement. After 20 wk these effects largely resolved, illustrating adaptation to this artificial situation.     

Effects of Omeprazole on Mechanisms of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Childhood

Prolonged recordings of esophageal motility haveshown that dynamic changes of lower esophageal sphincter(LES) pressure such as transient LES relaxation and LESpressure drifts are the most common mechanisms underlying gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Thecoexistence of a delayed gastric emptying has also beenreported in a high proportion of patients with refluxdisease. However, not much information is available on the effects of antireflux therapy on thepathogenetic mechanisms of GER. The purpose of thisstudy was to determine in a group of children withsevere reflux disease the effect of omeprazole therapy on motor changes of LES underlying GER as wellas on gastric emptying time. Twenty-two children (medianage: 6.6 years) with GER disease, refractory to combinedranitidine and cisapride administration, entered into an eight-week omeprazole course.Ten subjects with moderate GER disease served ascontrols (median age: 6.0 years). Before and afteromeprazole administration, the following variables were assessed: esophagitis grading, fasting and fedsimultaneous prolonged recording of distal esophagealsphincter pressure (with a sleeve catheter) andintraesophageal pH, LES and esophageal peristalsisamplitude, and gastric emptying time of a mixedsolid-liquid meal (measured with gastric ultrasound). Ascompared to controls, patients showed a higher rate oftransient LES relaxation and LES pressure drift (P <0.01), a reduced amplitude of basal sphincter pressure(P < 0.01) and peristalsis (P < 0.05), and a moreprolonged gastric emptying time (P < 0.05). Afterending omeprazole, there was no significant change inany of the motor abnormalities of the esophagus and ingastric emptying time despite a marked improvement ofsymptoms and esophagitis in all patients. Sixteenpatients were symptomatic when reevaluated on a clinical basis two months after ending therapy. Weconclude that in children with severe GER disease, anabnormally high rate of both transient LES relaxationand LES pressure drift and slow gastric emptying are not affected by omperazole treatment, eventhough esophageal mucosal damage is markedly improved orcured. These abnormalities represent a primary motordisorder and can be implicated in the refractoriness of reflux disease.     

The role of excessive esophageal acid exposure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially reflux esophagitis (RE), is characterized by excessive esophageal acid exposure. Transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation is the major mechanism of acid reflux episodes in both healthy subjects (HS) and patients with GERD. In the sitting position, where acid reflux episodes often occur, there is no difference in the frequency of transient LES relaxations between these two groups; however, in patients with GERD, at 5 cm above the LES, the proportion of acid reflux episodes during transient LES relaxations is significantly greater than in the HS group. This difference is considered to be one of the causes of excessive esophageal acid exposure in patients with GERD, but its cause is still unclear. A recent study, which investigated the proportion of acid reflux episodes during transient LES relaxations at 2 and 7 cm above the LES, showed that there was no difference at 2 cm above the LES between HS and patients with RE, but at 7 cm they were significantly greater in patients with RE than in HS. Evaluation of acid reflux at 2 cm above the LES is difficult to measure, but the proximal extent of refluxate could be one of the important factors of excessive acid esophageal exposure in patients with RE. Ineffective esophageal motility, found in patients with moderate to severe RE, impairs esophageal bolus clearance of acid, therefore both the proximal extent of refluxate and the delay of esophageal bolus clearance of acid could be major causes of excessive esophageal acid exposure. Hiatus hernia also causes acid reflux, due to its association with hypotensive LES, and also impairs esophageal bolus clearance of acid.     

Upright versus supine reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Postural measures are early recommendations in the management of heartburn, and are aimed at preventing acid reflux through an incompetent lower esophageal sphincter (LES). However, LES incompetence is found in only a minority of patients, and transient LES relaxations, primarily in the upright position, are currently recognized as the main pathophysiological abnormality in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We investigated the importance of supine acid reflux in patients with GERD. METHODS: Upon review of their clinical, manometric, pH monitoring and endoscopic characteristics, 85 patients with reflux symptoms were classified into three groups: Group A (n=22), consisting of symptomatic patients without esophagitis or pathological reflux; group B (n=38), symptomatic patients with reflux but no endoscopic esophagitis; and group C (n=25), symptomatic patients with both ulcerative or complicated esophagitis and pathological reflux. RESULTS: All groups were similar in age distribution. Groups B and C had a higher prevalence of hiatal hernia and reflux symptoms. Manometry revealed similar LES pressures in groups A and B, but lower LES pressure in group C (P < 0.005). In groups A and B, supine reflux, in terms of percentage of time with pH < 4, was less pronounced than upright reflux (P < 0.0001). In contrast, group C supine reflux was as pronounced as the upright reflux. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients reflux in the upright position. Only patients with complicated esophagitis have significant bipositional acid reflux. These findings suggest that unless the patient has severe reflux disease, postural measures may not be indicated.