Pharmacokinetic interaction of sparfloxacin and digoxin

Sparfloxacin, a broad-spectrum, oral fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent, has a long elimination half-life that permits once-daily administration. Antibiotics may increase the oral bioavailability of digoxin, leading to increases in its plasma concentration. Since patients treated with sparfloxacin may be receiving concurrent treatment with digoxin, the possibility of an interaction between sparfloxacin and digoxin was examined in a double-masked, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, two-way crossover study in 24 healthy male volunteers between 20 and 49 years of age. All subjects were given digoxin 0.3 mg once daily throughout the 20-day study. Sparfloxacin (or placebo) was given as a 400-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by single 200-mg daily doses for 9 days, with crossover to the alternate treatment on days 11 through 20. Plasma levels of digoxin were analyzed by validated radioimmunoassay, and plasma levels of sparfloxacin were analyzed by validated high-performance liquid chromatography. Concomitant administration of sparfloxacin and digoxin was generally well tolerated. Mean values for steady-state area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours for the 2 treatments were virtually identical: 28.4 ng/h per mL(-1) for digoxin administered with placebo and 28.9 ng/h per mL(-1) for digoxin administered concomitantly with sparfloxacin. Mean steady-state maximum plasma concentrations were 3.91 and 3.59 ng/mL for digoxin with placebo and digoxin with sparfloxacin, respectively. Mean steady-state trough plasma digoxin concentrations for the 2 treatments were 0.87 and 0.89 ng/mL, respectively. Mean times to steady-state maximum plasma concentrations were identical at 0.89 hours for both treatments. Mean steady-state oral clearance was 10.6 L/h for digoxin alone and 10.4 L/h for digoxin with sparfloxacin. Thus administration of sparfloxacin in combination with digoxin did not alter the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy male volunteers aged 20 to 49 years. Steady-state plasma sparfloxacin concentrations were consistent with those obtained in other multiple-dose phase I studies, suggesting that digoxin does not alter the steady-state pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin.     

Oral bioavailability of digoxin is enhanced by talinolol: evidence for involvement of intestinal P-glycoprotein

OBJECTIVE: Recent data indicated that disposition of oral digoxin is modulated by intestinal P-glycoprotein. The cardioselective beta-blocker talinolol has been described to be secreted by way of P-glycoprotein into the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract after oral and intravenous administration. We therefore hypothesized that coadministration of digoxin and talinolol may lead to a drug-drug interaction based on a competition for intestinal P-glycoprotein. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics of digoxin (0.5 mg orally), talinolol (30 mg intravenously and 100 mg orally), and digoxin plus talinolol orally, as well as digoxin plus talinolol intravenously, were assessed in five male and five female healthy volunteers (age range, 23 to 30 years; body weight, 60 to 95 kg) in a changeover study with at least a 7-day washout period. Digoxin and talinolol were analyzed by fluorescence polarization immunoassay and HPLC, respectively. RESULTS: Oral coadministration of 100 mg talinolol increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 6 hours and the AUC from 0 to 72 hours of digoxin significantly by 18% and 23%, respectively (5.85+/-1.49 versus 7.22+/-1.29 ng x h/mL and 23.0+/-3.3 versus 27.1+/-3.7 ng x h/mL, for both P<.05) and the maximum serum levels by 45%. Renal clearance and half-life of digoxin remained unchanged. Coinfusion of 30 mg talinolol with oral digoxin had no significant effects on digoxin pharmacokinetics. Digoxin did not affect the disposition of talinolol after both oral and intravenous administration. CONCLUSION: We observed a significantly increased bioavailability of digoxin with oral coadministration of talinolol, which is most likely caused by competition for intestinal P-glycoprotein.     

Effect of grapefruit juice on digoxin pharmacokinetics in humans.

OBJECTIVES: Grapefruit juice is responsible for drug interactions mediated by intestinal cytochrome P4503A4 inhibition and possibly P-glycoprotein inhibition in enterocytes. Our main objective was to determine whether grapefruit juice alters the bioavailability of digoxin, a P-glycoprotein substrate. The secondary objective was to determine whether the magnitude of the pharmacokinetic interaction was influenced by P-glycoprotein genetic polymorphism. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers participated in this open randomized crossover study comparing the effect of grapefruit juice consumption (versus water) on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of digoxin (0.5 mg). The P-glycoprotein genotype was determined according to MDR1 genetic polymorphism in exon 26 (C3435T). RESULTS: Grapefruit juice had no significant effect on the maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)) of digoxin or the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to 48 hours. However, there was a 9% increase in the digoxin AUC from time zero to 4 hours and from time zero to 24 hours (P =.01) during grapefruit juice administration. The digoxin renal clearance remained unchanged during both periods. No relationship between MDR1 C3435T genotype and early digoxin pharmacokinetic changes could be detected. CONCLUSION: The modest changes in digoxin pharmacokinetics observed during grapefruit juice ingestion do not support an important P-glycoprotein inhibition. Under our experimental conditions, grapefruit juice-mediated P-glycoprotein inhibition does not appear to play a relevant role in drug interactions, at least when assessed by use of digoxin disposition kinetics.     

The role of intestinal P-glycoprotein in the interaction of digoxin and rifampin

Recent data point to the contribution of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) to digoxin elimination. On the basis of clinical observations of patients in whom digoxin levels decreased considerably when treated with rifampin, we hypothesized that concomitant rifampin therapy may affect digoxin disposition in humans by induction of P-gp. We compared single-dose (1 mg oral and 1 mg intravenous) pharmacokinetics of digoxin before and after coadministration of rifampin (600 mg/d for 10 days) in 8 healthy volunteers. Duodenal biopsies were obtained from each volunteer before and after administration of rifampin. The area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) of oral digoxin was significantly lower during rifampin treatment; the effect was less pronounced after intravenous administration of digoxin. Renal clearance and half-life of digoxin were not altered by rifampin. Rifampin treatment increased intestinal P-gp content 3.5 +/- 2.1-fold, which correlated with the AUC after oral digoxin but not after intravenous digoxin. P-gp is a determinant of the disposition of digoxin. Concomitant administration of rifampin reduced digoxin plasma concentrations substantially after oral administration but to a lesser extent after intravenous administration. The rifampin-digoxin interaction appears to occur largely at the level of the intestine. Therefore, induction of intestinal P-gp could explain this new type of drug-drug interaction.     

Dipyridamole enhances digoxin bioavailability via P-glycoprotein inhibition

BACKGROUND: On the basis of in vitro studies indicating that dipyridamole is an inhibitor for the MDR1 efflux membrane transporter P-glycoprotein, we postulated that dipyridamole could increase the bioavailability of digoxin, a P-glycoprotein substrate. OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to determine whether dipyridamole alters the bioavailability of digoxin. The secondary objective was to determine whether the magnitude of the pharmacokinetic interaction was influenced by MDR1 genetic polymorphism in exon 26 (C3435T). Material and methods: (1) The effect of dipyridamole on in vitro P-glycoprotein-mediated, polarized transport of tritium-labeled digoxin was investigated in Caco-2 cell monolayers. (2) Twelve healthy volunteers participated in this open, randomized, 2-period crossover study, in which the effects of dipyridamole (300 mg/d for 3 days) versus placebo on the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of digoxin (0.5 mg) were compared. MDR1 genotyping (exon 26, C3435T) was determined before the study to include 6 homozygous CC and 6 homozygous TT subjects. RESULTS: Dipyridamole inhibited [(3)H]digoxin transport in Caco-2 cells with a 50% inhibitory concentration value of 1.5 +/- 1.5 micromol/L. We observed a 20% and 13% increase in digoxin area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 4 hours and AUC from 0 to 24 hours (P <.05), respectively, during dipyridamole administration, which was consecutive to an increase in digoxin absorption. Digoxin AUC from 0 to 4 hours and AUC from 0 to 24 hours were significantly higher among subjects harboring the TT compared with the CC MDR1 genotype: 7.5 +/- 1.2 ng x h x mL(-1) versus 6.1 +/- 0.8 ng x h x mL(-1) and 20.2 +/- 2.1 ng x h x mL(-1) versus 16.8 +/- 1.7 ng x h x mL(-1), respectively (P <.05). Digoxin pharmacokinetic modifications during the dipyridamole period were similar in both genotypes. CONCLUSION: Dipyridamole is an in vitro and in vivo P-glycoprotein inhibitor that increases intestinal digoxin absorption and digoxin plasma concentrations. In light of the modest changes in digoxin pharmacokinetics in the presence of dipyridamole, this drug interaction is probably clinically irrelevant.     

Repaglinide pharmacokinetics in healthy young adult and elderly subjects.

In this open-label, single-center, pharmacokinetic study of repaglinide, 12 healthy volunteers (6 men, 6 women) were enrolled in each of 2 groups (total, 24 volunteers). One group consisted of young adult subjects (18 to 40 years), and the other group consisted of elderly subjects (> or = 65 years). On day 1, after a 10-hour fast, all 24 subjects received a single 2-mg dose of repaglinide. Starting on day 2 and continuing for 7 days, subjects received a 2-mg dose of repaglinide 15 minutes before each of 3 meals. On day 9, subjects received a single 2-mg dose of repaglinide. Pharmacokinetic profiles, including area under the curve, maximum concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax, and half-life, were determined at completion of the single-dose and multiple-dose regimens (days 1 and 9, respectively). Trough repaglinide values were collected on days 2 through 7 to assess steady state. The single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic variables of serum repaglinide were not significantly different between young adult and elderly subjects. Repaglinide was well tolerated in both groups. Hypoglycemic events occurred in 5 young adult and 5 elderly subjects. This study demonstrates that the pharmacokinetics of repaglinide are similar in healthy young adult and elderly subjects.     

Pharmacokinetic interaction of digoxin with an herbal extract from St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum).

OBJECTIVE: Extracts of St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) are widely used in the treatment of depression, often as an over-the-counter drug. In contrast to its frequent use, knowledge about the pharmacokinetics of ingredients and drug interactions of St John's wort is poor. We studied the interaction between hypericum extract LI160 and digoxin. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of digoxin were investigated in a single-blind, placebo-controlled parallel study. After the achievement of steady state for digoxin on day 5, healthy volunteers received digoxin (0.25 mg/d) either with placebo (n = 12) or with 900 mg/d LI160 (n = 13) for another 10 days. Digoxin concentration profiles on day 5 were compared with day 6 (single-dose interaction) and day 15 (tenth day of co-medication). RESULTS: There was a highly significant combined-day-and-group effect for digoxin area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(0-24); P = .0001], peak concentration in plasma (Cmax; P = .0001), and plasma drug concentration at the end of a dosing interval (P = .0003) by two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant change was observed after the first dose of hypericum extract [AUC(0-24) at day 6 of 18.1+/-2.9 microg x h/L and 17.7+/-3.0 microg x h/L, mean +/- SD for placebo and hypericum group, respectively]. However, 10 days of treatment with hypericum extract resulted in a decrease of digoxin AUC(0-24) by 25% (day 15, 17.2+/-4.0 microg x h/L and 12.9+/-2.3 microg x h/L; P = .0035). Furthermore, comparison with the parallel placebo group after multiple dosing showed a reduction in trough concentrations and Cmax of 33% (P = .0023) and 26% (P = .0095), respectively. The effect became increasingly pronounced until the tenth day of co-medication. CONCLUSION: As with grapefruit juice, a food product, physicians should also be aware of potential drug-herb interactions. The interaction of St John's wort extract with digoxin kinetics was time dependent. The mechanism involved may be induction of the P-glycoprotein drug transporter.     

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime after single and multiple intravenous administrations in healthy subjects.

The pharmacokinetics of cefepime in 31 young, healthy volunteers were assessed after the administration of single and multiple 250-, 500-, 1,000-, or 2,000-mg intravenous doses. Each subject received a single dose of cefepime via a 30-min intravenous infusion on day 1 of the study. Starting from day 2, subjects received multiple doses of cefepime every 8 h for 9 days, and on the morning of day 11, they received the last dose. Serial blood and urine samples were collected after administration of the first dose and on days 1, 6, and 11. Cefepime concentrations in plasma and urine were assayed by using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Data were evaluated by noncompartmental methods to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. The mean half-life of cefepime was approximately 2 h and did not vary with the dose or duration of dosing. The regression analyses of peak levels (Cmax) in plasma at the end of the 30-min intravenous infusion and the area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUCo-infinity) showed a dose-proportional response. The steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) was approximately 18 liters and was independent of the administered dose. The multiple-dose pharmacokinetic data are suggestive of a lack of accumulation or change in clearance of cefepime on repeated dosing. Cefepime was excreted primarily unchanged in urine. The recovery of intact cefepime in urine was invariant with respect to the dose and accounted for over 80% of the dose. The values for renal clearance ranged from 99 to 132 ml/min and were suggestive of glomerular filtration as the primary excretion mechanism. It is concluded that cefepime linear pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.     

Role of human MDR1 gene polymorphism in bioavailability and interaction of digoxin,a substrate of P-glycoprotein

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to quantitate the contribution of the genetic polymorphism of the human MDR1 gene to the bioavailability and interaction profiles of digoxin, a substrate of P-glycoprotein. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of digoxin was studied in 15 healthy volunteers, who were divided into 3 groups (n = 5 each) on the basis of genotyping for the MDR1 gene, in a 4-dose study after single doses of digoxin alone (0.5 mg orally and intravenously) and coadministered with clarithromycin (400 mg orally for 8 days). The dose of digoxin was reduced during the clarithromycin phase (0.25 mg orally and intravenously). RESULTS: The bioavailability of digoxin in G/G2677C/C3435, G/T2677C/T3435, and T/T2677T/T3435 subjects were 67.6% +/- 4.3%, 80.9% +/- 8.9%, and 87.1% +/- 8.4%, respectively, and the difference between G/G2677C/C3435 and T/T2677T/T3435 subjects was statistically significant (P <.05). The MDR1 variants were also associated with differences in disposition kinetics of digoxin, with the renal clearance being almost 32% lower in T/T2677T/T3435 subjects (1.9 +/- 0.1 mL/min per kilogram) than G/G2677C/C3435 subjects (2.8 +/- 0.3 mL/min per kilogram), and G/T2677C/T3435 subjects having an intermediate value (2.1 +/- 0.6 mL/min per kilogram). Coadministration of clarithromycin did not consistently affect digoxin clearance or renal clearance. However, a significant increase in digoxin bioavailability was observed in G/G2677C/C3435 subjects (67.6% +/- 4.3% versus 85.4% +/- 6.1%; P <.05) but not in the other 2 genotype groups. CONCLUSION: The allelic variants in the human MDR1 gene are likely to be associated with altered absorption and/or disposition profiles of digoxin and P-glycoprotein-mediated drug interaction     

Unexpected effect of verapamil on oral bioavailability of the beta-blocker talinolol in humans

PURPOSE: To quantitate the effect of verapamil administered orally, a calcium channel blocker and potent inhibitor of P-glycoprotein on oral pharmacokinetics of the beta1-adrenergic receptor antagonist talinolol, a substrate of P-glycoprotein. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, crossover placebo-controlled study, oral pharmacokinetics of talinolol (50 mg) after concomitant administration of single doses of R-verapamil (120 mg) or placebo were investigated in 9 healthy volunteers. Concentrations of talinolol, verapamil, and its main metabolite norverapamil were measured in serum with HPLC. Concentrations of talinolol were also measured in urine by HPLC. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with noncompartmental procedures. RESULTS: The area under the concentration-time curve for talinolol from 0 to 24 hours was significantly decreased after R-verapamil versus placebo (721+/-231 ng x h x mL(-1) versus 945+/-188 ng x h x mL(-1); P < .01). Maximum serum concentration of talinolol was reached significantly earlier after R-verapamil compared with placebo (P < .05). Coadministration of R-verapamil did not affect the renal clearance or half-life of talinolol. Serum pharmacokinetics are paralleled by the results derived from urine concentrations of talinolol. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show a decreased oral bioavailability of a P-glycoprotein substrate (talinolol) in humans as a result of coadministration of verapamil. This effect is assumed to be caused by changes of the intestinal net absorption of talinolol because its renal clearance remains unaffected by administration of R-verapamil. This unexpected effect of R-verapamil is most likely dose dependent as a result of an interplay between intestinal P-glycoprotein and gut metabolism.     

Mefloquine kinetics in cured and recrudescent patients with acute falciparum malaria and in healthy volunteers

Mefloquine pharmacokinetics were compared in a randomized clinical trial in Thailand among patients with malaria and healthy volunteers. A single oral dose of 1500 mg mefloquine hydrochloride was administered to 11 patients and 5 volunteers and 750 mg was given to 16 patients and 5 volunteers. Efficacy was 82% for 1500 mg and 63% for 750 mg. In cured patients taking 750 mg mefloquine, peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were significantly greater than in the patients for whom treatment failed (p less than 0.0005 and p less than 0.01, respectively), and plasma mefloquine levels were significantly higher from 8 hours to 18 days after treatment. Mefloquine AUC was reduced and variable in the presence of diarrhea. Compared with noninfected volunteers, clinically ill patients displayed a delayed time to reach peak concentration (p less than 0.01) and significantly higher mefloquine plasma levels in the first 2 days after administration of either the 750 mg or the 1500 mg dose. Mefloquine AUC was similar in patients with malaria and healthy volunteers. Because plasma levels increased in temporal relationship with clinical illness, mefloquine volume of distribution or clearance (or both) was reduced during the acute phase of illness.     

Evaluation of potential losartan-phenytoin drug interactions in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND: Phenytoin, a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 substrate, has a narrow therapeutic index and nonlinear pharmacokinetics. Therefore there is the potential for significant concentration-related adverse effects when phenytoin is coadministered with other CYP2C9 substrates. Losartan, an antihypertensive agent, is also a substrate for CYP2C9. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the effects of losartan on the pharmacokinetics of phenytoin and the effects of phenytoin on the pharmacokinetics of losartan in a healthy population of volunteers. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, 3-period crossover study was conducted in 16 healthy volunteers with phenytoin alone, phenytoin in combination with losartan, and losartan alone. Each treatment was given for 10 days with a 3-week washout period between treatments. On day 10, plasma concentrations of phenytoin and plasma and urine concentrations of losartan and its active carboxylic-acid metabolite E3174 were measured to determine steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: Coadministration of losartan had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of phenytoin. Coadministration of phenytoin increased the mean area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours [AUC(0-24)] of losartan by 17% (355 +/- 220 ng x h/mL versus 427 +/- 177 ng x h/mL; P =.1), but this difference was not statistically significant. In the 14 CYP2C9*1/*1 subjects, the mean AUC(0-24) of losartan was increased by 29% (284 +/- 84 ng x h/mL versus 402 +/- 128 ng x h/mL; P =.008). Coadministration of phenytoin significantly reduced the AUC(0-24) of E3174 by 63% (1254 +/- 256 ng x h/mL versus 466 +/- 174 ng x h/mL; P =.0001) and the formation clearance of losartan to E3174 (1.91 +/- 0.8 mL/h per kilogram versus 0.62 +/- 0.4 mL/h per kilogram; P =.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Losartan, a CYP2C9 substrate, had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of phenytoin. However, phenytoin inhibited the CYP2C9-mediated conversion of losartan to E3174.     

Lack of mutual pharmacokinetic interaction between cerivastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, and digoxin in healthy normocholesterolemic volunteers.

The potential mutual interaction between cerivastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, and digoxin was assessed in this nonmasked, nonrandomized, multiple-dose study. The effect of cerivastatin 0.2 mg on mean plasma digoxin levels and the effect of digoxin on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin were assessed in 20 healthy normocholesterolemic men between 18 and 45 years of age weighing 140 to 200 lbs (63.3 to 90.0 kg). Subjects were given a single dose of cerivastatin 0.2 mg. After a 2-day washout period, subjects were given a loading dose of digoxin 0.5 mg for 3 days followed by 0.25 mg daily for 5 additional days (period 1-digoxin alone). Concurrent dosing with cerivastatin 0.2 mg continued for 14 days (period 2-digoxin and cerivastatin), followed by an 8-day course of digoxin-only administration and an optional 6-day extension of digoxin-only treatment for a total of 14 days (period 3). Safety was assessed through physical examination, electrocardiography, laboratory tests, and ophthalmologic examination. Ratio analyses of mean digoxin plasma trough levels, 24-hour urinary digoxin levels, and digoxin clearance with and without concurrent cerivastatin dosing also were carried out. In addition, single-dose pharmacokinetic variables for cerivastatin, including area under the curve (AUC(0-24)), peak concentration (C(max)), time to peak concentration (T(max)), and elimination half-life (t1/2), were examined with and without concurrent digoxin dosing. Eleven of the 20 subjects completed the entire study. Seven subjects discontinued the study because of treatment-emergent adverse events or laboratory abnormalities that were mostly unrelated to cerivastatin, and 2 subjects were discontinued because of protocol violations. Treatment-emergent adverse events developed in 12 subjects receiving cerivastatin; 11 of these subjects were receiving digoxin concurrently. Six adverse events that led to discontinuation of treatment were unrelated to cerivastatin but were related to digoxin or to a preexisting condition. The most commonly reported event was headache, which occurred with equal frequency compared with placebo groups in large cerivastatin clinical trials. Other events were mild or moderate and resolved without intervention. Mild and transient elevations in hepatic transaminase and creatine kinase values (all <2 times the upper limit of normal) were observed in 7 subjects. After 14 days of concurrent dosing of cerivastatin and digoxin, steady-state digoxin plasma levels, urinary digoxin levels, and urinary digoxin clearance were unchanged compared with steady-state digoxin levels when digoxin was given alone. Compared with dosing with digoxin alone, the AUC(0-24), Cmax, and t1/2 for cerivastatin increased 3%, 20%, and 7%, respectively, while the T(max) was reduced by 18% during concurrent treatment with digoxin. These changes are minimal and would not be expected to be clinically relevant. These results demonstrate that when cerivastatin is administered concurrently with digoxin, neither digoxin nor cerivastatin plasma levels are altered. The combination therapy was generally well tolerated.     

Pharmacokinetic interaction between amprenavir and clarithromycin in healthy male volunteers

The P450 enzyme, CYP3A4, extensively metabolizes both amprenavir and clarithromycin. To determine if an interaction exists when these two drugs are coadministered, the pharmacokinetics of amprenavir and clarithromycin were investigated in healthy adult male volunteers. This was a Phase I, open-label, randomized, balanced, multiple-dose, three-period crossover study. Fourteen subjects received the following three regimens: amprenavir, 1,200 mg twice daily over 4 days (seven doses); clarithromycin, 500 mg twice daily over 4 days (seven doses); and the combination of the above regimens over 4 days (seven doses of each drug). Twelve subjects completed all treatments and the follow-up period. The erythromycin breath test (ERMBT) was administered at baseline, 2 h after the final dose of each of the three regimens and at the first follow-up visit. Coadministration of clarithromycin and amprenavir significantly increased the mean amprenavir AUC(ss), C(max,ss), and C(min,ss) by 18, 15, and 39%, respectively. Amprenavir had no significant effect on the AUC(ss) of clarithromycin, but the median T(max,ss)for clarithromycin increased by 2.0 h, renal clearance increased by 34%, and the AUC(ss) for 14-(R)-hydroxyclarithromycin decreased by 35% when it was given with amprenavir. Amprenavir and clarithromycin reduced the ERMBT result by 85 and 67%, respectively, and by 87% when the two drugs were coadministered. The baseline ERMBT value did not correlate with clearance of amprenavir or clarithromycin. A pharmacokinetic interaction occurs when amprenavir and clarithromycin are coadministered, but the effects are not likely to be clinically important, and coadministration does not require a dosage adjustment for either drug.     

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between gemifloxacin and digoxin in healthy elderly volunteers

Gemifloxacin is a novel fluoroquinolone with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity. The objective of this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover study was to demonstrate the lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between gemifloxacin and digoxin. During two 14-day treatment periods, healthy elderly volunteers received digoxin (0.25 mg, once daily) co-administered on days 8-14 with either gemifloxacin (320 mg, p.o., once daily) or placebo. On day 14 of each period, blood samples and urine were collected for 24 h post dose and analysed for digoxin levels by radioimmunoassay. Steady-state digoxin pharmacokinetics were not affected by multiple dosing with gemifloxacin. There was no significant difference in digoxin values for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval 0-24 h (AUC((0-24))) or the trough plasma concentration (C24) after co-administration with either gemifloxacin or placebo. Geometric means for AUC((0-24)) and C24 were 18.1 and 17.8 ng x h/ml and 0.597 and 0.566 ng/ml, respectively. The point estimates (90% confidence intervals) for AUC((0-24)) and C24 (digoxin + gemifloxacin):(digoxin + placebo) were 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) and 1.05 (0.95, 1.16), respectively, entirely within the equivalence range (0.80, 1.25). There were no marked differences between co-administration regimens for maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) or renal clearance values. Gemifloxacin was well tolerated during co-administration with digoxin, and the incidence of adverse events was similar to that seen with placebo. There were no clinically relevant changes in vital signs, electrocardiogram readings or laboratory parameters. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that gemifloxacin may be co-administered with digoxin without the need for digoxin dose adjustment. Copyright Copyright 1999 S.Karger AG, Basel.     

Pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic effect of ebastine in young versus elderly healthy subjects

The objective of this study was to compare the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic effect of a 10-mg oral dose of ebastine in elderly (ages, 65-85 years) and young (ages, 18-35 years) healthy volunteers. Thirty-seven subjects completed this randomized, double-blind, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. The elderly group consisted of 18 subjects, with 13 subjects receiving 10 mg ebastine and 5 receiving matching placebo. The young group consisted of 19 subjects, with 13 subjects receiving 10 mg ebastine and 6 receiving matching placebo. On study days 1 and 3 through 10, each subject received a single 10-mg dose of ebastine or matching placebo in the morning with a standard breakfast. No drug was administered on study day 2 because of pharmacokinetic sampling. Blood samples were collected at selected times postdose on study days 1, 2, and 10. Plasma samples were analyzed for ebastine and its active metabolite, carebastine, using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. No plasma ebastine concentrations were detected, suggesting essentially complete metabolic conversion of ebastine to its metabolites. Analysis of variance showed no statistically significant differences between young and elderly single- and multiple-dose carebastine pharmacokinetics with respect to area under the plasma concentration-time curve, maximum concentration (Cmax ), terminal elimination rate constant, apparent oral clearance, or apparent volume of distribution. The mean time of maximum concentration value for young subjects was 1 hour longer than that for elderly subjects after single-dose administration but was comparable after multiple-dose administration. Within-group comparisons of both the young and elderly showed that pharmacokinetics between single dose and steady state were not statistically different. However, the mean steady-state carebastine Cmax values were approximately twofold greater than the mean Cmax values obtained after single-dose administration. A twofold increase in Cmax values between single-dose and steady-state administration is predicted for drugs such as carebastine, because its input interval is approximately equal to its elimination half-life. Twelve-lead electrocardiography was performed before dosing on day 1 and repeated 4 hours postdose on days 1, 5, and 10. Twenty-four hour Holter monitoring was also performed before and at the end of the study. No clinically relevant findings were found by electrocardiography or Holter monitoring between ebastine and placebo in the elderly and young subjects.     

Substantial pharmacokinetic interaction between digoxin and ritonavir in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND: Ritonavir is a potent in vitro inhibitor of several cytochrome P450 isozymes and ABC transporters including the efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp). This study assessed the effect of repetitive ritonavir administration on digoxin distribution and total and renal digoxin clearance as a marker for P-gp activity in vivo. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, 12 healthy male participants received oral ritonavir (300 mg twice daily) for 11 days. With the assumption that ritonavir steady state had been reached, 0.5 mg digoxin was given intravenously on day 3. Digoxin concentrations were determined in plasma and urine by radioimmunoassay, and plasma ritonavir concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Digoxin kinetics was estimated by compartmental and noncompartmental analyses, by use of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, and the corresponding digoxin amount excreted into urine was used for digoxin clearance calculations. RESULTS: Ritonavir significantly (P <.01) increased digoxin area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity by 86% and its volume of distribution by 77% and decreased nonrenal and renal digoxin clearance by 48% and 35%, respectively. Digoxin terminal half-life in plasma increased by 156% (P <.01). CONCLUSION: This inhibition of renal digoxin clearance is likely caused by ritonavir inhibition of P-gp. Its extent is considerable and similar to the effect of other potent P-gp inhibitors on digoxin disposition such as quinidine. These findings may, therefore, indicate that the pharmacokinetics of P-gp substrates sharing the renal tubular elimination pathway will be affected when combined with therapeutic doses of ritonavir in antiretroviral treatment regimens. In addition and contrarily to quinidine, these data indicate that ritonavir promotes digoxin distribution in the body.     

Absence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between digoxin and levofloxacin

BACKGROUND: Levofloxacin, a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone, may enhance digoxin bioavailability by eliminating intestinal flora that metabolize digoxin. Moreover, levofloxacin, which is eliminated primarily by glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion, may alter the elimination rate of digoxin. Because of the narrow therapeutic index of digoxin, it is important to evaluate the potential for interaction with levofloxacin when administered concomitantly. METHODS: This was a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, two-phase crossover study. Twelve healthy subjects (six males and six females) received 500 mg twice/day oral doses of levofloxacin or placebo for 6 days and a single oral dose of 0.4 mg digoxin on the morning of study day 5 along with levofloxacin or placebo. RESULTS: There was no significant effect of levofloxacin on the pharmacokinetics (Cmax, AUC, and other disposition parameters) of oral digoxin. Steady-state levofloxacin absorption and disposition kinetics were also similar in the presence or absence of digoxin. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that an important pharmacokinetic interaction between levofloxacin and digoxin is unlikely to occur when administered concomitantly.     

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and excretion balance of gatifloxacin,a new fluoroquinolone antibiotic,following oral administration to healthy Caucasian volunteers

The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and excretion balance of gatifloxacin were evaluated in 42 healthy Caucasian volunteers. Following multiple oral doses of 400 and 600 mg, the pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin were similar on days 1 and 15, suggesting no therapeutically relevant time-dependent changes in the pharmacokinetics of gatifloxacin at the doses and duration of dosing studied. Gatifloxacin was rapidly absorbed and a favourable elimination half-life of 7-8 h was evaluated. Saliva concentrations were similar to plasma concentrations. The main route of excretion is the urine. After a single dose of 400 mg of gatifloxacin, the recovery in urine was 83% and 5.2% in faeces. Following multiple doses of 400 or 600 mg, the renal excretion was 80 and 77%, respectively. The drug was well tolerated.