Drug-induced anaphylaxis : case/non-case study based on an italian pharmacovigilance database.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the number of cases of anaphylaxis reported in association with different classes of drugs and compare it with other reports contained in the same database. METHODS: The data were obtained from a database containing all of the spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) coming from the Italian regions of Emilia Romagna, Lombardy and the Veneto, which are the main contributors to the Italian spontaneous surveillance system. The ADRs reported between January 1990 and December 2003 with a causality assessment of certainly, probably or possibly drug related (according to the WHO criteria) were analysed using a case/non-case design. The cases were defined as the reactions already coded by the WHO preferred terms of 'anaphylactic shock' or 'anaphylactoid reaction' (this last term also included anaphylactic reaction) and those with a time of event onset that suggested an allergic reaction and involved at least two of the skin, respiratory, gastrointestinal, CNS or cardiovascular systems; the non-cases were all of the other ADR reports. The frequency of the association between anaphylaxis and the suspected drug in comparison with the frequency of anaphylaxis associated to all of the other drugs was calculated using the ADR reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a measure of disproportionality. RESULTS: Our database contained 744 cases (including 307 cases of anaphylactic shock with 10 deaths) and 27 512 non-cases. The percentage of anaphylaxis cases reported in inpatients was higher than that among outpatients (59.1% vs 40.9%). This distribution is significantly different from that of the other ADR reports that mainly refer to outpatients. After intravenous drug administrations, anaphylactic shock cases were more frequent than anaphylactoid reactions or other ADRs, but more than one-third of these reactions were caused by an oral drug. Blood substitutes and radiology contrast agents had the highest RORs. Among the systemic antibacterial agents, anaphylaxis was disproportionally reported more often for penicillins, quinolones, cephalosporins and glycopeptides, but diclofenac was the only NSAID with a significant ROR. As a category, vaccines had a significantly lower ROR, thus indicating that anaphylaxis is reported proportionally less than other ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylaxis is a severe ADR that may also occur with commonly used drugs. It represents 2.7% of all of the ADRs reported in an Italian spontaneous reporting database.     

Incidence of allergic reactions associated with antibacterial use in a large, managed care organisation.

BACKGROUND: Data on the incidence of serious allergic reactions to fluoroquinolone antibacterials are mainly derived from spontaneous reports that cannot be used to accurately estimate incidence. METHODS: This study estimated the drug-specific incidence of serious allergic reactions after fluoroquinolone, cephalosporin and phenoxymethylpenicillin potassium exposure, using claims for healthcare services with confirmation through medical record abstraction within a large health insurer database. Cohorts exposed to each antibacterial of interest (moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, cephalosporins and penicillin) were identified, and followed for 14 days for anaphylaxis (9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases [ICD-9] code 995.0), other allergic drug reactions (ICD-9 995.2, 995.3) or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. RESULTS: The incidence per 10,000 first dispensings of any allergic diagnosis made in the hospital or emergency department was similar for moxifloxacin (4.3; 95% CI 3.5, 5.3), penicillin (4.7; 95% CI 3.8, 5.7) and ciprofloxacin (5.4; 95% CI 4.4, 6.5). The incidence for moxifloxacin was lower than that for levofloxacin (8.7; 95% CI 7.4, 10.0), gatifloxacin (6.7; 95% CI 5.6, 7.9) and the cephalosporins (7.5; 95% CI 6.3, 8.8). The incidence of anaphylaxis/anaphylactoid reactions after first dispensings was similar for the fluoroquinolones: 0.1 (95% CI 0.0, 0.3) for ciprofloxacin, 0.3 (95% CI 0.1, 0.5) for moxifloxacin, 0.3 (95% CI 0.1, 0.6) for gatifloxacin and 0.5 (95% CI 0.3, 0.9) for levofloxacin; and comparable with that of the cephalosporins (0.2; 95% CI 0.0, 0.4) and penicillin (0.1; 95% CI 0.0, 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylactic reactions were rare and their incidence did not differ substantially among the drug groups studied. By determining the occurrence of reactions following defined exposures, these results provide a context for the interpretation of spontaneous reports of allergic reactions.     

Effect of fluoroquinolone expenditures on susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin in U.S. hospitals.

The effect of fluoroquinolone use on the susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to fluoroquinolones in U.S. hospitals was studied. Benchmarking surveys were sent annually to pharmacists practicing in U.S. hospitals from 1993 to 1999. Data collected included hospital characteristics, antimicrobial expenditures and use, antimicrobial stewardship activities, and bacterial susceptibilities. Antimicrobial expenditures were normalized for the number of occupied beds (OBs) per year. General linear modeling and repeated-measures mixed-effects modeling were used to determine factors predictive of P. aeruginosa susceptibility to fluoroquinolones. A total of 174 hospitals provided data for fluoroquinolone expenditures and susceptibility of P. aeruginosa; the median number of years of data was 3 (range, 1-6), representing 416 hospital years. Community hospitals contributed a majority of the data. Median fluoroquinolone expenditures increased gradually from $230 per OB in 1993 to $400 per OB in 1998. A 55% increase to $620 per OB occurred in 1999, largely because of increased spending on levofloxacin. Susceptibility to ciprofloxacin was commonly used to assess fluoroquinolone susceptibility. The median susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin decreased from 84% to 71%. Increasing expenditures for ofloxacin and levofloxacin, but not ciprofloxacin, were associated with decreasing P. aeruginosa susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. In the final multivariable model, each study year after 1993 and every increase in ofloxacin expenditure of $100 per OB were associated with decreases in P. aeruginosa susceptibility. Data from a benchmarking survey of U.S. hospitals for 1993-1999 revealed increases in levofloxacin expenditures, total fluoroquinolone expenditures, expenditures for nonfluoroquinolone antipseudomonal antimicrobials, and total antimicrobial expenditures in 1999. Increases in expenditures for levofloxacin and ofloxacin were associated with a significant decrease in P. aeruginosa susceptibility to ciprofloxacin.     

Levofloxacin

Levofloxacin (DR-3355, Daiichi) is a new fluoroquinolone antibiotic which is the active isomer of ofloxacin (DL-8280, Daiichi). By removing the inactive isomer, the in vitro activity of levofloxacin is 8-128 times higher than that of ofloxacin. This means that bacterial species, which have borderline susceptibility to ofloxacin and other first generation fluoroquinolones (e.g., pneumococci and organisms causing atypical pneumonia), are considerably more sensitive to levofloxacin. The pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin, which is available for both oral and i.v. administration, are characterised by a very high bioavailability, low (30-40%) protein binding, high tissue concentrations and elimination via the kidneys with minimal liver metabolism. As a consequence of the low degree of metabolism, levofloxacin does not interact with other drugs to any major extent. The safety and efficacy of levofloxacin are well documented in lower respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and urinary tract infections. The safety profile seems advantageous and the risks of phototoxicity, CNS toxicity and cardiac reactions (prolongation of QT-time) are low. Serious liver toxicity, leading to the recent withdrawal of trovafloxacin, has not been a problem in levofloxacin studies. Levofloxacin is a valuable addition to the group of fluoroquinolone antibiotics.     

氟喹诺酮类药物不良反应分析

目的探讨氟喹诺酮类药物的合理使用。方法对我院2010年1月～2011年12月间126例氟喹诺酮类药物不良反应报告进行回顾性分析,对不良反应的发生情况进行分类汇总,并对所采取救治措施进行总结。结果氟喹诺酮类药物不良反应中左氧氟沙星和氟罗沙星所占比例最高,给药方式中静脉滴注给药所占比例最高,各种不良反应中以过敏反应最为多见。结论应密切关注氟喹诺酮类药物使用过程中可能出现的不良反应,采取必要的防治措施,确保用药的安全性和有效性。     

Comparative in vitro activity of gemifloxacin to other fluoroquinolones and non-quinolone agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States in 1999-2000

This study was undertaken to assess the in vitro activity of gemifloxacin, five other fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents (ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and ofloxacin) and other non-quinolone comparator agents (ampicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, doxycycline, penicillin and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole) against Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in the United States. Susceptibility testing of 550 S. pneumoniae, 290 Haemophilus influenzae and 205 Moraxella catarrhalis showed that 38.2% of pneumococci were penicillin nonsusceptible, while 26.2 and 95.6% of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, respectively, produced beta-lactamase. Overall new fluoroquinolones were the most active agents. The in vitro activity (based on MIC90 in mg/l) of the six fluoroquinolones was gemifloxacin>moxifloxacin>gatifloxacin>levofloxacin>ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin.     

Influence of fluoroquinolone purchasing patterns on antimicrobial expenditures and Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility.

The influence of using ofloxacin in place of ciprofloxacin on hospital fluoroquinolone expenditures, total antimicrobial expenditures, and susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to fluoroquinolones was studied. Hospitals with fluoroquinolone expenditures of at least $1 per occupied bed per year were administered annual surveys covering the years 1993 through 1996. The two most recent consecutive years of data were compared among hospitals that used ciprofloxacin as their primary fluoroquinolone during both years (group 1), hospitals whose ofloxacin purchases increased from accounting for < or =25% of total fluoroquinolone expenditures during year 1 to accounting for >25% during year 2 (group 2), and hospitals whose ofloxacin purchases accounted for at least 25% of total fluoroquinolone expenditures for both years (group 3). A total of 109 hospitals were included in the study. Most hospitals spent more on fluoroquinolones and total antimicrobials in year 2 than year 1. Group 3 hospitals had a significant increase in expenditures for fluoroquinolones and non-fluoroquinolone antipseudomonal antimicrobials. Group 2 hospitals did not realize antimicrobial cost savings and had higher rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance than hospitals that used ciprofloxacin. Whether a hospital changed its pattern of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin purchasing was not significantly associated with expenditures for fluoroquinolones, nonfluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents, or all antimicrobials. Susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin was lower in hospitals with greater proportions of ofloxacin use. Individual hospital, ciprofloxacin expenditures, and study year were found to be predictive of P. aeruginosa susceptibility to ciprofloxacin among all pooled hospitals.     

Glafenine-associated anaphylaxis as a cause of hospital admission in the Netherlands

Summary In 1981 generalized anaphylaxis was registered on 166 occasions in Dutch general and academic hospitals. Clinical details of 120 of those patients revealed that in 107 anaphylaxis was either probable (n=90) or possible (n=17), whereas in 13 cases some other reaction than anaphylaxis had occurred. The series of confirmed cases contained 46 men and 61 women, with mean ages of 47 y and 48 y, respectively.There was a complete recovery in 102 patients and two patients died. Hypotension was present in 79 cases (74%), dyspnoea in 34 cases (32%) and a skin reaction, mainly urticaria, erythema or angioedema, was mentioned in 62 cases (58%). Most cases of anaphylaxis were drug-induced (76%), the main causes being the analgesic glafenine and contrast media. Glafenine was mentioned as the cause in 36% of all admissions for drug-induced anaphylaxis. Only 3.7% of cases had been reported to the voluntary reporting scheme of the Netherlands Centre for Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to Drugs.On the basis of reimbursement data, the risk of developing severe anaphylaxis to glafenine was estimated at 11.7–19.3-fold relative to indomethacin, and 13.4–20.2-fold relative to oral penicillins.     

Fluoroquinolone‐Associated Tendinopathy: Does Levofloxacin Pose the Greatest Risk?

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics recently have gained increased national attention due to safety concerns. A well‐described and serious adverse event associated with receipt of fluoroquinolones is tendinitis and tendon rupture. These tendon injuries can result in long‐term sequelae, including chronic pain and mobility restrictions, and may warrant surgery. Due to the severity of these adverse events, a black box warning is included in the product labeling of all fluoroquinolones. In light of the mounting concerns surrounding fluoroquinolone‐associated toxicities, the purpose of this clinical review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the risk of tendinopathy associated with levofloxacin, one of the most widely prescribed antibiotics in the United States, across in vitro, animal, and clinical studies, relative to other antibiotics. As part of this review, clinical presentation and onset, proposed mechanisms, patient‐specific risk factors, and management of fluoroquinolone‐induced tendon injury are summarized. Data were obtained from a comprehensive PubMed literature search and a review of U.S. Food and Drug Administration documents. Although tendinopathy is considered a fluoroquinolone class–wide toxicity, data from in vitro studies, animal studies, patient‐level analyses, and large national and international surveillance reports suggest that levofloxacin, as well as its parent compound ofloxacin, possess higher propensities to cause tendon damage relative to other fluoroquinolones. Risk with ofloxacin and levofloxacin appears to be exposure dependent, with higher doses and longer durations being most commonly associated with tendinopathy. Other well‐described patient risk factors for fluoroquinolone‐associated tendinopathy include older age (older than 60 yrs), receipt of concomitant corticosteroid therapy, presence of renal dysfunction, and history of solid organ transplantation. Given widespread use of levofloxacin across patient care settings, knowledge of both patient‐ and drug‐specific characteristics associated with increased risk of tendinitis and tendon rupture can promote safe use of levofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones.     

Suxamethonium-induced histamine release from the heart of na?ve and suxamethonium-sensitized guinea-pigs: evidence suggesting spontaneous sensitization in na?ve animals, and relevance to anaphylactoid reactions in man

A guinea-pig model for anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions to suxamethonium was evaluated. 'Sensitization' to that drug was demonstrated both by cardiac anaphylaxis in the Langendorff preparation, and by serum antibody studies. Spontaneous sensitization to cross-reacting chemicals in a proportion of control animals is strongly suggested, somewhat akin to spontaneous sensitization in patients with anaphylactoid reactions to neuromuscular blockers on first exposure, and in whom IgE antibodies are detected.     

Moxifloxacin: new preparation. A me-too with more cardiac risks

(1) Moxifloxacin is the fourth fluoroquinolone to be licensed in France with indications covering ENT and respiratory tract infections. (2) In community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial sinusitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, moxifloxacin seems no more effective than other fluoroquinolones available in France (with which it has not been compared) or the other antibiotics with which it has been compared. (3) Moxifloxacin has the usual adverse effects of fluoroquinolones, but carries a greater risk of QT prolongation than ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and ofloxacin.     

Levofloxacin,a Second-Generation Fluoroquinolone

Levofloxacin, levo-isomer of the D,L-racemate ofloxacin, is a new fluoroquinolone antibiotic approved for use in the United States in December 1996. It has an extended spectrum of activity compared with older-generation fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin), with improved activity against gram-positive bacteria and excellent activity against gram-negative bacteria and atypical organisms. Although its activity against anaerobic organisms is improved over that of earlier fluoroquinolones, levofloxacin should not be considered a first-line anaerobic agent. It is available in an injectable form, as well as an oral formulation with virtually 100% oral bioavailability. The plasma elimination half-life ranges from 6–8 hours in individuals with normal renal function. Approximately 80% of drug is eliminated unchanged in urine through glomerular filtration and tubular secretion. The pharmacokinetics are not appreciably affected by age, gender, or race when differences in renal function and body mass and composition are taken into account. Levofloxacin had impressive efficacy in clinical studies of community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, acute sinusitis, skin and skin structure infections, and complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis. It is well tolerated; its adverse event profile is similar to that of other fluoroquinolones, with gastrointestinal and central nervous system effects reported most commonly. Drug interactions are uncommon with levofloxacin; however, coadministration with antacids or with other agents containing divalent or trivalent cations reduces levofloxacin absorption. The agent should prove to be more effective than older fluoroquinolones, especially for infections caused by pneumococci highly resistant to penicillin.     

New fluoroquinolone antibiotics

In 1993, we reviewed three fluoroquinolone antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and ofloxacin). Since then, four more fluoroquinolones have been awarded marketing authorisations. Here we review the clinical evidence and discuss the place of two of these drugs, grepafloxacin (Raxar-GlaxoWellcome) and levofloxacin (Tavanic-Hoechst Marion Roussel). Sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin are not considered, as they are not yet commercially available.     

氟喹诺酮类药对人肝药酶活性的影响

目的 :观察氟喹诺酮类 (FQs)药物对人肝微粒体药物代谢酶 (细胞色素P 4 5 0 )活性影响的差异。方法 :反应体系中微粒体蛋白终浓度为 0 .33～2 .0 g·L- 1,药物终浓度为 4 0 0mg·L- 1,测定药物代谢酶的活性。对照不加药。并测定不同底物浓度和不同环丙沙星浓度时乙基吗啡N 脱甲基酶的Vm和Km 值 ,求抑制常数Ki。结果 :FQs对酶活性的抑制强度为 :培氟沙星 (PFLX) >环丙沙星 (CPLX)>氧氟沙星 (OFLX) >左氧氟沙星 (LVLX)。FQs对戊巴比妥侧链羟化酶 (PSCH )、苯并芘羟化酶(BPH)、氨基比林N 脱甲基酶 (ADM )、乙基吗啡N 脱甲基酶 (EDM )和NADPH 细胞色素C还原酶的平均被抑制率分别为 :2 9% ,2 6 % ,19% ,17%和2 .3%。CPLX对EDM的抑制为竞争性抑制为主的混合性抑制 ,抑制常数Ki=2 5 0mg·L- 1。结论 :4种FQs对多种肝药酶活性均有不同程度的抑制 ,LVLX的抑制作用相对较弱。 5种肝药酶对药物的敏感性也各不相同。CPLX对EDM的抑制是竞争性抑制为主的混合性抑制。     

氟喹诺酮类抗菌药物致药物不良反应205例调查分析

目的分析氟喹诺酮类抗菌药物(FQNS)药物不良反应(ADR)的特点,为临床合理用药提供依据。方法对2001-2010年某院门、急诊及住院部应用FQNS致ADR患者205例进行回顾性统计、分析。结果男性ADR发生率高于女性,31～40岁年龄段ADR发生率最高(31.2%);引起ADR的主要给药途径为静脉注射,共105例(51.2%);共涉及10种FQNS,不良反应主要表现在神经、循环、皮肤、泌尿、消化、呼吸、血液等系统,其中以神经系统、皮肤及消化系统症状较突出。结论 FQNS致ADR因素较多,临床使用时应注意ADR的监测,合理用药,以提高用药的安全性,减少ADR的发生。     

围手术期地塞米松过敏的研究进展

围手术期地塞米松常应用于抗过敏治疗,近年来关于地塞米松引起的过敏反应的报道也越来越多。这些反应主要包括IgE介导的过敏反应和药物直接刺激释放组胺引起的类过敏反应。地塞米松引起的过敏反应是一种全身性或系统性反应,症状可从局部至全身。围手术期过敏原检测起着重要的作用,这些检测方法包括皮肤过敏试验,血清中组胺、类胰蛋白酶和IgE抗体浓度检测等。另外过敏反应发生后及时供氧、扩容和肾上腺素的应用是抢救患者的关键。     

Interactions of a series of fluoroquinolone antibacterial drugs with the human cardiac K+ channel HERG

Administration of certain fluoroquinolone antibacterials has been associated with prolongation of the QT interval on the electrocardiogram and, on rare occasions, ventricular arrhythmia. Blockade of the human cardiac K+ channel HERG often underlies such clinical findings. Therefore, we examined a series of seven fluoroquinolones for their ability to interact with this channel. Using patch-clamp electrophysiology, we found that all of the drugs tested inhibited HERG channel currents, but with widely differing potencies. Sparfloxacin was the most potent compound, displaying an IC50 value of 18 microM, whereas ofloxacin was the least potent compound, with an IC50 value of 1420 microM. Other IC50 values were as follows: grepafloxacin, 50 microM; moxifloxacin, 129 microM; gatifloxacin, 130 microM; levofloxacin, 915 microM; and ciprofloxacin, 966 microM. Block of HERG by sparfloxacin displayed a positive voltage dependence. In contrast to HERG, the KvLQT1/minK K+ channel was not a target for block by the fluoroquinolones. These results provide a mechanism for the QT prolongation observed clinically with administration of sparfloxacin and certain other fluoroquinolones because free plasma levels of these drugs after therapeutic doses approximate those concentrations that inhibit HERG channel current. In the cases of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin, inhibition of HERG occurs at concentrations much greater than those observed clinically. The data indicate that clinically relevant HERG channel inhibition is not a class effect of the fluoroquinolone antibacterials but is highly dependent upon specific substitutions within this series of compounds. HERG channel affinity should be an important criterion for the development of newer fluoroquinolones.     

Permeability classification of representative fluoroquinolones by a cell culture method

This study was undertaken to categorize representative fluoroquinolone drug substance permeability based on the methods outlined in the Food and Drug Administration's biopharmaceutic classification system (BCS) Guidance for Industry. The permeability of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, lomefloxacin, and ofloxacin was measured in an in vitro Caco-2 assay with previously demonstrated method suitability. The permeability class and efflux potential were ascertained by comparing test drug results with standard compounds (metoprolol, atenolol, labetalol, and rhodamine-123). All 4 quinolones drugs demonstrated concentration-dependent permeability, indicating active drug transport. In comparing absorptive versus secretive in vitro transport, the tested fluoroquinolones were found to be subject to efflux in varying degrees (ciprofloxacin > lomefloxacin > rhodamine 123 > levofloxacin > ofloxacin). Based on comparison to labetalol, the high permeability internal standard, ciprofloxacin was classified as a low permeability drug, whereas lomefloxacin, levofloxacin, and ofloxacin were classified as high permeability drugs. The in vitro permeability results matched human in vivo data based on absolute bioavailabilities. This laboratory exercise demonstrated the applicability of an in vitro permeability method for classifying drugs as outlined in the BCS Guidance.