Sentinel Lymph Node beim Mammakarzinom

Surgical treatment of breast cancer has changed dramatically during the last few decades with the aim of reducing surgical radicality in the breast and also in the axilla. In this context sentinel node biopsy is a reliable technique to determine axillary node status of breast cancer patients and reduce morbidity associated with standard axillary lymph node dissection. Although SNB is performed with increasing frequency, an incorrect indication and lack of experience with the surgical procedure can minimize the sensitivity and specificity of this method. In consequence, this could lead to wrong tumor staging and inappropriate adjuvant therapy. Therefore, we describe the basic requirements, indications, and pitfalls of this technique. Since many issues are controversial such as the prognostic value of micrometastases and extramammary nodes as well as the use of SNB after primary chemotherapy and in ductal carcinoma in situ, further clinical studies are necessary.     

Sentinel node biopsy in larger or multifocal breast cancers: to do or not to do

Background: The use of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer patients with large and/or multifocal tumours is controversial. Methods: A review of clinical records was undertaken for 213 consecutive patients undergoing SNB for invasive breast cancer from September 2000 to February 2006. The results of SNB and axillary dissection were compared for patients with unifocal or multifocal tumours less than 3 cm and 3 cm or larger. Patient outcomes were also assessed. Results: The mean number of sentinel nodes removed per patient increased from 2.33 in 2000 to 4.17 in 2006. For patients with unifocal tumours less than 3 cm, 47 of 147 (32.0%) were sentinel node positive compared with 15 of 30 (50%) for multifocal tumours less than 3 cm (P = 0.04), 19 of 28 (67.9%) for unifocal tumours 3 cm or larger (P < 0.001) and 7 of 8 (87.5%) for multifocal tumours 3 cm or larger (P = 0.003). Following axillary dissection, 20 of 48 (41.7%) patients with sentinel node macrometastases were found to have positive non‐sentinel nodes, compared with 4 of 20 (20.0%) and 1 of 8 (12.5%) for patients with sentinel node micrometastases and isolated tumour cells. The mean total number of positive nodes was 1.74 compared with 4.21 for unifocal tumours less than or greater than 3 cm, respectively (P = 0.004). No axillary recurrences were detected during the follow‐up period. Conclusion: Although patients with large and/or multifocal tumours were more likely to have a positive sentinel node, the findings provide some indication that SNB may be reliable for staging the axilla in these patients.     

Klinische Wertigkeit und zukünftige Aspekte der "Sentinel Node Biopsy" beim Mammakarzinom

INTRODUCTION: In view of its predictive potential, axillary nodal status plays a particularly important role in breast cancer. The concept of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) revealed an accurate method with low postoperative morbidity for staging the axilla in patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer. The aim of this study was to show that SNB alone must have a place in routine clinical work and is reliable after preoperative chemotherapy (PC) and also in patients with multicentric tumors (MC). PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between April 1997 and March 2002, a total of 300 SNBs were performed in patients with uni- or bilateral breast cancer. Of them, 45 who had completed PC and 13 with multicentric lesions underwent SNB followed by axillary dissection. The sentinel nodes (SN) were labelled with a blue dye and radioactive colloids. Median follow-up was 33.6 months (range 8.2-67.0) (StAw 1.4). RESULTS: The detection rate in the learning phase was 81.8% and later 93.5%, independently of the size of the primary tumor. Overall accuracy and negative predictive value of the first 55 patients, after PC and in those with MC came to 97.8% and 96.7%, 97.6%, 95.8% and 100%, respectively. Through focused pathologic examination, staging was improved in 11.3% of patients. A year after the procedure, one patient developed recurrence. Morbidity after SNB alone was significantly lower than after axillary dissection. CONCLUSION: Our experience shows SNB to be reliable and accurate for axillary staging in breast cancer patients. Morbidity after SNB alone was low. Conclusive data on the local recurrence rate are not yet available. Under certain conditions, SNB appears to have future clinical potential, even in patients with PC and MC, which must be confirmed in further multicentric studies.In the meantime, this method has attained definite value in the surgical therapy of breast cancer patients.     

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy more accurate than axillary dissection for staging nodal involvement in breast cancer patients?

Today evaluation of axillary involvement can be routinely performed with the technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). One of the greatest advantages of SLNB is the nearly total absence of local postoperative complications. It is important to understand whether SLNB is better than axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) for staging axillary nodal involvement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the axillary staging accuracy comparing three different methods: axillary dissection, sentinel node biopsy with the traditional 4-6 sections and sentinel node biopsy with complete analysis of the lymph node. 527 consecutive patients (525 females and 2 males) with invasive breast cancer < or = 3 cm and clinically negative axillary nodes were divided into 3 different groups: group A treated with axillary dissection, group B treated with sentinel nodal biopsy analysed with 4-6 sections, and group C treated with sentinel node biopsy with analysis of the entire node. All patients underwent a quadrantectomy to treat the tumor. Group differences and statistical significance were assessed by ANOVA. The percentages of N+ in group A and group B were 25.80% and 28% respectively, while in the third group it rose to 45%, or almost half the patients. The differences among the three groups were statistically significant (p = 0.02). From our analysis of the data it emerges that axillary dissection and sentinel node biopsy with analysis of 4-6 sections have the same accuracy in staging the nodal status of the axilla; analysis of the entire sentinel lymph node revealed an increased number of patients with axillary nodal involvement, proving more powerful in predicting nodal stage. SLNB with complete examination of the SLN removed can be considered the best method for axillary staging in breast cancer patients with clinical negative nodes. In our study, the percentage of metastases encountered after complete examination of SLN was 45% compared to the accuracy of axillary dissection that was only 25.8%. Moreover, this approach avoids the useless axillary cleaning in about 55-60% of cases, decreasing postoperative morbidity and mortality.     

Management of the axilla in early breast cancer: is it time to change tack?

The standard surgical treatment of the axilla in patients with early breast cancer is about to undergo a radical change. Although axillary dissection is an excellent procedure for both staging and local control, particularly in the clinically positive axilla, it has considerable morbidity and may understage a significant proportion of patients, because it will usually miss micrometastases that can occur in approximately 10% of ‘node negative’ patients. An increasing number of patients whose tumours are either non‐invasive (ductal carcinoma in situ; DCIS), micro‐invasive, tubular cancers or low‐grade T_1a tumours without lymphovascular invasion may be spared axillary surgery because the risk of axillary disease is 0–3%. Many studies, both prospective trials and large retrospective series, show that axillary radiotherapy alone provides similar local control rates to axillary dissection in patients with clinically negative axillas. Primary treatment of the axilla with radiotherapy alone, however, does not allow appropriate staging. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is being increasingly used in patients with breast cancer to provide this information. When a sentinel node is identified it is equal to or better than axillary dissection for staging the axilla and, if the node is positive, it will help select patients who should then proceed to further axillary surgery or axillary radiotherapy. Although sentinel lymph node biopsy is being rapidly adopted in many centres worldwide, the results of randomized controlled trials are needed before it can be recommended as the standard of care.     

Cost/Accuracy Ratio Analysis in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology,Sentinel Node Biopsy,and Frozen Section of Node

We evaluated the effectiveness and the cost of axillary staging in breast cancer patients by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC), sentinel node biopsy (SNB), and frozen sections of the sentinel node to achieve the target of the highest number of immediate axillary dissections. From January 2003 through October 2005, a total of 404 consecutive eligible breast cancer patients underwent US-FNAC of suspicious axillary lymph nodes. If tumor cells were found, immediate axillary dissection was proposed (33% of node-positive cases). If US or cytology was negative, SNB was performed. Frozen sections of the sentinel node allowed immediate axillary dissection in 31% of node-positive cases. The remaining 36% underwent delayed axillary dissection. We compared our policy with clinical evaluation of the axilla, showing better specificity of US-FNAC, the cost balanced by a 12% reduction of SNBs, and a marked reduction of unnecessary axillary dissections resulting from false-positive clinical staging. Moreover, the comparison between our policy and permanent histology of the sentinel node showed an 8% cost saving, mainly associated with the immediate axillary dissections. US-FNAC of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients reliably predicts the presence of metastases and therefore refers a significant number of patients to the appropriate surgical treatment, avoiding an SNB. As cost saving to the health care system in our study is mainly related to one-step axillary surgery, US-FNAC of axillary lymph nodes and frozen section of the sentinel node generate significant cost saving for patients who have metastatic nodes.     

Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: validation study and comparison of blue dye alone with triple modality localization

Background: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for breast cancer patients is a new technique with the potential to provide an accurate staging of the axillary nodal status while avoiding the morbidity of an axillary dissection. The objective of the present study is to validate the use of sentinel node biopsy in a New Zealand hospital and to compare the ability of patent blue dye (PB) alone with triple modality (TM) (preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative gamma probe and intraoperative blue dye) to identify the sentinel node. Methods: A total of 104 patients who had a palpable breast lump that was confirmed to be malignant by radiology and cytology and a clinical diagnosis of stage I or stage II breast cancer, were enrolled for SNB and randomly assigned to triple modality or blue dye alone for the localization of the sentinel node. Axillary dissection was performed after the sentinel node(s) had been removed. Results: There were 63 patients in the PB group and 41 patients in the TM group. Both groups are comparable, with a similar mean age and primary tumour size. A sentinel node was identified in 57 (90%) of the PB group patients and 40 (98%) of the TM group patients. Of these 23 (37%) of the PB group and 23 (56%) in the TM group had axillary nodes positive for malignancy. There was one false negative SNB in the PB group and two false negative results in the TM group. Therefore, the PB group had an accuracy of 98% and a sensitivity of 96% compared to an accuracy of 95% and a sensitivity of 91% for the TM group. Conclusion: The results of the present study validate the use of SNB in suitable breast cancer patients. Identification and the accuracy of the sentinel node localization were similar between the two groups. Therefore, in hospital centres without adequate access to a nuclear medical facility, it would be feasible to conduct SNB using blue dye alone.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer patients: improved survival through better staging?

Purpose

The objective of this review is to summarize the evidence demonstrating that the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure is not only associated with significantly less morbidity compared to the axillary dissection, but may also result in better staging and improved patient outcomes.

Methods

A search of MedLine and PubMed articles using the terms “sentinel lymph node biopsy”, “breast cancer”, “staging”, “morbidity”, “survival”, and “outcomes” was conducted.

Results

Breast cancer staging includes axillary evaluation as an integral component. Over the past two decades, sentinel lymph node biopsy has evolved as a technique that has an improved morbidity over traditional axillary dissection. The sentinel node(s) undergo a more intensive pathologic examination than traditional axillary contents. In the node-negative group of patients, this may have led to stage migration and potentially improved disease-free and overall survival.

Conclusion

The SLN procedure is not only associated with significantly less morbidity compared to the axillary lymph node dissection, it may also result in more accurate staging, better axillary tumor control and improved survival.     

Removal of two sentinel nodes accurately stages the axilla in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Assessment of lymph node status in breast cancer is still necessary for staging. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) may provide accurate staging with less morbidity than axillary clearance. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the number of sentinel nodes removed on the false-negative rate. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from 395 women undergoing SNB for breast cancer, between June 1995 and December 2001. All nodes that were hot and/or blue were removed and analysed. RESULTS: During this interval 136 patients who had SNB were lymph node positive. The median number of sentinel nodes removed was two (range one to five). The overall false-negative rate of SNB in these women was 7.1 per cent. If only one sentinel node had been removed, the false-negative rate would have been 16.5 per cent. The removal of more than two nodes had no effect on axillary staging in all but two women. CONCLUSION: In early breast cancer, when there were multiple sentinel nodes, removal of two sentinel nodes significantly reduced the false-negative rate compared with removal of one node. Removing more than two sentinel nodes did not significantly reduce the false-negative rate further.     

Axillary Recurrence After Sentinel Node Biopsy

Background Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has evolved as the standard of care in the surgical staging of breast cancer. This technique is accurate for surgical staging of axillary nodal disease. We hypothesized that axillary recurrence after SNB is rare and that SNB may provide regional control in patients with microscopic nodal involvement.Methods With institutional review board approval, SNB was performed with peritumoral injection of ^99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid. From 1996 to 2003, 1167 patients were entered into a prospective cancer database after surgical therapy; 916 patients consented to long-term follow-up. Fifty-two patients (5.7%) did not map successfully and were excluded, leading to a study population of 864 patients. The median follow-up was 27.4 months (range, 1–98 months).Results The median number of sentinel nodes harvested was 2, and 633 (73%) patients had negative sentinel nodes. Thirty (4.7%) of those sentinel node–negative patients underwent completion axillary dissection, whereas 592 (94%) patients were followed up with observation. A total of 231 (27%) had positive sentinel nodes: 158 (68%) of these patients underwent completion axillary dissection, and 73 (32%) were managed with observation alone. Two (.32%) patients who were sentinel node negative had an axillary recurrence; one of these patients had undergone completion axillary dissection. No patient in the observed sentinel node–positive group had an axillary recurrence (odds ratio, .37; P = .725).Conclusions On the basis of a median follow-up of 27.4 months, axillary recurrence after SNB is extraordinarily rare regardless of nodal involvement, thus indicating that this technique provides an accurate measure of axillary disease and may impart regional control for patients with node-positive disease.     

Role of axillary surgery in early breast cancer: review of the current evidence

BACKGROUND: Controversy continues to surround the best practice for management of the axilla in patients with early breast cancer (EBC), particularly the clinically negative axilla. The balance between therapeutic and staging roles of axillary surgery (with the consequent morbidity of the procedures utilized) has altered. This is due to the increasing frequency of women presenting with early stage disease, the more widespread utilization of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy and, more recently, the advent of alternative staging procedures, principally sentinel node biopsy (SNB). The aim of the present review is to critically analyse the current literature concerning the preferred management of the axilla in early breast cancer and make evidence-based recommendations on current management. METHODS: A review was undertaken of the English language medical literature, using MEDLINE database software and cross-referencing major articles on the subject, focusing on the last 10 years. The following combinations of key words have been searched: breast neoplasms, axilla, axillary dissection, survival, prognosis, and sentinel node biopsy. RESULTS: Despite the trend to more frequent earlier stage diagnosis, levels I and II axillary dissection remain the treatment of choice in the majority of women with EBC and a clinically negative axilla. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node biopsy has no proven superiority over axillary dissection because no randomized controlled trials have been completed to date. Despite this, SNB will become increasingly utilized due to encouraging results from major centres responsible for its development, and patient demand. Therefore if patients are not being enrolled in clinical trials strict quality controls need to be established at a local level before SNB is allowed to replace standard treatment of the axilla. Unless this is strictly adhered to there is a significant risk of an increase in the frequency of axillary relapse and possible increased understaging and resultant inadequate treatment of patients.     

Experience of sentinel node biopsy alone in early breast cancer without further axillary dissection in patients with negative sentinel node

AIMS: The aims of surgical therapy of breast cancer are loco-regional tumour control and staging. Axillary staging is still considered the single most important prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Surgical removal of axillary nodes remains the standard way to assess their involvement in most centres. The morbidity associated with axillary dissection (AD) is well recognized. In recent years sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has evolved. Multiple studies suggest it has the same accuracy as AD in axillary staging and less morbidity in early breast cancer (EBC). SNB has become the standard of practice in EBC in many parts of the world. In Australia, the preference has been to wait for the results of the Sentinel Node versus Axillary Clearance (SNAC) trial as well as other international trials before accepting SNB as a standard of care. The experience of a single surgeon with SNB alone in EBC without further completion axillary dissection (CAD) in negative sentinel node (SLN) is described in the present paper. METHODS: An audit was done of the senior author's prospective data from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons database. Other information was added retrospectively from case notes. RESULTS: Between December 2000 and December 2003, 154 EBC cases (153 patients) underwent SNB alone. An average of four SLN was removed. Of these cases, 31.8% had positive SLNs (excluding 2.6% cases that had isolated tumour cells), of these, 93.9% had metastases (39.1% micro- and 60.9% macro-metastases) in axillary-SLN (ASLN) and almost all of these had CAD. ASLNs were the only positive nodes in 73.9%. Extra-ASLN retrieved in 68.8% of 34% demonstrated on lymphoscintigraphy. Of these, 12.1% were positive (6.1% micro- and macro-metastases each), all internal mammary. Mean follow up was 22.1 months. There was one local-regional-systemic and one systemic recurrence over this time. CONCLUSION: SNB has a valid role in staging of the axilla particularly in low-risk patients. After adequate self audit, SNB offers a minimal morbidity and reliable method of axillary staging. Patients choosing SNB alone must understand that the long-term results of the randomized controlled trial are still pending for level I evidence of long-term efficacy.     

The learning curve for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: practical considerations.

HYPOTHESIS: Performance of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) instead of full axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) by inexperienced surgeons will lead to understaging of some women with breast cancer and increased costs. DESIGN: A decision analysis model was used to investigate the implications of SNB vs. full ALND during the learning phase (60-80 procedures). This model simulates a randomized trial of 10000 women in each arm. Data regarding the learning curve were obtained from published series. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of women with inaccurate staging of their breast cancer, overall survival, quality-adjusted survival, and potential costs of SNB vs ALND. RESULTS: Performance of SNB instead of ALND results in inability to locate a sentinel node in 38% of attempts during the learning phase (compared with 10% in later cases) and understaging in 12% of patients during the learning phase (compared with 0% in later cases). This understaging is associated with a small decrement in survival (1%-2%) and an increased risk of axillary recurrence. Sentinel node biopsy is cost-effective only when the ability to detect sentinel nodes exceeds 80%; and the cost of SNB is less than 50% of the cost of ALND. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure accurate staging of patients with breast cancer, all surgeons should perform full ALND while learning SNB techniques. Only after documentation of accuracy of SNB (sensitivity >90%) should full ALND be omitted for women with negative sentinel nodes.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy or detection of micrometastasis in bone marrow: which might be an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients?

Axillary lymph node status has limited prognostic significance in breast cancer patients and much improvement can be made. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is emerging as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection for staging, but its prognostic relevance is still uncertain. Detection of micrometastases in sentinel nodes and bone marrow may provide more information, but the clinical significance still needs to be confirmed by ongoing large trials. In this review, we focus on the possibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy or detection of bone marrow micrometastasis replacing traditional axillary lymph node dissection.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of breast cancer. Experience in 527 cases

AIM: Knowledge of axillary lymph node status is a key aid to staging and prognosis and it represents a guideline for adjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Despite the morbidity it causes, complete axillary dissection was long the mainstay of treatment. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has proved so reliable in the evaluation of node involvement that axillary node dissection is now generally performed when sentinel node biopsy tests negative. METHODS: In this 3-phase study, 50 patients were enrolled to evaluate the learning curve of sentinel node biopsy (phase 1, September 1997-January 1998); 256 patients (age range 27-81 years) with infiltrative breast cancer (T <3 cm, clinical N0) underwent level 1 lymph node dissection when the sentinel node tested negative at histopathology (phase 2, February 1998-March 2001); 221 patients with T <3 cm underwent dissection of the sentinel node when it tested negative for metastasis (phase 3, April 2001-March 2005). RESULTS: The sentinel node was preoperatively detected in 98.6% of cases after peritumoral and intradermic injection of the radionuclide tracer and intraoperatively in 99% (90% with radio-guided surgery, 10% with vital staining). The sentinel node was positive in 15% of patients with T1 and metastatic in 65%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are in line with the published data; therefore, the study will go forward to examine the role of the micrometastasis in the sentinel node and of in-transit tumoral cells.     

Can radiotherapy replace axillary dissection for patients with positive sentinel nodes?

The substitution of sentinel node biopsy for axillary dissection for patients with early-stage breast cancer has reduced the morbidity of pathologic axillary nodal staging substantially. However, this has resulted in substantial controversy about how to manage patients with positive sentinel nodes. Radiation therapy has been used for many years instead of or in addition to axillary sampling or axillary dissection. This article will examine parts of this experience relevant to the treatment of patients with positive sentinel node biopsy, the limited data on outcome of patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy who do not undergo completion dissection, and the toxicities of axillary irradiation. Finally, I suggest an overall approach to the management of patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy.     

Sentinel Node Biopsy: Standard of Care

Abstract: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a less invasive alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for staging breast cancer. In appropriate women, this procedure can stage the axilla with less extensive surgery and fewer complications. Sentinel node status is accurate in predicting axillary status based on single institutional experiences and confirmed by large multi‐center trials. Non‐sentinel nodes are involved very rarely if the sentinel node is tumor‐free. SLNB enables intense examination of a single lymph node. However, the use of special stains to detect micrometastases is of uncertain clinical significance and is the subject of large trials. Early follow‐up from the John Wayne Cancer Institute experience demonstrates excellent outcome for patients with either micrometastases or tumor‐free nodes. Results from techniques with either blue dye or radioisotope colloid tracer and injection locations at peri‐areolar, peritumoral, or subcutaneous sites are similar. These findings support the biological concept of a single (or very few) sentinel nodes for the entire breast. The sentinel node is more predictive of axillary status than any other tumor prognostic factor. Axillary lymph node dissection is unlikely to reveal nodal metastases when the sentinel node is tumor‐free, and in such cases there is no reason to perform a completion axillary node dissection. Sentinel node biopsy alone without axillary lymph node dissection should now be the standard of care for most clinically node‐negative women with breast cancer.     

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy has become an important tool for axillary lymph node staging in women with early-stage breast cancer. This review examines data regarding the staging accuracy, indications and technical aspects of the procedure, and clinical trials investigating the technique. Multiple studies now confirm that sentinel lymphadenectomy accurately stages the axilla and is associated with less morbidity than axillary dissection. Blue dye, radiocolloid, or both can be used to identify the sentinel node, and several injection techniques may be used successfully. Many patient factors previously thought to affect accuracy of the procedure have now been shown to be of limited significance. The indications for the procedure are expanding, and the histopathologic evaluation of the sentinel node and the role of lymphoscintigraphy have been clarified. Clinical trials are now underway that will determine the prognostic significance of micrometastases and the therapeutic benefit of axillary dissection in women with and without sentinel node metastases. Incorporation of sentinel lymphadenectomy into routine clinical practice will maintain accurate axillary staging with lower morbidity and improved quality of life for women with early-stage breast cancer.     

Axillary dissection

Axillary dissection remains an important aspect of breast cancer treatment. No other factor has been demonstrated to be of more prognostic significance in breast cancer than the presence or absence of axillary metastases.^12–14 An axillary sampling that excises fewer than 6 nodes is inadequate for staging and should not be substituted for a complete axillary dissection. Note that directed sentinel node biopsy is different than random axillary lymph node sampling, and these 2 procedures should not be confused. Generally, the pathologist will identify and examine some 15 to 25 nodes in an axillary dissection specimen. The absolute number of axillary nodes varies from individual to individual and with the diligence of pathological examination. Recently, it has been our practice to process the axillary nodes for permanent sections, allowing multiple levels of each node to be studied. Cytokeratin staining is also used selectively.As axillary dissection enters its third century, it must continue to provide complete staging information, combined with preservation of function and cosmetic acceptance. The impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy on axillary dissection is currently being defined.¹⁵ However, it is clear that precise, reliable axillary staging information will remain an indispensable part of surgery for primary breast cancer.^16,17     

Management of the axilla in early breast cancer: is it time to change tack?

The standard surgical treatment of the axilla in patients with early breast cancer is about to undergo a radical change. Although axillary dissection is an excellent procedure for both staging and local control, particularly in the clinically positive axilla, it has considerable morbidity and may understage a significant proportion of patients, because it will usually miss micrometastases that can occur in approximately 10% of 'node negative' patients. An increasing number of patients whose tumours are either non-invasive (ductal carcinoma in situ; DCIS), micro-invasive, tubular cancers or low-grade T1a tumours without lymphovascular invasion may be spared axillary surgery because the risk of axillary disease is 0-3%. Many studies, both prospective trials and large retrospective series, show that axillary radiotherapy alone provides similar local control rates to axillary dissection in patients with clinically negative axillas. Primary treatment of the axilla with radiotherapy alone, however, does not allow appropriate staging. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is being increasingly used in patients with breast cancer to provide this information. When a sentinel node is identified it is equal to or better than axillary dissection for staging the axilla and, if the node is positive, it will help select patients who should then proceed to further axillary surgery or axillary radiotherapy. Although sentinel lymph node biopsy is being rapidly adopted in many centres worldwide, the results of randomized controlled trials are needed before it can be recommended as the standard of care.