Clozapine augmented with risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of augmenting clozapine with risperidone in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. METHOD: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 12-week trial, 40 patients unresponsive or partially responsive to clozapine monotherapy received a steady dose of clozapine combined with either placebo (N=20) or up to 6 mg/day of risperidone (N=20). Patient psychopathology was assessed at 2-week intervals with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), among other measures. Movement disorders were assessed with the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale. RESULTS: From baseline to week 6 and week 12, mean BPRS total and positive symptom subscale scores were reduced significantly in both groups, but the reductions were significantly greater with clozapine/risperidone treatment. Reductions in SANS scores were also significantly greater with clozapine/risperidone treatment than with clozapine/placebo. The adverse event profile for clozapine/risperidone treatment was similar to that for clozapine/placebo. Simpson-Angus Rating Scale scores were lower with clozapine/risperidone treatment throughout the trial but increased to approach those of clozapine/placebo treatment at week 12. Clozapine/risperidone treatment did not induce additional weight gain, agranulocytosis, or seizures compared with clozapine/placebo treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a suboptimal response to clozapine, the addition of risperidone improved overall symptoms and positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The combination appears to be safe and well tolerated. Augmentation of clozapine with risperidone may provide additional clinical benefit for patients who are nonresponsive or only partially responsive to clozapine alone.     

Clozapine in adolescent inpatients with acute mania

Some bipolar patients with acute manic episodes can be refractory to conventional treatment with mood stabilizers. Clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic, has been reported to be effective in adults with treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. We describe the therapeutic effect of clozapine in 10 adolescent inpatients (12- to 17-year-olds) with severe acute manic or mixed episodes who did not improve after treatment with conventional drugs (mood stabilizers, antipsychotics). At hospital discharge, 15 to 28 days after clozapine treatment, all patients had responded positively according to the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale scores. The mean changes in Mania Rating Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Children's Global Assessment Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale were significant (p < 0.001). Clozapine dosage was 142.5 +/- 73.6 mg/day (range 75-300 mg/day). Side effects (increased appetite, sedation, enuresis, sialorrhea) were frequent but not severe enough to require reduction of dosage. Mean weight gain after 6 months was 6.96 +/- 3.08 kg (10.7%). Neither decrease of white cells nor epileptic seizures were reported during follow-up (12-24 months). These preliminary findings suggest that clozapine may improve the clinical picture in adolescents with treatment-refractory manic or mixed episodes. Controlled studies on larger samples are warranted.     

Chronic nicotine interactions with clozapine and risperidone and attentional function in rats

Although antipsychotic drugs are therapeutically effective in attenuating the hallmark symptoms of schizophrenia, these improvements do not return most patients to normative standards of cognitive function. Thus, complementary drug treatment may be needed to treat the attentional deficits of schizophrenia as well as to counteract the potential attentional impairments caused by some antipsychotic drugs. Nicotine, a drug commonly self-administered by a great majority of individuals with schizophrenia, has been shown to significantly improve cognitive function in some studies. The current study was conducted to determine the interactive effects of the atypical antipsychotic drugs clozapine and risperidone with chronic nicotine administration on attentional performance. Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats (N=35) were trained to perform an attentional task using an operant visual signal detection task. After training, rats were infused with a dose of 5 mg/kg/day (s.c.) nicotine base (n=18) or saline (n=17) for 28 consecutive days via osmotic pump. In Exp. 1, while being administered chronic nicotine or saline, rats were given acute doses of clozapine (0, 0.625, 1.25 and 2.5 mg/kg, s.c.) and were tested for attentional function. In Exp. 2, while on chronic nicotine or saline, other rats were challenged with acute doses of risperidone (0, 0.025, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg, s.c.) and were tested for attentional function. Results showed that acute administration of clozapine caused a significant dose-dependent impairment in choice accuracy (percent hit) in animals treated with chronic saline. Chronic nicotine treatment itself lowered accuracy, but attenuated further declines with acute clozapine treatment. Acute administration of risperidone at high dose significantly reduced performance (percent correct rejection) in chronically saline-treated rats, but in a similar fashion as in Exp. 1, chronic nicotine lowered accuracy but attenuated further impairment with acute risperidone. In summary, atypical antipsychotic drugs clozapine and risperidone significantly impaired choice accuracy in the visual signal detection task. Clozapine was more detrimental than risperidone but the adverse effects of both clozapine and risperidone on attentional performance were masked in rats chronically treated with nicotine.     

Risperidone augmentation for schizophrenia partially responsive to clozapine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

RATIONALE: Risperidone augmentation of clozapine in refractory schizophrenia has theoretical but only inconsistent support from clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To examine if adding risperidone to stable yet symptomatic schizophrenia outpatients on optimized clozapine monotherapy improves psychopathology. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group trial of a fixed dose of 4 mg/day risperidone added for 6 weeks in 24 outpatients with schizophrenia. RESULTS: Subjects who received risperidone showed a non-significant decrease in PANSS total score. The PANSS disorganized thought subscale improved significantly (beta=-3.3079, p=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Our trial does not support the routine addition of risperidone to clozapine in refractory schizophrenia patients. However, much larger trials are needed to conclusively settle the question of added efficacy from this combination.     

Differences in prolactin elevation and related symptoms of atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenic patients

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the degree and frequency of prolactin (PRL) elevation and related symptoms in patients treated with 3 different atypical antipsychotics: clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone. METHOD: Twenty-eight patients receiving clozapine, 29 patients receiving olanzapine, and 18 patients receiving risperidone (all meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreni-form disorder, or schizoaffective disorder) were studied. The median daily dose was 400 mg of clozapine, 10 mg of olanzapine, and 3 mg of risperidone. Fasting morning blood samples were analyzed for PRL, and the occurrence of hyper-prolactinemic symptoms in the patients was evaluated. RESULTS: Elevated PRL levels were found in 16 (89%) of the patients receiving risperidone and in 7 (24%) of the patients receiving olanzapine, but in none of the patients receiving clozapine. In addition, there was a significant difference in median PRL level among the treatment groups (p < .0001), in that the PRL level was higher both in the patients treated with risperidone and in the patients treated with olanzapine, compared to those treated with clozapine. Moreover, hyperpro-lactinemic symptoms-menstrual disturbances, galactorrhea, impotence, oligospermia, and decreased libido-were reported in 8 (44%) of the risperidone-treated patients and in 1 (3%) of the olanzapine-treated patients, but in none of the clozapine-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment with risperidone was frequently associated with hyperprolactinemia and related symptoms, whereas the occurrence of PRL elevation and related symptoms was modest in patients receiving olanzapine and nonexistent in those receiving clozapine. Thus, atypical anti-psychotics in therapeutic doses differ with regard to effect on PRL secretion.     

Clozapine: its impact on aggressive behavior among children and adolescents with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of clozapine on aggressive behavior for treatment-refractory adolescents (age range 8.5-18) with schizophrenia (295.x) at Bronx Children's Psychiatric Center. METHOD: Clozapine treatment was administered in an open-label fashion using a flexible titration schedule. The frequency of administration of emergency oral and injectable medications and the frequency of seclusion events 3 months immediately before and from 12 to 24 weeks of clozapine treatment (when optimal clozapine levels were achieved) were compared. RESULTS: Twenty clozapine-treated children (mean +/- SD dose at week 24, 476 +/- 119 mg) were included. A statistically significant decrease in the frequency of the administration of emergency oral medications, the administration of emergency injectable medications, and seclusion events was found in adolescents during weeks 12 to 24 of clozapine treatment compared with their baseline condition before clozapine initiation. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data indicate the benefits of clozapine treatment in adolescents with treatment-refractory schizophrenia for aggressive behaviors. Although open data limit conclusions from this study, it is important that there was a clinically significant improvement in aggressive behaviors that enabled patients to be discharged to a less restrictive setting. Additional controlled clinical trials of clozapine are needed in treatment-refractory children and adolescents.     

利培酮和氯氮平治疗伴抑郁症状的难治性精神分裂症对照研究

目的：比较利培酮和氯氮平对伴抑郁症状的难治性精神分裂症疗效。方法：共70例难治性精神分裂症患者随机服用利培酮和氯氮平治疗。利培酮组34例,氯氮平组36例;伴有抑郁症状者39例,利培酮组17例,氯氮平组22例。治疗12周。分别于治疗前、治疗4、8、12周末采用阳性与阴性症状量表（PANSS）,汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）及功能大体评定量表（GAF）评定疗效。结果：两组PANSS、HAMD和GAF评分在治疗12周均有显著改善;两组间比较差异无显著性。有、无抑郁症状组在治疗4、8、12周末的HAMD总分与治疗前比较均显著减少。结论：抑郁症状不影响难治性精神分裂症的疗效;利培酮和氯氮平对伴抑郁症状的难治性精神分裂症均有效。     

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of risperidone for the treatment of aggression,agitation, and psychosis of dementia

BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial examined the efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of aggression, agitation, and psychosis in elderly nursing-home patients with dementia. METHOD: Elderly patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer's type, vascular dementia, or a combination of the 2 (i.e., mixed dementia) and significant aggressive behaviors were randomized to receive, for a period of 12 weeks, a flexible dose of either placebo or risperidone solution up to a maximum of 2 mg/day. Outcome measures were the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) rating scale, and the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and of Change (CGI-C) scales. RESULTS: A total of 345 patients were randomized to treatment with risperidone or placebo, and 337 patients received at least one dose of study drug. The trial was completed by 67% of patients in the placebo group and 73% of patients in the risperidone group. The mean +/- SE dose of risperidone was 0.95 +/- 0.03 mg/day. The primary endpoint of the study, the difference from baseline to endpoint in CMAI total aggression score, showed a significant reduction in aggressive behavior for risperidone versus placebo (p <.001). A similar improvement was also seen for the CMAI total non-aggression subscale (p <.002) and for the BEHAVE-AD total (p <.001) and psychotic symptoms subscale (p =.004). At endpoint, the CGI-S and the CGI-C scores indicated a significantly greater improvement with risperidone compared with placebo (p <.001). Overall, 94% and 92% of the risperidone and placebo groups, respectively, reported at least 1 adverse event. Somnolence and urinary tract infection were more common with risperidone treatment, whereas agitation was more common with placebo. There was no significant difference in the number of patients who reported extrapyramidal symptoms between the risperidone (23%) and placebo (16%) groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with low-dose (mean = 0.95 mg/day) risperidone resulted in significant improvement in aggression, agitation, and psychosis associated with dementia.     

Treatment Refractory Schizophrenia: How should We Proceed?

A substantial portion of schizophrenic patients demonstrate suboptimal response to conventional antipsychotics. These agents are primarily effective in the treatment of psychotic symptoms; their efficacy in other domains of psychopathology such as negative symptoms, chronic aggressive behavior, and cognitive deficits, is limited or non-existent. In this group of refractory patients, the novel atypical antipsychotic clozapine has demonstrated robust efficacy, with response rates approaching 60% after twelve weeks of treatment. Efficacy of clozapine extends to symptom domains other than psychosis, including negative symptoms, mood stabilization, aggressive behavior and compulsive water drinking. Several novel agents, each of which shares some, but not all, of the preclinical and clinical characteristics that make clozapine so unique, have been introduced in the last 4 years. These agents demonstrate a broader spectrum of efficacy and an improved side effect profile in non-refractory patients. Initial data on their efficacy in refractory patients suggests that olanzapine does not achieve overall superior efficacy in this patient population compared to conventional agents although there is some evidence of relatively greater efficacy in negative symptoms and aggressivity. Several studies suggest that the efficacy of risperidone is superior to that of conventional agents in refractory patients. Preliminary conclusions are not possible for quetiapine because of a paucity of data in the literature. The literature supports a risperidone trial prior to a clozapine trial in a treatment algorithm for refractory patients because of its more favorable risk/benefit profile.     

Efficacy of clozapine in the course of Huntington chorea: apropos of a clinical case]

Previous case reports suggest the potential benefits of use of clozapine on psychotic symptoms in Huntington's chorea. Clozapine was administered to a 70 years old female patient admitted in the inpatient unit of the Department of Psychiatry for parano?d delusions, hallucinations, comorbid with Huntington's chorea. Clozapine was administered with increasing regimen ranging from 25 to 200 mg/day after all other medications were discontinued. No other drugs were associated. Clinical evaluation was carried out at days 0, 28, 56, 112, 280 using the PANSS and Psychotic Depression Rating Scale. The clinical improvement was associated with plasma levels of clozapine which have been recognized as in therapeutic ranges by previous studies. Clozapine proved efficient on both positive and negative symptoms as assessed by a decrease of the PANSS ratings (-44%) between day 0 and day 56, (-61%) between day 0 and day 280, and by a decrease of Psychotic Depression ratings (-43%) between day 0 and day 56, (-60%) between day 0 and day 280. It was also effective on choreiform movements. The clinical improvement was associated with plasma levels of clozapine which have been recognized as in therapeutic ranges by previous studies. A lower daily dose than those classically used in schizophrenia was sufficient to obtain efficient treatment.     

Risperidone added to clozapine: impact on serum prolactin levels

BACKGROUND: Several years ago, we reported that the addition of risperidone to clozapine improved response in some patients with schizophrenia. Risperidone, in general, is well tolerated when administered as monotherapy, but has been linked to a persistent elevation of serum prolactin and associated symptoms. The goal of this study was to determine whether the addition of risperidone to clozapine results in an elevation of serum prolactin levels in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: Twenty patients on clozapine-risperidone combination therapy were matched for age and gender with 20 patients treated with clozapine monotherapy. Demographic information was gathered along with clozapine and risperidone dose and the length of time on risperidone. Serum prolactin levels were measured from a single blood sample. RESULTS: The 2 groups did not differ in age, race, gender, diagnosis, age at clozapine initiation, age at onset, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale scores, or clozapine dose. The mean +/- SD serum prolactin level was 8.42+/-4.17 ng/mL for clozapine monotherapy patients and 35.76+/-17.43 ng/mL for combination therapy patients. The 2 medication categories showed a significant difference in log prolactin values (t = -7.97, df = 38, p < or = .0001). Sixteen combination therapy patients (80%) exhibited elevated prolactin levels (range for entire group, 9.7-69.8 ng/mL) while only 2 clozapine monotherapy patients (10%) exhibited prolactin elevation levels (range for entire group, 2.4-20.2 ng/mL; df = 1, p < .0001). CONCLUSION: The combination of risperidone and clozapine appears to result in a moderate elevation of serum prolactin levels. Additionally, controlled prospective studies are needed to clarify the risks of long-term elevations of serum prolactin level.     

Comparison of risperidone and placebo for psychosis and behavioral disturbances associated with dementia: a randomized, double-blind trial. Risperidone Study Group

BACKGROUND: We report the findings from the first large, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of psychotic and behavioral symptoms in institutionalized elderly patients with dementia. METHOD: 625 patients (67.8% women; mean age = 82.7 years) with DSM-IV diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (73%), vascular dementia (15%), or mixed dementia (12%) and significant psychotic and behavioral symptoms were included. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive placebo or 0.5 mg/day, 1 mg/day, or 2 mg/day of risperidone for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease rating scale (BEHAVE-AD). RESULTS: The study was completed by 70% of the patients. Baseline Functional Assessment Staging scores were 6 or 7 in more than 95% of the patients, indicating severe dementia. At endpoint, significantly greater reductions in BEHAVE-AD total scores and psychosis and aggressiveness subscale scores were seen in patients receiving 1 and 2 mg/day of risperidone than in placebo patients (p = .005 and p < .001, respectively). At week 12, 0.5 mg/day of risperidone was superior to placebo in reducing BEHAVE-AD aggression scores (p = .02). More adverse events were reported by patients receiving 2 mg/day of risperidone than 1 mg/day. The most common dose-related adverse events were extrapyramidal symptoms, somnolence, and mild peripheral edema. The frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms in patients receiving 1 mg/day of risperidone was not significantly greater than in placebo patients. CONCLUSION: Risperidone significantly improved symptoms of psychosis and aggressive behavior in patients with severe dementia. Results show that 1 mg/day of risperidone is an appropriate dose for most elderly patients with dementia.     

D-Cycloserine added to risperidone in patients with primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia

BACKGROUND: D-Cycloserine, a partial agonist at the glycine recognition site of the NMDA receptor has previously been shown to improve negative symptoms when added to conventional antipsychotics and to worsen negative symptoms when added to clozapine. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of D-cycloserine when added to risperidone on negative symptoms of schizophrenia. METHOD: Ten patients with schizophrenia who were treated with risperidone completed consecutive two week trials of placebo and four doses of D-cycloserine. Clinical assessments were videotaped and were scored by a rater who was blind to temporal sequence. RESULTS: D-Cycloserine at a dose of 50mg/day was associated with significant reduction in negative symptoms (mean=10%). Ratings of depression, extrapyramidal side effects, and cognitive function were unchanged. Serum concentrations of glutamate and serine increased significantly on this dose of D-cycloserine. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that combination of D-cycloserine, 50mg/day, with risperidone may improve negative symptoms of schizophrenia over a narrow dose range. The degree of improvement appears to be intermediate between improvement of negative symptoms observed with combination of D-cycloserine with conventional antipsychotics and worsening of negative symptoms observed with combination of D-cycloserine with clozapine in previous trials of identical design.     

Equivalent occupancy of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors with clozapine: differentiation from other atypical antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE: Clozapine, the prototype of atypical antipsychotics, remains unique in its efficacy in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. Its affinity for dopamine D(4) receptors, serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism, effects on the noradrenergic system, and its relatively moderate occupancy of D(2) receptors are unlikely to be the critical mechanism underlying its efficacy. In an attempt to elucidate the molecular/synaptic mechanism underlying clozapine's distinctiveness in refractory schizophrenia, the authors studied the in vivo D(1) and D(2) receptor profile of clozapine compared with other atypical antipsychotics. METHOD: Positron emission tomography with the radioligands [(11)C]SCH23390 and [(11)C]raclopride was used to investigate D(1) and D(2) receptor occupancy in vivo in 25 schizophrenia patients receiving atypical antipsychotic treatment with clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone. RESULTS: Mean striatal D(1) occupancies ranged from 55% with clozapine to 12% with quetiapine (rank order: clozapine > olanzapine > risperidone > quetiapine). The striatal D(2) occupancy ranged from 81% with risperidone to 30% with quetiapine (rank order: risperidone > olanzapine > clozapine > quetiapine). The ratio of striatal D(1)/D(2) occupancy was significantly higher for clozapine (0.88) relative to olanzapine (0.54), quetiapine (0.41), or risperidone (0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Among the atypical antipsychotics, clozapine appears to have a simultaneous and equivalent occupancy of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors. Whether its effect on D(1) receptors represents agonism or antagonism is not yet clear, as this issue is still unresolved in the preclinical arena. This distinctive effect on D(1)/D(2) receptors may be responsible for clozapine's unique effectiveness in patients with schizophrenia refractory to other typical and atypical antipsychotics.     

利培桐合并氯氮平治疗难治性精神分裂症观察

目的 观察利培酮合并氯氮平治疗难治性精神分裂症的疗效。方法 对32例难治性精神分裂症用利培酮2－6mg／日、氯氮平50－250mg/日治疗共12周,入组前及治疗后2、4、8、12周经BPRS评定。结果 两药合并治疗对难治性精神分裂症有效率为46．88％,治疗中无因明显副反应而停药者。结论 两药合并治疗难治性精神分裂症不失为一种有效的治疗方法。     

Efficacy and safety of clozapine and olanzapine: an open-label study comparing two groups of Parkinson's disease patients with dopaminergic-induced psychosis

Clozapine, an atypical neuroleptic agent, improves dopaminergic-induced psychosis in parkinsonian patients without increasing motor disability. However, because of the risk of agranulocytosis periodic hematological controls are mandatory. Olanzapine, another atypical neuroleptic, does not require such monitoring, which may represent a practical advantage. Therefore, for 12weeks we compared the tolerability and efficacy of clozapine and olanzapine in two groups of nine consecutive parkinsonian psychotic patients treated with these compounds. All the patients on clozapine (mean starting dose: 13.1+/-7.9mg/d) completed the study despite reporting a number of adverse events, including somnolence, falls, orthostatic hypotension, and syncope. In contrast, early withdrawal occurred in three of the nine patients receiving olanzapine, due to severe gait deterioration and drowsiness (mean starting dose: 3.9+/-1.3mg/d). Psychotic symptoms improved in both groups, as reflected by a reduction of 71.7% in clozapine and a 61.7% reduction in olanzapine, in five selected items from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. On conclusion of the study, parkinsonism had improved in the clozapine group with a 19.7% decrease in the raw scores and a 7.9% decrease in the weighted scores according to the Cornell University Rating Scale for parkinsonism (mean dose: 16.9+/- 10.3mg/d). Conversely, the six patients receiving olanzapine who finished the study experienced aggravated parkinsonian symptoms, with a 25.5% worsening in the raw scores and a 24.6% worsening in the weighted scores (mean dose: 4.7+/-2.3mg/d). We postulate that the early drop-outs in the olanzapine-treated parkinsonian group may be attributable to a non-specific effect of the drug as a result of starting at too high a dose, and that the worsening of parkinsonism following prolonged treatment may have been caused by the drug's blocking effect on striatal D2 receptors.     

Open trial of risperidone in 24 young children with pervasive developmental disorders

OBJECTIVE: To describe tolerability and efficacy of risperidone in very young children with pervasive developmental disorders. METHOD: Twenty-four children aged 3.6 to 6.6 years (mean 4.6 years +/- 8 months) enrolled during 1999 and 2000 participated in a 16-week open-label trial with risperidone monotherapy. Outcome measures included the Children's Psychiatric Rating Scale (CPRS), Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), and Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS). RESULTS: Two subjects did not complete the trial because of side effects. The optimal dose was 0.5 mg/day. After the treatment a 21% improvement in CPRS and a 14% improvement in CARS total scores was found. Items related to behavioral control (hyperactivity, fidgetiness, rhythmic motions) and affect regulation (lability of affect, angry affect) improved more than 25%. Based on improvement of at least 25% on the CPRS and a score of 1 or 2 on the CGI-I, eight subjects were considered responders. Functional impairment (C-GAS) improved more than 25%. Thirteen subjects (54%) were free of any side effects; in the other participants risperidone was well tolerated. Only three subjects had a weight gain greater than 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose risperidone may positively affect symptoms in young autistic children, improving disruptive/hyperactive behavior and affective dysregulation. Further controlled studies in this age group are warranted.     

氯氮平、利培酮对精神分裂症患者白细胞介素-2的影响

目的 了解氯氮平、利培酮对首发精神分裂症偏执型患者血清白细胞介素-2(IL-2)的影响,并探讨IL-2与精神病理的关系。方法 对58例首发精神分裂症偏执型患者给予氯氮平或利培酮治疗,分别在治疗前和治疗后第4、8周末、6月末用酶联免疫吸附法检测血清IL-2水平,并用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评估精神症状及其变化。结果 两组患者治疗后第4、8周末血清IL-2水平均显著低于治疗前;不同药物对IL-2影响差异无显著性;治疗前IL-2水平与SPANSS总分、阳性症状分呈显著正相关;治疗后8周末血清IL-2减分值与阳性症状减分值呈显著正相关;利培酮组患者治疗后第8周末血清IL-2减分值与利培酮日量呈显著相关。结论 氯氮平和利培酮有相似的免疫抑制作用,血清IL-2与精神分裂症精神病理之间有一定的关系。     

Plasma clozapine levels and clinical response in treatment-refractory Chinese schizophrenic patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical efficacy of clozapine in relation with its plasma level in a group of Chinese patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In addition, the relationship between plasma level and side effects were examined. METHOD: Fifty-one patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were put on a fixed dose of clozapine at 300 mg/day for 6 weeks. Non-responders to week 6 received 500 mg/day in subsequent 6 weeks. Responders to week 6 continued to receive 300 mg/day. Clozapine plasma levels were checked at weeks 6 and 12. FINDINGS: No association was found between clozapine plasma level, response and side effects. Sodium valproate was found to elevate clozapine plasma level while lowering norclozapine/clozapine ratio. CONCLUSION: Clozapine plasma level was not found to be associated with response and side effect in Chinese treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Various explanations were postulated for the lack of relationship observed between clozapine plasma level and response in this population.     

Efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone versus risperidone in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: an 8-week, double-blind, multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: More head-to-head comparisons of antipsychotics are needed to discern the relative efficacy and safety profiles of these compounds. Thus, we compared ziprasidone and risperidone in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD: Patients with DSM-III-R acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were randomly assigned to double-blind ziprasidone 40 to 80 mg b.i.d. (N = 149) or risperidone 3 to 5 mg b.i.d (N = 147) for 8 weeks. Primary efficacy measures included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) score; secondary measures included scores on the PANSS negative sub-scale, CGI-Improvement scale (CGI-I), and PANSS-derived Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRSd) total and core items. Safety assessments included movement disorder evaluations, laboratory tests, electrocardiography, vital signs, and body weight. Efficacy analyses employed a prospectively defined Evaluable Patients cohort. Treatment equivalence was conferred if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the ziprasidone/risperidone ratio of least-squares mean change from baseline was > 0.60. Data were gathered from August 1995 to January 1997. RESULTS: Equivalence was demonstrated in PANSS total scores, CGI-S scores, PANSS negative subscale scores, BPRSd total and core item scores, and PANSS total and CGI-I responder rates. Both agents were well tolerated. Risperidone exhibited a significantly higher Movement Disorder Burden (MDB) score (p < .05) and higher incidences of prolactin elevation and clinically relevant weight gain. However, compared with current recommendations, study dosing may have been high for some risperidone-treated patients (mean dose = 7.4 mg/day) and low for some ziprasidone-treated patients (mean dose = 114.2 mg/day). CONCLUSION: Both agents equally improved psychotic symptoms, and both were generally well tolerated, with ziprasidone demonstrating a lower MDB score and less effect on prolactin and weight than risperidone.