Brain correlates of right-handedness

Recent development of neuroimaging techniques has opened new possibilities for the study of the relation between handedness and the brain functional architecture. Here we report fMRI measurements of dominant and non-dominant hand movement representation in 12 right-handed subjects using block design. We measured possible asymmetry in the total volume of activated neural tissue in the two hemispheres during simple and complex finger movements performed either with the right hand or with the left hand. Simple movements consisted in contraction/extension of the index finger and complex movements in successive finger-thumb opposition from little finger to index finger. A general predominance of left-hemisphere activation relative to right hemisphere activation was found. Increasing the complexity of the motor activity resulted in an enlargement of the volume of consistently activated areas and greater involvement of ipsilateral areas, especially in the left hemisphere. Movements of the dominant hand elicited large contralateral activation (larger than movements of the non-dominant hand) and relatively smaller ipsilateral activation. Movements of the non-dominant hand resulted in a more balanced pattern of activation in the two hemispheres, due to relatively greater ipsilateral activation. This suggests that the dominant (right) hand is controlled mainly by the contralateral (left) hemisphere, whereas the nondominant hand is controlled by both left and right hemispheres. This effect is especially apparent during execution of complex movements. The expansion of brain areas involved in motor control in the hemisphere contralateral to the dominant hand may provide neural substrate for higher efficiency and a greater motor skill repertoire of the preferred hand.     

Post-Stroke Neurological Impairments in Rats with Functional Asymmetry of the Cerebral Hemispheres

Rats with a model of ischemic stroke in the sensorimotor zone of the cortex induced by removal of a fragment of the meninges with their superficial vessels were used to study the effects of the location of focal ischemia in the left and right hemispheres on the severity of neurological deficit. Preliminary testing for food grasping with the forelimb was used to identify the dominant hemisphere, i.e., right-handed and left-handed rats. The functions of the forelimbs were monitored daily for eight weeks in a cylinder test, and a whiskers test and swimming test were also performed. There were no differences in measures on these tests in rats with strokes in the right and left hemispheres throughout the study. In rats with lesions in the dominant hemisphere, recovery of forelimb functions was significantly better than in those with lesions in the non-dominant hemisphere. The link between brain lateralization in rats and the level of recovery of motor function should be taken into account when planning the design of preclinical studies of new agents for the treatment of stroke.     

Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects

 Previous studies have shown that in neurologically normal subjects the addition of trunk motion during a reaching task does not affect the trajectory of the arm endpoint. Typically, the trunk begins to move before the onset and continues to move after the offset of the arm endpoint displacement. This observation shows that the potential contribution of the trunk to the motion of the arm endpoint toward a target is neutralized by appropriate compensatory movements of the shoulder and elbow. We tested the hypothesis that cortical and subcortical brain lesions may disrupt the timing of trunk and arm endpoint motion in hemiparetic subjects. Eight hemiparetic and six age-matched healthy subjects were seated on a stool with the right (dominant) arm in front of them on a table. The tip of the index finger (the arm endpoint) was initially at a distance of 20 cm from the midline of the chest. Wrist, elbow, and upper body positions as well as the coordinates of the arm endpoint were recorded with a three-dimensional motion analysis system (Optotrak) by infrared light-emitting diodes placed on the tip of the finger, the styloid process of the ulna, the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, the acromion processes bilaterally, and the sternal notch. In response to a preparatory signal, subjects lifted their arm 1–2 cm above the table and in response to a ”go” signal moved their endpoint as fast as possible from a near to a far target located at a distance of 35 cm and at a 45° angle to the right or left of the sagittal midline of the trunk. After a pause (200– 500 ms) they moved the endpoint back to the near target. Pointing movements were made without trunk motion (control trials) or with a sagittal motion of the trunk produced by means of a hip flexion or extension (test trials). In one set of test trials, subjects were required to move the trunk forward while moving the arm to the target (”in-phase movements”). In the other set, subjects were required to move the trunk backward when the arm moved to the far target (”out-of-phase movements”). Compared with healthy subjects, movements in hemiparetic subjects were segmented, slower, and characterized by a greater variability and by deflection of the trajectory from a straight line. In addition, there was a moderate increase in the errors in movement direction and extent. These deficits were similar in magnitude whether or not the trunk was involved. Although hemiparetic subjects were able to compensate the influence of the trunk motion on the movement of the arm endpoint, they accomplished this by making more segmented movements than healthy subjects. In addition, they were unable to stabilize the sequence of trunk and arm endpoint movements in a set of trials. It is concluded that recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom may be impaired in this population of patients. This inability may partly be responsible for other deficits observed in hemiparetic subjects, including an increase in movement segmentation and duration. The lack of stereotypic movement sequencing may imply that these subjects had deficits in learning associated with short-term memory. Received: 9 September 1997 / Accepted: 9 October 1998     

Ipsilesional trajectory control is related to contralesional arm paralysis after left hemisphere damage

We have recently shown ipsilateral dynamic deficits in trajectory control are present in left hemisphere damaged (LHD) patients with paresis, as evidenced by impaired modulation of torque amplitude as response amplitude increases. The purpose of the current study is to determine if these ipsilateral deficits are more common with contralateral hemiparesis and greater damage to the motor system, as evidenced by structural imaging. Three groups of right-handed subjects (healthy controls, LHD stroke patients with and without upper extremity paresis) performed single-joint elbow movements of varying amplitudes with their left arm in the left hemispace. Only the paretic group demonstrated dynamic deficits characterized by decreased modulation of peak torque (reflected by peak acceleration changes) as response amplitude increased. These results could not be attributed to lesion volume or peak velocity as neither variable differed across the groups. However, the paretic group had damage to a larger number of areas within the motor system than the non-paretic group suggesting that such damage increases the probability of ipsilesional deficits in dynamic control for modulating torque amplitude after left hemisphere damage.     

Disruption of bilateral temporal coordination during arm swinging in patients with hemiparesis

Persistent motor deficits in the paretic arm present a major barrier to the recovery of the ability to perform bimanual tasks even in individuals who have recovered well after a stroke. Impaired performance may be related to deficits in bimanual temporal coordination due to stroke-related damage of specific brain motor structures as well as changed biomechanics of the paretic arm. To determine the extent of the deficit in bilateral temporal coordination after the stroke, we investigated how bilateral reciprocal coordination was regained after external perturbations of the arm in individuals with hemiparesis due to stroke. We used a bilateral task that would be minimally affected by the unilateral arm motor deficit. Nine non-disabled control subjects and 12 individuals with chronic hemiparesis performed reciprocal (anti-phase) arm swinging in the standing position for 15 s per trial. In each trial, movement of one arm was unexpectedly and transiently (~150–350 ms) arrested at the level of the wrist once in the forward and once in the backward phase of swinging. Perturbation was applied to the left and right arms in control subjects and to the paretic and non-paretic arms of individuals with hemiparesis. Kinematic data from endpoint markers on both hands and electromyographic activity of anterior and posterior deltoid muscles from both arms were recorded. The oscillatory period, the phase differences between arms and the mean EMG activity before, during and after perturbation were analyzed. In both groups the perturbation altered the period of the perturbed cycle in both the arrested and non-arrested arms and resulted in a change from anti-phase to in-phase coordination, following which anti-phase coordination was regained. Recovery of anti-phase swinging took significantly longer in patients with hemiparesis compared to control subjects. Stable pre-perturbed (anti-phase) reciprocal coordination was regained within one cycle following perturbation for the control subjects and within two cycles following perturbation for the patients with hemiparesis. Analysis of EMG activation levels showed that, compared to control subjects, there was significantly less activation of the shoulder muscles in response to perturbation in the patient group and the pattern of muscle activation in the paretic arm was opposite to that in the non-paretic and control arms. The finding that patients had a reduced capacity for maintaining and restoring the required reciprocal coordination when perturbation occurred suggests that stroke-related brain damage in our patients led to instability of bilateral temporal coordination for this rhythmical task.     

Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis

Multijoint movements such as reaching are impaired after brain lesions involving sensorimotor areas and pathways. However, the mechanisms by which such lesions affect motor control are not fully understood. Direct effects of the lesion may be partly compensated by both the system's redundancy and its plasticity. Indeed stroke patients with limited arm movement can reach objects placed within the reach of the arm by using a compensatory strategy involving trunk recruitment. A similar strategy is observed in healthy individuals reaching for objects placed beyond the reach of the arm. Determining the control mechanism(s) governing this compensatory strategy in stroke patients was the goal of this study. Kinematics of reaching movements in hemiparetic and healthy participants to targets placed within and beyond the length of the arm were analysed. Targets were placed sagittally in front of the midline of the body. Two targets (targets 1 and 2) were within reaching distance defined as the length of the stretched arm from axilla to wrist crease. Two others were beyond arm's reach so that one required a forward trunk inclination (target 3) and the other required body raising to a semi-standing position (target 4). Healthy participants used minimal trunk displacement for reaches to targets 1 and 2. For reaches to targets 3 and 4, trunk displacement increased with target distance. Whenever the trunk was involved, there was a stereotyped sequential recruitment of the arm and trunk in that the trunk began moving simultaneously with or before the hand and stopped moving after the end of hand movement. This suggested that the control system predicts that the trunk movement will be needed to extend the reach and includes the trunk, in an anticipatory way, into the reach. In contrast, most hemiparetic participants recruited their trunk for reaches to all four targets, even those placed close to the body. Similar to healthy individuals, the sequence of hand and trunk recruitment was stereotyped, suggesting that temporal planning aspects of the motor program underlying movement coordination were relatively unaffected. In contrast to healthy participants, the contribution of the trunk movement to the endpoint displacement was substantially higher in the hemiparetic group and occurred earlier in the reach. It is suggested that the target distance at which the trunk is integrated into the movement to extend the reach of the arm is attained around the limit of arm extension and that this limit is reduced in hemiparetic individuals.     

Influence of the side of brain damage on postural upper-limb control including the scapula in stroke patients

Following stroke, control of both the contralesional (paretic) and ipsilesional (less affected) arms is altered. The purpose of this study was to analyse the consequences of stroke on joint rotations of both shoulder girdles, that is, glenohumeral (GH) and scapula motion. Because of hemispheric specialization, we hypothesized that changes would relate to the side of hemisphere damage. Nine stroke patients with left, and 9 with right hemisphere damage (LHD and RHD) and 9 healthy subjects were included. Reaching movements to targets positioned close, far and high in three directions were recorded using an electromagnetic system. Initial and final postures of the scapula, GH and elbow joint were evaluated. Inter-joint rotations throughout the movements were analysed using principal component analysis (PCA). The main finding was that initial and final postures of the contralesional and ipsilesional shoulders differed depending on the side of brain lesion. On the contralesional side, there was less scapula protraction and GH lateral rotation for both groups. Scapula tilt was less anterior in LHD patients, and GH elevation was greater in RHD patients. On the ipsilesional side, GH lateral rotation was reduced in both groups, and scapula protraction was reduced only for LHD patients. PCA confirmed that postures of both shoulders of the LHD group were substantially different to the healthy subjects, while only the contralesional arm of the RHD subjects differed. These results add to existing knowledge of hemispheric specialization, suggesting that the left hemisphere plays a greater role in bilateral joint postures than the right hemisphere.     

Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information

Previous findings from our laboratory support the idea that the dominant arm is more proficient than the non-dominant arm in coordinating intersegmental dynamics for specifying trajectory direction and shape during multijoint reaching movements. We also showed that adaptation of right and left arms to novel visuomotor rotations was equivalent, suggesting that this process occurs upstream to processes that distinguish dominant and non-dominant arm performance. Because of this, we speculate that such visuomotor adaptations might transfer to subsequent performance during adaptation with the other arm. We now examine whether opposite arm training to novel visuomotor rotations transfers to affect adaptation using the right and left arms. Two subject groups, RL and LR, each comprising seven right-handed subjects, adapted to a 30 degrees counterclockwise rotation in the visual display during a center-out reaching task performed in eight directions. Each group first adapted using either the right (RL) or left (LR) arm, followed by opposite arm adaptation. In order to assess transfer, we compared the same side arm movements (either right or left) following opposite arm adaptation to those performed prior to opposite arm adaptation. Our findings indicate unambiguous transfer of learning across the arms. Different features of movement transferred in different directions: Opposite arm training improved the initial direction of right arm movements under the rotated visual condition, whereas opposite arm training improved the final position accuracy, but not the direction of left arm movements. These findings confirm that transfer of training was not due to a general cognitive strategy, since such an effect should influence either hand equally. These findings support the hypothesis that each arm controller has access to information learned during opposite arm training. We suggest that each controller uses this information differently, depending on its proficiency for specifying particular features of movement. We discuss evidence that these two aspects of control are differentially mediated by the right and left cerebral hemispheres.     

Vestibular contribution to combined arm and trunk motion

Recent studies have shown that the hand-pointing movements within arm's reach remain invariant whether the trunk is recruited or not or its motion is unexpectedly prevented. This suggests the presence of compensatory arm-trunk coordination minimizing the deflections of the hand from the intended trajectory. It has been postulated that vestibular signals elicited by the trunk motion and transmitted to the arm motor system play a major role in the compensation. One prediction of this hypothesis is that vestibular stimulation should influence arm posture and movement during reaching. It has been demonstrated that galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) can influence the direction of pointing movements when body motion is restrained. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of GVS on trunk-assisted pointing movements. Subjects either moved the hand to a target or maintained a steady-state posture near the target, while moving the trunk forward with the eyes closed. When GVS was applied, the final position of the hand was deviated in the lateral and sagittal direction in both tasks. This was the result of two independent effects: a deviation of the trunk trajectory and a modification of the arm position relative to the trunk. Thus, the vestibular system might be directly involved not only in the control of trunk motion but also in the arm-trunk coordination during trunk-assisted reaching movements. Electronic Publication     

Speech-induced modulation of interhemispheric inhibition

This study aimed to determine the effects of speech and mastication on interhemispheric inhibition between the right and left primary motor areas (M1s) by using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the first dorsal interossei (FDIs) of each hand of 10 healthy right-handed subjects under 3 conditions: at rest (control), during mastication (non-verbal oral movement), and during speech (reading aloud). Test TMS was delivered following conditioning TMS of the contralateral M1 at various interstimulus intervals. Under all conditions, the MEPs in the left FDIs were significantly inhibited after conditioning of the left M1 (i.e. inhibition of the right M1 by TMS of the left hemisphere). In contrast, the left M1 was significantly inhibited by the right hemisphere only during the control and mastication tasks, but not speech task. These results suggest that speech may facilitate the activity of the dominant M1 via functional connectivity between the speech area and the left M1, or may modify the balance of interhemispheric interactions, by suppressing inhibition of the dominant hemisphere by the non-dominant hemisphere. Our findings show a novel aspect of interhemispheric dominance and may improve therapeutic strategies for recovery from stroke.     

Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke

The effects of short-term, constant practice on the kinematics of a multi-joint pointing movement were studied in the hemiparetic arm of 20 chronic patients with unilateral left cerebro-vascular accident (CVA) and in 10 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals. Practice consisted of a single session of 70 pointing movements made with the right arm. Movements were made from a target located beside the body to one in the contralateral workspace, in front of the body. Vision of the final hand position was allowed after every 5^th trial. At the beginning of practice, stroke patients made slower, less precise and more segmented movements, characterised by smaller active ranges of elbow and shoulder motion, disrupted elbow–shoulder coordination, as well as greater trunk movement compared with healthy subjects. With practice, healthy subjects and some patients made faster and more precise movements. These tendencies were revealed only after many repetitions (up to 55 for those with severe hemiparesis), whereas changes in healthy individuals occurred after fewer trials (approximately 20). In addition, the patients decreased movement segmentation with practice. In healthy subjects, faster movement times may be attributed to better shoulder/elbow movement timing in the first half of the reach, whereas improvement of precision was not correlated with any changes in the movement variables. In patients, improvements were accomplished differently depending on arm motor severity. For some patients with mild-to-moderate clinical symptoms, practice resulted in better timing of shoulder/elbow movements with less trunk rotation in middle to late reach. Patients with more severe impairment also improved shoulder/elbow movement timing in mid-reach but used more compensatory trunk rotation. The results suggest that even one session of repetitive practice of a multi-joint pointing task leads to improvements in movement performance-based outcome measures, but the mechanisms of improvement may vary with the individual's level of motor impairment.     

Superposition of independent units of coordination during pointing movements involving the trunk with and without visual feedback

Previous studies addressing the problem of the control of multiple degrees of freedom have examined the influence of trunk movement on pointing movements within the arm's reach. Such movements may be controlled by two functionally independent units of coordination (synergies): one involving only arm joints and producing the hand trajectory to the target (the transport synergy), and the other coordinating trunk and arm movements leaving the hand trajectory unchanged (the compensatory synergy). The question of whether or not this functional subdivision depends on visual feedback was addressed in the present study. We also tested whether or not the motor effects of different synergies are summated as independent components, a control strategy called "superposition." Finally, we investigated whether or not the relationship between different degrees of freedom within each synergy could be considered linear resulting in proportional changes in different joint angles. Seated subjects produced fast, uncorrected arm movements to an ipsi- or a contralateral target in the direction of +/-45 degrees to the sagittal midline of the trunk. Targets could be reached using the arm alone (control trials) or by combining the arm motion with a forward or backward trunk motion produced by hip flexion or extension (test trials), with and without visual feedback. The shape of the hand trajectory, its direction and tangential velocity, movement precision, joint angles and the sequence of the trunk and hand recruitment and de-recruitment were measured. In both visual conditions, the direction of the hand trajectory observed in control trials was generally preserved in test trials. In terms of sequencing, even in the absence of vision, the trunk movement was initiated before the onset of and outlasted the hand shift, indicating that the potential influence of the trunk on the hand movement was compensated by rotations in the elbow and shoulder joint. The analysis of other variables also implied that the effects of trunk recruitment on the hand trajectory were minor compared to those which could be observed if these effects were not compensated by appropriate changes in the arm joint angles. It was concluded that an arm-trunk compensatory synergy is present in pointing movements regardless of visual feedback. Principal component analysis showed that the relationship between elbow, shoulder and hip joint angles in individual arm and combined arm-trunk movements cannot be considered linear, implying that this relationship is adjusted according to the changing arm geometry. The changes in each arm joint angle (elbow, shoulder) elicited by a forward trunk bending in one block of trials were compared with those elicited by a backward bending in another block, whereas the hand moved to the same target in both blocks. These changes were opposite but of similar magnitude. As a result, for each moment of movement, the mean joint angle obtained by averaging across two directions of trunk motion was practically identical to that in control trials in which the trunk was motionless. It is concluded that the transport and arm-trunk compensatory synergies are combined as independent units, according to the principle of superposition. This principle may simplify the control of the coordination of a redundant number of degrees of freedom.     

Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements

Insight into the functional neural substrates associated with the control of goal-directed purposive movements can be obtained through the study of the performance of individuals with brain damage. The control of rapid reciprocal aiming was investigated by comparing ipsilateral limb performance of subjects with unilateral brain damage to that of controls performing with the same limb. Thirty right-hand-dominant individuals, ten with right hemisphere stroke, ten with left hemisphere stroke, and ten age-matched controls performed unconstrained alternating tapping movements under three conditions of task complexity. The path of the stylus was recorded by video using two-dimensional kinematic techniques. Key kinematic features of the vertical and horizontal components of the trajectories were analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. All subjects with brain damage showed prolonged movement times; however, the locus of the slowing depended on lesion side. Specifically, subjects with left stroke showed deficits in the open-loop component of the movement across all three conditions of task complexity, and a prolonged reversal phase surrounding target impact, particularly in the most complex condition. In contrast, subjects with right stroke showed deficits in the closed-loop phase of the movement prior to target impact, particularly in the most complex condition when visual information was necessary for accuracy. Together, these results suggest that for the control of rapid goal-directed aiming movements, the left hemisphere is dominant for task-relevant aspects of processing associated with the ballistic component and the timing or triggering of sequential movements. In contrast, the right hemisphere is dominant for processing associated with rapid, on-line visual information even when target location is known and direction is certain.     

Imagined actions in multiple sclerosis patients: evidence of decline in motor cognitive prediction

Motor imagery is a mental process during which subjects internally simulate a movement without any motor output. Mental and actual movement durations are similar in healthy adults (isochrony) while temporal discrepancies (anisochrony) could be an expression of neurological deficits on action representation. It is unclear whether patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) preserve the capacity to simulate their own movements. This study investigates the ability of PwMS to predict their own actions by comparing temporal features of dominant and non-dominant actual and mental actions. Fourteen PwMS and nineteen healthy subjects (HS) were asked to execute and to imagine pointing arm movements among four pairs of targets of different sizes. Task duration was calculated for both actual and mental movements by an optoelectronic device. Results showed temporal consistency and target-by-target size modulation in actual movements through the four cycles for both groups with significantly longer actual and mental movement durations in PwMS with respect to HS. An index of performance (IP) was used to examine actual/mental isochrony properties in the two groups. Statistical analysis on IP showed in PwMS significantly longer actual movement durations with respect to mental movement durations (anisochrony), more relevant for the non-dominant than dominant arm. Mental prediction of motor actions is not well preserved in MS where motor and cognitive functional changes are present. Differences in performing imagined task with dominant and non-dominant arm could be related to increased cognitive effort required for performing non-dominant movements.     

Postural adjustments for online corrections of arm movements in standing humans

The aim of this study was to investigate how humans correct ongoing arm movements while standing. Specifically, we sought to understand whether the postural adjustments in the legs required for online corrections of arm movements are predictive or rely on feedback from the moving limb. To answer this question we measured online corrections in arm and leg muscles during pointing movements while standing. Nine healthy right-handed subjects reached with their dominant arm to a visual target in front of them and aligned with their midline. In some trials, the position of the target would switch from the central target to one of the other targets located 15°, 30°, or 45° to the right of the central (midline) target. For each target correction, we measured the time at which arm kinematics, ground reaction forces, and arm and leg muscle electromyogram significantly changed in response to the target displacement. Results show that postural adjustments in the left leg preceded kinematic corrections in the limb. The corrective postural muscle activity in the left leg consistently preceded the corrective reaching muscle activity in the right arm. Our results demonstrate that corrections of arm movements in response to target displacement during stance are preceded by postural adjustments in the leg contralateral to the direction of target shift. Furthermore, postural adjustments preceded both the hand trajectory correction and the arm-muscle activity responsible for it, which suggests that the central nervous system does not depend on feedback from the moving arm to modify body posture during voluntary movement. Instead, postural adjustments lead the online correction in the arm the same way they lead the initiation of voluntary arm movements. This suggests that forward models for voluntary movements executed during stance incorporate commands for posture that are produced on the basis of the required task demands.     

Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke

A technique is described that characterizes the dynamics of the interjoint coordination of arm reaching movements in healthy subjects (n=10) and in patients who had sustained a left-sided cerebrovascular accident (n=18). All participants were right-handed. Data from the affected right arm of patients with stroke were compared with those from the right arm of healthy subjects. Seated subjects made 25 pointing movements in a single session. Movements were made from an initial target located ipsilaterally to the right arm beside the body, to a final target located in front of the subject in the contralateral arm workspace. Kinematic data from the finger, wrist, elbow, both shoulders and sternum were recorded in three dimensions at 200 Hz with an optical tracking system. Analysis of interjoint coordination was based on the patterns of temporal delay between rotations at two adjacent joints (shoulder and elbow). The data were reduced to a single graph (Temporal Coordination or TC index) integrating the essential temporal characteristics of joint movement (the angular displacements, velocities and timing). TC segments, duration and amplitude, were analysed. The analysis was sensitive to the differences in interjoint coordination between healthy subjects and patients with arm motor deficits. In patients, the temporal coordination between elbow and shoulder movements was disrupted from the middle to the end of the reach. More specifically, in mid-reach, all patients had difficulty coordinating elbow flexion with shoulder horizontal adduction. In addition, patients with severe arm hemiparesis had difficulty changing elbow movement direction from flexion to extension and in coordinating this change with shoulder movement. At the end of the reach, patients with severe hemiparesis had deficits in the execution of elbow extension while all patients had impaired coordination of elbow extension and shoulder horizontal adduction. In addition, active ranges of joint motions were significantly decreased in the stroke compared to the healthy subjects. Finally, TC analysis revealed significant relationships between specific aspects of disrupted interjoint coordination and the level of motor impairment, suggesting that it may be a useful tool in the identification of specific movement coordination deficits in neurological impaired populations that can be targeted in treatment for arm motor recovery.     

Side of symptom onset affects motor dysfunction in Parkinson's disease

The healthy brain appears to have an asymmetric dopamine distribution, with higher levels of dopamine in the left than in the right striatum. Here, we test the hypothesis that this neurochemical asymmetry renders the right striatum relatively more vulnerable to the effects of dopaminergic denervation in Parkinson's disease (PD). Using the pegboard dexterity test, we compared motor performance of both hands between healthy subjects (n=48), PD patients with predominantly right-hemispheric dopamine depletion (PD-RIGHT; n=83) and PD patients with more severe left-hemispheric dopamine depletion (PD-LEFT; n=103). All subjects were right-handed. After adjusting for hand-dominance effects, we found that PD-RIGHT patients exhibited a 55% larger difference between right and left dexterity scores than PD-LEFT patients. This effect could be attributed to greater motor dysfunction of the more-affected hand in PD-RIGHT patients, while the less-affected hand performed similarly in both groups. We conclude that the side of symptom onset affects motor dysfunction in PD, and suggest that the non-dominant right hemisphere may be more susceptible to dopaminergic denervation than the dominant left hemisphere.     

On the regularity of preparatory activity preceding movements with the dominant and non-dominant hand: A readiness potential study

The readiness potential (RP), a slow negative electroencephalographic pre-movement potential, was reported to commence earlier for movements with the non-dominant left hand than with the dominant right hand. Latencies in these reports were always calculated from averaged RPs, whereas onset times of individual trials remained inaccessible. The aim was to use a new statistical approach to examine whether a few left hand trials with very early pre-movement activity disproportionally affect the onset of the average. We recorded RPs in 28 right-handed subjects while they made self-paced repetitive unilateral movements with their dominant and non-dominant hand. Skewness, a measure of distribution asymmetry, was analysed in sets of single-trial RPs to discriminate between a symmetric distribution and an asymmetric distribution containing outlier trials with early onset. Results show that for right hand movements skewness has values around zero across electrodes and pre-movement intervals, whereas for left hand movements skewness has initially negative values which increase to neutral values closer to movement onset. This indicates a symmetric (e.g., Gaussian) distribution of onset times across trials for simple right hand movements, whereas cortical activation preceding movements with the non-dominant hand is characterised by outlier trials with early onset of negativity. These findings may explain differences in the averaged brain activation preceding dominant versus non-dominant hand movements described in previous electrophysiological/neuroimaging studies. The findings also constrain mental chronometry, a technique that makes conclusions upon the time and temporal order of brain processes by measuring and comparing onset times of averaged electroencephalographic potentials evoked by these processes.     

Neurophysiological correlates of word and pseudo-word processing in well-recovered aphasics and patients with right-hemispheric stroke

Neurophysiological correlates of language recovery after stroke were investigated. Neurological patients with single focal lesions in their left or right hemisphere and healthy control subjects made lexical decisions on written words and pseudo-words while EEG responses were recorded. At the time of testing, patients did not show clinically apparent language dysfunction, although those with left-hemisphere lesions had suffered from aphasia in the first months after their stroke. A P3-like positive deflection of the event-related potential (ERP) was reduced in the patients relative to healthy controls, this reduction being most pronounced over the hemisphere affected by stroke. Consistent with earlier research, healthy control subjects showed more positive ERPs to words than to pseudo-words. This pattern was reversed in both patient groups, where words elicited more negative-going ERPs than pseudo-words already 160-320 ms after stimulus onset. Because ERPs showed between-group differences only for words, these word-specific neurophysiological signatures altered in stroke patients with well-recovered language functions may be a correlate of cortical lesions or an index of reorganization of language after stroke.     

Cortico-cortical networks in patients with ideomotor apraxia as revealed by EEG coherence analysis

We sought to determine whether coherent networks which circumvent lesioned cortex are seen in patients with ideomotor apraxia (IMA) while performing tool-use pantomimes. Five normal subjects and five patients with IMA (three patients with corticobasal degeneration and two with left hemisphere stroke) underwent 64-channel EEG recording while performing three tool-use pantomimes with their left hand in a self-paced manner. Beta band (20-22 Hz) coherence indicates that normal subjects have a dominant left hemisphere network responsible for praxis preparation, which was absent in patients. Corticobasal degeneration patients showed significant coherence increase between left parietal-right premotor areas. Left hemisphere stroke patients showed significant coherence increases in a right parietofrontal network. The right hemisphere appears to store useable praxis representations in IMA patients with left hemisphere damage.