Heparin-coated circuits (Duraflo II) with reduced versus full anticoagulation during coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND: Introduction of completely heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits combined with reduced systemic anticoagulation has been shown to reduce postoperative bleeding and requirements for allogeneic transfusions after cardiac surgery. However, some uncertainty exists whether this effect is due to the reduced amount of heparin or to the heparinized surface itself. Therefore, a retrospective study was undertaken, comparing two different anticoagulation protocols applied to coronary artery bypass patients treated with identical heparin-coated CPB equipment. METHOD: Over a 12 month period all coronary artery bypass patients operated with extracorporeal circulation were subjected to a Duraflo II heparin-coated circuit (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Bentley Laboratories Division, Irvine, Calif) and full heparin dose (activated clotting time [ACT] > 480 seconds; Group F, n = 651). Over the next 24 months, all coronary patients who were treated with an identical circuit combined with reduced systemic heparinization (ACT > 250 seconds) were included in Group R (n = 675). Except for the different anticoagulation protocols, all treatment regimens before, during, and after the operation remained unchanged throughout the study period. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in any major demographic or operative parameters. In Group R, the postoperative bleeding was mean 665 +/- 257 ml versus 757 +/- 367 ml in Group F (p < 0.0001), and the perioperative decrease in hemoglobin concentration was significantly lower in Group R (22 +/- 1.2 gm/L versus 25 +/- 1.3 gm/L, p < 0.0001). The time for postoperative ventilatory support was shorter in Group R (1.7 +/- 1.3 hours versus 1.9 +/- 1.1 hours in Group F, p = 0.0006), and the incidence of new episodes of atrial fibrillation after the operation was lower (26.4% in Group R versus 32.8% in Group F, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the incidences of perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, transient neurological disturbances, physical rehabilitation, or mortality. No technical or coagulation problems were recorded in either group. CONCLUSION: The use of Duraflo II coated circuits for CPB combined with reduced anticoagulation decrease postoperative bleeding and hemoglobin loss compared with full heparin dose treatment. In addition, the intubation time was shorter and the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was lower in the patients treated with low heparin doses.     

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduce blood cell trauma. Experiments in the pig

Blood cell trauma and postoperative bleeding remain important problems in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared heparin-coated with non-coated circuits in the pig. Twenty animals were perfused for 2 h at normothermia using membrane oxygenators (Bentley Bos 50). Two groups were studied. In the non-coated group (NC, n = 11) the CPB circuits used were without a heparin coating. This group had systemic heparinization of 400 IU/kg to maintain an ACT (activated clotting time) of over 400 s during CPB. In the coated group (C, n = 9), all surfaces exposed to blood in the CPB circuits were heparin-coated. This group had the heparin dose reduced to 25% (100 IU/kg) without further administration regardless of ACT. During CPB, group C displayed shorter ACT (per definition), higher platelet count, platelet adhesion and lower fibrinolysis and haemolysis (P less than 0.05) as compared to group NC. No thromboembolic events were detected during CPB. Three animals in group NC and 4 animals in group C were weaned from CPB and protaminized. Four hours postoperatively, the leucocyte consumption was two-fold greater and blood loss about four-fold greater in group NC as compared with group C (P less than 0.05). Perfusion with heparin-coated surfaces reduces blood cell trauma. The decreased postoperative blood loss observed in group C is probably explained by the reduced dosages of heparin and protamine.     

Heparin-coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Abstract: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a nonphysiologic environment for an organism. The damage of blood components may also lead to organ dysfunction, sometimes recognized as postperfusion syndrome. One possible way to diminish the risk of these complications would be to reduce the thorombogenicity and to improve the biocompatibility of the artificial surfaces by using a heparin-coated CPB circuit. In this study, we compared a heparin-coated CPB circuit with a noncoated CPB circuit in terms of biocompatibility in 20 patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery. We employed a Dura-flo II (n = 10) as a heparin-coated CPB circuit and a Univox IC (n = 10) as control subjects. Ten patients (Group C) were operated on using the heparin-coated CPB circuit. A total of 10 patients were given heparin in a reduced dose (2.0 mg/kg), and additional heparin was given if the activated clotting time (ACT) was below 400 s. The control group also included 10 patients (Group NC), who were operated on with noncoated devices. They received 2.5 mg/kg of heparin, and additional heparin was given if the ACT was below 450 s. All patients had normal coagulation parameters and did not receive blood transfusion. We measured complement activation levels (C3a, C4a), platelet count, thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels, D-dimer levels, and ACT during CPB and respiratory index postoperatively. The concentration of C3a in group NC was significantly higher than that in group C. Platelet reduction in group NC was significantly greater than that in group C. There were no significant differences in the remaining parameters between the 2 groups. We concluded that heparin-coated CPB circuits improved biocompatibility by reducing complement activation and platelet consumption and enabled us to reduce the dose of heparin required for systemic heparinization.     

Heparin dosing and monitoring for cardiopulmonary bypass. A comparison of techniques with measurement of subclinical plasma coagulation

Subclinical plasma coagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass has been associated with marked platelet and clotting factor consumption in monkeys. To better define subclinical coagulation in man, we measured plasma fibrinopeptide A concentrations before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients were assigned to one of three groups of heparin management: group 1 (n = 10)--initial heparin dose 300 IU/kg, with supplemental heparin if the activated coagulation time fell below 400 seconds; group 2 (n = 6)--initial heparin dose 250 IU/kg, with supplemental heparin if activated coagulation time was less than 400 seconds; and group 3 (n = 5)--initial heparin dose 350 to 400 IU/kg, with supplemental heparin if whole blood heparin concentration was less than or equal to 4.1 IU/ml. Activated coagulation time and heparin concentration were measured every 30 minutes during cardiopulmonary bypass, and fibrinopeptide A was measured at hypothermia, normothermia, and whenever activated coagulation time was less than 400 seconds. Quantitative and qualitative blood clotting competence was assessed after cardiopulmonary bypass, including mediastinal drainage for the first 24 hours. Fibrinopeptide A values were markedly elevated during cardiopulmonary bypass but were well below the levels present before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Fibrinopeptide A correlated inversely with heparin concentration during cardiopulmonary bypass (r = -0.46, p = 0.03), but higher fibrinopeptide A levels during cardiopulmonary bypass did not correlate with post-cardiopulmonary bypass coagulopathy. Group 3 patients received the highest heparin doses (p less than 0.05) and had the greatest postoperative blood loss (p less than 0.05). Protamine dose and heparin concentration during cardiopulmonary bypass correlated best with postoperative mediastinal drainage. Our findings support the following conclusions: (1) compensated subclinical plasma coagulation activity occurs during cardiopulmonary bypass despite activated coagulation time greater than 400 seconds or heparin concentration greater than or equal to 4.1 IU/ml; (2) post-cardiopulmonary bypass mediastinal drainage correlates strongly with increased heparin concentration during cardiopulmonary bypass (p less than 0.05) and protamine dose (p less than 0.05); and (3) during cardiopulmonary bypass at both normothermia and hypothermia, activated coagulation times greater than 350 seconds result in acceptable fibrinopeptide A levels and post-cardiopulmonary bypass blood clotting.     

Use of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit with low-dose heparin reduces postoperative bleeding.

Postoperative bleeding was examined in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass with a heparin-coated circuit and low-dose heparin. Out of 150 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass for longer than 90 minutes, 74 received a standard dose (300 IU/kg) of heparin with an uncoated circuit (group C) and 76 received a low-dose (150 IU/kg) of heparin with a heparin-coated circuit (group H). The coagulation and fibrinolytic systems were investigated in 24 patients. Re-opening of the chest due to bleeding was performed in 5 patients in group C (7%), but none of the patients in group H (p=0. 03). The median of blood loss in the first 12 hours after surgery was 292 ml in group C, and 216 ml in group H (p=0.006). There were no significant differences in the peak thrombin-antithrombin complex concentration between the two groups. The plasmin-alpha 2 plasmin inhibitor complex concentrations after protamine administration were 1.9 ng/ml (median) in group C and 1.1 ng/ml in group H (p=0.002). The use of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with low-dose heparin suppressed the activation of fibrinolysis. This may explain the reduction in postoperative bleeding.     

Use of heparin-bonded circuits in cardiopulmonary bypass improves clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE: The use of heparin-coated surfaces in cardiopulmonary bypass has been shown to decrease the inflammatory response imposed by the contact between blood and artificial surfaces. One would expect this reaction to improve clinical outcome. However, this has been difficult to verify. This investigation is based on an aggregation of two randomized studies from our institution and highlights possible effects of heparin coating on a number of clinically oriented parameters. DESIGN: Departmental analysis of patients subjected to coronary artery bypass surgery using heparin-coated circuits. Cardiopulmonary bypass was employed using either the Carmeda or Duraflo heparin coatings compared with a control. The systemic heparin dose was reduced in the heparin-coated groups (ACT > 250 s) vs control group patients (ACT > 480 s). The effects of heparin coating related to clinical outcome were studied. RESULTS: The use of heparin-coated circuits reduced the mean length of stay in hospital from 7.8 +/- 2.5 to 7.3 +/- 1.8 days (p = 0.040) and postoperative ventilation time from 9.7 +/- 9.2 to 8.2 +/- 8.5 h (p = 0.018), blood loss 8 h post surgery from 676 +/- 385 to 540 +/- 245 ml (p = 0.001), individual perioperative change of haemoglobin loss (p = 0.001), leukocyte count (p = 0.000) and creatinine elevation (p = 0.000), proportion of patients exposed to allogenous blood transfusions 39.2 vs 23.9% (p = 0.001), postoperative coagulation disturbances 4.4 vs 0.4% (p = 0.006), postoperative deviations from the normal postoperative course 47.2 vs 36.7% (p = 0.035), neurological deviations 9.4 vs 3.9% (p = 0.021) and atrial fibrillation 26.4 vs 18.0% (p = 0.041). No effects were found with respect to perioperative platelet count, postoperative fever reaction and 5-year survival. CONCLUSION: Based on several indicators, the use of heparin coating in cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with improved clinical results.     

Effects of Duraflo II heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on the coagulation system, endothelial damage, and cytokine release in patients with cardiac operation employing aprotinin and steroids

The effects of Duraflo II heparin coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits, low-dose aprotinin, and steroids on the coagulation system, endothelial damage, and cytokine release were evaluated by comparing those treated with low-dose aprotinin and steroids. Twenty-four adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, or valve repair surgery were randomly assigned to 2 groups: either heparin-coated (Duraflo group, n = 12) or noncoated equipment (noncoated group, n = 12) groups. In the Duraflo group, the cardiopulmonary reservoir was also coated with heparin. There were no significant differences in age at the time of operation, aortic cross-clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and rectal temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass. Standard systemic heparinization was performed. Methylpredonisolone and low-dose aprotinin were given in both groups of patients. Serum XIIa factor, TAT, and IL-6 were significantly higher in the control group than in the Duraflo group during cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.01). Serum IL-8 was significantly higher in the control group than in the Duraflo group at 24 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in serum thrombomodulin and TNF-alpha; both were within normal during the study period. These results indicate that the use of Duraflo II heparin coated equipment and a heparin-coated cardiopulmonary reservoir suppressed excess coagulation and inflammatory reaction induced by cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Use of Heparin-bonded Circuits in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Improves Clinical Outcome

Objective : The use of heparin-coated surfaces in cardiopulmonary bypass has been shown to decrease the inflammatory response imposed by the contact between blood and artificial surfaces. One would expect this reaction to improve clinical outcome. However, this has been difficult to verify. This investigation is based on an aggregation of two randomized studies from our institution and highlights possible effects of heparin coating on a number of clinically oriented parameters. Design : Departmental analysis of patients subjected to coronary artery bypass surgery using heparin-coated circuits. Cardiopulmonary bypass was employed using either the Carmeda or Duraflo heparin coatings compared with a control. The systemic heparin dose was reduced in the heparin-coated groups (ACT > 250 s) vs control group patients (ACT > 480 s). The effects of heparin coating related to clinical outcome were studied. Results : The use of heparin-coated circuits reduced the mean length of stay in hospital from 7.8 &#45 2.5 to 7.3 &#45 1.8 days ( p = 0.040) and postoperative ventilation time from 9.7 &#45 9.2 to 8.2 &#45 8.5 h ( p = 0.018), blood loss 8 h post surgery from 676 &#45 385 to 540 &#45 245 ml ( p = 0.001), individual perioperative change of haemoglobin loss ( p = 0.001), leukocyte count ( p = 0.000) and creatinine elevation ( p = 0.000), proportion of patients exposed to allogenous blood transfusions 39.2 vs 23.9% ( p = 0.001), postoperative coagulation disturbances 4.4 vs 0.4% ( p = 0.006), postoperative deviations from the normal postoperative course 47.2 vs 36.7% ( p = 0.035), neurological deviations 9.4 vs 3.9% ( p = 0.021) and atrial fibrillation 26.4 vs 18.0% ( p = 0.041). No effects were found with respect to perioperative platelet count, postoperative fever reaction and 5-year survival. Conclusion : Based on several indicators, the use of heparin coating in cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with improved clinical results.     

Reduction and elimination of systemic heparinization during cardiopulmonary bypass.

After extensive experimental evaluation, heparin-coated perfusion equipment was clinically evaluated with low or no systemic heparinization in three different groups of patients (n = 47). In group 1, resection of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (n = 24) was performed with heparin-coated equipment used for left heart bypass (n = 12) or partial cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 12) for proximal unloading and distal protection (heparin 5000 IU, autotransfusion). All devices remained functional throughout the procedures and no systemic emboli were detected. The sole death (1 of 24, 4%) occurred in a patient with ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm requiring operation in extremis. Paraparesis with spontaneous recovery occurred in one patient (1 of 24, 4%). In group 2, coronary artery revascularization randomized for low (activated clotting time greater than 180 seconds) versus full (activated clotting time greater than 480 seconds) systemic heparinization was prospectively analyzed in 22 patients. All patients recovered without sequelae, and no myocardial infarction was diagnosed. Low dose of heparin (8041 +/- 1270 IU versus 52,500 +/- 17,100 IU; p less than 0.0005) resulted in reduced protamine requirements (7875 +/- 1918 IU versus 31,400 +/- 14,000 IU; p less than 0.0005), reduced blood loss (831 +/- 373 ml versus 2345 +/- 1815 ml; p less than 0.01), reduced transfusion requirements of homologous blood products (281 +/- 415 ml versus 2731 +/- 2258 ml; p less than 0.001), and less patients transfused (5 of 12 versus 10 of 10; p less than 0.05). Lower D-dimer levels in the group perfused with low systemic heparinization (0.50 +/- 0.43 mg/L versus 1.08 +/- 0.59 mg/L; p less than 0.05) were attributed to the absence of cardiotomy suction in this group. In group 3, rewarming in accidental hypothermia by cardiopulmonary bypass was successfully performed without systemic heparinization in a patient with hypothermic cardiac arrest (23.3 degrees C) and intracranial trauma. We conclude that systemic heparinization for clinical cardiopulmonary bypass can be reduced and eliminated in selected patients if perfusion equipment with improved biocompatibility is used. Bypass-induced morbidity can be reduced.     

Coronary artery bypass surgery with heparin-coated perfusion circuits and low-dose heparinization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of heparin-coated perfusion circuits with low-dose heparinization and centrifugal pumping compared with the standard method during coronary artery bypass grafting. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. SETTING: A primary care institution. PATIENTS: Ninety patients who underwent first-time elective coronary artery bypass grafting were eligible for the study. After giving informed consent, they were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups (30/group). INTERVENTIONS: Perfusion on regular uncoated bypass equipment with a roller pump and full-dose heparinization (300 IU/kg bolus, activated clotting time [ACT] > 400 s) (group 1), on a heparin-coated oxygenator with a centrifugal pump and full-dose heparinization (group 2) and on fully heparin-coated bypass equipment with a centrifugal pump and low-dose heparinization (100 IU/kg bolus, ACT of 180-400 s) (group 3). Standard coronary artery bypass grafting was performed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative bleeding, transfusion requirements and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: There were no complications related to the study protocol. Study groups were similar in terms of postoperative bleeding, transfusion requirements and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass with low-dose heparinization and centrifugal pumping is a safe practice but showed no advantages over the use of regular uncoated bypass circuits for coronary bypass surgery.     

In vitro effect of fresh frozen plasma on the activated coagulation time in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

The in vitro effect of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) on the whole blood activated coagulation time (ACT) was examined in 18 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The addition of FFP to whole blood in vitro, after systemic heparinization, significantly prolonged the ACT from 451 +/- 21 seconds (mean +/- SE) to 572 +/- 41 seconds (P less than 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the plasma antithrombin III activity and the prolongation in ACT after systemic heparinization, with or without addition of FFP. The addition of FFP to whole blood in three of the six patients who exhibited heparin resistance (ACT less than 400 seconds after administration of 350 unit/kg heparin) did not prolong the ACT to greater than 400 seconds. These observations suggest that infusion of FFP will further prolong the ACT after heparin administration in most patients including some with initial heparin resistance.     

Heparin-Coated Extracorporeal Circulation with Full and Low Dose Heparinization: Comparison of Thrombin Related Coagulatory Effects

Thrombin related coagulatory effects of a heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass system combined with full and low dose systemic heparinization were investigated in a prospective, randomized study in coronary bypass surgery patients. One hundred nineteen patients were divided into 3 groups. Group A (n = 39) had a standard uncoated extracorporeal circulation (ECC) set, and systemic heparin was administered in an initial dose of 400 IU/kg body weight. During ECC activated clotting time (ACT) was maintained at > or =480 s. Group B (n = 42) had the same ECC set completely coated with low molecular weight heparin. Intravenous heparin was given in the same dose as in Group A, and ACT was kept at the same level. Group C (n = 38) had the same coated ECC set as Group B, but intravenous heparin was reduced to 150 IU/kg, and during ECC, ACT was set to be > or =240 s. The same ECC components were used in all 3 groups including roller pumps, coronary suction, and an open cardiotomy reservoir. Thrombin generation as indicated by F1/F2 was significantly elevated at an ECC duration >60 min if heparin-coated ECC combined with low dose systemic heparinization was employed. Complexed thrombin (TAT) was significantly elevated after administration of protamine. Release of D-dimers indicating fibrinolysis was not significantly different between groups. Signs of clinical thromboembolism, i.e., postoperative neurological deficit, occurred in 2 patients in Group A and 1 patient in Group C. We conclude that heparin-coated extracorporeal circulation combined with reduced systemic heparinization intraoperatively leads to significantly increased thrombin generation, but not to increased fibrinolysis.     

Reducing hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass: a combined approach

Interventions such as heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and reduced shed blood reinfusion have shown mixed results when applied individually for limiting hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared coagulation and fibrinolytic activation during conventional CPB (control) (CTRL) using noncoated circuits, no antifibrinolytics, and open cardiotomy with a combined strategy (HAC) that used heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and closed cardiotomy. Blood samples were drawn before, during, and after CPB for primary coronary bypass grafting surgery from 9 CTRL patients and 10 HAC patients. Thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrinopeptide A levels (markers of thrombin and fibrin generation) were reduced in the HAC versus CTRL group after 30 min of CPB (P < 0.05). Average tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) levels were significantly lower in the HAC group by 30 min on CPB (P < 0.05), resulting in preservation of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 during CPB (P < 0.05). D-Dimer, a measure of intravascular fibrin formation and removal, was reduced in the HAC group during and after CPB (P < 0.005). Overall, the combined strategy was associated with a reduction in CPB-induced increases in markers of thrombin generation, fibrin formation, tPA release, and fibrin degradation and better preservation of PAI-1. IMPLICATIONS: A combined approach during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) that uses heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and limited reinfusion of shed pericardial blood is associated with reduced activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems that typically occurs during conventional CPB.     

Safety of heparin-coated circuits in primates during deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biologic impact of heparin-coated circuits without systemic heparinization during deep hypothermia. Baboons (n=6) were placed on a heparin-coated pediatric closed-circuit cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system and cooled to 18 degrees C. A control group (n=7) underwent similar protocol with a non heparin-coated circuit and received systemic heparin. Either low flow at 0.5 L/min/m 2 (n=8; 4 in each group) or circulatory arrest (n=5; 2 in experimental group and 3 in control group) was used during deep hypothermia. Samples for complete blood count (CBC), hepatic and renal function tests, activated clotting time (ACT) and thrombelastogram (TEG) were obtained before, during, and after bypass. Cerebral blood flow was measured using Xenon-133 and autopsies were performed to assess end-organ damage. The ACT returned to baseline in both groups, and renal and hepatic function were within normal limits. There was no significant difference between the TEG values between the groups post bypass. Fibrin split products were absent and fibrinogen levels were normal in both groups following bypass. Cerebral blood flows were equivalent in both groups before and after bypass, although in the heparin-coated group cerebral blood flows were significantly higher during CPB. There were no brain histologic changes in the heparin-coated group and one focal cortical infarct in the control group. This study suggests that hypothermia induced a state of anticoagulation that did not result in thrombus formation or end organ dysfunction during CPB with a heparin-coated circuit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The impact of heparin-coated circuits on hemodynamics during and after cardiopulmonary bypass

This study was performed to investigate if heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits can reduce the systemic inflammatory reaction with the subsequent release of vasoactive substances during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Fifty-one patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting were perfused with either a heparin-coated or an uncoated circuit. During bypass the mean arterial pressure was maintained as near as possible to 60 mm Hg. Mediators for inflammation, hemodynamic, and oxygen parameters were determined during and after bypass. To reach the target mean arterial pressure in the first hour of bypass the pump flow in the uncoated group had to be increased (P<0.05), consequently the systemic vascular resistance index decreased (P<0.05). After bypass more inotropic support was necessary in this group to reach this pressure. In the coated group less bradykinin, complement activation, and elastase was generated during bypass (P<0.05). The results of this study suggest that heparin coating not only improves biocompatibility, but also ameliorates the hemodynamic instability during and after bypass.     

Reduction of heparin dose is not beneficial to platelet function

BACKGROUND: To clarify the effects of the reduction of heparin dose on platelets, we conducted a prospective trial on patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Twenty-three patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were studied. The systemic heparin dose was 300 IU/kg in the control group (n = 11) and 200 IU/kg in the low-dose group (n = 12). Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass equipment was used for both the groups. Platelet counts, beta-thromboglobulin (beta-TG) and platelet factor 4 (PF4) concentrations were measured and the arterial filters in the circuits were observed by electron microscopy. RESULTS: Platelet counts were higher in the low-dose group than in the control group (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in the platelet release reaction (beta-TG and PF4). Electron microscopy demonstrated that cell adhesion on the arterial filters in the control group was significantly more marked than in the low-dose group (p < 0.01) and that most of the cells on the filters were neutrophils. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the reduction of heparin dose with the use of heparin-coated equipment reduces platelet loss, but does not suppress the platelet release reaction. Furthermore, the reduction of heparin dose reduces adherence of leukocytes to the filter surface.     

Relationship between granulocyte elastase and C3a under protamine dosing in on-pump cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The complement cascade and granulocytes are activated in on-pump cardiac surgery. If activation of complement directly regulates granulocytes, granulocyte elastase (GEL) should increase significantly after protamine administration. We examined the effect of protamine on granulocytes by protamine administration and observation of the effect on GEL and C3a. METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to two groups. In 15 patients, protamine was administered 5 min after the termination of cardiopulmonary bypass, and was administered 35 min after cardiopulmonary bypass in the other 15 patients. All patients were perfused with heparin-coated circuits and received 300 IU/kg heparin and 3 mg/kg protamine. GEL and C3a concentrations were measured at 7 time points. RESULTS: GEL concentrations increased significantly just before aortic declamping and did not increase significantly after protamine administration. C3a concentrations, however, did not increase during cardiopulmonary bypass and did increase significantly after protamine administration. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that GEL does not increase after protamine administration and that complement concentration does not directly affect GEL release.     

Hypothermia with heparin-coated circuits and low dose systemic heparinization in neurosurgery

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of profound hypothermic circulatory arrest with heparin-coated circuits and low dose systemic heparinization in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Surgery for giant intracranial aneurysms not operable using standard neurosurgical techniques was performed in 8 patients. All patients were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass using the closed-chest technique, except for the first patient who underwent open-chest bypass. Heparin was administered systemically (3,000 IU) and into the circuit (1,500 IU). Total circulatory arrest was begun at 20 degrees C. The D-dimer, alpha2 plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex, thrombin-antithrombin III, and beta-thromboglobulin concentrations were measured to evaluate the changes in the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems during bypass. There were no neurologic or cardiac complications. None of the indicators of platelet activation, coagulation, or fibrinolysis were elevated. Hypothermic circulatory arrest combined with heparin-coated circuits and low dose systemic heparinization is safe for use in neurosurgery.     

Low activated coagulation time during cardiopulmonary bypass does not increase postoperative bleeding

The activated coagulation time (ACT) is widely used to monitor adequacy of anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass despite absence of data establishing an ACT below which adverse outcomes occur. For anticoagulation before cardiopulmonary bypass, we administered a single dose of heparin (300 U/kg) to 193 patients and measured ACT and heparin levels at intervals after administration. No additional heparin was administered to any patient. Clot formation in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and excessive postoperative chest tube drainage were considered outcomes indicating inadequate anticoagulation. Cardiopulmonary bypass averaged 59 +/- 23 minutes (range, 30 to 138 minutes). Activated coagulation time values at every sampling period were normally distributed. In 51 patients (26.4%) ACT values were less than 400 seconds, including 4 less than 300 seconds, at some sampling time after heparinization. Patients with low ACT values did not bleed more postoperatively than those with high ACT values, nor was bleeding related to heparin level. No clots were found in any perfusion circuit. We conclude that a minimum ACT value for adequacy of heparinization is not yet defined but that it is less than 400 seconds.     

Circulating Cytokines and Granulocyte-Derived Enzymes During Complex Heart Surgery: A Clinical Study with Special Reference to Heparin-Coating of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits

Blood contact with artificial surfaces during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) triggers a systemic inflammatory response in which complement, granulocytes and cytokines play a major role. Heparin-coated CPB circuits were recently shown to reduce complement and granulocyte activation in such circumstances. The present study comprised 20 complex heart operations, 10 with heparin-coated circuits (group HC) and 10 controls (group C), with evaluation of changes in terminal complement complex, the granulocyte enzymes myeloperoxidase and lactoferrin, and the cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8). Standard heparin dose and uncoated cardiotomy reservoir were used in all cases. In both groups the levels of enzymes and terminal complement complex rose significantly, beginning at conclusion of CPB, above base values, without significant intergroup differences. IL-6 and IL-8 also increased significantly, but tended to be lower in the HC group, starting at CPB end and continuing until 20 hours postoperatively: for IL-6 the difference was significant at CPB end (83 ± 18 vs 197 ± 39 μg/1, p = 0.21). Significantly increased inflammatory response was thus found during complex heart operations even with use of heparin-coated CPB sets. The heparin-coating of circuits seems to diminish cytokine production.