Surgical volume and quality of care for esophageal resection: do high-volume hospitals have fewer complications?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that high-volume hospitals (HVHs) have lower mortality rates than low-volume hospitals (LVHs). However, little is known regarding the relationship of morbidity to hospital volume. The objective of the current study was to investigate the relative incidence of postoperative complications after esophageal resection at HVHs and LVHs. METHODS: All patients discharged from a nonfederal, acute-care hospital in Maryland after esophageal resection from 1994 to 1998 were included (n = 366). Rates of 10 postoperative complications were compared at HVHs and LVHs. Risk-adjusted analyses were performed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: High-volume hospitals had a mortality rate of 2.5% compared with 15.4% at LVHs (p < 0.001), with a case-mixed adjusted odds ratio (OR) of death equal to 5.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 16; p < 0.001). Low-volume hospitals had a profound increase in the risk of several complications after adjusting for case-mix: renal failure (OR, 19; 95% CI, 1.9 to 178; p = 0.01), pulmonary failure (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.6 to 14; p = 0.002), septicemia (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 15; p = 0.04), reintubation (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 6.1; p = 0.004), surgical complications (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.9; p = 0.001), and aspiration (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.3; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing esophageal resection at LVHs were at a markedly increased risk of postoperative complications and death. Pulmonary complications are particularly prevalent at LVHs and contribute to the death of patients having surgery at those centers.     

Impact of hospital volume on long-term survival after esophageal cancer surgery

HYPOTHESIS: The improved survival after esophageal cancer surgery in Sweden during recent years may be attributable to the increased centralization of such surgery. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: All Swedish residents undergoing esophageal cancer surgery from January 1, 1987, through December 31, 2000, were identified from the inpatient and cancer registers and were followed up until October 18, 2004, through nationwide registers. Hospital, tumor, and patient characteristics and preoperative oncological treatment were assessed through the registers and histopathological records. PATIENTS: Among 4904 patients with esophageal cancer, 1199 patients (24.4%) who underwent resection constituted the study cohort. Main Outcome Measure Survival rates and hazard ratios (HRs) relative to hospital volume. Low-volume hospitals (LVHs) conducted fewer than 10 esophagectomies annually, while high-volume hospitals (HVHs) conducted 10 or more. Hazard ratios were adjusted for several potential confounders. RESULTS: Thirty-day survival was 96% at HVHs and 91% at LVHs (P = .09). Survival rates 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery at HVHs were nonsignificantly higher (58%, 35%, and 27%, respectively) compared with those at LVHs (55%, 30%, and 24%, respectively). The adjusted HR was nonsignificantly 10% decreased at HVHs (HR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.04). In an analysis restricted to 764 patients (64%) without preoperative oncological treatment (in which the tumor stage was also adjusted for), survival was similar at HVHs and at LVHs (HR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed no effect of hospital volume on long-term survival after esophageal cancer surgery. Tumor biology apparently has a greater effect on the chances of long-term survival than hospital volume.     

Variation in death rate after abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in the United States: impact of hospital volume, gender, and age

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether high-volume hospitals (HVHs) have lower in-hospital death rates after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair compared with low-volume hospitals (LVHs). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Select statewide studies have shown that HVHs have superior outcomes compared with LVHs for AAA repair, but they may not be representative of the true volume-outcome relationship for the entire United States. METHODS: Patients undergoing repair of intact or ruptured AAAs in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for 1996 and 1997 were included (n = 13,887) for study. The NIS represents a 20% stratified random sample representative of all U.S. hospitals. Unadjusted and case mix-adjusted analyses were performed. RESULTS: The overall death rate was 3.8% for intact AAA repair and 47% for ruptured AAA repair. For repair of intact AAAs, HVHs had a lower death rate than LVHs. The death rate after repair of ruptured AAA was also slightly lower at HVHs. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for case mix, having surgery at an LVH was associated with a 56% increased risk of in-hospital death. Other independent risk factors for in-hospital death included female gender, age older than 65 years, aneurysm rupture, urgent or emergent admission, and comorbid disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study from a representative national database documents that HVHs have a significantly lower death rate than LVHs for repair of both intact and ruptured AAA. These data support the regionalization of patients to HVHs for AAA repair.     

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer: the influence of hospital volume on complications and length of stay

Background

Little information is available about the relationship between hospital volume and the clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of hospital volume on clinical outcomes of ESD using a national administrative database.

Methods

A total of 27,385 patients treated with ESD for gastric cancer were referred to 867 hospitals between 2009 and 2011 in Japan. We collected patients’ data from the administrative database to compare ESD-related complications and length of stay (LOS) in relation to hospital volume. Hospital volume was categorized into three groups based on the number of cases treated over the study period: low-volume hospitals (LVHs, <50 cases), medium-volume hospitals (MVHs, 50–100 cases), and high-volume hospitals (HVHs, >100 cases). These analyses were performed for each location of gastric cancer [upper (cardia and fundus), middle (body), and lower third (antrum and pylorus)].

Results

Significant differences in ESD-related complications among the three hospital volume categories were observed for upper gastric cancer (6.5 % in LVHs vs. 5.2 % in MVHs vs. 3.4 % in HVHs; p = 0.017). Multiple logistic regression revealed that HVHs were significantly associated with decreased relative risk of ESD-related complications in upper gastric cancer (odds ratio for HVHs 0.51; 95 % confidence interval, 0.31–0.83, p = 0.007). However, no significant differences for ESD-related complications were seen for middle and lower gastric cancers among the different hospital volume categories (p > 0.05). Additionally, hospital volume was significantly associated with a decreasing LOS for all locations of gastric cancers (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The present study has demonstrated that hospital volume was mainly associated with clinical outcome in patients with ESD for upper gastric cancer. Further studies for successive monitoring of outcomes of ESD should be conducted in the near future.     

Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery

CONTEXT: Although hospital procedure volume is clearly related to operative mortality with many cancer procedures, its effect on late survival is not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To examine relationships between hospital volume and late survival after different types of cancer resections. DESIGN: Using the national Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database (1992-2002), we identified all patients undergoing major resections for lung, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, colon, and bladder cancer (n = 64,047). Relationships between hospital volume and survival were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for patient characteristics and use of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Study Participants: U.S. Medicare patients residing in SEER regions. Main Outcome Measures: 5-year survival. RESULTS: Although there were statistically significant relationships between hospital volume and 5-year survival with all 6 cancer types, the relative importance of volume varied markedly. Absolute differences in 5-year survival probabilities rates between low-volume hospitals (LVHs) and high-volume hospitals (HVHs) ranged from 17% for esophageal cancer resection (17% vs. 34%, respectively) to only 3% for colon cancer resection (45% vs. 48%). Absolute differences in 5-year survival between LVHs and HVHs fell between these ranges for lung (6%), gastric (6%), pancreatic (5%), and bladder cancer (4%). Volume-related differences in late survival could not be attributed to differences in rates of adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Along with lower operative mortality, HVHs have better late survival rates with selected cancer resections than their lower-volume counterparts. Mechanisms underlying their better outcomes and thus opportunities for improvement remain to be identified.     

Referral patterns and severity distribution of burn care: implications for burn centers and surgical training

The purpose of this investigation was to examine burn-patient referral patterns and severity of burn distribution, as well as to determine the impact these patterns may have on the education of surgeons in training. Data from the 1998-1999 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the Michigan Hospital Association (MHA) were analyzed based upon burn diagnostic-related groups (DRGs; 504-511) and their referral distribution was documented. Providers were segregated into high-volume hospitals (HVHs) treating >100 patients per year, moderate-volume hospitals treating 25 to 99 patients per year, and low-volume hospitals (LVHs) treating <25 patients per year. Surgical training programs were identified within the state of Michigan and examined for an educational affiliation with a burn center. Across the United States, 47.5% of burn patients receive care at HVHs. Patients with the highest severity (ie, DRGs 504 and 505) were usually (77%) treated in HVHs. Within the state of Michigan, 4 HVHs were identified, which represent 50.8% of the total burn admissions. At least 1 HVH received over 80% of its admissions from adjacent or distant counties and subsequently represented a higher proportion of higher-severity burn DRG admissions. Twenty-three percent of general surgical programs within the state of Michigan do not have a formal burn rotation or affiliation with a regional burn center for educational training. Several programs have affiliations with low-volume burn providers. The most severe burns are reaching high-volume centers, but many burns continue to remain within LVHs. A wide variation in patient distribution occurs throughout the United States. Matching the patient and resident distribution is essential for effective training of surgical residents.     

Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE: Treatment for nephrolithiasis has evolved because of the dissemination of less invasive techniques, such as ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy. We examined temporal trends in PCNL use and characterized the determinants of a prolonged LOS and in-hospital mortality to provide insight into the evolution of practice patterns for nephrolithiasis treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We abstracted data on 12,948 patients undergoing percutaneous procedures for urinary calculi between 1988 and 2002 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Disease, 9th revision, Clinical Modification procedure and diagnostic codes. A weighted sample was used to estimate national PCNL use rates. Adjusted models were constructed to measure the association of hospital structure and patient demographics with mortality and a prolonged LOS (greater than 90th percentile). RESULTS: Annual PCNL use increased temporally during the study from 1.2/100,000 to 2.5/100,000 United States residents (p <0.0001). The in-hospital mortality rate was low at 0.2%, although a volume-outcome relationship was still evident (high and low volume 0.1% and 0.2%, respectively, p = 0.002). Treatment at hospitals with lower hospital PCNL volume and lower discharge volume (all diagnoses) was associated with an increasing likelihood of in-hospital mortality (each p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the advent of less invasive techniques PCNL remains a popular means of managing stone disease. Although mortality was rare, it was significantly lower at high than at low volume hospitals. Low short-term mortality rates coupled with shorter LOS and high success rates may make PCNL increasingly palatable from a patient perspective and provide a potential basis for its increasing use.     

Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality from radical cystectomy: data from the health care utilization project

PURPOSE: We determined the influence of hospital and surgeon volume on various outcome parameters after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All inpatient discharges after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer (1988 to 1999) from the Health Care Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample were included in the analysis. Hospital and individual surgeon volume of discharges per year were separated into terciles. Outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and inflation adjusted charge per admission. Mortality was compared among hospital volume levels using the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test while the LOS and charges were compared using ANOVA. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for confounding factors. All the analyses were also performed in 3 different age strata (younger than 50 years, 50 to 69 years and 70 years or more). RESULTS: There were 13,964 patients who underwent radical cystectomy. Overall in-hospital mortality was 408 of 13,964 (2.9%), average LOS was 14 days (+/- SD 10.28) and average charges were 47,146 dollars (+/- SD 45,263 dollars). In-hospital mortality was significantly associated with higher volume particularly for patients older than 50 years. Surgeon volume did not influence in-hospital mortality except for patients in the 50 to 69-year-old age group. Results of multivariate regression analysis demonstrated hospital volume was a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality but this effect was lost when controlling for surgeon volume. LOS was significantly higher for low volume surgeons. High volume hospitals had lower average total charges compared with the low and moderate volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital and surgeon volume have a significant impact on in-hospital mortality and LOS after radical cystectomy. Radical cystectomy performed at a higher volume center may result in lower charges and shorter hospital stay while decreasing the likelihood of in-hospital mortality.     

Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND: To analyze hospital resource utilization for laparoscopic vs open incisional hernia repair including the postoperative period. METHODS: Prospectively collected administrative data for incisional hernia repairs were examined. A total of 884 incisional hernia repairs were examined for trends in type of approach over time. Starting October 2001, detailed records were available, and examined for operating room (OR) time, cost data, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day postoperative hospital encounters. RESULTS: Of the total, 469 incisional hernias were approached laparoscopically (53%) and 415 open (47%). Laparoscopic repair had shorter LOS (1 +/- 0.2 days vs 2 +/- 0.6 days), longer OR time (149 +/- 4 min vs 89 +/- 4 min), higher supply costs (2,237 dollars +/- 71 dollars vs 664 dollars +/- 113 dollars), slightly lower total hospital cost (6,396 dollars +/- 477 dollars vs 7,197 dollars +/- 1,819 dollars), and slightly more postoperative hospital encounters (15% vs 13%). Use of laparoscopy increased over time (37% in 2000 vs 68% in 2004). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is becoming increasingly popular, and not at increased cost to the health care system.     

Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Outcome analysis is increasingly being used to develop health-care policy and direct patient referral. For example, the Leapfrog Group health-care quality initiative has proposed "evidence-based hospital" referral criteria for specific procedures including elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA-R). These criteria include an annual hospital AAA operative volume exceeding 50 cases and provision of intensive care unit (ICU) care by board-certified intensivists. Outcomes after AAA-R are reportedly influenced by presentation (intact vs. ruptured), operative approach (endovascular vs. open, transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal), surgeon subspecialty, case volume (hospital and surgeon), and provision of postoperative care by an intensivist. The purpose of this study was to compare our single-center results with those of high-volume centers to assess the validity of the concept that surrogate markers, such as case volume or intensivist involvement, can be used to estimate procedural outcome. A retrospective review was performed of AAA-Rs at one low-volume academic medical center from January 1994 to March 2005. Demographic data, aneurysm diameter and location, operative indications, and repair approach were documented. Postoperative complications, mortality rates, and hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS) were noted and compared to established benchmarks. During the study period, 270 patients underwent AAA-R (annual mean = 27 hospital cases and 13.4 cases/attending vascular surgeon). ICU care was provided by a dedicated vascular surgery service without routine intensivist involvement. Open, elective, infrarenal AAA-R was performed in 161 patients (60%), with a 2.5% hospital mortality rate (30-day, 3.1%). Thirty-three (12%) patients underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), with no mortality. Both ICU (3.7 vs. 1.4 days, p = 0.03) and hospital (9.2 vs. 2.8 days, p = 0.002) LOS were significantly reduced after EVAR compared to open repair. Hospital LOS was significantly lower after open retroperitoneal repair compared to transperitoneal repair (6.1 vs. 10.3 days, p = 0.001). Thirty-five patients (13%) underwent ruptured AAA-R, with only 34.3% mortality (in-hospital and 30-day). Forty-one patients (15%) underwent repair of complex aortic aneurysms, with 14.1% mortality. There are increasing societal and economic pressures to direct patient referrals to "centers of excellence" for specific surgical procedures. Although our institution meets neither of the Leapfrog Group's proposed criteria, our mortality and LOS for both intact and ruptured infrarenal AAA-R are equivalent or superior to published benchmarks for high-volume hospitals. Individual institutional outcome results such as these suggest that patient referral and care should be based upon actual, carefully verified outcome data rather than utilization of surrogate markers such as case volume and subspecialist involvement in postoperative care.     

Volume Associations in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Taiwan Population-Based Study

This cohort study retrospectively analyzed 78,364 THAs performed from 1998 to 2009. The mean hospital charge for all THAs performed during the study period was $4,131.9 dollars. The average hospital charges for high-volume hospitals and surgeons were 6% and 7% lower, respectively, than those for low-volume hospitals and surgeons. Analysis by propensity score matching showed that hospital charges significantly differed between THA procedures performed by high- and low-volume hospitals ($3,285.8 dollars versus $4,816.2 dollars, respectively) and between THA procedures performed by high- and low-volume surgeons, ($3,438.5 dollars versus $4,404.7 dollars, respectively) (P < 0.001). The data indicate that analysis and emulation of the treatment strategies used by high-volume hospitals and by high-volume surgeons may reduce overall hospital charges.     

The effects of a prospective case payment system on hospital charges for total hip arthroplasty in Taiwan

We evaluate the effects of instituting prospective case payment system (PPS) system on total hip arthroplasty (THA) charges and compare our university hospital THA cost structure with comparable health care institutions in the United States. The study consisted of 5009 patients who received a primary THA in 24 hospitals between 1995 and 2001. After adjusting for inflation, the average total charge of THA for pre-PPS was 4762 US dollars and 4054 US dollars for post-PPS. The average cost for prostheses accounted for 61% of total costs at our hospital, as compared with the US studies ranging from 27% to 34%. As United States, PPS achieved the purpose of cost containment and changed practice patterns of orthopedic surgeons and hospital resource use in Taiwan.     

Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy

BACKGROUND: Several complex surgical procedures had a reduction in mortality when they were performed at high volume centers. We hypothesized esophagectomy procedures for cancer performed at high volume hospitals in the state of Massachusetts would show a similar relationship. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Massachusetts Health Data Consortium on discharge information for all acute care hospitals in Massachusetts regardless of payer from 1992 to 2000. The influence of hospital volume was related to days in the intensive care unit, length of stay, discharge disposition, hospital mortality, and total cost. Hospitals were stratified to low volume hospitals (< 6 cases per year) and high volume hospitals (> 6 cases per year). RESULTS: One thousand one hundred ninety-three patients underwent esophagectomy during this 8-year study period in Massachusetts. Three high volume hospitals performed 56.5% of all resections (674 of 1,193). Sixty-one low volume hospitals performed 43.5% of the resections (519 of 1,193) with an average volume of only 1 case of esophagectomy per year. High volume hospitals were associated with a 2-day decrease in median length of stay (p < 0.001), a 3-day reduction in median intensive care unit stay (p < 0.001), an increased rate of home discharges (as opposed to rehabilitation hospitals) (p < 0.001), and a 3.7-fold decrease in hospital mortality (9.2% vs 2.5%; p < 0.001). The odds ratio of death at a low volume hospital was 4.3 (95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 7.7; p < 0.001). The median cost was $755 dollars greater at high volume hospitals (p = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals that perform a high volume of esophagectomies have better results with early clinical outcomes and marked reductions in mortality compared with low volume hospitals.     

Do patient or hospital demographics predict cholecystectomy outcomes? A nationwide study of 93,578 patients

Background The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of patient and hospital demographics on cholecystectomy outcomes.Methods Year 2000 data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was obtained for all patients undergoing inpatient cholecystectomy at 994 nationwide hospitals. Differences (p < 0.05) were determined using standard statistical methods.Results Of 93,578 cholecystectomies performed, 73.4% were performed laparoscopically. Length of hospital stay (LOS), charges, morbidity, and mortality were significantly less for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Increasing patient age was associated with increased LOS, charges, morbidity, mortality, and a decreased LC rate. Charges, LOS, morbidity, and mortality were highest for males with a lower LC rate than for females Mortality and LOS were higher, whereas morbidity was lower for African Americans than for whites. Hispanics had the shortest LOS, as well as the lowest morbidity and mortality rates. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed more commonly for Hispanics than for whites or African Americans, with lower charges for whites. Medicare-insured patients incurred longer LOS as well as higher charges, morbidity, and mortality than Medicaid, private, and self-pay patients, and were the least likely to undergo LC. As median income decreases, LOS increases, and morbidity decreases with no mortality effect.Teaching hospitals had a longer LOS, higher charges, and mortality, and a lower LC rate, with no difference in morbidity, than nonteaching centers. As hospital size (number of beds) increased, LOS, and charges increased, with no difference in morbidity. Large hospitals had the highest mortality rates and the lowest incidence of LC. Urban hospitals had higher LOS and charges with a lower LC rate than rural hospitals. After control was used for all other covariates, increased age was a predictor of increased morbidity. Female gender, LC, and intraoperative cholangiogram all predicted decreased morbidity. Increased age, complications, and emergency surgery predicted increased mortality, with laparoscopy and intraoperative cholangiogram having protective effects. Patient income, insurance status, and race did not play a role in morbidity or mortality. Academic or teaching status of the hospital also did not influence patient outcomes.Conclusions Patient and hospital demographics do affect the outcomes of patients undergoing inpatient cholecystectomy. Although male gender, African American race, Medicare-insured status, and large, urban hospitals are associated with less favorable cholecystectomy outcomes, only increased age predicts increased morbidity, whereas female gender, laparoscopy, and cholangiogram are protective. Increased age, complications, and emergency surgery predict mortality, with laparoscopy and intraoperative cholangiogram having protective effects.Presented at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Annual Scientific Session in Denver, Colorado, March 31–April 3, 2004     

The Relationship between Volume and Outcome after Bariatric Surgery: A Nationwide Study in Taiwan

Background

This study purposed to explore the impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on hospital resource utilization after bariatric surgery and to identify the predictors of length of stay (LOS) and hospital treatment cost in a nationwide population in Taiwan.

Methods

This population-based cohort study retrospectively analyzed 2,674 bariatric surgery procedures performed from 1997 to 2008. Hospitals were classified as low- and high-volume hospitals if their annual number of bariatric surgeries were <35 and ??35, respectively. Surgeons were classified as low- and high-volume surgeons if their annual number of bariatric surgeries were <15 and ??15, respectively. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to predict LOS and hospital treatment cost.

Results

The mean LOS was 7.67?days and the LOS for high-volume hospitals/surgeons was, on average, 28%/31% shorter than that for low-volume hospitals/surgeons. The mean hospital treatment cost was US$2,344.08, and the average hospital costs for high-volume hospitals/surgeons were 10%/13% lower than those for low-volume hospitals/surgeons. Advanced age, male gender, high Charlson co-morbidity index, and current treatment in a low-volume hospital, by a low-volume surgeon, and via open gastric bypass were significantly associated with long LOS and high hospital treatment cost (P?Conclusions The data suggest that annual surgical volume is the key factor in hospital resource utilization. The results improve the understanding of medical resource allocation for this surgical procedure and can help to formulate public health policies for optimizing hospital resource utilization for related diseases.     

National study of the effect of patient and hospital characteristics on bariatric surgery outcomes

The influence of patient and hospital demographics on gastric bypass (GB) outcomes is unknown. We analyzed year 2000 data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database for all GB patients. In 2000, 5876 GB were performed in the 137 sample hospitals (M:F, 14%:86%). Length of stay (LOS, days), charges, comorbidities, and morbidity were higher for those aged >60 years compared to < 40 years. LOS, charges, comorbidities, morbidity, and mortality were highest in males. LOS was longest in African Americans compared to Caucasians and Hispanics. Charges and comorbidities were greatest in African Americans and Hispanics compared to Caucasians. Medicare and Medicaid-insured patients have higher LOS, charges, comorbidities, morbidity, and mortality compared to privately insured and self-pay patients. Lower income patients have higher LOS and total charges. Nonteaching hospitals have an increased LOS and charges and treat patients with more comorbidities compared to teaching hospitals. LOS, charges, and morbidity are directly proportional to hospital size. Urban hospitals have lower LOS and higher charges compared to rural hospitals. As hospital GB volume increases, LOS, charges, and morbidity decrease with no mortality effect. After controlling for all other covariates, male gender, increased age, and large hospital size were predictors of increased morbidity. Having had a complication predicted increased mortality, while female gender had a protective effect. Patient income, insurance status, and race did not play a role in morbidity or mortality. Neither academic, teaching status of the hospital or hospital gastric bypass volume influenced patient outcomes. Patient and hospital demographics do affect the outcomes of patients undergoing GB. Increasing age, male gender, and surgery performed in large hospitals are predictors of morbidity. Male gender and postoperative complications predict increased mortality. Neither comorbidities, race, payer, income, hospital academic status, location, nor hospital volume affect the outcome after GB.     

The most frequent traumatic orthopaedic injuries from a national pediatric inpatient population

Pediatric trauma remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality of children in the United States and entails exorbitant costs. A 1997 national pediatric inpatient database, the Kids' Inpatient Database, was reviewed for current trauma and practice patterns and was found to contain over 84,000 patients admitted for orthopaedic trauma. These patients accrued an estimated 932.8 million dollars in hospital charges. Femur fracture was the most frequent injury among this patient group (21.7% of orthopaedic trauma), followed by tibia and/or fibula fracture (21.5%), humerus fracture (17.0%), radius and/or ulna fracture (14.8%), and vertebral fracture (5.2%). While the majority of pediatric orthopaedic trauma was treated at non-children's hospitals (70.4%), patients with certain diagnoses such as femur, humerus, vertebral, pelvic, or hand/finger fracture or a back sprain/strain were directed to children's hospitals more frequently compared with the total number of pediatric orthopaedic trauma patients. Practice patterns varied for certain subgroups (eg, femoral shaft fractures) of patients, depending on the type of hospital where the child was treated. Children who sustained a femoral shaft fracture in the 6-to-10-year age group were significantly more likely to receive internal fixation versus casting or traction if they were treated at a children's hospital. Understanding the patterns in which traumatic injuries occur in children is paramount to establishing effective injury prevention, as well as adapting treatment to optimize outcomes.     

The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: The value of radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer depends on low morbidity and mortality. We assessed whether patient outcome is associated with how many of these procedures are performed at hospitals yearly. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, which is a stratified probability sample of American hospitals, we identified 66,693 men who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1989 and 1995. Cases were categorized into volume groups according to hospital annual rate of radical prostatectomies performed, including low-fewer than 25, medium-25 to 54 and high-greater than 54. We performed multivariate logistic regression to control for patient characteristics when assessing the associations of hospital volume, in-hospital mortality and resource use. RESULTS: Overall adjusted in-hospital mortality after radical prostatectomy was relatively low (0.25%). However, patients at low volume centers were 78% more likely to have in-hospital mortality than those at high volume centers (adjusted odds ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.6). Overall length of stay decreased at all hospitals between 1989 and 1995. However, average length of stay was longer and total hospital charges were higher at low than at high volume centers (7.3 versus 6.1 days, p<0.0001, and $15,600 versus $13,500, p<0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital volumes inversely related to in-hospital mortality, length of stay and total hospital charges after radical prostatectomy. Further study is necessary to examine the association of hospital volume with other important outcomes, including incontinence, impotence and long-term patient survival after radical prostatectomy.     

Emergency and elective coronary artery bypass grafting: comparisons of risk profiles, postoperative outcomes, and resource requirements

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between preoperative risk factors and postoperative outcomes in emergency and elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients and to quantify resource requirements. DESIGN: Retrospective database review. SETTING: New York State SPARCS database. PARTICIPANTS: Data from 4,001 emergency and 7,489 elective CABG patients were evaluated retrospectively. INTERVENTIONS: Data were compared between groups using chi-squares, t tests, and logistic regression analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preoperatively, 47.1% of patients in the emergency group had unstable angina and 34.1% had acute myocardial infarction compared with 33.9% and 15.2% in the elective group, respectively (p < 0.0001). There were no marked differences in the preoperative noncardiac risk factors between groups. The mortality rate was 4.7% in the emergency group and 2.6% in the elective group (p < 0.0001). The emergency group had more postoperative cardiac complications (18.3% v 8.3%, p < 0.0001). The length of hospital stay in the emergency group was 17.5 +/- 15.8 days (median 14 days) compared with 12.9 +/- 15.1 days (median 9 days) in the elective group (p < 0.00001). Total hospital charges in the emergency and elective groups were 46,700 US dollars +/- 42,400 US dollars (median 35,600 US dollars ) and 34,800 US dollars +/- 36,400 US dollars (median 26,500 US dollars) (p < 0.00001), respectively. The median total cost was 26,300 US dollars for emergency and 19,600 US dollars for elective group (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing emergency CABG had greater postoperative morbidity and mortality, longer LOS, and higher total costs than patients undergoing elective surgery. This difference is predictable on the basis of preoperative cardiac risk factors. Emergency operations have a major impact on the rates of morbidity, mortality, and use of resources.     

Effect of repair strategy on hospital cost for infants with tetralogy of Fallot.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the total hospital cost (HC) for one-stage versus "two-stage" repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) in infants younger than 1 year of age. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Total (one-stage) correction of TOF is now being performed with excellent results in infancy. Alternatively, a two-stage approach, with palliation of infants in the first year of life, followed by complete repair at a later time can be used. In some institutions, the two-stage approach is standard practice for infants younger than 1 year of age or is used selectively in patients with an anomalous coronary artery across the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), "small pulmonary arteries," multiple congenital anomalies, critical illnesses (CI), which increase the risk of bypass (e.g., sepsis or DIC), or severe hypercyanotic spells (HS) at the time of presentation. The cost implications of these two approaches are unknown. METHODS: The authors reviewed 22 patients younger than 1 year of age who underwent repair of TOF at their institution between 1993 and 1995. Eighteen patients had one-stage (1 degree) repair (mean age, 3.4 +/- 3.1 months; range, 3 days-9 months) and 4 patients were treated by a staged approach with initial palliation (1.6 +/- 0.4 month; range, 1.5-2 months) followed by later repair (14.75 +/- 1.5 months; range, 13-16 months). The reasons for palliation were severe HS at time of presentation (two patients), anomalous coronary artery (one patient) and CI (one patient). In the 18 patients undergoing 1 degree repair, 3 (16.6%) presented with HS, 6 (33.3%) had a transanular repair, and 6 (33.3%) were able to be repaired through an entirely transatrial approach (youngest patient, 1.5 months). The HC (1996 dollars) and hospital length of stay (LOS; days) were evaluated for all patients. The HCs were calculated using transition I, which is a cost accounting system used by our medical center since July 1992. Transition I provides complete data on all direct and indirect hospital-based, nonprofessional costs. RESULTS: There was no mortality in either group. The group undergoing 1 degree repair had an average LOS of 14.5 +/- 11.2 days compared to an average LOS for palliation of 14 +/- 6.4 days. When the palliated group returned for complete repair, the average LOS was 28.8 +/- 25 days, yielding a total LOS for the two-stage strategy of 43 +/- 30.8 days (p = 0.003 compared to 1 degree repair). The HC for 1 degree repair was $32,541 +/- $15,968 compared to $25,737 +/- $1900 for palliation (p = not significant compared to 1 degree repair) and $54,058 +/- $39,395 for subsequent complete repair (p = not significant compared to 1 degree repair) (total two-stage repair HC = $79,795 +/- $40,625; p = 0.001 compared to 1 degree repair). The LOS and HC for the two-stage group combine a total of palliation plus later repair and, as such, reflect two separate hospitalizations and convalescent periods. To eliminate cost outliers, a best-case analysis was performed by eliminating 50% of patients from each group. Using this analysis, the two-stage approach resulted in an average (total) LOS of 16.5 +/- 2.1 days compared to 8.5 +/- 1.4 days for the 1 degree group. Total cost for the two-stage strategy in this best-case group was $44,660 +/- $3645 compared to $22,360 +/- $3331 for 1 degree repair (p = 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: The data from this review show that palliation alone generates HC similar to that from 1 degree infant repair of TOF, and total combined HC and LOS for palliation plus eventual repair of TOF (two-stage approach) are significantly higher than from 1 degree repair. Furthermore, these data do not include additional costs for care delivered between palliation and repair (e.g., outpatient visits, cardiac catheterization, serial echocardiography). Although there may be occasions when a strategy using initial palliation followed by later repair may seem prudent, the cost is clearly higher and use of health care resources greater.