Distinction between hereditary and sporadic breast cancer on the basis of clinicopathological data

BACKGROUND: About 5% of all breast cancer cases are attributable to germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. BRCA mutations in suspected carriers, however, may be missed, which hampers genetic counselling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Different clinicopathological features were compared between 22 breast cancers from carriers of proved BRCA1 mutations and 604 cancers from sporadic controls. In addition, 5 BRCA2-related breast cancers and 66 breast cancers of untested patients at intermediate risk and 19 breast cancers of untested patients at high risk of hereditary disease on the basis of family history were evaluated. RESULTS: A "probably sporadic" class (age >or=54 years and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) negative; 68% of cases) with a 0% chance of BRCA1-related breast cancer containing 79% of the sporadic cases was yielded by using a decision tree with age, Ki67 and EGFR. A 75% chance of BRCA1-related breast cancer was shown by the "probably BRCA1-related" class (age <54 years and Ki67 >or=25%; 8% of cases) with 82% of the BRCA1-related cases but only 1.4% of the sporadic cases. Most cases at intermediate or high risk of hereditary disease on the basis of family history could be classified with high probability as either probably BRCA1 related or probably sporadic. CONCLUSION: Breast carcinomas can be classified with a high level of certainty as sporadic or related to BRCA1 germline mutations by using a decision tree with age, Ki67 and EGFR. This can be clinically useful in mutation analysis in families with a borderline risk of hereditary disease.     

Novel somatic mutations in the BRCA1 gene in sporadic breast tumors

Germline mutations in two major susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 contribute to the majority of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Besides the germline mutation, tumor progression depends on the loss of a wild-type allele. Allelic losses in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 loci have also been detected in a high proportion of sporadic breast tumors, suggesting the role of these genes in the development of non-inherited breast cancer. Forty unselected breast tumors were analyzed for the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at BRCA1 and BRCA2 regions and tumors with allelic deletions were screened for the presence of acquired genetic alterations in respective genes. 21.1% of 38 informative tumor samples carried LOH at the BRCA1 locus whereas 33.3% of 39 informative samples showed LOH at the BRCA2 locus. Pathogenic truncating mutations in the BRCA1 gene were found in two tumor samples with allelic losses, whereas no mutations were identified in the BRCA2 gene. Mutations were not detected in non-tumor samples from the same individuals, which indicated that the BRCA1 allele was inactivated by somatic mutations in tumor tissue. The c.1116G>A (1235G>A) nonsense mutation (p.W372X) belongs to the genetic abnormalities detected infrequently in hereditary tumors; the c.3862delG (3981delG) frameshift mutation (p.E1288fsX1306) is a novel gene alteration. The occurrence of inactivating somatic mutations in sporadic breast tumors suggested the role of the BRCA1 gene in tumorigenesis in at least a minor group of patients with non-familial breast cancer.     

Accumulation of p53 protein is frequent in ovarian cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations

BACKGROUND: Mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes are responsible for up to 95% of hereditary ovarian cancer cases. Both genes function as tumour suppressor genes, and development of a cancer is thought to require an accumulation of somatic genetic events in addition to the inherited germline predisposition. It is unknown whether these somatic events in BRCA associated ovarian cancer are similar to or distinct from those in sporadic cases. The most frequent somatic genetic event in ovarian cancer is a mutation of the p53 gene. AIM: To study the role of p53 in hereditary ovarian cancer, by analysing accumulation of the p53 protein in ovarian cancers which occurred in BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation carriers and comparing the results with a panel of ovarian cancers from patients who tested negative for both BRCA1 and BRCA2. METHODS: The study group consisted of 39 ovarian cancer patients in whom a BRCA mutation had been confirmed previously. p53 Immunohistochemistry was performed on archival tissue using a standard microwave antigen retrieval technique. The rate of p53 accumulation was compared with 40 ovarian cancer cases who tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. RESULTS: P53 Accumulation was similar in BRCA related ovarian cancers and BRCA negative controls. Overall 27 of 39 BRCA1 or BRCA2 positive cases (69%) had evidence of p53 accumulation, compared with 24 of 40 invasive ovarian cancer cases (60%) which tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. BRCA1 related ovarian cancers showed p53 accumulation in 22 of 30 cases (73%); p53 accumulation was present in five of nine BRCA2 related ovarian cancers. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, somatic p53 alterations leading to p53 accumulation are an important event in hereditary ovarian cancer and are as frequent as in non-BRCA-related ovarian cancer.     

Oncogenic pathways in hereditary and sporadic breast cancer

Cancer is a genetic disease. Breast cancer tumorigenesis can be described as a multi-step process in which each step is thought to correlate with one or more distinct mutations in major regulatory genes. The question addressed is how far a multi-step progression model for sporadic breast cancer would differ from that for hereditary breast cancer. Hereditary breast cancer is characterized by an inherited susceptibility to breast cancer on basis of an identified germline mutation in one allele of a high penetrance susceptibility gene (such as BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK 2, TP53 or PTEN). Inactivation of the second allele of these tumour suppressor genes would be an early event in this oncogenic pathway (Knudson's "two-hit" model). Sporadic breast cancers result from a serial stepwise accumulation of acquired and uncorrected mutations in somatic genes, without any germline mutation playing a role. Mutational activation of oncogenes, often coupled with non-mutational inactivation of tumour suppressor genes, is probably an early event in sporadic tumours, followed by more, independent mutations in at least four or five other genes, the chronological order of which is likely less important. Oncogenes that have been reported to play an early role in sporadic breast cancer are MYC, CCND1 (Cyclin D1) and ERBB2 (HER2/neu). In sporadic breast cancer, mutational inactivation of BRCA1/2 is rare, as inactivation requires both gene copies to be mutated or totally deleted. However, non-mutational functional suppression could result from various mechanisms, such as hypermethylation of the BRCA1 promoter or binding of BRCA2 by EMSY. In sporadic breast tumorigenesis, at least three different pathway-specific mechanisms of tumour progression are recognizable, with breast carcinogenesis being different in ductal versus lobular carcinoma, and in well differentiated versus poorly differentiated ductal cancers. Thus, different breast cancer pathways emerge early in the process of carcinogenesis, ultimately leading to clinically different tumour types. As mutations acquired early during tumorigenesis will be present in all later stages, large-scale gene expression profiling using DNA microarray analysis techniques can help to classify breast cancers into clinically relevant subtypes.     

BRCA1-methylated sporadic breast cancers are BRCA-like in showing a basal phenotype and absence of ER expression

BRCA1 mutations have been associated with hereditary breast cancer only. Recent studies indicate that a subgroup of sporadic breast cancer might also be associated with reduction in BRCA1 mRNA levels and protein expression. However, the mechanism of reduced mRNA and protein expression is yet not fully elucidated. This study aims to assess BRCA1 protein expression and the role of BRCA1 promoter methylation in sporadic breast cancer in North Indian population and to correlate these with known prognostic factors and molecular profiles of breast cancer. BRCA1 protein expression was normal (>50?% tumour cells) in 41 (43?%) cases, reduced (20-50?% tumour cells) in 33 (35?%) cases and absent/markedly reduced (<20?% tumour cells) in 21 (22.1?%) cases. Cases which were negative for BRCA1 protein were more frequently positive for basal markers (29 versus 5?%) and were more often ER-negative (62 versus 39?%) than BRCA1-positive tumours. Methylation of BRCA1 promoter region was seen in 11/45 cases (24?%). All 11 cases showing BRCA1 methylation had absent (eight cases) or reduced (three cases) BRCA1 protein expression. BRCA1 protein-negative tumours were more frequently basal marker-positive and ER-negative, highlighting the 'BRCAness' of sporadic breast cancer with loss of BRCA1 protein expression through promoter hypermethylation similar to hereditary breast cancer with BRCA1 mutations. Loss of BRCA1 in sporadic breast cancer suggests that therapeutics targeting BRCA1 pathway in hereditary breast cancer like PARP inhibitors might be used as therapeutic targets for sporadic breast tumours.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Korean patients with sporadic breast cancer

In order to evaluate the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Korean patients with sporadic breast cancer, 97 patients with sporadic breast cancer were analyzed for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 coding regions, by using a combination of fluorescent-conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis (F-CSGE) and direct sequencing. Fifty-five distinct sequence variants were detected, which included three pathogenic truncating mutations, 15 missense mutations, 16 polymorphisms, and 21 intronic variants. Twenty-six of these variants have never been previously reported and may be of Korean-specific origin. Two pathogenic BRCA1 mutations (c.922_924delinsT, c.5445G>A) and one pathogenic BRCA2 mutation (c.2259delT) were observed, and two of these (BRCA1 c.5445G>A and BRCA2 c.2259delT) are novel. The total prevalence of germline pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 in Korean sporadic breast cancer is estimated to be about 3.1%. Considering that the majority of breast cancer cases are sporadic, the present study will be helpful in the evaluation of the need for the genetic screening of germline BRCA mutations in sporadic breast cancer patients. Further study using a larger sample size is required to determine the merits of genetic diagnosis and counseling in breast cancer patients.     

Mutations in the BRCA1-associated RING domain (BARD1) gene in primary breast, ovarian and uterine cancers

Germline alterations of BRCA1 result in susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. The protein encoded by BRCA1 interacts in vivo with the BRCA1-associated RING domain (BARD1) protein. Accordingly, BARD1 is likely to be a critical factor in BRCA1-mediated tumor suppression and may also serve as a target for tumorigenic lesions in some human cancers. We have now determined the genomic structure of BARD1 and performed a mutational analysis of 58 ovarian tumors, 50 breast tumors and 60 uterine tumors. Seven polymorphisms were detected within the 2.34 kb coding sequence of BARD1 . Somatically acquired missense mutations were observed in one breast carcinoma and one endometrial tumor; in at least one of these cases, tumor formation was accompanied by loss of the wild-type BARD1 allele, following the paradigm for known tumor suppressor genes. In addition, a germline alteration of BARD1 was identified in a clear cell ovarian tumor (Gln564His); again, loss of the wild-type BARD1 allele was observed in the malignant cells of this patient. The Gln564His patient was also diagnosed with two other primary cancers: a synchronous lobular breast carcinoma and a stage IA clear cell endometrioid cancer confined to an endometrial polyp 6 years earlier. These findings suggest an occasional role for BARD1 mutations in the development of sporadic and hereditary tumors.      

Novel germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Indian breast and breast-ovarian cancer families

The two major hereditary breast/ovarian cancer predisposition tumor suppressor genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2 that perform apparently generic cellular functions nonetheless cause tissue-specific syndromes in the human population when they are altered, or mutated in the germline. However, little is known about the contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to breast and/or ovarian cancers in the Indian population. We have screened for mutations the entire BRCA1 and BRCA2 coding sequences, and intron-exon boundaries, as well as their flanking intronic regions in sixteen breast or breast and ovarian cancer families of Indian origin. We have also analyzed 20 female patients with sporadic breast cancer regardless of age and family history, and 69 unrelated normal individuals as control. Thus a total of 154 samples were screened for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations using a combination of polymerase chain reaction-mediated site directed mutagenesis (PSM), polymerase chain reaction-single stranded conformation polymorphism assay (PCR-SSCP) and direct DNA sequencing of PCR products (DS). Twenty-one sequence variants including fifteen point mutations were identified. Five deleterious pathogenic, protein truncating frameshift and non-sense mutations were detected in exon 2 (c.187_188delAG); and exon 11 (c.3672G>T) [p.Glu1185X] of BRCA1 and in exon 11 (c.5227dupT, c.5242dupT, c.6180dupA) of BRCA2 (putative mutations - four novel) as well as fourteen amino acid substitutions were identified. Twelve BRCA1 and BRCA2 missense variants were identified as unique and novel. In the cohort of 20 sporadic female patients no mutations were found.     

Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Many cases of hereditary breast cancer are due to mutations in either the BRCA1 or the BRCA2 gene. The histopathological changes in these cancers are often characteristic of the mutant gene. We hypothesized that the genes expressed by these two types of tumors are also distinctive, perhaps allowing us to identify cases of hereditary breast cancer on the basis of gene-expression profiles. METHODS: RNA from samples of primary tumor from seven carriers of the BRCA1 mutation, seven carriers of the BRCA2 mutation, and seven patients with sporadic cases of breast cancer was compared with a microarray of 6512 complementary DNA clones of 5361 genes. Statistical analyses were used to identify a set of genes that could distinguish the BRCA1 genotype from the BRCA2 genotype. RESULTS: Permutation analysis of multivariate classification functions established that the gene-expression profiles of tumors with BRCA1 mutations, tumors with BRCA2 mutations, and sporadic tumors differed significantly from each other. An analysis of variance between the levels of gene expression and the genotype of the samples identified 176 genes that were differentially expressed in tumors with BRCA1 mutations and tumors with BRCA2 mutations. Given the known properties of some of the genes in this panel, our findings indicate that there are functional differences between breast tumors with BRCA1 mutations and those with BRCA2 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly different groups of genes are expressed by breast cancers with BRCA1 mutations and breast cancers with BRCA2 mutations. Our results suggest that a heritable mutation influences the gene-expression profile of the cancer.     

Hereditary cancer predispositions: Comparison of multigene panel sequencing on fresh-frozen breast/ovarian tumor versus blood

In breast or ovarian cancer (BC/OC) patients with evocative personal and/or family history, multigene panel sequencing is performed on blood to diagnose hereditary predispositions. Additionally, BRCA1/BRCA2 testing can be performed on tumor sample for therapeutic purpose. The accuracy of multigene panel tumor analysis on BC/OC to detect predisposing germline pathogenic variants (gPV) has not been precisely assessed. By comparing sequencing data from blood and fresh-frozen tumor we show that tumor genomic instability causes pitfalls to consider when performing tumor testing to detect gPV. Even if loss of heterozygosity increases germline signal in most cases, somatic copy number variants (CNV) can mask germline CNV and collapse point gPV variant allele frequency (VAF). Moreover, VAF does not allow an accurate distinction between germline and somatic pathogenic variants.     

Bi‐allelic alterations in DNA repair genes underpin homologous recombination DNA repair defects in breast cancer

Homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair‐deficient (HRD) breast cancers have been shown to be sensitive to DNA repair targeted therapies. Burgeoning evidence suggests that sporadic breast cancers, lacking germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, may also be HRD. We developed a functional ex vivo RAD51‐based test to identify HRD primary breast cancers. An integrated approach examining methylation, gene expression, and whole‐exome sequencing was employed to ascertain the aetiology of HRD. Functional HRD breast cancers displayed genomic features of lack of competent HR, including large‐scale state transitions and specific mutational signatures. Somatic and/or germline genetic alterations resulting in bi‐allelic loss‐of‐function of HR genes underpinned functional HRD in 89% of cases, and were observed in only one of the 15 HR‐proficient samples tested. These findings indicate the importance of a comprehensive genetic assessment of bi‐allelic alterations in the HR pathway to deliver a precision medicine‐based approach to select patients for therapies targeting tumour‐specific DNA repair defects. Copyright © 2017 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

BRCA1 Mutations in Familial Ovarian Cancer

BRCA1 mutation research in ovarian and breast cancer 17q21-linked families has yielded a large number of germline sequence variations. Somatic mutations have been uncommonly reported. We screened 81 probands with primary ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube carcinoma for BRCA1 mutations. The study group was intentionally biased by the inclusion of 29 probands with a family history of ovarian and/or breast carcinoma, 13 probands diagnosed on or before age 45, seven individuals with a metachronous breast cancer and 51 tumors with BRCA1 LOH. Tumor and/or germline DNA was screened by modified techniques of single-strand confirmation polymorphism analysis, and abnormal banding patterns were sequenced to confirm mutations. Twenty-one (25.9%) BRCA1 sequence variations were identified. Eight mutations were somatic including seven null mutations. Apart from classical hereditary ovarian/breast cancer, a family history of ovarian/breast cancer defines a subset of ovarian cancer individuals with a significant likelihood of either a germline or a somatic BRCA1 gene sequence variation.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women with familial or early-onset breast/ovarian cancer in the Czech Republic

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The complete coding sequence analysis of both genes was carried out in 197 breast/ovarian cancer patients from high-risk families and 53 patients with sporadic breast/ovarian cancer. In summary, 59 mutations (16 different) in BRCA1 and 29 mutations (17 different) in BRCA2 were identified in unrelated breast and/or ovarian index cases. Using the BIC Database numbering, the most frequently found mutations in BRCA1 were c.5385dupC (22 cases), c.3819_3823delGTAAA (8 cases) and c.300T>G (6 cases). The most frequently found mutations in BRCA2 were c.8138_8142delCCTTT (7 cases) and c.8765_8766delAG (7 cases). Altogether, these 5 mutations represented 56.8% of all detected mutations. A broad spectrum of other mutations was detected including four novel mutations (c.2881delA in BRCA1; and c. 6677_6678delAA, c.6982dupT and c.8397_8400dupTGGG in BRCA2). Deleterious mutations were found in 80 (40.6%) of 197 high risk-families, in 6 (37.5%) of 16 patients with sporadic bilateral breast, ovarian or both cancers and in 2 (6.2%) of 32 women with sporadic early-onset unilateral breast cancer. No mutation was detected in 5 cases of sporadic early-onset unilateral ovarian cancer.     

Complex germline rearrangement of BRCA1 associated with breast and ovarian cancer

Germline mutations in BRCA1 predispose to breast and ovarian cancer. Most germline BRCA1 mutations are small insertions, deletions, or single base pair (bp) substitutions. These mutation classes are rarely found as somatic mutations in BRCA1. On the other hand, somatic deletions of multiple mega-base pairs (Mb) including BRCA1, as reflected by loss of heterozygosity, occur frequently in both inherited and sporadic breast and ovarian cancers. To determine whether deletions or rearrangements of hundreds to thousands of bps might contribute to inherited mutation in BRCA1, we developed a Long PCR strategy for screening the entire genomic BRCA1 locus in high-risk families. We evaluated genomic DNA from one high-risk family of European ancestry with BRCA1-linked cancer in which no genomic mutations had been detected using conventional methods. Long PCR revealed a complex mutation, g.12977 ins10 del1039 (based on GenBank L78833), comprising an inverted duplication and deletion in BRCA1 that removes portions of exon 3 and intron 3, including the 5' splice site for intron 3. As a result of the deletion, exon 3 is skipped, leading to a truncated protein and disease predisposition. Unlike previously reported large germline deletions in BRCA1, neither breakpoint resides within an Alu element. The g.12977 ins10 del1039 mutation was not detected among 11 other breast cancer families, nor among 406 breast cancer patients unselected for family history.     

DNA array-based method for detection of large rearrangements in the BRCA1 gene

In most families with multiple cases of breast and ovarian cancer, the cancer appears to be associated with germline alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. However, somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors are rare, even though loss of heterozygosity in BRCA1 and BRCA2 loci in these tumors appears frequently. This may be attributed to mutation detection assays that detect alterations in the coding regions and splice site junctions, but that miss large gene rearrangements. To look specifically for mutations such as large gene rearrangements that span several kilobases (kb) of genomic DNA, we have developed a fluorescence DNA microarray assay. This assay rapidly and simultaneously screens for such rearrangements along the entire gene. In our screen of 15 malignant ovarian tumors, we found one sample with a novel 3-kb deletion encompassing exon 17 of BRCA1 that leads to a frameshift mutation. This deletion was not detected in the corresponding constitutive DNA. Our results indicate that, whereas somatic mutations in BRCA1 appear to be rare in ovarian cancers, the search for large gene rearrangements should be included in any BRCA1 mutational analysis. Furthermore, the method described in this report has the potential to screen clinical tumor samples for genomic rearrangements simultaneously in a large number of cancer-associated genes.     

Genetic Pathways of Colorectal Carcinogenesis Rarely Involve the PTEN and LKB1 Genes Outside the Inherited Hamartoma Syndromes

Germline mutations of the PTEN/MMAC1/TEP and LKB1 genes cause hamartomas to develop in the gastrointestinal tracts of patients with Cowden syndrome and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, respectively. PTEN mutations may also be responsible for some cases of juvenile polyposis. Histologically, hamartomas appear benign, but there is good evidence that in these syndromes, the hamartomas can progress to colorectal carcinoma. It remains unknown whether or not cancers that develop from hamartomas acquire a spectrum of mutations similar to those in sporadic colon cancers. PTEN and LKB1 are candidate genes for mutations in sporadic colon cancers, either as initiating events in tumorigenesis or providing a selective advantage during tumor growth. Using single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis, we have screened a set of sporadic colon cancers for somatic mutations in PTEN and LKB1. No variants predicted to alter protein function were detected in LKB1, but 1 of 72 cancers showed a somatic mutation in PTEN, together with allele loss. This cancer did not have a detectable APC mutation or allele loss at APC. It remains possible that PTEN and LKB1 are inactivated in other sporadic colon cancers by means such as deletion or promoter methylation. Like BRCA1 and BRCA2, however, it appears that PTEN and LKB1 mutations can cause cancers when present in the germline, but occur rarely in the soma.     

Somatic genetic alterations in BRCA2‐associated and sporadic male breast cancer

The genetic changes underlying the development and progression of male breast cancer are poorly understood. Germline BRCA2 mutations account for a significant part of male breast cancer, but the majority of patients lack a known inherited predisposition. We recently demonstrated that the progression of breast cancer in female carriers of a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation follows specific genetic pathways, distinct from each other and from sporadic breast cancer. In the present study, we performed a genome‐wide survey by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) of somatic genetic aberrations in 26 male breast cancers, including five tumors from BRCA2 mutation carriers. BRCA2 tumors exhibited a significantly higher number of chromosomal aberrations than sporadic tumors. The most common alterations in sporadic male breast cancer were +1q (38%), +8q (33%), +17q (33%), –13q (29%), and –8p (24%). In tumors from BRCA2 mutation carriers, the five most common genetic changes were +8q (100%), +20q (100%), +17q (80%), –13q (80%), and –6q (60%). The CGH results in these two groups of male breast cancers are almost identical to those identified in the corresponding sporadic and BRCA2‐associated female breast cancers. The results suggest that despite substantial hormonal differences between females and males, similar genetic changes are selected for during tumor progression. Furthermore, the presence of a highly penetrant germline BRCA2 mutation apparently leads to a characteristic somatic tumor progression pathway, again shared between affected male and female mutation carriers. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 24:56–61, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

TP53 mutations in familial breast cancer: functional aspects

Mutation in p53 (TP53) remains one of the most commonly described genetic events in human neoplasia. The occurrence of mutations is somewhat less common in sporadic breast carcinomas than in other cancers, with an overall frequency of about 20%. There is, however, evidence that p53 is mutated at a significantly higher frequency in breast carcinomas arising in carriers of germ-line BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Some of the p53 mutants identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are either previously undescribed or infrequently reported in sporadic human cancers. Functional characterization of such mutants in various systems has revealed that they frequently possess properties not commonly associated with those occurring in sporadic cases: they retain apoptosis-inducing, transactivating, and growth-inhibitory activities similar to the wild-type protein, yet are compromised for transformation suppression and also possess an independent transforming phenotype. The occurrence of such mutants in familial breast cancer implies the operation of distinct selective pressures during tumorigenesis in BRCA-associated breast cancers.