Novel Insights of Jailed Balloon and Jailed Corsair Technique for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Bifurcation Lesions

BackgroundThe optimal technique for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a bifurcation lesion remains uncertain. JBT/JCT techniques are now emerging for protection of the side branch (SB). We aimed to compare jailed balloon (JBT) and jailed Corsair (JCT) techniques to the conventional jailed wire technique.MethodsWe analyzed 850 consecutive patients (995 bifurcation lesions), who underwent PCI. The bifurcation lesions were classified as jailed wire (?), jailed wire (+), JBT, and JCT. We assessed temporary thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade ≤2, permanent TIMI flow grade ≤2 in the SB, and SB occlusion related myocardial infarction and compared these endpoints with inverse probability treatment weighted analysis.ResultsThe percentage of each group is as follows: jailed wire (?); 44.7%; jailed wire (+) 50.9%; JBT 1.7%; JCT 2.7%. The Corsair could not be delivered with a stent because of severe calcifications (3.7%) and a jailed balloon was entrapped with the stent after dilatation (5.9%). Compared to the jailed wire (+), JBT/JCT had a higher percentage of true bifurcations, arterial sheath size ≥7 Fr, and a lower proportion of wire recrossing (all, P < 0.05). After adjustment, temporary and permanent TIMI flow grade ≤2 in the SB, and SB occlusion related myocardial infarction were not significantly different (OR: 1.08, CI: 0.32–3.71, P = 0.90; OR: 0.88, CI: 0.11–6.91, P = 0.91; OR: 1.94, CI: 0.23–16.5, P = 0.55 respectively).ConclusionsOur data could not prove the efficacy of JBT/JCT, but revealed novel insights about these techniques. A larger study is necessary to prove the efficacy of JBT/JCT.     

Long‐term outcome of provisional side‐branch T‐stenting for the treatment of unprotected distal left main coronary artery disease

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on distal left main (LM) remains an independent predictor of poor outcome. The strategy of implanting one stent on the main branch (MB), with provisional stenting on the side‐branch (SB) only when required (provisional T‐stenting), has become the default approach to most bifurcation lesions. This prospective registry sought to investigate the long‐term safety and efficacy of provisional SB T‐stenting for the treatment of unprotected distal LM disease in patients undergoing PCI. From January 2006 to May 2009, 107 consecutive patients affected by unprotected distal LM disease underwent PCI at our center with the intent to use a provisional SB‐stenting technique. We evaluated the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at long‐term follow‐up (up to 12–41 months). Procedural success was obtained in 98% of patients. A final kissing balloon inflation was performed in 95% and intravascular ultrasound in 83% of patients. Additional stenting on the SB after provisional stenting on MB was required in 29% of lesions. Long‐term follow‐up (3.5 years; 25–75th percentile and 1.1–4.5 years) was completed in 97% of patients. The cumulative incidence of MACE was 32.7%: all‐cause death was 15.8%, nonfatal myocardial infarction 8.4%, and target vessel revascularization 21.5%. At multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval: 2.01–3.32, P = 0.03), European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (HR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04–1.33, P = 0.02), and diabetes mellitus (HR 3.48, 95% CI: 1.12–6.87, P = 0.01) were identified as independent predictors of MACE. In patients with unprotected distal LM disease undergoing PCI, a provisional strategy of stenting the MB only is associated with good long‐term clinical outcomes. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Provisional stenting for multivessel PCI

Background: Bare stents reduce acute complications and repeat revascularization following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but are costly and may lead to in‐stent restenosis. It remains unclear whether stents should be universally implanted or whether provisional stenting mainly to suboptimal balloon dilatation results is an acceptable approach for multivessel PCI. Objective: To compare the long‐term clinical restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) of stented and non‐stented coronary artery lesions in patients who had multivessel PCI. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis of matched data from 129 consecutive patients who underwent multivessel PCI (at least optimal balloon angioplasty to one coronary artery segment and balloon angioplasty plus stenting to another coronary artery in the same patient, all lesions are de novo native coronary artery lesions with vessel diameter ?2.5?mm). The study endpoint was restenosis and repeat revascularization at one‐year follow‐up. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Low in‐hospital MACE (3.1%). Acute myocardial infarction, emergency revascularization via either PCI or CABG was detected and angiographic success was achieved in 99.3% of lesions in both groups. The rate of clinically driven angiographic restenosis and TLR at one‐year (follow‐up?100%) was similar (17.1% versus 18.6%, P?=?0.871, and 13.9% versus 16.3%, P?=?0.728, for optimal balloon angioplasty versus provisional stenting. Conclusions: The main findings from this study are that long‐term angiographic restenosis and TLR was comparable for optimal balloon angioplasty and provisional stenting, suggesting that provisional stenting is an acceptable approach for multivessel PCI.     

A Novel‐Modified Provisional Bifurcation Stenting Technique: Jailed Semi‐Inflated Balloon Technique

Objective

We proposed a new technique for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, called jailed semi‐inflated balloon technique (JSBT).

Background

Currently, provisional approach is recommended to treat most of coronary bifurcation lesions. However, it is associated with the risk of side branch (SB) occlusion after main vessel (MV) stenting due to plaque or carina shift into the SB. The SB occlusion may cause peri‐procedural myonecrosis or hemodynamic compromise. Therefore, strategies are needed to reduce the SB occlusion during provisional approach.

Methods

Between September 2014 and April 2015, we selected 137 patients (104 male, 33 female; mean age 63.6 ± 11.7 years) with 148 distinct coronary bifurcation lesions underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using JSBT. All patients were followed with hospital visits or telephone contact up to 1 month.

Results

The majority of the patients had acute coronary syndrome (64.2%) and Medina 1.1.1. bifurcation lesions (62.8%). The lesion localization was distal left main (LM) coronary artery in 28 patients. After the MV stenting, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow was established in 100% of both MV and SB. There was no SB occlusion in any patient. There was no major adverse cardiac event during in‐hospital stay and 1 month follow‐up.

Conclusions

The JSBT technique can be successfully performed in both LM and non‐LM bifurcation lesion. This technique provides high rate of procedural success, excellent SB protection during MV stenting and excellent immediate clinical outcome. (J Interven Cardiol 2015;28:420–429)

     

The Acute Changes of Fractional Flow Reserve in DK (Double Kissing), Crush,and 1‐Stent Technique for True Bifurcation Lesions

Background: While many studies confirmed the importance of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in guiding complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), data regarding the significance of FFR for bifurcation lesions are still lacking. Methods: Between October 2008 and October 2009, 51 patients with true bifurcation lesions were consecutively enrolled and randomized into double kissing (DK) crush (n = 25), and provisional 1‐stent (n = 26) groups. FFR measurements at baseline and hyperemia were measured at pre‐PCI, post‐PCI, and at 8‐month follow‐up. Results: Clinical follow‐ups were available in 100% of patients while only 33% of patients underwent angiographic follow‐up. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were matched between the 2 groups. Pre‐PCI FFR of the main branch (MB) in the DK group was 0.76 ± 0.15, which was significantly lower than in the provisional 1‐stent group (0.83 ± 0.10, P = 0.029). This difference disappeared after the PCI procedure (0.92 ± 0.04 vs. 0.92 ± 0.05, P = 0.58). There were no significant differences in terms of baseline, angiographic, procedural indexes, and FFR of side branch (SB) between the 2 treatment arms. However, immediately after PCI, the patient with DK crush had higher FFR in the SB as compared to the provisional 1‐stent group (0.94 ± 0.03 vs. 0.90 ± 0.08, P = 0.028, respectively) and also they had lower diameter stenosis (8.59 ± 6.41% vs. 15.62 ± 11.69%, P = 0.015, respectively). Conclusion: In the acute phase, immediately after PCI for bifurcation lesion, DK crush stenting was associated with higher FFR and lower residual diameter stenosis in the SB, as compared with the provisional 1‐stent group. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:341–345)     

Contradictory Shear Stress Distribution Prevents Restenosis after Provisional Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions

Background: Endothelial shear stress is one of the local hemodynamic factors suspected in the development of coronary atherosclerosis in bifurcation lesions. In patients with provisional stenting, the endothelial shear stress (SS) distribution is unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the magnitude and distribution of the SS of coronary bifurcation lesions stenting by the provisional approach. Methods: Ten consecutive patients were included in this study. Quantitative coronary analysis, flow study, and three‐dimensional computational analysis with the aid of the commercial software CD STAR‐CCM+ were done before and after the provisional stenting procedure and also 8 months later. Results: Clinical and angiographic follow‐up were available in all patients. No patient had a side branch (SB) stent. At the 8‐month follow‐up, no major adverse cardiac event (MACE) occurred. There was also no clinical and angiographic restenosis. Before PCI, the distal main vessel (MV)‐lateral, and the SB‐lateral subsegments had relative nonsignificant lower SS value (4.08 ± 2.78 Pa and 4.35 ± 5.04 Pa, respectively) when compared to other segments. After 8‐month follow‐up, sustained decreased SS value was shown in the distal MV‐lateral segment (4.08 ± 2.78–1.68 ± 1.65 Pa), when compared with significantly increased SS value in the SB‐lateral subsegment 4.35 ± 5.04–16.50 ± 40.45 Pa). The explanation is that after stenting in the MV, the flow was redistributed immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and reversed back to its original 8 months later. However, the growth of the fibrous tissue causing in‐stent restenosis (ISR) is prohibited by sirolimus on the stent struts. In contrast, in a branch opened up by plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), the flow did not change much, the flow could even be worse because it is shifted to the MV after the cross‐sectional area of the MV improved by stenting. However, thanks to POBA, there is increased fibrous tissue formation, enough to increase the SS and prevent further accumulation of cell and cholesterol needed for more restenosis. Conclusion: In the provisional approach, low endothelial SS correlated with no restenosis for patients who underwent stenting of the MV, while a contradictory combination of high SS and no restenosis was seen in the SB after only POBA. The mechanism of prevention of restenosis in the SB is by increasing the SS while in the MV, the mechanism of prevention of ISR is secondary to sirolimus on the stents struts. (J Interven Cardiol 2010;23:319–329)     

True caring is protecting who is at your side

• The modified jailed balloon technique (MJBT) is a safe and effective tool for preserving immediate and long‐term side branch (SB) patency when treating true bifurcation lesions.
• This technique could be routinely implemented, or selectively chosen when the risk of SB occlusion is high and a two‐stent technique is not desirable.
• A randomized study comparing provisional stenting with the MJBT versus systematic two‐stent strategy for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions is warranted.

     

Percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcations: lesion preparation before provisional bare metal stenting and subsequent immunosuppression with oral prednisone. The IMPRESS-Y study

Aim of the study was to assess the clinical and angiographic efficacy of oral treatment with prednisone at immunosuppressive dosage after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with bifurcation lesions treated with elective bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in the main-branch (MB) and provisional stenting in the side-branch (SB). Twenty-five patients were treated on 29 bifurcation lesions (58 vessel segments). Lesion preparation before stenting was performed with atherectomy in 7 cases, and balloon PCI over double wires in all other cases; none was treated directly with stents. The mean length of stents implanted in the MB was 19.6 +/- 4.9 mm (10-30 mm). Balloon PCI was successful in 23 of 29 SB and provisional stenting was needed in 6 SB (21%). All patients received oral prednisone according to the immunosuppressive protocol previously reported (1 mg/kg/day/10 days, 0.5 mg/kg/day/20 days, 0.25 mg/kg/day/15 days). At 12 months, one patient had recurrence of angina (4%) and two patients underwent repeated target lesion revascularization (8%). No patient died or had stent thrombosis. Quantitative coronary analysis was performed in all patients at 8 months. Global restenosis rate per vessel was 8.6% (5/58), and 17.2% (5/29) per lesion. The restenosis rate and late lumen loss were 3.4% and 0.36 +/- 0.6 mm, and 13.8% and 0.47 +/- 0.46 mm in the MB and the SB, respectively. Single stent implantation in the MB and provisional stenting of the SB is feasible in most cases after adequate lesion preparation. The systemic treatment with oral prednisone after BMS implantation offers good clinical and angiographic results even in the difficult setting of bifurcation lesions.     

Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI)

ObjectivesThis study sought to compare the outcomes of fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided and angiography (Angio)–guided provisional side-branch (SB) stenting for true coronary bifurcation lesions.BackgroundAngio-guided provisional SB stenting after stenting of the main vessel provides favorable outcomes for the majority of coronary bifurcation lesions. Whether an FFR-guided provisional stenting approach is superior has not been studied.MethodsA total of 320 patients with single Medina 1,1,1 and 0,1,1 coronary bifurcation lesions undergoing stenting with a provisional SB approach were randomly assigned 1:1 to Angio-guided and FFR-guided groups. SB stenting was performed for Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade <3, ostial SB stenosis >70%, or greater than type A dissection after main vessel stenting in the Angio-guided group and for SB-FFR <0.80 in the FFR-guided group. The primary endpoint was the 1-year composite rate of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization).ResultsComparing the Angio-guided and FFR-guided groups, treatment of the SB (balloon or stenting) was performed in 63.1% and 56.3% of lesions respectively (p = 0.07); stenting of the SB was attempted in 38.1% and 25.9%, respectively (p = 0.01); and, when attempted, stenting was successful in 83.6% and 73.3% of SBs, respectively (p = 0.01). The 1-year composite major adverse cardiac event rate was 18.1% in both groups (hazard ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.48 to 1.88; p = 1.00). The 1-year target vessel revascularization and stent thrombosis rates were 6.9% and 5.6% (p = 0.82) and 1.3% and 0.6% (p = 0.56) in the Angio-guided and FFR-guided groups, respectively.ConclusionsIn this multicenter, randomized trial, angiographic and FFR guidance of provisional SB stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions provided similar 1-year clinical outcomes. (Randomized Study on DK Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions; ChiCTR-TRC-07000015)     

Active SB-P Versus Conventional Approach to the Protection of High-Risk Side Branches: The CIT-RESOLVE Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine whether an active side branch protection (SB-P) strategy is superior to the conventional strategy in reducing side branch (SB) occlusion in high-risk bifurcation treatment.BackgroundAccurate prediction of SB occlusion after main vessel stenting followed by the use of specific strategies to prevent occlusion would be beneficial during bifurcation intervention.MethodsEligible patients who had a bifurcation lesions with high risk for occlusion as determined using the validated V-RESOLVE (Visual Estimation for Risk Prediction of Side Branch Occlusion in Coronary Bifurcation Intervention) score were randomized to an active SB-P strategy group (elective 2-stent strategy for large SBs and jailed balloon technique for small SBs) or a conventional strategy group (provisional stenting for large SBs and jailed wire technique for small SBs) in a 1:1 ratio stratified by SB vessel size. The primary endpoint of SB occlusion was defined as an angiography core laboratory–assessed decrease in TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade or absence of flow in the SB immediately after full apposition of the main vessel stent to the vessel wall.ResultsA total of 335 subjects at 16 sites were randomized to the SB-P group (n = 168) and conventional group (n = 167). Patients in the SB-P versus conventional strategy group had a significantly lower rate of SB occlusion (7.7% [13 of 168] vs. 18.0% [30 of 167]; risk difference: –9.1%; 95% confidence interval: −13.1% to −1.8%; p = 0.006), driven mainly by the difference in the small SB subgroup (jailed balloon technique vs. jailed wire technique: 8.1% vs. 18.5%; p = 0.01).ConclusionsAn active SB-P strategy is superior to a conventional strategy in reducing SB occlusion when treating high-risk bifurcation lesions. (Conventional Versus Intentional Strategy in Patients With High Risk Prediction of Side Branch Occlusion in Coronary Bifurcation Intervention [CIT-RESOLVE]; NCT02644434)     

Clinical outcomes following bioresorbable scaffold implantation for bifurcation lesions: Overall outcomes and comparison between provisional and planned double stenting strategy

The aim of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes of patients treated with a provisional stenting (PS) versus a double stenting (DS) strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions with bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS). There are limited data available with regards to outcomes following BRS implantation for bifurcation lesions. A total of 132 bifurcation lesions treated with BRS between 2012 and 2014 were analyzed. Of the total of 132 bifurcation lesions, 10 lesions were treated without crossover stenting. 99 lesions (81%) were treated with a PS strategy and 23 lesions (19%) with a DS strategy. The DS group consisted of patients with a greater number of true bifurcation lesions (PS 52.0% vs. DS 91.3%: P < 0.001). In the PS group, seven lesions (7.1%) were crossed‐over to T‐stenting. In the DS group, 13 lesions (57%) were treated with BRS to the side branch (SB). A hybrid stenting technique [BRS to the main branch, and metallic drug‐eluting stent (DES) to the SB] was utilized in 10 (43%) lesions. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates were 5.5% for PS and 11.2% for DS (P = 0.49) at 1‐year follow‐up. Definite scaffold thrombosis did not occur at the site of any bifurcation lesion. These findings suggest that BRS implantation for bifurcation lesions is technically feasible. The rates of TLR tended to be higher in the DS group compared to when a PS strategy was employed. Larger studies are eagerly awaited to determine longer‐term follow‐up of this treatment strategy. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Prospective evaluation of myocardial ischemia related to post‐procedural side‐branch stenosis in bifurcated lesions treated by provisional approach with drug‐eluting stents

Objectives : To prospectively assess the impact of post‐procedural side‐branch (SB) stenosis on inducible myocardial ischemia in patients with bifurcated lesions undergoing percutaneous interventions. Background : Provisional‐stenting with drug‐eluting stents (DES) is the recommended strategy to treat percutaneously bifurcated lesions but is associated to variable degrees of residual SB stenosis. The role of SB residual stenosis on post‐procedural myocardial ischemia is uncertain. Methods : Patients with bifurcations treated by DES according to provisional‐stenting technique were enrolled in the study if they had no other untreated lesion. Patients were divided into two groups according to post‐procedural 3D‐quantitative coronary analysis (3DQCA): group OR (optimal result: stenosis < 50% of SB lumen area at 3DQCA) and group SR, suboptimal result: (stenosis ≥ 50% of SB lumen area at 3DQCA). Treadmill exercise stress test (EST) was performed within 1 week from PCI. The primary study endpoint was myocardial ischemia (≥1 mm ST‐segment depression at EST). Results : Sixty patients were enrolled: 49 (81.7%) comprised group OR and 11 (18.3%) group SR. Post‐PCI myocardial ischemia at EST was inducible in 17 (34.7%) patients of group OR versus 10 (90.9%) patients of group SR (P = 0.0007). During the follow‐up, patients of Group SR (vs. Group OR) had a significantly higher occurrence of inducible myocardial ischemia during late (>8 weeks) stress tests (P < 0.001). Conclusions : In patients with bifurcated lesions treated by a provisional‐stenting technique, residual SB stenosis ≥ 50% at 3DQCA is associated with post‐procedural inducible myocardial ischemia at EST. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Drug eluting stenting in bifurcation coronary lesions long-term results applying a systematic treatment strategy

Objectives : To explore the long‐term results following implantation of drug‐eluting stents (DES) in bifurcation lesions according to contemporary “real world” practice. Background : Limited information is available on the long‐term outcomes of patients with bifurcation lesions who are treated using DES. A systematic approach for bifurcation lesion management was applied, using either a “provisional” single stent technique or a dedicated two stents strategy according to the side‐branch diameter and severity of its ostial stenosis. Methods : Four hundred one consecutive patients underwent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using DES and were included in our prospective registry. All adverse events were recorded up to 2 years and distinguished according to the planned PCI strategy (e.g., one versus two stents technique). Results : A planned two stents strategy was used in 141 patients (35% of patients). In 260 patients (65%), the planned treatment involved stenting of the main branch only with “provisional” stenting of the side‐branch according to procedural course. Thus, 24 patients (9.2%) needed additional stenting at the side‐branch to complete the PCI. Cumulative major adverse cardiac event rate at 1 and 2 years was similar for both groups (11.4% vs. 14.8% at 1 year and 19.4% vs. 25.7% at 2 years for the single vs. two stents groups, accordingly, P = NS for both). Likewise, there was no difference in mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, need for target lesions or target vessel revascularization, or definite stent thrombosis rate between the two groups at 6, 12, and 2 years follow‐up. The rate of angiographically confirmed (i.e., definite) stent thrombosis did not differ between the two groups during follow‐up. Conclusions : Our study revealed favorable long‐term clinical results following DES implantation using a systematic, rather simplified approach towards bifurcation stenting and using either a single or double stenting technique. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Clinical Outcomes Following Coronary Bifurcation PCI Techniques: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comprising 5,711 Patients

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of different bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques.BackgroundDespite several randomized trials, the optimal PCI technique for bifurcation lesions remains a matter of debate. Provisional stenting has been recommended as the default technique for most bifurcation lesions. Emerging data support double-kissing crush (DK-crush) as a 2-stent technique.MethodsPubMed and Scopus were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing PCI bifurcation techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions. Outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes of interest were cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel or lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis. Summary odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using Bayesian network meta-analysis.ResultsTwenty-one randomized controlled trials including 5,711 patients treated using 5 bifurcation PCI techniques were included. Investigated techniques were provisional stenting, T stenting/T and protrusion, crush, culotte, and DK-crush. Median follow-up duration was 12 months (interquartile range: 9 to 36 months). When all techniques were considered, patients treated using the DK-crush technique had less occurrence of MACE (OR: 0.39; 95% credible interval: 0.26 to 0.55) compared with those treated using provisional stenting, driven by a reduction in target lesion revascularization (OR: 0.36; 95% credible interval: 0.22 to 0.57). No differences were found in cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis among analyzed PCI techniques. No differences in MACE were observed among provisional stenting, culotte, T stenting/T and protrusion, and crush. In non–left main bifurcations, DK-crush reduced MACE (OR: 0.42; 95% credible interval: 0.24 to 0.66).ConclusionsIn this network meta-analysis, DK-crush was associated with fewer MACE, driven by lower rates of repeat revascularization, whereas no significant differences among techniques were observed for cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. A clinical benefit of 2-stent techniques was observed over provisional stenting in bifurcation with side branch lesion length ≥10 mm.     

Provisional T-stenting and kissing balloon in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: results of the French multicenter "TULIPE" study.

BACKGROUND: In previous prospective studies, a strategy of (a) stenting of the main branch, (b) provisional T-stenting of the side branch, and (c) final kissing balloon inflation, was associated with high success and low target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates on the long-term. OBJECTIVES: To examine the performance of this strategy in a multicenter study. METHODS: Consecutive patients were treated at 14 French medical centers for de novo coronary bifurcation lesions with the same technique used. Immediate results and clinically-driven TLR at 7 months were examined. RESULTS: The mean reference diameters of the main and side branches were 3.2 +/- 0.6 mm and 2.4 +/- 0.5 mm, respectively. The side branch was stented in 34% of patients. A <30% residual stenosis in the main branch was achieved in 99%, <50% in the side branch in 90%, and both in 89% of procedures. The in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular event were a Q-wave and 5 non-Qwaves MI (0.54% and 2.7%). At 7 months of follow-up, 3 patients (1.76%) had died, 1 suffered a non-Q-wave MI (0.59%), and 28 (15.88%) underwent TLR. By multivariate analysis, a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (OR: 0.934), moderate calcifications (OR: 7.86), and non-use of the "jailed" wire technique (OR: 4.26) were associated with reinterventions during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of provisional T-stenting with a tubular stent and final kissing balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions was safe and associated with a low TLR rate at 7 months. This strategy should be applicable to the new era of drug eluting stents.     

Immediate results of bifurcational stenting assessed with optical coherence tomography

Background : A tubular stent may adapt with difficulty to coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs). Methods : Time domain or frequency domain (FD) optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed to assess strut apposition immediately after stent implantation across four segments inside the bifurcation, in a consecutive series of patients. OCT pullbacks were performed in the main vessel (MV). Results : A total of 13,142 struts in 45 CBL in 41 patients were assessed. Strut malapposition was significantly more frequent in the half bifurcation facing the side‐branch (SB) ostium (42.9%) than in the proximal segment of the bifurcation 11.8%, half bifurcation opposite the SB 6.7%, or the distal segment 5.7% (all P < 0.0001). Lesions (n = 15) treated with stenting of both MV and SB had a total higher rate of malapposition than those (n = 30) treated with stenting of the MV only (17.6% vs. 9.5%; P = 0.0014). In latter group, lesions treated with FD‐OCT‐guided stent implantation (n = 13) presented a lower rate of malapposition than those treated with conventional angiographic‐guided stent implantation (n = 17) (7.1% vs. 17.5%; P = 0.005). Conclusions : In CBL, strut malapposition is particularly high at the SB ostium. However, a strategy of stenting MV only with adjunctive FD‐OCT guidance is associated with lower rates of malapposition. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Validity and variability in visual assessment of stenosis severity in phantom bifurcation lesions: a survey in experts during the fifth meeting of the European Bifurcation Club

Objectives : To investigate the adequacy of visual estimate regarding the percent diameter stenosis (DS) in bifurcation lesions. Background: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is more accurate and precise compared to visual estimate in assessing stenosis severity in single‐vessel lesions. Methods: Thirty‐six experts in the field of bifurcation PCI visually assessed the DS in cine images of five precision manufactured phantom bifurcation lesions, experts being blinded to the true values. Expert DS estimates were compared with the true values and they were also used to define the Medina class of each individual bifurcation. Results were pooled together both for proximal main vessel (PMV), distal main vessel (DMV) and side‐branch (SB) segments and for vessel segments with similar DS values. Results: Individual performance was highly variable among observers; pooled values and range of accuracy and precision were 2.79% (?6.67% to 17.33%) and 8.69% (4.31–16.25%), respectively. On average, DS was underestimated in the PMV (?1.08%, P = 0.10) and overestimated in the DMV (3.86% P < 0.01) and SB segments (5.58%, P < 0.01). Variability in visual estimates was significantly larger in lesions of medium severity compared to the clearly obstructive ones (P < 0.01); the latter were consistently overestimated. Inter‐observer agreement was moderate (κ = 0.55) over the entire number of estimates. However, if the segments with true DS = 0% were excluded, agreement was diminished (κ = 0.27). Inter‐observer agreement in Medina class was rather low (κ = 0.21). True bifurcation lesions were misclassified as non‐true ones in 14/180 estimates. Conclusions: Visual assessment by experts is more variable and less precise in the analysis of bifurcation lesions compared to bifurcation QCA software. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The Importance of Bifurcation Lesions in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BackgroundBifurcation lesions at the time of emergent PCI for STEMI are relatively common. However, there are little data regarding their significance. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of bifurcation lesions in the setting of emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).MethodsIn 391 patients who underwent primary and rescue PCI, the clinical characteristics, procedural success, and in-hospital cardiac events were compared retrospectively between the patients with and without bifurcation lesions. The PCI strategy was at the discretion of the operator.ResultsThe culprit artery involved a bifurcation lesion in 54/391 (14%) patients. The baseline clinical characteristics between the groups with and without bifurcation lesions were similar. The majority of bifurcation lesions (81%) were seen in the left anterior ascending (LAD) artery. All lesions were treated with the provisional stenting approach, and only 2 (3%) patients required 2 stents. There were no difference in the procedural success and the final TIMI-3 flow, but PCI of bifurcation lesion required higher amount of contrast use. There was no in-hospital MACE in the bifurcation group. The peak cardiac enzyme, left ventricular function, and length of stay were similar in these 2 groups.ConclusionsBifurcation lesions are relatively common in emergent PCI for STEMI involving the LAD. It can be safely treated with a provisional stenting approach, and the immediate outcome is similar to non-bifurcation lesions.     

Estrategia óptima para el tratamiento de lesiones en bifurcación del tronco coronario izquierdo

Introduction and objectivesThere are no guidelines regarding the most appropriate approach for provisional side branch (SB) intervention in left main (LM) bifurcation lesions.MethodsThe present prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial compared conservative vs aggressive strategies for provisional SB intervention during LM bifurcation treatment. Although the trial was designed to enroll 700 patients, it was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment. For 160 non-true bifurcation lesions, a 1-stent technique without kissing balloon inflation was applied in the conservative strategy, whereas a 1-stent technique with mandatory kissing balloon inflation was applied in the aggressive strategy. For 46 true bifurcation lesions, a stepwise approach was applied in the conservative strategy (after main vessel stenting, SB ballooning when residual stenosis > 75%; then, SB stenting if residual stenosis > 50% or there was a dissection). An elective 2-stent technique was applied in the aggressive strategy. The primary outcome was a 1-year target lesion failure (TLF) composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization.ResultsAmong non-true bifurcation lesions, the conservative strategy group used a smaller amount of contrast dye than the aggressive strategy group. There were no significant differences in 1-year TLF between the 2 strategies among non-true bifurcation lesions (6.5% vs 4.9%; HR, 1.31; 95%CI, 0.35-4.88; P = .687) and true bifurcation lesions (17.6% vs 21.7%; HR, 0.76; 95%CI, 0.20-2.83; P = .683).ConclusionsIn patients with a LM bifurcation lesion, conservative and aggressive strategies for a provisional SB approach have similar 1-year TLF rates.     

Using sheathless standard guiding catheters for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention to treat bifurcation lesions

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the feasibility and safety of using sheathless standard guiding catheters for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat bifurcation lesions.

METHODS:

Coronary bifurcation lesions were identified using angiography in 43 patients with coronary artery disease. These patients underwent transradial PCI using sheathless standard guiding catheters, and the procedural success and complication rates were recorded.

RESULTS:

All 43 patients underwent successful PCI. The Culotte stenting technique was used in 22 (51.2%) subjects, the Crush stenting technique was used in eight (18.8%) subjects and the crossover stenting implantation technique was used in 13 (30.0%) subjects. Of the 43 coronary artery bifurcation lesions, the final kissing balloon technique was performed in 39 (90.1%) lesions. Adjunctive devices used in the cohort included intravascular ultrasound for 32 (74.4%) patients, thrombus aspiration catheters for two patients and cutting balloon for five patients. During the perioperative period, no major complications associated with vessel puncture or adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events occurred in any of the 43 patients enrolled in the present study. At day 30, radial artery occlusion was detected in only three (2.5%) patients and radial artery stenosis in four (9.3%) patients. At six-month follow-up, 24 (55.8%) patients exhibited coronary artery patency with no significant intimal hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS:

Transradial PCI using the sheathless technique may be a feasible and safe technique to treat coronary bifurcation lesions.