Sentinel lymph node biopsy after percutaneous diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the technical success rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with nonpalpable infiltrating breast cancer diagnosed by using percutaneous core biopsy and to determine the frequency with which sentinel lymph node biopsy obviated axillary dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review revealed 33 women who underwent sentinel node biopsy after percutaneous core biopsy diagnosis of nonpalpable infiltrating breast cancer. Sentinel nodes were identified with radioisotope and blue dye; the procedure was technically successful if sentinel nodes were found at surgery. All sentinel nodes were excised. Axillary dissection was performed if tumor was present in sentinel nodes. RESULTS: Sentinel nodes were found at surgery in 30 women (91%). Sentinel nodes were identified with both radioisotope and blue dye in 22 (73%) of these women, with only radioisotope in six (20%), and with only blue dye in two (7%). Sentinel nodes were found in 12 (80%) of 15 women in the first half of the study versus all 18 (100%) women in the second half (P = .08). Sentinel nodes were free of tumor in 23 (77%) of 30 women. In six (86%) of seven women with tumor in sentinel nodes, the sentinel nodes were the only nodes with tumor. CONCLUSION: Sentinel node biopsy was successful in 30 women (91%) with nonpalpable infiltrating carcinoma diagnosed with percutaneous core biopsy and obviated axillary dissection in 23 women (70%). Using both radioisotope and blue dye may increase the success rate. A learning curve exists, and success improves with experience.     

Sentinel node detection in pre-operative axillary staging

The concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery is based on the fact that the tumour drains in a logical way via the lymphatic system, from the first to upper levels. Since axillary node dissection does not improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy might replace complete axillary dissection for staging of the axilla in clinically N0 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy would represent a significant advantage as a minimally invasive procedure, considering that about 70% of patients are found to be free from metastatic disease, yet axillary node dissection can lead to significant morbidity. Subdermal or peritumoural injection of small aliquots (and very low activity) of radiotracer is preferred to intratumoural administration, and (99m)Tc-labelled colloids with most of the particles in the 100-200 nm size range would be ideal for radioguided sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. The success rate of radioguidance in localising the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer surgery is about 97% in institutions where a high number of procedures are performed, and the success rate of lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel node detection is about 100%. The sentinel lymph node should be processed for intraoperative frozen section examination in its entirety, based on conventional histopathology and, when necessary, immune staining with anti-cytokeratin antibody. Nowadays, lymphoscintigraphy is a useful procedure in patients with different clinical evidence of breast cancer.     

Sentinel lymph node identification in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary node dissection on lymph node status in patients with T1-T2 breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with T1 and 12 with T2 breast carcinoma and clinically N0 axillary lymph nodes, underwent lymphoscintigraphy following the administration of 99mTc-human albumin nanocolloids. The tracer was injected subdermally, over the tumor mass, in the 34 patients with palpable lesions and peritumorally (n=3) or intratumorally (n=4), under stereotactic or ultrasound guidance, in the 7 patients with non-palpable lesions. Anterior and lateral planar images were acquired 15 min after the injection of the tracer and repeated every 30 min up to 3 hr until identification of sentinel lymph node. At the end of the scintigraphic study, sentinel node skin projection was marked using a dermographic pen. Eighteen hours after lymphoscintigraphy, sentinel lymph node was identified and removed during surgery by hand-held gamma probe, then, the remaining axillary lymph nodes were dissected. All surgical specimens underwent histologic examination. Sentinel lymph nodes free of metastasis at histology, underwent additional examination with immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratin and EMA to search for micrometastases. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph node was identified in the 34 patients injected subdermally and in the 3 patients injected peritumorally, while it remained undetected in the 4 patients injected intratumorally except for one case in which it was isolated by radioguided surgery but not scintigraphically. Sentinel nodes resulted free of metastases both at histology and immunohistochemistry in 32 cases and metastatic in 6. In the 32 patients with non-metastatic sentinel lymph nodes the other axillary nodes were also free of metastases. Among the 6 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes, in 3 cases they were the only metastatic nodes of the axilla while in the other 3 cases metastases were spread to other axillary nodes. CONCLUSIONS: In agreement with previous studies, our results showed that sentinel lymph node radioguided biopsy is a simple and reliable method for predicting axillary lymph nodes status and for avoiding axillary dissection in early breast cancer patients with sentinel node free of metastases.     

Significance of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and thin-slice computed tomography on sentinel node assessment: metastatic sentinel node in a lateral paramammary lesion out of axillary nodes from breast cancer

Sentinel node status was evaluated using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in a 43-year-old woman who presented with an invasive ductal carcinoma in the lower outer quadrant of the right breast. Two strong hot nodules were visualized in the affected axillary basin on an early image, and a faint accumulation of radioactive tracer was lying between the cancer in the right lower outer quadrant and the axillary hot nodules on the lymphoscintigram taken at 90 min. The faint accumulation was considered to represent a small paramammary node on thin-slice computed tomography (CT) and was confirmed by node biopsy to be a sentinel node grossly involved with tumor cells. Immediate axillary dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy was subsequently performed. Careful evaluation using lymphoscintigraphy and thin-slice CT may be associated with increased localization of true sentinel nodes.     

Factors affecting sentinel node localization during preoperative breast lymphoscintigraphy.

Variable success rates for identifying axillary (AX) sentinel nodes in breast cancer patients using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy have been reported. We evaluated the effects of age, weight, breast size, method of biopsy, interval after biopsy, and imaging view on the success of sentinel node identification and on the kinetics of radiopharmaceutical migration. METHODS: Preoperative breast lymphoscintigraphy was performed in consecutive breast cancer patients from February 1998 to December 1998. The ipsilateral shoulder was elevated on a foam wedge and the arm was abducted and elevated overhead. Imaging using this modified oblique view of the axilla (MOVA) started immediately after peritumoral injection of Millipore-filtered 99mTc-sulfur colloid and continued until AX sentinel nodes were identified. Anterior views were obtained after MOVA. AX, internal mammary (IM), and clavicular (CL) basins were monitored in all patients. MOVA was compared with the anterior view for sentinel node identification. Age, weight, breast size, method of biopsy, interval after biopsy, and primary tumor location were evaluated for their effects on sentinel node localization and transit times from injection to arrival at the sentinel nodes. RESULTS: Seventy-six lymphoscintigrams were obtained for 75 patients. AX sentinel nodes were revealed in 75 (99%) cases. IM or CL sentinel nodes were found in 19 (25%) cases and were not related to tumor location; exclusive IM drainage was present in 1 (1%) case. Identification of AX sentinel nodes was equivalent with MOVA and anterior views in 18 (24%) patients, was better with MOVA in 20 (26%) patients, and was accomplished only with MOVA in 38 (50%) patients. Median transit time was 17.5 min (range, 1 min to 18 h) after injection, and larger breast size was associated with increased transit time. No effect of age, weight, biopsy method, interval from biopsy, or tumor location on transit time was found. CONCLUSION: Use of MOVA can improve identification of AX sentinel nodes. Although AX drainage is the predominant pattern, a tumor in any portion of the breast can drain to IM sentinel nodes. Transit time was influenced by breast size. Overall short arrival times with this technique allow sentinel lymph node dissection to be performed on the same day as lymphoscintigraphy.     

淋巴显像及术中γ探测定位活检乳腺癌前哨淋巴结

目的：探讨淋巴显像及术中γ探测定位活组织检查乳腺癌前硝淋巴结的临床价值。方法：术前在乳腺肿瘤表面正中皮内注射37－74MBq ^99Tcm-大分子右旋糖酐（Dx)，用淋巴显像和术中γ探测定位乳腺癌 前硝淋巴结，术中切除前 淋巴结，而后行腑窝淋巴结清扫术，两标本连同切除的乳腺肿物同时送病理检查，分析和前哨淋巴结转移与腋窝淋巴结的关系。结果：31例均行淋巴显像和术中γ探测定位乳腺癌前哨淋巴结患者中，检出率为100％，有3例前哨淋巴结病理检查呈假阴性，假阴性率为25％，结论：术中γ探测是乳腺癌前哨淋巴结定位最可靠的手段。以乳腺 癌前哨淋巴结活组织检查取代常规腑窝淋巴结清扫术尚需进一步研究。     

Sentinel lymph node mapping for breast cancer: analysis in a diverse patient group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with breast cancer scheduled to undergo axillary nodal dissection underwent scintigraphic localization of sentinel lymph nodes with filtered technetium 99m sulfur colloid. At surgery, isosulfan blue was injected. Sentinel nodes were identifiable by blue color and by radioactivity with hand-held gamma probe. Results were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: A sentinel lymph node was identified in 49 patients (79%). Lymph nodes were positive for metastatic disease in 26 patients (42%). The mapping success rate was 78% (n = 21) in the 27 patients with no prior surgery, 78% (n = 18) in the 23 patients with prior surgery, and 86% (n = 12) in the 14 patients with prior chemotherapy. Axillary nodes were positive in 11 (41%) of the 27 patients with no prior intervention, six (26%) of the 23 patients with prior surgery, and 10 (71%) of the 14 patients with prior chemotherapy. There were no false-negative findings in patients without prior intervention. Four patients with positive nodes had false-negative sentinel nodes. CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy without axillary dissection is appropriate in patients with breast cancer who have not undergone prior intervention. Further study is necessary to ascertain the accuracy of the procedure for patients who have undergone presurgical chemotherapy or previous excisional biopsy.     

Alternative lymphatic pathway after previous axillary node dissection in recurrent/primary breast cancer

OBJECTIVES: The sentinel lymph node approach has almost become the standard procedure of choice in the management of patients with early breast cancer. The status of sentinel nodes, whether or not pathologically involved by cancer cells, represents those of the axillary nodes with a negative predictive value of almost 100%. If the axillary lymphatic nodal drainage is altered, alternative lymphatic pathways and accordingly sentinel node location will be changed. METHODS: In this article, 4 patients are presented, 3 with recurrent breast cancer who had already undergone lumpectomy, axillary node dissection, and radiotherapy in the past and 1 with primary breast cancer after surgical removal of a malignant melanoma on her back and had axillary node dissection on the same side as the breast cancer. These patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy followed by sentinel node localization using the gamma probe and also blue dye injection during surgery. RESULTS: All patients showed alternate lymphatic pathways, 1 had an ipsilateral internal mammary node and crossed lymphatics to a contralateral axillary node, 2 had intramammary sentinel nodes, and 1 had an internal mammary on the same side. Pathologic examination of the intramammary and contralateral sentinel nodes were negative for metastases. Internal mammary sentinel nodes were not biopsied. CONCLUSION: We feel that sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy should be done even in patients who have altered lymphatic pathways resulting from previous axillary node dissection. It allows identifying and biopsy of the sentinel node at its new unpredicted location.     

早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检替代腋窝清扫的临床应用

目的：探讨腋窝前哨淋巴结活检术在早期乳腺癌中替代腋窝淋巴清扫术的意义。方法：选择15例早期（T1-2N0M0）乳腺癌患者,用1%亚甲蓝溶液行腋窝前哨淋巴结活检,淋巴结阴性,不行腋窝清扫。结果：15例患者随访1～3年,术后无一例出现患侧上肢肿胀、患侧上肢感觉麻木、运动障碍等并发症。所有患者未发现有局部复发及腋窝肿大淋巴结。结论：对于早期乳腺癌患者,腋窝前哨淋巴结活检阴性可替代腋窝清扫术。     

Radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery.

The concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery relates to the fact that the tumor drains in a logical way through the lymphatic system, from the first to upper levels. Therefore, the first lymph node met (the sentinel node) will most likely be the first to be affected by metastasis, and a negative sentinel node makes it highly unlikely that other nodes are affected. Because axillary node dissection does not improve prognosis of patients with breast cancer (being important only to stage the axilla), sentinel lymph node biopsy might replace complete axillary dissection to stage the axilla in clinically N0 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy would represent a significant advantage as a minimally invasive procedure, considering that, after surgery, about 70% of patients are found to be free from metastatic disease, yet axillary node dissection can lead to significant morbidity. Furthermore, histologic sampling errors can be reduced if a single (sentinel) node is assessed extensively rather than few histologic sections in a high number of lymph nodes per patient. Although the pattern of lymph drainage from breast cancer can be variable, the mammary gland and the overlying skin can be considered as a biologic unit in which lymphatics tend to follow the vasculature. Therefore, considering that tumor lymphatics are disorganized and relatively ineffective, subdermal and peritumoral injection of small aliquots of radiotracer is preferred to intratumoral administration. (99m)Tc-labeled colloids with most of the particles in the 100- to 200-nm size range would be ideal for radioguided sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Lymphoscintigraphy is an essential part of radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy because images are used to direct the surgeon to the site of the node. The sentinel lymph node should have a significantly higher count than that of background (at least 10:1 intraoperatively). After removal of the sentinel node, the axilla must be reexamined to ensure that all radioactive sites are identified and removed for analysis. The sentinel lymph node should be processed for intraoperative frozen section examination in its entirety, based on conventional histopathology and, when needed, immune staining with anticytokeratin antibody. The success rate of radioguidance in localizing the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer surgery is about 94%--97% in institutions where a high number of procedures are performed and approaches 99% when combined with the vital blue dye technique. At present, there is no definite evidence that negative sentinel lymph node biopsy is invariably correlated with negative axillary status, except perhaps for T1a-b breast cancers, with a size of < or =1 cm. Randomized clinical trials should elucidate the impact of avoiding axillary node dissection on patients with a negative sentinel lymph node on the long-term clinical outcome of patients.     

Sentinel node biopsy in male breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: Male breast cancer is a rare disease and axillary status is the most important prognostic indicator. Lymphoscintigraphy associated with gamma-probe guided surgery has been proved to reliably detect sentinel nodes in female patients with breast cancer. This study evaluates the feasibility of the surgical identification of sentinel node by using lymphoscintigraphy and a gamma-detecting probe in male patients, in order to select subjects who would be suitable for complete axillary lymphadenectomy. METHODS: Colloid human albumin labelled with 99Tc was administered to 18 male patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axillary lymph nodes. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed the day before surgery. An intraoperative gamma-detecting probe was used to identify sentinel nodes during surgery. RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy and biopsy of the sentinel node were successful in all cases. A total of 20 sentinel nodes were removed. Pathological examinations showed 11 infiltrating ductal carcinomas, two intraductal carcinomas and five intracystic papillary carcinomas. Six patients (33%) had positive sentinel node (micrometastases were found in three patients). These patients underwent axillary dissection; in five of them (83%) the sentinel node was the only positive node. Twelve patients (67%) showed negative sentinel nodes; in all of them no further surgical treatments were planned. CONCLUSIONS: As in women, lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy under the guidance of a gamma-detecting probe proved to be an easy method for the detection of sentinel nodes in male breast carcinoma. In male patients with early stage cancer, sentinel node biopsy might represent the standard surgical procedure in order to avoid unnecessary morbidity after surgery, preserving accurate staging of the disease in the axilla.     

Technical aspects of sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A significant morbidity risk is associated with axillary nodal dissections for breast cancer. Many treatment decisions are based on axillary nodal status. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy have been investigated to determine if the histology of the sentinel node reflects the remaining lymph node basin. We describe the technical aspects of sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer. METHODS: Ninety-three patients had lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer. Patients with palpable lesions had 4 concentric injections around the site and lesions requiring localization had injections made through tubing connected to the localizing wire introducer needle. Immediate static images were acquired and the sentinel node was marked for surgery. Marks were reverified using a handheld gamma probe. RESULTS: Lymph nodes were visualized by lymphoscintigraphy in 87% of cases. Time to visualization of lymph nodes ranged from 1-120 min with a mean of 28 min. An average of 1.5 nodes were visualized. The overall success rate for identifying the sentinel node at time of surgery was 85%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that lymphoscintigraphy for breast cancer is a detailed procedure that requires coordination with radiology and surgery teams to ensure proper identification of sentinel lymph nodes.     

Non-visualization of sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer

Histological evaluation of the first draining lymph node (sentinel node) in the axilla of patients with breast cancer has dramatically altered the surgical approach to these patients, with sparing of the axilla if no tumour cells are identified. In a fraction of patients imaged after peri-tumoural injection of the breast, there is no visualization of the sentinel node. We retrospectively analysed the status of patients whose nodes were visualized and of patients whose nodes failed to visualize, to define the variables associated with non-visualization of the sentinel node. Seventy-four breast cancer patients were imaged following peri-tumoural injection of filtered 99Tc(m)-sulfur colloid, immediately and up to 5.5 h post-injection. The scintigraphic data were analysed with reference to the patient's age, histology, grade, site and size of tumour, previous diagnostic procedure and time interval to scan, using univariate analysis and a logistic regression model. A sentinel node was visualized in 53 of 74 women (72%). Comparison of patients with non-visualized versus visualized sentinel nodes disclosed no statistically significant univariate relation to age of the patients (P = 0.10), size of tumour (P = 0.46), site (P = 0.26), histology [invasive ductal carcinoma in 16 of 20 (80%) non-visualized cases, and in 43 of 53 (81%) visualized patients], prior excision biopsy (P = 0.36) and time interval to surgery (P = 0.29). Tumour grade was the only significant variable on univariate analysis (P = 0.03), though multivariate analysis showed that none of the independent parameters were statistically significant. In 39 patients with an upper outer quadrant tumour, the location of the sentinel node was not limited to the axilla and even crossed the midline of the breast. Our results show that none of the independent variables is associated with non-visualization of sentinel lymph node on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy of patients with breast cancer, though the tumour grade may have contributed to non-visualization of this node. The non-axillary drainage from upper outer quadrant tumours suggests the routine use of lymphoscintigraphy prior to axillary dissection.     

Sentinel lymphoscintigraphy in patients with breast cancer undergoing excisional biopsy

Some small tumors of the breast cannot be diagnosed by needle biopsy, and an excisional biopsy is occasionally needed for the diagnosis. Sentinel node navigation surgery is frequently suitable for patients with such small breast cancers. The purpose of this study was to compare sentinel lymphoscintigrams in breast cancer patients who had previously undergone excisional biopsy with sentinel lymphoscintigrams in patients undergoing no excisional biopsy. We also investigated the possibility of clinical application of the sentinel node navigation procedure in the former group of patients. METHODS: Sentinel lymphoscintigrams of 43 patients with breast cancer undergoing excisional biopsy were compared to those of 116 patients without excisional biopsy. Lymphoscintigrams were obtained by using intradermal and/or subdermal injections of technetium-99m labeled phytate at 2 points on each side of the dermal incision in patients after excisional biopsy. Injections were performed at 2 points of the skin over the tumor in the patients who had not undergone excisional biopsy. RESULTS: Axillary lymph nodes were visualized in 42 of 43 patients undergoing excisional biopsy (98%) and in 115 of 116 patients without excisional biopsy (99%). The number of visualized axillary nodes was 1 to 5 (mean +/- SD = 2.1 +/- 1.0) and 1 to 5 (mean +/- SD = 1.9 +/- 1.0) in the two groups, respectively. No significant difference was determined between the two groups. Parasternal lymph nodes were depicted in 3 patients after excisional biopsy who had the tumor in the outer half of the breast, in contrast to 4 without excisional biopsy who had the tumor in the inner half. Intramammary hot spots were observed in 5 patients after excisional biopsy and in 2 without excisional biopsy. Lymphatic vessels were observed in 23 patients (53%) who had the excisional biopsy, and in 37 (32%) who did not have the biopsy. The former figure was significantly higher than the latter (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Sentinel node navigation surgery for axillary nodes was shown to be possible in patients undergoing excisional biopsy. However, the visualization of parasternal nodes, intramammary hot spots and lymphatic vessels tended to increase in number, and care must be exercised in the management of these patients.     

Percutaneous biopsy and sentinel lymphadenectomy: minimally invasive diagnosis and treatment of nonpalpable breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of the combination of percutaneous imaging-guided large-core breast biopsy and sentinel lymphadenectomy in the diagnosis and treatment of nonpalpable invasive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review revealed 200 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers diagnosed by percutaneous imaging-guided large-core biopsy and treated with surgery that included sentinel lymphadenectomy. Percutaneous breast biopsy was performed with stereotactic or sonographic guidance with an automated core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy probe. Sentinel lymphadenectomy was performed with intradermal injection of a radioisotope and intraparenchymal injection of blue contrast agent. Technical success was defined as identification of sentinel nodes at surgery. Medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: Technical success rate was 200 (100%) of 200. In 158 (79%) of 200 cancers, sentinel nodes were tumor-free, and axillary dissection was avoided. In three (2%) of 200 carcinomas, the sentinel nodes were negative for tumor, but nonsentinel nodes suspicious on intraoperative palpation were excised and found by frozen section analysis to contain tumor. Tumor was found in sentinel nodes in 39 (20%) of 200 carcinomas; axillary dissection, performed in 31 of these 39 women, revealed additional tumor in nonsentinel nodes in seven (23%). A single surgical procedure was performed for 164 (82%) of 200 carcinomas; the breast was preserved in 191 (96%) of these 200 carcinomas. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous imaging-guided large-core breast biopsy and sentinel lymphadenectomy provide a minimally invasive approach to the diagnosis and treatment of women with nonpalpable invasive breast cancers.     

Lymphatic drainage patterns on early versus delayed breast lymphoscintigraphy performed after injection of filtered Tc-99m sulfur colloid in breast cancer patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy

The axillary lymph node status is the most important predictor of prognosis and aids in breast cancer treatment planning. Patients with breast cancer now frequently undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy rather than axillary lymph node dissection to determine the status of the regional lymph nodes. However, the optimal timing of radionuclide injection relative to the timing of SLN biopsy remains controversial. The objective of this study was to compare the lymphatic drainage patterns on lymphoscintigraphy performed at 15 minutes to 4 hours and at 18 to 24 hours after injection of filtered Tc-99m sulfur colloid, and to determine whether, over time, radiocolloid migrates to second-echelon nodes that are not the SLNs. Fifteen women with breast cancer (mean age, 55 years; range, 38-78 years) were scheduled to undergo SLN biopsy after each received an injection of 18.5 MBq (0.5 mCi) filtered Tc-99m sulfur colloid into the breast parenchyma surrounding the tumor or biopsy cavity. Both early (15 minutes to 4 hours after radionuclide injection) and delayed (18-24 hours after radionuclide injection) lymphoscintigraphy was performed in each patient. SLN biopsy was performed, followed by completion axillary lymph node dissection and planned breast surgery. In each patient the patterns of distribution of the radionuclide in the lymph nodes were the same on early and delayed lymphoscintigrams. These findings, that the distributions of radionuclide in lymph nodes are identical on early and delayed images obtained after injection of filtered Tc-99m sulfur colloid, suggest that performing SLN biopsy on the day after injection does not diminish the accuracy of the technique in predicting the potential site of metastasis in the regional lymph nodes in patients undergoing this procedure for breast cancer.     

Subareolar injection of technetium-99m nanocolloid yields reliable data on the axillary lymph node tumour status in breast cancer patients with previous manipulations on the primary tumour: a prospective study of 117 patients

According to recently published guidelines, histological clarification by interventional techniques should be undertaken before planning the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma. In patients with previous manipulations on the primary tumour, peritumoural injection in the context of preoperative scintigraphic detection of the sentinel lymph nodes is not possible. The aim of this prospective study was to clarify whether subareolar injection of nanocolloid can yield reliable data on the axillary lymph node tumour status in breast cancer patients with previous manipulations on the primary tumour. To date, 117 women (age 31–80 years) with breast carcinoma have been enrolled. All of these patients had undergone a biopsy (n=88) or surgery on the primary tumour (n=29) and were without clinical suspicion of lymph node metastases. Subareolar injection of 40 MBq technetium-99m nanocolloid was carried out in at least eight deposits around the areolar margin [one deposit in the middle of each quadrant and one deposit at each quadrant intersection (0.05 ml/deposit)]. Immediately after injection, dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy of the axillary, thoracic and cervical areas was performed in various views with a gamma camera (LEAP collimator, 256×256 matrix). Lymphatic drainage was directed exclusively to the ipsilateral axilla. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and elective dissection of axillary lymph nodes were performed in all patients. All lymph nodes removed were examined by histology and immunohistochemistry. In 26 patients, lymph node metastases were found in the sentinel lymph nodes. In six of them, non-sentinel lymph nodes also showed tumour involvement. In the remaining 91 patients, lymph node metastases could be found neither in sentinel lymph nodes nor in non-sentinel lymph nodes. In conclusion, subareolar nanocolloid injection can yield reliable information on the axillary lymph node tumour status in patients with previous manipulations on the primary tumour in the breast.     

Lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer: the value of breast lymphoscintigraphy in breast sentinel node staging

A 28-year-old woman with an infiltrating ductal carcinoma in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast diagnosed by excisional biopsy underwent lumpectomy, intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and sentinel node dissection. This was followed by an immediate completion axillary node dissection using a hand-held gamma probe and isosulfan blue to map the lymphatics. Preoperative breast lymphoscintigraphy showed drainage into the axilla and an apparent area of radiocolloid accumulation in the inferior hemisphere of the left breast. Because our protocol called only for removal of axillary sentinel nodes, the inferior hemisphere radiocolloid accumulation was not removed. The patient did not complete local regional therapy with breast irradiation and developed a mass in the inferior hemisphere of the left breast, which on biopsy was shown to be metastatic breast cancer in an intramammary lymph node. This case illustrates the potential value of breast lymphoscintograms to identify unusual sites of lymphatic drainage that may prove to be clinically relevant.     

Preoperative radionuclide lymphangiography and sentinel node localization with radionuclide techniques. Advantages and ambiguous aspects

Axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic factors for patients with melanoma and early breast cancer. Axillary lymph node dissection is an important part of the surgical treatment of breast cancer. As an alternative to axillary node dissection was proposed the sentinel lymph node detection (SLND). This technique was initially described for detecting occult lymph node metastasis in patients with melanoma and recently is used for breast cancer patients. Nowadays the radioisotopique techniques, including the lymphoscintigraphy and the intraoperative detection of SN, have received attention as a possible alternative to axillary lymph nodes dissection because of the clinical value of SN in malignancies and the development of technical equipment. We review the different techniques of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative detection of SN, including the radioisotopique tracers, timing and site of injection and the clinical value of both methods in patients with early breast cancer.     

Scintigraphic visualization of an epigastric sentinel node in recurrent breast cancer after lumpectomy and postoperative radiation therapy

Sentinel node imaging and biopsy have become standard procedures for staging early breast cancer. Positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy necessitates the need for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Failure to visualize a sentinel lymph node in recurrent breast cancer after treatment by surgery, chemotherapy, and high-dose postoperative radiation therapy is almost the case in every patient. The reason for failure to visualize the sentinel node is the fibrosis that follows high-dose radiotherapy and blocks the lymphatics preventing spread of the tumor cells to the lymph nodes. Alternative pathways for the drainage of lymph from the breast are developed in these patients. We have previously reported on the alternative pathways of lymphatics to the contralateral axilla, supraclavicular area, and also reported on the development of intramammary lymph nodes. In this report, we are presenting another alternative pathway of lymphatics to the region of the epigastrium below the lower end of the sternum.