Platelet reactivity evaluated with the VASP assay following ticagrelor loading dose in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Background

The level of platelet reactivity (PR) inhibition obtained after P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonist loading dose (LD) is associated with the ischemic and bleeding risk following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the level of PR inhibition achieved by a 180 mg LD of ticagrelor and the rate of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in ACS patients undergoing PCI.

Methods

We performed a multicentre prospective observational study enrolling ACS patients undergoing PCI. Patients were included if they were admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction or non ST-elevation ACS. To assess PR, a VASP index was measured at least 6 and within 24 hours following a 180 mg LD of ticagrelor. HTPR was defined as a VASP index ≥ 50%.

Results

One hundred and fifteen patients were included: 31.3% of STEMI, 49.6% of NSTEMI and 19.1% of unstable angina. Following ticagrelor LD the mean VASP index was 17 ± 14%. However the response to ticagrelor was not uniform with a small inter-individual variability: inter quartile range: 7.6–22.8% and a rate of HTPR of 3.5%. A high number of patients, 65.6%, had a VASP index < 16%. None of the baseline characteristics of the study population was associated with PR. In addition, PR was similar in STEMI, NSTEMI and unstable angina (p = 0.9).

Conclusion

In ACS patients the level of PR inhibition achieved by a 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor is not uniform and the rate of HTPR is 3.5%. A high proportion of patients exhibited a VASP index < 16%.     

A randomised study comparing the antiplatelet and antinflammatory effect of clopidogrel 150 mg/day versus 75 mg/day in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction and poor responsiveness to clopidogrel: Results from the DOUBLE study

Introduction

The antiplatelet effect of standard or increased clopidogrel doses in patients with ST- segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) has never been studied. In this study we compared the antiplatelet effect of a 75 mg daily maintenance dose of clopidogrel with 150 mg in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Materials and methods

Fifty-four patients with STEMI undergoing PCI were randomly allocated to receive either 75 mg/day clopidogrel (group 1) or 150 mg/day (group 2) for 1 month. Platelet function, measured by 5 different assays, was determined at 3 time points: 38 ± 8 hours after the procedure, 1 week and 1 month after randomization.

Results

In group 1, mean ± SD platelet reactivity index (PRI) measured with the VASP assay was 57.7 ± 15.7% and 46.9 ± 15.7% at 1 week and 1 month, respectively, compared to 38.8 ± 15.7% and 34.9 ± 12.6% in group 2 (p = 0.0001). Same results were observed for light transmittance aggregometry, whole blood aggregometry and VerifyNow, but not for thromboelastometry. In contrast to what may be expected, the 75 mg daily maintenance dose took longer than 1-week to provide the full clopidogrel antiplatelet effect. Furthermore, patients in group 2 had a nearly 50% reduction in C-reactive protein levels both at 1 week and 1 month.

Conclusion

In patients with STEMI and poor responsiveness to clopidogrel a 150 mg daily maintenance dose of clopidogrel is associated with a significant reduction of platelet aggregation and a trend towards reduced inflammation.     

The effect of clopidogrel besylate and clopidogrel hydrogensulfate on platelet aggregation in patients with coronary artery disease: a retrospective study

Background

Recently several alternative forms of the original clopidogrel hydrogensulfate (CHS) were spread worldwide. A large amount of such drugs turned out to be clopidogrel besylate (CB). Only three studies, involving healthy volunteers, investigated the antiplatelet effect of CB, whereas its attribute remained unexplored in the case of patients with cardiovascular diseases. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the difference between the antiplatelet effects of two clopidogrel formulas, CHS and CB, on patients with coronary artery diseases.

Methods

Data of 150 patients with previous CHS treatment were investigated. According to the documentations, the CHS therapy was shifted to CB. 94 patients of the selected population received dual antiplatelet therapy, clopidogrel and aspirin. The antiplatelet effects of CHS and CB were compared by ADP induced platelet aggregation measurements using light transmission aggregometry.

Results

Irrespective of the therapeutic combinations the performed statistical investigations failed to show significant difference (p = 0.30) between the effect of CB (AGGmax_CB: 27.6 ± 13.7%) or CHS (AGGmax_CHS: 29.0 ± 15.3%) on the ADP induced platelet aggregation. Insignificant deviations were found in both forms of clopidogrel salts, either in the lack (AGGmax_CB : 32.5 ± 14,2%; AGGmax_CHS: 34,0 ± 16,1%; p = 0,29) or in the presence of aspirin (AGGmax_CB: 24.7 ± 12,5%; AGGmax_CHS: 26,0 ± 14,1%; p = 0,31).

Conclusion

Our results indicated that both CB and CHS had an identical inhibitory effect on ADP induced platelet aggregation in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Moreover their efficiency showed no overall significant difference in the case of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin as well. However there might be an inter- and intraindividual variability between the two clopidogrel formulas.     

Impact of the proton pump inhibitors and CYP2C19*2 polymorphism on platelet response to clopidogrel as assessed by four platelet function assays

Background

Previous studies suggested a possible negative interference of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on clopidogrel’s antiplatelet effect because of the competitive inhibition of the CYP 2C19 isoenzyme. Moreover, carriers of the loss-of-function allele of CYP2C19 polymorphism (CYP2C19*2) display significantly lower responses to clopidogrel. In this study, we investigated the association between CYP2C19*2 genotype, PPI intake and clopidogrel resistance in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and their effect on clinical outcome.

Methods

We recruited 95 patients with CAD receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy in combination with aspirin. Platelet reactivity was simultaneously assessed by INNOVANCE PFA-100 P2Y, ADP-induced light transmission aggregometry (LTA), flow-cytometric vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)-phosphorylation assay and multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate). Cardiovascular outcomes were recorded during 1-year follow-up period.

Results

Only platelet reactivity assessed by measuring platelet phosphorylated-VASP demonstrated a significant higher platelet reactivity in carriers of CYP2C19*2 (p = 0.023). The other methods displayed higher - but not statistically significant - platelet reactivity in patients carrying the CYP2C19*2 variant as compared with non-carriers. Patients on PPIs demonstrated almost similar suppression of platelet reactivity in comparison with those not treated with PPIs by all platelet function assays. In logistic regression analysis none of the platelet function assays measurements were related with clinical outcomes. Similarly neither CYP2C19*2 genetic variant nor PPI treatment were associated with adverse clinical events.

Conclusions

PPI co-administration did not influence clopidogrel’s antiplatelet effect on laboratory testing by all platelet function assays used. On the contrary, patients carrying CYP2C19*2 genotype had significantly higher residual platelet reactivity as estimated by VASP-phosphorylation assay.     

Plasma and Whole Blood Clot Strength Measured by Thrombelastography in Patients Treated with Clopidogrel during Acute Coronary Syndromes

Introduction

Treatment with clopidogrel, a selective platelet P₂Y₁₂ receptor antagonist, reduces risk of recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), by limiting platelet aggregation and activation. Stable whole blood clot formation requires activation of platelets, generation of fibrin and final fibrin crosslinks. In this study we intended to compare plasma and whole blood thrombelastography (TEG) measurements in patients during ACS.

Materials and Methods

Whole blood and plasma samples from 32 patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) were collected after administration of clopidogrel. Whole blood and plasma fibrin clot strength (MA) were determined by TEG. Platelet aggregation was determined by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) using adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP), thrombin receptor activation peptide (TRAP), or collagen as agonists. Fibrinogen and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were measured by ELISA.

Results

Heightened plasma fibrin clot strength was associated with increased platelet reactivity stimulated by ADP (ρ = 0.536; p = 0.002), TRAP (ρ = 0.481; p = 0.007), and collagen (ρ = 0.538; p = 0.01). In contrast to plasma fibrin MA, whole blood MA did not correlate with platelet aggregation. Platelet count was the primary contributor to the difference in thrombin induced whole blood MA and plasma fibrin MA. Increasing levels of CRP were associated with increased plasma fibrin clot strength and platelet reactivity.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that inflammation is associated with increased plasma fibrin clot strength and lower platelet inhibition by clopidogrel during ACS. Platelet count is a main contributor to additional contractile force of whole blood TEG as compared to plasma TEG during treatment with clopidogrel.     

Multi-parameter assessment of platelet inhibition and its stability during aspirin and clopidogrel therapy

Introduction

Poor response to antiplatelet drugs is associated with adverse outcomes. We assessed platelet inhibition and its stability and tested correlation and agreement between platelet function assays.

Methods

Peripheral blood from 58 patients on both aspirin and clopidogrel who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was collected at hospital discharge (visit-1) and at 30-90 days (visit-2). Platelet function was measured using light transmission aggregometry (LTA-AA and LTA-ADP), VerifyNow® (Aspirin; ARU and P2Y12; PRU), ex vivo TxB₂, urinary 11dhTxB₂, and VASP (PRI) assays. Data were analyzed as continuous, quartiles and binary. Patients were defined as aspirin poor responder (PR) with ARU ≥ 550, LTA-AA maximum ≥ 20%, TxB₂ ≥ 1 ng/mL or 11dhTxB₂ ≥ 1,500 pg/mg of creatinine and as clopidogrel PR with PRU ≥ 240, PRU ≥ 208, LTA-ADP maximum ≥ 40%, PRI ≥ 50%, or PRI ≥ 66%.

Results

Aspirin PR was 3-33% and clopidogrel PR was 10-35% in visit-1. LTA-AA, 11dhTxB_2, and all clopidogrel-response measures showed correlation and agreement between visit-1 and visit-2. The highest agreement between two visits was revealed by PRU ≥ 240 and PRI ≥ 66% (PRU-κ = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.47, 0.93; PRI-κ = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.42, 0.95, p-values < 0.001). Comparison of platelet function assays in a single visit (visit-1) revealed a poor correlation between LTA-AA and 11dhTxB₂ assays and no agreement among aspirin-response assays. The highest correlation and agreement were obtained between VerifyNow® P2Y12 and VASP assays (rho = 0.7, p-value < 0.001 and PRU ≥ 208-PRI-κ = 0.41-0.42, 95% CI = 0.13, 0.69, p-values < 0.001).

Conclusions

Platelet inhibition is stable during aspirin and clopidogrel treatment. Clopidogrel-response assays correlate and agree with each other better than aspirin-response assays.