Prophylaktische Chirurgie des Mamma- und Ovarialkarzinoms

New insights into the genetic basis of carcinogenesis have been obtained by modern molecular biological techniques. Several susceptibility genes are known. The hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2) and endometrial cancer in the context of the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC), germline mutations in mismatch-repair genes, are the most frequent hereditary cancer syndromes in gynaecology. Mutations in TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome) and PTEN (Cowden's disease), associated with increased risk of breast cancer, are responsible for a smaller portion of familial breast cancer.The risk of inheritance and disease can be identified and defined by investigating family history, risk calculation programs, and genetic testing. Afterwards, options of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention can be formulated. Presently, prophylactic surgery is the only option proven by clinical trials that can reduce the mortality of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.     

Consensus Guidelines on Genetic` Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer from the American Society of Breast Surgeons

Background

The purpose of this consensus guideline is to outline recommendations for genetic testing that medical professionals can use to assess hereditary risk for breast cancer.

Methods

Literature review included large datasets, basic and clinical science publications, and recent updated national guidelines. Genetic testing to assess hereditary risk of cancer is a complex, broad, and dynamic area of medical research. The dominant focus of this guideline is limited in scope to breast cancer.

Results

There is a lack of consensus among experts regarding which genes among many should be tested in different clinical scenarios. There is also variation in the degree of consensus regarding the understanding of risk and appropriate clinical management of mutations in many genes.

Conclusions

Genetic testing should be made available to all patients with a personal history of breast cancer. Recent data are reviewed that support genetic testing being offered to each patient with breast cancer (newly diagnosed or with a personal history). If genetic testing is performed, such testing should include BRCA1/BRCA2 and PALB2, with other genes as appropriate for the clinical scenario and family history. For patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, identification of a mutation may impact local treatment recommendations. Patients who had genetic testing previously may benefit from updated testing. Genetic testing should be made available to patients without a history of breast cancer who meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Finally, variants of uncertain significance are not clinically actionable and these patients should be managed based on their individual risk factors.

     

Hereditäres Mammakarzinom

Ten per cent of all breast cancer cases have a strong hereditary component in which half carry a deleterious mutation in the high penetrance genes BRCA1 or BRCA2. These genes confer a lifetime risk of 60-80% for breast cancer and 20-40% for ovarian cancer. Since the identification of these genes in the mid-1990s, an interdisciplinary approach was established in 12 specialized university-based centres in Germany for identifying high-risk families that enables genetic testing and preventive clinical options. It could be demonstrated that ultrasound, mammography, and breast MRI allow the identification of early breast cancer stages. Prophylactic mastectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy reduce breast and ovarian cancer incidence considerably. New therapeutic and preventive strategies are being validated in ongoing clinical studies. Most recently a new molecular target, a PARP inhibitor, was developed that targets specifically BRCA-deficient tumour cells. Participation in a phase II study for metastatic breast and ovarian cancer is available through the centres. Accompanying scientific studies of over 4,500 DNA samples from BRCA1/2-negative high-risk families are moreover being examined for other predisposing genes.     

Overestimation of hereditary breast cancer risk.

OBJECTIVE: To find out how women with breast or ovarian cancer rate their chances of carrying hereditary factors for these cancers and to determine the extent to which they overestimate their risk. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: BRCA1 and BRCA2 are genes that cause breast and ovarian cancer when they are inherited in families. Testing for disease-associated mutations in these genes is now available commercially. Previous studies have shown that women overestimate their chances of carrying mutations. However, women's perceptions of risk have not been compared to objective estimates or to actual BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing results. METHODS: This study examines estimates of carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among women participating in a randomized trial comparing alternative precounseling educational materials. Estimates were provided by participants in a baseline mailed survey. Estimates given by participants were compared to those given by an expert panel and by a statistical model. Testing was offered free of charge and was done in an academic laboratory using standard techniques. Baseline estimates of participating women were compared to the estimates of the expert panel, to the carrier probability provided by the statistical model, and to actual testing results. RESULTS: Women who have a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer significantly overestimate their risk of carrying hereditary factors for breast and ovarian cancer. Self-estimates exceeded the estimates of experts and a statistical model. One hundred women completed testing, and 21 mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were found. Many test-negative women also overestimated their hereditary risk. Some women with a high carrier probability were negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Overestimation of hereditary factors is common among affected women with a family history of cancer. Pretest education and counseling should reduce these high-risk perceptions. Better estimates of carrier probability will direct more intensive clinical services and research.     

Clinical Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer Syndromes

Over the past 15 years there has been substantial improvement in the understanding of hereditary breast cancer. Germline genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, PTEN and TP53 allows for the identification of individuals at increased risk for breast, ovarian and other cancers. Advances in screening, prevention and treatment have led to improved clinical management which is best defined for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The addition of screening techniques such as breast magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to lead to earlier detection. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy leads to a reduction in the risk of both ovarian cancer and breast cancer and also is associated with an improvement in overall survival. BRCA1/2 mutation status may be applicable to systemic therapy decisions. Preclinical and early clinical research suggests that specific classes of chemotherapy may be more effective in mutation carriers. Finally, PARP inhibitors represent a novel therapeutic strategy that exploits the weaknesses of BRCA1/2-associated malignancies.     

Genetic predisposition to breast cancer: a surgical perspective

BACKGROUND: Molecular alterations in proto-oncogenes, tumour suppressor genes, and genes that function in DNA damage recognition and repair are considered to be hallmarks of a carcinogenic process, including breast carcinogenesis. METHODS: A computer-assisted search of the English literature (Medline database, 1990-1999) was performed, followed by a manual search of the reference list of pertinent articles retrieved. RESULTS: Hereditary breast cancer accounts for 5-10 per cent of all breast cancer cases. About 90 per cent of hereditary breast cancers involve mutation of the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genes. Other cancer-related genes (including myc, c-erbB2, Tsg101 and Mdgi) are involved in breast carcinogenesis, but they do not give rise to familial breast cancer syndromes. Risk estimation is the most important clinical implication. Management options for the high-risk mutation carriers include cancer surveillance and preventive strategies (prophylactic surgery or chemoprevention). CONCLUSION: Despite inadequate knowledge about the genetic predisposition to breast cancer and its clinical implications, the demand for genetic testing is likely to expand rapidly. In addition to risk estimation, cancer surveillance and preventive strategies, gene therapy offers a new and theoretically attractive approach to breast cancer management.     

Genetic Counseling and the Advanced Practice Oncology Nursing Role in a Hereditary Cancer Prevention Clinic: Hereditary Breast Cancer Focus (Part I)

Abstract:  Interest in hereditary breast cancer has increased rapidly among all health care providers as well as the laity. A major problem for health care providers, however, is the time and skill required for gathering family history, interpreting the pedigree, and providing genetic counseling for the high-risk patient so that BRCA testing, when indicated, can be pursued and screening and prevention strategies employed by the patient. The fields of hereditary cancer and molecular biology have developed at a rate that makes it difficult for physicians to keep up with this explosive knowledge. Therefore, "Who is going to take care of all of these crucial matters for patient benefit?" is a germane question. Our experience has confirmed that the advanced practice oncology nurse who is interested in cancer genetics can become skilled at providing this service to the patient and his/her family. This study portrays the role of such an oncology nurse in meeting this important public health challenge, with special attention devoted to the logistics of this role in the rapidly emerging field of hereditary breast cancer.     

Hereditary breast cancer: part II. Management of hereditary breast cancer: implications of molecular genetics and pathology

Abstract:  Management of patients at high risk for hereditary breast cancer (HBC) must critically assess its phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity, particularly evidenced by the varying spectra of cancer sites that are integral to the respective HBC syndromes. Targeted management must consider their biology, pathology, and molecular genetics, all in concert with their respective carcinogenic pathways, as they may differ significantly from one breast cancer syndrome to the next. A striking example of management differences pertains to BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-positive breast cancers wherein those with BRCA1 mutations are frequently estrogen receptor (ER)-negative in contrast to BRCA2 mutations which are more frequently ER-positive; therein, significant differences exist with respect to anti-estrogen therapy which will be more amenable to BRCA2 versus BRCA1 mutation carriers manifesting breast cancer. In turn, tumors that are negative for ER, PR, and Her2-neu, often referred to as "triple negative" tumors, may also harbor a unique basal-like gene expression profile and are characterized by poor prognosis wherein endocrine and/or Her2-neu-targeted therapies are not effective treatment options. A further confounder pertains to the lifetime risk for ovarian cancer, which differs strikingly between BRCA1 mutation carriers, who show a 40–60% lifetime risk, and their BRCA2 counterparts, who carry a lifetime risk of approximately 12–15% for ovarian cancer. It is clear that as we learn more about the biology and the molecular aspects of hereditary forms of breast cancer, it will be compelling for the clinician to integrate this knowledge with pharmacologic, radiologic, and surgical treatment options for these high-risk patients.     

The breast surgeon's role in BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing

Five percent to 10% of all women who develop breast cancer carry a hereditary mutation in the genes BRCA1 or BRCA2. Genetic testing is now clinically available, and the results of such testing can dramatically alter a patient's risks for an ipsilateral or contralateral primary breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Therefore, genetic testing will become integral in tailoring surveillance, chemoprevention, and surgical management plans for patients at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes. Such results will also impact the cancer risks for the patient's nuclear and extended family members. Surgeons will play a pivotal role in eliciting personal and family histories from patients, determining which of those histories is suggestive of a germline mutation, facilitating referrals for genetic counseling and testing, and incorporating the results of genetic testing into the patient's short- and long-term management plans.     

Towards population-based genetic screenings for breast and ovarian cancer: A comprehensive review from economic evaluations to patient perspectives

Genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer following genetic counseling is based on guidelines that take into account particular features of the personal and family history, and clinical criteria conferring a probability of having a BRCA mutation greater than 10% as a threshold for accessing the test. However, besides reducing mortality and social impact, the extension of screening programs also for healthy family members would allow a huge saving of the rising costs associated with these pathologies, supporting the choice of the “Test” strategy versus a “No Test” one. Analyses of different health care systems show that by applying the “Test” strategy on patients and their families, a decrease in breast and ovarian cancer cases is achieved, as well as a substantial decrease in costs of economic resources, including the costs of the clinical management of early detected tumors.In this review, we analyzed the most recent papers published on this topic and we summarized the findings on the economic evaluations related to breast and ovarian cancer population screenings. These results proved and validated that the population-wide testing approach is a more accurate screening and preventive intervention than traditional guidelines based on personal/family history and clinical criteria to reduce breast and ovarian cancer risk.     

The genetic basis of breast cancer and its clinical implications

While it has long been recognized that a proportion of breast cancer cases are the result of an inherited familial predisposition, precise knowledge of the underlying genetic processes has been lacking. Recent advances in molecular biology, however, have shown that hereditary breast cancer may eventuate as a result of mutations on several specific gene loci including BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM gene, PTEN and p53. Several other less frequently occurring predisposition genes such as the androgen receptor gene (AR), the HNPCC genes and the oestrogen receptor gene may also be involved, but to a lesser extent. Overall, approximately 5-10% of all breast cancers are thought to involve one of these inherited predisposition genes, with BRCA1 and BRCA2 being responsible for as much as 90% of this group. Because of the complex nature of genetic testing, mutation analysis is not presently routinely available outside genetic counselling clinics. In this review the current knowledge and role of each predisposition gene is outlined and the management implications of genetic testing for members of breast cancer families for both affected and non-affected members are discussed. The need to provide comprehensive counselling for women with an inherited predisposition to breast cancer has seen the evolution of the familial cancer clinic, involving a multidisciplinary specialist team approach. Familial cancer clinics will provide individuals with information about their risk of developing breast cancer and offer advice regarding further management strategies. It is important that surgeons, who have traditionally played a key role in breast cancer treatment, remain cognizant of these advances in genetic molecular biology, and in so doing continue to remain key participants in the conduct of breast cancer management.     

BRCA mutation genetic testing implications in the United States

BRCA mutation carriers have a very high risk of breast and ovarian cancer by age 70, in the ranges 47%–66% and 40%–57%, respectively. Additionally, women with BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer also have an elevated risk of other or secondary malignancies. Fortunately, the breast and ovarian cancer outcome for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is at least as good as for non-carriers with chemoprevention, prophylactic surgeries and appropriate use of therapies. Therefore, identification of those who might have a mutation is important so that genetic counseling, testing, screening and prevention strategies can be applied in a timely manner. This article reviews the impact of genetic testing in general, timing of genetic testing after diagnosis and prior knowledge of mutation status in BRCA carriers with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Additionally, risk-reducing surgeries including the prophylactic contralateral mastectomy, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and the sensitivity of BRCA-defective breast cancer cell lines to differential chemotherapeutic agents will be discussed.     

Breast cancer in women at high risk: The role of rapid genetic testing for BRCA1 and -2 mutations and the consequences for treatment strategies

Specific clinical questions rise when patients, who are diagnosed with breast cancer, are at risk of carrying a mutation in BRCA1 and -2 gene due to a strong family history or young age at diagnosis. These questions concern topics such as 1. Timing of genetic counseling and testing, 2. Choices to be made for BRCA1 or -2 mutation carriers in local treatment, contralateral treatment, (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy, and 3. The psychological effects of rapid testing. The knowledge of the genetic status might have several advantages for the patient in treatment planning, such as the choice whether or not to undergo mastectomy and/or prophylactic contralateral mastectomy. The increased risk of developing a second breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast in mutation carriers, is only slightly higher after primary cancer treatment, than in the general population. Prophylactic contralateral mastectomy provides a substantial reduction of contralateral breast cancer, although only a small breast cancer specific survival benefit. Patients should be enrolled in clinical trials to investigate (neo)-adjuvant drug regimens, that based on preclinical and early clinical evidence might be targeting the homologous recombination defect, such as platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors. If rapid testing is performed, the patient can make a well-balanced decision. Although rapid genetic counseling and testing might cause some distress, most women reported this approach to be worthwhile. In this review the literature regarding these topics is evaluated. Answers and suggestions, useful in clinical practice are discussed.     

Comparison of clinical features and oncologic outcomes between familial non-hereditary and hereditary breast cancer in Korean female patients

BackgroundThe authors compared the clinical features between familial (non-hereditary) and hereditary breast cancer. And we also analyzed their oncologic outcomes to establish appropriate surveillance protocol for familial (non-hereditary) and hereditary breast cancer.MethodsAmong 232 patients with breast cancer who were performed BRCA gene evaluation, twenty-eight patients were diagnosed as hereditary breast cancer with BRCA gene mutation and one-hundred and seventy-six patients were familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer. The clinical characteristics and oncologic outcomes were compared between two groups.ResultsWhile the incidence of multifocality was higher in familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer group (p < 0.001), the bilaterality was higher in hereditary breast cancer group (p < 0.001). And the rate of pathologic complete remission was also significantly higher in hereditary breast cancer group (p = 0.030). The characteristics of tumor were different between familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer and hereditary breast cancer. The oncologic outcome was better in familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer group than hereditary breast cancer group except death.ConclusionThe clinical characteristics of familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer were different from those of hereditary breast cancer but similar to those of sporadic breast cancer. The prognosis of the familial (non-hereditary) breast cancer was significantly better than hereditary breast cancer.     

Medullary carcinoma of breast with a novel germline mutation 1123T >G in exon 11 of BRCA1

Breast cancer, the most common malignancy in females, has an estimated 5-10% hereditary predisposition. BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor gene and is known to be responsible for breast cancer and breast-ovarian cancers running in families. In breast caner patients, several mutations in BRCA1 have been reported throughout the gene. This report describes identification of a mutation in BRCA1 gene using protein truncation (PTT) assay in a patient with medullary carcinoma of breast who also had a family history of breast cancer. Following DNA sequencing, the mutation was confirmed as substitution of thymine at position 1123 with guanine of exon 11 (1123 T>G). This mutation can be added to the pool of known BRCA1 mutations in Pakistani population, which will help in developing a local screening panel of BRCA1 mutations.     

Preventive mastectomy in patients at breast cancer risk due to genetic alterations in the<Emphasis Type="Italic"> BRCA1</Emphasis> and<Emphasis Type="Italic"> BRCA2</Emphasis> gene

BACKGROUND: The availability of genetic testing for inherited mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene provides potentially valuable information to women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer. METHODS AND FOCUS: We review the literature on the value of prophylactic surgical strategies in patients with hereditary predisposition to develop breast cancer and discuss the surgical options available in high-risk cancer patients, decision analyses, and possible complications. RESULTS: Preventive surgical interventions to reduce cancer risk in high-risk patients are often strongly recommended. A patient's life-time risk to develop breast cancer in the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is 50-90%. Despite the reduction in the risk of developing breast cancer, prophylactic mastectomy often leads to significant physical and psychological sequelae.     

Medical Management of newly diagnosed breast cancer in a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier

Germline BRCA1/2 mutations may be infrequent in unselected breast cancer population but are concentrated in those with triple‐negative breast cancer or high‐risk family history. Insight into the biology of BRCA mutation is now allowing a targeted therapeutic approach to these carriers with breast cancer. Functional BRCA genes play a critical role in DNA damage repair. Agents such as platinum salts and poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors exploit this vulnerability of impaired DNA damage repair mechanism in BRCA mutant cancers to leverage therapeutic benefit. Research has demonstrated improved response rates to platinum salts in BRCA‐mutated compared with non‐BRCA‐mutated breast cancer, particularly in the metastatic setting. Additionally, clinical trials of single‐agent PARP inhibitors have shown encouraging response rates and progression‐free survival in patients with BRCA1/2‐mutated breast cancer. In this review, we summarize the medical management of BRCA‐associated breast cancer.     

Identification of twenty-nine novel germline unclassified variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 1400 Italian individuals

ObjectivesBreast and/or ovarian cancers are complex multifactorial diseases caused by interaction of both genetic and non-genetic factors and characterized by predisposition to inheritance. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the most clinically involved with these kinds of cancer and the spectrum of variants affecting these genes is very wide. In fact, point variants, large or small insertions/deletions, genomic rearrangements can be found in these patients, although a large number of variants with uncertain biological and clinical significance continues to be identified. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology is actually the most powerful tool for the discovering of causative mutations and novel disease genes, moreover it allows to make a rapid diagnosis of genetic variants giving fast, inexpensive and detailed genetic information.Material and methodsIn this study, we report the screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes on 1400 consecutive Caucasian patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer history or family risk, attending the oncogenetic ambulatory at the Foundation Policlinico Agostino Gemelli in Rome.ResultsWe describe twenty-nine novel BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants detected in Italian individuals suffering from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC).ConclusionData regarding novel variants can provide useful information not only at epidemiological but also at clinical level, allowing for the better managing of breast and ovarian cancer patients and their family members.     

Testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the southeastern United States

OBJECTIVES: To detail characterization of mutations and uncharacterized variants in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, as observed in a population of breast cancer patients from the southeastern United States, and to examine baseline characteristics of women referred for counseling and testing and provide a preliminary look at how counseling and testing affected intentions toward prophylactic surgery. BACKGROUND: Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes give rise to a dramatically increased risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer or both. There are many reports about special populations in which deleterious mutations are present at a high frequency. It is useful to study these genes in more heterogeneous populations, reflecting different geographic regions. Interest in preventive surgery for gene carriers is high in women and their surgeons. METHODS: Women were recruited through a prospective clinical trial of counseling and free genetic testing. BRCA1 and BRCA2 were screened for mutations using standard techniques, and results were given to participants. Baseline questionnaires determined interest in preventive surgery at the beginning of the study. Follow-up questionnaires for those who completed testing surveyed interest in prophylactic surgery after counseling and receiving test results. RESULTS: Of 213 women who completed counseling and testing, 44 (20.6%) had 29 separate mutations; there were 11 Jewish women carrying three founder mutations. Twenty-eight women (13.1%) had uncharacterized variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2; nine were not previously reported. Women overestimated their chances of possessing a deleterious gene mutation compared to a statistical estimate of carrier risk. A number of women changed their intentions toward preventive surgery after genetic counseling and testing. CONCLUSIONS: Hereditary breast cancer due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was a heterogeneous syndrome in the southeastern United States. Most mutations were seen just once, and uncharacterized variants were common and of uncertain clinical significance. In general, positive test results tended to reinforce intentions toward prophylactic surgery. In contrast, women not interested in surgery at the time of entry tended to remain reluctant after testing and counseling.