Clinical phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin in metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: Paclitaxel as single agent has shown marked activity in several malignancies. The aim of the present phase II trial was to determine the activity of paclitaxel/cisplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Patients and methods: 200 mg/m² paclitaxel was administered over three hours followed by cisplatin (100 mg/m²), repeated every 22 days. Twenty-eight patients were entered and received a total of 99 cycles (median 2, range 1–6). All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 25 for response.Results: Hematologic toxicities included leukopenia CTC grade 3 in 13 patients, and grade 4 in five patients, neutropenia grade 3 in nine patients, and grade 4 in eigth patients, grade 3 anemia and grade 2 thrombocytopenia in one patient each. Non-hematologic toxicities included hypotension grade 2 (six patients), grade 3 (four patients), and grade 4 (two patients). A decline in renal function was observed in 15 courses and 10 patients, leading to a median delay of 2.5 days. Neurosensory and neuromotor toxicity grade 1 were observed in 13 patients (grade 2: 12 patients; grade 3: one patient), myalgia grade 3 in one patient, asthenia grade 3 in two and grade 4 in one patient. Partial responses were observed in 12 patients for an overall response rate of 48% (95% CI: 28%–68%) with a median response duration of 6.5 months (range 1-10 months). Stable disease was observed in seven patients, of who two also had clinical benefit.Conclusions: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m² administered over three hours combined with cisplatin 100 mg/m² is an active regimen warranting further evaluation.     

A phase 2 study of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine every 2 weeks for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer

BACKGROUND:

Preclinical studies suggest that additive or synergistic effects are achieved with the combination of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine. A phase 1 study of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine given every 2 weeks demonstrated encouraging preliminary efficacy against head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC).

METHODS:

This was an open‐label, single‐institution, single‐arm, phase 2 study for patients who had received no more than 2 cytotoxic regimens for recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC. All patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m² intravenously plus gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² intravenously every 2 weeks with vitamin B12 and folate support. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST); secondary endpoints were to estimate overall survival and to evaluate safety and tolerability.

RESULTS:

Twenty‐five patients received therapy. All patients had received prior radiotherapy, and half had received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Neutropenia (grade ≥3) occurred in 24% of patients. Four patients (16%) had a partial response (PR) according to RECIST, and 5 additional patients (20%) had objective tumor reductions of >20 but <30% did not meet RECIST criteria for a PR. The median overall survival for all treated patients was 8.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS:

Treatment with pemetrexed plus gemcitabine every 2 weeks with vitamin support generally was well tolerated. The results of this study provided further evidence that pemetrexed may have significant palliative activity against advanced HNSCC. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Docetaxel and cisplatin: An active regimen in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: Docetaxel and cisplatin are among the most active antitumor agents in head and neck cancer, and phase I studies found the combination of the two drugs to be feasible. The EORTC ECSG performed a multicenter phase II study in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck to evaluate the antitumor efficacy and toxicity of this combination.Patients and methods: Eligibility criteria included written informed consent, a WHO performance status <2, life expectancy of >12 weeks, and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Neoadjuvant pretreatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy or prior radiotherapy were allowed. Patients were ineligible if pretreated with taxoids, had CNS involvement, concurrent malignancy, peripheral neuropathy, or no measurable disease. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (one-hour i.v. infusion), followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (three-hour i.v. infusion), repeated every three weeks. Supportive care included hydration, 5HT3- antagonists, and corticosteroids.Results: Forty-four patients (median age 55 years, range 35–76) entered the trial; 41 patients were eligible, 164 cycles of treatment were evaluable for toxicity, and 31 patients for response. Fourteen patients had undergone prior surgery, 15 had received radiotherapy, and five had had chemotherapy. A median number of four treatment cycles (range 1–6) was given. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were common, but hypersensitivity reactions and fluid retention were very infrequent due to corticosteroid prophylaxis. Four patients were taken off the study due to toxicity, and one toxic death occurred due to pneumonia. Among 41 eligible patients, objective responses as confirmed by independent review included six complete remissions and 16 partial remissions, resulting in an overall response rate of 53.7% (95% confidence interval: 37.4%–69.3%). Responses occurred in locally advanced, recurrent and metastatic disease, both in pre- and non-pretreated patients. Of 22 evaluable, non-pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease, five achieved complete responses, and 14 partial responses. Observed among nine evaluable pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer were one complete response and two partial responses.Conclusion: The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin is feasible and active in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.     

Docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced unresectable head and neck cancer: a phase I-II feasibility study.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety profile and activity of the combination of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in chemotherapy-naive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced unresectable SCCHN were treated with docetaxel and cisplatin both as a 1-h infusion on day 1 followed by a continuous infusion of 5-FU for 5 days. Cycles were planned every 3 weeks up to four cycles, whereafter the patients were treated with locoregional radiotherapy. Two dose levels were studied. Doses in level I were 75 mg/m(2) of docetaxel, 75 mg/m(2) of cisplatin and 750 mg/m(2)/day of 5-FU; in level II the cisplatin dose was escalated to 100 mg/m(2). Following chemotherapy, all patients were to receive curative radiotherapy according to the standards in the different institutions. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were treated at dose level I with 86 cycles (median four; range one to four), and 23 at dose level II with 84 cycles (median four; range two to four). The median relative dose intensity was 0.99 (range 0.86-1.04) at level I and 0.94 (range 0.79-1.02) at level II. The response rate in the intention-to-treat population was 64% [95% confidence interval (CI) 42.5% to 82%] in level I and 78.3% (95% CI 56.3% to 92.5%) in level II; all were partial responses. The maximum tolerated dose was reached at level II with renal toxicity, nausea, stomatitis and thrombocytopenia as principal dose-limiting toxicities. The median survival of the 48 patients was 18.5 months. The survival at 12, 18, 24 and 30 months was 69, 54, 41 and 31%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU associated with prophylactic ciprofloxacin is feasible and active in patients with SCCHN. Dose level I is recommended for phase III testing.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the association of capecitabine-cisplatin in head and neck cancer patients.

The combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered to be the standard treatment in induction chemotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Capecitabine (Xeloda) is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is preferentially activated at the tumoral level, exploiting the higher thymidine phosphorylase activity in tumoral tissue. This phase I trial was conducted in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic head and neck carcinoma. The treatment plan included cisplatin on day 1 every 21 days, followed by capecitabine twice daily from day 2 to day 15, with a 1-week rest period. Pharmacokinetic investigations concerned plasma measurement of unchanged capecitabine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-doxifluridine and 5-FU using an optimized high performance liquid chromatography method, and cisplatin measurement in plasma using a limited sampling procedure. Twenty-one patients were included (mean age 61 years, range 46-76 years). Dose (mg/m(2)) increments for cisplatin and capecitabine (b.i.d.), respectively, were as follows: level 1, 80 and 1000 (three patients); level 2, 100 and 1000 (12 patients); and level 3, 100 and 1125 (five patients). Dose-limiting toxicities occurring during the first cycle (grade >/= 3) were observed on level 2 (one patient with diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, hand-foot syndrome, one toxic death due to renal failure and neutropenia, one patient with neutropenia) and on level 3 (one patient with diarrhea, one patient with hand-foot syndrome and one patient with neutrothrombocytopenia). Due to delayed side-effects, 14 patients (67%) had repeated cycles every 28 days instead of 21 days as initially planned. Objective response was obtained in seven patients (three complete responses and four partial responses). There was no evidence of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships with the drugs and metabolites investigated. Combination of capecitabine and cisplatin is feasible, with a very promising response rate. The recommended doses for further phase II studies are those of level 2 with cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14, every 28 days.     

A phase III placebo-controlled study in advanced head and neck cancer using intratumoural cisplatin/epinephrine gel

Patients with recurrent or refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma received cisplatin/epinephrine injectable gel or placebo gel injected directly into the clinically dominant tumour. The double-blind phase III trial comprised of up to 6 weekly treatments over 8 weeks, 4 weekly evaluation visits, and then monthly follow-up; open-label dosing began as needed after three blinded treatments. Tumour response was defined as complete (100% regression) or partial (50-99% regression) sustained for > or =28 day, and patient benefit as attainment of palliative or preventive goals prospectively selected by investigators and patients. With cisplatin/epinephrine gel, 25% (14 out of 57) of tumours responded (16% complete regression, 9% partial regression), vs 3% (one out of 35, complete regression) with placebo (P=0.007). Patient benefit was positively associated with target tumour response in the blinded period among cisplatin/epinephrine gel recipients (P=0.024): 43% (six out of 14) of responders benefited, vs 12% (five out of 43) of non-responders. The most frequent adverse event was pain during injection and the next most frequent was local cytotoxic effects consistent with the gel's mode of action. Systemic adverse events typical of intravenous cisplatin were uncommon. Intratumoural therapy with cisplatin/epinephrine gel provided safe, well-tolerated, effective palliative treatment for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, who lack other satisfactory treatment options.     

A phase Ia/Ib study of novel anti-ErbB3 monoclonal antibody,barecetamab (ISU104) in refractory solid cancers and monotherapy or in combination with cetuximab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

We evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of barecetamab monotherapy and combination cetuximab therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, especially head and neck cancer (HNC). Part 1 was a 3 + 3 dose-escalation study in which 15 patients received barecetamab at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 28 and weekly in patients with advanced solid cancer. Part 2 was a dose-expansion study including two patient groups with advanced HNC, including six patients receiving barecetamab at 20 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks and 12 patients receiving barecetamab and cetuximab (400 mg/m² on day 1 followed by 250 mg/m² every week). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Maximum serum target engagement was reached with trough levels of doses ≥3 mg/kg IV weekly. Common adverse drug reactions were diarrhea, stomatitis, dermatitis acneiform and decreased appetite. One durable complete response of more than 17 months was observed, and the overall response and disease control rates were 36.4% (4/11) and 81.1% (9/11), respectively, in the combination therapy group. In conclusion, DLT was not observed in barecetamab at 1 to 20 mg/kg. The recommended phase II dose was determined to be 20 mg/kg triweekly. Barecetamab and in cetuximab combination was well tolerated and demonstrated meaningful antitumor effects.     

An EORTC-ECSG phase II study of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: Vinorelbine is an active drug in the treatment of lung and breast cancers and has a favorable toxicity profile. Many clinical trials have demonstrated its antitumor activity in other tumor types including squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We investigated the efficacy and tolerability of vinorelbine in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, previously untreated by chemotherapy.Patients and methods: Seventy-one patients with locoregional recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN were treated with vinorelbine at a dose of 30 mg/m2/week i.v. by short-duration infusion on an out-patient basis. Doses were adjusted according to tolerance.Results: Two complete and seven partial responses were observed among 56 evaluable patients, yielding a response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8%–28%). The overall response rate of all eligible patients (63) was 14%. The responses were seen in recurrent tumors, lymph nodes and in lung metastases, and their median duration was 19 weeks (12–63). The main toxicity, severe and reversible neutropenia (grade 3–4) occurred in 53% of the 69 evaluable (for toxicity) patients. Twelve patients developed severe bronchopulmonary infections, which caused two early deaths. Constipation was observed in 31 patients (45%). Other gastrointestinal toxicities, asthenia, acute pain syndrome and peripheral sensory neuropathy, were mild to moderate. The median number of treatments was seven cycles and the median relative dose intensity of vinorelbine was 85% (25.5 mg/m2/week).Conclusions: Vinorelbine is an active drug, with acceptable toxicity, in recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN, at the dose and schedule administered in the present study. Further evaluation in association with other agents and/or radiotherapy is warranted.     

Randomized study of a short course of weekly cisplatin with or without amifostine in advanced head and neck cancer

Background: Cisplatin is one of the most active cytotoxic agents available for the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer. In a previous phase II study with weekly administration of cisplatin, a response rate of 51% was achieved. However, only in a minority of the patients the planned high dose intensity of 80 mg/m²/week could be reached because of toxicity, mainly thrombocytopenia and ototoxicity. Amifostine is a cytoprotective drug that can diminish the toxicity of alkylating agents and platinum compounds. Therefore the effect of amifostine on toxicity and activity of weekly cisplatin was investigated in a randomized study.Patients and methods: Patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer were eligible. Patients were randomized to weekly cisplatin 70 mg/m² for six cycles preceded by amifostine 740 mg/m², or cisplatin only. Cisplatin was administered in hypertonic saline (3% NaCl) as a one-hour infusion; amifostine was administered as a 15-minute infusion directly before the administration of cisplatin.Results: Seventy-four patients were entered in the study. The median number of cisplatin administrations was 6 (range 2–6), equal in both arms. In both treatment arms the median dose intensity of cisplatin achieved was the planned 70 mg/m²/week. In the cisplatin only arm 6 out of 206 cycles were complicated by thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 versus 1 of 184 cycles in the amifostine arm (P = 0.035). Hypomagnesaemia grade 2 + 3 was significantly less observed in the amifostine arm (P = 0.04). Neurotoxicity analyzed by serial vibration perception thresholds (VPT) showed a diminished incidence of subclinical neurotoxicity in the amifostine arm (P = 0.03). No protective effect on renal and ototoxicity could be shown. Hypotension was the main side effect of amifostine but only of relevance in one patient. The antitumor activity of cisplatin was preserved as 63% of the evaluable patients in the amifostine arm responded compared to 50% of the evaluable patients in the cisplatin alone arm.Conclusion: Our study indicated that in combination with weekly administered cisplatin amifostine reduced the risk of thrombocytopenia, hypomagnesemia as well as subclinical neurotoxicity, but did not result in a higher dose intensity of cisplatin. Addition of amifostine did not compromise the antitumor effect of cisplatin.     

Biweekly paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced head and neck carcinoma

Background: Cisplatin is an active drug in head and neck cancer. Paclitaxel seems a promising drug. This article reports a phase II assessment of the combination of the two.Patients and methods: Twenty-three patients were treated with paclitaxel 90 mg/m² over three hours plus cisplatin 60 mg/m² every other week. Sixteen patients had locoregional disease and seven had metastatic disease. None of the patients had previously been treated with chemotherapy. Nine patients had had radiotherapy to the target lesions.Results: One patient was not evaluable for response. Partial responses were observed in 32% of evaluable patients. Toxicity included asthenia (56%), neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, anemia and vomiting.Conclusions: The overall response rate observed in this study does not seem to justify the use of this chemotherapy regimen in the palliative setting.     

Efficacy of intra-arterial infusion therapy using a combination of cisplatin and docetaxel for recurrent head and neck cancers compared with cisplatin alone

Aims: To compare the initial effect and toxicity, response duration and survival time of intra-arterial infusion therapy using a combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and docetaxel (DXT) with those using CDDP alone for treatment of recurrent head and neck cancers.Materials and methods: Twenty-nine patients with recurrent head and neck cancers were treated using intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy. The chemotherapeutic regimens consisted of CDDP alone (n=12) or a combination of CDDP and DTX (n=17). In the CDDP-DTX group, both CDDP 70 mg/m²and DTX 60 mg/m²were administrated via the external carotid artery (ECA) or via branches of the ECA or subclavian artery. In the CDDP-alone group, CDDP 70 mg/m²was infused. The tumour response (response rate = complete response + partial response) and toxicities (World Health Organization [WHO] classification grades 3 and 4) were evaluated in both groups and compared by Fisher's exact probability test.Results: The response rates in the CDDP-DTX group and the CDDP-alone group were 71% (12/17) and 50% (6/12), respectively (P=0.44). Leucocytopenia and neutropenia (grades 3 and 4) were significantly more prevalent in the former than in the latter group (11/17 vs 1/12; 10/17 vs 1/12) (P<0.01). However, there were no infectious diseases in any of the patients.Conclusion: Combined cisplatin-docetaxel intra-arterial infusion therapy was shown to be effective and safe for recurrent head and neck cancers.     

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

This study was designed to evaluate the activity, safety and tolerance of docetaxel (D) in a selected population with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Twenty-four patients with no prior palliative therapy were enrolled and received D 100 mg m(-2) by 1 h of infusion, every 3 weeks. All but two patients had been evaluated for efficacy on lung metastatic sites. No prophylactic administration of anti-emetics or growth factors was given. A pharmacokinetic study was performed in 22 patients. Twenty-one patients were assessable for response and 24 for toxicity. One hundred and four cycles were administered with a median of 4.5 (range 1-9) per patient. The median cumulative dose was 449 mg m(-2). Partial responses were achieved in five patients with a median duration of 18.7 weeks (range 13.1-50.3). The overall response rate was 20.8% with a median duration of 11.0 weeks (range 2.4-52.6). The most frequent side-effect was neutropenia (79.2% grade IV) but with a short duration (median 4 days) and no febrile neutropenia. The incidence of moderate/severe fluid retention was 29.2% with one treatment discontinuation. Other toxicities (all grades) were common (skin 75%, asthenia 50%, infection 29.2%, nausea 16.7%, diarrhoea 12.5%, stomatitis 16.7%, vomiting 8.3% and HSR 8.3%). A mean clearance of 19.6 l h(-1) m(-2) and an area under the curve of 6.00 microg ml(-1) h(-1) was found in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Docetaxel is active in this selected population with metastatic SCCHN, with a good tolerance.     

Parenteral hyperalimentation in surgical patients with head and neck cancer: A randomized study

Sixty-nine patients were entered in a randomized study to determine the usefulness and practicality of parenteral hyperalimentation (TPN) in preparing and supporting patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radical resections. The patients were stratified by nutritional status and prognosis and randomization were done within each strata to TPN or control. Minimum full TPN was given at 35 calories/kgm/day for at least 14 days postoperatively. Eight patients received preoperative TPN also. Control patients received customary enteral alimentation by feeding tubes. Under the conditions of this particular study, the administration schedules, and type of solutions used, we were unable to demonstrate any superiority of TPN over conventional enteral nutrition in terms of immune parameters, wound healing, complications, and survival.     

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with recurrent or disseminated squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background:Results with docetaxel as single drug in squamous-cellhead and neck cancer have been encouraging. The purpose of the present phaseII study is to evaluate the antitumour efficacy and toxicity of thecombination of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with recurrent ordisseminated squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) for whom nocurative therapy is available. Patients and methods:Eligibility criteria included: writteninformed consent; WHO performance status 2; age 18–70 years;adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function; measurable or evaluabledisease; no previous systemic chemotherapy (prior radiotherapy and/or surgerywere allowed); no other previous or concurrent malignancy; no peripheralneuropathy. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 75 mg/m² in a one-hourinfusion after pre-treatment with prednisolone, followed by cisplatin 75mg/m² in a half-hour infusion preceded and followed by hydration.Treatment was repeated every three weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. Results:Twenty-five patients (median age 52 years, range33–66) entered the trial, all were evaluable for survival, twenty-fourfor response and toxicity. Twenty-four patients had undergone priorradiotherapy and seventeen had also had surgery. Nineteen had local-regionalrecurrence only, three had local-regional disease and distant metastases, andthree had distant metastases only. Patients received a median of 5 treatmentcycles (range 2–8). Overall response rate was 33% (8 of 24) ofpatients; complete response rate was 8% (2 of 24) of patients, lasting2.2 and 17.1 months, respectively; partial response rate was 25% (6 of24) of patients, lasting for a median of 4.9 months (range 1.7–11.6months). Median survival was 11 months. Toxicity was relatively welltolerated. However, one patient died of probable toxicity (neutropenia andinfection) and three patients discontinued treatment because of toxicity(massive oedema, myocardial infarction, persistent thrombocytopenia). The mostfrequent moderate-to-severe toxicity (75% of patients) was grade3–4 neutropenia, transient in all but one patient. Grade 3 neuropathyoccurred in one patient, none had grade 4. Grade 3 oral mucositis occurred inthree patients, none had grade 4. Grade 2–3 hypomagnesaemia occurred in10 patients requiring magnesium infusion. Conclusions:Docetaxel and cisplatin is an active combination inpatients with recurrent or disseminated SCCHN. Remissions are however fairlyshort. Toxicity is significant, but generally manageable.     

Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: To evaluate the toxicity profile and efficacy of cisplatin combined with gemcitabine in patients with irresectable locally recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Patients and methods: Gemcitabine was given at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, plus cisplatin at a dose of 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; every four weeks.Results: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 59 years (range 42–74) were included. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 22 patients were assessable for response. Eleven cases had advanced recurrent locoregional disease while 13 patients had metastatic disease. One CR (4.7%) and four PR (18%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 22.7% (95% CI: 8%–42%). The main toxicity was hematological: neutropenia grade 3–4 in 28% of the cycles and thrombocytopenia grade 3–4 in 16%. The most significant non-hematological toxicity was asthenia grade 2–3 in 24% of the cycles.Conclusions: This cisplatin plus gemcitabine combination schedule has a favourable toxicity profile with a discrete activity in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.