重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关性血流感染病原菌及相关因素分析

目的探讨医院重症监护病房(ICU)中心静脉导管导管相关性血流感染(CRBSI)的病原菌分布特点及其耐药情况,并分析CRBSI的相关因素。方法对医院各科ICU 2008年1~12月所有放置中心静脉导管进行回顾性分析。结果109例患者总置管日2456 d,共送检165份中心导管尖端和283份血培养标本,导管53例阳性,阳性率为32.1%,与导管尖端培养出同一种细菌的血培养14例,导管尖端细菌定植率为21.6‰,感染率为5.7‰;引起CRBSI病原菌主要是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(28.6%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(21.4%)和白色假丝酵母菌(21.4%)。结论研究显示,引起CRBSI的菌株耐药率非常高,应加强导管管理的全程监控。     

Techniques to prevent central venous catheter infections: products, research, and recommendations.

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used to deliver a variety of therapies such as chemotherapy and parenteral nutrition. It is well known that there are complications associated with CVCs; a major complication is catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). Many strategies exist to prevent CVC complications and CRBSI. This paper will focus on the fight against CRBSI using 3 products at the catheter insertion site: 2% chlorhexidine, BioPatch, and transparent split dressings. Lists of key recommendations from national organizations for infection prevention are included.     

Central venous catheter thrombosis associated with 70% ethanol locks in pediatric intestinal failure patients on home parenteral nutrition: a case series

Central venous catheter (CVC) ethanol locks may reduce catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). Four children with intestinal failure on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) were selected for 70% ethanol locks because of their high rate of CRBSI. The 70% ethanol locks were instilled at a volume equal to the estimated internal volume of the CVC. Two children (aged 4 and 11 years) received 70% ethanol locks as CRBSI prophylaxis; another 2 children (aged 10 and 11 years) received 70% ethanol locks as adjunctive treatment for CRBSI. All 4 children developed either visible thrombosis in the CVC or CVC occlusion. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of CVC thrombosis associated with ethanol lock therapy in the pediatric HPN population. Although none of the CVCs were removed due to occlusion, these events raise serious concerns about the use of high-concentration ethanol locks.     

Scheduled replacement of central venous catheters is not necessary.

Although half of intensivists routinely replace their central venous catheters (CVCs), this practice is not supported by data from randomized control studies or by pathophysiology of CVC infection. The daily risk of CVC infection is considered to be a constant; the risk of catheter infection is directly related to the duration of catheter insertion. Consequently, the routine change of the catheter is able to decrease the number of infections per catheter but not to modify the number of infections per day of catheter insertion. This assertion is supported by evidence-based medicine: scheduled replacement every 3 or 7 days has not been shown to alter the infectious risks of CVCs in randomized studies or a meta-analysis. Moreover, routine replacement at a new site exposes the patient to an increased risk of mechanical complications. The overall rate of mechanical complications per catheter inserted is approximately 3%. Guidewire exchange of the catheters may reduce the risk of mechanical complications, but unfortunately is associated with a higher rate of catheter colonization and catheter-related bacteremia. Routine replacement of CVCs is not necessary.     

Anti-infective-treated central venous catheters for total parenteral nutrition or chemotherapy: a systematic review

This systematic review assesses the effect of anti-infective-treated central venous catheters (CVCs) on catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in patients who received a CVC for total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or chemotherapy. Randomised controlled trials were retrieved from Medline and the Cochrane Library up to 14 October 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Data for CRBSI were combined where appropriate, using a random effects model, and subgroup meta-analysis was carried out where applicable. The impact of the risk for CRBSI in the control group on the effect of anti-infective CVCs was studied by using meta-regression based on the bivariate meta-analysis model. Nine trials were included in the review. One trial showed that antibiotic-treated CVCs reduced the risk for CRBSI in outpatients with chemotherapy and a CVC in-situ during a period of about nine weeks. Eight trials did not find an overall significant benefit in favour of antiseptic-treated CVCs in patients who had a CVC during a mean of about two weeks. No relationship could be established between the effect of anti-infective-treated CVCs and the underlying risk for CRBSI, although nearly all trials had serious methodological shortcomings. Thus, available scientific evidence to prevent CRBSI by the use of anti-infective-treated CVCs in patients receiving chemotherapy or TPN is not sufficient as a basis to recommend their use. The recommendation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to use antibiotic- or antiseptic-impregnated CVCs, when the risk for CRBSI remains high despite good hygienic practice, should therefore be limited to patients in the intensive care/perioperative setting.     

Routine changing of intravenous administration sets does not reduce colonization or infection in central venous catheters.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of routine intravenous (IV) administration set changes on central venous catheter (CVC) colonization and catheter-related bacteremia. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Eighteen-bed intensive care unit (ICU) in a large metropolitan hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-one patients with 404 chlorhexidine gluconate and silver sulfadiazine-coated multi-lumen CVCs. INTERVENTIONS: CVCs inserted in the ICU and in situ on day 4 were randomized to have their IV administration sets changed on day 4 (n = 203) or not at all (n = 201). Use of fluid containers and blood product administration sets was limited to 24 hours. CVCs were removed when not required, infection was suspected, or in place on day 7. Catheter cultures were performed on removal by blinded laboratory staff. Catheter-related bacteremia was diagnosed by a blinded intensivist using strict definitions. Data were collected regarding catheter duration, site, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, patient age, diagnosis, hyperglycemia, hypoalbuminemia, immune status, number of fluid containers and IV injections, and administration of propofol, blood, total parenteral nutrition, or lipid infusion. RESULTS: There were 10 colonized CVCs in the group receiving a set change and 19 in the group not receiving one. This difference was not statistically significant on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. There were 3 cases of catheter-related bacteremia per group. Logistic regression found that burns diagnosis and increased ICU stay significantly predicted colonization. CONCLUSION: IV administration sets can be used for 7 days in patients with short-term, antiseptic-coated CVCs.     

The clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial central venous catheter-related infection: are antimicrobial catheters useful?

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for many hospitalized patients, but they are associated with important infectious complications. Recent studies have indicated that CVCs coated with antimicrobial agents reduce the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR BSI). To estimate the clinical and economic consequences of short-term central venous catheter-related infection and the potential usefulness of antimicrobial-coated catheters, we reviewed and synthesized the available relevant literature. Statistical pooling was used to estimate the incidence of both catheter colonization and CR BSI. The attributable mortality of CR BSI was also evaluated. In addition, the economic consequences of both local and systemic catheter-related infection was estimated from literature reports that used micro-costing and other techniques. Among patients in whom standard, noncoated CVCs are in place for an average of 8 days, 24.7% are expected to develop catheter colonization (95% confidence interval [CI(95)], 22.0%-27.5%). Approximately 5.2% (CI(95), 3.9%-6.5%) will develop CR BSI. The attributable mortality of CR BSI remains unclear, but recent studies are consistent with a range from 4% to 20%. An episode of local catheter-related infection leads to an additional cost of approximately $400, whereas the additional cost of CR BSI ranges from approximately $6,005 to $9,738. Formal economic analyses indicate that CVCs coated with antibacterial agents (such as chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine or minocycline-rifampin) likely reduce infectious complications, yielding economic advantages. In light of the substantial clinical and economic burden of catheter-related infection, hospital personnel should adopt proven cost-effective methods to reduce this common and important nosocomial complication.     

成人家庭肠外营养患者PICC导管相关血流感染发病率的Meta分析

 目的 比较成人家庭肠外营养(HPN)患者经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管(PICC)与中心静脉导管(CVC)的导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)发病率,为HPN患者选择合适的静脉血管通路装置提供证据支持。方法 计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、JBI图书馆、Pubmed、Embase、Ovid、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普数据库、万方及中国知网建库至2019年3月关于HPN患者CRBSI发病率的研究,应用Stata 13.0进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入9篇队列研究文献,1 407例患者。Meta分析结果显示,使用PICC的HPN患者CRBSI发病率低于CVC (12.14% VS 37.18%,RR=0.42,95%CI:0.34~0.52)。有6篇文献报道CRBSI日发病率,结果显示PICC的CRBSI发病率低于CVC(12.97% VS 37.21%,RR=0.37,95%CI:0.23~0.60)。亚组分析结果显示,不同PICC置管方式组(超声引导、X线检查、未报道组)、报道CRBSI的诊断方法组、不同血管导管使用日数组(报道和未报道组)、报道感染菌群种类组PICC患者CRBSI发病率均低于CVC患者,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 与CVC相比,成人HPN患者选择PICC进行治疗时CRBSI的发生风险较低。     

Central venous catheter-related bacteremia due to gram-negative bacilli: significance of catheter removal in preventing relapse.

OBJECTIVE: To study the characteristics of catheter-related, gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) and the role of central venous catheter (CVC) removal. DESIGN: This retrospective study involved a search of the microbiological department records of CVC and blood cultures and patients' medical records. SETTING: University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, a tertiary-care hospital in Houston, Texas. PATIENTS: Patients with cancer who had catheter-related GNB, defined as (1) a positive catheter tip culture with at least 15 colony-forming units semiquantitatively, (2) isolation of the same organism from the tip and peripheral blood cultures, (3) no other source for bacteremia except the CVC, and (4) clinical manifestations of infection (fever or chills). RESULTS: Between January 1990 and December 1996, 72 cases of catheter-related GNB were available for review. Most of the patients (67; 93%) had their CVCs removed in response to the bacteremia. Few patients (5; 7%) retained their CVCs and were treated with appropriate antibiotics. When CVCs were removed, only 1 patient (1%) relapsed with the same organism, whereas all 5 patients with retained CVCs relapsed after having responded (P < .001). The most commonly isolated organisms were Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Stenotrophomonas, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter species. Catheter removal within 72 hours of the onset of the catheter-related GNB was the only independent protective factor against relapse of the infection (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.75; P = .02). CONCLUSION: In patients with documented catheter-related GNB, CVCs should be removed within 48 to 72 hours to prevent relapse.     

综合医院ICU中心静脉导管相关性血流感染发生率及危险因素

目的了解ICU中心静脉导管相关性血流感染(CRBSI)的发病率及危险因素,为制定预防控制措施提供依据。方法采用前瞻性调查方法对江苏省19所三级综合医院ICU中心静脉置管的患者进行监测,并对置管后的维护进行全过程管理;通过logistic回归分析模型,对CRBSI的相关因素进行分析。结果 CRBSI的发病密度为3.82/1000导管日,调查时间段中后三个季度CRBSI的发生率分别为2.55%、3.30%和2.99%,明显低于监测开始的4.73%,综合ICU CRBSI的发生率为3.50%,高于专科ICU的1.74%,导管留置天数和置管地点是CRBSI的独立危险因素。结论开展ICU医院感染目标性监测有助于降低CRBSI发病率,注重中心静脉导管置管后的维护和操作时的最大无菌屏障是降低CRBSI发生率的重要措施,缩短中心静脉导管留置时间可以减少CRBSI的概率。     

血管导管相关血流感染预防与控制最佳证据实施现状调查

目的 了解某省二级及以上医疗机构导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)预防与控制实施现状,为医疗机构采取有效措施落实最佳证据,降低CRBSI提供参考依据。方法 依据《血管导管相关感染预防与控制指南(2021版)》自行设计调查问卷,于2021年7月对某省二级及以上医疗机构CRBSI防控现状进行调查。结果 共回收问卷87份,有效问卷79份,有效回收率90.8%。79所医疗机构的CRBSI监测工作(89.9%)和防控制度的制定(94.9%)基本落实,但制度更新滞后,仅78.7%予以更新。68.4%的医院关注了本院近3年的CRBSI发病率,关注中心静脉导管(CVC)、经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)、透析导管相关感染发病率的医院较少,最低仅占38.9%。置管前评估(100%)和置管时置管者无菌操作技术(≥97.5%)落实较好。CRBSI防控指南落实的四个薄弱环节：仅有3.8%的医院选用含洗必泰醇浓度>0.5%的消毒剂进行皮肤消毒,54.4%的医院紧急状态下置管不能保证有效无菌操作技术时未在2 d内拔管,43.0%的医院存在病房内置管现象,43.0%的医院在使用导管输血后未在4 h内更换附加...     

A prospective, randomized study in critically ill patients using the Oligon Vantex catheter

Microbial colonization and the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) associated with Oligon Vantex silver central venous catheters (CVC) in critically ill patients were determined. A prospective, randomized, controlled 17-month trial was carried out in an intensive care unit (ICU). All patients requiring a triple-lumen CVC for four days or longer were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive a standard polyurethane CVC or an Oligon Vantex silver CVC. Before removal of the catheter either due to discharge from the ICU or suspected infection, blood for cultures was taken via the CVC and a peripheral site. Skin and hub swabs and catheter-tips were also cultured. Two hundred and six catheters, 103 in both groups, were evaluated. In the control group (CG) 45/103 (44%) and in the silver group (SG) 30/103 (29%) were colonized or had a CR-BSI (P=0.04). The SG was less likely to be colonized than the CG when the catheter remained in situ for eight days or less (P=0.03) or over 15 days (P=0.01); a second or subsequent catheter was present in the same patient (P=0.002), or if the CVC was placed in the internal jugular vein (P=0.05). Multivariate logistic-regression showed predisposing factors for catheter colonization were jugular and femoral sites, second or subsequent catheter, and being a member of the CG. CR-BSI occurred in five cases (four in CG). Rates of CR-BSI per 1000 catheter-days in the CG were 2.8 and in the SG, 0.8 (P<0.001). The Oligon Vantex silver catheter reduced the incidence of catheter-colonization and may decrease the risk of CR-BSI.     

Bloodstream infection related to catheter connections: a prospective trial of two connection systems

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) related to central venous catheters (CVCs) and arterial catheters (ACs) are an increasing problem in the management of critically ill patients. Our objective was to assess the efficacy of a needle-free valve connection system (SmartSite), Alaris Medical Systems, San Diego, CA, USA) in the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI). Patients admitted to an intensive care unit were prospectively assigned to have a CVC and AC connected with either a needle-free valve connection system (NFVCS) or a three-way stopcock connection (3WSC). The characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups. Before manipulation, the NFVCS was disinfected with chlorhexidine digluconate 0.5% alcoholic solution. The 3WSC was not disinfected between use but it was covered with a protection cap. A total of 799 patients requiring the insertion of a multilumen CVC or AC for >48h from 1 April 2002 to 31 December 2003 were included. CR-BSI rates were 4.61 per 1000 days of catheter use in the disinfected NFVCS group and 4.11 per 1000 days of catheter use in the 3WSC group (P=0.59). When CVC-BSIs and AC-BSIs were analysed separately, the rate of CVC-BSI was 4.26 per 1000 days of catheter use in the NFVCS group, compared with 5.27 in the 3WSC group (P=0.4). The incidence rate of AC-BSI was 5.00 per 1000 days of catheter use in the NFVCS group, compared with 2.83 in the 3WSC group (P=0.08). The use of NFVCS does not reduce the incidence of catheter-related bacteraemia. The arterial catheter (AC) is a significant source of infection in critically ill patients.     

Octenidine hydrochloride for the care of central venous catheter insertion sites in severely immunocompromised patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of octenidine hydrochloride, a non-alcoholic skin antiseptic, for the care of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion sites. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Bone marrow transplantation unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients with a nontunneled CVC were enrolled prospectively after informed consent. METHODS: Octenidine hydrochloride (0.1%) was applied for disinfection at the CVC insertion site during dressing changes. The following cultures were performed weekly as well as at the occurrence of any systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria: cultures of the skin surrounding the CVC entry site, cultures of the three-way hub connected to the CVC, blood cultures, and cultures of the CVC tip on removal. Enhanced microbiological methods (skin swabs of a 24-cm2 standardized area, roll plate, and sonication of catheter tips) were applied. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five CVCs were inserted in 62 patients during the study period and remained for a mean period of 19.1 days, corresponding to 2,462 catheter-days. Bacterial density at the insertion site declined substantially over time, and most cultures became negative 2 weeks after insertion. Only 6 patients had a documented catheter-related bloodstream infection. The incidence density was 2.39 catheter infections per 1,000 catheter-days. No side effects were noted with application of the antiseptic. CONCLUSIONS: Disinfection with a skin antiseptic that contains octenidine hydrochloride is highly active and well tolerated. It leads to a decrease in skin colonization over time and may be a new option for CVC care.     

Infusion therapy team and dressing changes of central venous catheters.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether central venous catheter (CVC) dressing changes could be performed by ward nurses rather than by the infusion therapy team (ITT) nurses without increasing the risk of catheter-related infection. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data. The study extended from January 1995 to June 1996. SETTING: The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, a referral cancer center. PATIENTS: The study group was a random sample of 483 patients who received CVC dressing changes by ward nurses during the study period. A random sample of 483 patients who received CVC dressing changes by the ITT constituted the control group. RESULTS: The risks of catheter-related septicemia were 1.7% among cases and 1.4% among controls (risk ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.26-6.42; P=.70). There also were no significant differences between the two groups in the risks of catheter-related site infection (risk ratio, 0.50; CI95, 0.02-4.12; P=.25) or any catheter-related infection (risk ratio=1.00; CI95, 0.27-3.64; P=.59). CONCLUSIONS: Provided that aseptic techniques (including maximal barrier precautions during insertion) are maintained, the responsibility of CVC dressing changes could be delegated to the ward nurses without increasing the low risk of CVC-related infection, resulting in an estimated cost saving in excess of $90,000 per year.     

A needleless closed system device (CLAVE) protects from intravascular catheter tip and hub colonization: a prospective randomized study

Hub colonization and subsequent intraluminal progression due to frequent opening and manipulation of intravenous systems is the cause of many catheter-related infections (CRI). A prospective, comparative, randomized study was performed to assess a new closed-needleless hub device (CLAVE) compared with conventional open systems (COS). End-points were hub and skin colonization, catheter tip colonization, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and number of accidental needlesticks. All cultures were processed following standard semiquantitative microbiological techniques. The study involved patients who underwent heart surgery over an 11-month period in a post-surgical ICU. During the study period, 352 patients underwent major heart surgery and 1774 catheters were inserted. Overall, 865 catheters in 178 patients were allocated to the CLAVE system and 909 catheters in 174 patients to COS. The groups were similar regarding underlying conditions and risk factors for infection. Comparison of endpoint results in CLAVE and COS groups was as follows: incidence density per 1000 catheter-days of tip colonization: 59.2 versus 83.6 (P=0.003); of hub colonization: 7.56 versus 24.66 (P=0.0017); of skin colonization: 41.5 versus 58.9 (P=0.038); and of CRBSI 3.78 versus 5.89 (P=0.4). There was one accidental needlestick and one catheter-related prosthetic endocarditis in the COS group. Multivariate analysis showed that CLAVE use was an independent protective factor for tip colonization. CLAVE offered significant protection from catheter-tip and hub colonization.     

Infection rates associated with total parenteral nutrition

The use of central venous access devices is increasingly common within healthcare, and such devices carry an associated risk of infection. Additional risk reduction strategies need exploring to reduce avoidable infections. A prospective 12-month audit was performed on the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate transparent, antimicrobial dressing to cover the catheter exit site in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. The results showed a decrease in catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) from eight cases to zero (P=0.057), making this film dressing a possible useful addition in the goal of zero avoidable CRBSIs within this high risk group of patients.     

Central Venous Catheter Salvage in Home Parenteral Nutrition Catheter‐Related Bloodstream Infections

Background: Catheter‐related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are a serious complication in the provision of home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Antibiotic salvage of central venous catheters (CVCs) in CRBSI is recommended; however, this is based on limited reports. We assessed the efficacy of antibiotic salvage of CRBSIs in HPN patients. Materials and Methods: All confirmed CRBSIs occurring in patients receiving HPN in a national intestinal failure unit (IFU), between 1993 and 2011, were analyzed. A standardized protocol involving antibiotic and urokinase CVC locks and systemic antibiotics was used. Results: In total, 588 patients were identified with a total of 2134 HPN years, and 297 CRBSIs occurred in 137 patients (65 single and 72 multiple CRBSIs). The overall rate of CRBSI in all patients was 0.38 per 1000 catheter days. Most (87.9%) infections were attributable to a single microorganism. In total, 72.5% (180/248) of CRBSIs were salvaged when attempted (coagulase‐negative staphylococcus, 79.8% [103/129], Staphylococcus aureus, 56.7% [17/30]; polymicrobial infections, 67.7% [21/30]; and miscellaneous, 66.1% [39/59]). CVC salvage was not attempted in 49 episodes because of life‐threatening sepsis (n = 18), fungal infection (n = 7), catheter problems (n = 20), and CVC tunnel infection (n = 4). Overall, the CVC was removed in 33.7% (100/297) of cases. There were 5 deaths in patients admitted to the IFU for management of the CRBSI (2 severe sepsis at presentation, 3 metastatic infection). Conclusions: This is the largest reported series of catheter salvage in CRBSIs and demonstrates successful catheter salvage in most cases when using a standardized protocol.     

Hospital-wide surveillance of catheter-related bloodstream infection: from the expected to the unexpected

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are among the most frequent healthcare-associated infections and cause considerable morbidity, mortality, and resource use. CRBSI surveillance serves quality improvement, but is often restricted to intensive care units (ICUs). We conducted a four-month prospective cohort study of all non-cuffed central venous catheters (CVCs) to design an efficient CRBSI surveillance and prevention programme. CVCs were assessed on a daily basis for ward exposure time, care parameters, and the occurrence of laboratory-confirmed CRBSI. Overall, 248 patients with 426 CVCs accounted for 3567 CVC-days (median: 5) and 15 CRBSI episodes. CVCs were inserted by anaesthetists, ICU physicians and internists in 45%, 47%, and 8% of cases, respectively. CVC utilisation rates for intensive care, internal medicine, non-abdominal surgery and abdominal surgery were 29.8, 3.8, 1.7 and 4.9 per 100 patient-days, respectively. Fourteen percent of patients changed wards while having a CVC in place, so spending CVC-days at risk within multiple departments. CRBSI incidence densities for ICU, internal medicine, surgery and abdominal surgery were 5.6, 1.9, 2.4 and 7.7 per 1000 CVC-days at risk, respectively. In a univariate Cox proportional hazards model, the high CRBSI rate in abdominal surgery was associated with longer CVC duration, frequent use of parenteral nutrition and CVC insertion by anaesthetists. CRBSI numbers were insufficient to perform a multivariate analysis. Our surveillance revealed similar CRBSI rates in both ICU and non-ICU departments, and when frequent ward transfers occurred. Hospital-wide CRBSI surveillance is advisable when a large proportion of CVC-days occur outside the ICU.     

批量重度烧伤患者中心静脉置管相关血流感染病例分析

目的了解批量重度烧伤患者中心静脉置管相关血流感染情况、危险因素及感染防控措施效果。方法某院2014年8月抢救了9例重度烧伤患者,对其行中心静脉置管术,置管全程对患者进行感染防控干预。结果 9例患者共进行中心静脉置管30例次,置管总日数227 d,其中2例患者股静脉三腔置管细菌培养阳性,导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)发病率为8.81‰;其中1例患者培养出屎肠球菌,另1例患者培养出鲍曼不动杆菌和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌。2例CRBSI患者均为股静脉置管,置管部位均为创面,置管时间均≥7 d,均为三腔置管,且患者Ⅲ°烧伤面积≥60%。经及时拔除导管和使用抗菌药物,2例感染患者均治愈。结论中心静脉置管有利于危重烧伤患者长期、安全、有效地补液,但其可导致CRBSI;对中心静脉导管置管患者进行全程感染防控干预,选用少腔导管,有助于降低CRBSI的发生。