An Audit of Waiting Times in the Diabetic Outpatient Clinic: Role of Patients' Punctuality and Level of Medical Staffing

A survey of patients' waiting times was performed in the follow-up clinics of a large hospital outpatient diabetic department (approximately 6500 patients). Over a period of 1 week, 138 patients attended 5 review outpatient clinics. The overall patient:doctor ratio was 11.1:1. Only 18.8 % of patients were seen by the doctor, and 86 % by the nurse within 30 min of their appointment time. A policy of strict adherence to the formal appointment times was implemented but had no effect on the waiting time (20 % of patients were seen by the doctor, and 82.2 % by the nurse within 30 min of their appointment time). The combined effects of adherence to actual appointment times and increasing the number of doctors (lowering the patient:doctor ratio to 7.7:1), reduced the total waiting times, and increased the proportion of patients seen by the doctor or nurse within 30 min of their appointment time, to 31 % and 100 %, respectively. Strict adherence to appointment times was difficult to implement and ineffective but the patient:doctor ratio was important in determining waiting times in the diabetic clinic. Inadequate medical staffing of diabetic outpatient clinics is a major cause of prolonged waiting time for patients. This approach may be useful in assessing and improving the organizational efficiency of a diabetes service.     

Medication education of acutely hospitalized older patients

OBJECTIVES: To determine the amount of time spent providing medication education to older patients, the impact of medication education on patients' knowledge and satisfaction, and barriers to providing medication education. DESIGN: Telephone survey of patients within 48 hours of hospital discharge and direct survey of physicians and pharmacists. SETTING: Internal medicine ward in a tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients 65 years of age and over regularly taking at least one medication. MEASUREMENTS: Patient demographics, medication use, time spent receiving or providing medication education, and satisfaction scores. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-seven respondents with a mean age of 77.1 years reported that physicians spent a mean of 10.5 minutes (range, 0-60 minutes) and pharmacists spent a mean of 5.3 minutes (range, 0-40 minutes) providing medication education. Fifty-one percent reported receiving no education from either physician or pharmacist, and only 30% reported receiving written medication instructions. Respondents were generally quite satisfied with their education. Physicians identified one or more barriers to providing education 51% of the time and pharmacists 80%. Lack of time was the most common barrier (18%) identified by physicians, but pharmacists cited lack of notification of discharge plans (41%) and lack of time (39%) as the main barriers. Respondents made many medication errors and knew little about their medications. CONCLUSIONS: Although older hospitalized patients received little medication education or written information and made many medication errors with and without medication education, approximately one half of physicians perceived no barriers to providing education.     

Improving Emergency Department Door to Doctor Time and Process Reliability: A Successful Implementation of Lean Methodology

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of using lean management methods on improving emergency department door to doctor times at a tertiary care hospital.We performed a before and after study at an academic urban emergency department with 49,000 annual visits after implementing a series of lean driven interventions over a 20 month period. The primary outcome was mean door to doctor time and the secondary outcome was length of stay of both admitted and discharged patients. A convenience sample from the preintervention phase (February 2012) was compared to another from the postintervention phase (mid-October to mid-November 2013). Individual control charts were used to assess process stability.Postintervention there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean door to doctor time measure (40.0 minutes ± 53.44 vs 25.3 minutes ± 15.93 P < 0.001). The postintervention process was more statistically in control with a drop in the upper control limits from 148.8 to 72.9 minutes. Length of stay of both admitted and discharged patients dropped from 2.6 to 2.0 hours and 9.0 to 5.5 hours, respectively. All other variables including emergency department visit daily volumes, hospital occupancy, and left without being seen rates were comparable.Using lean change management techniques can be effective in reducing door to doctor time in the Emergency Department and improving process reliability.     

Establishing patient preferences for gastroenterology clinic reorganization using conjoint analysis

OBJECTIVE: The Department of Health states that patients with suspected cancer should be seen within 2 weeks, and the Patients' Charter suggests that patients should not wait for more than 30 min in outpatients. Decisions such as these are often made with little assessment of patient preferences. We have elicited patient preferences for the optimal use of time in the outpatient clinic. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey eliciting preference between different clinic scenarios evaluated using discrete choice conjoint analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending a teaching hospital gastroenterology outpatient clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relative importance of time spent on the waiting list, time waiting in the clinic, time spent with the specialist, and time waiting for investigation was assessed using a logit model. RESULTS: Patients placed a similar value on waiting for investigation and time spent on the waiting list. A clinic that had a 2-month waiting list but offered immediate investigations would therefore be more popular than a clinic that had a 2-week waiting list but whose investigations were deferred for 3 months. Patients would be prepared to spend an extra 30 min in the waiting room if they spent 1 month less on the waiting list or waiting for investigation. Time spent with a specialist is valued, and patients would be prepared to spend an extra 3 min waiting in the clinic for every extra minute spent with the doctor. CONCLUSIONS: The present Department of Health recommendations and the Patients' Charter are too simplistic and do not take into account patient preferences.     

Impact of interpretation method on clinic visit length

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of interpretation method on outpatient visit length. DESIGN: Time-motion study. SETTING: Hospital-based outpatient teaching clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients presenting for scheduled outpatient visits. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Over a 6-week study period, a research assistant recorded the following information for consecutive patient visits: patient age, gender and insurance type; type of interpreter used (none, hospital interpreter, telephone interpreter or patient-supplied interpreter); scheduled visit length; provider type (nurse practitioner; attending physician; resident in postgraduate year 1, 2 or 3, or medical student); provider gender; amount of time the patient spent in the examination room with the provider (provider time); and total time the patient spent in the clinic from check-in to checkout (clinic time). When compared to patients not requiring an interpreter, patients using some form of interpreter had longer mean provider times (32.4 minutes [min] vs 28.0 min, P <.001) and clinic times (93.6 min vs 82.4 min, P =.002). Compared to patients not requiring an interpreter, patients using a telephone interpreter had significantly longer mean provider times (36.3 min vs 28.0 min, P <.001) and clinic times (99.9 min vs 82.4 min, P =.02). Similarly, patients using a patient-supplied interpreter had longer mean provider times (34.4 min vs 28.0 min, P <.001) and mean clinic times (92.8 min vs 82.4 min, P =.027). In contrast, patients using a hospital interpreter did not have significantly different mean provider times (26.8 min vs 28.0 min, P =.51) or mean clinic times (91.0 min vs 82.4 min, P =.16) than patients not requiring an interpreter. CONCLUSION: In our setting, telephone and patient-supplied interpreters were associated with longer visit times, but full-time hospital interpreters were not.     

Physicians' comfort in caring for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain

BACKGROUND: More than 100 million U.S. adults experience chronic nonmalignant pain. Many physicians are uncomfortable managing such patients. We sought to determine the timing and intensity of training that primary care physicians receive in chronic pain treatment, and the effect of training on their comfort in managing patients. METHODS: The 4P Study was a cross-sectional study conducted at 12 academic medical centers in the United States. More than 500 primary care physicians completed a survey regarding their attitudes toward patients with chronic nonmalignant pain and their education in chronic pain management. RESULTS: We received 572 surveys out of 753 distributed. The respondents' mean age was 35 years; 64% were white, non-Hispanic and 41% were women. Eighty-eight percent were internists, and mean years spent in practice were 7.6. Fifty-seven percent of the physicians felt that they should serve as the principal doctor managing patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Only 34% of physicians felt comfortable in managing patients with chronic pain. More intensive education after entry into practice was associated with the highest comfort level. CONCLUSIONS: Most primary care physicians are not comfortable treating patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Education increases primary care physicians' comfort in managing these patients. Increased comfort was associated with the willingness of primary care physicians to take charge of managing chronic pain. In addition, physician comfort is greatest when pain management skills are taught after residency training.     

Should the elderly be resuscitated following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?

PURPOSE: Elderly and younger patients who were successfully resuscitated and hospitalized following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were studied to determine if there was a significant difference in hospital course and long-term survival between the two groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study consisted of 214 consecutive patients, divided into two age groups: elderly (more than 70 years, n = 112) and younger (less than 70 years, n = 102). Hospital charts and paramedic run data were retrospectively reviewed for each patient and findings were compared between the two age groups. RESULTS: Prior to cardiac arrest, 47 of 112 (42 percent) elderly patients had a history of heart failure, compared with 19 of 102 (18 percent) younger patients, and were more commonly taking digitalis (51 percent versus 29 percent) and diuretics (47 percent versus 26 percent). Younger patients, however, more often had an acute myocardial infarction at the time of the cardiac arrest (33 percent versus 16 percent). At the time of cardiac arrest, 83 percent of younger patients demonstrated ventricular fibrillation, compared with 71 percent of the elderly. In contrast, electromechanical dissociation was five times more common in the elderly patients. Although hospital deaths were more common in the elderly (71 percent versus 53 percent), the length of hospitalization and stay in intensive care units were not significantly different between the age groups. The number of neurologic deaths was similar in both age groups, as were residual neurologic impairments. Only five elderly patients and six younger patients required placement in extended-care facilities. Calculated long-term survival curves demonstrated similar survival in both age groups, with approximately 65 percent of hospital survivors alive at 24 months after hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Resuscitation of elderly patients in whom out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurs is reasonable and appropriate, according to the findings of this study. Even though elderly patients are more likely than younger patients to die during hospitalization, the hospital stay of the elderly is not longer, the elderly do not have more residual neurologic impairments, and survival after hospital discharge is similar to that in younger patients.     

A survey of cardiological emergencies in Piedmont]

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN. In order to assess the current behavioural status of patients receiving emergency cardiological treatment and the emergency services in the Piedmont Region, our Division carried out a survey of the Region's DEA and first aid centres based on the compilation of a questionnaire for each patient who passed through these structures over a 5-month period. The study included only patients hospitalised within 12 hours of symptoms' onset. The questionnaire aimed to assess the time the patient took to reach a decision, the eventual call for a home visit, the type of doctor called, the time spent by the doctor, the use of either a private vehicle or of an ambulance for transport to hospital, the time taken to get to the hospital, and the overall time taken to admit the patient to the emergency cardiological ward. The statistical analysis of data was carried out using both single and multiple variables. The selection of prognostic variables was carried out using a stepwise method. RESULTS. Data presented in this study refer to 1705 records, collected in 39 Piedmontese hospitals (75% of those with DEA or First Aid Center). Patients with acute myocardial infarction were 970 (57%). A doctor was requested at home in nearly half of the cases (49.3%). There was no correlation between the type of emergency and the request for a home visit, whereas the latter varied in relation to the different geographical areas and to the patients' age. A small majority of patients used personal transport to get to the hospital (55.5%) in comparison to those using an ambulance (44.5%) (p less than 0.001). Time taken to reach a decision was related to the type of pathology (acute pulmonary edema less than acute myocardial infarction less than arrhythmia) and to geographical area; mean decision time in the overall sample was 125 +/- 158 minutes. The mean duration of doctors' intervention at home was 74 +/- 82 minutes. The mean time taken to reach the hospital using private transport was 22 minutes, and the time taken using ambulance was the same, but this should be added to the time taken for the ambulance to reach the patient (a mean total time of 15 minutes). Overall mean hospitalisation time was 192 minutes. CONCLUSIONS. The critical factors causing delay in hospitalisation time are the poor levels of health education of the population in general, and the poor activation capacity of certain peripheral parts of the National Health Service. In particular, it is worth drawing attention to the delay due to the intervention of the family doctor in the current organisational model. Doctors called from first aid stations are able to provide a more rapid intervention, but are currently unable to meet the requirements of patients needing emergency cardiological treatments. These data confirm the rationale for intervention projects in cardiological emergencies, considering on one hand that a fleet of special vehicles be created, and on the other that doctors from first aid stations be specifically trained and increasingly involved.     

Characteristics and management of patients presenting to the emergency department with hypertensive urgency

Few studies have examined the characteristics of patients presenting with hypertensive urgency, factors contributing to their presentation, or their management. The time and cost associated with treatment are unknown. Retrospective analysis of 50 emergency department patients with hypertensive urgency (symptomatic blood pressure (BP) elevation focusing on systolic BP >180 mm Hg or diastolic BP >110 mm Hg) was performed. The hospital database was queried to determine the cost of the average treat-and-release visit. The mean age was 54.3+/-15.6 years; 64% were female; 46% were black; 90% had diagnosed hypertension. The mean presenting BP was 198+/-27.6/109+/-17.3 mm Hg; 66% had systolic BP >180 mm Hg, and 38% had diastolic BP >110 mm Hg. Initially, 30% were not on antihypertensives, and 28% were on monotherapy. Headache (42%) and dizziness (30%) were most frequently reported symptoms. Presentation was most often attributed to running out of medication (16%). IV and oral labetalol were given to 28% and 24% of patients, respectively. Fifty-six percent of patients had no change in baseline therapy at discharge. The average emergency department stay was 5 hours 17 minutes +/- 4 hours 27 minutes. The average cost for similar visits in 2004 was 1543 dollars per visit. Emergency department visits for hypertensive urgency are related mostly to noncompliance. Labetalol was the most frequently used therapy. Management in the primary care office could result in substantial cost savings.     

Sleep fragmentation in patients from a nursing home

Institutionalized elderly persons are said to have very disturbed sleep, yet few studies have collected empirical data on the sleep of these patients. We recorded sleep in 200 patients (131 females and 69 males; mean age = 81.9 years, SD = 8.6) in a skilled nursing facility. A modified Respitrace-Medilog portable recording system was used. In recordings averaging 15.4 hours, the patients were asleep for 7 hours, 58 minutes and awake for 7 hours, 28 minutes. To obtain that amount of sleep, the patients spent an extended time in bed during the day, for they averaged no more than 39.5 minutes of sleep per hour in any hour of the night, and 50% woke up at least 2 to 3 times per hour. In summary, although nursing home patients slept on average only one hour longer than independently living elderly, they had to spend substantially more time in bed to obtain the same amount of sleep.     

Long-term,indwelling setons for low transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistulas

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the technique and results of long-term, indwelling setons for low transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistulas. METHOD: Long-term, indwelling setons were performed in 108 consecutive patients with low transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistulas. Progress and results of 73.1 percent of cases were assessed in a retrospective study. RESULTS: Therapy lasted for an average of 54.8 weeks; mean follow-up was 62 weeks. Relapse occurred in 3.7 percent of cases and incontinence in 0.9 percent. Average period spent in a hospital was 0.3 days/case. CONCLUSIONS: A long-term, indwelling seton is a good alternative to primary surgical treatment of low transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistulas. Relapse quota is comparable with that of primary surgically treated cases; incontinence is rarer with long-term, indwelling seton. Complete treatment can generally be performed in the outpatient department. One disadvantage is that therapy takes much longer than cases treated by primary surgery.     

How much of a primary care nurse's time is spent on those with respiratory disease? A pilot study.

A pilot study was undertaken to assess the respiratory component of primary care nurses' working time. 13 nurses were interviewed and 10 completed a diary during one working week. The nurses spent a mean 6.6% of their time caring for those with respiratory disease and were of the opinion that during this time they undertook 68% of the management of long term respiratory illness in the practices. More time was spent with those with asthma than with other respiratory conditions and the nurses felt that they were appropriately trained for the tasks undertaken. However, with more training they felt that they could undertake more basic care of those patients with COPD, and more advanced care of those patients with asthma.     

The role of rapid vs conventional human immunodeficiency virus testing for inpatients: effects on quality of care

BACKGROUND: Rapid testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has improved HIV screening in the outpatient and perinatal settings, but few data report how it may be used to improve the quality of inpatient care. We compared quality of care for inpatients diagnosed in the emergency department via rapid testing vs patients whose conditions were diagnosed via conventional testing during their hospital admission. METHODS: We reviewed medical records to identify patients with first-time positive HIV tests and concurrent hospital admission who were tested via either rapid testing in the emergency department or conventional testing during their hospital admission. We compared quality-of-care end points for these patients. RESULTS: We identified 103 HIV-infected inpatients with no previous HIV diagnosis; the conditions of 48 patients (47%) were diagnosed by rapid testing and 55 (53%) by conventional testing. Mean length of stay was 6 days for the rapid test group vs 13 days for the conventional test group (P<.001); multivariate regression analysis showed that testing modality had an independent, statistically significant effect on length of stay. Nine (16%) of the patients in the conventional test group vs none in the rapid test group were discharged without receiving their HIV test results (P = .002). Patients in the rapid test group attended the outpatient HIV clinic in a mean of 22 days vs 50 days for the conventional test group patients (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid HIV testing in the emergency department preceding admission may shorten hospital stay, increase the number of newly diagnosed patients with HIV who are discharged from the hospital aware of their HIV status, and improve entry into outpatient care for patients admitted at the time of their initial HIV diagnosis.     

I was sick and you came to visit me: time spent at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses

PURPOSE: To learn how much time hospital staff and families spend at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: An observational study was made of 58 inpatients with cancer, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, heart failure, obstructive lung disease, or advanced dementia, along with their families and the physicians and nurses working on the medical floors of a university hospital, using direct videotape surveillance of patients' doorways. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) total visitor-minutes spent in the rooms of these patients was 321 +/- 297 minutes per day. On average, patients spent 18 hours 39 minutes per day alone. Mean visit durations were 3 +/- 3 minutes for attending physicians (including consultants), 3 +/- 2 minutes for house officers, 2 +/- 1 minutes for nurses, and 24 +/- 51 minutes for family. The total person-visits per patient per day were 3 +/- 3 for attending physicians, 9 +/- 8 for house officers, 45 +/- 23 for nurses, and 13 +/- 21 for family. Patient sex and age were not significantly associated with total visitor-minutes. In a repeated-measures analysis of variance model, nonwhite patients received fewer total visitor-minutes than did white patients, and patients with dementia received fewer total visitor-minutes than did patients with other diagnoses, especially those with malignancy. Do-not-resuscitate orders were associated with slightly more total visitor-minutes. CONCLUSIONS: These seriously ill patients with poor prognoses spent most of their time in the hospital alone. Staff visits were frequent but brief. These data do not confirm anecdotal reports that staff members spend less time at the bedsides of patients with do-not-resuscitate orders. Patients with advanced dementia and minority patients appear to have less bedside contact. Further study is required to confirm these findings and to understand optimal visit time for medical inpatients with poor prognoses.     

Laparoscopic-assisted resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse

PURPOSE: Objectives of this study were to describe the technique of laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy and audit the clinical outcomes, including review of functional results. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for duration of operation, time to passage of flatus and feces postoperatively, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Follow-up was performed by an independent assessor using a standardized questionnaire. Patients were also assessed by clinical review or telephone interview. RESULTS: During a four-year period, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse, of which 30 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy. Median duration of the operations was 185 minutes, median time for passage of flatus was two days postoperatively, and median length of hospital stay was five days. Morbidity was 13 percent and mortality rate was 3 percent. Comparison between the first ten patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy and the last ten revealed a significant reduction in both median duration of operating time (224vs. 163 minutes;P<0.005) and length of stay (6vs. 4 days;P<0.015). Follow-up study conducted at a median time of 18 months revealed that most patients (92 percent) felt that the operation had improved their symptoms, that incontinence was improved in 14 of 20 patients with impaired continence (70 percent), and that constipation was improved in 64 percent. Symptoms of incomplete emptying and the need to strain at stool were both improved in 62 and 59 percent of patients, respectively. No full-thickness recurrences have occurred, but two patients have had mucosal prolapse detected (7 percent) and treated. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy is feasible and safe, with acceptable recurrence rates and functional results compared with the open procedure in the surgical literature. There is rapid return of intestinal function associated with an early discharge from hospital.Read at the meeting of The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Brisbane, Australia, May 11 to 15, 1997.     

Analysis of emergency department visits by elderly patients in an urban public hospital in Turkey

Background/PurposeElderly patients have higher rates of emergency department visits worldwide. Emergency department utilization by older elderly is much more than younger elderly due to their disease complexity, comorbidities, and severity. This study aimed to determine the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of elderly patients admitted to the emergency department of a hospital and to compare attendance data regarding older age groups.MethodsAll older people admitted to the emergency department in 2011 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients aged 65–74 years were defined as younger elderly and those aged ≥75 years as older elderly. The prevalence of emergency admission, demographic information, reason for visit, time of admission, diagnosis of disease, and disposition of the two age groups were compared. The Chi-square test was used to analyze data.ResultsThe mean age of the elderly patients was 74.7 ± 6.8 years; 56.7% of them were female. Elderly patients accounted for 11.9% of all emergency department visits. The mean number of emergency department visits per year was 1.15 for older elderly patients and 0.75 for younger elderly patients (p < 0.001). The season in which emergency visits are most frequent was winter, and the most frequent presentation times were evening and night shifts (18:00–23:59 hours). The most common emergency department diagnosis among older and younger elderly patients was related to circulatory disease (26.3% and 21.2%, respectively; p < 0.001). Nearly 90% of the elderly were discharged from the emergency department. Older elderly patients were more likely to be admitted to the hospital than younger elderly patients (14.3% vs. 4.7%).ConclusionThe annual rates of admission to the emergency departments and hospitals were significantly higher in the older elderly population than in the younger elderly population. The most common diagnoses among elderly patients were disorders of the circulatory system.     

Additional risk factors in atrial fibrillation patients not receiving warfarin.

OBJECTIVE: To study how many elderly inpatients with previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation were not receiving anticoagulant prophylaxis, and the prevalence of additional risk factors in these patients. METHODS: All new admissions to a department of medicine for the elderly were screened for atrial fibrillation. Additional risk factors were analysed in those with established atrial fibrillation who were not receiving warfarin. Previous hospital admissions, documentation of why prophylaxis was not being used and use of aspirin as an alternative agent were also examined. RESULTS: 56 patients had previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation; 82% were not taking warfarin and 71% of these were not on aspirin either. All patients not taking warfarin had one additional risk factor for stroke and 95% had two or more. Fifty-two percent had attended hospital when atrial fibrillation was present within the previous 3 years and there was nothing documented in their records to explain why anticoagulation had not been used. CONCLUSIONS: Most elderly inpatients with established atrial fibrillation were not taking warfarin. All had additional risk factors for stroke, which increase the absolute benefit of anticoagulation.     

Social conditions in the daily life of asthmatic patients]

To investigate the social conditions in the daily lives of asthmatic patients in Japan, a nationwide survey was performed using a questionnaire compiled by a joint research group and conducted by The national hospital treatment joint research group and The national sanatorium central research group. This study was carried out on 3,331 patients with childhood asthma and 4,398 patients with adulthood asthma in 1995. The results were as follows. (1) More than half of the asthmatic patients had been admitted to hospital at least once. (2) When experiencing an asthmatic attack, more than 80% of patients had difficulties with daily activities. Even when not experiencing an asthmatic attack, 14% of patients with childhood asthma and 40% of patients with adulthood asthma had difficulties with daily activities. The frequency of difficulties in daily life increased when the asthma was more severe or the patient was elderly. (3) More than 60% of adulthood patients felt that there were obstacles to their hopes or plans in life. The frequency of obstacles increased in patients with more severe asthma and in more elderly patients. (4) Fifteen percent of adult patients experienced work disabilities due to asthma (giving up work, changing job, leaving school, changing their school). (5) Because of asthmatic attacks, 64% of child patients and 49% of adult patients needed to take at least one day off. The outcome of this survey highlighted the condition of asthmatic patients in Japan. During the treatment of asthma, not only control of asthmatic attacks but also the social conditions of the patients in their daily lives should be considered and addressed.     

Effect of previous surgery on abdominal opening time

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to document prospectively the time required to gain access to the abdomen to perform a planned procedure in patients with and without previous surgery. METHODS: Patients were obtained from the consecutive cases of 11 surgeons at three colorectal surgery centers. Opening time (skin incision to retractor placement) was measured and recorded in the operating room by the circulating nurse or by an independent researcher. Demographic data including the number and type of previous operations and the presence and severity of adhesions were recorded by the staff surgeon. A comparison of opening times between patients with and without previous abdominal operations was conducted. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight patients had abdominal operations. Fifty-five percent had previous abdominal procedures. Patients with prior surgery required a mean of 21 minutes to open their abdomens, whereas patients without prior surgery required a mean of 6 minutes (P<0.01). The median times were 17 and 6 minutes, respectively. Eighty-three percent of patients with prior surgery had adhesions, whereas only 7 percent of patients had adhesions on their initial operation. Patients with prior surgery also had higher grade adhesions (P<0.001). Irrespective of previous surgery, comparing patients with adhesions with those without, patients with adhesions required a mean of 22 minutes to open, whereas the lack of adhesions resulted in a mean opening time of 6 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Previous surgery and the presence of adhesions add significant time to opening the abdomen.     

The cost of childhood asthma to Australian families

There have been no estimates of the actual cost of asthma care to Australian families. Previous estimates have been of the total cost to the community and have relied upon data collected by government departments and agencies. It was the aim of this investigation to estimate the cost of childhood asthma from the parents perspective in Australian families. A total of 238 asthmatic children aged 8–12 years were identified through prevalence studies of asthma in Sydney and Belmont, N.S.W. Children were selected if they had wheezed in the previous 12 months, had used asthma medicines or had airway hyperresponsiveness when tested. The study sample had wide range of asthma severity. Data were collected retrospectively and prospectively. Parents completed questionnaire which asked about health insurance and special asthma equipment costs in the previous 12 months. Every 2 weeks for total of 3 months between February and June parents completed further questionnaires which assessed costs incurred because of their child's asthma, together with time spent obtaining treatment. Items included doctor consultations and tests, alternative practitioner consultations and tests, medications and alternative therapies purchased, hospital and ambulance use, and the cost of childcare as consequence of asthma. We collected two or more months of prospective data from total of 193 children. The mean annual cost of asthma to the family was A$212.48 per asthmatic child and 13.4 hr were spent obtaining treatment. For the group of children who had not visited doctor in the previous year, the mean annual cost was A$85.60 and 13.1 hr were spent obtaining treatment. For the group of children who had been admitted to hospital in the previous year, the mean annual cost was A$884.34 and 153.0 hr were spent obtaining treatment. We conclude that the cost of asthma and the time spent obtaining treatment increases with increasing severity of the illness. In cases in which the child's asthma is severe enough to require hospitalisation in the previous 12 months, the cost to the family may be considerable. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.