内镜窄带成像与染色技术诊断大肠肿瘤的对比研究

目的通过窄带成像技术（NBI）和染色放大方法对大肠新生性病变进行观察，比较这两种技术对大肠肿瘤及非肿瘤性病变的鉴别诊断精度差异。方法2006年6月至9月间，共302例年龄在加至80岁之间的患者进行了NBI肠镜检查，其中98例入选。内镜插入至回盲部，退镜时分别采用常规模式、NBI模式观察，发现病变后，分别用NBI模式及染色放大方法进行血管分型及腺管开口分型，然后行病理检查进行评价比较。结果在98例患者发现新生性病变147个，其中常规内镜下发现的病变有90．5％（133／147），采用NBI发现病变有98．6％（145／147），差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01），漏诊的主要为平坦型病变。NBI观察对肿瘤性或非肿瘤的判断符合率为91．8％，染色内镜为82．3％（P〈0.01）。结论NBI技术观察黏膜表面变化，判断肿瘤或非肿瘤病变的符合率比普通内镜和染色内镜高，敏感性强；操作转换简单易行，尤其有利于平坦型病变的发现及诊断。     

高清不放大窄带成像内镜对大肠隆起性病变的鉴别诊断作用

目的评价窄带成像技术(NBI)普通内镜在大肠隆起样病变诊断中价值。方法应用NBI普通内镜观察了80例患者共103个大肠隆起样病变的表面腺管开口形态。根据工藤进英腺管开口形态分型法,将NBI内镜诊断结果与病理检查结果进行比较。结果普通肠镜发现隆起样病变的敏感性为80.0%(80/103),切换NBI后,能清楚显示隆起样病变的形态和边界,发现隆起样病变的敏感性为100%(103/103);NBI普通内镜观察隆起样病变腺管开口,根据工藤进英腺管开口形态分型法进行诊断,其中腺管开口呈Ⅱ型18例,Ⅲ(L)型54例,Ⅳ型15例,Ⅴ型16例。NBI普通内镜对于大肠隆起性病变肿瘤及非肿瘤性的鉴别诊断的敏感性、特异性分别为95.3%(81/85)、83.3%(15/18)、NBI普通内镜对于大肠隆起性病变肿瘤及非肿瘤性的鉴别诊断的符合率为93.2%(96/103),与文献报道的NBI放大内镜的94.1%无统计学差异(P0.05)。结论应用NBI普通内镜,也可以通过观察腺管开口形态,比较准确地鉴别诊断大肠肿瘤与非肿瘤病变。     

窄带成像技术在大肠肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变的鉴别诊断中的价值

目的探讨窄带成像技术(narrow band imaging,NBI)在大肠肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变的鉴别诊断中的价值。方法收集2010年1月-2013年10月在梧州红十字会医院内镜室进行结肠镜检查的患者98例,通过普通肠镜、NBI检查结果与病理学检查结果进行对比分析,鉴别诊断大肠肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变。结果 98例患者中共发现136个病变。普通内镜诊断肿瘤性病变的敏感性、特异性及准确性分别为75.5%、78.6%及76.5%;NBI诊断肿瘤性病变的敏感性、特异性及准确性分别为95.7%、95.2%及95.6%,后者明显高于前者,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。病变轮廓、pit及CP显示清晰度比较,NBI明显优于普通内镜,差异均有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论相对于普通内镜,NBI内镜能更清晰地显示病变的轮廓、腺管开口的分型及微血管的形态,在大肠肿瘤性病变与非肿瘤性病变的鉴别诊断中有重要价值。     

A comparison of magnifying and nonmagnifying colonoscopy for diagnosis of colorectal polyps: A prospective study

BACKGROUND: Discrimination between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps is essential for determining appropriate treatment. The mucosal crypt pattern of polyps can be observed with a nonmagnifying colonoscope; however, mucosal crypt patterns are better seen by magnifying colonoscopy, which can also be a noninvasive means for predicting histopathology. This study prospectively compared the ability to distinguish between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions by magnifying and nonmagnifying colonoscopy. METHODS: Six hundred sixty patients were randomly assigned to undergo magnifying or nonmagnifying colonoscopy (2 groups each of 330 patients). The mucosal crypt pattern of colorectal lesions was classified into types I through V after spraying with 0.2% Indigo carmine dye. The histopathology of all lesions was confirmed by evaluation of endoscopic resection specimens or biopsy specimens. Only lesions 10 mm or less in diameter were included in the study. RESULTS: The accuracy of magnifying colonoscopy in distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions (92%, 372/405) was significantly higher than for nonmagnifying colonoscopy (68%, 278/407). Insertion of magnifying and nonmagnifying colonoscopes to the cecum was successful in, respectively, 321 patients (97%) and 317 patients (96%), with no significant differences in the average time to reach the cecum or average total procedure time. No serious complication was observed during or immediately after the examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Observation of mucosal crypt pattern with magnifying colonoscopy is superior to nonmagnifying colonoscopy for distinguishing between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions.     

窄带成像结肠镜对结肠息肉样病变的诊断价值

探讨窄带成像（NBI）结肠镜对结肠息肉样病变的病理组织类型的预测能力.方法 125例患者接受结肠镜检查诊断结肠息肉样病变173个,根据腺管开口形态及NBI下血管分型判定该病变为肿瘤性病变（结肠腺瘤、结肠癌）或非肿瘤性病变,并与病理结果对照,判定各种方法的敏感性、特异性及准确率.结果 NBI下血管形态鉴别肿瘤性或非肿瘤性病变的敏感性、特异性及准确率（94.83%、91.23%、93.64%）以及隐窝形态结合血管形态鉴别肿瘤性或非肿瘤性病变的敏感性、特异性及准确率（95.69%、96.49%、95.59%）显著高于常规内镜（80.17%、84.21%、81.50%）（P〈0.05）.血管形态鉴别腺瘤与结肠癌的敏感性、特异性、准确率为86.90%、100.00%、87.93%.结论 NBI模式下结肠镜检查对息肉样病变的肿瘤性、非肿瘤性,结肠腺瘤、结肠癌的鉴别优于常规内镜检查,接近病理学检查.     

Further validation of magnifying chromocolonoscopy for differentiating colorectal neoplastic polyps in a health screening center

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The accuracy of conventional colonoscopy to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps is limited, justifying a biopsy for histologic analysis. Magnifying chromocolonoscopy has emerged as the best tool available for differentiating adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps during colonoscopy; however, magnifying endoscopes are rarely used in endoscopy units. This study aimed to further validate the effectiveness of magnifying chromocolonoscopy in the diagnosis of neoplastic colorectal polyps in a screening center. METHOD: Five hundred average-risk subjects were randomly divided into two groups: a magnifying chromocolonoscopy group and a conventional chromocolonoscopy group, each of 250 subjects. Lesions were analyzed according to Kudo's classification of pit pattern (types I-V) and additionally subdivided into non-neoplastic (types I-II) and neoplastic (types III-V). Lesions judged as neoplastic were resected and those judged as non-neoplastic were left in situ. Only lesions < or =10 mm were included in the study. Resected lesions were analyzed with histopathological examination. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of magnifying chromocolonoscopy for differentiating neoplastic lesions (95%, 135 of 142), was significantly higher than that of conventional chromocolonoscopy (84%, 102 of 122; P < 0.01). The accuracy of magnifying chromocolonoscopy for differentiating neoplastic lesions < or =5 mm was 94% (135 of 142), whereas that of conventional chromocolonoscopy was only 78% (69 of 89; P < 0.001). Results were not affected by the macroscopic types. CONCLUSION: Magnifying chromocolonoscopy is superior to conventional chromocolonoscopy for the diagnosis of colorectal neoplastic lesions in the setting of a health testing center.     

窄带成像技术普通内镜与放大内镜对大肠肿瘤诊断价值的对比研究

目的 探讨窄带成像技术（NBI）模式下普通内镜和放大内镜对大肠肿瘤性与非肿瘤性病变的鉴别诊断价值.方法 选择2008年9月至2010年2月间内镜中心行NBI内镜检查发现的大肠新生性病变的患者,对发现的大肠新生性病变进行黏膜表面细微腺管开口形态分型及微血管形态分型,综合工藤进英腺管开口形态分型法与佐野宁微血管形态分型法进行诊断,将NBI内镜诊断结果与病理诊断结果进行对比分析.100例患者符合条件纳入研究,其中行NBI普通内镜64例,行NBI放大内镜36例.结果 排除不符合诊断标准的7例病例（NBI普通内镜5例,NBI放大内镜2例）,NBI内镜对大肠肿瘤性与非肿瘤性病变诊断的总符合率为91.4%（85/93）,其中NBI普通内镜为89.8%（53/59）,NBI放大内镜为94.1%（32/34）,均明显高于文献报道传统内镜的79.1%（P均＜0.05）,但NBI普通内镜与NBI放大内镜间比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.结论 与NBI放大内镜相似,NBI普通内镜也可比较准确地鉴别大肠肿瘤性与非肿瘤性病变.     

Magnifying colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma invading the submucosa in familial adenomatous polyposis

The development of colonoscopy with image magnification has enable to study the colonic mucosa in detail and to do differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions from the observation of pit patterns. The results are comparable to stereomicroscopy being possible to predict the histologic diagnosis. In a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis magnifying colonoscopy was performed and this method demonstrated a wide variation of benign polypoid lesions and the morphological features of early colorectal cancer. In this patient, the evaluation by image magnification, together with indigo carmin 0.4% chromoscopy, showed a wide variety of lesions in the colon and rectum: laterally spreading tumor in the cecum, with IIIL + IV pits, subpediculate polyp in the transverse colon with approximately 2.0 cm diameter and IV + V pits, flat elevated lesions IIIL type, and in the sigmoid colon IIa + IIc lesion with V type of Kudo's classification were observed. The evaluation of pit patterns of the lesions in the transverse and sigmoid colon has enable to do the endoscopic diagnosis of the lesion with submucosal invasion.     

Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic colorectal lesions

OBJECTIVE: Because the medical management of persons with adenomatous colorectal polyps differs from that of those with hyperplastic polyps, accuracy of diagnosis is essential. This study reports our experience using a magnifying colonoscope combined with indigocarmine dye to diagnose colorectal polyps, emphasizing its ability to differentiate neoplastic from nonneoplastic lesions. METHODS: The materials consisted of 175 polyps. A 0.2% indigocarmine solution was sprayed, and the colonoscope zoom apparatus performed a magnified observation after an ordinary colonoscopy identified the lesions. The pit patterns were classified into six categories: I, II, III(L), IIIs, IV, and V according to Kudo's modified classification. RESULTS: The percentages of neoplastic changes in the lesions with pit pattern I, II, III(L), IIIs, IV, and V were 0, 12.2, 69.7, 80, 84.4, and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of neoplastic lesions was 93.8% and specificity was 64.6% when types I and II represented the pit pattern of nonneoplastic lesions and types III(L), IIIs, IV, and V represented neoplastic lesions. The overall diagnostic accuracy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic lesions was 80.1%. The diagnostic accuracy is not influenced by the size and shape of the lesions. The six neoplastic lesions that were misjudged to be nonneoplastic were histologically adenoma with only mild atypia. CONCLUSIONS: The pit pattern analysis of colorectal lesions by magnifying colonoscopy is a useful and objective tool for differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic lesions of the large bowel. In its current state of development, however, this technique is not a substitute for histology.     

A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia

BACKGROUND: Discrimination between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions is crucial in colorectal cancer screening. Application of narrow-band imaging (NBI) in colonoscopy visualises mucosal vascular networks in neoplastic lesions and may improve diagnostic accuracy. AIM: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of NBI in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions with diagnostic efficacies of standard modalities, conventional colonoscopy, and chromoendoscopy. METHODS: In this prospective study, 180 colorectal lesions from 133 patients were observed with conventional colonoscopy, and under low-magnification and high-magnification NBI and chromoendoscopy. Lesions were resected for histopathological analysis. Endoscopic images were stored electronically and randomly allocated to two readers for evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of each endoscopic modality were assessed by reference to histopathology. RESULTS: NBI and chromoendoscopy scored better under high magnification than under low magnification in comparison with conventional colonoscopy. The diagnostic accuracy of NBI with low or high magnification was significantly higher than that of conventional colonoscopy (low magnification: p = 0.0434 for reader 1 and p = 0.004 for reader 2; high magnification: p<0.001 for both readers) and was comparable to that of chromoendoscopy. CONCLUSION: Both low-magnification and high-magnification NBI were capable of distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions; the diagnostic accuracy of NBI was better than that of conventional colonoscopy and equivalent to that of chromoendoscopy. The role of NBI in screening colonoscopy needs further evaluation.     

Magnifying colonoscopy as a non-biopsy technique for differential diagnosis of non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions

AIM: To clarify whether mucosal crypt patterns observed with magnifying colonoscopy are feasible to distinguish non-neoplastic polyps from neoplastic polyps. METHODS: From June 1999 through March 2000, 180 consecutive patients with 210 lesions diagnosed with a magnifying colonoscope (CF-200Z, Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were enrolled. Magnification and chromoendoscopy with 0.2% indigo-carmine dye was applied to each lesion for mucosal crypt observation. Lesions showing typesⅠandⅡcrypt patterns were considered non-neoplastic and examined histologically by biopsy, whereas lesions showing typesⅢtoⅤcrypt patterns were removed endoscopically or surgically. The correlation of endoscopic diagnosis and histologic diagnosis was then investigated. RESULTS: At endoscopy, 24 lesions showed a typeⅠorⅡpit pattern, and 186 lesions showed typeⅢtoⅤpit patterns. With histologic examination, 26 lesions were diagnosed as non-neoplastic polyps, and 184 lesions were diagnosed as neoplastic polyps. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 99.1% (208/210). The sensitivity and specificity were 92.3% (24/26) and 99.8% (184/186), respectively. CONCLUSION: Magnifying colonoscopy could be used as a non-biopsy technique for differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps.     

大肠黏膜表面结构对早期大肠癌及其癌前病变的诊断价值

目的 探讨大肠黏膜病变表面腺管开口分型对早期大肠癌及癌前病变的临床应用价值.方法 应用电子放大内镜结合黏膜染色方法观察了144例患者共162处大肠黏膜病变,并结合病变大体形态特点及病理组织学结果进行分析.结果 162处病变中非肿瘤性病变表现为Ⅰ型及Ⅱ型腺管开口者占76.5%（26/34）;肿瘤性病变表现为Ⅲ、Ⅳ和Ⅴ型腺管开口者占96.1%（123/128）.癌性病变则主要以Ⅴ型腺管开口为主,占75.0%（9/12）,其中3例进展期癌均表现为ⅤN型腺管开口.结论 大肠黏膜腺管开口分型对判断非肿瘤性病变、肿瘤性病变及早期大肠癌具有重要意义,并对临床治疗方式的选择具有指导意义.     

Recent advances in chromoscopic colonoscopy and endomicroscopy

The basic rationale for secondary prevention of colorectal carcinoma is by endoscopic polypectomy. New technologies in the form of high-magnification or "zoom" colonoscopy complemented by chromoscopic agents permit early detection of neoplastic colorectal lesions, particularly flat and depressed types. Detailed morphologic characteristics of the surface crypt or "pit pattern" can be obtained with these techniques, enabling an in vivo "optical biopsy" and staging tool. Establishing suitability for endoscopic resection or surgical excision can be enhanced using these techniques. Furthermore, chromoscopic colonoscopy may have a role in routine endoscopic colorectal cancer surveillance programs in patients at high risk for colorectal neoplasia, such as those with long-standing ulcerative colitis and familial colorectal cancer syndromes. This review summarizes recent data regarding the prevalence and histopathologic characteristics of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in Western cohorts and describes how their detection and management can be improved by chromoscopy and magnification technology. We outline these techniques from a clinical perspective and describe the basic principles of endoscopic mucosal resection.     

Magnifying Endoscopy with Indigo Carmine Contrast for Differential Diagnosis of Neoplastic and Nonneoplastic Colonic Polyps

This study describes the feasibility of magnifying colonoscopy with indigo carmine dye contrast to distinguish neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. This study sampled consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy using an Olympus CF240ZI from January to October 2000 at Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Lin-Kou Medical Center. This study analyzed a total of 270 polyps. Indigo carmine (0.2%) was sprayed directly on the mucosa surface before observing the crypts using a magnifying colonoscope (1.5x-100x). The pit patterns were described using the classification proposed by Kudo. Finally, polypectomy or biopsy was performed for histological diagnosis. The study identified 155 adenomas, 99 hyperplastic polyps, 9 adenocarcinomas, and 7 other nonneoplastic lesions (harmatoma, inflammatory polyps, and mucosal tag). The pit pattern was analyzed for all lesions. Further classification into neoplastic (adenoma and adenocarcinoma) and nonneoplastic (hyperplastic and others) polyps revealed 156 neoplastic and 14 nonneoplastic polyps among the type III to type V pits and 92 nonneoplastic and 8 neoplastic polyps among the type I and II pits. The sensitivity of type III to type V pits in detecting neoplastic polyps was 95.1%, with a specificity of 86.8% and diagnostic accuracy of 91.9%. The positive likelihood ratio was 7.3, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.06. Magnifying colonoscopy with indigo carmine dye contrast provides morphological detail that correlates well with polyp histology. Small flat lesions with typical type II pit pattern should have minimal neoplastic risk, thus endoscopic resection is not necessary.     

High resolution chromoendoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps

BACKGROUND: Magnifying colonoscopy brought the possibility of precise histologic diagnosis of colorectal lesions through their surface appearance. Despite the high accuracy of magnifying colonoscopy it is a specialized and expensive equipment not available in most medical centers. Due to these reasons the use of conventional colonoscopy with chromoscopy has been raised because this produce can reproduce most of the information previously obtained by magnifying colonoscopy. AIM: To determine the role of high resolution colonoscopy and indigo carmine chromoscopy for differential diagnosis between neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions through measurements of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. PATIENTS / METHODS: It was performed a prospective study. Seventy-four colorectal polyps were evaluated in 54 patients. A high resolution Olympus Exera CFQ 160L colonoscope was used. After the identification of the lesions, they were dyed with indigo carmine 0,2% and classified according to Kudo's classification by a single observer. After resection, the polyps were submitted to histopathological examination. RESULTS: The endoscopic findings were compared to histopathologic results. The accuracy of the method was 79,7%, sensibility of 88,8%, specificity of 55%, positive predictive value of 84,2% and a negative predictive value of 64,7%. CONCLUSION: We can conclude that we must be careful to apply high resolution colonoscopy and chromoscopy because adenomatous lesions can be misdiagnosed as non-neoplastic.     

Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps

AIM: To identify the feasibility of the narrow-band imaging (NBI) method compared with that of conventional colonoscopy and chromoendoscopy for distinguishing neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. METHOD: This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy using a conventional colonoscope between January and February 2006 at Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taiwan. These 78 patients had 110 colorectal polyps. During the procedure, conventional colonoscopy first detected lesions, and then the NBI system was used to examine the capillary networks. Thereafter indigo carmine (0.2%) was sprayed directly on the mucosa surface prior to evaluating the crypts using a conventional colonoscope. The pit patterns were characterized using the classification system proposed by Kudo. Finally, a polypectomy or biopsy was performed for histological diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 110 colorectal polyps, 65 were adenomas, 40 were hyperplastic polyps, and five were adenocarcinomas. The NBI system and pit patterns for all lesions were analyzed. For differential diagnosis of neoplastic (adenoma and adenocarcinoma) and nonneoplastic (hyperplastic) polyps, the sensitivity of the conventional colonoscope for detecting neoplastic polyps was 82.9%, specificity was 80.0% and diagnostic accuracy was 81.8%, significantly lower than those achieved with the NBI system (sensitivity 95.7%, specificity 87.5%, accuracy 92.7%) and chromoendoscopy (sensitivity 95.7%, specificity 87.5%, accuracy 92.7%). Therefore, no significant difference existed between the NBI system and chromoendoscopy during differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps. CONCLUSION: The NBI system identified morphological details that correlate well with polyp histology by chromoendoscopy.     

Magnifying colonoscopy: interobserver agreement in the assessment of colonic pit patterns and its correlation with histopathological findings

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Magnifying colonoscopy (MC) is recognized as an aid to the differential diagnosis between neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions. This study evaluated interobserver agreement of experienced endoscopists in the assessment of colonic pit patterns through the Kudo's classification and correlated morphological aspects with histopathological findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 213 magnification chromoendoscopic pictures of colonic lesions were collected from 161 consecutive patients and presented to three independent observers who expressed opinion about predominant pit pattern. All lesions were excised and sent for histopathological study. RESULTS: Kappa statistics showed that the general agreement index with respect to the aspects of the pits was good among the three observers (0.561). Regarding prediction of histopathology according to the pit pattern diagnosis, overall accuracy was 84%, sensitivity was 91.4%, specificity was 67.2%, positive predictive value was 86.6%, and negative predictive value was 79.3%. CONCLUSION: Although the interobserver reproducibility of the colonic pit pattern is good for experienced endoscopists, MC must not be used to replace the histopathological analysis, since it does not differentiate with the necessary safety neoplastic from nonneoplastic lesions.     

Efficacy of magnifying endoscopy in the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps of the large bowel

PURPOSE: We have introduced magnifying colonoscopy into clinical practice and analyzed its diagnostic efficacy, especially regarding the ability to distinguish neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps. METHODS: The materials consisted of 923 polyps. After identifying the lesions during normal colonoscopy, a dye was sprayed, and then the zoom apparatus of the colonoscope was used to make a magnified observation at a maximum 100 times magnification. We classified the crypt orifices into six categories and labeled them A to F as follows: A, a medium round appearance; B, an asteroid appearance; C, an elliptic appearance; D, a small, round appearance; E, a cerebriform appearance; F, no apparent structural appearance. RESULTS: Forty-two of 923 polyps did not reveal any clear images of crypt patterns. The percentage of histologically neoplastic change in the lesions classified as A, B, C, D, E, and F were 10, 15.9, 93.7, 100, 94.8, and 87.5 percent, respectively. When we considered types A and B to represent a crypt pattern of non-neoplastic lesions, and types C, D, E, and F to represent neoplastic lesions, and when the lesions that did not show any clear images were classified as a misjudgment, the diagnostic accuracy of neoplastic lesions (sensitivity) was 92 percent and that of non-neoplastic lesions (specificity) was 73.3 percent. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions was 88.4 percent. Twenty-three neoplastic lesions that were misjudged to be non-neoplastic were histologically adenoma with mild atypia in 22 and adenoma with moderate atypia in 1. CONCLUSION: Magnifying colonoscopy was considered to be useful in determining the indications for colonoscopic removal.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 22 to 26, 1997.     

智能染色内镜诊断结肠病变腺管开口的临床价值及Ang-2表达、MVD值与腺管开口相关性研究

目的探讨FICE放大内镜对结肠瘤性、非瘤性病变的诊断价值以及血管生成素-2（Ang-2）表达、肿瘤微血管密度（MVD）与腺管开口的相互关系。方法选择富士能智能染色内镜（FICE）放大观查判定腺管开口为Ⅰ～Ⅴ型的结肠病变标本（Ⅰ～Ⅴ型各20例）,Ⅰ、Ⅱ型纳入A组,Ⅲ、Ⅳ型纳入B组,Ⅴ型纳入C组。对照病理诊断结果,判断FICE放大内镜对结肠病变的诊断价值。并采用免疫组化SP法分别测定不同腺管开口结肠病变中Ang-2表达情况及MVD值,分析3者间的相互关系。结果FICE放大内镜对非瘤性病变诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为88．0％和92．5％,符合率为90．2％;对瘤性病变诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为94．8％和91．7％,符合率为93．2％;对结肠病变诊断的总符合率为92．0％。结肠病变中Ang-2的阳性表达率和MVD值在A组（Ⅰ、Ⅱ型合并组）、B组（Ⅲ、Ⅳ型合并组）、C组（腺管开口V型）3组逐渐升高。且Ang-2阳性表达组MVD值明显增高。结论FICE放大内镜对结肠病变腺管开口分型的判断可基本准确区别瘤性、非瘤性病变,结肠病变中Ang-2的阳性表达、肿瘤血管的生成与其腺管开口关系密切。     

黏膜表面形态特点对大肠息肉病理类型的预判价值

目的在高清非放大结肠镜下观察大肠息肉表面形态特点,与病理组织学诊断进行对照研究,评价息肉黏膜表面形态特点对大肠息肉病理类型的预判能力。方法对142例结直肠息肉患者330枚息肉样病变进行高清结肠镜检查并观察黏膜腺管开口形态,采用窄波带成像技术(narrow band imaging,NBI)观察黏膜表面血管形态(capillary pattern,CP),与息肉病理结果对照判定其敏感性、特异性及准确率。结果高清非放大结肠镜下联合黏膜腺管开口形态及黏膜表面血管形态判定息肉表面形态特点对鉴别肿瘤性与非肿瘤性病变的敏感性为88.2%,特异性为83.6%,阳性预测值为95.5%,阴性预测值为64.4%,准确度为87.3%,阳性相似比为5.4,阴性相似比为0.1。结论高清非放大结肠镜下贴近观察结合NBI显像观察息肉表面形态对于鉴别大肠息肉是否为肿瘤性有重要价值,与病理诊断有较好的符合率,有助于决定进一步治疗及随访方案。