Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: The presence of perineural invasion on the prostate needle biopsy specimen has been suggested to be an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen (PSA) outcome following radical prostatectomy. We evaluated the clinical use of perineural invasion at biopsy for predicting time to PSA failure following radical prostatectomy after controlling for established prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective evaluation using a Cox regression multivariate analysis of 750 men with clinically localized or PSA detected prostate cancer was performed to evaluate the ability of PSA, biopsy Gleason score, perineural invasion on the needle biopsy specimen and the percent of positive prostate biopsies to predict PSA outcome following radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of perineural invasion on the needle biopsy specimen provided additional information regarding 5-year PSA outcome (82% versus 95%, p = 0.04) for patients who were in the low risk group. This difference in PSA outcome could be explained by higher rates of positive surgical margins (25% versus 17%, p = 0.07). Patients whose prostate needle biopsy contained perineural invasion and who had the corresponding neurovascular bundle resected had a significantly lower positive margin rate (11% versus 100%, p = 0.001) compared to those who had the neurovascular bundle spared. The presence of perineural invasion on biopsy was not a significant predictor of PSA outcome following radical prostatectomy for patients in the intermediate or high risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the neurovascular bundle on the side corresponding to location of perineural invasion on the biopsy may decrease the positive surgical margin rate and improve outcome for low risk patients.     

Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results

PURPOSE: We updated a long-term cancer control outcome in a large anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) series. We also evaluated the perioperative parameters that predict cancer specific outcomes following surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 1983 to February 2003, 1 surgeon (WJC) performed RRP in 3,478 consecutive men. Patients were followed with semiannual serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests and annual digital rectal examinations. We used Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates to calculate actuarial 10-year probabilities of biochemical progression-free survival, cancer specific survival and overall survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine independent perioperative predictors of cancer progression. RESULTS: At a mean followup of 65 months (range 0 to 233) actuarial 10-year biochemical progression-free, cancer specific and overall survival probabilities were 68%, 97% and 83%, respectively. On multivariate analysis biochemical progression-free survival probability was significantly associated with preoperative PSA, clinical tumor stage, Gleason sum, pathological stage and treatment era. Cancer specific survival and overall survival rates were also significantly associated with clinicopathological parameters. CONCLUSIONS: RRP can be performed with excellent survival outcomes. Favorable clinicopathological parameters and treatment in the PSA era are associated with improved cancer control.     

A continence index predicts the early return of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We evaluated the ability of a newly developed continence index to predict the return of urinary continence 3 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed and used a continence index to determine continence level after removal of the urinary catheter on postoperative day 15 in 145 men. A total of 20 patients were evaluated independently by 2 nurse specialists to assess continence index reliability. We evaluated continence level, pad use and degree of bothersomeness due to incontinence 3 months after catheter removal. The association of continence score with outcome variables was calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel trend test and the predictive ability of the continence score was determined by logistic regression to produce cumulative odds ratios. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.995 for the independently assessed continence index ratings and the Cronbach coefficient alpha was 0.65 for the 5 continence index parameters. Complete continence or continence with heavy activity but not always was achieved by 96%, 85% and 68% of the men in tertiles 1 (continence score 18), 2 (continence score 15 to 17) and 3 (continence score 14 or less), respectively. The cumulative odds ratio of 2.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9 to 4. 6) per tertile indicated a 2.9-fold increased chance of incontinence for each successively lower tertile. In addition, 96%, 82% and 68% of the men in tertiles 1 to 3, respectively, required no or 1 small pad daily. The cumulative odds ratio for pad use was 2.3 (95% CI 1.5 to 3.5) per tertile. Of the patients in tertiles 1 to 3 100%, 97% and 80%, respectively, had no or slight bothersomeness due to urinary incontinence. The cumulative odds ratio for bothersomeness level was 2.7 (95% CI 1.7 to 4.3) per tertile. The Mantel-Haenszel trend test showed a significant association of continence score with all 3 outcome variables (p < or =0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our continence index is a simple and reliable instrument that provides useful prognostic information on the early return of continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy.     

Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized, high risk prostate cancer: critical analysis of risk assessment methods

PURPOSE: Standardized criteria are lacking to define high risk, clinically localized prostate cancer before definitive treatment. Reliance on simple risk stratification schemes to define high risk cancers has led many physicians and patients toward therapeutic nihilism, inappropriately selecting androgen deprivation instead of definitive local therapy. Of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy we identified those at high risk based on 8 previously described definitions. We examined pathological characteristics and prostate specific antigen outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included 4,708 men treated with radical prostatectomy alone between 1985 and 2004. Estimates of prostate specific antigen relapse for patients at high risk were generated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the HR for recurrence in high risk vs nonhigh risk cohorts. RESULTS: Depending on the definition used patients at high risk composed 3% to 38% of the study population. The proportion of patients with extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node metastasis among men with high risk cancer was 35% to 71%, 10% to 33% and 7% to 23%, respectively. Of the high risk tumors 22% to 63% proved to be confined to the prostate pathologically. While patients at high risk had a 1.8 to 4.8-fold increased hazard of prostate specific antigen relapse, their 5-year relapse-free probability after radical prostatectomy alone was 49% (95% CI 39 to 58) to 80% (95% CI 77 to 83). Of patients at high risk who had relapse 25% across all definitions experienced relapse more than 2 years after surgery and in 26% to 39% prostate specific antigen doubling time at recurrence was 10 months or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with high risk cancer by currently available definitions do not have a uniformly poor prognosis after radical prostatectomy. Many cancers classified clinically as high risk are actually confined to the prostate pathologically. The risk of extraprostatic disease and prostate specific antigen relapse varies greatly depending on the definition used.     

Delay of radical prostatectomy and risk of biochemical progression in men with low risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer are faced with multiple treatment options. Understanding these options and their associated side effects, and making a decision often requires time, resulting in a delay before receiving treatment. This is particularly pertinent in men with low risk disease who may be considered candidates for watchful waiting and, thus, may not experience strong pressure to undergo treatment promptly. Whether delays and especially prolonged delays, eg greater than 180 days, before RP negatively impact the disease outcome is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the association between time from diagnosis to surgery, and pathological features of the RP specimen and risk of biochemical progression in 895 men with low risk prostate cancer (prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml and biopsy Gleason sum 6 or less) treated with RP between 1988 and 2004 in the Shared-Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital Database using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards, respectively. RESULTS: Time from biopsy to surgery was not significantly related to high grade disease in the RP specimen, positive surgical margins or extraprostatic extension (all p-trend >0.05). After adjustment for multiple clinical covariates a longer time from biopsy to surgery was significantly associated with an increased risk of biochemical progression (p-trend = 0.002). However, this increased risk of progression was only apparent in men with delays greater than 180 days (median 263, vs 90 or fewer days RR 2.73, 95% CI 1.51 to 4.94). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that patients with low risk prostate cancer can be reassured that immediate treatment is not necessary. Whether long delays (greater than 180 days) decrease the likelihood of curability in some patients requires further study.     

Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen remains a significant prognostic variable in predicting biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: Multiple investigators have argued that PSA may no longer be an accurate marker of prostate cancer biology. We determined whether the impact of PSA in predicting biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy has changed since the beginning of the PSA era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,246 patients were identified from the Columbia University Comprehensive Urological Oncology Database who underwent radical prostatectomy by 1 of 3 surgeons between 1988 and 2003. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to the data to estimate the impact of PSA (logPSA) in predicting BCF (PSA 0.2 ng/ml or greater). To determine if the predictive impact of PSA changed over time, patients were classified based on year of surgery, and an interaction term between PSA and time was included. Finally concordance indexes were estimated to determine if the predictive ability of PSA has changed over time. RESULTS: In a Cox model including PSA, year of surgery and a year/PSA interaction term, the impact of PSA appears to change over time (p = 0.002). However, when correcting for the effects of stage and grade there was no significant change in the impact of PSA. In addition, concordance analysis indicated that the predictive ability of PSA has remained constant throughout the PSA era (0.65, 0.66 and 0.64 for each period, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the predictive ability of PSA as a cancer outcomes biomarker has not changed significantly since the beginning of the PSA era. Despite suggestions to the contrary, PSA remains an important variable in predicting risk of BCF after RP.     

Obesity and risk of biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy at a tertiary care referral center

PURPOSE: We have previously reported that obesity is an independent predictor of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy (RP) in men treated by a single surgeon at our institution. We sought to validate or refute these findings using data on men treated by multiple other surgeons at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 2,796 men treated with anatomical radical RP between 1988 and 2004 by 1 of 17 surgeons at our institution, a tertiary care referral center. We evaluated the association between body mass index (BMI), and adverse pathological features and biochemical progression. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis increased BMI was associated with high grade disease in the RP specimen (p = 0.03), positive surgical margins (p <0.001), extraprostatic extension (p <0.001) and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.01) but not with seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.59). After multivariate adjustment for preoperative clinical characteristics increased BMI was significantly associated with an increased risk of biochemical progression (p <0.001), which was somewhat but not completely attenuated by further adjusting for RP specimen pathological features (p = 0.03). Adjustment for surgeon did not affect these results. CONCLUSIONS: In men undergoing RP increased BMI was associated with adverse pathological features and a greater risk of biochemical progression. These findings together with the results of several recently published series collectively provide strong evidence that obese men undergoing RP are more likely to have aggressive prostate cancer.     

Baseline prostatic specific antigen does not predict the outcome of high energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy

PURPOSE: We assessed the prognostic value of baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) for outcome after high energy transurethral thermotherapy in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively in 404 consecutive patients treated with high energy transurethral thermotherapy with the Prostatron device (EDAP-Technomed, Lyon, France). Patients were followed a minimum of 1 year. At baseline certain criteria were assessed, including pretreatment PSA, uroflowmetry, ultrasound measurement of prostatic volume, voided and post-void residual urine volume, and International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) and quality of life scores. Outcome assessment included I-PSS, quality of life score and uroflowmetry of peak urine flow. Linear regression analyses were performed to correlate baseline PSA with improved clinical parameters at 12 months of followup. Logistic regression analyses and receiver operating characteristics curves characterized the ability of baseline PSA to discriminate patients with a more or less favorable outcome. RESULTS: An evident linear association was identified for prostate size at baseline and PSA. After 1 year 36 patients were treated again due to transurethral thermotherapy failure and 16 had died, which was not related to lower urinary tract symptoms or treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms. To include re-treated patients in the analyses we considered that their I-PSS, quality of life and peak urine flow values at 1 year were unchanged compared with baseline. Of the 388 evaluable patients an improvement of 50% or more in I-PSS, quality of life and peak urine flow was observed in 57%, 62% and 44%, respectively. Absolute mean changes at 1 year were -9.7, -2 and 5.2 ml. per second for I-PSS, quality of life and peak urine flow, respectively. Neither linear nor logistic regression analysis showed any clinically relevant correlation between baseline PSA and changes in I-PSS (r = -0.004), quality of life (r = -0.135) or peak urine flow (r = 0.105) at 1 year. Receiver operating characteristics curves failed to distinguish more or less favorable outcomes in all evaluated parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment PSA cannot predict the clinical outcome after high energy transurethral thermotherapy.     

Adverse prognostic significance of capsular incision with radical retropubic prostatectomy

PURPOSE: The prognostic significance of capsular incision (CPI) at radical retropubic prostatectomy remains to be defined. To evaluate this we compared prostate specific antigen recurrence for with CPI to that with established pathological groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1998 to December 2000, 409 men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy at our medical center. CPI was defined as a positive posterior, lateral or posterolateral surgical margin without documented extraprostatic extension (EPE). Excluding patients with preoperative androgen ablation, positive lymph nodes or seminal vesicle involvement there were 129 with organ confined disease and negative surgical margins (pT2/-M), 18 with CPI, 29 with EPE and negative surgical margins (pT3a/-M), and 24 with EPE and positive surgical margins (pT3a/+M). We compared time to biochemical recurrence among these 4 groups using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to determine the HR of CPI vs the other groups, while controlling for age, prostate specific antigen, tumor volume and Gleason score. RESULTS: The 3-year likelihood of freedom from biochemical recurrence in the CPI group was 65%, for pT2/-M it was 96%, for pT3a/-M it was 91% and for pT3a/+M it was 58%. The adjusted HR with the 95% CI showed that the risk of biochemical recurrence with CPI was 8.4 times higher than that with pT2/-M (p = 0.002), 5.9 times higher than that with pT3a/-M (p = 0.046) and the same as that with pT3a/+M (p = 0.840). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated posterior, lateral and posterolateral CPI by our definition occurs not uncommonly and it may represent true incision of the capsule and/or difficulty in diagnosing EPE due to a lack of extraprostatic tissue in the surgical specimen. However, the prognostic significance of CPI as defined appears similar to that of pT3a with positive margins.     

Under staging and under grading in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: results from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database

PURPOSE: We determined the prevalence of under staging and under grading in contemporary patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in academic and community based urology practices, and defined important predictors of under staging in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared clinical T stage and biopsy Gleason score with pathological T stage and prostatectomy Gleason score in 1,313 patients enrolled in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database, a longitudinal registry of patients with prostate cancer, who underwent radical prostatectomy, including 53% since 1995. Under grading was determined for the primary and secondary Gleason patterns and defined as a biopsy Gleason pattern of 1 to 3 that became pathological Gleason pattern 4 or 5. Under staging was defined as a clinically organ confined tumor that was extraprostatic stages pT3 to 4 or N+ at radical prostatectomy. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine important risk factors for under staging and significant risk factors were used to identify the likelihood of under staging in clinically relevant patient subgroups. The importance of the percent of positive biopsies in regard to the likelihood of under staging was determined by assigning patients to previously described risk groups based on serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis and biopsy Gleason score. RESULTS: Under grading of primary and secondary Gleason patterns occurred in 13% and 29% of patients, respectively, while under staging occurred in 24%. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that PSA at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason score and the percent of positive biopsies were significant predictors of under staging. The percent of positive biopsies appeared to be most important for predicting the likelihood of extraprostatic disease extension in intermediate or high risk disease based on serum PSA at diagnosis and biopsy Gleason grade. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of under grading and under staging in contemporary patients undergoing radical prostatectomy may be lower than previously reported. PSA at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason score and the percent of positive biopsies are important predictors of under staging. The percent of positive biopsies should be incorporated into risk assessment models of newly diagnosed prostate cancer.     

Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score

PURPOSE: Previous studies have suggested that prostate specific antigen (PSA) density is a significant independent predictor of biochemical failure after primary therapy. We determined whether pathological PSA density using surgical weight of the radical prostatectomy specimen was an independent predictor of adverse pathological features or biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We also examined whether combining pathological PSA density with biopsy Gleason score improved risk stratification compared with serum PSA and biopsy Gleason score for predicting PSA recurrence after prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multivariate analysis was used to determine whether pathological PSA density was an independent predictor of adverse pathology or PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy in 325 patients treated at a Veterans Affairs medical center. Cutoff points of pathological PSA density were generated to identify patients at various risks for biochemical recurrence. These cutoffs were combined with biopsy Gleason cutoff points 2 to 6, 7 and 8 to 10 to generate a risk stratification system that was compared with a previous risk stratification system using PSA and biopsy Gleason score cutoff points. The validity of the risk stratification system using pathological PSA density and biopsy Gleason score was evaluated in another cohort of 490 patients treated with radical prostatectomy at a tertiary care medical center. RESULTS: Pathological PSA density was an independent predictor of positive surgical margins (p <0.001), nonorgan confined disease (p <0.001), seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.003) and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (p <0.001). The cutoff points for pathological PSA density of less than 0.3, 0.3 to 0.7 and greater than 0.7 ng./ml./gm. separated patients into 3 distinct groups at increasing risk for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (p <0.001). Pathological PSA density cutoffs combined with biopsy Gleason score cutoffs 2 to 6, 7 and 8 to 10 provided better risk stratification for biochemical failure than cutoffs based on a combination of PSA and biopsy Gleason score in patients treated at the Veterans Affairs (hazards ratio 3.04, confidence interval 2.25 to 4.11, p <0.001) and tertiary care (hazards ratio 2.38, confidence interval 1.78 to 3.18, p <0.001) medical centers. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological PSA density was a strong predictor of advanced pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Pathological PSA density combined with biopsy Gleason score defined a novel risk group system that improved risk stratification compared with a combination of PSA and biopsy Gleason score. These results were validated in another cohort of patients treated with radical prostatectomy at a tertiary care medical center. Further studies are required using PSA density values calculated from preoperative transrectal ultrasound measurements to determine whether a combination of PSA density and biopsy Gleason score provides significant pretreatment risk stratification.     

The role of early adopter bias for new technologies in robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

PURPOSE: We determined the potential influence of an early adopter bias in patients undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared baseline demographic, clinical and health related quality of life characteristics of patients undergoing 3 different surgical procedures for clinically localized prostate cancer following the introduction of robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy at our institution. Patients included in this analysis were participating in a prospective health related quality of life study using the SF-12(R) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Of 402 patients 159 (39%) underwent robot assisted laparoscopic, 144 (36%) underwent radical perineal and 99 (25%) underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. There were no statistically significant associations between procedure type and patient age (p = 0.267), race (p = 0.725), number of medical comorbidities (p = 0.490), income (p = 0.056) and level of education (p = 0.495). Mean prostate specific antigen was 5.9 +/- 3.3, 7.3 +/- 5.5 and 5.7 +/- 5.0 ng/ml for robot assisted laparoscopic, radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy, respectively (p = 0.030). The proportion of robot assisted laparoscopic, radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy patients with a final Gleason score of 4-6 was 55%, 45% and 39%, respectively (p = 0.037). The proportion of robot assisted laparoscopic, radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy patients with stage T2 disease was 91%, 68% and 80%, respectively (p = 0.001). Statistically significant associations of higher income and education with higher baseline health related quality of life scores were seen in the sexual and physical domains (each p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We failed to find evidence of an early adopter bias for patients undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Nevertheless, observational studies comparing robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy to radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy should account carefully for patient baseline characteristics to allow meaningful comparisons of surgical outcomes.     

Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location

PURPOSE: The significance of isolated positive apical surgical margins in radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) specimens remains controversial. We examine the effects of margin status and location on biochemical recurrence rates in patients undergoing RRP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 800 patients with RRP we identified 498 without pathological evidence of lymph node, seminal vesicle or adjacent organ involvement and with at least 6 months of followup. Patients were subdivided into apex only positive (AM+), nonapical isolated positive (OM+), multiple positive (MM+) and negative (SM-) surgical margins. The rate and interval to biochemical disease recurrence were determined in each group. Univariate and multivariate analysis as well as Kaplan-Meier curves were used to test differences among these groups. RESULTS: Of the 498 men who met our inclusion criteria 400 were SM-, 28 were AM+, 57 were OM+ and 13 were MM+ at a median followup of 49, 59, 64 and 83 months, respectively. Biochemical recurrence rates for SM-, AM+, OM+ and MM+ were 9.3%, 21.4%, 26.3% and 30.8%, respectively. Median time to biochemical failure in the SM-, AM+, OM+ and MM+ groups was 34, 19.5, 46.0 and 6.8 months, respectively. Biochemical recurrence was not statistically different among the AM+, OM+ and MM+ groups. On univariate analysis AM+, OM+ and MM+ were significant predictors of recurrence (p < 0.05, < 0.005, and <0.05, respectively). On multivariate models only pretreatment prostate specific antigen and OM+ were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: A positive surgical margin conveys increased risk for biochemical recurrence. Patients with AM+ experienced biochemical recurrence more frequently and rapidly than those with SM-. AM+ conveys a similar risk of recurrence compared with OM+ and MM+. Apical margin status did not independently predict biochemical recurrence.     

Treatment outcome by risk group after radical prostatectomy in Japanese men

BACKGROUND: North American investigators have suggested the usefulness of risk-group stratification based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage and biopsy Gleason score for predicting the biochemical outcome of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. There have been no reports of the application of this stratification to early biochemical outcome after radical surgery in Japanese men. METHODS: The study population consisted of 178 men treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection at Kitasato University Hospital (n = 110) and Kurashiki Central Hospital (n = 68) between October 1992 and May 1999. Pathologic and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy were analyzed based on risk-group stratification. Risk groups were further analyzed according to detailed pathologic findings at biopsy. RESULTS: The median follow-up period for the 178 patients after radical surgery was 41.5 months (range, 2.0--82.0 months; mean, 40.9 months). Fifty-eight patients experienced PSA failure at a median of 8.0 months following surgery (range, 0.0--58.0). Risk-group stratification distinctly defined groups of pathologic findings in the radical prostatectomy specimens. The proportion of patients with PSA failure for low, intermediate and high-risk groups were 9.5%, 23.9% and 56.9%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Use of the number of cores with cancer and maximum cancer length in biopsy cores failed to improve risk stratification for PSA outcome in all risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Risk-group stratification based on preoperative variables may significantly improve a physician's ability to counsel patients about PSA outcome after radical prostatectomy. Further improvement in risk stratification may call for use of variables other than the pathologic information in biopsy cores.