Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for complete-coverage restorations.

This clinical trial assessed the ability of Gluma Dentin Bond to inhibit dentinal sensitivity in teeth prepared to receive complete cast restorations. Twenty patients provided 76 teeth for the study. Following tooth preparation, dentinal surfaces were coated with either sterile water (control) or two 30-second applications of Gluma Dentin Bond (test) on either intact or removed smear layers. Patients were recalled after 14 days for a test of sensitivity of the prepared dentin to compressed air, osmotic stimulus (saturated CaCl2 solution), and tactile stimulation via a scratch test under controlled loads. A significantly lower number of teeth responded to the test stimuli for both Gluma groups when compared to the controls (P less than .01). No difference was noted between teeth with smear layers intact or removed prior to treatment with Gluma.     

三种脱敏剂对全酸蚀粘结剂牙本质粘结强度和界面形态的影响

目的:研究、比较三种脱敏剂对全酸蚀粘结剂牙本质粘结强度及其粘结界面形态的影响。方法:选择12个无龋损离体人磨牙,磨除牙合面釉质,用600目碳化硅砂纸在流水下预备出有统一玷污层的牙本质粘结面后,随机分为4组,分别用去离子水(对照组)和3种脱敏剂(Hybrid Coat、Gluma、极固宁)进行脱敏处理后,应用Single Bond 2在面粘结4 mm树脂。然后将每个牙垂直于粘结面切割出12个1.0 mm×1.0 mm×4.0 mm的粘结试件,分别在SEM下观察其粘结界面微观形态并进行微拉伸强度(μTBS)测试。结果:HybridCoat组粘结强度最高((14.81±3.87)MPa,随后依次为去离子水组(13.39±4.67)MPa、Gluma组(12.76±2.96)MPa和极固宁组(10.48±4.32)MPa,各组间两两比较,极固宁组明显低于其他3组(P﹤0.05),其他3组间相比均无显著性差异(P﹥0.05);Hybrid Coat组形成的树脂突大部分>35μm,长而密集;Gluma组形成的树脂突长7～35μm;极固宁组形成的树脂突长20～35μm,较稀疏。结论:Hybrid Coat和Gluma对全酸蚀粘结剂牙本质粘结强度无明显影响,而极固宁则明显降低其粘结强度。     

Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of smear layers on the tensile bond strength to human dentin. Bond strength was determined on dumbbell-shaped specimens to determine the feasibility for clinical use of a self-etching primer. METHODS: The dentin of extracted human teeth was exposed by grinding with either #180 or #600 abrasive paper. A self-etching primer was then applied to the prepared dentinal surfaces and left undisturbed for 30s. It was then air-dried and a photocured bonding agent applied and irradiated for 20s. A composite resin was then added to the primed dentin and light-cured for 60s to complete the bonded assemblies. Mini-dumbbell specimens (3.0 x 2.0 mm2) were prepared from the bonded samples. These specimens were stored in 37 degrees C water for 24h before tensile loading to failure at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. Surfaces of fractured specimens, both resin and dentin, were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: Significantly different tensile bond strengths (TBS) of 10.0+/-7.2 and 28.5+/-5.2MPa were found for #180- and #600-prepared dentin, respectively (p<0.01). The former specimens fractured within the hybridized, relatively coarse smear layer, while the latter demonstrated adhesive failure between the composite resin and an attached PMMA rod, not between the dentin and applied adhesive agent. SIGNIFICANCE: The presence and quality of a smear layer yields significantly different bond strengths to prepared human dentin, in vitro. However, a TBS of 10+/-7MPa is evidently adequate, since self-etching primers have been well accepted in dental clinics.     

Effect of smear layer characteristics on dentin bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step self-etch adhesives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of smear layer characteristics on the dentin bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step self-etch adhesives. Xeno V (XV; HEMA-free), G BOND PLUS (GB; HEMA-free) and Clearfil S(3 )Bond (S(3); HEMA-containing), were applied to dentin surfaces prepared with either #180- or #600-grit SiC paper according to manufacturers' instructions. Bond strengths to dentin were determined using μTBS test after 24-hour, 6-month, and 1-year water storage. In addition, nanoleakage evaluation was performed using an SEM. The smear layer characteristics affected water-tree nanoleakage formation in the adhesive layers of XV and GB, which contributed to a reduction in μTBS after 6-month water storage, while the characteristics did not affect the μTBS of S(3). However, regardless of the smear layer characteristics, 1-year water storage significantly reduced the μTBS of all the adhesives and was associated with an increase in failures at the adhesive-composite interface.     

Effect of air-drying dentin surfaces on dentin bond strength of a solvent-free one-step adhesive

The purpose was to evaluate the effect of air-drying dentin surfaces on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a solvent-free onestep adhesive (Bond 1 SF). Twelve human molars were ground with 600-grit SiC paper. Before applying bonding agent, the dentin surface was rinsed with distilled water and blot-dried with tissue paper, followed by air-drying for 0, 3, 30, and 60 s using with a dental air syringe. After applying and curing Bond 1 SF, resin composite was incrementally built up. Specimens were then stored in distilled water for 24 h and then μTBSs were measured at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Higher μTBS were observed when the dentin surface was air-dried for 3 s (33.2±6.8MPa)>0 s (26.7±4.5MPa)>30 s (22.6±5.5MPa)=60 s (20.4±5.0MPa). The results suggested that prolonged air-drying of the dentin surface removed water and decreased the bond strengths of Bond 1 SF.     

Dentin smear layer: an asset or a liability for bonding?

Despite concerns and claims that the smear layer on dentin is undesirable for bonding, supportive evidence is lacking. The clinical efficacy of various agents for smear layer removal and the effect of smear layer removal on the bond strengths of a glass-ionomer cement and three representative dentin bonding agents were examined. For all but one dentin bonding agent (Gluma), a 15-second treatment with 17% EDTA caused a reduction in bond strength. For Gluma, no significant bond was obtained without EDTA treatment. While Gluma probably bonds via dentinal collagen, the other materials interact primarily with dentinal calcium. Removal of the smear layer for adhesives reliant on the presence of calcium is therefore undesirable. The clinical effects of some agents proposed for smear layer removal were examined by SEM of replicas.     

Effects of chemical pretreatments on dentin bonding

The aim of this study was to evaluate several chemical pretreatments on the shear bond strength of three dentin bonding agents (DBAs) and to try to correlate dentin morphology with bond strength using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The DBAs tested were: Gluma Primer in association with Scotchbond DC, Scotchbond DC alone and Clearfil New Bond. Bond strengths of Scotchbond DC and Clearfil New Bond were not significantly modified or reduced by acidic dentin pretreatments. Gluma/Scotchbond adhesion was increased by several treatments but only maleic acid treatment produced shear bond strengths significantly higher than EDTA treatment. SEM evaluation of dentin treatments revealed a wide variety of morphological changes in the dentin surface with partial and complete removal of smear layer by acidic solutions, and only minor modification by amino acid solutions. Only maleic acid was capable of the complete removal of the smear layer and smear plugs coupled with extensive exposure of dentin collagen fibrils.     

Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentine

Objectives: The demand for restoration of root dentine defects such as cervical erosion and root caries has significantly increased recently, but there is limited information on the performance of the adhesive resins to radicular dentine. The purpose of this study was to measure the regional tensile bond strength (TBS) of composite bonded to human root and coronal dentine, and to observe the interface between resin and root dentine by SEM.

Methods: Human extracted cuspid teeth were used to measure TBS with a new microtensile bond test. Enamel and cementum were removed from the labial tooth surfaces to form a long cavity preparation into dentine from the mid-crown to the apex of the root within the same tooth. All Bond 2 (all etch technique) or Imperva Bond (no etch) was bonded to dentine surfaces and covered with Protect Liner resin composite. The resin-bonded teeth were serially sliced into 16 sections at right angles to the long axis of the tooth, and the bonded surfaces were trimmed to give a bonded surface area of 1 mm² for TBS testing.

Results: All Bond 2 bond strengths to coronal and apical dentine showed high values (23.5 MPa) but the bond strength was significantly lower on cervical root dentine. Imperva Bond produced a relatively high tensile bond strength to all regional areas. SEM showed that the thickness of the resin-infiltrated layer formed by All Bond 2 in root dentine was less than coronal areas. Resin infiltration with Imperva Bond was always less than 0.5 μm. The results suggest that high TBS values can be obtained with minimal resin infiltration in root dentine.     

Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of four total-etch adhesives [Excite (EB), Prime&Bond NT (PBNT), Single Bond (SB), and One Coat Bond (OCB)] by comparing them to five self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB), Xeno III (X III), Prompt L-Pop (PLP), AQ Bond (AQB), and Tyrian/One Step plus (TOSP)] at different dentinal areas. In addition the interface between the adhesive resins and dentin was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Superficial occlusal dentin of extracted human molars was exposed and finished with wet 800-grit silicon carbide paper. A block of composite resin was then bonded to the molar samples with the above adhesives according to the manufacturers' instructions. After 24 hours in water at 37 degrees C, the specimens were sectioned into 1 mm thick slices and divided into two regional subgroups according to their relationship to pulp tissue using visual criteria: pulp center and pulp periphery. The slices were then trimmed for the microtensile bond test and subjected to a tensile force and crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Two-way analysis of variance was performed for statistical analyses. In addition the bond strengths for nine adhesive systems for each dentinal area were compared using the Post-Hoc test. The resin-dentin interfaces for each adhesive system were observed under a SEM. RESULTS: Mean mu TBS ranged from (25.2 MPa) for TOSP to (48.9 MPa) for PBNT. The bond strengths of total-etch adhesive systems were not significantly different, and were higher than self-etch adhesive systems, except for CSEB (p<0.05). No significant regional difference was observed for all of the nine adhesive systems (p>0.05). SEM observation showed there is not a standard hybridization for adhesive systems. CONCLUSION: Different dentinal areas may not exhibit as great an influence on bond strengths using new adhesive systems.     

The effect of a desensitizer and CO2 laser irradiation on bond performance between eroded dentin and resin composite

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to evaluate effect of the desensitizing pretreatments on the micro-tensile bond strengths (µTBS) to eroded dentin and sound dentin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two extracted molars were prepared to form a flat dentin surface, and then they were divided into two groups. Group I was stored in distilled water while group II was subjected to a pH cycling. Each group was then subdivided into three subgroups according to desensitizing pretreatment used: a) pretreatment with desensitizer (Gluma); b) pretreatment with CO₂ Laser (Ultra Dream Pluse); c) without any pretreatment. All prepared surfaces were bonded with Single Bond 2 and built up with resin composite (Filtek Z250). The micro-tensile bond test was performed. Fracture modes were evaluated by stereomicroscopy. Pretreated surfaces and bonded interfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data obtained was analyzed by two-way ANOVA (α=0.05).

RESULTS

For both sound and eroded dentin, samples treated with desensitizer showed the greatest µTBS, followed by samples without any treatment. And samples treated with CO₂ laser showed the lowest µTBS. SEM study indicated that teeth with eroded dentin appeared prone to debonding, as demonstrated by existence of large gaps between adhesive layers and dentin.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment with Gluma increased the µTBS of Single Bond 2 for eroded and sound teeth. CO₂ laser irradiation weakened bond performance for sound teeth but had no effect on eroded teeth.     

Shear bond strength of Dicor using resin adhesive systems and light activated cement

A laboratory study was conducted to determine the shear bond strength to dentin of etched and silane-treated Dicor castable ceramic glass using a resin cement and newer generation adhesive systems. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examinations were also completed to evaluate the failure sites. The mean shear bond strength of the control (resin cement only, no adhesive system) was 2.1 +/- 1.2 MPa. The shear bond strength values determined for the adhesive systems and resin cement are as follows: Prisma Universal Bond 2, 18.7 +/- 2.9; XR Primer/XR Bond, 16.9 +/- 6.4; Scotchbond 2, 15.8 +/- 6.2; Tenure Solution, 15.4 +/- 4.5; and Gluma, 14.8 +/- 5.5 MPa. SEM examinations of the debonded specimens attached with Prisma Universal Bond 2 and Tenure Solution showed a complex failure pattern with cohesive failure in the glass ceramic material and adhesive failure between the resin cement and the etched and silane-treated glass surface. The debonding pattern of specimens attached with XR Primer/XR Bond, Scotchbond 2 and Gluma were primarily adhesive between the dentin and resin materials. The results of this study support the use of an adhesive system in conjunction with a resin cement for placement of Dicor castable ceramic restorations.     

Effect of dentinal surface preparation on bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dentin surface treatments on the tensile bond strength (TBS) of the self-etching primer Clearfil SE Bond (CSE) and the one-step self-etching One-Up Bond F (OUB). The exposed flat dentin surfaces of twenty-four sound third molars were prepared with diamond bur at high-speed, carbide bur at low-speed or wet ground with #600 grit SiC paper. The adhesive systems were applied to the dentin surfaces and light-cured according to the manufacturers' instructions. A 6-mm high composite crown was incrementally built-up and each increment was light-cured for 40 seconds. After being stored in water (37 degrees C/24 h), the samples were serially sectioned parallel to the long axis, forming beams (n = 20) with a cross-sectional area of approximately 0.8 mm(2). The specimens were tested in a Universal Testing Machine at 0.5 mm/min. The cross-sectional area was measured and the results (MPa) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey Test (p < 0.05). Overall, the groups treated with CSE exhibited the highest TBS for all surface treatments. Dentin surfaces prepared with carbide bur at low speed reduced TBS in the CSE group; however, OUB was not affected by surface treatments. The effect of surface abrasive methods on TBS was material-dependent.     

Dentin thickness, hardness, and Ca-concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives.

The relationship between the tensile bond strength (TBS) and three dentin characteristics: remaining dentin thickness (RDT), Ca-concentration, and hardness, were investigated. Sixty-two extracted bovine incisors, divided into four groups, were prepared using 600-grit SiC paper to create flat dentinal surfaces. The materials tested in this study consisted of three commercially available and one experimental dentin bonding systems. The TBS and modes of failure were determined after storage for 24 h in 37 degrees C water. Then RDT, Ca-concentration, and hardness were measured. Data were statistically compared with TBS of each group. The mean bond strength of the commercial materials ranged from 2.5 +/- 0.9 MPa to 7.7 +/- 2.8 MPa. Correlations with Ca-concentration and RDT varied, depending on the product. The bond strength of the experimental material was 9.2 +/- 4.4 MPa and significantly correlated with RDT and hardness. With two of the dentin bonding agents, specimens showed a high number of cohesive fractures in dentin, 40% to 82%. It was concluded that the variability of TBS was influenced by dentinal characteristics in three of the four materials tested.     

Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Remnants of the provisional cement on prepared teeth may have an adverse effect on the performance of the definitive luting agent. PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the effect of different dentin cleansing techniques on the bond strength of a resin luting agent and dentin wetting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty buccal or lingual coronal portions of human molar teeth were mounted, with the buccal or lingual surfaces up, in acrylic resin blocks. The specimens were prepared until the dentin was exposed and a eugenol-containing provisional cement (Temp Bond) was applied to the dentin surfaces. After mechanical removal of the cement with a carving instrument, specimens were divided into 6 groups of 10 specimens each. The dentin surfaces of the specimens were treated with 1 of 5 cleansing techniques: Group S, cleansing agent (Sikko Tim); Group C, cleansing agent (Cavity Cleanser); Group O, rotary instrumentation (OptiClean); Group OS, rotary instrument preceding Sikko Tim; and Group OC, rotary instrumentation preceding Cavity Cleanser. The remaning 10 specimens were untreated and served as controls (CT). An adhesive resin luting agent (Variolink II) was applied to all specimens. Shear bond strength (MPa) was measured using a universal testing machine at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. To measure the contact angle, another 6 groups (n=5) were prepared using the same methods. Contact angle measurements were performed to assess wettability using the Axisymmetric Drop Shape Analysis-Contact Diameter (ADSA-CD) technique. Wettability measurements were made with water. Data were statistically analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance with Tukey HSD tests (alpha=.05). The effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on removing the provisional cement from the dentin surface was examined with scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: Specimens cleaned with all techniques showed stronger shear bond strength values than control specimens (P<.001), with the exception of C specimens. The surface cleansing techniques tested affected the dentin wetting significantly in comparison with the control group (P<.001), except for the C and the O groups. There was no significant difference in wetting between the groups C and O. The SEM observations demonstrated that the dentin cleansing techniques left differing amounts of provisional cement remnants. CONCLUSION: Specimens treated with only the cleansing agent Sikko Tim showed the highest bond strength, likely due to the solvent effect of Sikko Tim on the removal of provisional cement. The lowest bond strength was obtained with the rotary instrument. It was concluded that the provisional cement could plug the dentinal tubules into which the resin luting agent penetrates.     

Effect of fluoride application on tensile bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to demineralized dentin

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: It has been reported that the bond strength of composite to demineralized dentin is lower than that to sound dentin. This can be a problem in the success of so-called sealed restorations. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fluoride application on the tensile bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to demineralized dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred twenty extracted bovine incisors were ground flat with 600-grit silicone carbide paper. Ninety teeth were then immersed in acetate buffer (pH 4.0) to form demineralized dentin. These teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups of 30 each: surfaces treated with fluoride solution (Group NF), surfaces treated with fluoride solution followed by a water rinse (Group RF), and control surfaces with no pretreatment (Group C). The remaining 30 teeth comprised a group with normal dentin surfaces (Group S). Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups of 10 each to test the bond strength test of Clearfil SE Bond, Unifil Bond, and Mac-Bond II. Tensile bond strengths (in MPa) were measured with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Mean bond strengths were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD (P =.05). SEM observations of the surfaces before and after priming and at resin-dentin interfaces in each group were performed. Elemental analysis of the dentin surfaces before priming was also carried out. RESULTS: The bond strengths of the adhesives to demineralized dentin in Groups NF, RF, and C were significantly lower than that of the normal dentin in Group S (P <.05). The mean bond strengths of the 3 adhesives in Group NF were higher than those in Groups RF and C, but a significant difference was observed only when Clearfil SE Bond was used (P <.05). In SEM images the open dentinal tubules on the surface and the resin tag formation at the resin-dentin interface were apparent in Group NF but were not observed in Groups RF and C. On elemental analysis, considerable amounts of fluoride and calcium were detected in the surfaces of Group NF. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the surface treatment with fluoride solution supported the resin tag formation at the resin-dentin interface and slightly improved the bond strength of the self-etching adhesive systems tested to demineralized dentin. This result indicated that the fluoride treatment to demineralized dentin might contribute to the success of the sealed restoration.     

Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems (Solid Bond, EBS-Multi, PermaQuik, One Coat Bond, Gluma One Bond, Prime & Bond NT/NRC and Clearfil Liner Bond 2V) and their respective fracture modes. METHODS: Superficial occlusal dentin of extracted human molars was exposed, finished with wet 600-grit silicon carbide paper, and a block of resin composite bonded with the above adhesives according to the manufacturers' instructions. The teeth were kept in tap water for 24 h at 37 degrees C, sectioned to obtain three or four bar-shaped specimens, which were then shaped to an hour-glass form of 1.2 +/- 0.02 mm diameter. The specimens were stressed at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until rupture of the bond. The mean bond strengths were compared using one-way ANOVA and LSD tests. The frequency of fracture modes was compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: Mean microtensile bond strengths ranged from (17.8 +/- 7.0) MPa for Solid Bond to (36.0 +/- 8.1) MPa for Clearfil Liner Bond 2V. The bond strength of Clearfil Liner Bond 2V and PermaQuik (30.8 +/- 8.5 MPa) were not significantly different, and were higher than all other materials. Bond strengths of Solid Bond (17.8 +/- 7.0) MPa, EBS-Multi (18.7 +/- 5.0) MPa, One Coat Bond (21.9 +/- 5.6) MPa, and Gluma One Bond (23.4 +/- 5.2) MPa were not significantly different. SEM examination indicated that Solid Bond, EBS-Multi and One Coat Bond showed no significant difference in failure modes but were significantly different from PermaQuik, Prime & Bond NT/NRC and Clearfil Liner Bond 2V. SIGNIFICANCE: The self-etching primer system, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, provided the simplest bonding technique, and together with PermaQuik exhibited greatest bond strength to dentin.     

Evaluation of residual dentin after conventional and chemomechanical caries removal using SEM

The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the residual dentinal surfaces following caries removal using rotatory instruments and two chemomechanical methods (Papacárie and Carisolv), by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Thirty primary incisors were divided into three groups, according to the caries removal method used, and their residual dentin was examined under SEM (15). After caries removal, 15 of these teeth were restored with Single Bond (3M) adhesive system and Z100 Filtek composite resin (3M). The tags of the replicas were observed under SEM. The chemomechanical caries removal methods (Papacárie and Carisolv) formed an amorphous layer, similar to the smear layer and few exposed dentinal tubules; the conventional caries removal method produced a smooth and regular dentinal surface, with typical smear layer and exposed dentinal tubules. All groups showed abundant tag formation. Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed a difference between dentin treated with rotatory instruments and that treated with chemomechanical methods in spite of the occurrence of a similar tag formation in both groups.     

Shear bond strength of acetone-based one-bottle adhesive systems

The aim of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of four acetone-based one-bottle adhesive systems to enamel and dentin, and compare to that of an ethanol-based system used as control. Fifty human molars were bisected mesiodistally and the buccal and lingual surfaces were embedded in acrylic resin using PVC cylinders. The buccal surfaces were ground to obtain flat dentin surfaces, while the lingual surfaces were ground to obtain flat enamel surfaces. All specimens were polished up to 600-grit sandpapers and randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=20; 10 dentin specimens and 10 enamel specimens), according to the adhesive system used: One-Step (Bisco); Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer); Solobond M (Voco); TenureQuik w/F (Den-Mat) and OptiBond Solo Plus (Kerr) (control). Each adhesive system was applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. The respective proprietary hybrid composite was applied in a gelatin capsule (d=4.3 mm) and light-cured for 40 s. The specimens were tested in shear strength with an Instron machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Bond strengths means were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's post-hoc (p< or =0.05). Shear bond strength means (MPa) (+/-SD) to enamel and dentin were: Enamel: One-Step=11.3(+/-4.9); Gluma One Bond=16.3(+/-10.1); Solobond M=18.9(+/-4.5); TenureQuik w/F=18.7(+/-4.5) and OptiBond Solo Plus=16.4(+/-3.9); Dentin: One-Step=6.4(+/-2.8); Gluma One Bond=3.0(+/-3.4); Solobond M=10.6(+/-4.9); TenureQuik w/F=7.8(+/-3.9) and OptiBond Solo Plus=15.1(+/-8.9). In enamel, the adhesive systems had statistically similar bond strengths to each other (p>0.05). However, the ethanol-based system (OptiBond Solo Plus) showed significantly higher bond strength to dentin than the acetone-based systems (p< or =0.0001). In conclusion, the solvent type (acetone or ethanol) had no influence on enamel bond strength, but had great influence on dentin bonding, which should be taken into account when choosing the adhesive system.     

Effect of the hydration status of the smear layer on the wettability and bond strength of a self-etching primer to dentin

PURPOSE: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of a resin-based composite to smear layer-covered dentin using a self-etching primer, Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB), under two different hydration states. Surface roughness and wettability (contact angle measurements) of water and the CSEB primer were also evaluated on this substrate. METHODS: Contact angle (CA) measurements were performed on four caries-free extracted human third molars. The specimens were sectioned parallel to the occlusal surface to expose the moderately deep dentin and ground flat (180-grit SiC) under water to provide uniform flat surfaces. In two samples, the smear layer was completely air-dried; in the other two specimens, the smear layer was briefly air-dried. Contact angle measurements were performed to assess wettability of water and CSEB primer using the Axisymmetric Drop Shape Analysis technique. Surface roughness (SR) was determined with a contact profilometer. In another four molars, CSEB was applied to the smear layer-covered dentin with both hydration states. Resin build-ups were performed incrementally with Tetric Ceram. After storage for 24 hours in water at 37 degrees C, the teeth were sectioned to obtain bonded beams with an average cross-sectional area of 1.0 mm2. Each beam was tested in tension in an Instron machine at 0.5 mm/minute. Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Student t-tests were performed at a 95% significance level. RESULTS: Observed water contact angles were lower on the hydrated smear layer but no differences were found between contact angles on completely and briefly air-dried smear layer when the primer was used for CA measurements. SR was similar for both substrates and MTBS was greater when the adhesive was applied on the completely air-dried smear layer.     

Influence of storage conditions of adhesive vials on dentin bond strength

This study was carried out to examine the effect of storage conditions of adhesive vials on the dentin bond strength of single-step self-etch adhesive systems. The adhesive/resin composite combinations used were: Absolute 2/Ceram.X(AB), Adper Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Supreme(AP), Bond Force/Estelite sigma Quick(BF), Clearfil tri-S Bond/Clearfil AP-X(CT) and G-Bond/Gradia Direct(GB). Vials of adhesives were stored at 5 degrees C, 23 degrees C or 40 degrees C. Specimens for the dentin bond strength tests were made after 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 months. Labial bovine mandibular incisor dentin was wet ground with #600 SiC. The adhesives were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. After adhesive light irradiation, resin composite cylinders were created (4 mm x 2 mm) and polymerized (n = 10). Samples were stored in 37 degrees C distilled water for 24 hours, then shear tested at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute. ANOVA and Dunnet tests were performed at a significance level of 0.05. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) observations of the dentin surfaces were made. Bond strengths varied, with storage conditions ranging from 2.2 +/- 1.4 to 9.3 +/- 2.4 MPa for AB, 4.5 +/- 1.5 to 13.3 +/- 2.7 MPa for AP, 5.1 +/- 1.9 to 5.1 +/- 1.9 MPa for BF, 7.7 +/- 1.9 to 19.7 +/- 2.0 MPa for CT and 7.4 +/- 1.3 to 15.7 +/- 2.8 MPa for GB. With longer storage periods and higher temperatures, significant decreases in bond strength were found for all the adhesives. From SEM observation, the etching effect of the adhesives was weakened and the remaining smear layer was observed. The data suggests that the storage conditions of adhesive vials significantly affects the bond strengths of single-application self-etch adhesive systems.